The anaesthetic workstation

Published on 27/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 27/02/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 3 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 6945 times

Chapter 4 The anaesthetic workstation

The anaesthetic workstation (Fig. 4.1) has evolved over the years from the simple inhaler for the admixture of volatile anaesthetics, through anaesthetic machines with calibrated delivery of inspired agents to the current modern workstation complete with integral ventilator, breathing system and patient and machine monitoring. Automated record keeping systems allow integration of the machine into institutional information networks and, more recently, online access to expert systems for decision support (see Chapter 22, Information Technology and the Anaesthetic Workstation). Such systems remain rare and in spite of the diminishing costs and expanding capabilities of electronic-microprocessor-based control systems, simple pneumatic anaesthetic machines with needle-valve flowmeters and conventional vaporizers still dominate in UK hospitals. There has been no ‘revolution’ in anaesthetic machines as yet.

Products offered to a market place by successful companies reflect a balance of technology, economics and what the end user is or will be willing to engage with. In this respect the particular machines described in the latter section of this chapter when viewed as a whole, demonstrate how anaesthetists have only gradually come to be prepared to use ‘fly by wire’ technology: electronically controlled machines operated through a computer interface. Even within anaesthesia such technology is not new; along the way machines with iterations of such technology such as the Engstrom Elsa1 have perished in the market where the devices really were ‘before their time’.

When the anaesthetic machine appears a physically, if not intellectually, impenetrable box with opaque control systems operated through a simple video screen, it is tempting to think that the study of joints in metal tubing, pressure regulators, mechanical hypoxia prevention systems and flow valves is somewhat anachronistic. It may be, but caution is advised: the user manual for a state of the art workstation such as the Dräger Zeus runs to 346 pages (it is difficult to envisage more than a singular instruction sheet for the original Boyle’s trolley) and reflects the complexity of the processes underlying these devices. The logic and control of such systems is an elaboration of what has gone before and an understanding of the processes is necessary if we are to be able to cope with the machines and to demand better performance or deal with fault conditions. Additionally it seems we are occasionally required to relearn lessons of the past.2

Throughout the changes above, developments have been driven by the need for safety addressed by the inclusion of fail-safe systems, and by ‘the designing out’ of the possibilities of dangerous user errors. This aspect of the workstation may be regarded as having developed through successive generations of improvements and modifications having been incorporated, such that the ‘anaesthetic machine’ component of a modern workstation is still usually recognizable as a descendant of the first-generation Boyle’s trolley. Over time, technological safety features have become enshrined in national and international standards which are largely adhered to. As such, an analysis of critical incidents may help to inform a logical approach to the understanding of the safety features and design of modern machines, and for this reason such a section is included in this chapter.

One notable change over the last few years has been the narrowing gap between anaesthesia ventilators and intensive care ventilators. Software-driven, electronically controlled devices are seen that, if not identical in technology to the ITU types, are at least capable of emulating most ventilatory modes if desired. Simple purely mechanical ventilators are seen now only in devices purpose built for the developing countries (see Chapter 27). The reader is referred to Chapters 9 and 10 for more detailed information on ventilators.

Functions of the modern workstation

Inhalational anaesthesia is still the most commonly used technique worldwide. A few years ago, the AneoTivas, a much simpler anaesthetic machine designed for the delivery of two intravenous anaesthetic agents only (with integral respiratory support and patient monitoring) failed to get past the prototype stage. The anaesthetic workstation, itself an elaboration of the continuous flow anaesthetic machine, has thus developed to accurately and continuously deliver a safe mixture of gasses and vapours for the administration of anaesthesia. The component parts of the modern workstation represent its various and extended functions:

Development of the anaesthetic workstation

The overriding principle governing design of the anaesthetic workstation has been to increase safety in anaesthesia. The invisible and odorless nature of the main gasses used has meant that the focus of safety in the machine has had to be prevention of the accidental delivery of incorrect gasses and gas mixtures. This commences with gas-specific connections to wall and cylinder supplies and continues through non-interchangeable gas-specific pipework within the machine and from there on to standardized arrangements of flow control valves. Along the way, fail-safe devices prevent delivery of nitrous oxide (N2O) in the event of failure of the oxygen (O2) supply which is given the highest alarm priority. Carbon dioxide (CO2), another ill wind, has been largely eradicated from anaesthetic machines, further reducing potential error sources.

Integrated and modular designs

The first machines were solely for gas and volatile agent delivery. Monitoring was a purely clinical modality and a function of the anaesthetist. As individual monitors became available they were connected to or placed onto the machine with a view to creating effectively what would now be termed an anaesthesia workstation. The next generation of modern devices briefly attempted to integrate these parts into one harmonious unit (such as the Narkomed 2 and 3 series from North American Dräger discussed in the 4th edition of this text, and below).

Since then though, the design of the anaesthesia workstation has moved away from an integrated single entity towards a modular approach of combining various component parts, perhaps even from different manufacturers, to produce devices adapted for many applications and with less in-built obsolescence. This has been necessitated by the unforeseen growth in the range of possible monitoring modalities which no manufacturer could hope to encompass in one device, and the expansion of the functions of the anaesthesia workstation.

Twenty years ago, when the majority of machines consisted of a stainless steel trolley with a number of monitors stacked on top, at least one manufacturer was making an integrated anaesthesia workstation where gas delivery and patient monitoring were one singular entity. The Narkomed 2a had two CRT screens showing all settings and monitored variables. However, by today’s standards, the in-built monitoring was rudimentary. Indeed, it is difficult to imagine how we could once again have a scenario where one in-built monitor can satisfy all requirements unless it has the facility for individual monitoring modalities to be interchanged.

The answer has been to return to a modular approach. The basic pneumatic anaesthetic machine is contained within a chassis or framework to which is added:

Patient and machine monitoring

Monitoring of patient physiological variables is often approached separately to the monitoring of machine settings and function. Currently, the favoured arrangement is to have at least two monitors. One monitor is integral to the anaesthetic machine as part of the ventilator control area and displays the related parameters such as airway pressure and volume changes which are needed for the microprocessor control of the ventilator. This screen invariably also displays the back bar and/or breathing system oxygen concentration. Beyond measurement of inspired oxygen (FiO2) and simple flow and volume measurements from the breathing system, patient respiratory gas monitoring is usually a function of a second and separate patient physiological monitor. The patient monitor is most conveniently attached on a swing-out arm, allowing the patient, machine and display to be aligned in a comfortable arc for ease of viewing and access.

Separate patient monitoring also has the advantage of allowing standardization of monitors between the operating theatres and ward areas in hospitals. This, together with modular monitoring systems, means that machines can be designated to a variety of surgical scenarios which may have differing needs in terms of patient physiological monitoring.

Monitors can still be integrated such that information from each of the monitoring systems may be prioritized by a computer before any alarm is sounded, although where patient and machine monitoring are largely separate, so far this has tended not to happen. The data may be displayed in the most convenient fashion for easy and quick assimilation and may then be collated to provide a permanent record. Monitoring, where combined with automatic record keeping, can thus also log and reveal both the equipment and the anaesthetist’s performance for the purposes of medical audit.

Electronics: monitoring or control?

The modern anaesthetic workstation has been invaded by electronics. Despite many predictions over the years, the role of electronics has remained until recently largely one of monitoring rather than control. The Engström ELSA and the PhysioFlex – machines that exemplified the ‘fly by wire’ approach of computer control of the anaesthesia machine – were presented in the fourth edition (1998) of this text, but were no longer in production by the time of the fifth edition (2005). It is only very recently that such machines have re-emerged to be seen in use. Curiously, the PhysioFlex is once again gracing the pages of this book, but this time incarnated as the Zeus, the original manufacturer having been incorporated into Dräger Medical of Germany and the concept further developed by them. Apart from microprocessor control of the sophisticated ICU type anaesthetic ventilators, there has not been a massive expansion in the control role of electronics. Whether this reflects a desire on the part of anaesthetists for an intrinsic empathy with the principal tool of their trade or an unwillingness to tackle new concepts remains unanswered.

The flow of gasses through the workstation has largely remained under pneumatic and direct mechanical control. There are currently only very few machines offering electronic servo control of gas flow and/or vapour concentrations. Although needle valves (see below) remain ubiquitous for control of gas flows, many machines do use electronic monitoring (and display) of the flow rates instead of rotameters (see Chapter 2).

The electronically controlled machines discussed later in this chapter represent only a small proportion of the machines currently in use.

The anaesthetic delivery system

Given that the most popular designs of anaesthesia workstation are essentially modular (in terms of separating patient monitoring from gas delivery), this part of the chapter will concentrate on the gas delivery aspect of the workstation.

The basic design of delivery systems is common to a wide variety of manufacturers and may be considered under a number of headings. A working knowledge of these parts of the machine should allow rapid assimilation of the salient features of any new device.

A typical machine consists of:

The compressed gas attachments

Compressed gasses to be used by the anaesthetic machine (air, oxygen and nitrous oxide) are usually supplied by two methods: cylinders and pipelines.

Cylinders

The cylinders are clamped onto the machine by a yoke arrangement and secured tightly using a wing-nut (Fig. 4.2). To prevent installation of the wrong gas cylinder to a yoke, the cylinder heads are coded with appropriately positioned holes that match pins on the machine yoke. This is called a pin index system, for which there is an internationally agreed standard (ISO 407:2004) (see Fig. 1.5). A thin neoprene and aluminium washer (Bodok seal) is interposed between the cylinder head and yoke to provide a gas-tight seal when the two are clamped together.

Cylinder yokes are also fitted with filters and one-way spring-loaded non-return (check) valves. The one-way valve prevents retrograde leaks when a cylinder is removed.

A leak of not more than 15 ml min–1 through an open yoke is acceptable in new machines. However, in older machines the non-return valve may not be as efficient owing either to the design (the valve not being spring loaded) or to wear and tear, and could result in greater than acceptable backpressure leaks. These leaks, when occurring unexpectedly, have been shown to alter the composition of the gas leaving the flowmeter block and have resulted in the delivery of a hypoxic gas mixture to an attached breathing system (see section on Flowmeters). Blanking plugs (dummy cylinder heads) are available and should be inserted into all empty yokes to overcome this problem (Fig. 4.3).

Pressure (contents) gauges

The pressure in cylinders and pipelines is measured by Bourdon-type gauges (see Fig. 2.6). The gas entry to the pressure gauge has a constriction so as to smooth out surges in pressure that could damage the gauge, as well as to prevent total and rapid loss of gas should a gauge rupture. The gauges are labelled and colour coded for each gas, according to the standards for each country. They are also calibrated for each gas used on the machine. The scale on the gauge extends to a pressure at least 33% greater than either the filling pressure of the cylinder or pipeline pressure (at a temperature of 20°C). Each cylinder yoke may be fitted with a gauge or, alternatively, a single-cast brass block may be used to house the NIST/DISS pipeline connection, cylinder yoke, pressure regulator and housings for the pressure gauges (Fig 4.4). This minimizes the number of connections and potential leaks, but is a somewhat dated arrangement now.

Pressure regulators (reducing valves)

Pressure regulators are used on anaesthetic machines for three main reasons:

Not only is the pressure reduced, but it is also kept constant, and for this reason this type of valve is more correctly termed a pressure regulator.

Working principles

In Fig. 4.6, the chamber C is enclosed on one side by the diaphragm D. As gas enters the chamber through the valve V, the pressure in the chamber is increased and the diaphragm is distended against its own elastic recoil and the force from the spring S. Eventually the pressure rises high enough to move the diaphragm far enough to close valve V. The pressure at which this occurs may be varied by adjusting the screw X so as to alter the force exerted by the spring S. If gas is allowed to escape from the outlet of the chamber, the pressure falls and valve V reopens. When the regulator is in use, a steady pressure is maintained in the chamber by the partial opening of valve V.

In another form of regulator (Adams valve), the push-rod is replaced by a ‘lazy tongs’ toggle arrangement (Fig. 4.7), which reverses the direction of the thrust transmitted from the diaphragm.

The accuracy of regulators

Let us consider that the push-rod is pushed downward by two forces: the compression in the spring and the elastic recoil of the diaphragm (Fig. 4.8). Let these be added together and represented by S. The force that opposes S consists of two parts: the high pressure (P) of the gas pushing on the valve V over an area of a; and the low pressure (p) acting on the diaphragm over an area A, so:

image

Thus, if S remains constant, as P falls, p rises so that as the cylinder empties, the regulated pressure increases. In fact, as P falls, the valve V will have to open further to permit the same flow rate. The spring expands and therefore its compression is reduced, and in the same way the tension in the diaphragm is reduced. Therefore, as P falls, there is a small reduction in S, which partially reverses the effect illustrated here.

In the Adams valve (Fig. 4.9), it can be seen that the pressure P exerted by the high-pressure gas to open valve V is assisted by the spring and the recoil of the diaphragm S. These forces jointly oppose the force exerted by the low-pressure gas on the diaphragm, so:

image

Now as P falls, so does p; therefore the regulated pressure falls slightly as the cylinder pressure drops. At the same time the valve V opens slightly and this, by allowing the spring to expand, reduces S, which slightly accentuates the fall in p. The fall of p can be minimized by making S great compared with Pa.

There are several types of pressure regulator available, the choice being dependent on:

For low-pressure regulators, the diaphragms are frequently made of rubber or neoprene, whereas in those for higher pressures the diaphragm is made of metal. Adjustments to alter the regulated pressure should be made only by service engineers. On some anaesthetic machines, ‘universal’ regulators are used. These operate equally well from an input of 420 kPa (60 psi) from the pipeline, as from a maximum of 20 000 kPa (2900 psi) from cylinders and are of the Adams type. The term ‘universal’ is also used in a different context, as below.

Relief valves on regulators

Safety blow-off valves are often fitted on the downstream side of regulators to allow the escape of gas if, by accident, the regulators fail and allow a high-output pressure. With a regulator designed to give a pressure of 420 kPa (60 psi), the relief valve may be set at 525 kPa (70 psi). These valves may be spring loaded (Fig. 4.10), in which case they close when the pressure falls again, or they may operate by rupture, in which case they remain open until repaired. As a further safety feature, a flow restrictor (usually in the form of a simple pin hole orifice) on the high pressure inlet side of the regulator, limits maximal flow from the cylinder to between 70 and 150 l min–1, ensuring that in the event of regulator failure the high-pressure relief valve can dump the maximal flow without further pressure rises.

Secondary pressure regulators

Several factors cause the machine working pressure (420 kPa in the UK) to fluctuate by up to 20%. For example, at times of peak demand in a hospital, pipeline pressures may well drop by this amount. Similarly, if an auxiliary outlet on the anaesthetic machine is used to drive a ventilator with a very high sudden and intermittent gas demand, a similar pressure drop will occur before the pipeline or cylinder is able to restore the supply. These pressure fluctuations produce parallel fluctuations in flowmeter performance. A second (secondary) regulator set below the anticipated pressure drop smoothes out the supply, minimizing these fluctuations. This is important in machines incorporating mechanically linked anti-hypoxia systems attached to the flowmeter bank (see below), as these systems assume that the oxygen supply pressure is constant in order to achieve an accurate flow of gas. A mechanically linked system would not be able to detect altered gas flow rates caused by changing pressures. Furthermore, secondary regulators also prolong the accurate supply of oxygen to the flowmeter if there is a gradual failure of the oxygen supply (i.e. cylinder emptying) prior to the oxygen failure warning device being activated.

Regulators have to meet stringent criteria before being installed. They are required to withstand pressure of 30 mPa (megaPascals) without disruption and their output should not vary more than 10% across a wide flow range (100 ml min–1 to 12 l min–1). They should also be fitted with a pressure relief valve that opens at a pressure not exceeding 800 kPa (UK).

Gas-tight connections within the machine

The various components within the anaesthetic machine are joined to each other by a series of pipes. Although now almost entirely made of high-density nylon, previously copper piping was standard, and is still used occasionally; hence these components are also briefly described below. Piped medical gas conduits within hospital walls and ducting are still entirely of metal.

Whilst there is no standard for the design of gas piping within the machine, with the advent of nylon tubing, manufacturers tend to use pipes of differing diameters and/or sometimes colour for the different gasses to reduce the risk of accidental misconnection during servicing and assembly (see Fig 4.5A where the white tubing is for oxygen and the blue and black, respectively, for nitrous oxide and air).

Joints in metal tubing

These may be permanent or detachable. Two metal pipes may be permanently joined by one of two methods:

The adjacent surfaces are then bonded together by brazing (applying a molten filler alloy whose melting temperature is above 430°C) or hard soldering (a similar principle using an alloy with a lower melting point). After making such a joint it is important that all traces of flux are removed. Flux is a material applied to the surfaces to be bonded, allowing the molten filler to spread more evenly. More recently, a system of brazing copper pipes and brass fittings without flux has been evolved. This is used particularly for medical gas pipeline installations.

Where provision has to be made for disconnection and reconnection of a joint, a union is used. This consists of two parts held together in a gas-tight manner, usually by a nut or cap, which screws onto a parallel male thread. Figure 4.11C shows a ball and cone (or cone seated) union, in which the seating is by direct metal-to-metal contact. A flange (or flat seated) union (Fig. 4.11D) requires a washer to complete the seal. With pipes carrying oxygen, this washer should be of non-flammable material.

For some other purposes tapered threads (Fig. 4.11E) may be used and the seal made either by screwing them down extremely tightly or by interposing a sealing compound such as PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene/Teflon) in the form of a tape. The joint between the valve block and the body of a medical gas cylinder, for example, is sealed by a metal foil between two tapered threads and is designed to melt at high temperatures, allowing gradual release of cylinder contents.

Valve glands

Where a valve spindle passes from an area of high pressure to one of low pressure, provision must be made to prevent the leak of gasses along the line of the spindle. This is achieved by means of a gland. In Figure 4.13, the nut ‘N’ must be screwed down sufficiently tightly to ensure that the packing is applied so closely to the spindle that no gas can escape by this route. There is provision for the nut to be tightened down further to prevent leaks as the packing wears.

The principle can be used for a high-pressure gland, such as that of an oxygen cylinder (see Chapter 1), or in a low-pressure gland such as that in a flowmeter (Fig. 4.14). In the case of high-pressure valves, a special type of leather or long-fibre asbestos was at one time used for the packing, but modern glands are filled with specially shaped nylon. Those in low-pressure flow control valves may be filled with rubber, nylon, neoprene or cotton.

Buy Membership for Anesthesiology Category to continue reading. Learn more here