Wound Repair

Published on 10/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1152 times

186 Wound Repair

Acknowledgment and thanks to Dr. E. Parker Hays, Jr., for his work on the first edition.

Within the broad scope of emergency medical treatment, wound repair plays a prominent role. Wounds occur in all types of people—from the youngest toddlers to frail elderly grandparents. In contrast to many other conditions requiring treatment in the emergency department (ED), wounds (typically) occur independently of patients’ other medical issues. However, each patient’s unique substrate for healing is one of the two most significant factors affecting satisfactory wound healing. The second significant consideration is the characteristics of the wound itself.

Epidemiology

Approximately 12 million wounds are treated in EDs in the United States each year.1 Data on the true incidence of wounds are limited because many are thought to be treated away from the ED or urgent care setting. Of individuals with wounds seen in the ED, the majority are men.2 Wounds can clearly occur anywhere on the body, but lacerations on the upper extremities, head, and neck constitute the majority of cases encountered in EDs.

Pathophysiology

Skin, the largest organ in the body, has numerous functions, most prominently heat exchange, prevention of infection, and provision of a tactile interface with the environment. The layers of skin—epidermis, dermis, and connective tissue—all play different roles in wounds and healing. The thickest and most important layer, the dermis, serves as structural integument, supports conveyance of nutritional and waste products, and contains cutaneous nerves (Fig. 186.1).

Disruption of the skin may be caused by an infinite number of means, from simple cutlery accidents to industrial mishaps or intentional violence. Wounds that disrupt the full depth of skin are fundamentally different from those that affect only the superficial layers. Wounds that affect merely the epidermis may typically be cleansed and dressed appropriately with less concern for complications. However, it is imperative to assess seemingly superficial wounds in a diligent manner to ensure that more significant injuries are absent.

After injury, a continuum of coagulation, hemostasis, inflammation, tissue formation, and tissue remodeling quickly ensue. Each of these steps is influenced by the patient’s condition and the clinician’s wound repair skills. Clearly achieving hemostasis is a primary concern for wound repair, both to prevent exsanguination and to allow adequate visualization of the wound, as well as closure of it. Any delay in wound closure allows the later three steps of inflammation, tissue formation, and remodeling to proceed naturally, which will probably result in skin that is functional but scarred.

The aesthetic qualities of a scar are influenced by its thickness, color, and height or degree of depression. Thickness is most dependent on the width of the healing wound and on whether additional granulation tissue is necessary to fill gaps (as in secondary intention). The height of a scar is altered by the alignment and apposition of the healing skin edges, as well as by tensile and shear forces across the wound and the amount of inflammation preceding the formation of scar tissue. The increased height of a hypertrophic scar is the result of redundant tissue. If it extends beyond the original margins of the wound, it is called a keloid. Depressed scars create shadowing (consider the visibility of age-associated wrinkles), which makes them appear darker than the neighboring reflective surfaces. The color of a scar results from its vascularity and pigmentation with respect to surrounding healthy tissue. Melanocytes do not produce pigment at the same rate in injured and healing tissue or in scars as they do in normal tissue.

All these factors in scar formation vary among individuals. Some patients heal very well, whereas hypertrophic keloids invariably develop in others. However, steps to improve outcomes generally remain the same in emergency management.

Differential Diagnosis and Medical Decision Making

Injury to Underlying Structures

When sufficiently breached, skin fails in its protective role and may allow underlying structures to be injured (Fig. 186.2). Diligent assessment of the functionality of surrounding anatomic structures is of utmost importance.

Tendon function should be assessed throughout its range of motion. It may help to ask the patient to estimate the position of a body part at the time of the injury, especially with hand injuries. Tendons may be partially lacerated but their range of motion may remain intact, thereby misleading the practitioner. Patients’ complaints of pain or subjectively decreased range of motion, despite objectively normal findings on examination, should raise suspicion for partial disruption.

Nerves can be injured by the wounding mechanism itself or by iatrogenic maneuvers, especially indiscriminate ones. Clamping, blind probing, and injudicious débridement may all disrupt adjacent nerves. The hands and face are at greatest risk because nerves run in close proximity to the vasculature; zealous attempts to control bleeding vessels can result in damage to adjacent nerves. Injected anesthetics may also injure nerves as a result of pressure necrosis in finite spaces. Examples include injections into the olecranon grooves or foramina in the hard palate of the mouth.

Muscles are highly vascular tissue and are often disrupted with deep wounds. Because muscles are dynamic units, subsequent hematomas, scars, or infection can result in dysfunction. Unnecessary débridement should be avoided and bleeding controlled with direct pressure. Muscle can usually be repaired by securing the surrounding structures, thereby placing the cut surfaces of the muscle in direct apposition. Muscle tissue should be repaired directly only when the foregoing maneuver is insufficient.

Occasionally, a wound is the first sign of an underlying fracture, either because the skin was injured with the force carried onto the bone or because the broken bone edges penetrated the skin from inside.

Treatment

The emergency physician (EP) can close most wounds; some situations requiring specialist consultation are listed in Box 186.2.

Wound Preparation

To meet the goals of reducing risk for infection, minimizing damage to underlying structures, and forming a functional and cosmetically acceptable scar, preparation of the wound can be tantamount to or may surpass closure in importance. An appropriately prepared wound has been anesthetized, has been decontaminated of large particles or foreign bodies, has minimized bacterial counts, and has edges amenable to optimal repair.

Wound Cleansing and Irrigation

The goals of wound cleansing and irrigation are to remove gross contaminants and particulate matter, reduce bacterial counts in the wound, and avoid impeding the host’s responses and natural defenses. In general, ideal wound irrigation requires sufficient pressure and volume while providing drainage and preventing operator exposure. If large particles are present, gross decontamination should be performed before pressure irrigation. A sink, an intravenous infusion set, or holes made in the plastic top of a saline solution bottle can be used to make a spray of water for removing leaves, dirt, and other large contaminants. Following gross decontamination, the pressure of the irrigating stream must be sufficient to overcome the adhesive force of bacteria (5 to 12 psi). Such pressure can be produced with a 35- or 50-mL syringe and a 19-gauge catheter or a commercial device with an integrated splash cup.6 Excessive pressure during irrigation may actually cause additional harm and should be avoided.

The volume of irrigant sufficient to decontaminate wounds is unresolved. However, because bacteria may be present in all sections of a wound, all surfaces of a wound should be exposed to the irrigating stream.

The composition of irrigating fluid has been debated and studied inconclusively, but no significant inferiority has been demonstrated for normal saline. Antiseptics such as povidone-iodine kill bacteria in wounds, but they can also kill fibroblasts and harm normal tissue in the process, particularly if the antiseptics are not diluted to less than the typical 10% preparations. Anecdotally, some clinicians reserve diluted povidone-iodine irrigation for grossly contaminated or high-risk wounds and use saline solution for other wounds, but no conclusive evidence supports this approach.7 At the other end of the spectrum, some studies demonstrate favorable results when irrigation with tap water is used rather than sterile water or saline solution.8 The benefits of using water for irrigation include ease of use and drainage and some modest cost savings. Tap water may be used for irrigation of wounds on body parts well suited to it (e.g., the hand), either alone or as an adjunct to subsequent pressure irrigation, depending on the risks associated with the individual wound and host. In summary, the composition of the fluid is much less important than its mechanical action in decontaminating a wound.

Planning the Repair

The first decision to be made is whether to close a wound primarily. The time elapsed since the injury, the degree of contamination, host factors, and wound factors all play a role in deciding the best option. Primary closure refers to mechanical apposition of the wound edges with subsequent wound healing. Delayed primary closure is the same technique carried out 4 to 5 days after the injury.9 At this point the host’s defenses against infection have been mustered locally, and the risk for subsequent infection with primary closure declines significantly. In secondary closure (secondary intention), gaps between the wound edges become filled with granulation tissue by the body and reepithelialization subsequently occurs.

No well-accepted studies have established firm guidelines for the timing of closure on different portions of the body. Nonetheless, many clinicians agree that certain wounds on the face and head, especially in pediatric patients, have such a low risk for infection that they may be closed after protracted times from injury, including up to 1 to 2 days later. However, wounds of the same size on the hand or forearm of adults probably do have a higher risk for infection after passage of a similar amount of time from injury.10

If the decision is made to close a wound primarily, various options are available. As with almost all decisions in wound management, more than one alternative may be correct, but one option is often best. Methods available for closure include sutures, staples, tissue adhesives, and wound tape or strips.

Wound Closure Techniques

Suture Repair

Sutures offer the most detailed and meticulous closure option, arguably the greatest tensile strength across the wound, and the best choice for certain considerations such as the amount of time that they must remain in the body. However, sutures can be time-consuming to place, require the discomfort of anesthesia, and typically require removal later. Additionally, a suture is a foreign body with attendant risk for infection and inflammation. In particular, EPs should avoid placing deep sutures in a high-risk wound. Monofilament, braided, absorbable, and nonabsorbable sutures also have varying risk for infection, as well as raise other concerns.

Selection of sutures for a wound should be based on size, absorbability, tissue reactivity, risk for infection, and ease of use. In general, nonabsorbable and monofilament sutures are the easiest to use and have the least tissue reactivity and risk for infection. They are best for percutaneous closure. Traditionally, absorbable suture is used for subcutaneous closure. However, some cutaneous closures can be done with absorbable suture, thus obviating the need for removal.11,12

At a minimum, four basic suture patterns should be at the command of EPs: the simple interrupted suture, the corner stitch, and two mattress suture techniques. One should master the simple interrupted pattern first and then move to the others and subsequently to more advanced subcuticular and plastic techniques as required (Fig. 186.3, A and B).

Mattress Sutures

Both horizontal and vertical mattress sutures provide, as a single benefit, better eversion of the wound edges than other sutures do. The horizontal mattress pattern has the additional benefit of some added speed by covering more linear wound length with each knot tie. However, it does result in more pressure on the epidermis by the suture material, which can have cosmetic effects. Horizontal mattress sutures may be useful to evert a problematic section of wound that has a tendency to roll inward. It may then either be replaced with interrupted sutures to hold it in place or be left as is with timely suture removal. Similarly, an isolated vertical mattress suture may be useful to effect better skin eversion (Fig. 186.6).

Tissue Adhesives

Tissue adhesives have been approved for use in the United States since 1998. The majority of products today consist of 2-octylcyanoacrylates. These compounds are similar to cyanoacrylate, commonly known as superglue. Additional modifications to the chemical composition have been made in an effort to reduce tissue reactivity, increase pliability of the finished bond, and make the substance more suitable for use on human skin. Studies have demonstrated antibacterial properties of these products as well.13

These substances were originally thought to replace suture closure in 25% to 32% of wounds, but it is unclear how often they are actually used in lieu of traditional repair. The most common use of tissue adhesives is for low-tension, nongaping wounds on the face, particularly in pediatric patients. Wounds that would otherwise be closed with 5-0 or 6-0 suture may be considered for adhesive repair. Adhesives are also useful for small avulsion injuries with flaps and occlusion over abrasion injuries as a protective barrier. The material is not suitable for use within the wound itself. Tissue adhesives should not be used in areas of high tension (e.g., across joint surfaces) or to close significantly gaping wounds. Aftercare is similar to that for other repair mechanisms, but the tissue adhesive will gradually slough off without assistance.

Puncture Wounds

By their nature, puncture wounds are different from other lacerations in mechanism, risk, and prognosis. No definitive studies exist to guide evaluation, acute management, or risk stratification of puncture wounds. Despite years of publications, the data available are largely retrospective and observational. What is clear is that plantar puncture wounds, in particular, are commonplace and that many patients do not go to the ED for evaluation. One self-reported survey indicated that 44% of persons had experienced a plantar puncture wound at some time during their life. However, perhaps only half of those wounded underwent medical evaluation.14 It has been assumed that puncture wounds may have a higher complication or infection rate than other wounds, but the true incidence is unknown. Wounds on the plantar surface of the foot that become infected may have very serious complications, including osteomyelitis, osteochondritis, and septic arthritis. The bones of the foot are in close proximity to the skin, and the mechanism of injury typically includes significant force of the weight of the body on the penetrating object.

Evaluation of plantar wounds includes the same delineation of host and wound factors as mentioned previously. Additional considerations with puncture wounds include possible penetration of a sock and shoe by a nail or by objects with various degrees of contamination.

Many authors believe that the timing of arrival at the ED also guides initial evaluation and treatment. Patients seen within 24 hours of injury tend to have lower rates of cellulitis at the time of evaluation, but they may also have a greater possibility of useful manipulative intervention. Patients seen after 24 hours may have concerns about infection and may be more likely to require invasive exploration for foreign material in the wound.15 One study indicated that 3% of plantar puncture wounds had a foreign body after initial cleansing without exploration.16

Reasonable recommendations for the management of plantar puncture wounds include consideration of enlargement of the wound and tissue exploration or excision when the puncture wound mechanism is significant. Concerning mechanisms include puncture of protective footwear while wearing socks, wounds in immunocompromised patients, and wounds caused by organic or contaminated objects. In the last instance, thorns, sharp pieces of wood, and other vegetative matter may be more difficult to identify, and these materials carry a higher risk for bacterial infection. It is also reasonable to consider excision of tissue if particulate foreign material is found in the wound. In the instance of thin needles, either hypodermic or sewing, radiography may be useful for identification, but exploration is not typically needed in these patients if no foreign body is identified.

Anesthesia of the sole of the foot is mandatory to allow a good degree of wound care and possible exploration or excision. Ankle blocks are relatively easy to perform, they can provide adequate anesthesia for the plantar surface, and they obviate the need for painful injections into the thick connective tissue of the sole (see Chapter 188).

Patients with overt signs of infection should be assumed to have a foreign body in the wound. A thorough radiographic, ultrasonographic, and local search for foreign bodies should be conducted. In the presence of infection or when the clinician decides to use prophylactic antibiotics, a fluoroquinolone may be the best choice because of improved Pseudomonas coverage.17

Follow-Up, Next Steps in Care, and Patient Education

Too often, aftercare equals afterthought with underemphasis, lack of instruction and documentation, and inadequate knowledge of evidence-based principles. As in other aspects of laceration and wound care, the aims of aftercare are to optimize the chance of a wound healing without infection and with a functional, aesthetically pleasing scar. Generally accepted principles that promote wound healing include maintenance of a clean environment, immobilization, and elevation to reduce edema.

Application of an antibiotic ointment is commonly recommended. Whether the petroleum vehicle promotes a moist environment for reepithelialization or the antibiotics have an actual effect is unclear, but at least one study supports the use of these ointments.18 Immobilization should be considered at least until epithelialization occurs (usually 2 days) or considerably longer in wounds subjected to high tension (e.g., laceration over the kneecap or shin). Optimal times for removal of sutures (for a wound that is not under tension) from various body parts are listed in Table 186.2.

Table 186.2 Optimal Time for Removal of Sutures

LOCATION OPTIMAL TIME FOR REMOVAL
Hands or fingers 7-9 days
Forearms 10-12 days
Feet 10-12 days
Lower extremity 10-12 days
Torso (chest or back) 10-12 days
Scalp 5-7 days
Face 3-5 days

The patient’s scar represents a permanent reminder of the wound, but the medical record is also an enduring account of the events. As a simple guideline with regard to wound documentation, “if you did it or said it, write it” (see the “Documentation” box). Critical elements of record keeping include a description of the mechanism, the patient’s history, and previous home care of the wound; documentation of the function of surrounding structures before and after any medical maneuvers; and description of the steps taken to reduce infection, search for foreign bodies, and close the wound. Furthermore, the instructions given to patients need to include precautions for return, signs of infection, and step-by-step short- and longer-term instructions for aftercare of the wound. Pitfalls in documentation are inadequately addressing the search for a foreign body, irrigation, and assessment of surrounding function, as well as failure to describe the wound’s length and complexity.19

image Documentation

Wound Repair

Patient Teaching

Patients frequently ask, “Will there be a scar?” The inevitable and appropriate answer is yes. However, scars can be minimized by recognition of the aforementioned factors. Patients can serve as their own case controls; earlier scars give clues to how an acute wound may heal. Beyond the initial wound aftercare outlined previously, patients who have a tendency to form hypertrophic or keloid scars should be identified by the EP and informed of treatment options available to decrease the size of the scar. Although many methods have been studied, the only treatments with sufficient prospective data to support their use are silicone gel sheets and intralesional corticosteroid injections.20,21 Additionally, pressure or paper taping and massage over developing scars are simple measures that may be initiated soon after initial wound healing. Sunscreen use is important during the first 6 months to 1 year. Certain topical preparations have been promoted to improve scars aesthetically. Vitamin E cream is popular and available over the counter, but no well-conducted study exists to show its effectiveness for acute lacerations, and at least one study has shown a detrimental effect.22 An onion extract (Mederma) is promoted as a way to make scars “appear” softer and smoother. One prospective study is cited in the company’s literature, but no large studies have yet been published to support its use.23

Aftercare of wounds is largely directed and conducted by patients themselves. Consequently, patients need a thorough list of return precautions, including signs of infection: increased redness, pus from the wound, more swelling than they think is appropriate, and excessive pain. Any of these situations should be reason to return to the ED.

In addition, a persistent foreign body sensation may represent just that, and the patient should return for further evaluation. Some EDs perform a routine wound check at 48 hours, although for uncomplicated wounds in an informed patient, this approach is not necessary. The timing of suture removal and sun avoidance or the use of sunscreen should be discussed in relation to aftercare. A preprinted sheet detailing “if-then” scenarios and expected occurrences is useful. Because many wounds are treated at home, information on what types of wounds require evaluation in the ED in the future may result in better prehospital home care and more effective use of ED resources.

References

1 Singer AJ, Hollander JE, Quinn JV. Evaluation and management of traumatic lacerations. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1142–1148.

2 Capellan O, Hollander J. Management of lacerations in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2003;21:205–231.

3 Cardanay C, Rodehaver G, Thacker J, et al. The crush injury: a high risk wound. JACEP. 1976;5:965–970.

4 Martra AK, Adams JC. Use of surgical gloves in the management of sutured hand wounds in the A&E department. Injury. 1986;17:193–195.

5 Denkler K. A comprehensive review of epinephrine in the finger: to do or not to do. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:114–124.

6 Singer AJ, Hollander JE, Subramanian S, et al. Pressure dynamics of various irrigation techniques commonly used in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;24:36–40.

7 Dire DJ, Welsh AP. A comparison of wound irrigation solutions used in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19:704–708.

8 Fernandez R, Griffiths R, Ussia C. Water for wound cleansing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 4, 2002. CD003861

9 Dimick AR. Delayed wound closure: indications and techniques. Ann Emerg Med. 1988;17:1303–1304.

10 Morgan MJ, Hutchison D, Johnson HM. The delayed treatment of wounds of the hand and forearm under antibiotic cover. Br J Surg. 1980;67:140–141.

11 Holger JS, Wandersee SC, Hale DB. Cosmetic outcomes of facial lacerations repaired with tissue adhesive, absorbable, and nonabsorbable sutures. Am J Emerg Med. 2004;22:254–257.

12 Karounis HG. Plain gut vs. non-absorbable nylon sutures in traumatic pediatric lacerations: long-term. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:448.

13 Quinn JV, Maw JL, Ramotar K, et al. Octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive wound repair versus suture repair in a contaminated wound model. Surgery. 1997;122:69–72.

14 Weber EJ. Plantar puncture wounds: a survey to determine the incidence of infections. J Accid Emerg Med. 1996;13:274–277.

15 Chisholm CD, Schlesser JF. Plantar puncture wounds: controversies and treatment recommendations. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18:1352–1357.

16 Schwab RA, Powers RD. Conservative therapy of plantar puncture wounds. J Emerg Med. 1995;13:291–295.

17 Raz R, Miron D. Oral ciprofloxacin for treatment of infection following nail puncture wounds of the foot. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;21:194–195.

18 Dire DJ, Coppola M, Dwyer DA, et al. Prospective evaluation of topical antibiotics for preventing infections in uncomplicated soft-tissue wounds repaired in the ED. Acad Emerg Med. 1995;2:4–10.

19 Sullivan DJ. Wound care: retained foreign bodies and missed tendon injuries. ED Legal Lett. 1998;9:45–49.

20 Ahn ST, Monafo WW, Mustoe TA. Topical silicone gel: a new treatment for hypertrophic scars. Surgery. 1989;106:781–786.

21 Mustoe TA, Cooter RD, Gold MH, et al. International Advisory Panel on Scar Management, 2002: international clinical recommendations on scar management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:560–571.

22 Baumann LS, Spencer J. The effects of topical vitamin E on the cosmetic appearance of scars. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:311–315.

23 Chung VQ, Kelley L, Marra D, et al. Onion extract gel versus petrolatum emollient on new surgical scars: prospective double-blinded study. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:193–197.