Warming devices

Published on 27/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2600 times

Chapter 30 Warming devices

Background

Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia (IPH), defined as core body temperature ≤36.0°C, is a common consequence of anaesthesia. It has a number of adverse effects, including greater intraoperative blood loss and consequent blood transfusion,1 an increased rate of wound infection,2 morbid cardiac events3 and pressure sores,4 as well as a longer stay in both recovery and hospital.5 It also causes subjective discomfort.

Maintaining normothermia perioperatively can reduce the incidence of these adverse effects. There are a number of devices that can be used to this end. They may be devices that attempt to conserve the patient’s own heat (passive) or devices that transfer heat from an external source to the patient (active). The latter may warm the patient externally or via warmed intravenous and irrigation fluids.

In 2008, the United Kingdom’s National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) produced the ‘Management of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia in adults’ guideline.6 Its strength is in the fact that it is a clear endorsement of the clinical and cost benefits of perioperative warming, but its weakness is that it does not cover the full range of technology available due to a sparse research base.

The recommendations can be succinctly summarized as:

should receive warming. In addition, all fluid infusions of 500 ml or more should be warmed.7,8 Together, these recommendations, therefore, encompass the majority of operations and most intravenous infusions, and highlight the need for a wide knowledge of the available warming technologies.

Temperature monitoring is covered elsewhere in this book. However, it should not be forgotten that this is an integral part of perioperative thermal management. Unfortunately, there are limitations to all currently available methods of perioperative temperature monitoring and it should be remembered that accuracy in the laboratory does not necessarily imply accuracy in the clinical setting.

Physical principles

These are important in understanding how warming devices work, how heat is lost and gained by the body, how warming devices work and, consequently, the best way to go about maintaining normothermia.

Heat transfer

Heat transfer can only take place down a temperature gradient. Within the body there is a gradient between core and peripheral ‘compartments’. Peripheral tissues are usually 2– 4°C cooler than the core. There is then the much more variable gradient between the peripheral tissues and the environment. This simplistic model is, however, somewhat modified by the body’s control over heat distribution via the circulation. The importance of this is demonstrated by the fact that even during warming, the peripheral compartment remains about 1°C less than the core temperature.

Devices used to prevent perioperative hypothermia

Active devices

Circulating water devices

Initially, prior to the advent of forced-air warming, patients were placed on circulating hot water mattresses in an attempt to counteract heat loss and maintain normothermia. In theory the high specific heat capacity of water in the mattress should be very effective at providing heat. In practice, however, these devices only effectively deliver heat to those areas in direct contact with the mattress, which constitutes a relatively small proportion of the body. Furthermore, those small areas in direct contact are under pressure and so have a compromised blood supply that reduces the amount of heat transfer even further. Additionally, in this situation the relatively high thermal capacity of the water is a disadvantage as it increases the likelihood of thermal damage, which has been described at settings of 39°C.

Newer devices overcome these problems by circulating the water through special garments or pads. They include the Kimberly-Clark Patient Warming System (Figs 30.1A and B), which uses adhesive ‘energy transfer’ pads with micro-channels for circulating water that can be applied to the back, thighs, chest, or any combination of the three, depending on the site of surgery. Another modern system is the Allon circulating-water garment. This conductive heating garment is divided into separate segments for arms and thighs, which allows clinicians to cover different body surfaces depending on the site of surgery. Perhaps unsurprisingly, given the different thermal characteristics of water and air, both the above have both been shown to be more efficient at warming volunteers than forced-air devices (see below).

Carbon fibre and polymer devices

Carbon fibre heating mattresses consist of electrically conductive bundles of this material that criss-cross the device in much the same way as the wire element in electric blankets. When an electric current is passed through the device the resistance of the material causes the mattress to heat up. However, the biggest problem with these is that it is difficult for such systems to deliver uniform heating characteristics, with the consequent risk of burns to a patient. This is because the area of heating surface may be inadequate and the hardness of the bundles means that these require some form of pressure relief material on top which attenuates the warming performance.

In contrast to carbon fibre, carbon polymer theoretically benefits from a higher thermal transfer capacity, more uniform heating characteristics and better elasticity (see below).

The heat generated in the polymer is caused by excitation of the carbon atoms within the polymer due to the passage of an electric current. This is produced by a low-voltage source applied across the edges of the sheet. The polymer increases the electrical resistance by holding the pattern of the carbon particles. The variation in temperature across a sheet the size of an operating table is less than 1°C, thereby delivering heat in a uniform manner over a large surface area. The properties of the polymer also allow a viscoelastic foam to be placed under the warming surface which provides pressure relief superior to a standard operating table mattress or gel pad. The moulding of the foam improves the efficiency of the mattress as the heat is transferred through conduction rather than convection. It also prevents one of the problems with other warming mattresses in that there is less pressure to occlude the skin circulation, which in turn reduces the incidence of thermal damage and pressure sores.

A full-length mattress takes approximately 65W at full power (i.e. during warming up phase). The power needed to maintain temperature varies depending on patient characteristics and ambient conditions. A thermistor on the rear face of the polymer sheet is connected to a microprocessor control unit that regulates the power to the mattress to maintain the selected temperature. This can usually be set at between 37 and 40°C.

The working components are encapsulated in a latex-free cover, with welded seams, which means that the mattress can be cleaned in the same way as an operating table (Fig. 30.2).

image

Figure 30.2 Inditherm carbon polymer warming mattress.

Image courtesy of Inditherm Medical.

The logistical advantages of carbon technologies include that the warming area can be maintained largely irrespective of the surgical access required and the operating theatre is quieter due to the absence of circulating air and complaints from the surgical staff that they are too warm. On the other hand, in circumstances where there is reduced patient contact with the mattress (e.g. lithotomy position) equivalence with the variety of shaped (’specialist’) forced-air warming blankets has yet to be established. Recent advances incorporating carbon polymer into blankets may serve to overcome problems of inadequate mattress contact area.

Forced-air warming blankets

These have revolutionized patient warming. Broadly speaking a large volume of air is blown over a 450–1400 W electrical element which warms it to 35–46°C. This is then passed through a ‘quilted’ blanket that covers the patient (Fig. 30.3). The power consumption is around 850 W for the lower powered devices and up to 1500 W for the more powerful ones (i.e. a factor of 10–20 greater than the carbon polymer mattresses). There is a significant variability in the performance of the different types of forced air heating devices (Table 30.1).

Various different blankets have been developed in order to maximize the surface area covered during different surgical procedures and exposures; including now forced warm air mattresses for positioning underneath the patient. With improving technology, the heating devices themselves can be much smaller and so it has been possible to develop special jackets with portable heaters that can be used to keep patients warm throughout the perioperative period.

There are both disposable and reusable products. What is gained in terms of reduced consumables with the latter may be partly lost by the environmental and financial costs of laundering.

Of the single-use types, there are two versions which differ in that one is a closed system whereas the other forces air out through small holes on the side of the blanket facing the patient. There is the unproven possibility that the latter may introduce pathogens into the surgical field. They both have filters on the air intake; although these are not small enough to exclude all pathogens that may also exist on and within the warming unit, there is nothing in the NICE literature review to suggest an increase in infection rates.

Radiant heaters

Radiant heaters are electric heaters that generate heat using infrared radiation in the same way that the sun heats the Earth (Fig. 30.4). The infrared spectrum has a wavelength of 0.7–10 µm. Non-industrial heaters use the medium part of the spectrum (approx. 1.5–5.6 µm), typically utilizing the range 2–4 µm. Radiant heat transfer, unlike conduction and convection, requires no intermediate conductor or convector, as infrared energy, like light, passes directly from the source to the receiver. The rate of heat transfer depends on the emissivity of the source, the absorptivity of the receiver, the difference between their absolute temperatures (raised to the fourth power), and the distance between them.

The element on a typical neonatal unit typically consumes 600 W power. They can either generate heat to a set air temperature or, via a feedback mechanism, to a set skin temperature. The danger with the latter is that if the sensor falls off it will read air temperature, which will run the risk of overheating of the patient.

Radiant heaters have the advantage that they provide efficient, uniform and immediate heat, and they are unaffected by air currents, such as those in laminar flow operating theatres. In addition, they do not generate air-currents, which might facilitate the spread of pathogens.

The disadvantages are that they warm the operating staff even more than forced-air warmers, that they may be impractical for patients much larger than 8 kg and that they will only warm exposed surfaces (which can increase evaporative losses). Thus, their use is largely restricted to paediatrics.

Devices used to warm intravenous fluids

NICE (2008, see above) in the UK has identified the risk of infusion of cold intravenous fluids as a potential cause of IPH and has issued guidance on the warming of volumes of 500 ml or more in adults. Extrapolating from the thermal capacities of water and body tissues, the infusion of 1 L of fluid intravenously at room temperature will theoretically lead to a decrease in core temperature of >0.2°C in a 70 kg person.

Fluid warmers can be broadly classified into forced air, metal plate, circulating water and infrared devices. There are also high-flow and low-flow versions with large variations in performance especially at higher flow rates (Tables 30.2 and 30.3).

Forced-air/coil warmers

As can be seen from the entry for the Baire Hugger (Fig. 30.6) device in Table 30.2, these are the least effective and consist simply of a coil placed inside the hose of a forced air warming mattress. Their poor performance can be explained by the different thermal capacities of air and water (see above). In this case air, which has a low capacity, is being used to heat fluid which has a high capacity.

High-flow fluid warmers

Devices designed for infusing fluids at high flow rates require both lower resistance ‘cartridges’ and some form of pressurization.

The ‘Level One’ (Fig. 30.9) system from Smiths Medical uses heated water at 42°C and an aluminium counter current heat exchanger to deliver flow rates up to a claimed 1400 ml min−1. Two rigid housings for the bags of infusate are pressurised to 300 mmHg by an in built compressor to deliver an uninterrupted flow. The maximum effective flow rate for fluids at 10°C is approximately half of that for fluids stored at 20°C. These devices have been inadvertently charged with bags partly containing air and have delivered fatal air emboli into patients. Although newer versions have an air detector, this can be bypassed. There is also an upgrade available for the older machines, but the risk of air embolus remains significant with any system that uses a pressurised infusion bag.

image

Figure 30.9 Level 1, high flow fluid warming system.

Image courtesy of Smiths Medical, UK.

The Fluido infra red warmer (see above) can also be used as a high flow device. The casette can be fitted with two infusion lines that are inserted into IV fluid bags pressurised by pneumatic chambers fed by a compressor. The AirGuard component (Fig. 30.10) protects against air embolism. If the fluid in the chamber falls below a fixed level a valve will close the supply tubing, to prevent the infusion of air. In addition, an infrared tube sensor continuously monitors the presence of this tubing to ensure that it is fixed correctly into the shut-off valve. The complete system is mounted on a drip stand (Fig. 30.11).

image

Figure 30.11 Fluido High flow system.

Image courtesy of TSCI International BV.

References

1 Rajagopalan S, Mascha E, Na J, Sessler DI. The Effects of Mild Perioperative Hypothermia on Blood Loss and Transfusion Requirement. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(1):71–77.

2 Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. N Engl J Med. 1996 May 9;334(19):1209–1215.

3 Frank SM, Fleisher LA, Breslow MJ, Higgins MS, Olson KF, Kelly S, et al. Perioperative maintenance of normothermia reduces the incidence of morbid cardiac events. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 1997;277(14):1127–1134. 1997 April 9

4 Scott EM, Leaper DJ, Clark M, Kelly PJ. Effects of warming therapy on pressure ulcers–a randomized trial. AORN J. 2001 May;73(5):921–927. 9–33, 36–8

5 Lenhardt R, Marker E, Goll V, Tschernich H, Kurz A, Sessler DI, et al. Mild intraoperative hypothermia prolongs postanesthetic recovery. Anesthesiology. 1997 Dec;87(6):1318–1323.

6 NICE. Perioperative hypothermia (inadvertent): The management of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia in adults. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2008. Contract No.: Document Number

7 Camus Y, Delva E, Cohen S, Lienhart A. The effects of warming intravenous fluids on intraoperative hypothermia and postoperative shivering during prolonged abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996 Aug;40(7):779–782.

8 Gelman S. Venous Function and Central Venous Pressure: A Physiologic Story. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(4):735–748.

9 Bräuer A, English MJ, Steinmetz N, Lorenz N, Perl T, Weyland W, Quintel M. Efficacy of forced-air warming systems with full body blankets. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54(1):34–41.

10 Rein EB, Filtvedt M, Walloe L, Raeder JC. Hypothermia during laparotomy can be prevented by locally applied warm water and pulsating negative pressure. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Mar;98(3):331–336.

11 Turner M, Hodzovic I, Mapleson WW. Simulated clinical evaluation of four fluid warming devices. Anaesthesia. 2006;61(6):571–575.