Sweat gland neoplasms

Published on 08/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Dermatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 5 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 2710 times

Chapter 5

Sweat gland neoplasms

Blue sweat gland tumors differentiate towards the secretory portion of the sweat gland. Red sweat gland tumors differentiate towards the sweat duct. Sweat duct tumors often demonstrate clear cell change. Most sweat gland tumors can show at least focal decapitation secretion, suggesting they are capable of apocrine differentiation.

Spiradenoma

Spiradenomas and cylindromas are closely related tumors. Both differentiate towards the secretory portion of the sweat gland. Hybrid tumors occur. Spiradenomas are usually sporadic and solitary, while cylindromas are multiple, inherited, and may occur together with trichoepitheliomas. Spiradenomas are inflamed (lymphocytes) and spontaneously tender.

Table 5-1

Characteristics of cylindroma versus spiradenoma

Characteristic Cylindroma Spiradenoma
Blue cells with little cytoplasm Yes Yes
Dark and pale blue nuclei Yes Yes
Peppered with black lymphocytes No Yes
Hyaline droplets in nests Yes Yes
Jigsaw-puzzle pattern Yes No
Deeply eosinophilic basement membrane Yes No
Inheritance Autosomal dominant Sporadic
Tender No Yes

Microcystic adnexal carcinoma

Microcystic adnexal carcinoma (MAC) typically presents as a firm plaque on the upper lip, medial cheek, or chin. Histologically, they have a paisley-tie appearance with dense red sclerotic stroma, and must be differentiated from syringoma, morpheaform basal cell carcinoma, and desmoplastic trichoepithelioma.

Table 5-2

Characteristics of microcystic adnexal carcinoma versus syringoma

Characteristic Microcystic adnexal carcinoma Syringoma
Paisley-tie pattern Yes Yes
Stroma Red, sclerotic Red, sclerotic
Horn cysts Common May occur
Size Large Small
Shape Infiltrative Round
Perineural extension Yes No
Basaloid islands +/− No
Clinical appearance Plaque on upper lip, cheek, chin Small papules on eyelids or eruptive papules

Table 5-3

Characteristics of microcystic adnexal carcinoma versus morpheaform basal cell carcinoma

Characteristic Microcystic adnexal carcinoma Morpheaform basal cell carcinoma
Paisley-tie pattern Throughout tumor Sometimes superficially
Stroma Red, sclerotic Red, sclerotic
Horn cysts Common Occasional
Deeply invasive Yes Yes
Perineural invasion Yes Yes
Clinical appearance Plaque on upper lip, cheek, chin Scar-like

Table 5-4

Characteristics of microcystic adnexal carcinoma versus desmoplastic trichoepithelioma

Characteristic Microcystic adnexal carcinoma Desmoplastic trichoepithelioma
Paisley-tie pattern Yes Yes
Stroma Red, sclerotic Red, sclerotic
Horn cysts Common Common
Calcification Rare Common
Lymphoid aggregates Typical Rare
Perineural extension Yes No
Central dell No Typical
Clinical appearance Plaque on upper lip, cheek, chin Firm doughnut

Mixed tumor (chondroid syringoma)

Branching alveolar type

While the small tubular type of chondroid syringoma differentiates towards the sweat duct, the branching alveolar type shows differentiation towards both the secretory segment and duct. Mucin within the stroma is sulfated, giving it a deep gray-blue cartilaginous hue.

Pearl

Metachromatic stains for mucin include toluidine blue, methylene blue, and Giemsa (methylene blue plus eosin). Alcian blue and colloidal iron are not metachromatic stains. Chondroitin sulfate stains with Alcian blue and toluidine blue at both high and low pH.

Acrospiromas

Acrospiromas comprise a large family of sweat gland tumors that includes poromas, hidradenomas, dermal duct tumors, and hidroacanthoma simplex. They are all composed of cells that resemble those of the acrosyringium. They all demonstrate duct differentiation within tumor islands. Hybrid forms are common.

Further reading

Duke, WH, Sherrod, TT, Lupton, GP. Aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinoma (aggressive digital papillary adenoma and adenocarcinoma revisited). Am J Surg Pathol. 2000; 24(6):775–784.

Fischer, S, Breuninger, H, Metzler, G, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: an often misdiagnosed, locally aggressive growing skin tumor. J Craniofac Surg. 2005; 16(1):53–58.

Halachmi, S, Lapidoth, M. Approach to the rare eccrine tumors. Dermatol Surg. 2011; 37(8):1194–1195.

Ishiko, A, Shimizu, H, Inamoto, N, et al. Is tubular apocrine adenoma a distinct clinical entity? Am J Dermatopathol. 1993; 15(5):482–487.

Komine, M, Hattori, N, Tamaki, K. Eccrine syringofibroadenoma (Mascaro): an immunohistochemical study. Am J Dermatopathol. 2000; 22(2):171–175.

Lago, EH, Piñeiro-Maceira, J, Ramos-e-Silva, M, et al. Primary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the skin. Cutis. 2011; 87(5):237–239.

Matin, RN, Gibbon, K, Rizvi, H, et al. Cutaneous mucinous carcinoma arising in extramammary Paget disease of the perineum. Am J Dermatopathol. 2011; 33(7):705–709.