Treatment of cancer-related pain

Published on 07/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1213 times

Treatment of cancer-related pain

Tim J. Lamer, MD and Stephanie A. Neuman, MD

Pain is exceedingly prevalent among patients with malignancies and is often suboptimally managed. It is estimated that approximately two thirds of patients with metastatic cancer have pain. One third of patients have pain while undergoing active therapy for disease, and more than three quarters have pain during the last stages of illness. With the use of pharmacologic agents, interventional therapies, and other modalities, effective analgesia can be attained for 70% to 90% of people with cancer.

Mechanisms of cancer pain

Two major pain categories exist: nociceptive pain and neuropathic pain. Nociceptive pain results from tissue damage and can be further subdivided into somatic and visceral pain. Somatic pain may originate from multiple sites—including skin, muscle, joints, connective tissue, or bone—and is mediated by somatic afferent fibers (Aδ and C fibers). Somatic pain is most often described as sharp, throbbing, and well localized if it is superficial, or it is described as dull, aching, and less well localized if it is deep. Visceral pain originates from solid or hollow visceral organs and is mediated by visceral nociceptive afferent fibers that travel along with visceral sympathetic efferent fibers. Visceral pain is often described as a dull diffuse pain that is frequently referred in a dermatomal fashion.

Neuropathic pain occurs when there is damage to or dysfunction of nerves in the peripheral or central nervous system. The pain frequently has dysesthetic (e.g., burning, pricking) or paroxysmal (e.g., stabbing, shooting, electric shock-like) qualities and may be associated with sensory, motor, or autonomic dysfunction. Neuropathic pain may be centrally or peripherally generated. When the pain is coupled with loss of sensory input, it is referred to as deafferentation pain (e.g., phantom limb pain). When dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system plays a major role, the pain is referred to as sympathetically mediated pain (e.g., complex regional pain syndrome). Sympathetically mediated pain may occur after a nerve or limb injury; the patient often has diffuse burning pain of the affected extremity associated with allodynia, hyperpathia, sudomotor dysfunction, and signs of impaired blood flow regulation to the extremity. This pain is believed to be mediated, at least in part, by sympathetic efferent fibers. Deafferentation pain and sympathetically mediated pain are examples of centrally generated neuropathic pain. Examples of peripherally generated pain include polyneuropathies and mononeuropathies. Compared with nociceptive pain, neuropathic pain is often less responsive to conventional pharmacologic therapy.

One or more of these mechanisms may contribute to a patient’s pain and may occur as a result of the primary cancerous lesion, metastatic disease, neural compression, or treatments, such as radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or surgery. Pain may also originate from secondary nonmalignant sources (e.g., herniated nucleus pulposus, spinal stenosis, myofascial pain syndrome).

Medical therapy

The World Health Organization’s three-step analgesic ladder is a validated, clinical pain treatment algorithm that is very helpful in outlining a therapeutic pain management strategy for patients with cancer. The analgesic ladder progresses in a stepwise approach as pain increases and is utilized to meet individual needs. The approach begins with nonopioids; then, as necessary, it progresses to intermediate-potency opioids for moderate pain and then to more potent opioids for severe pain. Nonopioid medications and adjuvant medications may be used at each step depending on the type or types of pain being treated.

Adjuvant analgesic agents play a major role in treating patients with malignancies (Table 215-1). Most of these medications have a primary indication other than pain but have analgesic properties. The choice of adjuvant is made based on several assessments, including the type of pain, pharmacologic characteristics and adverse effects of the drug, interactions with other medications, and patient comorbid conditions (e.g., depression). Adjuvant agents comprise a diverse group of medications and can be broadly classified into multipurpose adjuvant analgesic agents and adjuvants specific for neuropathic pain, bone pain, musculoskeletal pain, and bowel obstruction.

Table 215-1

Adjuvant Analgesic Agents for the Treatment of Cancer-Related Pain: Major Classes

Drug Class Example(s)
Multipurpose Analgesic Agents
Antidepressants  
  Tricyclic antidepressants
  SSRIs
  NSRIs
  Other agents
Amitriptyline, desipramine, nortriptyline
Citalopram, paroxetine
Duloxetine, venlafaxine
Bupropion
Corticosteroids Dexamethasone, prednisone
α2-Adrenergic agonists Clonidine, tizanidine
Neuroleptic agents Olanzapine
Adjuvants for Neuropathic Pain
Anticonvulsants Carbamazepine, gabapentin, phenytoin, pregabalin, topiramate
Local anesthetic agents Lidocaine, mexiletine
NMDA receptor antagonists Dextromethorphan, ketamine
Other agents Baclofen, cannabinoids, capsaicin, lidocaine, lidocaine/prilocaine, psychostimulants (methylphenidate, modafinil)
Topical drugs Capsaicin, EMLA cream, lidocaine patch 5%
Adjuvants for Bone Pain
Corticosteroids Dexamethasone, prednisone
Calcitonin  
Bisphosphonates Clodronate, pamidronate, zoledronic acid
Radiopharmaceuticals Samarium-153, strontium-89
Adjuvants for Musculoskeletal Pain
Muscle relaxants Carisoprodol, cyclobenzaprine, metaxalone, methocarbamol, orphenadrine
Baclofen  
Benzodiazepines Clonazepam, diazepam, lorazepam
Tizanidine  
Adjuvants for Pain from Bowel Obstruction
Anticholinergics Glycopyrrolate, scopolamine
Corticosteroids Dexamethasone, prednisone
Octreotide  

image

EMLA, Eutectic mixture of local anesthetics [prilocaine and lidocaine]; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate; NSRIs, norepinephrine-serotonin reuptake inhibitors; SSRIs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

Tricyclic antidepressants are the most common antidepressant used in the treatment of chronic pain conditions; however, their use may be limited by the frequent occurrence of associated adverse effects, such as orthostatic hypotension, sedation, cardiotoxicity, and drug-induced confusion. Corticosteroids are useful for bone pain, neuropathic pain, headaches secondary to increased intracranial pressure, spinal cord compression, and pain due to obstruction of a hollow viscus or organ-capsule distention. Corticosteroids may have other benefits, including improvement in appetite, nausea, malaise, and overall quality of life. The α2-adrenergic agonists clonidine and tizanidine are also useful. Intraspinally administered clonidine has been shown to be beneficial in severe, intractable cancer pain. Neuroleptic agents, such as olanzapine, have been found to decrease pain and opioid consumption and to improve cognitive function and anxiety.

Cancer-related neuropathic pain is widely treated with anticonvulsants. Gabapentin is considered a first-line agent. Pregabalin is a similar anticonvulsant with evidence of analgesic efficacy in certain neuropathic pain states. Orally and parenterally administered local anesthetic agents have analgesic properties in patients with neuropathic pain. The NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartic acid) receptor antagonists have been shown to have analgesic effects, with ketamine, specifically, being found to reduce opioid requirements and relieve cancer pain.

Bone pain and pathologic fractures are common in patients with cancer. Radiation therapy is administered when possible. Adjuvants that have been found to be valuable in treating bone pain include calcitonin, bisphosphonates, and certain radiopharmaceuticals (radionuclides that are absorbed at areas of high bone turnover).

If surgical decompression is not feasible in patients with a malignant bowel obstruction, the use of the somatostatin analog octreotide, anticholinergic drugs (hyoscine, glycopyrrolate), and corticosteroids may be beneficial.

Other systemically administered drugs such as baclofen, cannabinoids, benzodiazepines, and psychostimulants have also been used as adjuvant analgesics. The 5% lidocaine patch, EMLA cream (a eutectic mixture of the local anesthetic agents prilocaine and lidocaine), and capsaicin (an ingredient in chili pepper that causes release of substance P) may be useful in patients with localized pain syndromes, such as chest pain after mastectomy, radiation-induced dermatitis, post-thoracotomy pain, and others.

Not all cancer-related pain can be managed with orally or parenterally administered medications alone. Pain may be inadequately controlled, or doses may be limited by intolerable systemic adverse effects of the analgesic agent. In these situations, interventional therapy is often undertaken.

Interventional therapy

Given that the use of the World Health Organization’s analgesic ladder does not provide adequate analgesia for all patients with cancer, a revised stepwise approach has been developed that includes the use of interventional techniques (Figure 215-1).

For those patients with pain that is refractory to treatment with medications, multiple interventional therapies exist to provide relief. Options include nerve blocks and other injection therapies (e.g., joint and trigger-point injections), neurolytic blocks, epidurally and intrathecally administered analgesia, neuromodulation (e.g., spinal cord stimulator), and advanced neurosurgical techniques (e.g., cordotomy, midline myelotomy, rhizotomy, neurostimulation).

Neuraxially administered analgesia

Drug toxicity secondary to high-dose opioids and adjuvant medications is a leading cause of failure in the management of cancer-related pain. By changing the route of drug administration to an epidural or intrathecal route, toxicities are reduced. In addition to reducing systemic adverse effects, implantable intrathecal drug-delivery systems have been found to provide better pain relief and to extend survival in patients with cancer. Little consensus exists on when to use intrathecal versus epidural routes of administration and when to use an implantable versus an external pump. Epidurally administered analgesia is often chosen if there is a need for more focal analgesia and if a large amount of local anesthetic agent is required because the patient has extreme opioid intolerance. Intrathecally administered analgesia is favored if the pain is more diffuse or if there is abnormal pathology in the epidural space. In general, an external system is used if the patient has a short life expectancy (<3 months), needs frequent self-administered doses of analgesic agents, or needs an epidural infusion (generally requires infusion volumes too great for an implanted pump) or if reprogramming or refilling capabilities are not near the patient’s home. Factors that lead to the decision to place an implantable pump include a longer life expectancy (>3 months), access to pump refill or reprograming capabilities, diffuse pain (e.g., widespread metastasis), and a favorable response to an intrathecal trial. Numerous medications are available for neuraxially administered analgesia, including opioids, α2-adrenergic agonists, calcium channel blockers, and local anesthetic agents. Single agents or a combination of agents may be used, depending upon the pain mechanism involved.

Nerve blocks and ablative procedures

Neurolytic nerve blocks and ablative procedures can be effective for treating refractory pain. Neurolytic blocks with phenol, ethanol, radiofrequency ablation, or cryoablation are most appropriate for patients with advanced disease and decreased life expectancy when other, less invasive, options have failed to provide adequate relief. Celiac plexus block is very effective for intra abdominal malignancies, particularly pancreatic cancer. For tumors of the pelvis, lumbar sympathetic, superior hypogastric plexus, or ganglion impar neurolytic blocks are useful. Intercostal and paravertebral blocks are valuable for treating chest pain (e.g., rib metastasis). For perineal pain, sacral nerve neurolytic blocks are beneficial, and trigeminal nerve blocks are often effective for facial pain.

Surgical procedures

Anterolateral cordotomy was the first effective surgical procedure on the spinal cord that was introduced for pain relief. However, significant complications can occur (e.g., incontinence, respiratory problems) with this operation. Bilateral anterocordotomy and commissural myelotomy are additional surgical techniques that can be used to relieve midline pain in a very small subset of carefully selected patients. Punctate midline myelotomy (a neuroablative operation that interrupts the midline of the dorsal column) is a newer surgical technique that was developed to treat otherwise intractable abdominal and pelvic cancer-related pain.

As with all interventional techniques, these interventions are not without potential complications; therefore, the provider must carefully weigh the risks and benefits for each patient individually (Table 215-2).

Table 215-2

Potential Complications of Invasive Procedures for the Treatment of Cancer-Related Pain

Treatment Potential Adverse Effects
Neurolytic blocks Sensorimotor impairment
Sympathetic or parasympathetic impairment
Postural hypotension
Bowel or bladder dysfunction
Pain recurrence
Deafferentation pain
Pneumothorax*
Spinally administered opioids Respiratory depression
Pruritus
Urinary retention
Nausea and vomiting
Spinally administered clonidine Hypotension
Sedation
Spinally administered local anesthetic agent Sympathetic blockade
Exaggerated spread
Motor block
Neurosurgical procedures Bladder dysfunction
Motor weakness
Deafferentation pain
Respiratory dysfunction§
Neuraxial catheters Catheter break or leak
Catheter obstruction
Infection
CSF leak
Spinally administered ziconotide Psychiatric symptoms#
Motor deficits
Meningitis
Seizures

CSF, Cerebrospinal fluid.

*Celiac plexus.

Hypotension, urinary retention.

High block.

§Cervical cordotomy.

Cellulitis, epidural abscess, meningitis.

#Hallucinations, new or worsening depression, suicidal ideation.