Published on 19/03/2015 by admin
Filed under Dermatology
Last modified 22/04/2025
This article have been viewed 5016 times
Bruce E. Katz, Doris M. Hexsel and Camile L. Hexsel
Evidence Levels: A Double-blind study B Clinical trial ≥ 20 subjects C Clinical trial < 20 subjects D Series ≥ 5 subjects E Anecdotal case reports
Cellulite consists of surface relief alterations resulting in depressions and raised areas and thus irregular appearance, such as an orange peel, cottage cheese or mattress-like appearance of the skin, located mainly on the thighs and buttocks but also on the arms, abdomen, legs, and other areas. Depressed lesions are due to the presence of fibrous septa that pull the skin surface down; raised areas result from the projection of underlying fat to the skin surface as shown on anatomical and imaging studies. Women are most frequently affected by this condition; this is due to the structure and anatomy of the subcutaneous septa compared to the structure of men. In addition, cellulite is aggravated by progressive skin laxity or flaccidity, localized fat deposition and obesity. Furthermore, other factors have been implicated in the pathogenesis of cellulite, such as hormonal, biochemical, inflammatory and circulatory factors.
Specific treatments:
Subcision, which treats the subcutaneous septae that pulls the skin down and addresses specifically cellulite depressions.
Devices that target the dermis and thus improve flaccidity and projection of fat, and devices that target localized fat.
Weight control to a normal body mass index (BMI).
Oral treatment.
Topical treatment.
Physical examination: patient in standing position with relaxed gluteus muscles. Determine morphologic characteristics of cellulite on each patient, which will help guide treatment option selection:
– presence and depth of cellulite depressions
– presence of localized fat and obesity
– presence of flaccidity and fat herniation
Pre- and post-treatment photographs (relaxed gluteus muscles)
Validated photonumeric scale: cellulite severity scale (CSS), for objective assessment of cellulite before and after different treatments
Pre-operatory investigations for subcision: PT, PTT and INR, history of coagulation disorders, use of medications that alter blood coagulation
The diagnosis is clinical. No imaging studies are required in clinical practice.
Hexsel DM, Dal’forno T, Hexsel CL. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2009; 23: 523–8.
A new photonumeric severity quantitative and qualitative scale was developed and validated; five key morphological aspects of cellulite were identified for comparison. Each item was graded from 0 to 3, allowing final classification of cellulite as mild, moderate, and severe, according to the sum of the scores of the CSS.
Hexsel DM, Abreu M, Rodrigues TC, Soirefmann M, do Prado DZ, Gamboa MM. Dermatol Surg 2009; 35: 1471–7.
Thirty female patients with cellulite depressions on the buttocks had underlying fibrous septa, which were thicker, ramified and perpendicular to the skin surface.
Hexsel DM, Mazzuco R. Int J Dermatol 2000; 39: 539–44.
Hexsel DM, Mazzuco R. An Bras Dermatol 1997; 72: 27–32.
Based on clinical assessment of pre- and post-treatment standardized photographs on 232 patients, subcision was shown to be efficacious in the treatment of high-grade cellulite. Targeted specifically for the treatment of major cellulite depressions on the skin surface of patients with cellulite through three action mechanisms: sectioning the connective tissue septa responsible for the depressions; provoking the formation of new connective tissue from blood components; and redistributing the adipose tissue and the mechanical forces between the adipose lobules.
DiBernardo BE. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31: 328–41.
Ten women with cellulite on their thighs received a single treatment with a 1440 nm pulsed laser delivered through a cannula. Mean skin thickness (as shown by ultrasound) and skin elasticity increased. Subjective physician evaluations indicated improvement in the appearance of cellulite.
Katz BE. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology; in press.
Fifteen women with cellulite were treated with 1440 nm pulsed laser with side firing fiber. There was improvement in cellulite in 68% of subjects on photographic evaluation by two independent observers, revealing good to excellent results by physician evaluation, and significant improvement in 65% of subjects assessed by three-dimensional surface imaging.
Gold MH, Khatri KA, Hails K, Weiss RA, Fournier N. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2011; 13: 13–20.
In this controlled, open-label, multicenter study, 83 subjects with mild to moderate cellulite received eight treatments with a device comprising a low-level, dual-wavelength diode laser (650 nm and 915 nm, to target fat), combined with heat induction and mechanical massage by suction (Smoothshapes™), in one leg, with the untreated contralateral thigh serving as a control. The maximum reduction in thigh circumference of the treated areas (−0.82 cm) occurred in the upper thigh at 1 month. There was subjective clinical improvement of the appearance of cellulite when comparing pre- and post-treatment photographs.
Nootheti PK, Magpantay A, Yosowitz G, Calderon S, Goldman MP. Lasers Surg Med 2006; 38: 908–12.
Twenty female patients were treated twice weekly for 6 weeks with randomization to VelaSmooth™ on one side and TriActive™ on the other side. Velasmooth™ combines infrared light (680–1550 nm) with bipolar radiofrequency and mechanical massage by vacuum suction. Triactive™ has six diode lasers (808/810 nm) combined with mechanical massage, suction and localized cooling. In both treatment groups, 25% of the patients had improvement in the appearance of cellulite, with average percentage improvement in roughness for the VelaSmooth™ versus TriActive™ of 7% and 25%, respectively. There was a perceived change grade of cellulite; 75% of subjects showed improvement in the VelaSmooth™ leg while 55% of subjects showed improvement in the TriActive™ leg. There was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) in all variables between the two treatment arms.
Alster TS, Tanzi EL. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2005; 7: 81–5.
Twenty adult women with moderate bilateral thigh and buttock cellulite, received eight biweekly treatments to a randomly selected side with a combined bipolar radiofrequency (RF), infrared (IR) light, and mechanical suction-based massage device (Velasmooth™), applied at 20 W RF, 20 W IR (700–1500 nm) light, and 200 millibar vacuum (750 mmHg negative pressure). Clinical improvement scores of photographs were made independently by two blinded physicians, and averaged approximately 50% after the series of treatments. Circumferential thigh measurements were reduced by 0.84 cm on the treated side.
Sadick NS, Mulholland RS. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2004; 6: 187–90.
Thirty-five females with cellulite on the thighs and/or buttocks were treated with the VelaSmooth device with eight to 16 treatments twice weekly. Based on physician assessment using pre- and post-treatment photographs, all patients showed some level of improvement in skin texture and cellulite. The mean decrease in thigh circumference was 0.8 inches.
Mlosek RK, Woźniak W, Malinowska S, Lewandowski M, Nowicki A. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2012; 26: 696–703.
In this randomized controlled study, 28 women with cellulite grade I–III underwent eight treatments with RF; 17 women were in the placebo group, in which the treatments were performed without emitting RF. The treatment began with 110 J/cm2, increased by 10–20 J/cm2 in subsequent procedures. Cellulite was reduced in 89.3% of the women who underwent RF treatment, based on the Nürnberger–Müller scale. In the placebo group, no statistically significant changes were observed.
Van der Lugt C, Romero C, Ancona D, Al-Zarouni M, Perera J, Trelles MA. Dermatol Ther 2009; 22: 74–84.
The buttocks of 50 patients were treated with bipolar RF technology (ThermaLipo™) at 6 J/cm2. Twelve weekly sessions were given for 12 minutes on each buttock, with the treatment end-point of 42°C external skin temperature. Based on the photography at baseline and at the 2-month assessment, the blinded independent clinicians’ objective assessment of the cellulite appearance demonstrated that results were apparent in 66% of patients.
Alexiades-Armenakas M, Dover JS, Arndt KA. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2008; 10: 148–53.
In this randomized, blinded, split-design study, 10 individuals with clinically observable excess of subcutaneous fat and cellulite (grades II–IV) on the thighs received up to six unilateral treatments (number of treatments at the investigator’s discretion and resulted in a mean of 4.22 and range of three to six treatments) at 2-week intervals with unipolar RF (Accent™). The untreated side of the thigh served as control. The results were assessed by two blinded investigators by using photographs and the authors’ cellulite grading scale. A novel quantitative four-point cellulite grading system was applied. All participants responded to treatment. The blinded evaluations of photographs using the cellulite grading scale demonstrated the following improvements in mean grading scores for the treated leg versus the control leg: 11.2% in dimple density; 10.7% in dimple distribution; 2.5% in dimple depth; and 8±2.8% mean score improvement.
Birnbaum L. Adv Ther 2001; 18: 225–9.
In this randomized clinical trial (n = 60), there was improvement in visible cellulite in 75% of subjects that received herbal anticellulite pill plus 800 mg of conjugated linoleic acid, with average reduction in thigh circumference of 2.2 cm. No improvement was observed in the group that received the herbal anticellulite pill alone.
Bertin C, Zunino H, Pittet JC, Beau P, Pineau P, Massonneau M, et al. J Cosmet Sci 2001; 52: 199–210.
A placebo-controlled double-blind study (n = 46) evaluated a topical anti-cellulite product that combined retinol microcapsules, caffeine, asiatic centella, L-carnitine, esculoside, and ruscogenine. The product was more effective than placebo in reducing cellulite appearance: decrease of the ‘orange peel’ effect and increase in cutaneous microcirculation.
Rao J, Gold MH, Goldman MP. J Cosmet Dermatol 2005; 4: 93–102.
This placebo-controlled study (n = 34 women with moderate degree of cellulite) assessed a cream containing a combination of caffeine, green tea extract, black pepper seed extract, citrus extract, ginger root extract, cinnamon bark extract and capsicum annum resin under occlusion with bioceramic-coated neoprene shorts. The average measured decrease in thigh circumference was 1.9 cm with active product versus 1.3 cm with placebo. Upon review of the pre- and post-study photographs, dermatologists noted greater improvement in the treated group in 68% of subjects.
Klingman AM, Pagnoni A, Stoudmayer T. J Dermatol Treat 1999; 10: 119–25.
This placebo-controlled study (n = 19) demonstrated improvement in cellulite on the side treated with topical retinol 0.3% on the thighs for 6 months, in 63.1% of the patients compared to the untreated side, by clinical dermatologic evaluation.
Lis-Balchin M. Phytother Res 1999; 13: 627–9.
This placebo-controlled clinical trial study showed lack of effect of the topical combination product Cellasene.
Lupi O, Semenovitch IJ, Treu C, Bottino D, Bouskela E. J Cosmet Dermatol 2007; 6: 102–7.
This controlled clinical study investigated 7% caffeine solution (n = 134). There was a reduction of 2.1 cm in the thigh circumference in >80% of women. No specific measurement of effect on the appearance of cellulite was assessed.
Sasaki GH, Oberg K, Tucker B, Gaston M. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2007; 9: 87–96.
In this placebo controlled, double-blinded study, nine subjects with grade II–III thigh cellulite were randomly treated twice daily with a phosphatidylcholine-based anti-cellulite gel on one thigh. Twice weekly, each thigh was exposed for a 15-minute treatment with LED array (660 nm and 950 nm) for 24 treatments. At the end of 3 months, eight out of nine thighs treated with the combination were downgraded to a lower cellulite grade by clinical examination, digital photography, and pinch test assessment. At the 18-month evaluation period for the eight responsive thighs, five thighs had reverted back to their original cellulite grading.
Collis N, Elliot LA, Sharpe C, Sharpe DT. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 1110–14. Discussion 1115–17.
This randomized, controlled trial assessed the efficacy of aminophylline cream and endermologie (n = 52). Neither of these two treatments was effective.
Treatment of Skin Disease Comprehensive Therapeutic Strategies 4e
WhatsApp us