Establishing and Maintaining Vascular Access

Published on 04/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3006 times

Establishing and Maintaining Vascular Access

John C. Mansour and John E. Niederhuber

Summary of Key Points

• Three questions to ask when selecting a catheter system are: (1) Which device best meets the patient’s therapy and lifestyle needs? (2) How is the device most safely inserted and maintained? (3) What are the potential immediate and long-term complication risks?

• Types of central access systems are the traditional central line for short-term use, tunneled central lines for long-term use, surgically implanted infusion ports, and peripherally inserted central catheters.

• Vascular access devices can be placed using a number of anatomic sites to access the superior vena cava or inferior vena cava: the subclavian vein, internal jugular vein, external jugular vein, and femoral vein.

• Insertion can be performed via the Seldinger (closed) technique or by operative exposure of the vein (open technique).

• Short-term complications include vascular laceration, arterial puncture, pneumothorax (2%), hemothorax, and air embolus (overall placement complications should be <5%).

• Long-term complications include catheter exit site or tract infection, catheter-associated sepsis, cardiac arrhythmias, catheter colonization, catheter thrombus (~30%), fibrin sheath, extravasation, occluded catheter, and shearing of the catheter.

• Factors increasing the risk of catheter-associated infection include prolonged duration of indwelling time, multiple-lumen catheters, femoral locations, non–catheter-related bacteremia (in a neutropenic patient), the number of times the system is accessed, difficult catheter placement, and poor technique in catheter or port-site care.

Introduction

During the course of their disease, many patients with cancer require intravenous chemotherapy, frequent blood sampling, transfusion of blood products, or total parenteral nutrition. Many of these intravenously administered therapies are inflammatory to small peripheral veins. During the past three decades, techniques for obtaining and maintaining central vascular access have been developed and refined. Managing the treatment of patients with cancer requires a thorough familiarity with the special use of vascular access devices. This chapter provides a review of the pros and cons of various devices, insertion methods, and catheter maintenance techniques.

Few randomized controlled trials have examined the clinical controversies that are involved with chronic vascular access for patients with cancer. In addition, many of the larger studies regarding central vascular access were performed in the inpatient intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Comparing patients in the ICU with patients who have cancer and receive chemotherapy or weekly blood draws on an outpatient basis could lead to inaccurate conclusions. It is important, however, to review the available randomized trials, a number of carefully performed retrospective analyses, and pertinent ICU literature to address some of the questions concerning vascular access for patients with cancer.

When evaluating a patient who requires vascular access for treatment of a malignancy, three important questions must be answered: (1) What device will best meet this patient’s therapeutic needs? (2) How can we most safely insert and maintain central venous access? (3) What are the immediate and delayed complications of vascular access procedures that are unique to the oncology patient population?

Choosing the Right Device

Clinical oncologists use the vascular access devices discussed in this chapter to aspirate blood and infuse agents into central veins, such as the superior vena cava (SVC) or inferior vena cava. Many chemotherapeutic agents and parenteral nutrition formulations act as vesicants to the venous intima, causing inflammation and thrombosis of smaller veins. By infusing this type of product into the higher flow, less thrombogenic cardinal veins, the durability and safety of vascular access can be extended and patient comfort can be enhanced significantly.

Percutaneous Central Lines

Traditional central lines are placed with use of the Seldinger technique, which is described in detail later in this chapter. The subclavian vein, internal jugular vein, or femoral vein is cannulated percutaneously, and the catheter is placed with use of guide-wire assistance. There is a very short distance between the skin and the catheter’s entry point into the vein. Theoretically, this proximity to skin flora increases the risk of subsequent central line infection.

These central lines are in common use throughout most hospitals for patients with cancer, critically ill patients, or any patients who require infusions that are poorly tolerated via peripheral intravenous access. Such central lines provide excellent short-term access to the central venous system. In general, percutaneous central lines are considered only for short-term use, and after the first 7 to 10 days, percutaneous central lines have a markedly higher incidence of infection despite optimal skin entrance site dressing techniques. Obviously, prolonged patient neutropenia and episodes of bacteremia could result in shorter life spans of such catheters.

Patients with cancer who require a relatively short course of an infusion or need a bridge to placement of a more long-term catheter could benefit from these traditional central venous catheters. Meticulous sterile dressing changes are an absolute necessity for outpatients who need short-term therapy via these lines. Patients without the resources or dexterity to care for percutaneous central lines are at a prohibitively increased risk of line infection, bacteremia, or a thrombotic event and should be provided with a long-term form of central access. Certain comorbid conditions (e.g., burns, open wounds near the line site, or a tracheostomy) preclude placement of this type of vascular access.

Surgically Tunneled Central Lines

Most patients with cancer need a long-term form of central venous access rather than a traditional short-term central line. Surgically tunneled central lines were developed to increase the distance between the skin entrance site and the puncture of the vein. The hypothesis was that by increasing this distance, the life span of the central access would be increased by decreasing the incidence of infection and thrombosis. Tunneled central lines are commonly referred to by the name of the first brand that was marketed—Hickman. Other examples include Broviac, Quinton, and Groshong (Fig. 26-1). These polymeric silicone rubber venous access catheters are placed via a subcutaneous tunnel that is described in detail later in this chapter. Clinical studies have supported the hypothesis that increasing the distance between the catheter exit site in the skin and the hole in the vein decreases the incidence of externally derived infection.1,2 Studies suggest that the incidence of bloodstream infections associated with tunneled catheters is approximately 1 to 2 per 1000 catheter days.3 The frequency of bacteremia among nontunneled catheters has been reported at between 1.0 and 13.0 per 1000 catheter days.66

A Dacron cuff located 3 to 4 cm from the exit site encourages scar formation to fix the catheter in place. This exaggerated scarring eliminates the need for long-term sutures to hold the catheter in place to the skin. Avoiding these fixation sutures can decrease the incidence of stitch reactivity and associated localized skin infections. One drawback of this type of central access device is the inconvenience of placing and removing the lines. In most instances, surgeons or interventional radiologists insert these lines under local anesthetic and intravenous sedation. Therefore these procedures require coordination of the patient, the surgeon or interventional radiologist, and possibly the anesthesia/operating room staff. Tunneled catheters are more uncomfortable to remove than are nontunneled lines because of the Dacron cuff scar reaction. Removal requires local anesthesia but can be accomplished outside of the operating room.

Surgically Implanted Infusion Ports

Implantable ports consist of a small injection reservoir with a self-sealing membrane placed entirely beneath the skin. There is no external catheter. An internal catheter runs from the reservoir into the subclavian or internal jugular vein to provide central access. The internal catheter is essentially identical to those used for tunneled central lines. A noncoring (Huber) needle can pass directly through the skin into the reservoir for infusion or aspiration. The self-sealing rubber cap on the reservoir prevents leakage from the reservoir after withdrawal of the Huber needle. The gauge of the noncoring needle—not the catheter—typically limits flow through the port system (Fig. 26-2). The ports can also be used for continuous drug infusion, as shown in Figure 26-3.

The theoretical concern that bacteria more easily traverse the short distance between the skin and the “neo-vein” or reservoir and cause increased rates of infection does not prove true.7 Sterile technique and site care lead to an infection risk comparable with that of tunneled catheters. With adequate care, the rate of infection could be fourfold to fivefold less than that for tunneled catheters.3 The low rate of infection and extravasation make infusion ports ideally suited for patients with cancer who need long-term single-lumen access and a low-maintenance catheter. However, experience has shown that patients with prolonged periods of neutropenia or significant risk of cutaneous eruptions might not be good candidates for port devices. The visible lump of the port could bother extremely thin patients; however, the port on the anterior chest wall is easily hidden from plain view for most people.

Long-Line Central Access

Also known as a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line), the long-line central access vascular access device is becoming increasingly popular. The catheter is inserted into a brachial, cephalic, or antecubital vein and advanced into the subclavian vein or higher. These lines can be placed simply and easily in the outpatient office setting and are well tolerated by patients, with minimal risk. However, many patients with cancer have poor-quality arm veins after undergoing multiple peripheral infusions and are therefore poor candidates for this technique. The 50% risk of catheter-related thrombosis is the greatest drawback to more widespread use of PICC lines in patients with cancer. This problem is a result of the presence of a long length of catheter within the vein and to the catheter tip in the relatively low-flow subclavian vein. Advancing the catheter tip into the SVC can reduce the incidence of thrombosis by more than half.8 Accurate placement of the catheter tip in the SVC can be complicated by the large displacement of the catheter tip (up to 8 cm) with normal arm range of motion.9

Inserting Vascular Access Devices

Providing patients who are undergoing treatment for cancer with appropriate vascular access requires not only a thorough knowledge of available devices but also technical expertise in the procedures for placing these catheters. Although these procedures are sometimes viewed as routine, the risks of poor technique can be devastating for the patient. Before undertaking the procedure, the physician should carefully consider everything from the site of insertion to the dressing to be used at the end of the procedure (Table 26-1).

Table 26-1

General Guidelines for Catheter and Port Use

Type Advantages Uses Dressings Flushing Comments
Central line Placed at bedside Hospital use only Sterile transparent dressing 5 mL heparinized saline solution (10 units/mL) in each lumen daily or after each use Antibiotic ointment may promote resistance
  Easy removal        
  One or multiple lumens   Change dressing twice weekly    
  Can change over wire        
PICC catheter Safe to insert and remove 1 wk to 6 mo of IV access Transparent antimicrobial foam dressing 3 mL heparinized saline solution bid or after each use Flush and draw blood slowly to avoid catheter migration
      Change every 6 days    
Hickman catheter Multiple sizes and lumens Continuous infusion therapy Newly placed: antimicrobial dressing for 7 to 10 days 5 mL heparinized saline solution daily or after each use Clean with chlorhexidine during dressing change
  Tunneled under skin Long-term access      
      Gauze or transparent dressing changed 2 times per wk   After 4 wk may clean with antimicrobial soap
Groshong catheter Slit valve requires no heparin flushes Single- or double-lumen catheter for long-term use      
  Smaller, more flexible catheter        
Port Completely under skin One lumen access and low maintenance None 5 mL heparinized saline solution daily or after each use Clean with chlorhexidine before use, access with noncoring needle
  Minimal care     20 mL saline solution after blood draw  
        Monthly flush with 5 mL heparinized saline solution (100 units/mL) Use no needle >20 gauge to access;
EMLA cream helpful

image

bid, Twice a day; EMLA, eutectic mixture of local anesthetics; IV, intravenous; PICC, peripherally inserted central catheter.

Choosing Insertion Location

Vascular access devices can be placed with use of a number of different access points, including the internal jugular, subclavian, external jugular, and femoral veins. The vast majority of catheters that are used for long-term vascular access in patients with cancer are placed in the internal jugular and subclavian veins. We will limit this discussion to these most common access sites.

The most frequent site for insertion of vascular access devices in the oncology population is the subclavian vein. Clavicular fracture or a previous median sternotomy can alter the anatomy of this location. For a patient with such a history, an alternative site should be considered. Even for patients with standard venous anatomy, the acute angle at the confluence of the subclavian and internal jugular veins at the brachiocephalic vein can complicate the passing of the guide wire into the SVC. A higher incidence of pneumothorax, hemothorax, and catheter malposition occurs among inexperienced operators, and a higher incidence of vein stenosis occurs with subclavian vein placement than with internal jugular placement.10 A subclavian artery puncture during line placement can be difficult to control because of the position of the artery posterior to the clavicle. A catheter placed on the anterior chest wall is more comfortable and easier to cover with clothing, however, than is a line in the neck.

In many ways, the internal jugular vein is the ideal location with regard to ease of placement of a central catheter. The path of the guide wire during placement is straight, thereby limiting many guide-wire complications and catheter malposition. In the event of carotid artery puncture, arterial bleeding can be controlled safely with the application of direct pressure. This advantage is especially important in the patients with thrombocytopenia. The incidence of central venous occlusion is decreased, which could be important for patients who are likely to need an arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis in the future. Unfortunately, patients often report pain with neck and shoulder movements after placement of an internal jugular catheter.

Preparing to Place the Vascular Access Device

Adequate preparation for placing a central venous catheter in a patient with cancer includes several steps before the actual line insertion. The surgeon must make several decisions that can limit the incidence of both immediate and delayed complications and ensure optimal line function.

Studies suggest that providing a single dose of prophylactic antibiotic to cover common skin flora before inserting the vascular access device reduces central line infection. However, it is difficult to determine how this small benefit affects antibiotic resistance and subsequent infections. Use of central venous catheters impregnated with antibiotics could be more effective in dealing with infectious complications and will be discussed later in this chapter.11

A sterile surgical field with mask, gown, cap, gloves, and a large sterile drape should be used to minimize the risk of line infection.12 The skin of the entire anterior neck and chest should be prepared with chlorhexidine, which is superior to povidone-iodine or alcohol in limiting line infections.13,14

The choice to use ultrasound guidance to identify the vein during cannulation should be addressed before beginning the procedure. Less-experienced operators will likely benefit from the use of ultrasound guidance as an adjunct to the anatomic landmarks technique.15,16 Ultrasound can decrease the incidence of arterial puncture and placement failure. Although a few reports exist in the literature regarding the advantage of these techniques, such superiority is often judged when compared with high rates of complications using the landmark approach as the control group.

The operator must also decide where to position the catheter tip within the central vein. Catheters positioned with the tip in the right atrium will function longer as a source for aspirating blood samples than will those with the tip positioned in the SVC.17,18 A case review of thrombosed catheters documents that the position of the tip of the catheter at the time of thrombosis seems to be the most important contributing factor.19,20 The closer the catheter tip is to the right atrium, the lower is the frequency of thrombosis and infection. The risk of a catheter tip in the right atrial position is primarily that of cardiac arrhythmias when the tip is near the tricuspid valve. An additional risk of right atrial catheter placement is right atrial thrombus or right atrial erosion.20 These risks have led the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to publicly warn operators to avoid placement of the catheter tip within the right atrium. Instead, the catheter tip should sit at the junction of the SVC and the right atrium.

Insertion Technique

After informed consent is obtained, a rolled towel is placed directly under the vertebral column at the shoulders to extend the clavicles. A peripheral line is established, and the patient is connected to an electrocardiogram monitor and a pulse oximeter. Intravenous sedation is typically established by using small doses of benzodiazepines. The fluoroscopy operating table and the patient are placed in the Trendelenburg position. The skin of the neck and the entire upper anterior thorax is prepared, and sterile drapes are positioned. The skin and deep tissues are anesthetized with 1% lidocaine using a 25-gauge needle for the skin followed by a 22-gauge needle for the anticipated insertion tract (Fig. 26-4, A).

For subclavian vein puncture, the site of skin puncture is usually 1 cm below the angle of the lateral third of the clavicle. The long insertion needle, as depicted in Figure 26-4, A, is slowly inserted below the clavicle, aiming for a point approximately one fingerbreadth above the sternal notch. During insertion, a small amount of negative pressure is maintained on the syringe. With experience, the physician develops a feel for the actual puncture of the vein, and when this occurs, the syringe fills easily with venous blood.

As the position of the needle is being carefully maintained, the syringe is removed, and the guide wire is inserted (Fig. 26-4, B). If the patient experiences discomfort in the neck, the guide wire is partially withdrawn. Turning the patient’s head away from the site of insertion and exerting a gentle downward pull on the ipsilateral arm may facilitate entrance of the catheter or guide wire into the SVC. Minimizing extreme or sudden neck and arm movements can limit the risk of injury to the punctured vein. Cardiac ectopy indicates that the guide wire has entered the right atrium, and the wire should be withdrawn slightly.

Fluoroscopy may be used to pass the wire when difficulty is experienced. The correct position of the catheter is confirmed by fluoroscopy or a chest radiograph before the catheter is secured with a 3-0 nylon suture at the skin exit site. The tip of the catheter is positioned 1 cm above the SVC–atrial junction when the patient is in the Trendelenburg position. A chest radiograph is obtained to document the absence of pneumothorax and accurate placement of the catheter within the SVC.

When it is necessary to use the veins in the neck, the right internal jugular vein provides more direct access to the SVC and right atrium. In this case, the patient’s head is turned to the opposite side. The insertion site is located just lateral to the carotid artery and approximately two fingerbreadths above the head of the clavicle. Another useful landmark for the insertion site is the angle formed by the sternal and clavicular heads of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (Fig. 26-5).

Placement of a permanent Silastic catheter, such as a Hickman catheter, is depicted in Figure 26-6. Placement of the introducing needle and guide wire is as described in previous figures except that a 1-cm incision is made before insertion of the introduction needle. A prophylactic antibiotic is administered before the procedure. It is often beneficial to provide the patient with intravenous sedation.

A second 1-cm incision is placed lower on the anterior chest, usually at the level of the fourth or fifth interspace. The skin and subcutaneous tissues are first anesthetized with 1% lidocaine. The projected course of the tunneled catheter is also infiltrated with lidocaine. A tunneler is passed from the lower incision to the upper incision, where the guide wire is exiting. A heavy suture is tied to the end of the tunneler and brought down through the tract. The suture is tied to the end of the catheter and used to pull the catheter up through the tract, securing the cuff 3 to 4 cm from the skin exit site. The catheter is trimmed to the correct length that will position it about 1 cm above the SVC-right atrium junction with the patient in Trendelenburg position. This location is approximately four fingerbreadths below the sternal notch.

Care is taken to cut the catheter squarely and smoothly. An introducer and a tear-away sheath are passed over the guide wire into the vein (Fig. 26-7). A slight rotary motion facilitates the introduction of the sheath and avoids crimping. To avoid developing a false passage, the guide wire should be withdrawn occasionally as the introducer is inserted. The guide wire is then removed, and a syringe is attached to the introducer to confirm that blood can be aspirated. The introducer is removed, and the thumb is used to control bleeding or air intake through the sheath. It is important to have the catheter tip poised to be inserted as the introducer is removed. The passage of the catheter could meet minimal resistance as it is passed between the clavicle and first rib.

Fluoroscopy or a chest radiograph is obtained to confirm correct positioning and the absence of pneumothorax. The catheter is aspirated and flushed to confirm function. Care should be taken to avoid any angulations of the catheter through the subcutaneous tract, especially at the bend toward the subclavian vein. The incision below the clavicle is closed with a subcutaneous absorbable suture. The catheter is secured at the exit site with a 3-0 nylon suture, which is maintained for approximately 3 weeks to allow the fibrous tissue ingrowth into the subcutaneous cuff. The exit site is covered with a sterile gauze dressing.

Similar techniques apply to the use of neck veins. The catheter is tunneled over the clavicle, with the exit site the same as for subclavian vein placement. When other sites are required (e.g., the femoral vein with the catheter tip in the inferior vena cava), direct cut-down exposure of the saphenous vein or another large femoral branch is preferred.

Figure 26-8 illustrates the placement of an implanted injection port. A 1-cm incision is placed below the clavicle at the site planned for subclavian venipuncture. A second, 3-cm incision is placed lower on the chest in a position that provides a relatively flat surface and stability for the port chamber. Local anesthesia is provided via 1% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine. A subcutaneous pocket just large enough to accommodate the port is dissected inferior to the incision. Ideally, the level of this pocket is over the underlying pectoral fascia. The skin coverage needs to be thick, but the port must be percutaneously accessible. A tunneler is passed subcutaneously from the pocket through the infraclavicular incision. A suture is tied to the tunneler and brought down through the tract. The suture is tied to the end of the port catheter and used to pull the catheter through the tract to the intraclavicular incision. Care should be taken to position with a gentle curve and to avoid catheter angulation. The port is secured in the pocket with three sutures of 0 Prolene. It is necessary to anchor the port adequately to prevent flipping or rotation of the device.

The guide wire is inserted as described, and the dilator and sheath are passed over it. The catheter is cut to the desired length. The dilator and guide wire are removed, and the catheter is inserted through the sheath as described. The incision for the port pocket is closed with interrupted 3-0 absorbable sutures placed in the subcutaneous layer. The skin is approximated with a running subarticular 4-0 absorbable suture. A transparent nonpermeable dressing is used at the port incision.

Open insertion methods are quite safe in a skilled surgeon’s hands. The major complication of the open technique is the possibility of air embolus during the actual catheter insertion. This complication is most likely to occur in patients who are hypovolemic, cachectic, or unable to tolerate positioning in the Trendelenburg position. An air embolus happens most frequently when the internal jugular vein is used; however, extreme care with use of the purse-string suture around the insertion site and venous occlusion with vascular clamps should limit the possibility of the introduction of air into the vascular system. With open direct surgical placement—although it takes considerably longer than the closed Seldinger technique—complications should be much lower than 5%.21 The open method results in a complication rate of less than 1%. Although the open method is a safer technique, it requires more training, more experienced operative personnel, and larger incisions. The open method should be used with any patient who has had repeated problems with closed insertions because the open method is the most controlled and safest format for that patient. Sometimes previous operations or radiation therapy in the region of the cardinal veins makes the open operative approach more difficult, but generally such problems are limited.

Complications of Vascular Access Devices

When complication rates are examined as a whole, certain patient factors, catheter factors, and operator factors seem to predict the occurrence of complications. Patient-related factors predicting higher complication rates include the presence of multiple comorbid conditions, atherosclerosis, abnormal anatomy, thrombocytopenia, immunocompromise, prior radiation therapy at the insertion area, recent myocardial infarction, and patient restlessness.22 In addition, multiple-lumen or stiffer catheters carry increased risks of complications.2326 Factors related to the person performing the insertion of the catheter also influence the risk of complications. Risk increases if the operator has inserted fewer than 50 central venous catheters, if more than two tries at cannulating the vein are required, or if the insertion of the catheter is difficult.9,27 Risk factors for specific complications are discussed in the sections that follow.

Immediate Complications

Pneumothorax

Published complication rates for pneumothorax after jugular vein central line placement are approximately 0.5%, and they are up to four times higher for subclavian vein procedures.9,23,24,28 The risk of this technical complication can be reduced dramatically among experienced operators or among physicians who have experienced supervisors.22

Bleeding

Many patients with cancer are at increased risk of bleeding complications because of thrombocytopenia, uremia, other platelet dysfunction, or anticoagulant therapy. Bleeding complications are associated most frequently with thrombocytopenia.25 For patients with platelet counts less than 50 or an International Normalized Ratio greater than 2.0, we consider administration of platelets or fresh-frozen plasma. Experienced physicians should perform these procedures with access to ultrasound guidance if necessary.

Cardiac Arrhythmias

Disruptions in the normal cardiac conduction pathway can be caused by contact between the catheter and the right atrium. Most of these arrhythmias are short-lived and self-limited.29 These problems are more common with insertion of pulmonary artery catheters than with catheters that are typically inserted for oncologic vascular access. Patients who have recently had a myocardial infarction or who have a history of left bundle branch block are more prone to significant sequelae from the arrhythmias.26,29

Delayed Complications

Infectious Complications

Infectious complications are the most common complications of long-term vascular access devices in the oncology patient population. Two factors make the interpretation of this relatively well-studied topic challenging. First, many of the large randomized controlled trials that have studied central line infections have concentrated on patients in the ICU. The ICU population has different risk factors and susceptibilities from those of the outpatient population of people with cancer. Nevertheless, by carefully reviewing the available data, we can make some conclusions regarding the pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment of line-related infections among patients with cancer. In studies of patients in the ICU with central lines, factors that predispose to line infection have included malignancy, neutropenia, extended duration of indwelling time, and coincident parenteral nutrition. All of these factors can contribute to the incidence of infection among patients with vascular access for oncologic treatment.30

Second, the confusing terminology regarding line-related infections can make the literature on this topic difficult to interpret. Local infection is a positive culture at the catheter insertion site. Catheter colonization or infection is the positive culture of a segment of removed catheter. Catheter-associated bacteremia is evidenced by a positive blood culture from a site other than the catheter and the positive culture of a segment of removed catheter with the same pathogen.

Understanding the pathophysiology of catheter-associated bacteremia can help limit the incidence of this complication. Up to 50% of catheter-associated bacteremia is caused by coagulase-negative staphylococcus. This common skin flora can colonize the catheter during insertion or later. A thrombus that forms at or along the catheter tip can become a nidus for bacterial proliferation, with resultant bacteremia. Thrombosis significantly increases the risks of colonization and infection.23 Bacteria can also be introduced into the bloodstream by hub contamination, by hematogenous seeding from another focus of infection, and, rarely, by the infusate itself.

Factors increasing the risk of catheter infection include prolonged indwelling time, multiple-lumen catheters, femoral vein location, difficult catheter placement, and non–catheter-related bacteremia.30,31 As was mentioned previously, nontunneled catheters are at increased risk of catheter infection compared with tunneled catheters, and totally implantable devices are even less susceptible than are tunneled catheters.32

Multiple-lumen catheters have demonstrated higher infection rates than single-lumen catheters. The addition of each lumen exponentially increases the incidence of infection.33,34 There are two possible explanations for this observation. First, the increased internal lumen diameter of the line is associated with a higher thrombosis rate and accumulation of loose thrombus at the catheter tip. Thrombosis causes more breaking of the line and more line manipulation when declotting is attempted, leading to subsequent infection. Second, the multiple ports invite multiple interruptions of the line for access and result in a greater likelihood of the introduction of bacteria. Despite their greater risk of iatrogenic infection, multiple-lumen catheters have great appeal for patients who need multiple simultaneous infusions of incompatible drugs. Very strict nursing guidelines must be followed in the management of multiple-lumen catheters to prevent iatrogenic infections and thrombosis.35

Diagnosis and management of catheter-related infection differ between nontunneled and tunneled catheters. However, some diagnostic principles apply to both tunneled and nontunneled catheters. Routine surveillance blood cultures should not be performed. When a catheter-related infection is suspected because of fever, chills, or purulence around the catheter site, percutaneous and catheter blood samples should be submitted for culture.36,37 Qualitative culture with continuously monitored differential time to positivity compares the time to positivity for catheter blood cultures with percutaneous peripheral blood cultures. This technique has demonstrated excellent specificity and sensitivity for detecting catheter-related infection in tunneled catheters.38

In most patients with nontunneled central venous catheters, the line should be removed if the patient demonstrates signs of site infection or sepsis or if blood culture results from the catheter and percutaneous blood samples are positive.38 Seven to 10 days of narrow-spectrum antibiotic therapy is generally recommended. In selected cases of clinically stable patients with a single episode of coagulase-negative staphylococcus, a trial of antibiotic therapy might salvage the catheter.34 For any patient with persistent bacteremia despite antibiotic therapy and removal of the infected catheter, a thorough investigation of possible septic sources, such as endocarditis or septic thrombus, is warranted.

Tunneled catheters or infusion ports should be removed in cases of sepsis, complicated infections, tunnel tract infections, or port abscesses.39 A thorough evaluation confirming the surgically implanted catheter as the source of infection should precede the removal of any of these vascular access devices. In the absence of complicated infection, catheter salvage could be indicated. Antibiotic lock therapy is a reasonable approach for attempting to salvage lines with common coagulase-negative staphylococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, or gram-negative bacilli intraluminal infections. This therapy consists of instilling the catheter lumen with high concentrations of antibiotics and leaving them there for several days.40 If salvage therapy fails, the infected catheter should be removed. A new tunneled catheter can be placed after treatment with an appropriate course of antimicrobial therapy until blood cultures are negative.

Catheter Thrombus

Thrombus of central vein access devices predisposes to both line malfunction and line infection. The most common site of thrombus formation with prolonged indwelling central catheters is where the catheter enters the vein. At this point, a fibrin sleeve progresses distally toward the tip of the catheter. The precipitating event is likely local trauma from line insertion with subsequent endothelial damage and disruption of intraluminal laminar flow. The venous intima exposed to blood flow activates the coagulation cascade. Understanding this pathophysiology helps explain why difficult line placements often lead to shorter catheter survival and increased rates of infection.

The incidence of central venous catheter–related thrombus as demonstrated by ultrasound may be up to 30% for catheters in place longer than 7 days.41 This problem typically presents as progressive difficulty in flushing the catheter. A change in posture or the Valsalva maneuver could allow aspiration of blood. Occasionally, thrombosis can manifest as extremity edema, which can be especially devastating after axillary nodal resection or axillary irradiation. Management of a nonfunctioning catheter is discussed later in this chapter.

Acute line obstruction can also be caused by precipitation of incompatible medications. Common offenders include total parenteral nutrition, etoposide salts, lipid emulsions, calcium salts, antibiotics, and sodium bicarbonate. Infusion of a solution specifically matched to the precipitated material might flush the line.42

Clavicular–First Rib Compression

Clavicular–first rib compression is an infrequently discussed complication that may occur up to 1% of the time in long-term indwelling catheters.44 When the subclavian vein is cannulated more medially than usual in the narrow space between the clavicle and first rib, the line can be compressed between the first rib and the clavicle. This compression should be suspected in patients who report difficulty infusing while in the sitting position or when the ipsilateral arm is elevated or abducted. This malposition can be observed on a chest radiograph as kinking of the line over the first rib. The catheter can break free and embolize if the line is not promptly removed. An interventional radiologist using a percutaneous retrograde femoral catheterization approach may be able to retrieve an embolized section of catheter.

Management of Nonfunctioning Catheters

When a central venous catheter does not return blood or infuse solution, the malfunction should be assessed systematically to maximize catheter durability and to minimize the incidence of catheter-related complications. The first step in this assessment is reviewing the most recent chest radiograph to confirm appropriate placement. The next step is checking for gravity flow. Connecting a bag of normal saline solution to gravity flow and asking the patient to change position, cough, and breathe deeply will demonstrate whether flow is positional. If the catheter is patent to gravity flow, the bag should be lowered below the catheter and blood return should be assessed. With this information, the physician can make a decision about whether to remove, reposition, or declot the catheter (Tables 26-2 and 26-3).

Table 26-2

Management of a Suspected Clot

Complications Cause Gravity Flow Observation Corrective Action
Fibrin sheath* Fibrin collects on the tip or encases the catheter Excellent in all positions but no blood return in any position May be declotted by following the declotting procedure
Occluded catheter* Fibrin and platelets collect inside the catheter Inability to infuse solutions and draw blood May be declotted by following the declotting procedure; drug precipitate cannot be corrected with tissue plasminogen activator or heparin

image

*The fibrin sheath and an occluded catheter are the only two instances in which it is safe to declot after checking the chest radiograph for proper placement.

Table 26-3

Management of an Unknown Clot

Complications Cause Gravity Flow Observation Corrective Action
Do not attempt to declot any of the following conditions:      
 Malposition Catheter cut short and abutting vessel wall Positional; no blood return in any position Must be removed; do not attempt to declot, which may erode vessel wall
 Pinch-off syndrome Insertion site too close to first rib and clavicle Excellent when lying down but absent when standing Must be removed to avoid catheter breakage
 Transverse catheter Catheter crosses into opposite subclavian Positional flow, slow blood return, position noted on chest radiograph Interventional radiology can reposition via femoral vein access
 Arrhythmia Catheter in right atrium Positional; position noted on chest radiograph Catheter must be pulled back into superior vena cava or removed
 Flipped up Catheter tip in jugular vein; can occur in association with vomiting or coughing Positional, blood return may be positional, patient report of tinnitus or headache with catheter flushing, position noted on chest radiograph Interventional radiology may be able to reposition if the catheter is not cut too short
 Major vessel thrombus External thrombus within vessel due to insertion trauma No change; good blood return; arm, hand, or neck swelling Documentation of thrombus with ultrasound or venogram; treatment with thrombolytics after consultation with hematology

image

Two conditions are appropriate for thrombolysis of the catheter with alteplase or tissue plasminogen activator (TPA): fibrin sheaths and intraluminal thrombus occlusions. Contraindications for declotting procedures include high bleeding risk and a known recent or current episode of bleeding.

Catheter malfunction caused by a fibrin sheath usually demonstrates good gravity flow and no blood return because the sheath acts as a one-way valve, allowing inflow but not outflow through the catheter. When intraluminal fibrin and platelets occlude the catheter, the catheter will demonstrate neither gravity flow nor return, regardless of any positional changes. If the caregiver is convinced that the catheter malfunction fits one of these categories and appropriate catheter position is confirmed on a chest radiograph, catheter thrombolysis is indicated. Contrast venography is not necessary before using TPA to open nonmechanical catheter occlusions.

Techniques for declotting catheters vary from institution to institution but follow the same general principles. We recommend instilling 500 µg of TPA and allowing the infusate to dwell for 1 hour. If patency is not restored after 1 hour, an additional milligram of TPA should be instilled and the infusate should be allowed to dwell for another hour. With use of a very similar technique, the authors of the Cardiovascular Thrombolytic to Open Occluded Lines Trial studied nearly 1000 patients with occluded central venous catheters. These patients in a predominantly oncology population did not undergo prethrombolysis contrast studies. No deaths or major bleeding episodes were directly attributable to the thrombolysis. More than 87% of the catheters were opened with the TPA. At 3-month follow-up, nearly 75% of the catheters were still patent.45 A similar study in the oncologic population reported a success rate greater than 80%.46

Vascular Access Device Maintenance

The risk of complications with a long-term vascular access device does not end with insertion of the device. Proper care and maintenance of each type of central catheter can dramatically reduce the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia, catheter thrombosis, and line failure.47,48 Maintenance is performed not only by qualified staff of oncology centers but also by patients and family members in the outpatient setting. In Table 26-1 and Box 26-1, we have detailed our recommendations for central catheter care after a thorough review of the best available literature.

Box 26-1   Problem Solving in Catheter Use

Troubleshooting Guidelines

If a catheter does not have a blood return or will not infuse solution, perform the following troubleshooting techniques to diagnose the problem before proceeding with the declotting procedure:

1. Connect a flush bag of normal saline solution or 5% dextrose in water to the catheter and open the roller clamp to allow the fluid to flow to gravity.

2. Have the patient change position, take deep breaths, and cough while the drip rate is observed.

3. When infusing at the fastest rate, lower the bag and observe for a blood return.

4. If a blood return is observed, use the catheter as indicated, making a note that it is positional.

5. If no blood return is observed in any position, if gravity flows freely in all positions, and if the last chest radiograph verifies that the catheter tip is in the superior vena cava, proceed to declot the catheter with a likely fibrin sheath obstruction.

6. If the radiograph shows that the catheter tip position is questionable, obtain a dye study to verify the exact location of the catheter tip, the integrity of the catheter, and the flow of solution.