Variants of Preexcitation

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 5 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 3230 times

Chapter 19 Variants of Preexcitation

Variants of Preexcitation (Atypical Bypass Tracts)

A working definition of an atypical bypass tract (BT) is a conduction pathway that bypasses all or part of the normal conduction system but is not a rapidly conducting pathway connecting atrium and ventricle near the mitral or tricuspid annulus. Thus, pathways that connect the atrium to the His bundle (HB), the atrioventricular node (AVN) to the His-Purkinje system (HPS) or the ventricle, or the HPS to the ventricle fit into this designation (Fig. 19-1).

“Mahaim Fibers”

In 1937, during pathological examination of the heart, Mahaim and Benatt identified islands of conducting tissue extending from the HB into the ventricular myocardium. These fibers were called Mahaim fibers or fasciculoventricular fibers.13 This description was subsequently expanded to include connections between the AVN and the ventricular myocardium (nodoventricular fibers). Later, it was recognized that BTs could arise from the AVN and insert into the right bundle branch (RB; nodofascicular fibers).2,3 This classification for Mahaim fibers persisted until evidence suggested that the anatomical substrate of tachycardias with characteristics previously attributed to nodoventricular and nodofascicular fibers is actually atrioventricular (AV) and atriofascicular BTs with decremental conduction properties (i.e., conduction slows at faster heart rates) (see Fig. 19-1). Although these BTs are sometimes collectively referred to as “Mahaim fibers,” the use of this term is discouraged because it is more illuminating to name the precise BT according to its connections. In this chapter, these BTs are referred to as atypical BTs to differentiate them from the more common (typical) rapidly conducting AV BTs that result in the Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome.4

Types of Atypical Bypass Tracts

Long Decrementally Conducting Atrioventricular and Atriofascicular Bypass Tracts

These BTs comprise the majority (80%) of atypical BTs; their atrial insertion site is in the right atrial (RA) free wall.6,7 These BTs tend (84%) to cross the tricuspid annulus in the lateral, anterolateral, or anterior region. They extend along the right ventricular (RV) free wall to the region where the moderator band usually inserts at the apical third of the RV free wall, inserting into the distal part of the RB (atriofascicular BT) or into the ventricular myocardium close to the RB (long decrementally conducting AV BT). These BTs are functionally similar to the normal AV junction, with an AVN-like structure leading to a His bundle (HB)–like structure. In essence, those BTs function as an auxiliary conduction system parallel to the normal conduction system (AVN–HPS). Similar to the normal AVN, these BTs demonstrate decremental conduction (related to the slow rate of recovery of excitability) and Wenckebach-type block in response to rapid atrial pacing and are sensitive to adenosine. The conduction delay in these BTs has been localized to the intraatrial portion of the BT (the AVN-like portion), whereas the interval from the inscription of the BT potential at the tricuspid annulus and the onset of ventricular activation (BT-V interval) remains constant.46,8,9

Short Decrementally Conducting Atrioventricular Bypass Tracts

These BTs are analogous to decrementally conducting concealed BTs responsible for the permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia (PJRT; see Chap. 18) in that they bridge the AV rings and insert proximally into ventricular myocardium in close proximity to the AV annulus.7,10 These BTs primarily arise from the RA free wall, but can also arise from the posterior or septal region. Left-sided BTs with decremental conduction characteristics have rarely been described. Although these BTs demonstrate decremental conduction and Wenckebach-type block in response to rapid atrial pacing, they do not consistently appear to be responsive to adenosine, which suggests that their structure is not composed of AVN-like tissue.10

Nodoventricular and Nodofascicular Bypass Tracts

Nodoventricular BTs arise in the normal AVN and insert into ventricular myocardium near the AV junction.7 Nodofascicular BTs arise in the normal AVN and insert into the RB. These BTs are sensitive to adenosine, probably because of their AVN connection.5

Arrhythmias Associated with Atypical Bypass Tracts

Atypical BTs in patients with clinical arrhythmias have the following characteristics: (1) unidirectional (anterograde-only) conduction (with rare exceptions); (2) long conduction times; and (3) decremental conduction (i.e., cycle length [CL]-dependent slowing of conduction).

Atypical BTs comprise 3% to 5% of all BTs. The incidence is slightly higher (6%) in patients presenting with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with a left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology.7 Multiple BTs occur in 10% of patients with atypical BTs. In some cases, a typical, rapidly conducting AV BT can mask the presence of an atypical BT, which only becomes apparent after ablation of the typical BT. Dual AVN pathways or multiple BTs occur in 40% of patients with atypical BTs. Atypical BTs can also be associated with Ebstein anomaly.

Electrocardiographic Features

Normal Sinus Rhythm

During normal sinus rhythm (NSR), the ECG shows normal QRS or minimal preexcitation in most patients with atypical BTs. Subtle preexcitation can be suspected by the absence of the normal septal forces (small q waves) in leads I, aVL, V5, and V6 and the presence of an rS complex in lead III in the setting of a narrow QRS.12 The degree of preexcitation depends on the relative conduction time over the AVN and BT. Maneuvers that prolong conduction over the AVN (e.g., atrial pacing, vagal maneuvers, or drugs) to a greater degree than BT conduction will increase the degree of preexcitation. Because atypical BTs exhibit decremental conduction, increasing the atrial pacing rate results in prolongation of the P-delta interval. In contrast, in the setting of typical rapidly conducting AV BTs, the P-delta interval remains relatively constant regardless of the degree of preexcitation; whereas prolonging the AVN conduction time results in more preexcitation. The P-delta interval remains constant or exhibits mild prolongation because conduction over the typical BT displays less decrement than does the AVN.5,7,1214

Electrophysiological Testing

Baseline Observations During Normal Sinus Rhythm

In the baseline state, minimal or no preexcitation can be present; thus, the His bundle–ventricular (HV) interval is normal or slightly short.

Atrial Pacing and Atrial Extrastimulation during Normal Sinus Rhythm

Progressively shorter atrial pacing CLs or atrial extrastimulus (AES) coupling intervals produce decremental conduction in both the atypical BT and, to a greater degree, the AVN (Fig. 19-3).12 Consequently, the atrial–His bundle (AH) interval increases, the QRS morphology gradually shifts to a more preexcited LBBB morphology, and the AV (A-delta) interval increases. However, the AV (A-delta) interval increases to a lesser degree than the AH interval. This is in contrast to the setting of typical rapidly conducting AV BTs, in which the AV (A-delta) interval remains constant despite prolongation of the AH interval and exaggeration of the degree of preexcitation, because the A-delta interval represents conduction time over the BT. Typical AV BTs maintain constant conduction time during different pacing rates and AES coupling intervals—that is, nondecremental conduction.5

image

FIGURE 19-3 Effect of atrial extrastimulation (AES) on preexcitation via a long atrioventricular (AV) bypass tract (BT). No preexcitation is observed during normal sinus rhythm and during the pacing drive at a cycle length of 600 milliseconds (normal PR and His bundle–ventricular [HV] intervals). A, AES produces decremental conduction in the atrioventricular node (AVN) with prolongation of the atrial–His bundle (AH) interval (from 60 to 100 milliseconds), associated with manifest preexcitation and shortening of the HV interval (from 49 to 22 milliseconds). B and C, Progressively shorter AES coupling intervals produce decremental conduction in the BT and, to a greater degree, in the AVN. Consequently, the AH interval prolongs, the QRS morphology gradually shifts to a more preexcited left bundle branch block morphology, and the AV (P-delta) interval prolongs. However, the P-delta interval prolongs to a lesser degree than the AH interval. The HV interval decreases (becomes negative) but remains fixed (B and C) although the P-delta interval continues to prolong with more premature AES because of decremental conduction over the BT. The fixed ventricular–His bundle (VH) interval, despite shorter AES coupling intervals, suggests that the BT inserts into or near the distal right bundle branch (RB) at the anterior free wall of the right ventricle, with retrograde conduction to the His bundle (HB). However, because the VH interval is modestly long (40 milliseconds), a long decrementally conducting AV BT inserting into the ventricle close to the RB is more likely than an atriofascicular BT. C, AV reentrant echo complex (red arrows) secondary to anterograde conduction over the BT and retrograde conduction over the AVN.

With progressively shorter atrial pacing CLs or AES coupling intervals, the HV interval decreases as the His potential becomes progressively inscribed into the QRS (usually within the first 5 to 25 milliseconds after the onset of the QRS). The His potential eventually becomes activated retrogradely as the wavefront travels anterogradely down the BT and then retrogradely up the RB to the HB (see Fig. 19-3). When the His potential is lost within the QRS, it is unclear whether anterograde AV conduction continues to propagate over the HB or block has occurred.7

At the point of maximal preexcitation, the AV (A-delta) interval continues to prolong with more rapid pacing because of the decremental conduction properties of the BT, and the His potential–QRS relationship remains unaltered because the HB is activated retrogradely until block in the BT occurs. The fixed ventricular–His bundle (VH) interval, despite shorter pacing CLs or AES coupling intervals, suggests that the BT inserts into or near the distal RB at the anterior free wall of the RV with retrograde conduction to the HB. Whenever the VH interval is less than 20 milliseconds, insertion into the RB (i.e., atriofascicular or nodofascicular BT) is likely. On the other hand, with long decrementally conducting AV BTs, which insert into the ventricular myocardium close to the RB, the VH interval approximates the HV interval minus the duration of the His potential (because the His potential is activated retrogradely).5,7

For short decrementally conducting BTs, the HB is activated anterogradely, and retrograde conduction to the HB is only seen following AV block or during antidromic AVRT. Decremental conduction (progressive prolongation of the AV interval) and Wenckebach-type block develop in the BT. The conduction delay in these BTs is localized to the intraatrial portion of the BT; the interval from the inscription of the BT potential at the tricuspid annulus to the onset of ventricular activation (BT-V interval) remains constant.5

Dual AVN physiology is common in patients with atypical BTs. Sometimes, during AES, a jump from the fast to the slow AVN pathway prolongs the AH interval to a degree sufficient to unmask preexcitation over the BT, at which time the His potential becomes inscribed within the QRS.

The site of the earliest ventricular activation during preexcitation is at the RV apex for long, decrementally conducting AV BTs and atriofascicular BTs, but adjacent to the annulus near the base of the RV for short, decrementally conducting AV BTs.

The site of atrial stimulation does not influence the degree of preexcitation in the setting of nodofascicular and nodoventricular BTs. Contrariwise, preexcitation becomes more prominent when atrial stimulation is performed closer to the atrial insertion site of AV or atriofascicular BTs.

Induction of Tachycardia

Initiation by Atrial Extrastimulation or Atrial Pacing

Initiation of antidromic AVRT by an AES requires the following: (1) intact anterograde conduction over the BT; (2) anterograde block in the AVN or HPS; and (3) intact retrograde conduction over the HPS-AVN once the AVN resumes excitability following partial anterograde penetration. Whereas the latter is usually the limiting factor for the initiation of antidromic AVRT using typical rapidly conducting AV BTs, it is readily available in the setting of atypical BTs. This is because of the slow decremental conduction anterogradely over the atypical BT, providing adequate delay for full recovery of the HPS-AVN.

As noted, progressively shorter atrial pacing CLs (especially from the RA) result in progressive AV (A-delta) interval prolongation and a greater degree of preexcitation until maximal. Often, once maximal preexcitation has been achieved, cessation of pacing is followed by preexcited SVT. Progressively shorter AES coupling intervals similarly result in progressive AV (A-delta) interval prolongation and a greater degree of preexcitation until maximal. When anterograde AVN conduction fails but conduction persists over the BT, the HPS-AVN can be activated retrogradely to initiate antidromic AVRT.7

The sudden appearance of preexcitation associated with a “jump” from the fast to the slow AVN pathway with a His potential inscribed before ventricular activation or with a VH interval of less than 10 milliseconds strongly favors AVNRT. Although a slowly conducting atriofascicular BT that becomes manifest with a jump to the slow AVN pathway cannot be excluded, a consistent pattern of dual pathway dependence and an HV relationship too short to be retrograde from the distal RB would be unlikely.7 Induction of AVNRT with AES is almost always associated with a dual pathway response, which may not be seen if the impulse conducts anterogradely over the BT and captures the HB before it is activated by the impulse traversing the slow AVN pathway anterogradely. In other cases, a jump can be seen so that the anterograde His potential follows the QRS with a typical AVN echo to initiate SVT, analogous to 1:2 conduction initiating antidromic AVRT.

Initiation by Ventricular Extrastimulation or Ventricular Pacing

Initiation of antidromic AVRT by ventricular pacing or VES requires the following: (1) retrograde block in the BT, which is almost always available, because the atypical BTs are usually unidirectional (anterograde only); (2) retrograde conduction over the HPS-AVN; and (3) adequate VA delay to allow for recovery of the atrium and BT so it can support subsequent anterograde conduction.

Ventricular pacing can initiate SVT in 85% of cases. Initiation is almost always associated with retrograde conduction up a relatively fast AVN pathway, followed by anterograde conduction down a slow pathway, which is associated with preexcitation. The anterograde slow pathway can be a BT (i.e., antidromic AVRT) or a slow AVN pathway (i.e., AVNRT with an innocent bystander BT). During induction of the SVT by ventricular pacing at a CL similar to the tachycardia CL or by a VES that advances the His potential by a coupling interval similar to the H-H interval during the SVT, the His bundle–atrial (HA) interval following the ventricular stimulus is compared with that during the SVT—an HA interval that is longer with ventricular pacing or VES initiating the SVT than that during the SVT suggests AVNRT. This occurs despite the fact that the H-H interval of the VES (i.e., the interval between the His potential activated anterogradely by the last sinus beat to the His potential activated retrogradely by the VES initiating the SVT) exceeds the H-H interval during the SVT. Because the AVN usually exhibits greater decremental conduction with repetitive engagement of impulses than in response to a single impulse at a similar coupling interval, the more prolonged the HA with the initiating ventricular stimulus, the more likely the SVT is AVNRT. If the SVT uses the BT for anterograde conduction, the HA interval during ventricular pacing or the VES initiating the SVT, at a comparable coupling interval as the tachycardia CL, should have the same HA interval as during the SVT.

Tachycardia Features

Antidromic Atrioventricular Reentrant Tachycardia Using an Atypical Bypass Tract Anterogradely

Ventricular–His Bundle Interval

For atriofascicular and nodofascicular BTs, the VH interval is short (16 ± 5 milliseconds), much shorter than the nonpreexcited HV interval and also shorter than the VH interval during ventricular pacing, because the BT inserts into the RB, hence, the HB and ventricle are activated in parallel, not in sequence. Conduction time to the distal RB is short (V-RB = 3 ± 5 milliseconds).13 For long decrementally conducting AV BTs, the VH interval is short (37 ± 9 milliseconds) but longer than that of atriofascicular BTs because the ventricle and HB are activated in sequence, not in parallel. However, the VH interval is still shorter than the nonpreexcited HV interval. In this setting, the VH interval approximates the HV interval minus the duration of the His potential, because the BT inserts close to the RB and the His potential is activated retrogradely. In the presence of long decrementally conducting AV BTs, conduction time to the distal RB (V-RB = 25 ± 6 milliseconds) is longer than that for atriofascicular BTs. During antidromic AVRT using a nodoventricular or a short decrementally conducting AV BT, intermediate VH intervals are observed, whereby the His potential is inscribed within the QRS. The VH interval during the AVRT is longer than the nonpreexcited HV interval and than the VH interval during RV apical pacing, exceeding it by the time it takes the impulse to travel from the ventricular insertion site of the BT at the RV base to the distal RB (i.e., because of the long V-RB interval).7,13 When antidromic AVRT occurs in the presence of retrograde right bundle branch block (RBBB), the VH interval is long (the His potential is inscribed after the QRS and the VH interval is longer than the nonpreexcited HV interval). Retrograde block over the RB results in anterograde conduction over the distal RB (in the setting of atriofascicular BTs) or RV and transseptal impulse propagation with subsequent retrograde conduction over the left bundle branch (LB) into the HB and AVN. This results in an antidromic AVRT with a macroreentrant circuit incorporating the LB retrogradely and either an atriofascicular, a long decrementally conducting, or a short decrementally conducting AV BT anterogradely.7,13

Diagnostic Maneuvers During Tachycardia

Atrial Extrastimulation and Atrial Pacing during Tachycardia

To prove the presence of a BT and its participation in the SVT, a late-coupled AES is delivered from the lateral RA (close to the BT) when the AV junctional portion of the atrium is refractory, so that the AES does not penetrate the AVN, as indicated by the lack of advancement of local atrial activation in the HB or coronary sinus ostium (CS os) recording. Therefore, such an AES cannot conduct to the ventricle over the AVN; this maneuver is analogous to the introduction of VES when the HB is refractory during orthodromic AVRT. If this AES advances (or delays) the timing of the next ventricular activation, it indicates that an anterogradely conducting AV or atriofascicular BT is present, and excludes nodoventricular and nodofascicular BTs. If the AES advances (or delays) the timing of the next ventricular activation and the advanced (or delayed) QRS morphology is identical to that during the SVT, this proves that the AV or atriofascicular BT also mediates preexcitation during the SVT, either as an integral part of the SVT circuit or as an innocent bystander. On the other hand, if the AES advances the timing of both the next ventricular activation and subsequent atrial activation, it proves that the SVT is an antidromic AVRT using an AV or atriofascicular BT anterogradely, and excludes preexcited AVNRT (Fig. 19-4). Advancement of both ventricular and atrial activation by such an AES requires anterograde conduction over the BT followed by retrograde conduction over the AVN. This can occur during antidromic AVRT but not in AVNRT, because in the setting of AVNRT the HB would be refractory because of anterograde activation by the time the advanced ventricular impulse invades the HPS retrogradely, with subsequent failure of the advanced ventricular activation to penetrate the HPS-AVN and affect the timing of subsequent atrial activation.7,13

During entrainment of the SVT by atrial pacing at a CL slightly shorter than the tachycardia CL, the presence of a fixed short VH interval suggests antidromic AVRT, but does not exclude AVNRT. Atrial pacing can usually terminate the SVT; whereby anterograde block is always produced in the AVN, with or without block in the BT. A short-coupled AES can block in the BT, terminating the SVT (in the setting of antidromic AVRT) or changing the SVT to a narrow QRS complex SVT at the same CL and same HA interval (in the setting of preexcited AVNRT).

Differential Diagnosis

The goals of programmed electrical stimulation during SVT are evaluation of the relationship among the His potential, the QRS, and the VH interval during atrial pacing and during SVT and differentiation between the different types of atypical BTs (Table 19-1). In addition, exclusion of a separate BT is necessary, especially if a rapid and fixed VA interval exists during incremental rate ventricular pacing. Furthermore, it is important to differentiate between antidromic AVRT using the BT anterogradely and preexcited AVNRT, in which the BT is an innocent bystander (Table 19-2).

TABLE 19-1 Differentiation among Different Types of Atypical Bypass Tracts

Preexcited QRS Morphology

Site of Earliest Ventricular Activation

Influence of Site of Atrial Stimulation

AES Delivered from Lateral RA During Antidromic AVRT when AV Junctional Atrium Is Refractory VH Interval during Maximal Preexcitation or Antidromic AVRT Presence of VA Block or AV Dissociation VA block or AV dissociation during the SVT excludes atriofascicular, short decrementally conducting AV BTs, and long decrementally conducting AV BTs, but does not exclude nodofascicular and nodoventricular BTs. Effects of Adenosine

AES = atrial extrastimulation; AV = atrioventricular; AVRT = atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia; HV = His bundle–ventricular; LBBB = left bundle branch block; RA = right atrium; RBBB = right bundle branch block; RV = right ventricle; SVT = supraventricular tachycardia; VA = ventriculoatrial; VH = ventricular–His bundle; V-RB = ventricular–right bundle branch.

TABLE 19-2 Differentiation between Antidromic AVRT and Preexcited AVNRT Using an Atypical BT

SVT Induction
Features of the SVT
AES Delivered from Lateral RA when AV Junction Is Refractory
Entrainment of the SVT with Atrial Pacing
RV Apical Pacing during NSR

AES = atrial extrastimulation; AV = atrioventricular; AVNRT = atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; AVRT = atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia; BT = bypass tract; CL = cycle length; HA = His bundle–atrial; NSR = normal sinus rhythm; RA = right atrium; RBBB = right bundle branch block; RV = right ventricle; SVT = supraventricular tachycardia; VA = ventriculoatrial; VES = ventricular extrastimulation; VH = ventricular–His bundle.

Localization of the Bypass Tract

Mapping principles for typical AV BTs—searching for sites with the earliest atrial activation during retrograde BT conduction and earliest ventricular activation during anterograde BT conduction—are largely inapplicable in the case of atypical BTs because of their unusual course and conduction properties. Therefore, different approaches are used.

Mapping of the ventricular insertion site of atriofascicular and long decrementally conducting AV BTs is difficult because of the long intracardiac course and distal insertion of these BTs, which shows extensive arborization over a wide area of ventricular muscle, with a diameter of up to 0.5 to 2 cm. A propensity to temporary loss of conduction of the atypical BT because of catheter trauma further complicates ventricular mapping.5

Mapping of the atrial insertion site can be performed by (1) P-delta interval mapping by stimulation at different atrial sites, (2) recording of the BT potential at the tricuspid annulus, and (3) AES from the RA during antidromic AVRT.8

Careful mapping of the tricuspid annulus and the anterior free wall of the RV typically demonstrates discrete potentials with complexes comparable to those recorded at the AV junction. The BT potential is analogous to the His potential. Atrial pacing, AES, and adenosine produce delay proximal to BT potential with a constant BT potential to QRS (BT-V) interval. Faster atrial pacing produces Wenckebach block proximal to the BT potential.13

Mapping the Atrial Insertion Site

Mapping the Ventricular Insertion Site

Mapping the Bypass Tract Potential

Direct recording of the BT potential at the tricuspid annulus is the most precise and preferred method of localizing the atypical BT. The BT potential is usually a low-amplitude, high-frequency recording made at the tricuspid annulus, which resembles a His potential (Fig. 19-5). Only the annular and subannular portions of the BT have been successfully recorded; attempts to record potentials from the atrial portion (corresponding to nodal-like tissue) have been unsuccessful. Distinct atrial, BT, and ventricular potentials can be found at the BT atrial insertion site. Recording a BT potential can be successful during NSR, atrial pacing, or preexcited SVT. However, recording of a BT potential along the tricuspid annulus may not be successful in up to 48% of cases. Furthermore, because of the low amplitude of the BT potential, it is difficult or impossible to record it during AF. Additionally, this technique presents the risk of producing mechanical block in the BT. Nevertheless, this method is less time-consuming and more precise than the previous ones.8,13

Mapping Sites of Mechanically Induced Loss of Preexcitation

Atypical BTs are particularly sensitive to mechanical trauma, and catheter manipulation along the tricuspid annulus during mapping of the BT may result in loss of BT function, even as a result of gentle pressure from the catheter tip. When mapping is performed during preexcited atrial pacing or SVT, damage to the BT is indicated by a sudden, transient loss of preexcitation. This phenomenon can be used to localize the BT precisely (bump mapping). Conduction block typically occurs while a BT potential is still recorded; thus, conduction is interrupted within the ventricular course of the BT. Block usually lasts from a few beats to a few minutes but can last for hours, after which preexcitation resumes. This method can be used during any consistently preexcited rhythm (atrial pacing, AF, and antidromic AVRT). However, if it occurs during antidromic AVRT, termination of the tachycardia may result in catheter displacement and loss of the exact location of the BT. Additionally, interruption of BT conduction can occur as the catheter is passing the area, and where the catheter comes to rest may not be the same site as where loss of BT function occurred; in this situation, the target cannot be relocated until BT conduction resumes. Delivery of radiofrequency (RF) energy at a site at which catheter pressure caused loss of preexcitation may successfully eliminate conduction in the BT; however, it is best to wait to deliver energy until preexcitation resumes, because of the possibility that the catheter position may have changed. Electroanatomical mapping (e.g., CARTO, NavX) can help tag sites of interest, facilitating precise relocation of the ablation catheter to these sites if it has been determined that they are a good ablation target. Atriofascicular BTs are more susceptible to mechanically induced block, probably suggesting that these BTs are composed of thinner strands or are located closer to the endocardium.13

Ablation

Target of Ablation

Direct recording of the BT potential at the tricuspid annulus is the most precise and preferred method of localizing the BT and serves as the target of ablation (see Fig. 19-5).7,13 Ablation at the ventricular insertion site of the BT offers no advantage over targeting the atrial insertion site because there is evidence that a variable degree of arborization of the distal insertion site occurs in some patients, with the potential of requiring ablation of a relatively large amount of ventricular myocardium to be effective.5,8

However, when a BT potential along the tricuspid annulus cannot be recorded, ablation of the distal insertion sites of atriofascicular BTs becomes an alternative and has been found to be highly effective, but is commonly (57%) associated with the development of RBBB. Ablation of the RB can carry a proarrhythmic effect and facilitate induction of the SVT or cause incessant tachycardia; however, this is not a concern as long as the BT itself is also successfully ablated.8,13

Using these methods, the locations of successful ablation of atypical BTs are found to be mostly along the lateral tricuspid annulus, with a minority along the septal aspect of the tricuspid annulus or within the ventricle. Atriofascicular and long decrementally conducting AV BTs tend (84%) to cross the tricuspid annulus in a lateral, anterolateral, or anterior region, whereas short decrementally conducting AV BTs are roughly equally distributed between these and a posterior or septal region.

Fasciculoventricular Bypass Tracts

Electrocardiographic Features

In patients with fasciculoventricular BTs, preexcitation is always present during NSR. The ECG preexcitation pattern can mimic that of manifest WPW pattern, especially that of superoparaseptal AV BTs, with a normal frontal plane axis between 0 and 75 degrees and precordial RS transitional zone in leads V2-V3. With fasciculoventricular BTs, the PR interval is normal despite the presence of preexcitation (Fig. 19-6). This is in contrast to superoparaseptal AV BTs, which result in the WPW pattern with significant shortening of the PR interval because of the relative proximity of the BT location to the sinus node.

Several ECG findings in lead V1 favor fasciculoventricular BTs as the cause of preexcitation, including: (1) PR interval greater than 110 milliseconds; (2) R wave width less than 35 milliseconds; (3) S wave amplitude less than 20 mm; (4) flat or negative delta wave; and (5) notching in the descending limb of the S wave (see Fig. 19-6).18

Electrophysiological Testing

With fasciculoventricular BTs, preexcitation is present during NSR with a normal AH interval and short HV interval. The earliest ventricular activation occurs at the HB region (Table 19-3).

TABLE 19-3 Features of Fasciculoventricular Bypass Tracts

HB = His bundle; HV = His bundle–ventricular; NSR = normal sinus rhythm.

Progressively shorter atrial pacing CLs or AES coupling intervals produce progressive prolongation of the PR and AH intervals but with a fixed degree of preexcitation, a constant and short HV interval, and a fixed relationship between the His potential and RB potential (Fig. 19-7). AVN Wenckebach block can develop, which is then associated with a fixed degree of preexcitation and a constant, short HV interval. The loss of AV conduction is associated with loss of preexcitation. AES can result in block in the fasciculoventricular BT, producing a sudden loss of preexcitation and prolongation of the HV interval to normal values (see Fig. 19-7).

HB pacing normalizes the HV interval and eliminates preexcitation in all types of BTs except for fasciculoventricular BTs, in which a fixed degree of preexcitation and a constant short HV interval remain unchanged during HB pacing (see Fig. 19-6).

When adenosine administration slows AVN conduction, an increase in the degree of preexcitation is noted in all types of BTs, as long as adenosine does not block the BT, except for fasciculoventricular BTs, in which the degree of preexcitation and HV interval remain fixed. Moreover, adenosine administration can be associated with complete AV block and junctional escape beats and, in the setting of fasciculoventricular BTs, these beats are associated with the same degree of preexcitation and the same HV interval as during NSR, even when these ectopic beats are associated with retrograde VA block and no atrial depolarization.

Atrio-Hisian Bypass Tracts

General Considerations

Patients with palpitations who had a short PR interval but normal QRS complex in the resting ECG were first described in 1938 and then further evaluated by Lown and colleagues in 1952.19 The latter report consisted of a retrospective examination of 13,500 ECGs and identified short PR intervals in a mixed group of 200 subjects, most of whom had a normal QRS complex (Fig. 19-8). The authors described a “syndrome” characterized by short PR interval, narrow QRS complex, and recurrent paroxysmal SVTs. They initially ascribed this syndrome to the presence of an AV nodal BT.7,19 A variety of explanations were later offered to account for the short PR interval.

Although the incidence of palpitations was significantly higher in these patients with short PR intervals when compared with a control group with a normal PR interval (17% versus 0.5%), most contemporary electrophysiologists do not consider the “Lown-Ganong-Levine syndrome” to be a recognized syndrome consisting of a single entity but an electrocardiographic description. It probably represents one end of the normal spectrum of AVN conduction properties. Therefore, the use of the term is inappropriate and should be discouraged and the mechanism responsible for the short PR interval should be used instead. The persistence of the term probably relates to the appealing parallel with the initials of the WPW syndrome.

The short PR interval can have different mechanisms: (1) enhanced AVN conduction (perhaps using specialized intranodal fibers), which is believed responsible for most cases of short PR interval and is secondary to an anatomically small AVN, enhanced sympathetic tone, or a variant of normal; (2) atrio-Hisian BT (rare), in which case AF or AFL with a rapid ventricular response is the presenting arrhythmia; (3) ectopic atrial rhythm with differential input into the AVN; and (4) isorhythmic AV dissociation, whereby the short PR interval is not caused by a conducted P wave.7

Supraventricular Tachycardias in Patients with Short PR Intervals

Patients with Atrio-Hisian Bypass Tracts

These patients primarily present with AF and AFL with a rapid ventricular response, and do not develop reentrant SVTs using the AV junction as one limb.7 Rapid ventricular response during AF depends on refractoriness of the tissue responsible for AV conduction (i.e., AVN or BT) and not on the site of insertion for that tissue.

Electrophysiological Testing

Baseline Observations During Normal Sinus Rhythm

Enhanced AVN conduction is characterized by a short AH interval (<60 milliseconds) and normal HV interval.7 In rare cases in which the AVN is completely bypassed by an atrio-Hisian BT, the HV interval is short. The HV interval in these cases is artifactually short because the proximal HB and the ventricle are activated in parallel since the atrio-Hisian BT inserts into the distal HB (i.e., the proximal HB is activated retrogradely).

Atrial Pacing and Atrial Extrastimulation

Patients with Enhanced Atrioventricular Node Conduction

The AH interval prolongs with progressively shorter atrial pacing CLs and AES coupling intervals.7 The prolongation in the AH interval is smooth, continuous, and blunted, with a maximal increase in the AH interval of 100 milliseconds or less during pacing at a CL of 300 milliseconds compared with the value measured during NSR. The maximal AH interval (at any pacing rate) is rarely longer than 200 milliseconds and 1:1 conduction typically is maintained to pacing rates greater than 200 beats/min.

The AH interval response can be characteristic of dual AVN physiology, with an initial blunted small prolongation in the AH interval followed by a significant jump at a critical pacing CL or AES coupling interval, while maintaining 1:1 conduction at a pacing rate greater than 200 beats/min. In such patients, the maximal AH interval can be greater than 200 milliseconds, and the maximal prolongation in the AH interval can be greater than 100 milliseconds.7 Atrial pacing from the CS is associated with shorter AH intervals, shorter Wenckebach CLs, and shorter AVN effective refractory periods, suggesting a preferential input into the AVN.

References

1. Mahaim I., Benatt A. Nouvelles recherches sur les connections superieures de la branche du faisceau de His-Tawara avec cloison interventriculaire. Cardiologia. 1937;1:61.

2. Mahaim I., Winston M.R. Recherches d’anatomie comparee et de pathologie experimentale sur les connexions hautes des His-Tawara. Cardiologia. 1941;33:651-653.

3. Mahaim I. Kent’s fibers and the A-V paraspecific conduction through the upper connections of the bundle of His-Tawara. Am Heart J. 1947;33:651-653.

4. Benditt D.G., Lu F. Atriofascicular pathways: fuzzy nomenclature or merely wishful thinking? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006;17:261-265.

5. Miller J., Olgin J.E. Catheter ablation of free-wall accessory pathways and “Mahaim” fibers. In: Zipes D.P., Haissaguerre M., editors. Catheter ablation of arrhythmias. Armonk, NY: Futura; 2002:277-303.

6. Sternick E.B., Lokhandwala Y., Timmermans C., et al. The atrioventricular interval during pre-excited tachycardia: a simple way to distinguish between decrementally or rapidly conducting accessory pathways. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:1351-1358.

7. Josephson M.E. Preexcitation syndromes. In: Josephson M.E., editor. Clinical cardiac electrophysiology. ed 4. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008:339-445.

8. Kothari S., Gupta A.K., Lokhandwala Y.Y., et al. Atriofascicular pathways: where to ablate? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006;29:1226-1233.

9. Davidson N.C., Morton J.B., Sanders P., Kalman J. Latent Mahaim fiber as a cause of antidromic reciprocating tachycardia: recognition and successful radiofrequency ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002;13:74-78.

10. Sternick E.B., Fagundes M.L., Cruz F.E., et al. Short atrioventricular Mahaim fibers: observations on their clinical, electrocardiographic, and electrophysiologic profile. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16:127-134.

11. Kalbfleisch S., Bowman K., Augostini R. A single Mahaim fiber causing both antidromic and orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19:740-742.

12. Sternick E.B., Timmermans C., Sosa E., et al. The electrocardiogram during sinus rhythm and tachycardia in patients with Mahaim fibers: the importance of an “rS” pattern in lead III. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1626-1635.

13. Miller J.M., Rothman S.A., Hsia H.H., Buxton A.E. Ablation of Mahaim fibers. In: Huang S.K.S., Wilber D.J., editors. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias: basic concepts and clinical applications. Armonk, NY: Futura; 2000:559-578.

14. Bogun F., Krishnan S., Siddiqui M., et al. Electrogram characteristics in postinfarction ventricular tachycardia: effect of infarct age. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:667-674.

15. Sternick E.B., Rodriguez L.M., Timmermans C., et al. Effects of right bundle branch block on the antidromic circus movement tachycardia in patients with presumed atriofascicular pathways. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006;17:256-260.

16. Sternick E.B., Gerken L.M., Vrandecic M. Appraisal of “Mahaim” automatic tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002;13:244-249.

17. Sternick E.B., Sosa E.A., Timmermans C., et al. Automaticity in Mahaim fibers. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004;15:738-744.

18. Oh S., Choi Y.S., Choi E.K., et al. Electrocardiographic characteristics of fasciculoventricular pathways. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005;28:25-28.

19. Lown B., Ganong W.F., Levine S.A. The syndrome of short P-R interval, normal QRS complex and paroxysmal rapid heart action. Circulation. 1952;5:693-706.

Share this: