Transport of the critically ill

Published on 27/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1180 times

Chapter 4 Transport of the critically ill

All intensive care units (ICUs) are required to move critically ill patients for investigations or procedures that cannot be performed in the ICU. These patients have reduced or absent physiological reserves and even short trips can result in significant adverse events.1,2 These events can be reduced by the use of trained personnel.3,4

In addition, ICU personnel are frequently involved in the stabilisation and transfer of critically ill patients into an ICU,5 and some units may be involved in the transport of patients from the site of a prehospital incident, or between hospitals.6,7 The interhospital transfer could be due to the increasing sophistication of critical care facilities in tertiary hospitals compared with district or rural hospitals, different subspecialty capabilities, local bed shortages3 or, in certain health systems, for insurance or financial reasons. In some cases, the complexity of these interhospital transfers can be further complicated by the need for rapid transport, or the distances involved. All patient movement is associated with an increase in mortality or morbidity, but with an integrated approach using high-level clinical personnel who have the correct equipment and undertake sufficient planning, adverse events can be reduced.3,4,68 Regular ambulances or untrained hospital staff should not be expected to manage ICU patients. Compared with specialist transport teams, standard ambulances with junior doctor escorts are associated with more cases of hypotension, acidosis and death.9

The hospital of the future has been described as the critical care hub of a dispersed network of facilities linked by information systems and critical care transport services.10 Critical care transport should be part of a regional intensive care network and adhere to promulgated minimum standards for transport of the critically ill.11,12

INTERHOSPITAL TRANSPORT

The general principles of patient transport regarding equipment, patient monitoring and checking after movement are identical, whether intrahospital or interhospital. In interhospital transport the same problems are encountered but compounded by distance and the vehicular environment.

Patients are generally moved from the ICU for two reasons:

Moving an ICU patient is a high-risk procedure but with sufficient planning and preparation there should be little or no compromise to the patient’s condition. Unfortunately, this is not always achieved, as there are often a number of distractions that will divert staff from monitoring the patient, or disconnection of infusions or ventilation. In up to 70% of ICU patient transports, adverse events occur, in which:

However management is changed in 40–50% of patients, thus justifying the risk. Sufficient notification will allow the assembly of equipment, monitoring and sufficient staff who are trained and familiar with the equipment and the patient. The more complex the patient, the more capable the team required. In unstable patients the minimum team should consist of a suitably trained doctor (e.g. one capable of reintubating a ventilated patient and able to manage any changes occurring in the patient’s condition), the patient’s nurse and two assistants to move the bed and help to lift the patient. For more stable, less complicated patients the patient’s nurse and assistants may be sufficient.

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SCANNING

The hazards to a patient in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are greater due to limitations in the proximity of infusion pumps, ventilators and monitors to the magnet, and at times on catheters and pacemakers inserted in the patient. The need for the MRI should be balanced against the information likely to be gained. The three main problems with transport equipment are:

MRI units vary in policy, from prohibiting any equipment in the room to having minimal equipment that is placed as far away from the magnet as possible. The ability of ventilators and infusion pumps to function in the MRI scan room must have been tested prior to any patient being scanned, as some modern transport ventilators have failed in the MRI. Ideally, the equipment should be left outside the room with extensions added to the infusion and ventilator tubing, but this increases the risk of disconnection. There is one reported case of the external part of a pulmonary artery catheter burning through during an MRI scan,16 probably caused by the development of radiofrequency eddy currents. Thermodilution pulmonary artery catheters are probably safe, but although patients with internal defibrillators and permanent pacemakers have been scanned with no consequence, deaths have been reported. Prior discussion with individual MRI units on how ICU patients can be scanned is required.

INTERHOSPITAL TRANSPORT

ORGANISATIONAL ASPECTS

Provision of critical care transport services needs to be a part of regional ICU services. The staffing of critical care transport teams will depend on the workload, with around 300 per year being the threshold for a specific transport roster, depending on transport duration and regulations affecting duty times. Other factors include regional demographics, resources and geography. A team from within that unit, or from another ICU, or an emergency department, or a stand-alone transport service may provide transport of patients to a particular ICU. The merits of each system have been summarised.17 Whatever arrangement is chosen, staff should not be conscripts but selected from those interested in critical care transport, and should be appropriately trained. Use of junior inexperienced staff is associated with increases in preventable mortality and morbidity.18,19 Rostering of teams needs to be appropriate for the workload and take into account the potential for significant overtime hours when urgent requests occur near shift changeovers. If personnel are also allocated to other clinical duties, they need to be readily relieved when required. Equipment should be prechecked and the team should have a practised routine to enable prompt departure.

A coordination centre should be used in systems involving multiple requests and transport teams.

PERSONNEL

The aim of the transport team is at least to maintain but preferably to enhance the level of care. This requires transport teams to have diagnostic and procedural skills to provide the full complement of care for the full range of patients transported. Ideally, the personnel caring for the patient in transit should be equivalent to the ‘front-line’ clinical team at the destination, implying a physician-based team, although transport of well-stabilised patients by non-physician teams has been reported.20

The transport team should be a minimum of two people. For multiple patients a formula of n + 1 personnel for n critical patients has been suggested.21 Multidisciplinary teams of physicians, nurse and/or ambulance officers offer advantages of a wider range of skills and training than a team from any single profession. In certain circumstances, other specialised staff may need to be taken, for example a surgeon or obstetrician.6 It is preferable and safer to add a specialist to the standard team because of the latter’s familiarity with the practicalities of the transport environment. Other desirable attributes in staff include: good teamwork and communication skills; adaptability; reasonable body habitus and physical condition; and no significant visual or auditory impairment or susceptibility to motion sickness. Travel sickness medications such as hyoscine (scopolamine) are of limited value, needing to be taken up to 4 hours pretransport and possibly causing significant side-effects.22

Training should encompass:

Staff should have:

COMMUNICATIONS

A systematic approach is necessary to ensure a smooth response when the need for transport of a critically ill patient is identified. A single toll-free telephone number with conference call capability is the ideal. Facsimile and teleradiology capabilities may also be of value. The one call for assistance should result in the provision of clinical advice if required, the dispatch of a transport team, and finding a bed in an appropriate hospital. Concise, simple clinical advice appropriate for the capabilities of the referring hospital by either the receiving hospital or the transport service is paramount. No matter how fast the transport team’s response, without some interim care the patient with major airway, breathing or circulatory compromise will not survive.6,7 Ongoing advice, including stabilisation and preparation of the patient for transport, may be required prior to the arrival of the transport team. The provision to referring hospitals of a checklist for patient management and preparation for transport may assist.

The transport team should communicate with the receiving hospital, especially where changes in the patient’s condition change the time of arrival, posttransport management or destination within the hospital or to another centre. Cellular telephones have revolutionised communication in transit, but their use may not be possible in all circumstances. Radio communication between ground and air ambulances and relevant hospitals is a preferred back-up.

EQUIPMENT

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

Minimum standards for supplies, equipment and monitoring for critical care transport have been developed.10,17 Equipment selection is a compromise between providing for every conceivable scenario and being mobile. The aim should be to have a core set of equipment plus optional items for specific scenarios plus some back-up redundancy for vital supplies and equipment such as oxygen, airway devices and basic circulatory monitoring. A suggested equipment schedule is given in Table 4.1. Meticulous checking of equipment after each use and on a regular basis is essential.

Table 4.1 Suggested equipment schedule for interhospital critical care transport

Respiratory equipment
Intubation kit
Endotracheal tubes and connectors – adult and paediatric sizes
Introducers, bougies, Magill forceps
Laryngoscopes, blades, spare globes and batteries
Ancillaries: cuff syringe and manometer, clip forceps, ‘gooseneck’ tubing, heat moisture exchanger/filter(s), securing ties, lubricant
Alternative airways:
Simple: Guedel and nasopharyngeal
Supraglottic: laryngeal masks and/or Combitube
Infraglottic: cricothyrotomy kit and tubes
Oxygen masks (including high-FiO2 type), tubing, nebulisers
Suction equipment:
Main suction system – usually vehicle-mounted
Spare (portable) suction – hand, O2 or battery-powered
Suction tubing, handles, catheters and spare reservoir
Self-inflating hand ventilator, with masks and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) valve
Portable ventilator with disconnect and overpressure alarms
Ventilator circuit and spares
Spirometer and cuff manometer
Capnometer/capnograph.
Pleural drainage equipment:
Intercostal catheters and cannulae
Surgical insertion kit and sutures (see below)
Heimlich-type valves and drainage bags
Main oxygen system (usually vehicle-mounted) of adequate capacity with flowmeters and standard wall outlets
Portable/reserve oxygen system with flowmeter and standard outlet
Circulatory equipment
Defibrillator/monitor/external pacemaker, with leads, electrodes and pads
Intravenous fluid administration equipment:
Range of fluids: isotonic crystalloid, dextrose, colloids
High-flow and metered-flow giving sets
Intravenous cannulae in range of sizes: peripheral and central/long lines
Intravenous extension sets, three-way taps and needle-free injection system
Syringes, needles and drawing-up cannulae
Skin preparation wipes, intravenous dressings and BandAids
Pressure infusion bags (for arterial line also)
Blood pressure-monitoring equipment:
Arterial cannulae with arterial tubing and transducers
Invasive and non-invasive (automated) blood pressure monitors
Aneroid (non-mercury) sphygmomanometer and range of cuffs (preferably also compatible with non-invasive arterial blood pressure)
Pulse oximeter, with finger and multisite probes
Syringe/infusion pumps (minimum 2) and appropriate tubing
Miscellanous equipment
Urinary catheters and drainage/measurement bag
Gastric tubes and drainage bag
Minor surgical kit (for intercostal catheter, central venous lines, cricothyrotomy, etc.):
Sterile instruments: scalpels, scissors, forceps, needle holders
Suture material and needles
Antiseptics, skin preparation packs and dressings
Sterile gloves (various sizes); drapes ± gowns
Cervical collars, spinal immobilisation kit, splints
Pneumatic antishock garment (military antishock trousers (MAST) suit)
Thermometer (non-mercury) and/or temperature probe/monitor
Reflective (space) blanket and thermal insulation drapes
Bandages, tapes, heavy-duty scissors (shears)
Gloves and eye protection
Sharps and contaminated waste receptacles
Pen and folder for paperwork
Torch ± head light
Drug/additive labels and marker pen
Nasal decongestant (for barotitis prophylaxis)
Pharmacological agents
Central nervous system drugs:
Narcotics ± non-narcotic analgesics
Anxiolytics/sedatives
Major tranquillisers
Anticonvulsants
Intravenous hypnotics/anaesthetic agents
Antiemetics
Local anaesthetics
Cardiovascular drugs:
Antiarrhythmics
Anticholinergics
Inotropes/vasoconstrictors
Nitrates
α- and β-blockers; other hypotensives
Electrolytes and renal agents:
Sodium bicarbonate
Calcium (chloride)
Magnesium
Antibiotics
Oxytocics
Potassium
Loop diuretics
Osmotic diuretics
Endocrine and metabolic agents:
Glucose (concentrate) ± glucagon
Insulin
Steroids
Other agents:
Neuromuscular blockers: depolarising and non-depolarising
Anticholinesterases (neuromuscular block reversal)
Narcotic and benzodiazepine antagonists
Bronchodilators
Antihistamines
H2-blockers/proton pump inhibitors
Anticoagulants
Thrombolytics
Vitamin K
Tocolytics
Diluents (saline and sterile water)
Additional/optional equipment
Transvenous temporary pacing kit and pacemaker
Blood (usually O negative) and/or blood products
Additonal infusion pumps and associated intravenous sets
Obstetrics kit
Additional paediatric equipment (depending on capability of basic kit)
Antivenene (polyvalent or specific)
Specific drugs or antagonists

Transport monitors, infusion pumps and ventilators must work outside the transport vehicle. This requires equipment to be battery-powered and readily portable. Although newer monitors and other devices have rechargeable batteries with improved endurance, problems can still occur. The equipment-checking process includes different charging regimes. Nickel cadmium (NiCad) batteries need to be fully discharged before recharging to decrease memory effect, which reduces endurance, whereas sealed lead–acid or lithium batteries perform best when continually charged between uses.25

Internal batteries should not be relied upon unless transport duration is less than half the estimated battery life. For longer trips, a supplementary power source from either an external battery pack or the transport vehicle should be available to reduce battery use or even charge the batteries. An external supply combined with a wiring harness to run and recharge internal batteries on all devices is preferable. Spare batteries are not ideal, as many devices are not amenable to rapid ‘on-the-job’ battery swaps without interruption of monitoring and therapy.

Portability can be addressed in two ways. Equipment can be vehicle-mounted but readily detachable to accompany the patient, either as individual devices or more conveniently as a modular unit.26 Alternatively, a mobile intensive care module can be incorporated into the stretcher, either in the base27 or as a ‘stretcher bridge’ straddling the patient.28 Such designs are now widely used and allow the patient and equipment to be assembled into one unit at the referral point; this reduces loading and unloading time, ventilator and other device disconnections, and the risk of leaving equipment behind. Minor disadvantages include the increase in weight (25–30 kg), with corresponding reduction in maximum patient weight, and slight top-heaviness of the stretcher/patient combination.

MONITORING

Clinical observation by experienced personnel remains the mainstay of monitoring,10 but some clinical assessments such as auscultation are impossible during transit. Hence monitoring by appropriate equipment should be at the same level or a higher level than what the patient receives in the stationary setting. Referring institutions should not allow patients to be transported by teams with inferior monitoring capability. Compact transport monitors offering electrocardiogram (ECG), SpO2, non-invasive and multichannel invasive pressures, capnography and temperature monitoring have largely superseded older techniques, such as systolic pressure estimation by palpation and mean arterial pressure monitoring via an aneroid interface and gauge. These older techniques can still be used for back-up, as can defibrillators for ECG, while small hand-held pulse oximeters and EtCo2 detector are also available. Non-invasive blood pressure and pulse oximetry devices are susceptible to artefact29,30 and the use of invasive arterial monitoring or shielding pulse oximetry probes may be required. Mercury-containing devices are unsuitable, especially in aircraft. For longer transports, or patients with major biochemical or respiratory disturbances, compact biochemical and blood gas analysers may be valuable.31

VENTILATION AND RESPIRATORY SUPPORT

A mechanical ventilator should be used on all ventilated patients during transport. Manual ventilation occupies one team member fully and cannot reliably deliver constant tidal volumes and stable EtCo2.32 Transport ventilators are a compromise between portability and features.

The characteristics of an ideal transport ventilator are outlined in Table 4.2. No currently available transport ventilator meets all of these, and different models are optimised for different scenarios, so selection of a transport ventilator should take into account likely clinical and operational requirements. Back-up manual ventilation equipment must be available. In some cases of severe respiratory disease, a standard ICU ventilator may be needed. This may require medical air and AC power, although newer hybrid ICU/transport ventilators can provide enhanced ventilation capability without supply of these.33 Similar requirements will apply to transport of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Table 4.2 Features of an ideal transport ventilator

The provision of continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) in transport remains problematic. ‘Clapperboard’-type systems are economical on gas consumption, but being gravity-driven perform poorly during movement. Conventional CPAP systems have extremely high gas consumption, rendering them impractical except for short road transports. Electronically triggered CPAP is a feature of some newer transport ventilators; however, though they have been successfully used on occasions, poor performance with mask CPAP has been reported,34 and some patients may need to be converted to synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation or intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) for transport.

Maintenance of humidification of inspired gases is important during transport. In most cases, heat and moisture exchangers should provide adequate protection for intubated patients.35 In special circumstances, for example, in neonates and cystic fibrosis patients, it may be necessary to use active humidification.

A suction system and preferably a reserve are needed during all phases of transport. These may be Venturi systems, electrical-powered pumps or manual aspirators. Oxygen Venturi systems are lighter than electrical systems and outperform manual aspirators, but have high oxygen consumption, > 40 l/min.36

MODE OF TRANSPORT

Three types of transport vehicle are commonly employed: road, aeroplane (fixed-wing), and helicopter (rotary-wing). Basic requirements for critical care transport vehicles are listed in Table 4.3. Ideally, dedicated vehicles for all transport modes should be used, but the workload may not justify this and often vehicles that can be readily converted for mobile ICU use are seconded as required. The mode of transport depends on distances involved between referring and receiving hospitals and transport team locations; it also depends on the urgency of the case, which is often influenced by the clinical capability of the referring centre. Guidelines for vehicle utilisation should be developed but should have some flexibility for special circumstances, e.g. workload, traffic congestion, weather. Features and limitations of different modes of transport are summarised in Table 4.4.

Table 4.3 Essential features of transport vehicles

SAFETY AND TRAINING

Transport by any mode involves risk to staff and patients, and also imposes limitations on the delivery of care. In the aeromedical environment unfamiliar personnel perform clinical tasks poorly,39 so teams must be appropriately trained and equipped to function effectively and safely in each mode of transport. They need to be familiar with use of the various transport vehicles’ oxygen, suction, medical power, communications systems, and other equipment and stores. A senior member of their own professional group should train and accompany new personnel for several missions. Other specialist staff added to a team should receive a thorough safety brief and work under the direction of regular transport team members. Aeromedical crew training should encompass safety equipment, crash response, emergency egress and survival. Safety should be a foremost consideration in any transport. Activities that compromise road and air safety such as hazardous driving or flying below safe minima are not acceptable, and clinical teams must avoid attempting to coerce drivers or pilots to take risks. This has been recognised as a contributor to air ambulance accidents.40

ALTITUDE AND TRANSPORT PHYSIOLOGY

All transport modes result in increased noise, vibration, turbulence and accelerations in various or all axes (see Table 4.4). Personnel need to be aware of altitude-related complications that can occur with air transport. Increasing altitude results in decreasing oxygen partial pressure in accordance with Dalton’s law; while gas volumes increase or where volume change is restricted, relative increases in pressure occur in accordance with Boyle’s law (Table 4.5). Good introductory41,42 and more detailed43,44 aviation physiology texts are available.

PATIENT PREPARATION FOR TRANSPORT

The preparation phase for transport will depend on the patient’s diagnosis and condition. If possible, the patient should be stable; efforts, which may include surgery, should be undertaken to obtain stability. The exception would be a patient requiring time-critical intervention at the receiving hospital. These transports are riskier, but are likely to be less futile than attempting to stabilise an inevitably deteriorating patient. Prior to any transport all patients must have a secure airway, either self-maintained or intubated and ventilated, and intravenous access. Any external bleeding should be controlled. Urgent investigations (e.g. X-rays, arterial blood gases) should be obtained where indicated, and possible in the time available. The patient should be secured on the stretcher and connected to ventilators and monitoring commensurate to the degree of stability and time constraints. Infusions should be rationalised and sedation may need to be increased during the trip.

Intercostal drains, if present or placed, should be connected to Heimlich-type valves. If parenteral nutrition is discontinued, an appropriate dextrose infusion should be substituted, with interval blood glucose estimation.

Appropriate documentation, including a referral letter, results of investigations and hospital and ambulance observations, needs to accompany the patient. The team should ensure that any relevant legal requirements have been complied with and, where possible, consent for transport obtained.47 The final step prior to transport should be a series of checks, as listed in Table 4.6.

Table 4.6 Suggested predeparture checklists

A. Before leaving hospital
Patient identity and next of kin Recorded
Consent for transport Obtained and documented
Paperwork and X-rays Collected
Drugs for transport Present and sufficient
Emergency drugs/equipment Available
Medical equipment Collected and repacked
Monitors, ventilator and infusions Connected and on
Tubes, lines, drains and catheters Secured
Altitude request (if applicable) Passed to pilot
Receiving unit Contacted and updated
B. In-vehicle and predeparture
Stretcher and patient restraints Secured and checked
Oxygen supply On and sufficient
Monitors, ventilator and infusions Working and secure
Emergency drugs/equipment Stowed and accessible
Other medical packs Stowed
Intravenous fluids Hung and running
Intravenous injection port Accessible
Medical power On and connected
Communications Checked as applicable
Seatbelts On and checked
Staff/patient headsets On/checked (if applicable)

PATIENT CARE DURING TRANSPORT

If the patient is adequately prepared this phase should be uneventful. Special vigilance should be employed in the initial stages of movement, as this is the most likely time for either physiological decompensation or technical problems such as disconnections to occur. Once in the transport vehicle, a further set of checks is advisable (see Table 4.6). Therapy, monitoring and documentation should continue during transport. Transported patients are vulnerable to hypothermia, especially if intubated and/or paralysed and/or receiving multiple infusions.2,48 Active heating in transit may be possible using the vehicle heating, while passive heat conservation should be practised during loading and unloading. Transport crews should be restrained during transport. If a critical event occurs necessitating the crew leaving their seats, the driver or pilot should be informed.

Death in transport should be a rare occurrence.6,7 If it does occur, distance and the expectations and location of relatives should be taken into account in making the decision whether or not to continue transport to the destination. Carriage of relatives remains a controversial issue. For conscious patients, especially children, the presence of family members may have a beneficial effect. For unconscious patients it is less clear and needs to be balanced against space constraints in the mobile ICU vehicle, and the potential reaction of relatives in case of a critical event. Transport services should have policies in place both for carriage of relatives and for death in transit.

QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION AND RESEARCH

Critical care transport is a recent development where accepted standards and guidelines are still evolving.49 This means there is still considerable likelihood of problems, errors and critical incidents, with corresponding scope for research and quality improvement. This requires good clinical and operational data collection and patient outcomes. The process should be sensitive to the existence of system errors as well as individual patient, equipment or staff incidents. Preliminary results from the use of a critical incident monitoring system have been reported.13 Users of the service must be informed of recommendations and system changes resulting from this process. Innovation and research by staff involved in this area should be encouraged.

SPECIAL TRANSPORT SITUATIONS

PERINATAL TRANSPORT

This encompasses both in utero and extrauterine transport of the neonate. Specialised neonatal teams normally perform neonatal transport.50 Alternatively, part or all of the regular transport team may accompany specialist neonatal personnel. Neonatal transport stretchers are bulky and heavy, and require a vehicular power output of up to 250 W for the incubator and active humidifier as well as monitors, ventilator and infusion pumps. They also require a supply of medical air to allow precise regulation of FiO2.51 Transport of the pregnant patient carries the risk of precipitating labour, and in rare cases, delivery in transit.52 This is suboptimal, especially where the baby is premature or otherwise at risk. Where labour cannot be suppressed, consideration should be given to delivery at the referring hospital, with subsequent neonatal and maternal transport.

TRANSPORT OF DIVING-INJURY PATIENTS

Patients with decompression sickness or arterial gas embolus require expeditious transport to a recompression facility. This must be balanced against the risk of even small decreases in ambient pressure; even a 10-m (30-ft) increase in altitude can exacerbate pathogenesis.42 Divers with other problems such as marine animal envenomation or other medical conditions will still have increased total body nitrogen stores and can be at risk of developing evolved gas disorders during air transport. The use of transportable hyperbaric chambers has been reported53 but their use severely compromises speed of response, and therapy possible in transit. Transport at or very near sea-level cabin pressure on 100% oxygen is the usual procedure.

INTERNATIONAL AND LONG-DISTANCE TRANSPORTS

International transport of critically ill patients is becoming increasingly common. There are often complex medical, social and economic factors for returning patients to their own medical system. These must be balanced against the immigration, visa and logistic requirements, and medical problems of ultralong-distance transport.54 A physician-based team is less likely to have problems relating to drug carriage and status compared with a paramedical team. Logistic problems include carriage of sufficient supplies, and clinical staff to work shifts for prolonged transports. Pressure may be exerted to utilise cheaper regular passenger transport services instead of much more expensive air ambulances. Most international airlines will accept a stable seated patient, but there is considerable variation among airlines willing to carry stretcher patients and associated equipment. Such transports require considerable planning to arrange stretcher fitment and sufficient supplies of oxygen and electric power. A separate oxygen system for critical care transports is required as the aircraft’s emergency oxygen system is not permitted for patient care and the oxygen systems for in-flight use by passengers with medical conditions can only deliver up to 4 l/min.50 Airline engineering clearance of medical equipment is often required. Aircraft power needs to be negotiated or sufficient batteries carried. An air ambulance may be indicated for cases that are urgent, infective or require low cabin altitude, whereas stable post myocardial patients can be safely transported in commercial aircraft with appropriate escorts.55

CRITICAL CARE SCENE RESPONSES

Critical care teams offer a wide range of measures to complement standard prehospital providers, especially for major trauma, including: sedative/relaxant-assisted intubation; cricothyrotomy; tube thoracostomy; intravenous cutdown or central line insertion; and blood administration, as well as triage to an appropriate hospital.56 These teams are only useful for trapped patients in the urban setting,57 but combined with helicopter transport can improve outcomes in rural patients with blunt trauma.56,58,59 In these situations the team should include an experienced prehospital provider. With appropriate activation the team may reach the patient at the scene or supplement management at the local hospital.

Critical care teams may also be of value in disaster situations.60 Disaster medicine involves a change in emphasis to performing a small number of basic life-saving procedures on a large number of patients. Personnel with transport/prehospital experience are likely to be better trained and equipped to work at disaster scenes than traditional hospital disaster teams.61 The order of priority remains the same as traditional critical care transport: triage, treatment and then transport.

REFERENCES

1 Braman S, Dunn S, Amico CA, et al. Applications of intrahospital transport in critically ill patients. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:469-473.

2 Ridley S, Carter R. The effects of secondary transport on critically ill patients. Anaesthesia. 1989;44:822-827.

3 Duke GJ, Green JV. Outcome of critically ill patients undergoing interhospital transfer. Med J Aust. 2001;174:122-125.

4 Edge WE, Kantar RK, Weigle CG, et al. Reduction of morbidity in interhospital transport by specialised paediatric staff. Crit Care Med. 1994;22:186-191.

5 Hourihan F, Bishop G, Hillman KM, et al. The medical emergency team: a new strategy to identify and intervene in high risk patients. Clin Int Care. 1995;6:269-272.

6 Gilligan JE, Griggs WM, Jelly MT, et al. Mobile intensive care services in rural South Australia. Med J Aust. 1999;171:617-620.

7 Havill JH, Hyde PR, Forrest C. Transport of the critically ill: example of an integrated model. NZ Med J. 1995;108:378-380.

8 Flabouris A. Patient referral and transportation to a regional tertiary ICU: patient demographics, severity of illness and outcome comparison with non-transported patients. Anaesth Intens Care. 1999;27:385-390.

9 Bellingan G, Olivier T, Batson S, et al. Comparison of a specialist retrieval team with current United Kingdom practice for the transport of critically ill patients. Intens Care Med. 2000;26:740-744.

10 Goldsmith JC. The US health care system in the year 2000. JAMA. 1986;256:3371-3375.

11 Joint Faculty of Intensive Care, Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, and Australasian College of Emergency Medicine. Policy document IC10. Minimum Standards for Transport of Critically Ill Patients, 2003. Available online at www.anzca.edu.au/jficm/resources/policy/ic10_2003

12 Commission on Accreditation of Medical Transport Systems. Accreditation Standards. CAMTS: Anderson, SC, 1997.

13 Waydhas C. Intrahospital transport of critically ill patients. Crit Care. 1999;3:R83-R89.

14 Predictors of respiratory function deterioration after transfer of critically ill patients. Intens Care Med. 1998;24:1157-1162.

15 Kollef MH, Von Harz B, Prentice D, et al. Patient transport from intensive care increases the risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest. 1997;112:765-773.

16 ECRI. A new MRI complication. In Health Devices Alert. ECRI; 1988.

17 Flabouris A, Seppelt I. Optimal interhospital transport systems for the critically ill. In: Vincent JL, editor. 2001 Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2001:647-660.

18 Deane SA, Gaudry PL, Woods WPD, et al. Interhospital transfer in the management of acute trauma. Aust NZ J Surg. 1990;60:441-446.

19 Gentleman D, Jennett B. Hazards of interhospital transfer of comatose head injured patients. Lancet. 1981;2:853-855.

20 Beyer AJIIIrd, Land G, Zaritsky A. Non-physician transport of intubated paediatric patients: a system evaluation. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:961-966.

21 International Society of Aeromedical Services Australasian chapter. Aeromedical Standards. Arncliffe, Sydney: ISAS Australasia, 1993.

22 Benson AJ. Motion sickness. In: Ernsting J, King PF, editors. Aviation Medicine. Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford; 1988:318-338.

23 Lee A, Lum ME, Beehan SJ, et al. Interhospital transfers: decision making analysis in critical care areas. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:618-623.

24 New South Wales Health Department/Ambulance Service. Guidelines for Retrieval of the Critically Ill. Sydney: NSW Health Department, 1995.

25 Gates Energy Products Technical Marketing Staff. Rechargeable Batteries Applications Handbook. Stoneham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1992.

26 Noy-Man Y, Papa MZ, Margaliot SZ. Portable air mobile life support unit. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1985;56:598-600.

27 Grant-Thompson JC. The Mobile Intensive-care Rescue Facility (MIRF): a close look at the intensive care aeromedical evacuation capability. US Army Med Dept J. 1997;Sept–Oct:23-26.

28 Wishaw KJ, Munford BJ, Roby HP. The Care Flight stretcher bridge: a compact mobile intensive care module. Anaesth Intens Care. 1990;18:234-238.

29 Rutten AJ, Isley AH, Skowronski GA, et al. A comparative study of mean arterial blood pressure using automatic oscillometers, arterial cannulation, and auscultation. Anaesth Intens Care. 1986;14:58-65.

30 Lawless ST. Crying wolf: false alarms in a paediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1994;22:981-985.

31 Hankins DG, Herr DM, Santrach PJ, et al. Utilisation of a portable clinical analyser in air rescue. In: ADAC/International Society of Aeromedical Services AIRMED 96 Congress Report. Munich: Wolfsfellner Medizin Verlag; 1997:109-111.

32 Erler CJ, Rutherford WF, Rodman G, et al. Inadequate respiratory support in head injury patients. Air Med J. 1993;12:223-226.

33 Wong LS, McGuire NM. Laboratory assessment of the Bird T–Bird VS ventilator performance using a model lung. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84:811-817.

34 Porges KJ, Kelly SL. A comparison of the imposed work of breathing in continuous positive pressure ventilation mode between three different ventilators. Emerg Med. 1999;1:111-117.

35 Hedley RM, Allt-Graham J. Heat and moisture exchangers and breathing filters; a review. Br J Anaesth. 1994;73:227-236.

36 Russell WJ. Venturi suction. In Equipment for Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 2nd edn., Adelaide, SA: WJ Russell; 1997:27-29.

37 Mertlich G, Quaal SJ. Air transport of the patient requiring intra-aortic balloon pumping. Crit Care Nursing Clin North Am. 1989;1:443-458.

38 Schneider NS, Borok Z, Heller M, et al. Critical cardiac transport: air versus ground. Am J Emerg Med. 1988;6:449-452.

39 Harris BH. Performance of aeromedical crew members: training or experience? Am J Emerg Med. 1986;4:409-413.

40 National Transportation Safety Board (US) Safety Study: Commercial Emergency Medical Services Helicopter Operations. USA: NTSB, 1988. SS/88/01

41 Blumen IJ, Callejas S. Transport and physiology: a reference for air medical personnel. In: Blumen IJ, Lemkin DL, editors. Principles and Direction of Air Medical Transport. Salt Lake City, UT: Air Medical Physician Association; 2003:357-377.

42 Martin TE, Rodenberg HD. The physiological effects of altitude. In: Martin TE, Rodenberg HD, editors. Aeromedical Transportation: A Clinical Guide. Aldershot, UK: Avebury Aviation; 1996:37-54.

43 De Hart RL, editor. Fundamentals of Aerospace Medicine. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1985.

44 Ernsting J, King PF, editors. Aviation Medicine. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1988.

45 Thomas G, Brimacombe J. Function of the Drager Oxylog ventilator at high altitude. Anaesth Intens Care. 1994;22:276-280.

46 Edmonds C, Lowry C, Pennefather J, editors. Diving and Subaquatic Medicine, 3rd edn.. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 1992;186-187. 434–6

47 Dunn JD. Legal aspects of transfers. Problems Crit Care. 1990;4:447-448.

48 Fiege A, Rutherford WF, Nelson DR. Factors influencing patient thermoregulation in flight. Air Med J. 1996;15:18-23.

49 Robinson KJ, Kamin R. Quality improvement for transport programs. In: Principles and Direction of Air Medical Transport. Salt Lake City, UT: Air Medical Physician Association; 2003:148-156.

50 American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Interhospital Transport. Guidelines for Air and Ground Transport of Neonatal and Pediatric Patients. Elk Grove, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, 1993.

51 James AG. Neonatal resuscitation, stabilisation and emergency neonatal transportation. Intens Care World, 11. 1995, 53-57.

52 Low RB, Martin D, Brown C. Emergency air transport of pregnant patients: the national experience. Am J Emerg Med. 1988;6:41-48.

53 Gilligan JE, Gorman DF, Millar I. Use of an airborne recompression chamber and transfer under pressure to a major hyperbaric facility. In: Shields TG, editor. Proceedings of the XIV Meeting of the European Undersea Biomedical Society. Aberdeen, UK: European Undersea Biomedical Society, 1988. abstract (paper no. 5)

54 Munford BJ, Roby HP, Xavier X. Considerations in international air medical transport. In: Principles and Direction of Air Medical Transport. Salt Lake City, UT: Air Medical Physician Association; 2003:59-75.

55 Essebag V, Lutchmedial S, Churchill-Smith M. Safety of long distance aeromedical transport of the cardiac patient: a retrospective study. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2001;72:182-187.

56 Garner A, Rashford S, Lee A, et al. Addition of physicians to paramedic helicopter services decreases blunt trauma mortality. Aust NZ J Surg. 1999;69:697-700.

57 Hanrahan BJ, Munford BJ. Air medical scene re-sponse to the entrapped trauma patient. In: AIRMED 96. ADAC/International Society of Aeromedical Services Congress Report. Munich: Wolfsfellner Medizin Verlag; 1997:375-380.

58 Baxt WG, Moody P. The impact of a physician as part of the aeromedical prehospital team in patients with blunt trauma. JAMA. 1987;257:3246-3250.

59 Schmidt U, Scott BF, Nerlich ML, et al. On-scene helicopter transport of patients with multiple injuries – comparison of a German and American system. J Trauma. 1992;33:548-555.

60 Nocera A, Dalton AM. Disaster alert! The role of physician staffed helicopter emergency medical services. Med J Aust. 1994;161:689-692.

61 Garner A, Nocera A. Should New South Wales hospital disaster teams be sent to major incident sites? Aust NZ J Surg. 1999;69:702-707.