Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation

Published on 01/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Pulmolory and Respiratory

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2146 times

Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation

Kenneth A. Wyka

Steady improvements in acute care are presenting new medical and social problems. As more patients survive acute illnesses, there are increasing numbers of individuals with chronic disorders. These chronic disorders are associated with a wide spectrum of physiologic, psychologic, and social disabilities. Foremost among these individuals with chronic disorders are individuals with chronic cardiopulmonary disease. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is expected to be the third leading cause of death in the United States by 2020.1

Although differences in diagnoses can have an impact on treatment outcomes and survival, patients with chronic pulmonary disorders have much in common. All of these patients have difficulty coping with the physiologic limitations of their diseases, and these physiologic limitations result in many psychosocial problems. The end result often is an unsatisfactory quality of life. The high incidence of repeated hospitalizations and the progressive disability of these patients require well-organized programs of rehabilitative care. This chapter provides foundational knowledge regarding the goals, methods, and issues involved in providing planned programs of rehabilitation for individuals with chronic pulmonary disorders.

Definitions and Goals

The Council on Rehabilitation defines rehabilitation as “the restoration of the individual to the fullest medical, mental, emotional, social, and vocational potential of which he or she is capable.”2 The overall goal is to maximize functional ability and to minimize the impact the disability has on the individual, the family, and the community. Pulmonary rehabilitation is the “art of medical practice wherein an individually tailored, multidisciplinary program is formulated, which through accurate diagnosis, therapy, emotional support, and education stabilizes or reverses both the physio- and psychopathology of pulmonary diseases and attempts to return the patient to the highest possible functional capacity allowed by his or her pulmonary handicap and overall life situation.”3

The general goals of pulmonary rehabilitation are to control and alleviate symptoms, restore functional capabilities as much as possible, and improve quality of life.4 Pulmonary rehabilitation does not reverse or stop progression of the disease, but it can improve a patient’s overall quality of life. Health care providers from various disciplines are needed to reach these goals.

Historical Perspective

Pulmonary rehabilitation is not a new concept. In 1952, Barach and colleagues5 recommended reconditioning programs for patients with chronic lung disease to help improve their ability to walk without dyspnea. Decades passed before clinicians paid any attention to this concept. Instead of having their patients participate in reconditioning programs, most physicians simply prescribed oxygen (O2) therapy and bed rest. The result was a vicious cycle of skeletal muscle deterioration, progressive weakness and fatigue, and increasing levels of dyspnea including at rest. Patients became homebound, then room-bound, and eventually bed-bound. Improved avenues of therapy and rehabilitation were needed.

In 1962, Pierce and associates6 published results confirming Barach’s insight into the value of reconditioning. They observed that patients with COPD who participated in physical reconditioning exhibited lower pulse rates, respiratory rates, minute volumes, and carbon dioxide (CO2) production during exercise. However, they also found that these benefits occurred without significant changes in pulmonary function. Soon thereafter, Paez and associates7 showed that reconditioning could improve both the efficiency of motion and O2 use in patients with COPD. Subsequently, Christie8 showed that the benefits of reconditioning could be achieved on an outpatient basis with minimal supervision. Since Christie’s work in 1968, other investigators have continued to research the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation.

The available evidence at the present time consistently indicates that pulmonary rehabilitation benefits patients with chronic obstructive and restrictive pulmonary disease.912 When combined with smoking cessation, optimization of blood gases, and proper medication use, pulmonary rehabilitation offers the best treatment option for patients with symptomatic pulmonary disease. Programs for pulmonary rehabilitation must be founded on the sound application of current knowledge in the clinical and social sciences. In fall 2006, the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR) released their evidence-based guidelines relating to pulmonary rehabilitation aimed at improving the way pulmonary rehabilitation programs are designed, implemented, and evaluated through patient outcomes.13

Scientific Basis

Rehabilitation must focus on the patient as a whole and not solely on the underlying disease. For this reason, effective pulmonary rehabilitation programs combine knowledge from both the clinical and the social sciences. Knowledge from the clinical sciences can help quantify the degree of physiologic impairment and establish outcome expectations for reconditioning. Application of the social sciences is helpful in determining the psychological, social, and vocational impact of the disability on the patient and family and in establishing ways to improve the patient’s quality of life.

Physical Reconditioning

At rest, an individual maintains homeostasis by balancing external, internal, and cellular respiration. Physical activity, such as exercise, increases energy demands. To maintain homeostasis during exercise, the cardiorespiratory system must keep pace. Figure 50-1 shows how the body responds to exercise. Ventilation and circulation increase to supply tissues and cells with additional O2 and to eliminate the higher levels of CO2 produced by metabolism.

As depicted in Figure 50-2, O2 consumption and CO2 production also increase in linear fashion as exercise intensity increases. If the body cannot deliver sufficient O2 to meet the demands of energy metabolism, blood lactate levels increase above normal. In exercise physiology, this point is called the onset of blood lactate accumulation (OBLA). As this excess lactic acid is buffered, CO2 levels increase, and the stimulus to breathe increases. The result is an abrupt upswing in both CO2 and image (referred to as the ventilatory threshold). Beyond this point, metabolism becomes anaerobic, the efficiency of energy production decreases, lactic acid accumulates, and fatigue sets in.

Patients with COPD who lack adequate pulmonary function have severe limitations to their exercise capabilities. Their high rate of CO2 production during exercise results in respiratory acidosis and a shortness of breath out of proportion to the level of activity. In addition, as ventilation increases, the rate of O2 consumption in a patient with COPD increases significantly (Figure 50-3). Together, these factors limit patient tolerance for any significant increase in physical activity.

Pulmonary rehabilitation must include efforts to recondition patients physically and increase their exercise tolerance. Reconditioning involves strengthening essential muscle groups, improving overall O2 use, and enhancing the body’s cardiovascular response to physical activity (Box 50-1).

Psychosocial Support

If the overall goal of pulmonary rehabilitation is to improve the quality of patients’ lives, physical reconditioning alone is insufficient. Psychosocial indicators generally are good predictors of morbidity in patients with COPD. Studies show that the relative success of reconditioning plays less of a role in determining whether patients complete a program than meeting their psychosocial support needs.14

There is a well-established relationship between physical, mental, and social well-being in humans. Everyday life is full of such relationships, such as the physical fatigue that follows a period of emotional tension. Many of these associations are part of normal human behavior. However, emotional states such as stress can cause or aggravate an existing physical problem. Likewise, physical manifestations of disease, such as recurrent dyspnea, can worsen stress.

The progressive nature of COPD can negatively affect the patient’s overall outlook on his or her disease and reduce motivation to adapt to its consequences. The best medical care available can be negated, and a patient can experience a progressively downhill course because of an unfavorable mental state. Patients with COPD often have a tendency to develop severe anxiety, hostility, and stress as a direct consequence of their disability. Because patients are fearful of economic loss and death, they can develop hostility toward the disease and often toward the people around them.

In terms of social function, the physiologic impairment of chronic lung disease combined with other variables can severely restrict a patient’s ability to perform routine tasks requiring physical exertion. Intolerance for physical exertion lessens patients’ social activity. More important, however, is patients’ potential loss of confidence in their ability to care for themselves that can accompany such impairments, followed by resultant loss of feelings of dignity and self-worth.

Figure 50-4 presents elements of how chronic lung disease and other variables can have an impact on a patient’s quality of life. It is here that the link between the physical reconditioning and psychosocial support components of rehabilitation becomes most evident. By reducing exercise intolerance and enhancing the body’s cardiovascular response to physical activity, patients can develop a more independent and active lifestyle. For some patients, simply being able to walk to the market or play with their grandchildren can contribute to a greater feeling of social importance and self-worth. For others, physical conditioning may allow a return to near-normal levels of activity, including vocational pursuits.

Many patients disabled with pulmonary disease are in their economically productive years and are anxious to return to economic self-sufficiency. For these patients, occupational retraining and job placement are key ingredients in a good rehabilitation program. An occupational therapist can play a vital role here and should be included, if possible, as a member of the interdisciplinary rehabilitation team and in the pulmonary rehabilitation program. The pulmonary rehabilitation program should be based on the individual needs and expectations of each patient. Each patient’s physical ability and his or her education, past experience, aptitude, and personality should be considered. Evaluation and placement of the rehabilitation patient require the skills of vocational counselors and occupational therapists and the cooperation of business and industry.

Structure of A Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program

Program Goals and Objectives

Pulmonary rehabilitation programs vary in their design and implementation but generally share common goals. Examples of these common goals are listed in Box 50-2. These general goals assist planners in formulating more specific program objectives. When determining objectives, both patients and members of the rehabilitation team should have input. These objectives should always be stated in measurable terms because this helps facilitate the determination of both patient outcomes and the therapeutic success and value of pulmonary rehabilitation. Depending on the specific needs of the participants, program objectives can include the following:

When program objectives are specifically defined and structured in a measurable way, strategies can be tailored to ensure the maximum results and benefit. Demonstration of program effectiveness also becomes easier and more acceptable by the medical community. However, benefits realized by participating patients are not always easy to identify and may be controversial.

Patient Evaluation and Selection

Before beginning a pulmonary rehabilitation program, clinicians need to define and establish criteria for entry or selection. Patient selection requires comprehensive evaluation and testing.

Patient Evaluation

Pulmonary rehabilitation programs must have a qualified medical director, usually a pulmonologist, to provide overall medical direction of the program and to screen prospective patients.17 Patient evaluation begins with a complete patient history—medical, psychologic, vocational, and social. A well-designed patient questionnaire and interview form assist with this step. The patient history should be followed by a complete physical examination (see Chapter 15). A recent chest film, resting electrocardiogram (ECG), complete blood count, serum electrolytes, and urinalysis provide additional information on the patient’s current medical status (see Chapter 16).

To determine the patient’s cardiopulmonary status and exercise capacity, both pulmonary function testing and a cardiopulmonary exercise evaluation may be performed. Pulmonary function testing includes assessment of pulmonary ventilation, lung volume determinations, diffusing capacity (DLCO), and spirometry before and after bronchodilator use (see Chapter 19).

The cardiopulmonary exercise evaluation serves two key purposes in pulmonary rehabilitation. First, it quantifies the patient’s initial exercise capacity. This quantification provides the basis for the exercise prescription (including setting a target heart rate) and yields the baseline data for assessing a patient’s progress over time. In addition, the evaluation helps determine the degree of hypoxemia or desaturation that can occur with exercise; this provides the objective basis for titrating O2 therapy during the exercise program. To guide practitioners in implementing exercise evaluation, the American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC) has published clinical practice guidelines on exercise testing for evaluation of hypoxemia or desaturation or both18 and pulmonary rehabilitation. Excerpts from these guidelines appear in Clinical Practice Guidelines 50-1 and 50-2.19

50-1

Exercise Testing for Evaluation of Hypoxemia, Desaturation, or Both

AARC Clinical Practice Guideline (Excerpts)*

Contraindications

Absolute contraindications include the following:

Relative contraindications to exercise testing include the following:

Precautions and Possible Complications

Indications for ending testing include the following:

Abnormal responses that may require discontinuation of exercise include (1) increase in systolic blood pressure to >250 mm Hg or diastolic pressure to >120 mm Hg, (2) increase in systolic pressure of >20 mm Hg from resting level, (3) mental confusion or headache, (4) cyanosis, (5) nausea or vomiting, (6) muscle cramping.


*For the complete guidelines, see American Association for Respiratory Care: AARC clinical practice guideline: exercise testing for evaluation of hypoxemia and/or desaturation. Respir Care 46:514, 2001.

Refer to the Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale (immediately following).

50-2   Pulmonary Rehabilitation

AARC Clinical Practice Guideline (Excerpts)*


*For the complete guidelines, see American Association for Respiratory Care: AARC clinical practice guideline: pulmonary rehabilitation. Respir Care 47:617, 2002.

Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale (With Dyspnea Descriptors)

10 Maximal (worst possible you can imagine)
9 Very, very severe
8 Very, very severe
7 Very severe
6 Very severe
5 Severe
4 Somewhat severe
3 Moderate
2 Slight
1 Very slight
0.5 Very, very slight (just noticeable)
0 None at all

image

The exercise evaluation procedure involves serial or continuous measurements of several physiologic parameters during various graded levels of exercise on either an ergometer or a treadmill (Box 50-3). To allow for steady-state equilibration, these graded levels are usually spaced at 3-minute intervals. Work levels are increased progressively until either (1) the patient cannot tolerate a higher level or (2) an abnormal or hazardous response occurs.

Blood gas and arterial saturation measures are obtained at rest and at peak exercise. Samples from single arterial punctures are as good as samples drawn from indwelling catheters. If the peak exercise puncture is unsuccessful, a sample drawn within 10 to 15 seconds of test termination usually suffices. Owing to inherent problems, pulse oximetry has a limited but nonetheless important role in exercise evaluation. The best use of pulse oximetry is as a monitor to warn clinicians of gross desaturation events during testing. In addition, the pulse oximeter can be used to assess the patient’s response to supplemental O2 during exercise.

Relative contraindications to exercise testing include the following:

Exercise evaluation also can help differentiate among patients with primary respiratory or cardiac limitations to increased work capacity. Table 50-1 summarizes these key similarities and differences. Besides helping to differentiate between the underlying cause of exercise intolerance, test results can assist in placing patients in the appropriate type of rehabilitation program.

TABLE 50-1

Exercise Parameters Distinguishing Cardiac and Ventilatory (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) Limitations

Parameter* Cardiac COPD
Maximum image
Maximum HR N or ↓
O2 pulse N
Maximum image
image N
PaO2 N
PaCO2
image
VT N

image

*HR, Heart rate; image, cardiac output; image, ratio of ventilation to CO2 production; image, oxygen consumption; VT, ventilatory threshold.

N, Normal; ↑, increased; ↓, decreased.

Modified from Lane EE, Walker JF: Clinical arterial blood gas analysis, St Louis, 1987, Mosby.

To minimize patient risk during exercise evaluation, certain safety measures are implemented. First, the patient should undergo a physical examination just before the test, including a resting ECG. Second, a qualified physician should be present throughout the entire test. Third, emergency resuscitation equipment (cardiac crash cart with monitor, defibrillator, O2, cardiac drugs, suction equipment, and airway equipment) must be readily available. Fourth, staff conducting and assisting with the procedure should be certified in basic and advanced life-support techniques. Last, the test should be terminated promptly whenever indicated.

With regard to test preparation, patients should fast 8 hours before the procedure. If the purpose of the test is to formulate an exercise prescription, the patient can take his or her regular medications. The patient should wear comfortable, loose-fitting clothing and footwear with adequate traction for treadmill or ergometer activity. The mouthpiece or face mask used during the test should be sized properly and fit comfortably with no leaks. Test conditions should be as standardized as possible to allow for comparison of results before and after rehabilitation periodically from year to year as the patient is treated and followed.

Patient Selection

Patients most likely to benefit from participation in pulmonary rehabilitation are patients with persistent symptoms caused by COPD who have low maximum O2 uptakes at baseline. Pulmonary rehabilitation should be a part of the discharge planning process when a patient is released from the hospital after an exacerbation of the existing chronic respiratory condition. The feasibility of rehabilitation should be reviewed with the patient, physician, and respiratory therapist (RT). Other indications for pulmonary rehabilitation are listed in Box 50-4. Regardless of underlying conditions, patients also should be ex-smokers. Any patients who smoke should enroll in a smoking cessation program before starting pulmonary rehabilitation. Patients are excluded from pulmonary rehabilitation activities if (1) concurrent problems limit or preclude participation in exercise or (2) their condition is complicated by malignant neoplasms, such as lung cancer (see Box 50-4).

Objectively, candidates considered for inclusion in a pulmonary rehabilitation program generally fall into one of the following groups:20

• Patients in whom there is a respiratory limitation to exercise resulting in termination at a level less than 75% of the predicted maximum O2 consumption (image)

• Patients in whom there is significant irreversible airway obstruction with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of less than 2 L or an FEV1% (ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity [FVC]) of less than 60% (consider the Global Initiative on Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] standards for COPD severity here)

• Patients in whom there is significant restrictive lung disease with a total lung capacity (TLC) of less than 80% of predicted and single breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) of less than 80% of predicted

• Patients with pulmonary vascular disease in whom single breath DLCO is less than 80% of predicted or in whom exercise is limited to less than 75% of maximum predicted O2 consumption (predicted image)

Groups or classes for pulmonary rehabilitation should be kept homogeneous. Placing individuals in a program who are at different stages of cardiopulmonary disability can be very defeating. Individuals with mild to moderate impairment may become discouraged on how severe lung disease can become, and individuals with severe impairment may feel they cannot keep up with or maintain the level of activity exhibited by others with less severe impairment. It is best to group patients together on the basis of severity and overall ability. In this way, patients can participate, compete, and progress together in the program without frustration, fear, or loss of motivation.

Program Design

A good design helps achieve specific programming objectives with the selected group of participating patients. Key design considerations involve both format and content, with emphasis on patient reconditioning and education.

Format

Programs can use either an open-ended or a closed design, with or without planned follow-up sessions. With an open-ended format, patients enter the program and progress through it until they achieve certain predetermined objectives. There is no set time frame. Depending on his or her condition, needs, motivation, and performance, an individual patient can complete an open-ended program over weeks or months. This format is good for self-directed patients or patients with scheduling difficulties. It also may be the best format for patients requiring individual attention. The major drawback of the open-ended format is the lack of group support and involvement. In addition, insurance reimbursement may be a factor when the program is open-ended.

The more traditional closed design uses a set time period to cover program content. These programs usually run 6 to 16 weeks, with classes meeting one to three times a week. However, insurance coverage may dictate how many sessions make up the program. Medicare covers 36 initial sessions with possible coverage of another 36 sessions if the patient qualifies and would benefit from the additional rehabilitation sessions. Class sessions usually last up to 2 hours. Presentations are more formal, and group support and involvement is encouraged. A major drawback to this format is that the schedule determines program completion, rather than the objectives. However, most programs allow patients to reenroll if the anticipated improvements are not achieved.

Regardless of the format used, long-term improvements cannot be expected without planned follow-up.21 Follow-up must be ongoing and available to all patients who complete the program. Frequently, this essential element of the process is difficult, especially when it is not covered by most insurance plans, but program coordinators must ensure that it is routinely scheduled. Follow-up or reinforcement could be open-ended (available during regular rehabilitation sessions and offering open attendance) or could be scheduled weekly, monthly, bimonthly, or quarterly. The important thing is to have some type of follow-up available.22,23

Content

The content of the rehabilitation program usually combines physical reconditioning with education activities. Table 50-2 outlines a sample session incorporating these two complementary components. Programs providing reconditioning or education alone are unlikely to be effective.

TABLE 50-2

Sample Pulmonary Rehabilitation Session

Component Focus Time Frame
Educational Welcome (group interaction) 5 min
Review of program diaries (activities of past week) 20 min
Presentation of educational topic 20 min
Questions, answers, and group discussion 15 min
Physical reconditioning Physical activity and reconditioning 45 min
Individual goal setting and session summary 15 min
Total session   120 min (2 hr)

image

As shown in Table 50-2, the ideal rehabilitation session should last about 2 hours. Group size, available equipment, and group interaction dictate session length. Patients should arrive 10 to 15 minutes before a scheduled session to allow for informal group interaction and support. Classes should begin on time and conclude promptly as scheduled. Educational presentations should be brief and to the point. The use of audiovisuals or demonstrations should enhance understanding. To facilitate patient comprehension, the language should be simple, and unnecessary technical terms or concepts should be avoided. Handouts that enhance certain points made during a presentation are both useful and desirable. A folder or notebook in which program activities may be recorded and handout materials kept should be maintained by each patient.

Physical Reconditioning

The physical reconditioning component of the pulmonary rehabilitation program consists primarily of an exercise prescription with target heart rate based on the results of the patient’s initial exercise evaluation. For most patients, an initial target heart rate is set using Karvonen’s formula, or estimated as 20 beats/min greater than resting rate. Because of the severity of ventilatory impairment, some patients begin exercise reconditioning without a prescribed target heart rate.

Typically, the exercise prescription includes the following four related components:24,25

To ensure success with physical reconditioning, patients must actively participate both at the rehabilitation facility and at home. While exercising at the facility, patients should be monitored by pulse oximetry. Blood pressure measurements may also be made, but these are usually done at the start and end of each session unless a patient’s condition dictates otherwise. In addition, exercise sessions should be upbeat. Lively music helps to maintain a positive atmosphere. Clinicians must remember that these patients are ill and require a nurturing attitude from team members, family, and the group itself.

To ensure compliance with the program, a daily log or diary sheet is completed. Figure 50-5 depicts a sample log sheet that makes up a section of the patient manual. These log or diary forms are reviewed each time the patient attends a session. Based on this information, further individualized reconditioning goals are set.

Lower extremity exercises may include either walking or bicycling. Patients can walk on a stationary treadmill (with set goals for distance or time and grade) or on a flat, smooth surface. Patients can bicycle on an exercise cycle. With the treadmill or stationary bicycle, patients are required to cover a certain distance or duration every day that they are in the program. Commonly, the duration is set to 30 minutes daily, with patients encouraged to increase both their distance and equipment tension or resistance as tolerated. Patients with significant orthopedic disabilities can participate in aerobic aquatic exercises.

Walking also improves overall conditioning; this usually takes the form of a 6- or 12-minute walk performed once a day, depending on the patient’s condition and tolerance. These walk exercises are a convenient way for patients to carry out a well-defined amount of activity with increasing vigor and results over a number of weeks. During the 6 or 12 minutes, patients should walk on flat ground for as far as possible. If severe dyspnea occurs, they should stop and rest, with the rest time included as part of the time interval. After resting briefly, they should try to continue walking at a comfortable pace. The objective is to walk as far as possible during the allotted time. Landmarks such as telephone poles, city blocks, or actual distance measures can be used to quantify progress. Under adverse weather conditions, walking can be done indoors in shopping malls, stores, or long hallways. Patients should record their progress in their manuals or diaries.

Aerobic upper extremity exercises improve rehabilitation outcomes for patients whose regular activities involve lifting or raising the arms.24,26 Arm ergometers or rowing machines are available for this purpose; however, simple calisthenics using either a broomstick or free weights (by prescription and with training) are a satisfactory alternative. Upper body endurance generally is more limited, with many patients capable of only 2 to 3 minutes of daily activity to start. This limitation usually is related to the fact that patients may revert to using accessory muscles for breathing while doing the upper body exercise. Patients need to breathe diaphragmatically and perform the exercises at the same time. Arm exercises should get progressively longer, up to 20 minutes if possible. Upper body conditioning helps patients perform numerous useful activities at home and can increase overall physical endurance. As with other activity, patients should record daily results in their logs or manuals.

Although controversy exists, ventilatory muscle training probably can enhance the benefits of these more traditional exercises.27 Ventilatory muscle training is based on the concept of progressive resistance. By imposing progressively greater loads on the inspiratory muscles (mainly the diaphragm) over time, the patient’s strength and endurance should increase. These improvements should increase the patient’s exercise tolerance.

Figure 50-6 shows a typical inspiratory resistance breathing device. The device is an adjustable flow resistor with a one-way breathing valve. The inspiratory load is created by forcing the patient to inhale through a restricted orifice. Varying the size of this orifice varies the inspiratory load, as do changes in the patient’s inspiratory flow. During expiration, gas flows unimpeded out the one-way exhalation valve. Other types of devices are also available. One model replaces the variable size orifice with an adjustable spring-loaded valve. This valve ensures a constant load regardless of how quickly or slowly the patient breathes.

Because variations in breathing strategy during ventilatory muscle training can affect outcomes, proper patient evaluation, training, and follow-up are required. The RT initially measures the patient’s maximum inspiratory pressure (PImax) using a calibrated pressure manometer. The RT next compares the patient’s maximum with established norms (Table 50-3). This preliminary measure of inspiratory pressure helps to establish initial loads and provides the basis for the subsequent monitoring of patient progress.

TABLE 50-3

Normal Maximum Inspiratory Pressure by Age and Sex

  pimax from residual volume (cm h2o), mean ± sd
Age Group (yr) Male Female
9-18 96 ± 35 90 ± 25
19-50 127 ± 28 91 ± 25
51-70 112 ± 20 77 ± 18
>70 76 ± 27 66 ± 18

image

From Rochester DF, Hyatt RE: Respiratory muscle failure, Med Clin North Am 67:573, 1983.

Before beginning ventilatory muscle training, the patient should assume a position that relaxes the abdominal muscles, such as the position used for cough training. If using a flow resistive device, the RT begins at the maximum orifice setting, while measuring the inspiratory pressure generated through the monitoring or O2 adapter (a second adapter may be needed if the patient is receiving supplemental O2). The RT encourages the patient to breathe slowly through the device, at a rate no greater than 10 to 12 breaths/min. If the patient’s inspiratory pressure is less than 30% of the measured PImax, the next smaller orifice is selected, with this procedure repeated until the 30% effort is consistently achieved.

At this point, the RT instructs the patient to exercise with the device in one or two regular daily sessions lasting 10 to 15 minutes. As the level of resistance becomes more tolerable over time, the patient should progressively increase session duration up to 30 minutes. A self-maintained log of treatment times can help motivate the patient and assist the RT in subsequent progress monitoring.

Educational Component

The educational portion of the program covers topics that are both useful and necessary to the patient. Table 50-4 lists examples of topics covered during a 12-week rehabilitation program. Recommendations regarding the best facilitators for each session are included. Naturally, other topics can be included depending on the program schedule, but in terms of relative importance, the ones listed in Table 50-4 generally have the highest priority.

TABLE 50-4

Typical Educational Topic Schedule for a 12-Week Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program

Session (Week) Topic(s) Recommended Facilitator(s)
1 Introduction and welcome; program orientation Program administrator or rehabilitation team
2 Respiratory structure, function, and pathology Physician or RT
3 Breathing control methods PT or RT
4 Relaxation and stress management Clinical psychologist
5 Proper exercise techniques and personal routines PT or RT
6 Methods to aid secretion clearance (bronchial hygiene) PT or RT
7 Home oxygen and aerosol therapy RT
8 Medications—their use and abuse Pharmacist, physician, or nurse practitioner
9 Medications—use of MDIs and spacers RT
10 Dietary guidelines and good nutrition Dietitian or nutritionist
11 Recreation and vocational counseling Occupational therapist
  Activities of daily living  
12 Follow-up planning and program evaluation Rehabilitation team
  Graduation  

image

MDIs, Metered dose inhalers; PT, physical therapist; RT, respiratory therapist.

The actual content of these sessions follows. These topics should be presented in an orderly, coherent fashion using supplementary audiovisual tools and demonstrations, where appropriate. Team members should allocate sufficient time both for the class sessions themselves and for setup and breakdown of equipment.

The program facilitator or leader must ensure that sessions begin on time and encourage maximum participation by each patient. If available, health care professionals such as dietitians, occupational therapists, physical therapists, and psychologists should be invited to present their respective topics and discuss the subject matter with the group. In addition to technical knowledge, session leaders must possess group facilitation skills and be able to motivate patients to participate both in class and at home and to adhere to program guidelines. This task is not an easy one, but it can be accomplished with patience and persistence. The desired end result is to help patients lead more productive lives with decreased hospitalizations.

Program Implementation

In 1987, the AARC and the AACVPR jointly conducted the first national survey of pulmonary rehabilitation programs. This National Pulmonary Rehabilitation Survey was published in 1988 and showed the variation existing in rehabilitation program structure, content, staffing, and cost throughout the United States.28 In 2006, the ACCP, in conjunction with the AACVPR, released new evidence-based guidelines pertaining to the design and implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation programs.13

Staffing

Pulmonary rehabilitation is a multidisciplinary endeavor. Team care is enhanced by involving various health care professionals in the planning, implementation, and evaluation components of the program (Figure 50-7). It is recommended that any staff conducting pulmonary rehabilitation program sessions be certified in basic life support or advanced cardiac life support through the American Heart Association. In addition to professional involvement, family members are needed to provide feedback and ensure that instructions and the exercise prescription are carried out at home.

Facilities

Location and quality of facilities can directly affect patient attendance. Patients are less likely to attend programs that are inaccessible to public transportation, have poor parking arrangements, or are physically difficult to reach. The facility must be wheelchair accessible. For elderly patients who do not drive, arrangements can be made with community organizations to provide transportation to and from the program. Ideally, the facility should provide two separate rooms for the program—one room for educational activities and one room for physical reconditioning. Rooms should be spacious and comfortable with adequate lighting, ventilation, and temperature control. Chairs should be comfortable with good back support. Restroom facilities need to be readily accessible. A room for individual counseling is helpful, but any private office would suffice. It is also preferable to have pulmonary function testing and blood gas analysis capabilities on site. If this space is used by other departments for other functions, proper scheduling of rehabilitation sessions needs to be considered.

Scheduling

Another aspect of program implementation involves timely scheduling of the rehabilitation sessions. With the open-ended format, patients can attend rehabilitation at a time convenient to them as long as the facility is open and staffed accordingly. With the closed format, sessions are scheduled one to three times per week for 1 to 3 hours, with programs running 8 to 16 weeks. The length of the program often depends on insurance coverage and expected reimbursement for sessions attended. Class times need to be scheduled when the largest number of patients can attend. Traffic patterns, bus schedules, and availability of rides are concerns that need to be discussed. The ideal situation involves a separate area set aside for pulmonary rehabilitation with a dedicated staff of professionals conducting the program; this makes scheduling for either open-ended or closed programs easier and more manageable. Sessions can be conducted in the morning, afternoon, or evening and on weekends if necessary. Proper scheduling helps to encourage participation and removes potential stumbling blocks, which could undermine the rehabilitation process.

Class Size

Class size is another issue that must be addressed. Theoretically, a rehabilitation program could be conducted with 1 participant or 15 or more, depending on available space, equipment, and staff. However, to foster group identity, interaction, and support, small group discussions are encouraged. The ideal class size should range from 3 to 10 participants. Keeping the class size manageable facilitates vital group interaction processes and allows for more individualized attention. These factors help sustain motivation, reducing the likelihood of participant attrition.

Mini Clini

Facilities Planning for Pulmonary Rehabilitation

Solution

Because the hospital is currently in the planning process for starting a pulmonary rehabilitation program and has not made a final facility selection, the RT is in a key position to assess, among other areas, issues related to the proposed site. Patient attendance and participation would be adversely affected if the facility is unreachable, such as at the top of a hill. If the location is in a high crime or unsafe area with little or no security, this too would discourage patients from attending. As is true with any program, public transportation that does not permit accessibility to the proposed facility would be a limiting factor, as would little or no available parking. Numerous other facility considerations outside the actual physical location of the rehabilitation center would also need to be addressed. The current square footage of available space and room for future expansion would need to be evaluated relative to anticipated needs, as would whether the facility itself is wheelchair accessible with no barriers present.

Naturally, economic concerns surface when class size is considered. Although program quality must be the first priority, program viability realistically depends on the number of participants. Programs generally should be conducted with a class size that is comfortable with regard to space and staffing and that is economically feasible. Such an approach helps ensure that programs produce meaningful patient outcomes.

Equipment

Both the instruction and the reconditioning component of the program require equipment. To meet the educational needs of the program, a blackboard or flipchart along with a PowerPoint projector, screen, overhead projector, and cassette or CD tape player are needed. A videotape or DVD player with monitor may also be helpful, especially if individualized instruction or commercially available programs are used. Also, slides, tapes, videos, and formal learning packages dealing with the educational topics covered during the rehabilitation program should be available for group and individualized presentation. These can be purchased from outside sources or designed and developed in-house.

For physical reconditioning, stationary bicycles, treadmills, rowing machines, upper extremity ergometers, weights, pulse oximeters, and inspiratory resistance breathing devices constitute the minimum equipment requirements. The quantity of equipment needed depends on class size, scheduling, and available space. Sufficient equipment should be on hand to keep all patients exercising and to monitor their activity. Emergency O2 and bronchodilator medications should also be maintained in the rehabilitation area. Equipment guidelines for a class of 6 to 10 participants include the following: five stationary bicycles, two treadmills, two rowing machines, two upper extremity ergometers, five pulse oximeters for monitoring heart rate and O2 saturation, one emergency O2 cylinder (E), and bronchodilator medications. In addition, each patient should be supplied with an inspiratory resistance breathing device.

Because equipment can be expensive, care must be taken in its selection and purchase. Devices and appliances should be durable, easy and safe to use, simple to maintain, and not overly expensive. Initially, basic items are purchased. As a program develops and expands, equipment resources can be enhanced. Other program needs include the following:

By considering all of the factors needed for effective implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation, programs have lower patient attrition and a greater chance for overall success. As programs are conducted, regular evaluations must be made by both patients and staff. Needed changes should be implemented on an ongoing basis. Only in this manner can one expect continued refinement of the process and improvement in patient outcomes.

Cost, Fees, and Reimbursement

Rehabilitation programs usually project their fees based on the average cost per participant. According to regional labor and material prices, costs vary throughout the United States. Several factors must be considered when projecting program costs (Box 50-5). The larger the class size and the more participants involved in the overall program, the lower the cost would be per patient. The aim should be to offer and conduct the highest quality program possible at a reasonable cost that meets any existing budgetary constraints.

When determining patient charges, consideration must also be given to the type and amount of funding that has been received to offset program expenses and available insurance reimbursement. Preprogram and postprogram testing and evaluations naturally generate revenues but should not be included in the formulation of program charges. However, payments for pulmonary function testing, exercise testing, arterial blood gas analysis, and other evaluations may help to keep a pulmonary rehabilitation program financially viable.

Charges for an entire program or for each session must be structured in a way that does not deter patient attendance. Many patients with a chronic pulmonary disease are on a fixed income and have other living and medical expenses. A happy medium between a patient’s ability to pay and program expenses must be identified. Funding from local charitable organizations, foundations, or agencies such as the American Lung Association can help ease the financial burden. The most comprehensive and effective program available can have no impact if patients are unwilling or unable to attend and participate because of financial limitations.

Along with health care costs in general, the cost of providing pulmonary rehabilitation has increased over the years. Nationwide charges for pulmonary rehabilitation vary, depending on program length and, most importantly, insurance coverage. With most insurance plans reimbursing programs at 80% after a deductible, each patient would be responsible for the remaining 20% or copayment. Additional or supplemental medical coverage may cover this balance.

Charges for participation in these programs and inpatient rehabilitation reimbursement policies vary throughout the United States. In 1982, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS, formerly the Health Care Financing Administration) published the final rules for Medicare reimbursement guidelines for comprehensive outpatient rehabilitative facilities (CORFs). Under Part B of Medicare, the scope of services of a CORF includes reimbursement for outpatient activities and one home visit. Reimbursement requires that the CORF meet the conditions of participation established in section 933 of Public Law 96-499; this also includes provisions for certification of the program. To establish reimbursement mechanisms, each CORF must present its program description and anticipated results to local third-party payers. The AACVPR also has developed guidelines for program design, implementation, and recognition.

By following recognized guidelines, Medicare has established an allowable charge for pulmonary rehabilitation and reimburses 80% of this rate after the patient meets the annual prescribed deductible. In the past, inpatient and outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programs obtained reimbursement from third-party payers by charging for rehabilitation sessions as physical therapy exercises for COPD, reconditioning exercise sessions, office visits with therapeutic exercises, serial pulse oximetry determinations, or physician office visits. The goal was to obtain as much insurance reimbursement as possible, decreasing the financial burden on the patient. Box 50-6 lists all possible sources of reimbursement.29,30

There is now a national coverage policy for pulmonary rehabilitation under Medicare, which took effect on January 1, 2010, as a result of the passage of HR 6331. Programs have to obtain reimbursement for their Medicare beneficiaries following accepted protocol, policies, and provisions specified by Medicare. Coverage is for patients with stage II, III, and IV COPD (moderate to very severe according to the GOLD standards). Pulmonary rehabilitation programs must include five components, and these must be documented in the patient’s medical record. The five components include the following:

According to CMS, claims for Medicare patients should be submitted to Medicare Part A for any component of pulmonary rehabilitation performed during a hospital stay, and claims for rehabilitation components provided on an outpatient basis must be submitted to Medicare Part B. As with other forms of therapy covered by CMS, other insurance providers have already or will follow Medicare policy for reimbursement of pulmonary rehabilitation. This payment mechanism has already undergone changes, and it is anticipated that Medicare will continue to change its reimbursement policy for pulmonary rehabilitation in the future. It is incumbent on clinicians who provide pulmonary rehabilitation to stay abreast of any changes in reimbursement policy and procedure and to make necessary adjustments to receive payment.

At the present time, there is provision to reimburse pulmonary rehabilitation programs for two 1-hour rehabilitation sessions per patient per day up to 36 sessions. An additional 36 sessions over an extended period can be approved by the individual Medicare contractor based on patient need for continued rehabilitation and physician referral. Documentation of programs is essential for payment of services rendered. In 2010, coding for pulmonary rehabilitation under Medicare Part B uses the HCPCS G0424 code. Provision has been made for face-to-face patient sessions and for group (two or more patients) sessions. Individual sessions must be at least 31 minutes in length. If two sessions are performed on the same day, services may be reported only if the duration of the combined treatments is at least 91 minutes. It is essential that the practitioner who conducts pulmonary rehabilitation is familiar with all current practices so that therapy provided and billed for complies with current Medicare policy, is properly documented for each patient, and is submitted in a timely fashion.31,32

Program Results

Patient and program outcomes must be evaluated at the conclusion of the program and periodically thereafter (Box 50-7). Evaluation results must compare patient status before the program with current patient status and may include physiologic, psychologic, and sociologic data. Common outcome measures include exercise tolerance, levels of dyspnea at rest and with exertion, and quality-of-life surveys.

Results of pulmonary rehabilitation must be communicated to the patient, family, referring physician, and home care company, if appropriate. Further goals and objectives for continued improvement may be established to provide the basis for follow-up and reinforcement activities. Quality of life for patients with chronic lung diseases is an outcome measure that many pulmonary rehabilitation programs are documenting.33 A major predictor for improvement in health-related quality of life of a patient with COPD is frequent attendance in a maintenance program.3,34

If no improvements in physical or psychosocial measures occur within a class or group, program deficiencies are the most likely cause. Specifically, insufficient professional training in rehabilitation methods, a lack of uniformity in approach, inadequate program length, and lack of follow-up are the major reasons for unsatisfactory outcomes.

Finally, pulmonary rehabilitation has become recognized as a prerequisite for certain patients with emphysema who are able to undergo lung volume reduction surgery. Physical reconditioning and patient education before the procedure help to increase the chances for a successful outcome. Pulmonary rehabilitation appears to have favorable results with this specific patient population because of added patient and practitioner commitment and focus. Patients who do not complete the presurgical rehabilitation protocol are at higher risk for postsurgical complications.3538

Potential Hazards

Although most patients with COPD can expect to realize benefits through physical reconditioning and pulmonary rehabilitation, certain potential hazards do exist, as follows:

Proper patient selection, education, supervision, and monitoring are key factors in reducing possible hazards.

Mini Clini

What to Expect from Pulmonary Rehabilitation

Solution

It is crucial for all RTs and other caregivers involved in pulmonary rehabilitation to recognize that the focus of any program should attempt to treat the patient as a whole and not solely the underlying disease. A well-constructed pulmonary rehabilitation program should be able both to quantify the extent of physiologic impairment and to assist in establishing outcome expectations for physical reconditioning. Regardless of setting or design, such programs must address the psychologic, social, and vocational impact of the disability on the patient and family and seek ways to improve the patient’s quality of life. In this case, the RT should describe the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation outside the traditional measures of pulmonary function. Although pulmonary rehabilitation cannot affect the progressive deterioration in lung function that occurs with COPD, both education and exercise may improve the patient’s ability to perform activities of daily living and exercise tolerance. In addition, effective breathing techniques may lessen the frequency and severity of “panic breathing” episodes.

Cardiac Rehabilitation

Patients with primary cardiac disease are often referred to cardiac rehabilitation programs where the focus is on improving cardiovascular fitness. Cardiac rehabilitation is defined as a comprehensive exercise and educational program designed for patients with cardiovascular diseases. Similar to pulmonary rehabilitation, good cardiac rehabilitation programs are multidisciplinary in approach and focus. Goals include patient education promoting heart-healthy living, physical reconditioning to improve work capacity, weight loss, and a return to work.

Enrollment in a cardiac rehabilitation program is based on a thorough cardiovascular evaluation and related parameters. The goal of a structured cardiac rehabilitation program is to assist patients in developing a regular pattern of safe exercise to achieve greater cardiovascular performance during activity. Most cardiac rehabilitation programs are conducted within a hospital facility, and the programs are generally divided into monitored and maintenance segments, with home options available. Exercise prescriptions are individualized for participating patients to maximize outcomes and reduce the likelihood of adverse effects.

Pulmonary and cardiac rehabilitation share many similarities and differences. Similarities include the need for patient evaluation before program enrollment, patient education, the focus on exercises to increase fitness and stamina, and the need to monitor patients during exercise and for compliance. Differences include disease focus, patient age (most cardiac patients range in age from late 30s to 60s and 70s, whereas pulmonary patients for the most part are ≥50 years), and exercises used within the program. Many cardiac patients can walk for up to 1 hour, whereas this may be virtually impossible for most pulmonary patients. Breathing exercises to improve ventilation are essential to the pulmonary patient but not that important to cardiac patients.

Reimbursement variables between the two types of programs also exist with cardiac rehabilitation being more recognized by insurance payers, including Medicare. Because cardiac rehabilitation has existed longer than pulmonary rehabilitation and because outcomes tend to have greater validity and acceptance, insurance reimbursement has been more readily available. There are four phases to cardiac rehabilitation from program introduction to the ongoing fitness aspect. Patient reimbursement depends on the phase of cardiac rehabilitation the patient is in. This division into phases does not currently exist for patients in pulmonary rehabilitation.

Finally, respiratory involvement in cardiac rehabilitation is significantly less. For the most part, the RT is involved with instruction on O2 use and may assist with patient exercise sessions during cardiac rehabilitation. Most often, the cardiologist and cardiac nurse specialist are involved with program facilitation and administration. Other health care providers who may be involved include a dietitian; physical therapist, occupational therapist, or both; and psychologist.

Mini Clini

Reacting to Adverse Outcomes

image Problem

A 73-year-old man with stage III COPD was accepted into a pulmonary rehabilitation program. Because of the severity of his disease, his preprogram cardiopulmonary exercise evaluation was stopped after 5 minutes because of excessive dyspnea and oxygen desaturation. He was placed on O2 but was unable to complete the study. However, because of the desire of the patient’s physician to get him into a program of pulmonary rehabilitation and the patient’s desire to participate, the patient was put on home O2 and admitted to the program. While exercising on a treadmill with supplemental O2, the patient complained of headache and nausea. The RT stopped the exercise session and documented a significant increase in the patient’s blood pressure (220/130 mm Hg). How should the RT proceed in this case?

Solution

The RT should document the elevated blood pressure and notify the physician overseeing the pulmonary rehabilitation program and the patient’s prescribing physician (if different) immediately. It is likely that the preprogram cardiopulmonary exercise test was stopped before the excessive increase in blood pressure was noted. While in pulmonary rehabilitation, the patient (on supplemental O2) was able to exercise to a level greater than that during the exercise test. This elevated blood pressure will result in the patient going on some type of antihypertensive therapy and being reevaluated during another exercise test to determine the extent of his hypertensive condition. Depending on the instability of the patient’s hypertension, it is also possible that this patient will be admitted to cardiac rehabilitation first before returning to the pulmonary rehabilitation program. This case shows the importance of a thorough and complete assessment of a patient’s status before any admission to pulmonary rehabilitation.

Conclusion

A properly planned and implemented pulmonary rehabilitation program can produce positive and measurable patient outcomes. Goals and objectives of pulmonary rehabilitation should be written in these measurable terms and explained to the patient in a clear, concise fashion to achieve optimum therapeutic outcomes. The success of pulmonary rehabilitation depends on this along with careful application of current clinical knowledge and the use of a multidisciplinary approach throughout all phases of program organization, implementation, and evaluation. Within this context, pulmonary rehabilitation will continue to gain greater acceptance, and the role of the RT in pulmonary rehabilitation will be increasingly more important.

Summary Checklist

• Pulmonary rehabilitation has two major aims: (1) to control and alleviate disease symptoms and (2) to help patients achieve optimal levels of activity.

• Patients best able to benefit from pulmonary rehabilitation are patients with symptomatic COPD; patients with unstable cardiovascular disorders should be referred for cardiac rehabilitation.

• Effective rehabilitation programming requires a multidisciplinary approach and combines physical reconditioning with education and psychosocial support.

• Rehabilitation does not alter the progressive deterioration in pulmonary function that occurs with chronic lung disease.

• Increased exercise tolerance, decreased intensity of symptoms, and improved activity levels are the best-documented benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation.

• The exercise evaluation provides the basis for the exercise prescription, yields the baseline data needed to assess a patient’s progress, and helps determine the degree of hypoxemia or need for supplemental O2 during exercise.

• Reconditioning should combine lower extremity and upper extremity aerobic exercises with ventilatory muscle training.

• The educational portion of a rehabilitation program should provide patients with knowledge they can use to help cope with their disease and manage symptoms better.

• Decisions regarding facilities, scheduling, class size, and equipment all can affect rehabilitation program outcomes.

• Patient charges should be based on projected costs, as offset by external funding or available insurance reimbursement.

• Cardiac rehabilitation should be considered first if a patient with pulmonary disease also has an underlying cardiac condition that needs to be addressed and appropriately managed.

Share this: