Provision of anaesthesia in difficult situations and the developing world

Published on 27/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2297 times

Chapter 27 Provision of anaesthesia in difficult situations and the developing world

The provision of anaesthesia in modern well-equipped operating theatres is dependent on sophisticated electronic equipment that requires an uninterrupted supply of both electricity and compressed gasses. Such equipment is not readily transportable, although it may be moved within a hospital facility. There are many locations throughout the world where anaesthesia is administered to facilitate surgery, investigations or other forms of treatment outside this generally accepted ‘safe’ environment.

The following are examples of locations and situations away from hospital operating theatres where anaesthesia may be required, and where simpler or alternative means of providing anaesthesia may need to be employed:

Domiciliary anaesthesia – as in kitchen table appendicectomy and obstetric flying squad interventions – has long been abandoned on safety grounds and, more recently, so has anaesthesia in dental surgeries in the UK.

All of these situations are remote from the relatively safe, comfortable and familiar operating theatre anaesthetic environment, and the following problems may be encountered to a greater or lesser degree:

Where possible, on grounds of safety, patients should be transferred to medical facilities capable of providing the appropriate level of care. For example, electroconvulsive therapy for the psychiatric patient with severe aortic stenosis and depression would be better managed (from their cardiac status) in the operating suite of the main hospital rather than in a room off the psychiatric ward. Non-essential surgery should not be undertaken at the site of a major disaster or on the battlefield, and the use of local, regional or sedative techniques should be considered where appropriate.

The overriding principle in providing anaesthesia under any of these conditions should be to use a simple, safe technique familiar to the practitioner. To reduce complexity and avoid the potential administration of a hypoxic gas mixture as well as reducing the need for scavenging (and for many other well-documented reasons), there is a case for avoiding the use of nitrous oxide entirely. Training and practice in such techniques is invaluable for the time when they may be required. Even within a modern operating theatre environment, a ‘difficult situation’ may arise due to failure of a sophisticated electronic anaesthetic workstation, a major power cut with failure of back-up generators or a disruption to piped gas supply. The use of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) together with a self-inflating bag and a free-standing oxygen cylinder, combined with practical clinical monitoring, will allow adequate and safe anaesthesia in such a situation. Under such circumstances a hands-free torch or headlight may be the most essential item of additional equipment.

Difficult situations within hospitals

Sites away from the operating theatres often have anaesthetic equipment that is used only occasionally. Piped oxygen and suction facilities may be absent. The equipment in such areas must be maintained and checked adequately, with basic monitoring meeting the standard recommended by the Association of Anaesthetists.1 Since January 2003, all anaesthetic machines in use in the UK must be incapable of delivering a hypoxic mixture. There must be immediate access to resuscitation equipment and drugs, and a means of summoning additional assistance (i.e. telephone or intercom). The anaesthetist and their assistant should have sufficient experience and be familiar with both the environment and the equipment.

Some specific problems with regard to patients, medical attendants and equipment within particular areas are listed below.

Remote anaesthesia

Anaesthesia for MRI, radiotherapy and some radiological procedures may necessitate the anaesthetist and the bulk of the anaesthetic equipment being remote from the patient. This may be either to ensure all ferromagnetic equipment is outside the magnetic field, or to remove anaesthetic personnel from ionizing radiation:

• TIVA may be employed using long infusion lines on pumps which must be able to cope with the high resistance to flow caused by the increased length. This usually means setting to maximum the pressure limit for sensing an occlusion.

• Whilst sedation may be sufficient for some patients, the airway may need to be established with a supraglottic airway device or tracheal tube.

• Intermittent positive pressure ventilation through a long coaxial breathing system such as a 9.6–10 m Bain circuit and Nuffield Penlon series 200 ventilator, has been shown to provide safe anaesthesia.3 With this system, there is an increase in the static compliance in proportion to the length of the tubing. This is caused by expansion of the breathing hose and compression of the volume of gas during positive pressure ventilation and will result in a lower tidal volume being delivered than is set on the ventilator although this may be mitigated by the tidal volume supplementation from the fresh gas flow. Capnography is essential. In children, if a Newton valve is used, the ventilator becomes a pressure generator, and the increased resistance and compliance of the long system results in the pressure delivered being significantly less than that selected (23% less with a 10 kg child). This compares to a 6–11% reduction when using a long rubber Ayre’s T-piece.4

• The capnography signal is delayed due to the length of the sampling line but provides a guide for adjustment of the tidal volume.

Interhospital transfers

It is sometimes necessary to transfer anaesthetized patients to another hospital, particularly if they require specialist services which are not available on site. Often these patients will be critically ill and the keys to their successful transfer are communication, documentation and anticipation of possible problems. All hospitals should have a checklist for interhospital transfers:

Developing countries

There are two extremes of conditions that may be met in providing anaesthesia in developing countries. The anaesthetist may be totally dependent on the equipment, drugs and personnel provided within the healthcare system of that country, or they may be part of a visiting team that is totally self-contained. Visiting teams may be very operation specific (e.g. Project Orbis, Operation Smile and other eye or cleft palate teams), or they may have a much wider remit. Operation specific teams usually have rigid pre-assessment protocols, ensuring that standardized procedures are carried out on fit patients, enabling the greatest good to be done for the largest number of people. Some visiting teams may bring all facilities needed to perform a certain number of specified operations and anaesthetics. The devices in use can then range from those seen in modern developed economies through to equipment similar to that used for battlefield anaesthesia (see below). Others opt to mainly use local equipment, adding only their own disposable equipment.

‘District hospital’-based anaesthesia

Many small hospitals in developing countries rely on non-medically qualified assistants to deliver anaesthesia under the supervision of the doctor who will also be performing the surgery. Under these conditions, anaesthetized patients are more likely to be intubated to ensure a secure airway. Most anaesthetists in developing countries work in larger hospitals, but even here they may be responsible for the training and supervision of medical assistants giving anaesthesia. Many such hospitals, large and small, will have storerooms which have become graveyards of anaesthetic machines and other equipment donated by well-meaning organizations or countries, without consideration for the spare parts or expertise needed for their maintenance. There will often be continuous flow (Boyle’s) machines, discarded as the necessary compressed medical gas supply is absent or erratic. In addition, such machines may not have anti-hypoxia devices and vaporizers may be outdated, unserviceable or grossly inaccurate.

For all these reasons, local anaesthetic techniques (nerve blocks, spinals and epidurals) should be used where appropriate.

Draw-over anaesthesia

Pressurized gas delivered in cylinders is expensive and prone to interruption of the supply chain. The case for draw-over anaesthesia is even more compelling given intermittent electrical supplies. Implicit in this is the use of air (with supplemental oxygen when available) and draw-over type vaporizers.

Draw-over anaesthesia can be employed for both spontaneous and controlled ventilation, is not dependent on compressed gasses and requires only light portable equipment (vi The battlefield). The basic equipment required comprises:

Draw-over apparatus

Several draw-over vaporizers are available, including the Epstein-Macintosh-Oxford (EMO) (Fig. 27.1), Oxford miniature vaporizer (OMV, described in greater detail below) (Fig. 27.2), the now discontinued Ohmeda PAC which is still in widespread use (Fig. 27.3) and the recently introduced Diamedica vaporizer5 (Fig. 27.4). The EMO and OMV vaporizers are elucidated further in Chapter 3.

Practical equipment for safe anaesthesia can be provided by a combination of:

The facility for giving supplementary oxygen, using a T-piece and reservoir tubing as with the Triservice apparatus (see below), is desirable.

Various arrangements of draw-over apparatus are shown in Fig. 27.5, and the working principles of the commonly available draw-over vaporizers are shown in Figs. 27.14.

These vaporizers, like the Triservice Apparatus, are not CE marked as the problems of poor calibration, lack of temperature compensation and inherent risk of spillage of agent into the breathing circuit are insurmountable. This causes difficulty in attempts to gain experience with the equipment in the modern hospital environment, where patients are entitled to receive the highest standard of available care. The issue of standards is in fact a significant and wide-ranging one. It is argued that the standards organizations, in being dominated by manufacturers, produce standards geared to driving sales of the latest technology to wealthy nations.6 Such equipment does not address the needs of developing nations and the standards inhibit ‘low technology’ developments.

There are, however, courses available to demonstrate the use of such draw-over apparatus, using highly sophisticated anaesthetic simulators.

Supplemental oxygen

Medical oxygen may be available in cylinders, but these may not follow international standards of cylinder identification, and apparently full cylinders may be found to be empty. Industrial oxygen may be available, but be aware that there may be an increased level of impurities in such supplies. Up to 95% high-quality oxygen may be obtained from an oxygen concentrator (see Chapter 1). Oxygen concentrators are relatively maintenance-free, but require a source of electrical power to run a compressor and a switching device. A concentrator the size of a small domestic fridge will produce an inexhaustible supply of oxygen at the rate of up to 10 l min−1.

Ventilators suitable for developing countries

Manley Multivent ventilator

This ventilator was developed by the late Roger Manley, specifically for use in developing countries (Fig. 27.6).7 It differs from most other gas driven ventilators, in that the volume of gas required to drive the ventilator is only one-tenth of the patient’s minute volume. Furthermore, if the driving gas is oxygen it may be automatically collected and used to supplement the inspired oxygen concentration. Used in this way, set at a minute volume of 4 l min−1, an E size oxygen cylinder containing 680 L would drive the ventilator and supply 35% oxygen in air for a period of 28 h. The ventilator consists of a weighted beam, attached at one end to a fulcrum and at the other end to the top of the bellows. The beam is pushed upwards by the driving gas under a pressure of at least 140 KPa acting on a piston. When the set tidal volume is reached, the flow of driving gas is interrupted and the weight of the beam compresses the bellows, delivering the mixture of anaesthetic gasses to the patient. The economy of driving gas is achieved by the relative distances of the piston and the bellows to the fulcrum. Should the supply of pressurized gas fail completely, the bellows can be operated manually.

image

Figure 27.6 Manley Multivent.

Photo courtesy of Penlon Ltd, UK.

Combination anaesthetic equipment

A number of ingenious machines incorporating an oxygen concentrator, oxygen cylinders, a ventilator, and vaporizers, which can be used in either draw-over or continuous flow mode, assembled on a mobile trolley, have been produced such as the prototype ‘Fentolator’ developed by Paul Fenton in Malawi.8 The advantages of such equipment in principle is that it is permanently assembled and available, aiming to be seen as the complete versatile anaesthetic machine. If monitoring equipment is available, this can be incorporated as well. Two fully developed examples of such combination equipment are the ‘Glostavent’ (Fig. 27.7) developed by Roger Eltringham in Gloucester, UK.9 based originally on the Manley Multivent Ventilator described above, and the Universal Anaesthesia Machine.

Finally, the other essential piece of equipment is suction apparatus. In areas where electricity supply may be unreliable, it is advisable to have manual or foot-operated suction apparatus.

Universal Anaesthesia Machine (UAM)

At the time of writing, the very newly produced UAM (Fig. 27.8) is starting to undergo field evaluations, and represents the only CE marked anaesthesia machine designed with the needs of developing countries in mind. Developed by Paul Fenton and manufactured by OES Medical (Abingdon, UK), production has been made possible as a result of funding by the Nick Simons Foundation: a charitable organization dedicated to providing medical care in rural Nepal.

image

Figure 27.8 Universal Anaesthesia Machine.

Photo courtesy of OES Medical, Abingdon, UK.

The UAM keeps the failsafe features of draw-over anaesthesia, but by removing the need for a non-rebreathing valve at the patient end of the breathing attachment allows use of modern lightweight coaxial or Y configured dual-limb breathing tubes, which also facilitate waste anaesthetic gas scavenging. The key feature in this is the balloon valve, incorporated into the machine, which occludes the expiratory limb of the breathing system through an actuator pipe that is pressurized from the breathing system to allow positive pressure ventilation (Fig. 27.9). A one way flap valve distal to the balloon occluder ensures unidirectional flow through the breathing system during spontaneous respiration.

The machine houses a built-in oxygen concentrator capable of producing up to 10 L min−1, but also has cylinder yokes for oxygen and nitrous oxide as well as connections for pipeline oxygen. An additional low pressure O2 inlet is provided distal to the flowmeters. A fuel cell oxygen analyzer downstream of the calibrated vaporizer linked to an electronically operated valve shuts off the nitrous oxide supply where a minimum of 35% O2 is not detected. Positive and negative pressure relief valves upstream of the vaporizer and reservoir bag allow entrainment of room air and hence anaesthesia delivery in the absence of power or gas supplies. A pressure transducer at this level can act as an ‘apnoea alarm’ by warning of distension of the reservoir bag, which indicates diminished patient minute volume in comparison to the fresh gas flow rate. The inflating bellows can be used to assist or take over ventilation as in other draw-over systems.

Future iterations of the UAM are planned to include an in-line electrically powered bellows ventilator within the oxygen concentrator housing and an integral circle system and absorber. The aforementioned, with high-quality production values and materials, multiple source oxygen facilities allowing continuous flow gas delivery, low maintenance requirements, the use of modern breathing systems in a draw-over configuration and CE marking; all in a restricted cost device, aim to permit use in any hospital setting.

Major accidents and disasters

These may occur in any part of the world at any time, and are by definition unexpected. All medical services should have a plan to deal with major disasters. A typical approach is to have a mobile medical team that can be rapidly deployed to the disaster site and a receiving hospital capable of dealing with the retrieved casualties. In the event of the number of casualties overwhelming the initial response, there should be a means of either escalating the number of teams or hospitals deployed. In developing countries, there may be a need to seek international assistance. Many countries have teams available for worldwide deployment at short notice. Particular problems encountered include:

The battlefield

Mobile field hospitals are deployed as close to the battlefront as safety will allow, and receive casualties who will normally have had only life-saving first-aid treatment at a regimental aid post or equivalent. In addition to military casualties from both sides of the conflict, there are frequently civilian casualties, which may include children. This poses a problem if paediatric equipment is not available. Large numbers of casualties may arrive simultaneously, and require triage on arrival. In some, immediate surgery is required as part of the resuscitation process. Some of the features of military anaesthesia are as follows:

Electricity is required for lighting, monitoring, suction, heating and refrigeration (for blood storage and some drugs), and will usually be supplied from generators that must be of sufficient power to cope with maximum demand. Vital equipment should have an independent battery back-up. Many modern pieces of equipment have a back-up supply of only 10 min. Sensitive equipment should have surge protection to limit voltage spikes from erratic power supplies.

Triservice apparatus

The equipment in use at the moment by the British military medical services is the Triservice Anaesthetic Apparatus (Fig. 27.10).10,11 This consists of two modified OMVs connected via a self-inflating bag to a non-rebreathing valve and facemask or airway device. Supplemental oxygen may be delivered upstream of the vaporizers by a T-piece with a length of corrugated tubing acting as a reservoir. This complete apparatus, including an oxygen regulator and cylinder yoke, comes securely packed in foam within an air portable container, all weighing less than 25 kg, and can be safely dropped by parachute.

The OMV used in this apparatus has been modified by incorporating three folding feet to enable them to stand on a flat surface. Additionally, the capacity of the chamber has been increased to 50 ml. The wicks within the vaporizing chamber are of metal gauze, so that a different agent may be used by simply draining the vaporizer and rinsing the chamber (with a little of the new agent, which is then discarded), before properly charging the vaporizer for use.

Detachable calibration scales are supplied for different agents. When the control is turned to ‘0’ (off), the contents will not spill if the vaporizer is accidentally inverted, although it is recommended that the vaporizer should be drained for transport. If it is tipped or inverted during use, the vaporizer must be kept upright for a few minutes before use to allow agent that may have entered the bypass or the control mechanism to drain back into the chamber, otherwise very high concentrations of vapour may be initially delivered. The OMV is not temperature-compensated, and although its body acts as a small heatsink, the vapour output concentration will decrease with time. By having two OMVs in series, it is possible to switch between them as the output from one starts to fall off, to switch between different agents, or to use both in series to deliver a higher concentration for induction of anaesthesia. Previously, trichloroethylene was administered alongside halothane to make up for the absence of the analgesic effect of nitrous oxide.

Pneupac compPac ventilator

The Triservice apparatus may be used in spontaneously breathing patients, or IPPV may be instituted either using the self-inflating bag or by replacing the bag with a suitable ventilator. Originally the CapeTC50, a relatively portable ventilator consisting of a bellows expanded and contracted by an electric motor, was used. This has been replaced in British military use by the Pneupac compPAC ventilator (Fig. 27.11). This is a rugged, portable, gas-powered ventilator which can be driven from an external gas source (3–6 bar) or from its internal compressor. An integral rechargeable battery or external 24/28V DC supply drives the compressor and there is the facility for admixture of oxygen from a low pressure source.

image

Figure 27.11 Pneupac compPAC Ventilator, Smiths Medical, UK.

Photo courtesy of Smiths Medical International.

The Triservice apparatus is used in ‘push-over’ mode when using the compPAC ventilator. In this configuration – vaporizer between ventilator and patient – the pumping effect causes a slight-to-moderate increase in delivered vapour concentration. Capnography, end expired agent concentration monitoring and pulse oximetry should all be available at the mobile field hospital, and will enable safe anaesthesia to be provided with such equipment.

Joint operations with other national forces, which are the nature of current deployments of the British military, encourage the use of a more common platform of equipment where major medical facilities may be manned by non-UK personnel and where portability is not such a priority. More ‘conventional’ equipment may, therefore, be seen at a ‘role 3’ hospital (role 1 being closest to site of wounding, and role 4 being specialist services in the UK) such as in Camp Bastion in Helmand Province, Afghanistan (Fig. 27.12).

Abnormal ambient pressures

Altitude

It may be necessary to use anaesthetic equipment at low ambient pressures, as in the transfer of patients by aircraft and in high-altitude locations. The highest human habitation is at about 5000 m or 16 000 ft, giving an atmospheric pressure of about 400 mmHg. Commercial aircraft, however, usually have cabin pressure maintained at 640 mmHg minimum, which is equivalent to 1500 m, despite flying at heights of over 9000 m. In order to provide safe anaesthesia, a knowledge of the altered performance of anaesthetic equipment at different ambient pressures is essential:

• Flowmeters. The reduction in gas density at altitude results in under-reading of variable orifice, constant differential pressure flowmeters. The error is about 20% at 3000 m. Under hyperbaric conditions, these flowmeters will over-read.13

• Pressure gauges. These are calibrated at sea-level and so over-read at altitude. The error is negligible, as the pressures measured are so much greater.

• Vaporizers. Saturated vapour pressure is a function of temperature, not ambient pressure. Hence, the concentration delivered by a vaporizer is inversely proportional to the ambient pressure as the vapour pressure takes up a higher proportion of the ambient pressure at altitude, and a lesser proportion under hyperbaric conditions. However, the partial pressure of the agent, which determines the clinical effect, remains constant. Therefore, when vaporizers are used at a given setting, the anaesthetic will be delivered at a constant potency or effect, regardless of concentration changes with altitude (or depth). A vaporizer set at 1% at sea level will deliver 1.7% at 4500 m, but the clinical effect will be unaltered.

• Gas analyzers and capnography. Gas analyzers measure the partial pressure of the gas under test but are calibrated in percentage at sea-level. They will, therefore, under-read at high altitude. Reduction of atmospheric pressure may also affect capnography in the following ways:14

• Venturi-type oxygen masks. These will entrain less air at altitude and so deliver higher concentrations of oxygen. A 35% mask will deliver approximately 41% oxygen at 3000 m.

• Ventilators. Volume or time-cycled ventilators may be preferable to pressure-cycled ventilators, but capnography and other monitoring will assist in adjusting ventilator settings under these conditions.

Hyperbaric chamber and anaesthetic equipment

A brief synopsis of some issues specific to high ambient pressure environment is given below (see also Chapter 7, Oxygen delivery at high or low atmospheric pressures):

Most anaesthetic equipment is at best untested under these conditions, and at worst dangerous. The following issues should be considered:

References

1 Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery, 4th ed. 21 Portland Place, London W1B 1PY, AAGBI, 2007, http://www.aagbi.org/publications/guidelines.htm.

2 Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Provision of anaesthetic services in magnetic resonance units, 21 Portland Place, London W1B 1PY, AAGBI, 2002, http://www.aagbi.org/publications/guidelines.htm.

3 Sweeting CJ, Thomas PW, Sanders DJ. The long Bain breathing system: an investigation into the implications of remote ventilation. Anaesthesia. 2002;57:1183–1186.

4 Jackson E, Tan S, Yarwood G, Sury MRJ. Increasing the length of the expiratory limb of the Ayre’s T-piece: implications for remote mechanical ventilation in infants and children. Br J Anaesth. 1994;73:154–156.

5 English WA, Tully R, Muller GD, Eltringham RJJ. The Diamedica Draw-Over Vaporizer: a comparison of a new vaporizer with the Oxford Miniature Vaporizer. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:84–92.

6 Dobson M, Neighbour R. The International Standards Organisation is an obstacle to the development of appropriate anaesthetic equipment for the developing world. IET Seminar Digests. 2008;12213:3.

7 Manley R. A new ventilator for developing countries and difficult situations. World Anaesthesia Newsletter. 1991;5:10–11.

8 Eltringham RJ, Fan Qui W. The Glostavent – an anaesthetic machine for difficult situations. ITACCS. 2001;Spring/Summer:38–40.

9 Fenton PM. Inhalation anaesthesia in developing countries: the problems and a proposed solution – 3. Anaesthesia News, 2003;191:8–9. www.aagbi.org/anaesthesia_news_2003.html.

10 Houghton IT. The Triservice anaesthetic apparatus. Anaesthesia. 1981;36:1094–1108.

11 Adley R, Evans DHC, Mahoney PF, Riley B, Rodgers CR, Shanks T. The Gulf War: anaesthetic experience at 32 Field Hospital Department of Anaesthesia and Resuscitation. Anaesthesia. 1992;47:996–999.

12 Restall J, Tully AM, Ward PJ, Kidd AG. Total intravenous anaesthesia for military surgery. A technique using ketamine, midazolam and vecuronium. Anaesthesia. 1988;43:46–49.

13 McDowall DG. Anaesthesia in a pressure chamber. Anaesthesia. 1964;19:321–336.

14 Pattinson K, Myers S, Gardner-Thorpe C. Problems with capnography at altitude. Anaesthesia. 2004;59:69–72.

Share this: