Thoracic Aortic Disease

Published on 13/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3238 times

Chapter 11 Thoracic Aortic Disease

AORTIC ANATOMY AND SIZE

The sinus part of the aorta includes the three sinuses of Valsalva above the aortic leaflets. The aortic annulus is that part of the fibrous skeleton of the heart to which the aortic leaflets attach. The ascending aorta extends from the sinuses of Valsalva to the brachiocephalic artery. The sinotubular ridge is the junction between the sinuses of Valsalva and the tubular ascending aorta. Most aortic diseases do not cross the sinotubular ridge but involve either the sinuses below or the ascending aorta above. The major exception is the annuloaortic ectasia seen in Marfan syndrome. The aortic arch is the transverse segment from which the brachiocephalic, left carotid, and left subclavian arteries originate. The aortic isthmus is the segment between the left subclavian artery and the ductus arteriosus or ligamentum arteriosus. The descending aorta begins after the ductus and ends at the aortic hiatus of the diaphragm. Most of the ascending aorta is within the pericardium.

The size of the aorta is often critical for diagnosing aortic disease. Several measurements are useful in identifying the upper range of normal. On the frontal chest film the distance between the left border of the trachea and the lateral border of the aortic arch is always less than 4 cm in adults and usually less than 3 cm in those younger than 30 years of age. On an aortogram or tomographic scan of the ascending aorta, the normal diameter should be less than 4 cm (Table 11-1). Longitudinal enlargement is more difficult to quantitate but is manifest by tortuosity, occasional kinking or buckling, and displacement into the adjacent lung or mediastinum.

TABLE 11-1 Size of the normal adult thoracic aorta

  Mean (cm) Upper Limit of Normal* (cm)
Aortic root 3.7 4.0
Ascending aorta 3.2 3.7
Descending aorta 2.5 2.8

* Two standard deviations above the mean.

From Aronberg DJ, Glazer HS, Madsen K, et al.: Normal thoracic aortic diameters by computed tomography, J Comput Assist Tomogr 8:247-250, 1984; Drexler M, Erbel R, Muller U, et al.: Measurement of intracardiac dimensions and structures in normal young adult subjects by transesophageal echocardiography, Am J Cardiol 65:1491-1496, 1990.

The diameter of the normal adult aorta has a wide range that gradually increases with age (Fig. 11-1).

In children less than 2 months old, the aortic isthmus—that portion from the left subclavian artery to the ligamentum arteriosum—is normally smaller than the adjacent descending aorta. This appearance looks like a preductal coarctation but is actually the normal development of the fetal aorta as it remolds following ductal closure. The increased blood flow in the fetus presumably enlarges the descending aorta adjacent to the ductus arteriosus. A normal isthmus may have a diameter equal to 40% of the ascending aorta, although most normal neonatal aortic arches are slightly larger than this.

AORTIC ANEURYSMS

Size and Types

There are a number of definitions of thoracic aneurysm, but most are keyed on the size at which there is potential for rupture (Fig. 11-2). An aortic diameter greater than 1.5 times normal is a commonly accepted definition of aneurysm. For practical purposes, aneurysms in the ascending aorta are greater than 5 cm, and those in the descending aorta are greater than 4 cm.

True aneurysms have all elements of the aorta incorporated into the wall of the aneurysm. The most common true aneurysm is a fusiform aneurysm that involves the entire circumference of the aorta. A saccular aneurysm is an eccentric dilatation that involves one side of the aorta (Fig. 11-3). For example, most infected aneurysms are saccular. It can occur in a short segment or can involve the entire aorta. A vast majority of asymmetric or saccular aneurysms fall under the category of false or pseudoaneurysms. False aneurysms have a perforation into the intima and media. An example is an aortic transection from trauma.

A radiologic description of the aneurysm includes the location and extent, the type, and in conjunction with the clinical history, the cause. Box 11-1 lists the common associations, but many aneurysms fall into several categories. Atherosclerotic aneurysms are usually fusiform and occur in the inferior parts of the aorta. Infected aneurysms may be either true or false. Syphilitic aneurysms can be either saccular or fusiform. The list is not inclusive but serves as a starting point for diagnosis and management.

Chest Film Findings

The chest film is one of the first examinations obtained when thoracic aortic aneurysm, dissection, or transection is suspected, even though its sensitivity and specificity for these diagnoses are widely variable. The purpose of the chest film is to assess the size of the aorta and to identify a rupture. A valuable use of the chest film is to follow the mediastinal contours over a time interval to detect an increasing mediastinal width (Box 11-2). Tracheal or bronchial compression can be suspected when these structures are extrinsically deviated (Fig. 11-4). Compression of a pulmonary artery is recognized by unilateral pulmonary oligemia. For most of its thoracic course, the lesser curvature of the aorta is not visible on the chest film so the only signs of aortic enlargement are those of the greater curvature displacing adjacent structures. Other signs appear when the aorta has ruptured into the mediastinum. Unilateral pleural fluid or pericardial fluid usually indicates impending exsanguination or cardiac tamponade. Rupture into the mediastinum is initially constrained by the tissue in the mediastinum and pleural compartments. The chest film signs of aortic rupture are those of mediastinal hemorrhage (Box 11-3).

ACQUIRED DISEASES

Aortic Dissection

Although Morgagni recognized aortic dissection at necropsy over 200 years ago, even today it may be difficult to diagnose, and it certainly remains a therapeutic enigma. Most aortic dissections, or dissecting hematomas, at least in their early stages, are not aneurysms because they are not a localized enlargement of the aorta. The term dissecting aneurysm should be reserved for those cases in which the aorta (usually the false channel) is actually dilated. The clinical picture of a person with abrupt, severe chest pain associated with a loss of one or more peripheral pulses strongly suggests dissection; however, atypical onset of myocardial infarction, pulmonary or systemic emboli, musculoskeletal syndromes, and other chest pain syndromes may mimic the presence of aortic dissection, and therefore aortic imaging is mandatory for a definitive diagnosis. Similarly, a small percentage of dissections are “silent,” occurring without pain, and are discovered only from an abnormal chest film. In these cases, other types of thoracic aneurysm, penetrating aortic ulcer, or nonvascular mediastinal disease must be distinguished from aortic dissection.

Morphologically, separation of the media from the adventitia for a variable length along the aorta characterizes dissections. Most dissections have a tear in the intima, which allows a column of blood to advance and fill the false channel. A few dissections, however, have no tear in the true lumen and presumably have arisen from a hemorrhage in the vasa vasorum.

Almost all dissections arise in either the ascending aorta, approximately 1 cm above the sinotubular ridge or in the descending aorta at or just beyond the aortic isthmus. Spontaneous dissections that originate elsewhere in the abdominal aorta, coronary, renal, carotid, and other arterial beds are uncommon.

The intimal tear into the false channel usually is single but variations abound so that multiple entry and distal reentry tears are frequently observed by aortic imaging and at necropsy. Although most tears go distally, the aorta can dissect in a retrograde direction. If the dissection reaches the aortic root, it may rupture into the aortic root causing cardiac tamponade, occlude the right coronary artery, or create aortic regurgitation. Dissections in the ascending aorta usually follow the greater curvature of the aortic arch; the false channel forms anteriorly on the right side in the ascending aorta and then follows a spiral course to the posterior and left lateral portion of the descending thoracic aorta. Although its distal extent is quite variable, the false channel frequently proceeds on the left side to compromise the left renal artery and left iliac artery.

Complications

Aortic rupture into the pericardium, pleural space, or mediastinum can be suggested on the plain chest film by a large heart diameter, pleural fluid, and a wide mediastinum. This heralds the need for immediate pericardiocentesis and other cardiopulmonary supportive measures. A dissection can partially or completely occlude a branch of the aorta by compression of the true channel by the false channel or by adjacent compression from an intimal flap. Any artery arising from the aorta can be occluded, but the right coronary artery and the three arch vessels are commonly affected. Surgical treatment aims at preventing retrograde tear into the heart and pericardium by resecting the segment that contains the entry tear. An interposition graft is then inserted, collapsing the false channel distally. Dissections in the aortic root are treated with a composite graft with the prosthetic aortic valve sewn to the graft and the coronary arteries replanted into the sides of the graft.

When there is dissection of the ascending aorta, over half the patients have aortic regurgitation, which contributes to hemodynamic instability. Aortic regurgitation can be caused by an asymmetric tear that misaligns one leaflet below the other, by a tear that results in a flail leaflet, or by disruption of the annulus with subsequent lack of coaptation of the leaflets. Subsequent proximal dissection may extend into the walls of the heart, producing a fistula between the aorta and the atria or the right ventricle.

Plain Film Findings

The plain film findings of dissection are indirect but can suggest the need for further evaluation (Fig. 11-5). An abnormally wide mediastinum, separation of calcium from the wall of the aortic arch, a left apical pleural cap, pleural fluid, and displacement of the trachea and esophagus from the midline are important characteristics of a thoracic aortic abnormality. However, the chest film findings are insensitive for the detection of aortic dissection: Nearly one fifth of patients with dissection have normal chest films.

Tomographic Imaging

Computed tomography with intravenous contrast, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and echocardiography all have excellent sensitivity and specificity for detecting aortic dissection but each has limitations specific to its technology. Optimal computed tomography (CT) imaging is with intravenous contrast on a spiral scanner (Figures 11-6, 11-7). Spiral CT requires a correctly timed bolus of contrast media and has streak artifacts from the pulsating aortic wall that can mimic the intimal flap. Multidetector CT scanners with three-dimensional postprocessing reconstructions can rival the accuracy of catheter angiography.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

MRI does not require intravenous contrast and has more options to characterize the extent of the dissection. The imaging plane can be placed parallel to that of the aorta in addition to the coronal and axial slices. “White blood” gradient echo sequences and phase reconstruction techniques can help identify slowly flowing blood in the false channel. The major limitation of MRI is the resolution of the arch vessels, so that the distal extent of the dissection into small arteries is frequently not shown.

Because of slow blood flow, clotted false channels, and occasionally the twisted shape of the intimal flap, aortic dissection can be difficult to distinguish from other types of aneurysm and aortitis (Fig. 11-8). MRI is particularly useful in these situations because different pulse sequences and reconstruction techniques can be exploited to produce a distinction between flowing blood and static tissue. Spin echo sequences producing “black blood” images easily show the intimal flap when there is moderate flow in both channels. But in regions of slowly flowing blood, the signal in that region may be similar to tissue in the aortic wall and adjacent mediastinum. A number of techniques exist that can image slow velocity differences and separate nonmoving and clotted blood in the false channel from slow-moving blood. Even echocardiographic rephasing, the fortuitous occurrence of velocity compensation in the second echocardiogram, is recognized as a higher signal intensity in the second echocardiogram in regions of slowly flowing blood (Fig. 11-9). A caveat is that failure of the signal intensity on the second echocardiogram to be greater than the first echocardiographic image is often observed in regions of complex velocity changes such as those that occur in vortices and eddies around bends in the aorta.

One of the most sensitive ways to make the distinction between thrombus and slowly flowing blood is to reconstruct the original data as a phase image. All MRIs are generated as complex numbers, which are typically reconstructed as magnitude images. However, the same data can be displayed as a phase image, which then becomes a picture of the velocity of the tissue within each pixel. The phase image needs to be interpreted with the magnitude image to identify the area of concern where a thrombosed channel may be present. Changes in signal intensity, including alternating white to black phase breaks in the phase image, indicate flowing blood (Fig. 11-10).

Another strategy that can be quite helpful is to obtain a gradient echo cine study through the area that has questionable flow in the standard spin echo image. With velocity compensation, the gradient echo pulse sequence should be obtained at only one slice to avoid the inflow of partly saturated spins from a neighboring slice (Fig. 11-11).

Unlike the other techniques, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) can be carried out at the bedside. The major advantage over the other techniques is the quantitation of aortic regurgitation with color-flow Doppler. Its disadvantage is that the aortic arch cannot be completely imaged with either the transthoracic or transesophageal technique.

Catheter Approach

The site of catheterization will depend on which pulses are present. If no extremity pulses are felt, a pulmonary angiogram with delayed follow-through may show the dissection. However, a general principle is that angiography should be performed with an injection as close to the abnormality as possible, and therefore a femoral, axillary, or brachial arterial approach is preferred. Because the left iliac artery is most frequently involved with a dissection, the preferred route is a percutaneous transfemoral approach from the right side.

The ultimate goal is to place the catheter in the true lumen of the aorta about 2 cm above the sinotubular ridge of the aortic root. The identification of the true channel cannot always be ascertained from catheter location, the size of the channel, or the speed of blood flow alone because the false channel may compress the true channel in unusual ways. Separation of a catheter from the greater curvature of the aortic arch by a centimeter or more confirms the presence of an abnormality. The false channel generally has less flow velocity than the true channel and therefore fills later. Another sign that the false channel is opacified is that there are no arteries originating from it.

Although there has been much concern about the potential consequences of injecting into the false channel (such as possible extension of the dissection or aortic rupture), a more important criterion for a safe angiographic injection is the rapid washout of contrast material during the test injection. This assures a large-capacity reservoir for the contrast agent, allowing a safe injection. At times, even on the final angiogram, it is not possible to determine which is the true or which is the false channel; however, you can still perform an adequate and safe angiogram as long as a high-pressure injection is not made into a cul-de-sac. Either the true channel or false channel may be the main conduit, and therefore filming should extend about 20 seconds to see late filling. If only one channel appears to fill, either the false channel is clotted or it is a retrograde dissection with a distal entry point. Another injection, distal to the first, in the descending aorta with filming over the thorax should opacify the false channel if it is patent. Based on clinical presentation, an abdominal aortogram may be appropriate to search for complications involving the arteries to the gut, kidneys, and legs.

Signs of Dissection

The intimal flap, a lucency several millimeters thick outlined by contrast on both sides, is the hallmark of dissection. You can often identify the actual entry from one channel into another or into multiple channels and the subsequent flow of blood in either an antegrade or retrograde direction. This intimal tear may extend only a few centimeters (Fig. 11-12) or may extend the entire length of the aorta, even into peripheral vessels (Fig. 11-13). The leaflets of the aortic valve, particularly with annuloaortic ectasia or Marfan syndrome, may be effaced and appear as a lucency; the large aortic leaflets can be difficult to distinguish from a true intimal tear in the aortic root, particularly if large-film technique is used. Cine angiography usually resolves this problem. True tears may be further differentiated by their origin above the sinotubular ridge and extension backward into the valve.

An ulcerlike projection from the aorta may represent an early sign of dissection, although other types of aneurysms, including those caused by infection and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, may be associated with this finding. The base of the ulcer represents the defect in the intima leading to a thrombosed false channel (see Figure 11-13). In the descending aorta where side branches originate, the ulcer may be an occlusion or detachment of the intima from an intercostal artery.

The false channel may not opacify during angiography and, therefore, may present as a thick wall (usually >1 cm) along the greater curvature of the aorta (Fig. 11-14). An eccentric wall thickness greater than 1 cm is unusual in a clotted atherosclerotic or syphilitic aneurysm or aortitis. An unopacified channel may occasionally be seen if the injection was made proximal to the entry tear and the distal dissection has extended in a retrograde direction. Before the diagnosis of a thrombosed false channel is made, an injection should be made with the catheter at the level of the diaphragm to search for retrograde flow from a distant entry site. The thrombosed false channel has been called a “healed” dissection and is less liable to rupture late. Initially, the true channel is frequently smaller than the false channel, although either may enlarge to greater than the normal aortic width, then justifying the term dissecting aneurysm.

Aortic regurgitation may result from three mechanisms (Fig. 11-15):

In addition to occluding or transecting any vessels from the aorta, a dissection may compromise other mediastinal vessels. The expanding hematoma of the false channel may compress the right pulmonary artery. Similarly, it may both displace and compress the superior vena cava. On the left side of the mediastinum, because the false channel extends posterolaterally, the pulmonary veins are occasionally compressed. If this abnormality leads to reduced flow through the left lung, then a dissection may be confused with pulmonary embolism on a ventilationperfusion lung scan.

Annuloaortic Ectasia and Marfan Syndrome

Radiologic Techniques

Many of the clues to the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome are frequently visible on the chest film (Fig. 11-21). On the frontal film, the thoracic cage appears large and elongated with large-volume lungs. The heart may be shifted to the left from a narrow anteroposterior thoracic diameter. In normal young adults less than 20 years of age, the aorta should be inapparent. In contrast, aortic elongation and ectasia in this age group are common signs of Marfan syndrome. Cardiomegaly is usually nonspecific and may reflect only the pectus excavatum, but aortic regurgitation from annuloaortic ectasia and mitral regurgitation from prolapsing mitral leaflets are common conditions that pathologically enlarge the heart. On the lateral film, a pectus excavatum is frequently identified as well as a narrow thoracic diameter.

Marfan patients without symptoms are easily observed with serial MRI every 6 to 12 months. Surgical referral is usually undertaken if a previously stable aortic aneurysm begins to enlarge or if the aortic arch and descending aorta exceed a diameter of 5 cm. MRI allows detection of the onset of annuloaortic ectasia (Fig. 11-22) with dilatation of the aortic root and ascending aorta, and visualization of a dissection. Aortic regurgitation can be observed and quantified with velocity-encoded pulse sequences. Observations on the aortic root and quantification of aortic regurgitation can also be made by echocardiography.

Aortography is usually reserved for urgent clinical situations in which noninvasive imaging was inconclusive. Some surgeons request coronary angiography to evaluate whether a dissection extends near or into the coronary arteries. Occasionally, aortography can identify an entry site of a dissection that is not apparent on other methods (Fig. 11-23).

Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysms

Etiology

Dilatation of one or all of the sinuses of Valsalva may be associated with abnormalities in the aortic valve or the aorta. These aneurysms may be classified radiologically as discrete (localized to the sinuses) or annuloaortic (involving both the aortic root and the ascending aorta). The classic type is annuloaortic ectasia with a pear-shaped configuration of the aortic root and equal dilatation of all sinuses.

An outline of sinus of Valsalva aneurysms is presented in Box 11-4. Discrete aneurysms that involve a single sinus are usually congenital (Fig. 11-24), although rarely dilatation of two or all three sinuses may also be congenital. These are generally less than 4 cm in diameter and involve mainly the right sinus. The tissue in the aortic annulus adjacent to the leaflet histologically has sparse fibroelastic elements and grossly may have fenestrations through the cusp. A sinus of Valsalva aneurysm can develop as a consequence of a ventricular septal defect. One of the ways a ventricular septal defect can close spontaneously is to form fibrous tissue around its edges. As the membranous ventricular septal defect becomes smaller, the adjacent leaflet of the aortic valve is pulled inferiorly into the defect. The clinical consequence of the developing leaflet prolapse is that the left-to-right shunt through the ventricular septal defect is transformed to that of aortic regurgitation.

Acquired discrete aneurysms usually involve all three sinuses if they are a consequence of a generalized inflammatory process, for example, syphilis or an immune complex aortitis. Aortic root abscesses are actually false aneurysms since they erode through the aorta into cardiac or mediastinal tissue.

Because the sinuses of Valsalva lie completely within the cardiac silhouette (Fig. 11-25), the discrete type of aneurysm is not visible on the plain chest film. If the ascending aorta is also dilated, the right side of the mediastinum will have the characteristic convexity of the aorta as it extends into the adjacent lung.

Complications

Aortic regurgitation is the main complication of progressive dilatation of the aortic annulus and the resultant lack of coaptation of the leaflets. Any type of sinus of Valsalva aneurysm can rupture into an adjacent structure. The onset is abrupt with severe aortic regurgitation or a torrential left-to-right shunt. Most sinus aneurysms rupture into the right sinus; they perforate anteriorly into the right ventricular outflow tract, dissect into the ventricular septum, or perforate posteriorly in the right atrium. Aneurysms of the noncoronary sinus rupture into the right atrium. Rupture of the left sinus into the left atrial appendage is extremely rare. When an aneurysm ruptures, aortography shows contrast medium entering the cardiac chamber and opacifying downstream structures on subsequent films (Fig. 11-26). Both a left ventriculogram and an aortogram may be necessary to distinguish a ventricular septal defect with aortic regurgitation from a ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm. The contrast in the right ventricle from an aortogram could have passed into the left ventricle from aortic regurgitation and then across a ventricular septal defect, or it could have flowed directly from the aorta through the rupture into the right ventricle.

Because an aneurysm of the right sinus of Valsalva can compress and distort adjacent structures, significant hemodynamic complications can occur as the aneurysm dilates. Right coronary artery compression, superior vena cava obstruction, right ventricular outflow obstruction, and endocarditis can produce dramatic clinical events.

Aortitis

A number of clinical syndromes have vasculitis that involves the aorta. Most of these diseases are either associated with or caused by immune complexes deposited in the vessel wall. Intimal proliferation and fibrosis, degeneration of the elastic fibers, round cell infiltration, and occasionally giant cells usually allow a specific histologic diagnosis. The gross changes, except in Takayasu disease, are far less specific, regrettably so because these are the features seen on angiography and cross-sectional imaging. Aortitis produces aneurysms in many portions of the aorta and its related branches. They are usually fusiform but occasionally saccular. Takayasu disease is the only aortitis that produces stenoses in the thoracic aorta. Significant stenoses in the aortic arch are well known in the acquired disease: aortic dissection, false aneurysms from laceration of the aortic arch after a motor vehicle accident, infected aortic aneurysms with abscess formation, Behçet’s disease, and rarely atherosclerotic and syphilitic disease.

Dilatation of the ascending aorta is one of the earliest signs of aortitis, but it is not specific for aortitis because systemic hypertension and aortic valve disease also widen the aorta.

Takayasu Aortitis

Takayasu was a Japanese ophthalmologist who in 1908 described a woman with an unusual arteriovenous network in the retina. Similar findings and absence of peripheral pulses have given this disease the names pulseless disease, aortic arch syndrome, middle aortic syndrome, occlusive thromboaortopathy, and atypical coarctation.

Classifications

There are four types of Takayasu aortitis (Fig. 11-27). The Shimizu-Sano or type 1 is characterized by stenoses throughout the aortic arch and the innominate, carotid, and subclavian arteries. Type 2, or Kimoto type, shows segmental stenoses in the descending thoracic and abdominal aortas, including in the renal arteries. The Inada, or type 3, includes stenoses of both the aortic arch and the distal thoracic and abdominal aorta. Pulmonary artery stenoses with any aortic involvement define the disease as type 4. The most prevalent type of Takayasu disease is type 3 (55%), followed by type 2 (11%) and type 1 (8%). About half of these patients have pulmonary stenoses. Aortic regurgitation is usually mild, although it may occasionally be severe.

Imaging Assessment

Because of its diffuse and widespread nature, you may need both MRI and angiography to assess the extent and severity of Takayasu aortitis. Biplane thoracic aortograms or gradient echo MRI will detect aortic regurgitation and aortic arch stenosis (Figures 11-28, 11-29, 11-30). Abdominal aortography or magnetic resonance angiography will outline renal artery involvement and evaluate the arteries to the legs and gastrointestinal tract (Fig. 11-31). Occasionally, you will need angiography and ventilation-perfusion scans to assess pulmonary involvement. Conventional CT and CT angiography are useful in disease diagnosis (Fig. 11-32).

The earliest change seen on the angiogram is an irregularity or narrowing of the aortic lumen even though there is no pressure gradient. MRI frequently shows a thickened aortic wall (Fig. 11-33). More severe stenoses have collateral circulation with reconstitution of distal vessels. Associated aneurysms may be either saccular or fusiform and show an irregular dilatation of a long segment of the aorta. A distal stenosis in the aorta may secondarily produce proximal aortic dilatation, so it may be difficult to distinguish a concomitant aortitis of the proximal aorta from secondary dilatation of a normal aortic wall as a result of a more distal stenosis.

Other Types of Aortitis

Inflammation of the media and adventitia is common in the acute phase in all types of aortitis. As healing progresses, the damaged tissue is replaced by collagen. The collagen forms part of the scar, retracts, crinkling the intima, and creates the “tree bark” appearance of the luminal surface of the aorta seen in all types of aortitis. Much later, superimposed atherosclerosis and degenerative calcification represent the end stage of the inflammatory process.

From an imaging perspective, the aorta dilates in response to the weakened structural support of its wall (Fig. 11-34). As a rule, the ascending aorta dilates more than the arch, and the abdominal aorta is little involved (the opposite of atherosclerosis). As healing progresses, the aortic wall may become quite thick (Fig. 11-35). Aortic rupture can occur as a consequence of any type of aortic dilatation from aortitis. Aortic regurgitation mainly is from dilatation of the aortic annulus, but there may be inflammatory valvulitis and bacterial endocarditis. As listed in Box 11-5, giant cell arteritis, ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, the aortitis associated with rheumatic fever, relapsing polychondritis, Reiter syndrome, and syphilis all may produce aortic regurgitation and dilatation of the ascending aorta and arch. The aorta may be involved in the collagen diseases of systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, and rarely in ulcerative colitis or psoriasis. Although these entities pathologically and clinically are rather specific, the major angiographic finding is fusiform and symmetric dilatation of the aorta.

Ankylosing Spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis affects that portion of the aorta behind the sinuses of Valsalva (Fig. 11-36). The process extends downward to the aortic cusps, which becomes thickened, and upward a few centimeters in the ascending aorta. Ankylosing spondylitis is one kind of severe aortitis that crosses the distinct junction of the sinotubular ridge as it dilates the aortic root and ascending aorta. In contrast to syphilis, the scarring process in ankylosing spondylitis involves the sinuses of Valsalva, both the free edge and the base of the aortic leaflets, and extends below the aortic valve to the mitral annulus. In syphilis, the scarring begins above the sinuses of Valsalva and only the free edge of the aortic valve is thickened and curled.

Cardiovascular Syphilis

The hallmark of cardiovascular syphilis is aortitis, which is the consequence of spirochete infection of the aortic media with subsequent inflammation and scarring. Later, focal medial necrosis ensues, along with intimal fibrous proliferation. In this late phase, there are no spirochetes but scarring of the aortic wall and loss of elastic tissue produce a weakness in the wall, which is (paradoxically) quite thick. Superimposed on the intima is severe atherosclerosis with plaques and calcification. Both the incidence and severity of aortitis are greatest in the ascending aorta, followed by the arch, the descending aorta, and rarely, the upper abdominal aorta. This distribution differs from pure atherosclerosis, in which the lower abdominal aorta is most likely to be severely affected.

The aortitis of syphilis characteristically involves the ascending aorta and begins above the sinotubular ridge. The sinotubular ridge is preserved and does not dilate. The diagnosis of aortitis rests on two signs: calcification and dilatation. Calcification, which occurs in about 25% of those with luetic aortitis, is initially thin with sharp margins. Later, when severe atherosclerosis has developed, there are larger, irregular chunks of calcium. The calcification tends to occur along the anterolateral wall of the aorta, but in later stages involves the entire circumference (Fig. 11-38). Calcification of the ascending aorta is also seen in pure atherosclerosis, and rarely, in Takayasu arteritis so that neither its presence nor absence is diagnostic. However, a densely calcified ascending aorta from the sinuses of Valsalva to the arch vessels is typical of the severe, superimposed atherosclerosis of cardiovascular syphilis.

Aortic aneurysm occurs in about half of patients with cardiovascular syphilis and is mainly found in the thoracic aorta (Fig. 11-39). Counting multiple aneurysms, approximately 50% occur in the ascending aorta, 30% in the arch, 15% in the descending aorta, and less than 5% in the abdominal aorta. These aneurysms may rupture into or compress the adjacent superior vena cava, bronchi, esophagus, pulmonary artery, and pleural and pericardial cavities. The sinuses of Valsalva may be the site of syphilitic aneurysms either with primary involvement or with extension of the dilated ascending aorta. In contrast to sinus dilatation from cystic medial necrosis, luetic involvement of the sinuses may be eccentric. Although the shape of the aneurysms is unpredictable, they tend to be eccentric and saccular. In the series of Steinberg and colleagues, of 60 luetic aneurysms, 43 (72%) were saccular, and 17 (28%) had fusiform dilatation.

Aortic regurgitation is the most frequent complication of syphilitic aortitis, occurring in 60% of those with cardiovascular syphilis. The edges of the leaflets are also thickened and do not coapt, but calcification of the leaflets usually does not occur unless there is concomitant rheumatic or atherosclerotic disease. Regurgitation can also result from dilatation of the aortic annulus with separation of the valve commissures. Although the aortic regurgitation may be mild to severe, aortic stenosis is not a feature of aortic valve disease.

Coronary artery ostial stenosis from syphilis does not extend into the coronary artery itself, but rather results from abundant intimal thickening in the sinuses of Valsalva. In Heggtveit’s series 26% of the patients had luetic coronary ostial stenosis. These stenoses may produce myocardial ischemia but necropsy study shows little evidence that this occurs. Occasionally, the coronary arteries may be aneurysmal, a finding that may reflect the primary disease or the secondary aortic regurgitation.

Infected Aortic Aneurysms

In 1885, William Osler used the term mycotic aneurysm to describe an infectious process involving an arterial wall. This designation has been replaced by the term infected aneurysm to include organisms of both bacterial and fungal origin. Infected aneurysms occur in persons of all ages, although they are usually seen in adults. Aneurysms caused by bacterial infection in children are usually associated with an underlying congenital abnormality, such as coarctation of the aorta, Marfan syndrome, or sinus of Valsalva aneurysm. Such aneurysms can also arise in an aorta damaged by trauma, as from previous aortotomy or at the tip of an indwelling catheter. In adults, a predisposing condition is almost always present because aortic involvement is extremely rare in overwhelming septicemia. Bacterial endocarditis, occurring on a substrate of either congenital or rheumatic heart disease or intravenous drug addiction, is a predisposing factor. Vascular infection may also arise by contiguous spread from adjacent empyema or infected lymph nodes; this is the usual pathophysiology of a tuberculous aneurysm.

Because the shape, size, and location of an aneurysm are not specific for infection, any aneurysm is a candidate for the site of the infection in a patient with the clinical manifestations of a systemic infection. Several causative organisms are listed in Box 11-6. The most prevalent site of infected aneurysm is the femoral arteries, although infections are commonly located in the thoracic and abdominal aorta. The most frequent location in the thorax is the lesser curvature of the aortic arch in the region of the ligamentum arteriosum. This type of aneurysm occurs at the junction of the aorta with a patent ductus arteriosus and at the site of a coarctation. In the latter case, the aneurysm is frequently located just distal to the coarctation because aneurysms occurring as part of the coarctation are proximal, and an aneurysm occurring in the poststenotic segment in the jet stream is prone to be infected. The aortic root is a common location for infection in patients with aortic valve disease. These aneurysms are located in the sinuses of Valsalva and extend outward into the adjacent mediastinum.

Abscesses in the valve ring within the myocardium are difficult to image (Fig. 11-40). These patients have active infective endocarditis on one or more valves, usually the aortic valve, and there is always valvular regurgitation. The angiographic detection depends on seeing the deformity of the valve ring or its displacement by the abscess cavity. In the aortic region, the valve ring abscess usually lies behind the aortic valve adjacent to the left atrium and mitral annulus (Fig. 11-41).

An infected aneurysm is usually saccular, although it may be any shape, including fusiform (Fig. 11-42). It may not be possible to distinguish between a saccular true aneurysm and a false aneurysm that has perforated into the mediastinum (Fig. 11-43). In the thorax, two thirds of these aneurysms are apparent on plain chest films that show mediastinal enlargement. Accessory findings include tracheal deviation and adjacent gas density. Infected aneurysms in the aortic root may be difficult to distinguish from the normal curvature of the sinuses of Valsalva. In these patients, a biplane aortography should be performed to search for the eccentric outpouching. Because of the adjacent inflammatory response, aortic root abscesses have a thick wall, which can be imaged with CT or MRI.

The natural history of infected aneurysms is expansion and subsequent rupture. Infections originating primarily in the mediastinum may rupture into adjacent structures, causing arteriovenous fistula or exsanguination into a bronchus. Rupture into the left pleural space occurs because of the left-sided descent of the descending aorta. A para-aortic mediastinal or pleural abscess may secondarily rupture into the aorta. One of the complications of a tuberculous lymph node is erosion into the aorta. Bone erosion of the anterior portion of the vertebral bodies and lateral displacement of the mediastinal lines are accessory signs of a chronic and slow-growing tuberculous aneurysm.

Thoracic Cardiovascular Trauma

Penetrating Wounds

Since ancient times, physicians have recognized penetrating wounds of the heart and great vessels. With early diagnosis and treatment, modern medical and surgical techniques have enabled some victims to survive injuries to the heart and aorta. The sequelae of penetrating wounds to the heart include cardiac tamponade, left-to-right shunts, usually between the ventricles, valve injuries, true and false ventricular aneurysms, coronary artery lacerations and occlusions, and retained foreign bodies. When there is emergency surgery for stab wounds to the heart, postoperative angiography may be necessary to check for unsuspected communications between chambers or to the great vessels. When the injury penetrates the anterior chest wall, it commonly punctures the right ventricle or left anterior descending coronary artery; the left ventricle, right atrium, and left atrium are less frequently harmed.

Penetrating trauma as a result of medical procedures or devices is becoming increasingly common with widespread use of indwelling intravenous and interarterial catheters, including the intraaortic balloon pump. Cardiac tamponade from perforation of the right ventricle by a pacing electrode is a recognized complication of cardiac pacing. Catheter fragments may migrate to a distal vascular bed and perforate the vessel wall to form a false aneurysm or cause an arterial dissection.

The purpose of imaging in evaluating penetrating cardiovascular trauma is severalfold:

The type of imaging performed in a trauma situation obviously depends on the clinical setting. In certain kinds of trauma, multiple vascular injuries are likely to be present, for example, with gunshot wounds and severe automobile accidents. In these situations, it is wise to consider the possibility of multiple cardiac and arterial injuries and to perform adequate imaging to delineate their extent.

Aortic Tears

Although the aorta may be torn in any location, in over 90% of nonpenetrating trauma patients who survive the point of the laceration is the isthmus. It is here that the relatively mobile ascending aorta and arch join the rigid descending aorta, which is fixed by the pleura, resulting in a plane of shear. The tears at the isthmus are usually transverse but are occasionally ragged or spiral. When the aorta is completely ruptured, the distal end may retract several centimeters so that the intervening vascular channel is composed entirely of periadventitial and pleural tissue (Fig. 11-44). Lesser injuries that may be imaged include intimal hemorrhage with laceration, and occasionally, intravascular thrombus attached to the isthmus.

A partial rupture will produce a false aneurysm that is eccentric and saccular. When the laceration is complete, a traumatic aortic rupture will appear as a fusiform aneurysm, in which case the bulge represents not the vessel wall but the retropleural and mediastinal containment of the false aneurysm. As with all false aneurysms, there is the potential to expand and rupture, a process that can happen quickly or extend over many years.

In the 10% of patients with traumatic rupture of the aorta from blunt trauma, the origins of the innominate, left carotid, or left subclavian arteries are injured, occasionally with other injury to the ascending aorta. The innominate artery injury may be a pseudoaneurysm at its origin or in its proximal segment. This artery may also be occluded, in which case collateral circulation comes from the circle of Willis and flows retrograde into the ipsilateral vertebral artery.

The imaging evaluation in the diagnosis of suspected aortic transection remains controversial even after hundreds of articles analyzing the role of the chest film, CT, transesophageal ultrasound, and angiography (Figures 11-45, 11-46, 11-47, 11-48). The imaging of each patient needs to be individualized according to the amount of trauma, the cardiovascular stability of the patient, and the medical resources available. Several guidelines appear to have reasonable reliability in the triage of patients with blunt chest injury. The chest film is a useful first step in mild trauma, in addition to identifying lung and musculoskeletal injuries, because if it is normal with no signs of mediastinal hemorrhage, then it is quite unlikely that an aortic tear is present. If, however, despite the negative chest film, the amount of trauma or its mechanism was potentially sufficient to tear the aorta, then CT or angiography is required for definitive diagnosis (Fig. 11-49). In like manner, normal findings on chest CT with intravenous contrast virtually exclude aortic injury. If the CT shows mediastinal widening or hemorrhage, the diagnostic possibilities are arterial injury, which requires surgery, or rupture of small mediastinal veins, which does not. In these instances, aortography, although not foolproof, is the accepted practice (Fig. 11-50).

Cardiac Injury

Blunt trauma to the heart and pericardium is seen indirectly on chest films with signs of cardiac tamponade and ventricular dysfunction (Box 11-7). An enlarging cardiac silhouette or pulmonary edema implies cardiac injury. In general, echocardiography and angiography are needed to analyze the site and physiologic extent of the trauma.

Damage to the cardiac valves occurs much less frequently with nonpenetrating chest trauma. The aortic valve may be disrupted along the base of the leaflets or by laceration of the middle or edge of a cusp (Fig. 11-51). Damage to the mitral and tricuspid valves is rare and is associated with varying degrees of leaflet stability, culminating in a flail leaflet when a papillary muscle is ruptured.

Myocardial ischemia after blunt trauma is a sign of coronary artery injury. The task of cardiac imaging is to distinguish among cardiac contusion, myocardial infarction from preexisting coronary artery disease, and direct traumatic injury to the coronary artery. Coronary arteriography may demonstrate normal coronary arteries, indicating that there is a contusion of the heart. There may be coronary tears, dissections, or extrinsic stenoses from an adjacent hematoma. When an artery is transected, the distal ends constrict in a natural attempt to reduce blood flow so that arteriographic visualization may be subtle. After injury to the coronary arteries, ventriculography may show abnormalities such as ventricular aneurysm, pseudoaneurysm, or papillary muscle dysfunction. After a penetrating injury, there may be arteriovenous fistulas, either to the adjacent coronary vein or into the coronary sinus, right atrium, or right ventricle.

Thoracic Atherosclerotic Aneurysms

Appearance

Atherosclerotic thoracic aneurysms can be either saccular or fusiform. The saccular variety involves expansion of only a portion of the wall and looks like an eccentric blister when viewed in tangent (Fig. 11-52). The most common type is the fusiform aneurysm in which the entire aortic segment is cylindrically dilated (Fig. 11-53). The thin wall of the aortic aneurysm may appear thick because of a laminated thrombus within the sac. The aortic lumen may not be dilated if the aneurysm contains an intraaneurysmal thrombus. In such cases, the correct diagnosis of thrombus in an aneurysm may hinge on locating intimal calcifications in the wall of the aorta, which is widely separated by thrombus from the apparent lumen or on finding an adjacent soft tissue mass that is concentric to the aneurysm.

Acute Aortic Syndrome

Aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating aortic ulcerations are potentially fatal disease processes that may often be clinically indistinguishable. These three pathologic processes comprise what is known as “acute aortic syndrome.” Pathologically, however, there are a few definable differences between the three. Aortic dissection can be seen in the setting of atherosclerotic disease; however, it is more often than not seen in aortas that are free of significant atherosclerotic disease. Penetrating aortic ulcers occur mostly in the setting of extensive atherosclerotic disease. Both aortic ulceration and dissection can and often do have evidence of aortic wall hematoma. Both intramural hematomas and penetrating aortic ulcers have been described as variants of true aortic dissection. The difference between intramural hematoma in the setting of aortic dissection or penetrating aortic ulcer and intramural hematoma as distinct pathologic findings is the presence or absence of an intimal flap. A true intramural hematoma occurs without radiographic evidence of an intimal flap.

These lesions often occur in similar locations and patients who present with these processes clinically tend to be hypertensive. Making the appropriate diagnosis is important because the risk of rupture is significantly higher in patients with a penetrating ulcer or intramural hematoma than in patients with classic aortic dissection.

Table 11-2 lists characteristics of different imaging modalities in the setting of acute aortic syndrome. Table 11-3 lists clinical and diagnostic findings of the three pathologic processes that comprise acute aortic syndrome.

TABLE 11-2 Imaging modality characteristics for acute aortic syndrome

Modality Advantages Disadvantages
Chest radiograph Easily performed Low sensitivity
Low specificity
Cardiac-gated multidetector computed tomography High sensitivity and specificity
Rapid scan and interpretation
Multiplanar images
High radiation dose
Large contrast dose
Angiography High sensitivity and specificity for aortic dissection and aneurysmal disease Invasive
Large contrast dose
Cannot diagnose intramural hematoma
Magnetic resonance imaging High sensitivity and specificity
Multiplanar images
Long scan times
Transesophageal echocardiography High specificity and sensitivity for ascending aortic injury and dissection Operator dependent

Penetrating Aortic Ulcer

One of the complications of atherosclerosis is development of a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer. Penetrating atherosclerotic ulceration of the thoracic aorta was first described in 1934. A cholesterol plaque in the lumen of the aorta ruptures, disrupting the internal elastic lamina, and subsequently dissects into the aortic media. The media layer is then exposed to pulsatile blood flow, resulting in an intramural hematoma and a variable degree of aortic dissection. The hematoma may penetrate the aortic wall and become contained by the adventitia. At this stage, the ulcer is considered a contained rupture or a pseudoaneurysm. Uncommonly, the aortic ulcer may perforate through the adventitia and rupture into the pleural space, resulting in a fistula into adjacent organs such as the esophagus or bronchus.

The presence of dissection in this process is not the same type of dissection seen in classical aortic dissection. In penetrating aortic ulcers, the flap is irregular and thick and does not significantly encroach on the true lumen of the aorta. The dissection also is limited in the extent of its course. The dissection is usually focal, whereas, in classic aortic dissection, the dissection plane often extends the entire length of the aorta. This focal and limited dissection may be secondary to scarring within the media as a result of atherosclerotic disease. Most penetrating aortic ulcers occur in the descending thoracic aorta in an area of severe atherosclerosis, although rarely they are present in the ascending aorta and in the abdominal aorta. Roughly 42% of patients with penetrating aortic ulcer also show evidence of abdominal aortic aneurysmal disease. Ulcers can occur in the ascending thoracic aorta, which may weaken the aortic wall resulting in disruption of the aortic valve and subsequent aortic regurgitation.

The clinical presentation is frequently that of a sudden onset of severe chest pain similar to that seen in myocardial infarction or aortic dissection. Characteristically, these patients are elderly and have diffuse arteriosclerosis and hypertension. Anterior chest pain tends to correlate with ascending aortic lesions, whereas descending aortic lesions usually cause back pain. Coronary artery disease, cerebral vascular disease, and peripheral vascular occlusions are common features. The differential diagnosis in this situation includes acute coronary syndromes, aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, true aortic aneurysm, pulmonary embolism, and penetrating ulcer of the aorta. With penetrating ulcer, there are few specific clinical signs; in particular, there is no pulse deficit, aortic regurgitation, stroke, or visceral vessel compromise. The presence of any of these suggests a classical dissection. A less common presentation is embolism of atheromatous debris or an overlying thrombus, resulting in ischemia and even infarction of downstream tissue. Examples of embolic disease are cerebrovascular accident and distal lower limb ischemia.

The chest film frequently shows diffuse or focal enlargement of the descending thoracic aorta with a widened mediastinum. If the aortic ulcer is leaking, there may be pleural effusions. To obtain a precise diagnosis, further imaging is required such as angiography, CT, MRI, or TEE. Contrast-enhanced, cardiac-gated multidetector CT is nearly 100% sensitive and specific for evaluating acute aortic syndrome. TEE is about 95% sensitive and specific for diagnosing acute aortic dissection, and intramural hematoma, and associated valvular regurgitation; however, this modality is operator dependent, and therefore accuracy in test performance and interpretation can vary. Penetrating ulceration may be more difficult to identify by TEE than by CT or MRI. Angiography has become less popular as a first-line investigation because of its invasive nature and because it may give rise to false-negative results if the ulcer is not profiled on the projections obtained. On CT, penetrating ulcers appear as focal excavation or crater within an area of mural thickening (Fig. 11-55). The aortic wall is frequently thickened, and there is inward and upward displacement of the calcified intima by the hematoma. Extensive adjacent calcification and ragged edges help to distinguish this entity from aortic dissection. Intravenous contrast may flow into a crescentic intramural hematoma, which can extend into the mediastinum.

Because multiple ulcers may be present, the entire aorta should be imaged. Imaging may also reveal pleural and pericardial fluid, mediastinal hematoma, or a pseudoaneurysm. The presence of a pleural effusion has been shown to be a risk factor for progression of the ulceration.

MRI may be the best modality for differentiating intramural hematoma from atherosclerotic plaque and chronic intramural thrombus. By MRI a subacute hematoma in the wall of the aorta demonstrates high signal intensity on both T1- and T2-weighted images. As the methemoglobin is further degraded and absorbed, the signal intensities will return to those of adjacent tissues (Fig. 11-56).

The natural history of penetrating aortic ulcers continues to emerge in the literature. Most penetrating ulcers are probably asymptomatic, with a small number causing a clinical problem. If the patient presents with pain, he or she is at significant risk of having or developing complications such as pseudoaneurysm or contained rupture, fistula or even free rupture. Over the next few days, the pain may resolve as the ulcer stabilizes. If the pain continues or recurs, this corresponds to progression of the pathologic process and the probable development of complications. If the pain subsides or complications have not occurred, the ulcer may remain unchanged for many years, although there is a possibility of aortic dilatation and aneurysm formation.

Management strategies may be divided into those for symptomatic and those for asymptomatic ulcer. Most diagnoses are made in the patient presenting acutely with chest or back pain. The patient should receive immediate intravenous analgesia to control pain and an antihypertensive agent to reduce blood pressure and so decrease the chance of rupture. Patients with penetrating ulcer of the descending aorta or arch should be considered a high-risk group and early operative repair has been recommended to prevent rupture.

If pain resolves with medical therapy alone and there is no radiographic evidence of deterioration, conservative management may be recommended. If this is adopted, oral antihypertensive therapy should continue, if appropriate, and imaging should be repeated within a few weeks to detect any silent progression of the disease. If the patient with a descending thoracic ulcer develops features of progression, early intervention is indicated. Such features include hemodynamic instability, persisting or recurrent pain, and radiological evidence of deterioration (intramural hematoma expansion, pseudoaneurysm formation, pericardial effusion, or bloody pleural effusion). Embolization from a penetrating ulcer is also considered to be an indication for repair.

Therapeutic options for penetrating ulcers have primarily been open surgical repair, which requires local excision of the ulcer and graft interposition. Over the past decade, there has been a rapid surge in the use of endovascular stent grafts to treat a variety of aortic diseases, including abdominal and thoracic aneurysms. The use of stent graft for aortic ulcers was first described by Dake and colleagues in 1994. For there to be successful exclusion of a penetrating ulcer from the circulation, there must be an adequate length of normal aorta above and below the lesion for the proximal and distal ends of the stent graft to obtain secure purchase. The ulcer, therefore, must not be directly adjacent to the left subclavian artery or the celiac axis. If the ulcer lies within an aneurysm, there must be sufficient proximal and distal aneurysm neck for the stent to fasten to without impinging on these vessels. Early first-generation endovascular devices suffered from complications such as stroke with insertion, ascending aortic dissection or aortic penetration from their metal struts, vascular injury, graft collapse, endovascular leaks, graft material failure, continued aneurysm expansion or rupture, and endograft migration or kinking. Newer devices have been considerably improved. Long-term durability is still not well known, particularly in younger patients. The long-term consequences of repeated radiation exposure received during follow up CT scans to evaluate device integrity and positioning remains a concern in all patients.

Intramural Hematoma

Intramural hematoma of the thoracic aorta is a disease entity that is separate from classic aortic dissection and penetrating aortic ulcers. Aortic intramural hematoma was first described by Krukenberg in 1920 as a “dissection without intimal tear.” CT and MRI findings of this condition were first described in 1988 by Yamada. The overall incidence of intramural hematoma in patients with aortic dissection, from autopsy reports, has ranged from 4% to 13%.

Intramural hematoma is characterized as a concentric aortic wall hematoma without radiographic evidence of an intimal flap or penetrating ulceration. The hematoma is usually located within the media of the aortic wall. Like penetrating ulcers, it is most often found in the descending thoracic aorta. The hematoma may be secondary to hemorrhage, without intimal disruption, from the aortic vasa vasorum as seen in patients with cystic medial necrosis. A true intramural hematoma occurs in absence of identifiable penetrating aortic ulcer (Fig. 11-57). It can, however, be secondary to rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque/ulcer that penetrates into the internal elastic lamina and allows subsequent hematoma formation within the media of the aortic wall (Fig. 11-58). A subacute hematoma in the wall of the aorta can be characterized with MRI by high signal intensity on both T1- and T2-weighted images.

The clinical presentation of intramural hematoma is similar to both penetrating aortic ulceration and classic aortic dissection. As with penetrating aortic ulcer and aortic dissection, intramural hematoma with uncontrollable pain is a significant indicator of disease progression. Numerous reports indicate that both intramural hematomas and penetrating aortic ulcers commonly occur in elderly patients with a history of hypertension. The mean age of these patients is older than that of those with classic aortic dissection. The Stanford classification for aortic dissection has been applied to intramural hematoma because of the prognostic implications secondary to location have been found similar to those of classic aortic dissection.

A prognostic indicator in intramural hematoma is the presence or absence of aortic ulcers. Ganaha and colleagues recently demonstrated significant progression of disease in patients with both intramural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer. Prognosis of acutely symptomatic hospitalized patients with penetrating aortic ulcers is worse than those with classic aortic dissection because of a higher incidence of aortic rupture. Therefore, patients with both intramural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer must be considered to be clinically critical.

Patients demonstrate a relatively stable clinical course when there is no penetrating aortic ulcer associated with intramural hematoma, and it is confined to the descending thoracic aorta. In patients with type B, descending aorta involvement, intramural hematoma can be managed conservatively in the absence of disease progression. Oral beta-blocker therapy may improve long-term prognosis of intramural hematoma regardless of anatomical location. Regardless of the aortic diameter, type A intramural hematoma, involving the ascending aorta, is at high risk for early progression, and surgical intervention is therefore recommended.

CONGENITAL ANOMALIES

The thoracic aorta and the branches from the aortic arch have many common variants. Most of these anomalies, including a mirrorimage right aortic arch, produce no clinical symptoms. Aortic arch vascular malformations produce two types of symptom:

A vascular ring is formed if the trachea and esophagus are encircled by the aortic arch and its ductus arteriosus and branches. All of these anomalies are rare but a few of the more common variations will be reviewed.

The imaging evaluation of a suspected vascular ring begins with a chest film and a barium esophagogram. The right aortic arch is easily identified on adult chest films. A posterior indentation of the barium-filled esophagus at the level of the aortic arch suggests a retroesophageal vascular structure. A small imprint implies a retroesophageal subclavian artery and a larger impression is the aorta between the esophagus and spine. Double aortic arch usually has a higher and larger impression on the right side of the esophagus compared with the smaller and inferior left-sided convexity. Most complex arch anomalies require cross-sectional imaging or angiography to map the entire anomaly before surgery. These anomalies can be difficult to analyze and frequently require multiple projections. With angiography, cranially angled oblique views will project the ductus below the aortic arch. With MRI, coronal, axial, and oblique views in the plane of the aorta are needed to trace each vascular structure through the mediastinum in relation to the trachea.

Left Aortic Arch

There are many normal variations of the origins of the aortic arch arteries. The right and left carotid arteries, the right and left subclavian arteries, and the left vertebral artery can all originate separately from the aortic arch or be joined or originate with their nearest neighbor. An aberrant right subclavian artery is seen in about 1% of persons and usually goes behind the esophagus but may pass between the esophagus and trachea or may go anterior to the trachea (Figures 11-59, 11-60). The origin of the right subclavian artery, if it is dilated, is called a diverticulum of Kommerell (Fig. 11-61).

The aortic diverticulum is on the inferior curvature of the aortic arch in the isthmus (Fig. 11-62). In the embryo, the right side of the double aortic arch rejoins the left arch to form the descending aorta. The aortic diverticulum is the obliterated end of the right arch. A ductus diverticulum is the obliterated aortic end of the ductus arteriosus. These diverticula may enlarge and be confused with an aortic aneurysm or a traumatic laceration.

Right Aortic Arch

The right aortic arch passes to the right side of the trachea and esophagus and usually recrosses to the left side posteriorly in the middle of the thorax behind the right pulmonary artery to descend into the abdomen on the left side. If the heterotaxia syndrome is present, the aortic arch may continue on the right side into the abdomen.

Mirror-image branching from a right aortic arch is almost always associated with congenital heart disease. The order of origin of the branches is typically a left brachiocephalic artery, right carotid artery, and right subclavian artery (Fig. 11-63). The ductus arteriosus goes from the left subclavian artery to the left pulmonary artery in front of the trachea and does not cause a vascular ring. About 25% to 50% of patients with truncus arteriosus have a right aortic arch with mirror-image branching, and about 25% with tetralogy of Fallot have this type of right aortic arch. A rare variation of mirror-image branching with right aortic arch has an aortic diverticulum behind the esophagus, which connects with the left ductus arteriosus, completing the vascular ring.

The most common type of right aortic arch has an aberrant retroesophageal left subclavian artery (Fig. 11-64). If a left ductus connects this left subclavian artery to the left pulmonary artery, a vascular ring is formed. Although there is a potential for compression of the trachea and esophagus if a left ductus persists, most patients are asymptomatic. The incidence of congenital heart disease with this type of right arch is less than 2%.

An unusual right aortic arch anomaly has a stenosis in the left subclavian artery. The left subclavian artery may arise from the left pulmonary artery (isolation of the left subclavian artery) or may have a stenosis near the aortic diverticulum (Fig. 11-65).

A right aortic arch is identified on the chest film as a right paratracheal mass that displaces both the trachea and the esophagus leftward (Fig. 11-66). The barium-filled esophagus is displaced anteriorly on the lateral film if there is an aberrant left subclavian artery. The para-aortic stripe in the upper middle mediastinum is present on the right side and absent on the left. In the lower thorax above the diaphragm the aorta crosses to the left side and the left para-aortic stripe again becomes visible. On CT and MRI the aortic arch arteries can be traced from their origins to map their position in relation to the trachea and esophagus (Fig. 11-67).

Double Aortic Arch

The ascending aorta may split into right and left aortic arches, which pass on both sides of the trachea to join posteriorly behind the esophagus (Fig. 11-68). In most cases, the right arch is larger and higher than the left arch (Fig. 11-69). Although double aortic arch is rarely associated with congenital heart disease, there is frequently compression and malacia of the trachea. The plain chest film may show bilateral paratracheal masses with compression of the intervening trachea. A barium esophagogram shows bilateral indentations by the two aortic arches along the lateral sides of the esophagus with the right side superior and larger than the left side.

The angiographic picture of a double aortic arch is an “Aunt Mary.” The characteristic double-looped aorta is visualized with either a left ventriculogram or aortogram (Fig. 11-70). MRI is more complex but also shows the heart and mediastinal structures (Figures 11-71, 11-72).

Pulmonary Artery Sling

Aberrant origin of the left pulmonary artery from the right pulmonary artery is part of an unusual anomaly in which the left pulmonary artery passes between the trachea and the esophagus (Figures 11-73, 11-74, 11-75, 11-76). The diagnosis can occasionally be made on a lateral chest film taken during a barium swallow so that the aberrant left pulmonary artery is a mass between the trachea and the esophagus. Most patients have cardiovascular and tracheoesophageal anomalies. The major respiratory abnormality is usually a significant stenosis in the right main stem bronchus and the tracheal bifurcation. In the compressed trachea and bronchus, the cartilage may be formed abnormally because that segment of the bronchus usually remains stenotic even after surgical relocation of the aberrant pulmonary artery. The radiologic features of air trapping from the stenotic bronchus include an opaque right upper lobe caused by poor clearing of fetal fluid and lobar emphysema with a hyperlucent right or left lung.

Coarctation of the Aorta

In 1791, Paris delivered a paper on the pathology of coarctation. Although the clinical and pathologic signs of collateral flow in coarctation were known in the 19th century, the radiologic recognition of rib notching and the abnormal mediastinal silhouette were not firmly established until nearly 30 years after the first chest films were taken. In 1928, Abbott described the rib notching from enlarged intercostal vessels and the size discrepancy between the aortic arch and the descending aorta at the level of the left subclavian artery. Some of the first angiographic examinations were performed for coarctation in 1941.

Classification

There are numerous classifications of coarctation based on the age of the patient, the position of a patent ductus arteriosus in relation to the coarctation, and the length of the coarctation. Most of these schemata, including the classification into infantile or adult types, have limited usefulness in patient management because there is great variability within the categories, and the adult type of coarctation is frequently present in infants. Preductal and postductal coarctation are meaningful if the ductus is patent. Box 11-8 is a useful list of imaging observations that includes ductal patency, extent of collaterals, aortic arch anomalies, and coarctation in unusual locations.

Characteristics

The typical coarctation occurs in the aortic isthmus. This segment of the aorta between the origin of the left subclavian artery and the ductus is normally slightly small in the fetus and newborn. The fetal configuration of the isthmus produces a diameter that is roughly three quarters of the diameter of the descending thoracic aorta. Three months after birth, the fetal configuration of the isthmus is gone and the aortic arch has the same diameter throughout. The coarctation consists of an obstructing membrane on the greater curvature of the aorta opposite the ductus or ligamentum arteriosum. Typically, the lesser curvature of the aorta, which includes the site of the ductus, is retracted medially toward the left pulmonary artery. Beyond the obstruction there is usually a short segment that is dilated and may rarely be aneurysmal. The aorta proximal to the coarctation may be enlarged, either congenitally or from hypertension. The dilatation may include the innominate, carotid, and subclavian vessels. More than half have tubular hypoplasia of the transverse portion of the aortic arch, beginning after the innominate artery and ending at the coarctation. In this configuration, the innominate, carotid, and subclavian arteries are dilated and may be as large as the transverse aortic arch.

The position of a patent ductus arteriosus with respect to the coarctation affects both the clinical presentation and the imaging interpretation. A ductus arteriosus may originate proximal, distal, or adjacent to a coarctation. If the coarctation is distal to the ductus arteriosus, blood flow is initially from the aorta to the pulmonary arteries in a left-to-right direction. If later the pulmonary vascular resistance increases because of an Eisenmenger reaction, the shunt may become bidirectional or reversed. If the coarctation is proximal to the ductus arteriosus, flow through the ductus will depend on the size of the ductus and the difference between the pulmonary and systemic vascular resistances. In this situation, the blood flow is frequently from the pulmonary artery to the descending aorta, a state that produces cyanosis in the lower half of the body. Oxygenated blood from the left ventricle goes to the aortic arch arteries, whereas deoxygenated blood from the right ventricle goes through the ductus to the lower body. A juxtaductal coarctation produces a complex pattern of blood flow, which may vary dynamically as the pulmonary and systemic vascular resistances change with daily activity.

Stenosis or the anomalous origin of a subclavian artery distal to the coarctation results in an inequality in pulses and blood pressures in the two arms. A rare condition that produces equal blood pressures in both arms is the anomalous origin of both subclavian arteries below the coarctation. Coarctation at multiple sites or in the distal thoracic and abdominal aorta probably represents an embryologically different malformation, such as neurofibromatosis, or an acquired disease such as Takayasu aortoarteritis. Mucopolysaccharidosis (Hurler and Scheie syndromes) may have long tubular segmental stenoses in the aorta resembling those seen in Takayasu disease.

Congenital bicuspid aortic valve is frequently associated with coarctation. Between a quarter and half of the patients with aortic coarctation also have a bicuspid aortic valve. Anomalies associated with aortic coarctation are listed in Box 11-9.

Fatal complications of aortic coarctation include bacterial aortitis at the site of the coarctation, aortic dissection, aneurysm of the ductus with rupture, and distal thromboembolism. Fatal left ventricular failure may occur from hypertensive heart disease or from stenosis and regurgitation of a bicuspid aortic valve. Because the carotid arteries are hypertensive, aneurysms in the circle of Willis may develop and rupture.

Chest Film Abnormalities

Plain film findings have their angiographic counterpart and are particularly useful in searching for the extent of collateral supply. The thoracic aorta shows an abnormal contour on the chest film in roughly 60% of patients with coarctation. The “figure 3 sign” is the undulation in the distal aortic arch at the site of the coarctation (Fig. 11-77). The distal convexity in this region represents the poststenotic dilatation. There is considerable variability in the size of the ascending aorta and in the upper half of the figure 3 sign. The ascending aorta may be large, normal, or invisible on the chest film, reflecting the wide morphologic variety of aortic coarctation. Because the left subclavian artery dilates in response to the hypertension on the proximal side of the coarctation, this vessel is frequently visible as it swings from the mediastinum toward the apex of the left lung.

Rib notching is the result of enlarged and tortuous intercostal arteries that serve as collateral channels. The notches are an exaggeration of the neurovascular groove in the inferior aspect of the rib (Fig. 11-78). The degree of notching ranges from minimal undulations, which are variations of normal findings without coarctation, to deep ridges in the inferior rib margin. A small notch near the costovertebral joint is normal, so that the more lateral the notching, the more likely it is to be pathologic. Rarely, the intercostal artery is so tortuous that it notches the superior aspect of the adjacent inferior rib. Rib notching is uncommon before the age of 6 years, and its frequency increases with age, so most adults have this sign. The notching may occur at scattered sites and is usually not present on all ribs. After surgical repair of the coarctation, rib notching regresses as the bone is remodeled and the collateral vessels become smaller.

The intercostal arteries that serve as collateral channels originate from the descending aorta. For this reason, the first and second ribs do not have notches because their intercostal arteries come from the superior intercostal artery, which originates from the subclavian artery, above the coarctated site. Unilateral rib notching implies the presence of an anomalous subclavian artery. Notching of the left ribs only occurs when an aberrant right subclavian artery originates below the coarctated segment. Unilateral notching of the right ribs exists when the coarctation originates between the left carotid and left subclavian arteries. The size and extent of the notching reflects the amount of collateral blood flow through the intercostal arteries. When the coarctation is mild, no notching may be present; conversely, severe stenosis in the adult almost always has some element of rib notching.

In infancy, the abnormal mediastinal contours are invisible because of the overlying thymus. The typical chest film displays signs of congestive heart failure with a large cardiac silhouette and perihilar pulmonary edema (Fig. 11-79). The extent of both of these findings depends on the severity of the coarctation and the patency of the ductus arteriosus. A barium esophagogram may be useful to outline the medial side of the aorta. The barium in the esophagus, when fully distended, has a reversal of the figure 3 sign. The sharp lateral outpouching represents the site of the coarctation and the inferior area of constriction represents the poststenotic dilatation of the aorta.

Imaging Examination

In the infant, most coarctations are easily seen with ultrasound. In the suprasternal plane, echodense tissue narrows the aortic isthmus from its posterior aspect. Continuous wave Doppler beam interrogation allows calculation of the pressure gradient across the stenosis.

MRI is the preferred vascular study in older children and adults because it has no ionizing radiation and can image long segments of the aorta (Fig. 11-80). Because the stenosis typically is severe and the aorta tortuous at the poststenotic segment, the technique must be tailored to the pathologic findings. Slice thickness should be about 5 mm. The coronal plane images are useful to show the extent and size of collaterals. A multislice series then is designed from the axial stack to obtain a series of oblique images parallel to the long axis of the aorta centered on the coarctated segment (Fig. 11-81). Gradient echo sequences (Fig. 11-82) in the aortic plane can produce images similar to those of aortography. Visualization of a jet indicates a significant stenosis and pressure gradient across the coarctation. CT and CT angiography with multidetector technology and three-dimensional reformatting continue to rival the resolution of conventional catheter angiography (Fig. 11-83).

Aortography gives the highest resolution of the coarctated segment, the aortic arch vessels, and the flow through the collateral channels (Fig. 11-84). The catheter from the femoral artery can almost always be advanced through the coarctated segment with a guidewire and positioned in the ascending aorta. Retrograde flow of contrast material then outlines the aortic root and identifies any bicuspid aortic valve. The left anterior oblique projection with cranial angulation projects a ductus inferior to the aortic arch (Fig. 11-85). A delayed imaging sequence of up to 10 to 12 seconds is desirable to include late collateral opacification. At the conclusion of a retrograde aortogram, a measurement of the pressure gradient across the stenotic segment should be recorded. Box 11-10 lists the elements demonstrated in an aortogram.

The collateral circulation influences the extent of upper extremity hypertension and the amount of circulation to the lower half of the body. The major routes of collateral flow are through the subclavian arteries and through bridging collaterals in the mediastinum around the coarctated site. These routes vary considerably from patient to patient, even when the degree of coarctation is similar. Numerous bridging mediastinal vessels are frequent when other considerably longer pathways are poorly visualized.

A common collateral channel is for blood to flow from the subclavian arteries to the internal mammary arteries, then in a retrograde direction in the intercostal arteries to the descending aorta (Fig. 11-86). This pathway is responsible for the radiologic signs of large, undulating soft tissue in the retrosternal region on the lateral chest film and for the presence of rib notching. Obviously, if a subclavian artery originates anomalously in the low-pressure region below the coarctation, there will be no collateral flow in that side of the thorax. Another collateral pathway involves the thyrocervical and costocervical arteries, which originate from the subclavian artery. These vessels course through the scapular region to join intercostal arteries in the inferior thoracic region. Collateral pathways that are rarely seen on angiography include the superior and inferior epigastric arteries, which form a bridge from the intercostal arteries to the lumbar and iliac arteries, and the anterior spinal artery and other communicating arteries adjacent to the spinal cord.

The extent and size of the collateral channels that are angiographically visible roughly correspond to the age of the patient and the severity of the stenosis. Large and tortuous intercostal vessels are common in the adult but are rarely seen in infants. When the coarctation is distal to the ductus, collateral circulation forms during fetal life. Collateral circulation may be absent when the coarctation is proximal to the ductus.

Pseudocoarctation

Pseudocoarctation is a term used by Dotter and Steinberg to denote a lesion that has the same morphology as the classic coarctation but does not produce obstruction. This anomaly has a buckling of the aorta at the isthmus with little or no pressure gradient across it. All features of a true coarctation, including the figure 3 sign, may be seen in pseudocoarctation except that there is no rib notching or sign of collateral flow (Fig. 11-87). Coarctations that have a focal constriction of less than 50% have no pressure gradient across them and have no evidence of collateral flow (such as rib notching). The chest film has a mediastinal mass that is an elongated and high aortic arch. A gradient of less than 30 mm Hg is acceptable for the diagnosis of pseudocoarctation.

Pseudocoarctation may be two separate aortic anomalies. One type is a true coarctation without a pressure gradient. The embryologic abnormality that causes coarctation presumably had only a minor expression that produced the intimal infolding and distal dilatation (Fig. 11-88). The second type is an abnormal elongation of the thoracic aorta, which is kinked at the ligamentum attachment (Fig. 11-89).

Aortic Arch Interruption

Classifications

The site of the arch interruption determines classification into one of three types (Fig. 11-90). Type A has the interruption distal to the left subclavian artery. In a variation of this type, the right subclavian artery arises from the descending aorta or the pulmonary artery. In type B, the interruption is after the left common carotid artery (Fig. 11-91). The left subclavian artery arises from the descending aorta. This variety is the most common form of interrupted arch; its variations include forms in which the right subclavian artery comes from the right pulmonary artery via a right ductus and another variation in which the right subclavian artery connects to the descending aorta. Type C interruption is a discontinuity of the aortic arch distal to the innominate artery. The left carotid and left subclavian arteries connect to the descending aorta.

Imaging Examination

Because this is mostly a disease of neonates, echocardiography is the modality that ordinarily makes the diagnosis. The aortic arch assessed from the suprasternal area is scanned for continuity and for a large ductus arch.

The characteristic angiographic features depend on the anatomic type of interruption and the collateral flow to arteries not attached to the proximal aorta. In type A interruption with all brachiocephalic vessels arising from the ascending aorta, the angiographic appearance of these vessels resembles the letter V or W. There is a deep notch filled by the left lung between the large main pulmonary artery and the left subclavian artery. In type B interruption, the V configuration is formed by the two carotid arteries (Fig. 11-92).

Collateral circulation is identified by delayed filming and resembles that seen in aortic coarctation. With type A interruption and normal origin of the subclavian arteries, the collateral pathways are identical to aortic coarctation, particularly when the ductus is partly or completely closed. In older children, there may be bilateral rib notching. With type B interruption with the left subclavian artery connected to the descending aorta, collateral flow should promote rib notching only on the right side. A subclavian steal phenomenon may be visible with retrograde flow down the left vertebral artery to opacify the left subclavian artery. In a similar fashion, retrograde flow in any brachiocephalic artery may theoretically be visible if it attaches to the low-pressure side of the aortic interruption.

SUGGESTED READING

Berdon WE, Baker DH. Vascular anomalies and the infant lung: rings, slings, and other things. Semin Roentgenol. 1972;7:39-64.

Bissett GSIII, Strife JL, Kirks DR, et al. Vascular rings: MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 1987;149:251-256.

Cigarroa JE, Isselbacher EM, DeSanctis RW, et al. Medical progress. Diagnostic imaging in the evaluation of suspected aortic dissection: old standards and new directions. Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161:485-493.

DeSanctis RW, Doroghazi RM, Austen WG, et al. Aortic dissection. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1060-1067.

Dinsmore RE, Liberthson RR, Wismer GL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of thoracic aortic aneurysms: comparison with other imaging methods. Am J Roentgenol. 1986;146:309-314.

Doroghazi RM, Slater EE, editors. Aortic dissection. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983.

Dotter CT, Steinberg I. Angiocardiography in congenital heart disease. Am J Med. 1952;12:219-237.

Dotter CT, Steinberg I. The angiographic measurement of the normal great vessels. Radiology. 1949;52:353-358.

Fisher RG, Bladlock F, Ben-Menachem Y. Laceration of the thoracic aorta and brachiocephalic arteries by blunt trauma: report of 54 cases and review of the literature. Radiol Clin North Am. 1981;19:91-110.

Fisher RG, Chasen MH, Lamki N. Diagnosis of injuries of the aorta and brachiocephalic arteries caused by blunt chest trauma: CT vs aortography. Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:1047-1052.

Godwin JD, Turley K, Herfkens RJ, et al. Computed tomography for follow-up of chronic aortic dissections. Radiology. 1986;139:655-660.

Gomes AS, Lopis JF, George B, et al. Congenital abnormalities of the aortic arch: MR imaging. Radiology. 1987;165:691-695.

Groskin S, Maresca M, Heitzman ER. Thoracic trauma. In: McCort JJ, Mindelzun RE, editors. Trauma radiology. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1990.

Heggtveit HA. Syphilitic aortitis: a clinicopathologic autopsy study of 100 cases. Circulation. 1964;29:346-355.

Hilgenberg AD. Trauma to the heart and great vessels. In: Burke JF, Boyd RJ, McCabe CJ, editors. Trauma management: early management of visceral, nervous system, and musculoskeletal injuries. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1988:153-175.

Ishikawa K. Diagnostic approach and proposed criteria for the clinical diagnosis of Takayasu’s arteriopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:964-972.

Jaffee RB. Complete interruption of the aortic arch: 1. Characteristic radiographic findings in 21 patients. Circulation. 1975;52:714.

Jaffee RB. Complete interruption of the aortic arch: 2. Characteristic angiographic features with emphasis on collateral circulation of the descending aorta. Circulation. 1976;53:161-168.

Kampmeier RH. Saccular aneurysm of the thoracic aorta. A clinical study of 633 cases. Ann Intern Med. 1938;112:624.

Kazerooni EA, Bree RL, Williams DM. Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the descending thoracic aorta: evaluation with CT and distinction from aortic dissection. Radiology. 1992;183:759-765.

Kersteing-Sommerhoff BA, Higgins CB, White RD, et al. Aortic dissection: sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;166:651-655.

Kirks DR, Currarino G, Chen JT T. Mediastinal collateral arteries: important vessels in coarctation of the aorta. Am J Roentgenol. 1986;146:757-762.

Lande A, Berkmen YM, McAllister HAJr. Aortitis: clinical, pathologic, and radiographic aspects. New York: Raven Press, 1986.

Lande A. Takayasu’s arteritis and coarctation of the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta: a critical review. Am J Roentgenol. 1976;127:227-233.

Liberthson RR, Pennington DG, Jacobs M, et al. Coarctation of the aorta: review of 234 patients and clarification of management problems. Am J Cardiol. 1979;43:835-840.

Lindsay JJr, Hurst JW. The aorta. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1979.

Lindsey JJr. Diseases of the aorta. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1994.

Liu YQ. Radiology of aortoarteritis. Radiol Clin North Am. 1985;23:671-688.

Lupi-Herrera E, Sanchez-Torres G, Marcushamer J, et al. Takayasu’s arteritis. Clinical study of 107 cases. Am Heart J. 1977;93:94-103.

Macura KJ, Corl FM, Fishman EK, et al. Pathogenesis in acute aortic syndromes: aortic aneurysm leak and rupture and traumatic aortic transection. Am J Roentgenol. 2003:303-307.

Manghat NE, Morgan-Hughes GJ, Roobottom CA. Multi-detector row computed tomography: imaging in acute aortic syndrome. Clin Radiol. 2005;60:1256-1267.

Miller SW, Holmvang G. Differentiation of slow flow from thrombus in thoracic magnetic resonance imaging, emphasizing phase images. J Thorac Imaging. 1993;8:98-107.

Movsowitz HD, Lampert C, Jacobs LE, et al. Penetrating atherosclerotic aortic ulcers. Am Heart J. 1984;128:1210-1217.

Neye-Bock S, Fellows KE. Aortic arch interruption in infancy: radio- and angiographic features. Am J Roentgenol. 1980;135:1005-1010.

Park JH, Chung JW, Im JG, et al. Takayasu arteritis: evaluation of mural changes in the aorta and pulmonary artery with CT angiography. Radiology. 1995;196:89-93.

Park JH, Han MC, Bettmann MA. Arterial manifestations of Behçet disease. Am J Roentgenol. 1984;143:821-825.

Parmley LR, Thomas WM, Manion WC, et al. Nonpenetrating traumatic injury of the aorta. Circulation. 1985;15:405-410.

Petasnick JP. Radiologic evaluation of aortic dissection. Radiology. 1991;180:297-305.

Raptopoulos V. Chest CT for aortic injury: may be not for everyone. Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:1053-1055.

Roberts WC. Aortic dissection: anatomy, consequences, and causes. Am Heart J. 1981;101:195-214.

Shuford WH, Sybers RG. The aortic arch and its malformations: with emphasis on the angiographic features. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1974.

Simoneaux SE, Bank ER, Webber JB, et al. MR imaging of the pediatric airway. Radiographics. 1995;15:287-298.

Slater EE, DeSanctis RW. The clinical recognition of dissecting aortic aneurysm. Am J Med. 1976;60:625-633.

Smith AD, Schoenhagen P. CT imaging for acute aortic syndrome. Cleve Clin J Med. 2008;75:7-24.

Smyth PT, Edwards JE. Pseudocoarctation, kinking or buckling of the aorta. Circulation. 1972;46:1027-1032.

Soulen RL, Fishman EK, Pyeritz RE, et al. Marfan syndrome: evaluation with MR imaging versus CT. Radiology. 1987;165:697-701.

Steinberg I, Dotter CT, Peabody G, et al. The angiographic diagnosis of syphilic aortitis. Am J Roentgenol. 1949;62:655.

Steward JR, Kincaid OW, Edwards JE. An atlas of vascular rings and related malformations of the aortic arch. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1964.

Taylor DB, Blaser SI, Burrows PE, et al. Arteriopathy and coarctation of the abdominal aorta in children with mucopolysaccharidosis: imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:819-823.

Tunaci A, Berkman YM, Gökmen E. Thoracic involvement in Behçet’s disease: pathologic, clinical, and imaging features. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:51-56.

Vasile N, Matheier D, Keita K, et al. Computed tomography of thoracic aortic dissection: accuracy and pitfalls. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986;10:211-215.

Walker TG, Geller SC. Aberrant right subclavian artery with a large diverticulum of Kommerell: a potential for misdiagnosis. Am J Roentgenol. 1987;149:477-478.

White RD, Ullyot DJ, Higgins CB. MR imaging of the aorta after surgery for aortic dissection. Am J Roentgenol. 1988;150:87-92.

Yamada I, Numano F, Suzuki S. Takayasu arteritis: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology. 1993;188:89-94.

Yamada T, Tada S, Harada J. Aortic dissection without intimal rupture: diagnosis with MR imaging and CT. Radiology. 1988;168:347-352.

Yamato M, Lecky JW, Hiramatsu K, et al. Takayasu arteritis: radiographic and angiographic findings in 59 patients. Radiology. 1986;161:329-334.

Yao JS T, Pearce WH. Aneurysms: new findings and treatments. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange, 1994.

Yucel EK, Steinberg FL, Egglin TK, et al. Penetrating aortic ulcers: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology. 1990;177:779-781.