Electrical safety and injuries

Published on 27/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1155 times

Chapter 75 Electrical safety and injuries

Patients suffering from the consequences of electrocution and associated burns occasionally require intensive care unit (ICU) management. Patients and staff in the ICU are at risk of electrocution from faulty electrical equipment. The necessity of direct patient contact with electrical equipment increases this risk, and when therapy involves an invasive contact close to the heart, microshock is an additional hazard. Faulty electrical equipment can also result in power failures, fires and explosions. The use of mobile phones and related devices nearby patient equipment can lead to malfunctioning.

PHYSICAL CONCEPTS

Electricity is produced by the movement of negatively charged electrons. A potential difference or voltage, measured in volts (V), exists between two points if the number or density of electrons is greater at one point. When these points are connected by a conductor, the potential difference will cause electrons or an electric current (I), measured in amperes (A), to flow. Resistance (R), measured in ohms (O), opposes this flow of electrons. Resistance is low in a conductor, because electrons can move freely from atom to atom. However, resistance is high in an insulator as electrons are unable to move freely. Voltage, current and resistance are related by Ohm’s law:

image

When an electric current flows through a resistance, it dissipates energy as heat. The heating effect per second, or power, is measured in Joules (J)/s or Watts (W):

image

When a current flows in one direction, such as produced by a battery, it is called a direct current. Electricity to homes, hospitals and factories is supplied as an alternating current which flows back and forth at a frequency, i.e. cycles per second or hertz (Hz). Voltage and frequency specifications vary worldwide. This may cause problems when electrical equipment, designed to be used in one region, is used elsewhere. Voltage specifications range from 100 V (i.e. Japan) to 240 V (i.e. Australia), with 220 V being most commonly supplied (i.e. UK, most of Europe and Asia). The frequency most commonly supplied is 50 Hz. North America is a notable exception, where the specification is 110–120 V and 60 Hz.

A current flowing in a circuit produces electric and magnetic fields, which induce currents to flow in neighbouring circuits. When this results in a current flowing between the two circuits, it is called coupling. With capacitive coupling, high frequency currents are most easily passed, and the size of the current is greatest when the circuits are close. Inductive coupling can result from the strong magnetic fields produced by heavy duty electrical equipment, such as transformers, electric motors and magnetic resonance imaging machines. The most common problem associated with coupling is electrical interference or ‘noise’. Monitoring equipment is designed to ‘filter’ out this noise. However, in certain circumstances, such as the use of high frequency surgical diathermy and magnetic resonance, sufficient amperage can be induced to cause microshock and burns.1,2 Smaller electromagnetic fields emitted by hand-held devices, such as mobile phones, can affect the programming of microprocessors. Cases of patient equipment malfunctions have been reported.3

Static electricity has no free flow of electrons. Insulated objects can become highly charged, usually by repeated rubbing. The charge is dissipated by electrons jumping onto another neighbouring object of a different potential. ‘Jumping’ electrons ionise and heat the air through which they pass, causing a spark which may ignite an inflammable liquid or gas. Lightning is a type of static electrical discharge. Direct currents of 12 000–200 000 A and voltages in the millions are involved; however, flow lasts only a fraction of a second.4

ELECTROCUTION

Most cases of electrocution occur in the workplace (about 60%) or at home (about 30%), where misuse of extension cables is the main culprit.6 Pathophysiological processes involved in true electrical injuries are poorly understood. The extent of injury depends on (i) the amount of current that passes through the body, (ii) the duration of the current, and (iii) the tissues traversed by the current (Table 75.1).

Table 75.1 Origin and pathophysiological effects of different levels of electrical injury

Current (A) Source Effects on victim
10–100 μA Earth leakage Microshock (ventricular fibrillation)
300–400 μA Faulty equipment Tingling (harmless)
> 1 mA Faulty equipment Pain (withdraw)
> 10 mA Faulty equipment Tetany (cannot let go)
> 100 mA Faulty equipment Macroshock (ventricular fibrillation)
> 1 A Faulty equipment Burns and tissue damage
> 1000 A High tension injury Severe burns and loss of limbs
> 12 000 A Lightning Coma, severe burns and loss of limbs

The extent of injury is most directly related to amperage. However, usually only the voltage involved is known. In general, lower voltages cause less injury, although voltages as low as 50 V have caused fatalities. An electric current passing through the body produces these main effects.

DEPOLARISATION OF MUSCLE CELLS

An alternating current of 30–200 mA will cause ventricular fibrillation.7 Currents in excess of 5 A cause sustained cardiac asystole, which is the principle used in defibrillation. Apart from ventricular fibrillation, other arrhythmias may occur. Myocardial damage is common and may result in ST and T-wave changes. Global left ventricular dysfunction may occur hours or days later, despite initial minimal ECG changes.8,9 Myocardial infarction has also been reported.10 Specific markers of myocardial injury, such as cardiac troponin, should be checked in all suspected cases of electrical injury to the heart.11

Tetanic contractions of skeletal muscle occur with currents in excess of 15–20 mA. The threshold is particularly low with alternating currents at the household frequency of 50–60 Hz. Tetanic contraction will prevent voluntary release of the source of electrocution, and violent muscle contractions may cause fractures of long bones and spinal vertebrae.6

NEUROLOGICAL INJURIES

Neurological injuries may be central or peripheral, and immediate or late in onset. Monoparesis may occur in affected limbs, and the median nerve is particularly vulnerable.6,13 Electrocution to the head may result in unconsciousness, paralysis of the respiratory centre, and late complications such as epilepsy, encephalopathy and parkinsonism.6,13 Spinal cord damage resulting in para- or tetraplegia can result from a current traversing both arms.6,13 Autonomic dysfunction may also occur, causing acute vasospasm or a late sympathetic dystrophy.6

ELECTRICAL HAZARDS IN ICU

The ICU has the potential to inflict both macroshock and microshock injuries to staff and patients. Potential sources of these electrical hazards are as follows.

INDUCTIVE CURRENTS

Inductive coupling from the strong magnetic fields produced by magnetic resonance imaging can cause overheating of wires and equipment. Severe burns have resulted from the use of pulse oximetry during magnetic resonance imaging, and specially designed wiring and probes are recommended.2 Similar problems can exist with any intravascular device containing wires, such as a pulmonary artery catheter. More recently, problems have arisen from the interference caused by personal computers, mobile phones and related devices with patient equipment. Many hospitals have banned the use of such devices in areas where patients are treated.

MEASURES TO PROTECT STAFF AND PATIENTS22,23

REFERENCES

1 McNulty SE, Cooper M, Staudt S. Transmitted radiofrequency current through a flow directed pulmonary artery catheter. Anesth Analg. 1994;78:587-589.

2 Peden CJ, Menon DK, Hall AS, et al. Magnetic resonance for the anaesthetist. Anaesthesia. 1992;47:508-517.

3 Hayes DL, Carrillo RG, Findlay GK, et al. State of the science: pacemaker and defibrillator interference from wireless communication devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996;19:1407-1409.

4 Apfelberg DB, Masters FW, Robinson DW. Pathophysiology and treatment of lightning injuries. J Trauma. 1974;14:453-460.

5 Bruner JMR. Hazards of electrical apparatus. Anesthesiology. 1976;28:396-424.

6 Fontneau NM, Mitchell A. Miscellaneous neurologic problems in the intensive care unit. In: Irwin RS, Cerra FB, Rippe JM, editors. Intensive Care Medicine. 4th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1999:2127-2135.

7 Loughman J, Watson AB. Electrical safety in hospitals and proposed standards. Med J Aust. 1971;2:349-355.

8 Lewin RF, Arditti A, Sclarovsky S. Non-invasive evaluation of cardiac injury. Br Heart J. 1983;49:190-192.

9 Jensen PJ, Thomsem PEB, Bagger JP, et al. Electrical injury causing ventricular arrhythmias. Br Heart J. 1987;57:279-283.

10 Walton AS, Harper RW, Coggins GL. Myocardial infarction after electrocution. Med J Aust. 1988;148:365-367.

11 Karras DJ, Kane DL. Serum markers in the emergency department diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2001;19:321-337.

12 Hunt JL, McManus WF, Haney WP, et al. Vascular lesions in acute electric injuries. J Trauma. 1974;14:461-473.

13 Solem L, Fischer RP, Strate RG. The natural history of electrical injury. J Trauma. 1977;17:487-492.

14 Ogren FP, Edmunds AL. Neuro-otologic findings in the lightning-injured patient. Semin Neurol. 1995;15:256-262.

15 Watson AB, Wright JS, Loughman J. Electrical thresholds for ventricular fibrillation in man. Med J Aust. 1973;1:1179-1182.

16 Burke JF, Quinby WC, Bondoc C, et al. Patterns of high tension electric injury in children and adolescents and their management. Am J Surg. 1977;133:492-494.

17 Hanson GC, McIlwaith GR. Lightning injury: two case histories and a review of management. Br Med J. 1973;4:271-274.

18 Australian Standard 2500. Guide to the Safe Use of Electricity in Patient Care. Sydney: Standards Association of Australia, 1988.

19 CEI-IEC 601-1&2. Medical Electrical Equipment, 2nd edn., Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 1988.

20 Herrmann D. A preview of IEC safety requirements for programmable electronic medical systems. Med Dev Diag Indust. 1995;17:106-111.

21 Early MW, Murray RH, Caloggero JM. National Electrical Code Handbook, 6th edn., Quincy: National Fire Protection Association, 1993.

22 Litt L, Ehrenwerth J. Electrical safety in the operating room: important old wine, disguised new bottles. Anesth Analg. 1994;78:417-419.

23 Ehrenwerth J. Electrical Safety in and around the Operating Room. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1994;123. ASA Refresher Course in Anesthesia