Thoracoscopic Approaches to the Spine

Published on 26/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurosurgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2471 times

CHAPTER 306 Thoracoscopic Approaches to the Spine

Minimally invasive surgery has become a major goal across surgical subspecialties. Issues as diverse as cost containment, wound aesthetics, and decreased pain have all served as an impetus to refine these techniques. Technologic advances have helped to make these procedures safe, viable options for a wide variety of pathologies.

Advances in endoscopic imaging devices have played an important role in the development of minimally invasive surgery. Endoscopic image resolution now far surpasses that previously obtained because of improved technology such as computer interfacing, optical chips, fiberoptic cables, video endoscopy, and three-dimensional (3-D) imaging. Endoscopes provide illumination, visualization, magnification, and a conduit to access areas of the human nervous system as diverse as the ventricular system and spine.

Endoscopic techniques in spinal surgery are now common for a variety of pathologies: posterolateral percutaneous approaches to the lumbar disk spaces and neural foramina, anterior laparoscopic and anterolateral retroperitoneal endoscopic approaches to the lumbar spine, and thoracoscopic approaches to the thoracic spine.114 Typically, rigid rod-lens endoscopes are used to visualize the anatomy and pathology; however, flexible fiberoptic endoscopes have also been used to inspect small spaces such as the neural foramina and syringomyelia cavities.710,13,15 The resolution and image quality of flexible fiberoptic endoscopes are poorer than that of rigid endoscopes.

Endoscopes have found a valuable place in the treatment of thoracic spinal disorders. Thoracoscopy was first widely employed by cardiothoracic surgeons, and the techniques for thoracoscopic spinal surgery are adapted from their methodologies.1619 Today, thoracoscopic surgical techniques are used to perform sympathectomies, discectomies, and vertebrectomies; to correct deformities; to stabilize spine fractures after trauma; and to biopsy and resect tumors.

Historical Overview

Beginning in the early 1900s, thoracoscopy was used as a diagnostic tool to evaluate pleural disease.2023 During the late 1980s, techniques and instrumentation for endoscopic surgical procedures improved dramatically. In the early 1990s, thoracoscopic techniques were refined and applied to a broad spectrum of pathologies involving the thorax.1619

Today, many thoracic procedures previously performed via a thoracotomy are routinely performed thoracoscopically. These procedures include biopsy or resection of pleural or lung lesions, lymph node biopsy, biopsy and resection of mediastinal masses, lobectomy, pneumonectomy, pleural sclerotherapy, treatment of blebs, esophageal procedures, and sympathectomy.161924 In the resection of pulmonary lesions,2426 the small thoracoscopic incisions have minimized dissection and retraction of the chest wall, reduced postoperative pain, decreased blood loss, shortened intensive care unit and overall hospital stays, improved postoperative pulmonary and shoulder function, hastened recovery times, and decreased complications.1619,2426

The techniques of thoracoscopic spine surgery were independently developed by Regan and coworkers3,6 in the United States and by Rosenthal and colleagues5,27 in Germany. The first report of thoracoscopy for spinal diseases was published by Mack and coworkers28 who described 10 patients with diverse spinal pathology effectively treated thoracoscopically without major complications. Rosenthal and associates5 and Horowitz and coworkers4 published separate reports that described the techniques for performing thoracic microdiscectomy thoracoscopically. Since then, numerous reports have demonstrated the effectiveness of thoracoscopic spinal surgery for the treatment of a wide variety of spinal disorders.16,2931

Indications

Thoracoscopy can be used to access the sympathetic chain, disks, vertebral bodies, and the ipsilateral pedicle; however, it cannot be used to access the posterior elements of the spine. Thoracoscopic approaches have been used to treat herniated thoracic disks2628; to drain vertebral epidural abscesses; to débride vertebral osteomyelitis and diskitis; to decompress fractures; to biopsy and resect neoplasms1328; and to perform vertebrectomies and interbody fusions, vertebral body reconstructions and instrumentation,13,28,30 sympathectomies,3234 and anterior releases for the treatment of kyphosis and scoliosis (Table 306-1).2,3,6,28,30

Table 306-1 Potential Indications for Thoracoscopic Spinal Surgery

Costotransversectomy, thoracotomy, and thoracoscopy are the three major techniques available to address thoracic vertebral and disk pathologies. Each technique has distinct advantages and disadvantages (Table 306-2). When the ventral aspect of the dura must be visualized well, an anterior transthoracic approach (thoracotomy or thoracoscopy) is necessary. This significantly improves visualization of the ventral surfaces of the spine and spinal cord to facilitate decompression, reconstruction, and internal fixation compared with posterolateral approaches.3544 For lateral pathologies, a costotransversectomy, transpedicular approach, or other such posterolateral approaches may be considered.

Thoracoscopic Technique

Operating Room Setup and Patient Positioning

A radiolucent operating table is used so that fluoroscopic images can be obtained intraoperatively. Initially, the patient is placed supine on the operating room table while a double-lumen endotracheal tube is placed. Fiberoptic bronchoscopic equipment should be kept in the room should the endotracheal tube need to be repositioned or the patient suctioned during the procedure. Typically, the anesthesiologist is positioned at the head of the operating table (Fig. 306-1). An arterial line, central venous and urinary catheters, and pneumatic compression stockings are placed. Somatosensory and/or motor evoked potential leads are connected and baseline recordings are obtained before the patient is positioned.

The patient is then turned and placed in a lateral decubitus position with the operative side up. During a thoracoscopic procedure, the deflated lung is allowed to reexpand several minutes each hour to decrease the chance of the patient developing symptomatic atelectasis after surgery.

A foam axillary roll is used to pad the dependent axilla. The legs are flexed at the knees, and the hips and shoulder are firmly secured to the operating table so that the patient can be tilted safely during surgery. The patient’s dependent arm is placed on a padded arm board, and the upper arm is elevated on a pillow or secured via a sling or ether screen. Abduction of the upper arm moves the scapula dorsally and increases exposure of the chest wall.

Intraoperative image intensification (C arm) is positioned to obtain a clear anteroposterior view of the thoracic spine to verify the appropriate level before the skin is marked with indelible ink. Preoperative markings on the skin include the position of the portals, scapula, and potential thoracotomy incision. The patient’s entire chest, axillary region, proximal arm, back, and abdomen are then sterilely scrubbed, prepared, and draped. During the procedure the surgeon and assistant stand anterior to the patient facing the anterior thorax. Ideally, two video monitors are used, one across the operating table for viewing by the surgeons, and the other positioned for the scrub nurse.

Portal Insertion

Depending on the procedure, two to four portals are inserted to gain access to the thoracic cavity (Fig. 306-2). The portals should be spread far enough apart so that the surgeon’s hands are neither too close together nor too close to the endoscope. The working portals (for instruments) are best positioned anterolaterally between the anterior and middle axillary lines. The endoscope portal is best positioned posterolaterally between the middle and posterior axillary line. This technique allows the surgeon’s hands to rest comfortably during the procedure. The axilla and first and second interspaces are never entered to avoid injury to the brachial plexus and great vessels, respectively. Exposure from T9 to T12 requires caudal retraction of the diaphragm to expose the costophrenic recess. This exposure can be enhanced by a reverse Trendelenburg position and a fan retractor.

When a 0-degree angled endoscope is used, the portal is placed directly over the spinal segment of interest. When a 30-degree angled endoscope is used, the portal position must be offset above or below the level of pathology and the scope angled obliquely.

The position of the portals are triangulated over the region of the pathology and ideally evenly spaced rostral and caudal to the surgical target. If needed, a fan retractor can be placed between the anterior and middle axillary lines, rostral or caudal to the working portals.

Flexible portals are used in thoracoscopic spinal procedures to prevent injury to the intercostal nerves. Portals serve to keep blood and debris off the endoscope and instruments. An 11- or 15-mm portal is adequate for most purposes. A smaller portal can be used for a suction-irrigation tool (7 mm). A larger portal is needed when bone grafts or instrumentation are to be placed.

Before the portals are placed, the skin is infiltrated and an intercostal nerve block is administered with a local anesthetic (1% bupivicaine [Marcaine] with epinephrine). The skin is incised parallel to the superior surface of the rib to prevent injury to the neurovascular bundle. A hemostat is passed through the intercostal muscles and parietal pleura directly adjacent to the superior surface of the rib. A finger can be inserted to check for lung adhesions that would preclude the introduction of a portal at that site. Portals are placed over a rigid trocar, which is immediately removed after the portals have been placed (Fig. 306-3). The proximal end of the portal is stapled or sutured to the skin to anchor it to the chest wall during surgery.

The endoscope is placed after the first portal is inserted. Additional portals are placed under direct endoscopic visualization. Small adhesions can be addressed with sharp or blunt dissection techniques; however, dense, diffuse adhesions usually preclude thoracoscopic access and require conversion to a thoracotomy.

Thoracic Endoscopic Sympathectomy

Several clinical syndromes that result from a pathologically elevated sympathetic tone can be treated surgically by thoracic sympathectomy. These entities include palmar or axillary hyperhidrosis, pain syndromes involving the upper extremities such as reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD), ischemic syndromes of the hand such as Raynaud’s disease, and malignant tachyarrhythmias refractory to medical management. The second, third, and sometimes fourth sympathetic ganglia are thought to be the primary mediators of these disease processes. Traditionally, the second thoracic ganglion is considered to be the key ganglion for sympathetic denervation of the upper extremity.2 Thoracic endoscopic sympathectomy, a technique first described about 50 years ago,3 provides an appealing alternative for patients with conditions that are treatable by sympathetic denervation.

Surgical Indications

Several major groups of disorders can be treated by thoracoscopic sympathectomy (Table 306-4) and contraindications for the procedure are few. Idiopathic (essential) palmar hyperhidrosis is the most common indication for thoracoscopic sympathectomy. Most patients who receive a neurosurgical referral for this condition have been evaluated for metabolic (hyperthyroidism) or neoplastic causes and have failed efforts at medical management with topical and anticholinergic agents.

Table 306-4 Indications for Sympathectomy

From Dickman CA, Baskin JJ, Theodore N. Thoracic endoscopic sympathectomy. In: Fessler RG, Sekhar LN, eds. Atlas of Neurosurgical Techniques. New York: Thieme; 2006.

In clinical series, the success rate of sympathectomy for permanent relief of palmar hyperhidrosis ranges from 90% to 100%.33,34,4547,51,5458,62,64 Axillary hyperhidrosis and bromhidrosis (axillary malodor) can also be addressed through a sympathectomy that targets the T3 and T4 ganglia.5 Associated plantar hyperhidrosis often (50%) resolves when hyperhidrosis of the upper extremities is relieved and is referred to as a dividend benefit of the procedure because it is not an expected effect of transecting the upper thoracic sympathetic chain.

RSD (also known as complex regional pain syndrome type I)56 is one of a number of pain syndromes that typically follow trauma. Current evidence suggests that an upregulated sensitivity of α adrenoreceptors for catecholamines in the injured limb reduces RSD. Medical therapy tends to be ineffective in terms of both the degree and duration of relief. Patients who experience symptomatic relief after percutaneous blocks of the stellate ganglion with local anesthetic agents are considered candidates for surgical sympathectomy.33,49,5456 Long-term clinical benefits have been reported for this indication in more than 50% of patients.2

Patients with severe upper extremity ischemia due to Raynaud’s disease or related disorders may also benefit from sympathectomy.33,49,5456 Although the ischemic process is typically progressive, sympathectomy can be used to avoid limb amputation and to improve the associated complaints of pains.

Sympathectomy has also been shown to effectively relieve pain related to pancreatic carcinoma via left T5 through T11 lesioning,59 as well as treating patients with increased QT intervals via T1 through T4 lesioning.60,61

Patient Positioning

With the patient in the lateral decubitus position, the bed is rotated approximately 40 degrees toward the surgeon, which allows gravity to retract the lung and brings the thoracic vertebral column within view. A mild reverse Trendelenburg position allows the lung to fall away from the apex of the pleural cavity.

Two incisions are used. The first 5-mm diameter portal is placed in the middle or posterior axillary line within the fourth or fifth intercostal space (Fig. 306-4). The 5-mm-diameter rigid rod-lens thoracoscope is passed through this portal. A second 5-mm portal incision is placed in the anterior axillary line within the third intercostal space. The 5-mm-diameter endoscopic monopolar scissors are passed into the thoracic cavity. Gently patting the deflated lung with an endoscopic dissection tool produces further atelectasis and improves the visualization of the spinal column.

Sympathectomy

At the levels of interest, the sympathetic chain is transected using the monopolar cauterization scissors (Fig. 306-6). We routinely isolate the T2 ganglia for palmar hyperhidrosis by transecting the sympathetic chain over the second and third rib heads, and include the T3 and T4 ganglia for axillary hyperhidrosis. In our experience, outcomes with this technique are comparable to those obtained following an en bloc resection of the sympathetic chain. Because the sympathetic chain does not have to be dissected away from the vertebral column, this modified procedure is safer and faster to perform. The scissors are used to hook and elevate the sympathetic ganglia away from the rib head. Centering the dissection directly over the rib head protects the intercostal nerve.

The effectiveness of the sympathectomy is judged intraoperatively by monitoring palmar skin temperature. A unilateral increase of 1° to 3° C occurs when an adequate sympathectomy has been performed.5 This increase in temperature typically occurs over 10 to 20 minutes. If palmar skin temperature fails to increase, the presence of an aberrant accessory sympathetic supply that is still functional must be sought. Another possibility is that the inferior third of the stellate ganglion is contributing sympathetic input that needs to be addressed.

Surgical Outcomes

The success rate of endoscopic sympathectomy is highest for treating palmar hyperhidrosis. Several series have reported success rates between 95% and 100%.* Lesioning the sympathetic chain with a subsequent increase in the intraoperative palmar temperature of at least 3° C has provided the best immediate and long-term clinical outcomes. Axillary hyperhidrosis and bromhidrosis will improve in 80% of patients who undergo lesioning of the T3 and T4 ganglia.5

Complications

In a significant number of patients, sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis can cause a postoperative compensatory hyperhidrosis syndrome (CHS), which involves increased sweating of the chest, abdomen, legs, and/or back (nondenervated areas).67,68,72 CHS symptoms typically improve or resolve within 6 months of surgery.53 The incidence of CHS after sympathectomy ranges between 40% and 75%.71 Many studies have shown that preservation of the T2 ganglion may reduce the incidence of CHS.66,68,69,72 Compared with T2-4 sympathectomy in one randomized study of 232 patients, bilateral T3 sympathectomy was associated with a lower incidence of severe CHS and with superior patient satisfaction. In both groups symptoms resolved completely in all patients.65 Other studies have proposed that T4 sympathectomy may decrease the incidence of CHS even further, although the recurrence rate of symptoms also increased.70,71 Most patients who develop CHS have mild or moderate sweating and are satisfied with the relief of their palmar sweating. Only 5% to 10% of patients who develop CHS have severe sweating that creates a disabling problem.

Horner’s syndrome is avoided by sparing the rostral stellate ganglia and usually resolves spontaneously even if it does occur. Electrical or mechanical stimulation of this structure causes pupillary dilation that can be observed by the anesthesiologist. Gustatory sweating has been reported in 1% to 2% of patients.

Thoracic Endoscopic Diskectomy, Vertebrectomy, And Reconstruction

Thoracic Spinal Anatomy

The middle of the thoracic vertebral body has a slightly concave surface (Fig. 306-7). The segmental arteries and veins course over the middle of the vertebral bodies. The disk spaces and end plates form a convex surface. Intraoperatively, the surface contours are important clues for determining anatomic relationships.

The pedicles are dense oval cylinders of bone with a cancellous center. The pedicles are adjacent to the upper third of the vertebral body. The relationship of the pedicle to the disk space, vertebral body, and spinal canal is critical for intraoperative anatomic orientation. The neural foramen is formed by the boundaries of the pedicles of two adjacent vertebrae. Within the neural foramen, the nerve roots are surrounded by a large amount of epidural fat, a rich epidural venous plexus, and radicular arteries. The dura is therefore best exposed by removing the thoracic pedicles rather than by entering the neural foramen. The upper surface of the pedicle is contiguous with the superior surface of the vertebral end plates. Tracing the upper surface of the pedicle anteriorly leads to the disk space.

The rib heads provide essential landmarks for localization. The sympathetic ganglia and sympathetic chain are located just lateral to the rib heads beneath the parietal pleura. The ribs articulate with the transverse processes and the pedicles by strong ligamentous attachments. The rib head, which articulates with the base of the pedicle and the vertebral body just caudal to or at the level of the disk space, serves to orient the surgeon to the relative position of the disk space and pedicles. The T9 rib, for example, leads to the T8-9 disk space. The costovertebral joint is a shallow ball-and-socket type joint with a glistening surface that is a helpful anatomic feature for verifying that the rib head has been resected completely.

The costovertebral triangle is the key to unlocking the spinal canal and visualizing the nerve roots, dura, and spinal cord. It is defined by the space between where the rib joins the transverse process and the vertebral body. The surface of the pedicle is exposed by removing the proximal 2 to 3 cm of rib en bloc. The pedicle is then removed to unlock the lateral aspect of the thecal sac. Removing the pedicle early in the dissection allows the dura to be visualized clearly so the surgeon can remain oriented to the position of the spinal cord during dissection.

A predictable anatomic relationship exists among the intercostal vein, artery, and nerve. The segmental artery and vein course over the middle of the concave surface of the vertebral body. At the neural foramen, the segmental nerve joins the segmental vessels. As the neurovascular bundle extends laterally, from cephalad to caudal, the vein, artery, and nerve run in the groove on the undersurface of each rib (see Fig. 306-7C).

Thoracic Microdiskectomy

After the pathologic disk space is exposed and confirmed by intraoperative radiography, the pleura over the medial surface of each rib is incised. Cobb periosteal elevators are used to expose a 2- to 3-cm segment of the proximal rib and rib head. The neurovascular bundle and muscular attachments are detached from the rib margins using subperiosteal dissection with periosteal elevators and large curved curets. The neurovascular bundle is detached from the undersurface of the rib with careful dissection using curved curets. Bleeding from the intercostal artery or vein encountered during rib dissection is controlled with bipolar cauterization. The intercostal nerve is identified and preserved.

A Cobb periosteal elevator and curved curets are used to divide the costotransverse and costovertebral ligaments sharply. The rib head is detached from its articulation with the vertebral body and all soft tissues are removed (Fig. 306-8A). A rib-cutting tool or the Midas Rex drill with an R-8 bit or footplate attachment (R-1) is used to create an osteotomy to transect the rib. The rib head and the proximal rib are removed en bloc. Enough of the proximal rib should be removed to ensure that the disk space, pedicle, and foramen are exposed satisfactorily.

The amount of the pedicle that needs to be resected depends on the extent and location of herniated disk material. If the herniation is confined to the level of the disk space, only the superior half of the pedicle of the caudal vertebrae is removed. If the disk is broad-based or situated caudally, the entire pedicle must be resected. By removing the pedicle, the lateral aspect of the thecal sac is exposed. This visualization is critical because it enables the surgeon to protect the dura and spinal cord. Typically, the pedicle of the caudal vertebrae adjacent to the disk space must be removed. If the T9-10 disk is being removed, the T10 pedicle is resected. The pedicle is removed with a combination of drills and Kerrison rongeurs.

After the dura has been identified, the diskectomy is performed. The annulus fibrosus of the involved disk space is incised first. The thoracic disk spaces are very narrow, and the annulus is best incised with a Cobb periosteal elevator. A drill with a cutting bur is used to create a cavity 1 to 2 cm wide in the dorsal vertebral bodies adjacent to the disk space (Fig. 306-8B). Herniated disk material can then be curetted into the cavity and away from the spinal cord. Creating the cavity within the disk space and along the dorsal vertebrae minimizes the entry of tools into the compromised epidural space. Microsurgical tools and small curets are used to move the herniated disk material away from the spinal canal into the cavity. Calcified disk material or osteophytes can be removed with a fine-tipped drill. The depth of the decompression is assessed by direct visualization and can be verified with intraoperative radiographs or fluoroscopic images. The decompression can be extended completely across the ventral aspect of the dura to the contralateral pedicle. Although interbody fusion is usually unnecessary after a routine thoracoscopic diskectomy, the proximal rib harvested during the spinal exposure can be used for this purpose if needed.

Thoracic Corpectomy

The exposure for thoracic corpectomy is similar to that for thoracic microdiscectomy. First, the pleura is dissected widely from the surface of the involved vertebrae and the adjacent ribs. The segmental vessels are mobilized, occluded with hemoclips, and cut between the clips. A circumferential subperiosteal dissection of the proximal 2 to 3 cm of the adjacent ribs is performed. The neurovascular bundle is dissected from the undersurface of the proximal ribs. The ligamentous attachments of the ribs are sectioned, osteotomies are performed, and the ribs are removed (Fig. 306-9A). The pedicles of the involved vertebrae are removed with a Kerrison rongeur carefully exposing the lateral aspect of the dura and nerve roots. Diskectomies are performed to define the cephalad and caudal boundaries of the bone dissection (Fig. 306-9B). A large cavity is created within the center of the involved vertebral body with a high-speed drill, osteotomes, curets, and rongeurs. The posterior longitudinal ligament and any elements compressing the spinal cord can be clearly visualized and safely removed by curetting the material away from the spinal cord into the cavity created within the vertebrae (Fig. 306-9C). This sequence of dissection enables the dura to be visualized throughout the procedure and maximizes its safety. A strut graft can be placed within the corpectomy defect as detailed below.

Vertebral Reconstruction

After thoracic corpectomy, a variety of options exists for stabilization. Osseous defects from a corpectomy can be reconstructed using autologous iliac crest struts, allograft bone shafts (Fig. 306-10A), or methylmethacrylate. Autologous rib or a whole-diameter (allograft) humerus shaft usually fits well within the thoracic vertebrectomy site. The length, width, and depth of the bone graft and the vertebrectomy defect are measured precisely. Before the defect is measured and the graft is inserted, the spinous processes are pushed forward externally at the apex of the patient’s kyphosis to optimize spinal alignment. The bone graft is sized to the exact length of the vertebrectomy defect. One end of the graft is cut with a slightly beveled surface to allow the graft to be wedged into position. The bone graft is inserted end-on through a 20-mm flexible portal into the thoracic cavity. The bone graft is grasped with an endoscopic clamp and positioned into the vertebrectomy defect. Bone graft impactors and mallets are used to compress the bone grafts precisely into the vertebrectomy bed. The relationship of the graft to the dura must be observed throughout the insertion of the graft. This relationship can be confirmed with intraoperative radiography.

Another method of spinal stabilization that can be used for neoplastic disease is methylmethacrylate reconstruction (Fig. 306-10B, C). After the dimensions of the resection defect have been measured, a sterile Silastic tube is cut 5 to 6 mm longer than the end plates at the margin of the vertebrectomy defect. Holes are made in the adjacent vertebral end plates with drills and curets to fit the tube diameter. The Silastic tube, which serves as a template for the methylmethacrylate until it sets, is telescoped into the bodies of the adjacent vertebrae. A hole is cut in the middle of the tube to allow injection of methylmethacrylate. A long, wide-bore needle with a pressure syringe is used to inject the methylmethacrylate. Slow-setting cranioplasty methylmethacrylate is preferred to rapid-setting methacrylate because it allows the polymer to be injected and produces much less heat as it sets, minimizing the risk of injury to the spinal cord. The methylmethacrylate is injected until it completely fills the Silastic tubing and seeps through the ends into the adjacent vertebrae. The Silastic tube acts like a mold while the methylmethacrylate hardens. Extrusion of the methacrylate into the adjacent bone is mandatory to provide an anchor that will prevent the polymer from loosening or becoming displaced. Additional methacrylate can be added ventral and lateral to the tube; however, care should be taken to ensure that the dura and spinal cord are not compressed by the polymer.

These reconstructive techniques can be augmented with screw-plate devices applied thoracoscopically or with posterior instrumentation constructs.

Thoracic Endoscopic Resection of Thoracic Tumors

Indications

Thoracoscopy may be used in place of thoracotomy for the resection of certain intrathoracic neoplasms such as paraspinal neurogenic tumors.66 Such tumors are benign in more than 95% of cases.65,72 Although uncommon, they compose 75% of posterior mediastinal masses and 10% to 34% of mediastinal tumors.68,69 These tumors arise from two cell types, nerve sheaths and autonomic ganglia. The former includes schwannomas and neurofibromas, whereas the latter includes ganglioneuromas, neuroblastomas, ganglioneuroblastomas, and paragangliomas. Although most tumors are discovered incidentally, patients may become symptomatic with dyspnea, shortness of breath, pain, Horner’s syndrome, pneumonia, and hoarseness. The purpose of resection includes obtaining a tissue diagnosis, preventing tumor growth within the spinal canal, relieving mass effect within the chest, and preventing malignant transformation.

Endoscopic resection of neoplasms entails piecemeal removal of the tumor through the ports. Given the need to minimize seeding of malignant cells via en bloc resection, malignancy is a contraindication. Furthermore, malignant tumors can be poorly demarcated and can invade or encase blood vessels, mediastinal structures, and bone. An open thoracotomy should be used. Intradural tumors are unamenable to thoracoscopic resection. Dumbbell tumors, however, may be resected via a staged procedure combining a posterior laminectomy followed by thoracoscopy.

Operative Technique

A double-lumen endotracheal tube is used to facilitate deflation of the ipsilateral lung. The patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position and secured to the table in anticipation of rotation. The upper arm is abducted to 90 degrees. Port placement depends on the location of the tumor, as determined by fluoroscopy. Portals are triangulated, with the viewing portal along the posterior axillary line and the suction and working portals along the anterior axillary line. A fourth portal for diaphragm retraction also may be necessary.

Once the tumor is visualized, visceral, vascular, and neuronal structures must be identified and protected. If the tumor includes a cystic component, a long needle can be inserted to decompress the lesion. The parietal pleura is incised, opened widely, and mobilized from the margins of the tumor. Sharp and blunt dissection are used to separate the tumor capsule from the surrounding normal tissues. Bipolar cauterization is used to coagulate the vascular supply to the tumor.

If the tumor is located peripherally along an intercostal nerve, the proximal and distal segments of that nerve are identified by using subperiosteal dissection to mobilize the neurovascular bundle from the rib. The intercostal nerve is sectioned proximally and distally. Stumps of normal nerve are left attached to the tumor to be used as handles by which to manipulate it as the lesion is mobilized circumferentially. The tumor is mobilized by debulking the internal portion by cystic aspiration and solid-piecemeal resection while folding the edges away from the adjacent vascular and visceral structures and identifying the pleural boundaries.

When a nerve sheath tumor extends into the neural foramen, extensive manipulation of the tumor should be avoided to prevent traction on the foraminal component of the tumor, which could result in avulsion of the proximal thoracic nerve root and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage or spinal cord injury. Once the distal portion is mobilized, it may be sectioned at the neural foramen.

The intraforaminal component is then resected by exposing the dura mater and nerve root sleeve to allow placement of a suture ligature or hemoclip proximally to prevent CSF leakage. The tumor may be cauterized to reduce its size. Once the dura and normal proximal nerve root are identified and the nerve root sleeve is ligated, the nerve root is amputated distal to the ligature. Next, the distal root stump attached to the remaining tumor component is removed.

If the tumor is found to penetrate the dura intraoperatively, the dura is closed using a ligature, and the intradural portion of the tumor can be resected via a laminectomy. However, if the presence of an intradural component is noted on preoperative imaging, it is preferable to treat this portion first via a posterior or posterolateral approach prior to thoracoscopy. A thoracoscopic approach is performed during a second stage if a large component remains in the thoracic cavity. The dura is then inspected, and a Valsalva maneuver is performed to exclude the presence of a CSF leak. Negative thoracic pressure during respiration can perpetuate a CSF leak postoperatively. Therefore, if a CSF leak persists, fibrin glue combined with a fascial patch graft can be used, and a lumbar drain can be placed. In such situations, if a chest tube is needed, it should be used only briefly. The amount of suction should be kept at or less than 5 cm H2O.

Once the tumor has been resected and removed piecemeal through the portal, the resection bed is inspected and hemostasis is obtained. When possible, the pleura is closed using hemoclips. A chest tube is inserted and the lung is reinflated. Often, the chest tube may be removed immediately postoperatively after a chest x-ray confirms absence of a pneumothorax.

Complications

The potential complications of thoracoscopic spinal surgery include pneumothorax, hemothorax, chylothorax, atelectasis, pneumonia, neurologic injury, intercostal neuralgia, infection, spinal instability, hardware- or fixation-related complications, or injury to the great vessels or contents of the mediastinum. Postoperative atelectasis and pneumonia can be minimized by temporarily reinflating the lung intraoperatively. We recommend ventilating the lung for 10 minutes for every 2 hours of surgical time. Postoperatively, patients are routinely placed on aggressive pulmonary physiotherapy regimens. If no intraoperative pulmonary complications occur and there is no air leak or excessive drainage through the thoracostomy tube, it can usually be removed either immediately after surgery or within 24 hours.

Vascular injury requiring conversion to an open procedure is rare and can be minimized by defining the regional anatomy with the endoscope before the instruments are placed. Pneumothorax requiring replacement of a chest tube is rare as long as the visceral pleura of the lung is not violated. Intercostal neuralgia is avoided by minimizing dissection and traction against the neurovascular bundle.

Cardiac arrhythmias are prevented by avoiding monopolar cauterization near the heart, and pulmonary lacerations are avoided by minimizing or preventing lung retraction and by using blunt fan retractors carefully. The fan retractors should only be opened or closed when visualized directly with the endoscope and after they have been removed from the surface of the lung. Radicular and spinal cord injuries are prevented by meticulous dissection techniques under direct visualization.

Conclusion

The advantage of thoracoscopic techniques for extensive spinal decompression and reconstruction procedures is that they minimize the disruption of the superficial thoracic soft tissues. Previously, operative procedures for anterior thoracic spinal pathology were performed exclusively with thoracotomy or costotransversectomy through large incisions. Although the basic anatomy and the dissection techniques of open thoracic surgery are familiar to most spine surgeons, distinct technical challenges accompany thoracoscopic surgery. These challenges include significant adaptations of conventional surgical techniques: longer tools, restricted access to the surgical site, and new methods of visualizing and magnifying the operative site. Technologic improvements in endoscopic optical resolution and in the development of new tools have facilitated the application of endoscopic surgical approaches to the treatment of a broad spectrum of spinal disorders.

Thoracoscopy is more appropriately termed minimally incisional surgery rather than minimally invasive surgery because the same, extensive amount of spinal dissection is performed as with open surgery. It is, however, achieved through smaller incisions and without extensive retraction. Neural decompression, interbody fusion, vertebral body reconstruction, and internal fixation can be performed with these minimally incisional thoracoscopic techniques. Thoracoscopic spinal surgery has tremendous potential for improving patients’ comfort and cosmetic outcomes and for shortening recovery times.

Suggested Readings

Barrenechea IJ, Fukumoto R, Lesser JB, et al. Endoscopic resection of thoracic paravertebral and dumbbell tumors. Neurosurgery. 2006;59:1195-1201.

Choi BC, Lee YC, Sim SB. Treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis by endoscopic clipping of the upper part of the T4 sympathetic ganglion. Preliminary results. Clin Auton Res. 2003;13(suppl 1):I48-I51.

Chou SH, Kao EL, Li HP, et al. T4 sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: an effective approach that simultaneously minimizes compensatory hyperhidrosis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2005;21:310-313.

Cloward RB. Hyperhydrosis. J Neurosurg. 1969;30:545-551.

Dickman CA, Karahalios DG. Thoracoscopic spinal surgery. Clin Neurosurg. 1995;43:392-422.

Dickman CA, Mican C. Thoracoscopic approaches for the treatment of anterior thoracic spinal pathology. BNI Q. 1996;12:4-19.

Dickman CA, Mican CA. Multilevel anterior thoracic discectomies and anterior interbody fusion using a microsurgical thoracoscopic approach. J Neurosurg. 1996;84:104-109.

Dickman CA, Rosenthal D, Karahalios DG, et al. Thoracic vertebrectomy and reconstruction using a microsurgical thoracoscopic approach. Neurosurgery. 1996;38:279-293.

Fidler MW, Goedhart ZD. Excision of prolapse of thoracic intervertebral disc. A transthoracic technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66:518-522.

Han PP, Kenny K, Dickman CA. Thoracoscopic approaches to the thoracic spine: experience with 241 surgical procedures. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:S88-S95.

Hazelrigg SR, Landreneau RJ, Boley TM, et al. The effect of muscle-sparing versus standard posterolateral thoracotomy on pulmonary function, muscle strength, and postoperative pain. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;101:394-401.

Kambin P, Schaffer JL. Percutaneous lumbar discectomy. Review of 100 patients and current practice. Clin Orthop. 1989;238:24-34.

Kao MC, Tsai JC, Lai DM, et al. Autonomic activities in hyperhidrosis patients before, during, and after endoscopic laser sympathectomy. Neurosurgery. 1994;34:262-268.

Kao MC. Video endoscopic sympathectomy using a fiberoptic CO2 laser to treat palmar hyperhidrosis. Neurosurgery. 1992;30:131-135.

Katara AN, Domino JP, Cheah WK, et al. Comparing T2 and T2-T3 ablation in thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: a randomized control trial. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1768-1771.

Kwong KF, Cooper LB, Bennett LA, et al. Clinical experience in 397 consecutive thoracoscopic sympathectomies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:1063-1066.

Lai YT, Yang LH, Chio CC, et al. Complications in patients with palmar hyperhidrosis treated with transthoracic endoscopic sympathectomy. Neurosurgery. 1997;41:110-115.

Li X, Tu YR, Lin M, et al. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: a randomized control trial comparing T3 and T2-4 ablation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1747-1751.

Licht PB, Pilegaard HK. Severity of compensatory sweating after thoracoscopic sympathectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:427-431.

Mack MJ, Regan JJ, Bobechko WP, et al. Application of thoracoscopy for diseases of the spine. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:736-738.

McAfee PC, Regan JR, Zdeblick T, et al. The incidence of complications in endoscopic anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstructive surgery. A prospective multicenter study comprising the first 100 consecutive cases. Spine. 1995;20:1624-1632.

Pool JL. Myeloscopy: intrathecal endoscopy. Surgery. 1942;11:169-182.

Rosenthal D, Lorenz R. The use of the microsurgical endoscopic technique for treating affections of the dorsal spine: indications and early results. J Neurosurg. 1995;82:342A.

Yazbek G, Wolosker N, de CJr, et al. Palmar hyperhidrosis—which is the best level of denervation using video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy: T2 or T3 ganglion? J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:281-285.

References

1 Dickman CA, Rosenthal D, Karahalios DG, et al. Thoracic vertebrectomy and reconstruction using a microsurgical thoracoscopic approach. Neurosurgery. 1996;38:279-293.

2 McAfee PC, Regan JR, Zdeblick T, et al. The incidence of complications in endoscopic anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstructive surgery. A prospective multicenter study comprising the first 100 consecutive cases. Spine. 1995;20:1624-1632.

3 Regan JJ, Mack MJ, Picetti GDIII, et al. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with open thoracotomy in thoracic spinal surgery. Today’s Ther Trends. 1994;11:203-218.

4 Horowitz MB, Moossy JJ, Julian T, et al. Thoracic discectomy using video assisted thoracoscopy. Spine. 1994;19:1082-1086.

5 Rosenthal D, Rosenthal R, de Simone A. Removal of a protruded thoracic disc using microsurgical endoscopy. A new technique. Spine. 1994;19:1087-1091.

6 Regan JJ, Mack MJ, Picetti GDIII. A technical report on video-assisted thoracoscopy in thoracic spinal surgery. Spine. 1995;20:831-837.

7 Burman MS. Myeloscopy or the direct visualization of the spinal canal and its contents. J Bone Joint Surg. 1931;13:695-696.

8 Pool JL. Direct visualization of dorsal nerve roots of the cauda equina by means of the myeloscope. Arch Neurol Psychol. 1938;39:1308-1312.

9 Pool JL. Myeloscopy: diagnostic inspection of the cauda equina by means of the endoscope. Bull Neurol Inst NY. 1938;7:178-189.

10 Pool JL. Myeloscopy: intrathecal endoscopy. Surgery. 1942;11:169-182.

11 Onik G, Helms CA, Ginsburg L, et al. Percutaneous lumbar discectomy using a new aspiration probe. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;144:1137-1140.

12 Kambin P, Schaffer JL. Percutaneous lumbar discectomy. Review of 100 patients and current practice. Clin Orthop. 1989;238:24-34.

13 Ooi Y, Satoh Y, Morisaki N. Myeloscopy: the possibility of observing the lumbar intrathecal space by use of an endoscope. Endoscopy. 1973;5:901-906.

14 Mathews HH. Laser endoscopic spine surgery. First International Symposium on Lasers in Orthopedic Surgery. San Francisco, CA: September, 1991.

15 McKneally MF. Video-assisted thoracic surgery: standards and guidelines. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1993;3:345-351.

16 Kaiser LR. Video-assisted thoracic surgery. Current state of the art. Ann Surg. 1994;220:720-734.

17 Landreneau RJ, Mack MJ, Hazelrigg SR, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery: basic technical concepts and intercostal approach strategies. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:800-807.

18 Coltharp WH, Arnold JH, Alford WCJr, et al. Videothoracoscopy: improved technique and expanded indications. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;53:776-779.

19 Mack MJ, Aronoff RJ, Acuff TE, et al. Present role of thoracoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the chest. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:403-409.

20 Jacobaeus HC. Possibility of the use of the cystoscope for investigation of serious cavities. Munch Med Wochenschr. 1910;57:2090-2092.

21 Jacobaeus HC. The practical importance of thoracoscopy in surgery of the chest. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1922;34:289-296.

22 Jacobaeus HC. The cauterization of adhesions in pneumothorax treatment of tuberculosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1921;32:493-500.

23 Jacobaeus HC. Endopleural operations by means of a thoracoscope. Beitr Klin Tuberk. 1915;35:1.

24 Landreneau RJ, Hazelrigg SR, Mack MJ, et al. Postoperative pain-related morbidity: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:1285-1289.

25 Hazelrigg SR, Landreneau RJ, Boley TM, et al. The effect of muscle-sparing versus standard posterolateral thoracotomy on pulmonary function, muscle strength, and postoperative pain. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;101:394-401.

26 Ferson PF, Landreneau RJ, Dowling RD, et al. Comparison of open versus thoracoscopic lung biopsy for diffuse infiltrative pulmonary disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;106:194-199.

27 Rosenthal D, Lorenz R. The use of the microsurgical endoscopic technique for treating affections of the dorsal spine: indications and early results. J Neurosurg. 1995;82:342A.

28 Mack MJ, Regan JJ, Bobechko WP, et al. Application of thoracoscopy for diseases of the spine. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:736-738.

29 Yuan HA, Mann KA, Found EM. Early clinical experience with the Syracuse I-plate: an anterior spinal fixation device. Spine. 1988;2764:13056-13248.

30 Dickman CA, Mican CA. Multilevel anterior thoracic discectomies and anterior interbody fusion using a microsurgical thoracoscopic approach. J Neurosurg. 1996;84:104-109.

31 Dickman CA, Karahalios DG. Thoracoscopic spinal surgery. Clin Neurosurg. 1995;43:392-422.

32 Krasna MJ, Mack MJ. Sympathectomy. In: Krasna MJ, Mack MJ, editors. Atlas of Thoracoscopic Surgery. St. Louis: Quality; 1994:139-149.

33 Robertson DP, Simpson RK, Rose JE, et al. Video-assisted endoscopic thoracic ganglionectomy. J Neurosurg. 1993;79:238-240.

34 Kao MC, Tsai JC, Lai DM, et al. Autonomic activities in hyperhidrosis patients before, during, and after endoscopic laser sympathectomy. Neurosurgery. 1994;34:262-268.

35 Bohlman HH, Zdeblick TA. Anterior excision of herniated thoracic discs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:1038-1047.

36 Benjamin V. Diagnosis and management of thoracic disc disease. Clin Neurosurg. 1983;30:577-606.

37 Crafoord C, Hiertonn T, Lindblom K, et al. Spinal cord compression caused by a protruded thoracic disc. Report of a case treated with antero-lateral fenestration of the disc. Acta Orthop Scand. 1958;28:103-107.

38 Fidler MW, Goedhart ZD. Excision of prolapse of thoracic intervertebral disc. A transthoracic technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66:518-522.

39 Kaneda K, Abumi K, Fujiya M. Burst fractures with neurologic deficits of the thoraco-lumbar spine. Results of anterior decompression and stabilization with anterior instrumentation. Spine. 1984;9:788-795.

40 Kostuik JP. Anterior spinal cord decompression for lesions of the thoracic and lumbar spine, techniques, new methods of internal fixation results. Spine. 1983;8:512-531.

41 Kostuik JP. Anterior fixation for fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine with or without neurologic involvement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;189:103-115.

42 Perot PLJr, Munro DD. Transthoracic removal of midline thoracic disc protrusions causing spinal cord compression. J Neurosurg. 1969;31:452-458.

43 Ransahoff J, Spencer F, Siew F, et al. Transthoracic removal of thoracic disc. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg. 1969;31:459-461.

44 Otani K, Nakai S, Fujimura Y, et al. Surgical treatment of thoracic disc herniation using the anterior approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64:340-343.

45 McNeally MF, Lewis RJ, Anderson RJ, et al. Statement of the AATS/STS joint committee on thoracoscopy and video assisted thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:1.

46 Kux E. The endoscopic approach to the vegetative nervous system and its therapeutic possibilities. Dis Chest. 1951;20:139-147.

47 Cloward RB. Hyperhydrosis. J Neurosurg. 1969;30:545-551.

48 Kao MC Video endoscopic sympathectomy using a fiberoptic CO2 laser to treat palmar hyperhidrosis. Neurosurgery. 1992;30:131-135.

49 Kuntz A. Distribution of the sympathetic rami to the brachial plexus: its relation to sympathectomy affecting the upper extremity. Arch Surg. 1927;15:871-877.

50 Kux M. Thoracic endoscopic sympathectomy in palmar and axillary hyperhidrosis. Arch Surg. 1978;113:264-266.

51 Lai YT, Yang LH, Chio CC, et al. Complications in patients with palmar hyperhidrosis treated with transthoracic endoscopic sympathectomy. Neurosurgery. 1997;41:110-115.

52 Lin CC. A new method of thoracoscopic sympathectomy in hyperhidrosis palmaris. Surg Endosc. 1990;4:224-226.

53 Ray B. Sympathectomy of the upper extremity. Evaluation of surgical methods. J Neurosurg. 1953;10:624-633.

54 Shih CJ, Wang YC. Thoracic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: report of 457 cases. Surg Neurol. 1978;10:291-296.

55 Stolman LP. Treatment of excess sweating of palms by iontophoresis. Arch Dermatol. 1987;123:893-896.

56 Stanton-Hicks M, Jänig W, Hassenbiusch S, et al. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: changing concepts and taxonomy. Pain. 1995;63:127-133.

57 Johnson JP, Ahn SS. Thoracoscopic sympathectomy. Tech Neurosurg. 1997;3:308-314.

58 Segal R, Ferson PM, Nemoto E, et al. Blood flow-monitored transthoracic endoscopic sympathectomy. In: Rengachary SS, Wilkins RH, editors. Neurosurgical Operative Atlas. Park Ridge, IL: American Association of Neurological Surgeons; 1998:163-171.

59 Lee KH, Hwang PYK. Video endoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. J Neurosurg. 1996;84:484-486.

60 Schwartz PJ, Locati E, Priori SG, et al. The idiopathic long QT syndrome. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, editors. Cardiac Electrophysiology. From Cell to Bedside. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990:589-605.

61 Ouriel K, Moss AJ. Long QT syndrome: an indication for cervicothoracic sympathectomy. Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;3:475-478.

62 Johnson JP, Obasi C, Hahn MS, et al. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy. J Neurosurg. 1999;91:90-97.

63 Dickman CA, Mican C. Thoracoscopic approaches for the treatment of anterior thoracic spinal pathology. BNI Q. 1996;12:4-19.

64 Han PP, Kenny K, Dickman CA. Thoracoscopic approaches to the thoracic spine: experience with 241 surgical procedures. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:S88-S95.

65 Li X, Tu YR, Lin M, et al. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: a randomized control trial comparing T3 and T2-4 ablation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1747-1751.

66 Yazbek G, Wolosker N, de CJr, et al. Palmar hyperhidrosis—which is the best level of denervation using video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy: T2 or T3 ganglion? J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:281-285.

67 Barrenechea IJ, Fukumoto R, Lesser JB, et al. Endoscopic resection of thoracic paravertebral and dumbbell tumors. Neurosurgery. 2006;59:1195-1201.

68 Katara AN, Domino JP, Cheah WK, et al. Comparing T2 and T2-T3 ablation in thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: a randomized control trial. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1768-1771.

69 Kwong KF, Cooper LB, Bennett LA, et al. Clinical experience in 397 consecutive thoracoscopic sympathectomies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:1063-1066.

70 Choi BC, Lee YC, Sim SB. Treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis by endoscopic clipping of the upper part of the T4 sympathetic ganglion. Preliminary results. Clin Auton Res. 2003;13(Suppl 1):I48-I51.

71 Chou SH, Kao EL, Li HP, et al. T4 sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: an effective approach that simultaneously minimizes compensatory hyperhidrosis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2005;21:310-313.

72 Licht PB, Pilegaard HK. Severity of compensatory sweating after thoracoscopic sympathectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:427-431.

* References 16, 17, 28, 33, 34, 4750, 5255, 63.