Astrocytic neoplasms
DIFFUSE ASTROCYTIC NEOPLASMS – ASTROCYTOMA, ANAPLASTIC ASTROCYTOMA, GLIOBLASTOMA
GENETICS, MALIGNANT PROGRESSION, AND GRADING OF ASTROCYTIC NEOPLASMS
One important characteristic of the astrocytoma is its propensity for anaplastic transformation; 50–75% (in different series) of diffuse astrocytomas progress to anaplastic astrocytomas or, ultimately, glioblastomas. Time to anaplastic transformation is highly variable, often 3–5 years but occasionally 10 years. Neoplastic progression is associated with the sequential acquisition of multiple genetic abnormalities (Fig. 35.1). The origin of astrocytic neoplasms may include neural stem cells, progenitor cells, or differentiated glial cells. Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1, IDH2) and TP53 gene mutations are considered to be early events in neoplastic progression. In contrast, allelic loss on chromosome 10 occurs predominantly in glioblastomas. Molecular genetic studies have revealed differences between glioblastomas that evolve over years from low grade astrocytomas (secondary) and those that arise de novo (primary) (Table 35.1, Fig. 35.2). In particular, EGFR overexpression is common in primary glioblastoma, while IDH1 mutations are common in secondary glioblastoma. The vast majority of glioblastomas are primary or de novo, rather than secondary in nature. Radiologic images may provide clues to the grade and type of astrocytic neoplasm (Fig. 35.3). Evidence from comprehensive analyses of molecular genetic abnormalities in primary glioblastomas suggests that a defect in at least one of three pathways controlling cell proliferation, survival, and apoptosis is crucial and common to their tumorigenesis (Fig. 35.4), but a majority of these primary glioblastomas show aberrations in all three pathways. More recently, there has been a growing understanding of epigenetic changes that modulate gene expression, but do not alter the DNA sequence itself, and how they can also affect tumor prognosis and response to therapy (Fig. 35.5). In addition, ongoing work suggests that global assessments of RNA transcription patterns can further sub-classify glioblastomas into prognostically significant groups that will likely be important for development of molecular-guided therapies (Table 35.2).
Table 35.1
Genetic characteristics of primary and secondary glioblastoma (GBM)
Primary GBM | Secondary GBM | |
EGFR overexpression | >60% | <10% |
MDM2 overexpression | >50% | <10% |
PTEN gene mutation | >30% | <10% |
TP53 gene mutation present | <10% | >60% |
Loss of chromosome 19q | <10% | >50% |
RB1 promoter hypermethylation | <15% | >40% |
IDH1/IDH2 mutation | <4% | >80% |
35.1 Acquisition of common genetic abnormalities through the range of diffuse astrocytic neoplasms.
IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; PDGFRA, platelet-derived growth factor, receptor A alpha polypeptide; RB1, retinoblastoma 1.
35.2 Genetic pathways to formation of gliomas.
Primary and secondary glioblastomas have different genetic pathways. Pilocytic astrocytomas are genetically distinct from the infiltrating astrocytomas. Oligodendrogliomas share the IDH1 mutation with other low grade astrocytomas but are distinguished by a high frequency of the chromosomes 1p/19q translocation. Chr, chromosome.
35.3 Common radiologic presentations of glial neoplasms.
(a) A low grade astrocytoma (WHO grade II) or other low grade infiltrating glioma often presents as a non-enhancing ill-defined lesion. A minority of non-enhancing tumors may be anaplastic in nature. (b) An enhancing, poorly defined glial neoplasm is most often an anaplastic astrocytoma, other anaplastic glioma, or glioblastoma. (c) A ring-enhancing lesion should prompt strong consideration for a glioblastoma. Abscesses and high grade non-glial malignancies can produce a similar pattern. (d) Astrocytic neoplasms not infrequently enter or cross the corpus callosum sometimes creating a ‘butterfly glioma’ pattern. (e) A cystic mass with an enhancing mural nodule is typical of ganglioglioma and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (often in the temporal lobe) and of hemangioblastoma or pilocytic astrocytoma (often in the cerebellum). (f) While multicentric lesions may reflect metastases, lymphoma, or non-neoplastic lesions, gliomas occasionally can be multifocal as in this example. (g) Diffuse involvement of large areas rather than a distinct mass suggests gliomatosis cerebri. (h) While a solidly enhancing nodular mass may be seen with glioblastoma, a variety of low grade and high grade lesions may show this relatively non-specific pattern. Malignant lymphoma, as in this case, metastatic malignancies, pilocytic astrocytoma, and ganglioglioma may be solidly enhancing and circumscribed as well. (Courtesy of Dr A Lai, UCLA Medical Center, USA.)
35.5 Promoter methylation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT).
(a) Promoter methylation shuts down gene expression of MGMT which is important for DNA repair. (b) Transfer of an alkyl group (CH3) from the O6 position of methylguanine to a cysteine residue on the MGMT protein ‘uses up’ the protein – hence the appellation, ‘suicide enzyme’. The amounts of MGMT protein within a tumor cell are crucial in repairing DNA damage and allowing the cell to avoid a G:C to A:T transition mutation that could result in deleterious or lethal mutations.
Historically, several grading systems have been applied to diffuse astrocytic neoplasms (Table 35.3). These use histologic parameters to separate the range of astrocytic neoplasms into three or four tiers, providing some indication of biologic behavior. Although there are some differences in the applied parameters, there is a broad correspondence between the systems and WHO nomenclature. Use of the WHO nomenclature is preferred (Table 35.4), because ambiguity may occur when the grading system is not specified; for example, the term ‘grade 2’ has different implications for treatment and prognosis in the WHO and Kernohan systems. In addition, there is no evidence to suggest that other grading systems offer any advantage over WHO nomenclature. Various clinical, pathologic, and genetic variables, including histopathologic diagnosis, are prognostic indicators in astrocytic neoplasms (Table 35.5).
Table 35.3
aGrade 1 neoplasms are pilocytic astrocytomas.
bGrade 1 neoplasms include pilocytic astrocytomas.
Table 35.4
WHO grading for diffuse astrocytomas
Astrocytoma WHO grade II | Atypia but no mitosesa |
Anaplastic astrocytoma WHO grade III | Atypia and mitoses |
Glioblastoma WHO grade IV | Atypia, mitoses, vascular proliferationb and/or necrosis |
aA rare mitosis in an otherwise typical low grade astrocytoma does not require elevation to grade III.
bVascular proliferation is defined as ‘endothelial’ proliferation 2 cell layers or more. The term ‘endothelial’ is used loosely as smooth muscle markers are expressed in the hyperplastic vascular wall. This may mimic glomeruli; so-called ‘glomeruloid’ vascular proliferation.
Table 35.5
Prognostic indicators in diffuse astrocytic neoplasms
Age (young age – favorable)
Karnofsky performance score (high score – favorable)
Macroscopic surgical resection (gross resection – favorable)
Histological grade (low WHO grade – favorable)
MGMT methylation status (presence – favorable)
IDH1/IDH2 mutation status (presence – favorable)
Proneural gene expression profile (presence – favorable)
ASTROCYTOMA
Generally, presenting in the third or fourth decade (Table 35.6), diffuse astrocytomas are divided into fibrillary, protoplasmic, and gemistocytic variants. The fibrillary astrocytoma is encountered most frequently. This variant may contain scattered cells with a gemistocytic phenotype, which by convention (WHO classification) constitute >20% of cells in the gemistocytic astrocytoma. The protoplasmic astrocytoma is very rare; some pathologists believe that it is not a distinct variant, but represents a phenotype present in other gliomas.
MACROSCOPIC APPEARANCES
Cerebral astrocytomas diffusely expand the white matter, sometimes distorting the overlying gray matter (Fig. 35.6). Radiologically, low grade astrocytomas are generally non-enhancing (Fig. 35.3a). Cortical or subcortical invasion plus associated edema produce expansion of gyri.
35.6 Astrocytoma.
(a) An astrocytoma diffusely invades the cerebrum producing distortion and expansion of normal structures. The neoplasm produces midline shift and is poorly demarcated. (b) CT scan. A poorly defined mass in the right frontal lobe has lower density than the surrounding cerebrum and has produced midline shift. (Courtesy of Dr J S Millar, Wessex Neurological Center, UK.)
MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCES
Cytologically, neoplastic cells in diffuse astrocytomas show mild atypia, particularly nuclear pleomorphism and hyperchromasia (Fig. 35.7). The cells of fibrillary astrocytomas may appear as bare nuclei, their tenuous fibrillary processes blending with the brain’s parenchyma. Alternatively, they show varying degrees of astrocytic differentiation, exhibiting prominent fibrillary strands of eosinophilic cytoplasm, or a plump cell body in which the nucleus is displaced by homogeneously eosinophilic cytoplasm, the gemistocytic phenotype (Fig. 35.8).
35.7 Fibrillary astrocytoma.
(a) In a smear preparation, the cells show mild nuclear pleomorphism and contain fine fibrillary processes in which glial filaments demonstrate pink metachromasia. (b) The processes show birefringence under polarized light. (c, d) Microcysts disrupt a meshwork of fibrillary processes, which appear relatively condensed around irregularly scattered pleomorphic and hyperchromatic nuclei (e). (f) Neoplastic cells entrap neurons. (g) Immunohistochemistry with a Ki-67 antibody shows a low labeling index.
About a third of cells in gemistocytic astrocytomas show this morphology, though in practice, the boundary between some fibrillary astrocytomas and gemistocytic astrocytomas is hard to delineate. The few short cytoplasmic processes and round nuclei of cells in the protoplasmic astrocytoma produce a truly stellate appearance (Fig. 35.9). Mitotic activity is not found in diffuse astrocytomas; it denotes anaplastic progression (Fig. 35.10