Surgical Management of Lesions of the Clivus

Published on 13/03/2015 by admin

Last modified 13/03/2015

Print this page

This article have been viewed 8685 times

Chapter 41 Surgical Management of Lesions of the Clivus

Giulio Maira, Francesco Doglietto, Roberto Pallini

The clivus is localized at the center of the skull base, and its deep location renders surgical access a challenge. Tumors that arise purely from the clivus are rare, but this region can be involved with numerous processes extending from the structures near the clivus, mainly from the petrous–clival line. Tumors may be limited to a part of the clivus, or they may involve the entire clivus; they may also extend superiorly to the suprasellar region, inferiorly to the foramen magnum and cervical spine, and laterally to the cavernous sinus, subtemporal region, or cerebellopontine angle.

Different pathologic lesions can develop in this region.¹ Histologically, clival lesions can be benign (e.g., meningiomas, epidermoid cyst, cholesterol granuloma, or glomus jugulare tumors with major petroclival involvement), of low-grade malignancy (e.g., chordomas and chondrosarcomas), or of high-grade malignancy (e.g., squamous cell cancer, adenocarcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, osteogenic sarcoma, or metastases). Some of these tumors have an intradural location, whereas others are extradural.

The lesions that most often involve this region are meningiomas (commonly intradural), followed (much less commonly) by chordomas, which are often extradural. The former grow from the dura that covers the clivus or the passage from the clivus and the petrous bone (petroclivus fold),² whereas the latter originate directly from embryonic residues enclosed in the bone of the clivus.³^–⁶

Tumors in the region of the clivus may involve the lowest seven cranial nerves. The sixth cranial nerve can be within the tumor itself, where it runs through Dorello’s canal in the lateral region of the clivus. The brain stem can be displaced dorsally or laterally. The basilar artery is usually displaced contralaterally; however, occasionally it is shifted dorsally or encased by the tumor.

Major advances in imaging modalities over the last two decades have allowed a more precise delineation of the anatomic extension of these tumors. In most cases, the nature of the lesion can be predicted.

Tumors in the region of the clivus are difficult to treat using conventional neurosurgical approaches. Until a few decades ago, because of the relative inaccessibility of the clivus and its proximity to the brain stem and surrounding neurovascular structures, the results of surgical treatment were so dismal that these tumors were often considered incurable.¹

Advances in microsurgery of the skull base have resulted in the development and refinement of approaches to petroclival and clival lesions,⁷^–⁵⁷ better methods for tumor removal, and innovative techniques^44,^45,⁵⁸^–⁶² to minimize injury to neural and vascular structures during tumor removal. These factors enable the surgeon to treat these tumors more effectively, aiming at a radical excision with an acceptable morbidity and mortality.

In some cases, the combined effort of the neurosurgeon with those in other disciplines interested in skull base surgery (e.g., otolaryngology or maxillofacial surgery) constitutes real progress in the realization of special approaches that aim at improving the exposure of the tumor and reducing trauma to the brain during surgery. Endoscopic skull base surgery is the most recent result of this multidisciplinary concept.⁶³

In general, surgical approaches to the clival region have followed two main strategies. The first strategy utilizes conventional approaches, which are technically simple and are characterized by a low approach-related morbidity. The disadvantages of these approaches include the limited surgical field, long working distance, and need for brain retraction, all of which make tumor dissection difficult. The second strategy implies the use of complex approaches, which require specific anatomic knowledge on cadaveric dissections; they are time consuming because of the extensive bone removal and are themselves related to some morbidity in terms of hearing loss, facial nerve dysfunction, and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. These approaches facilitate tumor dissection as a result of the wide surgical field and short working distance.

A third option implies that simple conventional approaches, such as the retrosigmoid or subtemporal routes, may be combined with conservative petrosectomies to create key openings to the tumor area, while preserving hearing and providing adequate exposure to the petroclival and prepontine regions. Such approaches appear suited for treating petroclival meningiomas. In clival chordomas, however, the extensive bony involvement by the tumor forces the surgeon to choose between a partial removal through a simple anterior approach (e.g., the trans-sphenoidal approach or Le Fort I maxillotomy) and an attempt for total tumor resection using more complex anterior or anterolateral approaches. Nevertheless, surgeons who have extensive experience with the trans-sphenoidal route for pituitary tumors have shown that gross total removal of clival chordomas can be achieved in up to 70% of cases with low morbidity and excellent long-term survival.

In recent years, the introduction of the endoscope in trans-sphenoidal surgery and the use of extended endoscopic approaches have allowed resection of chordomas involving the lower clivus, and even the odontoid, with good short-term results and low surgical morbidity.⁶⁴^–⁷²

Surgical Anatomy

The clivus is located at the midline, in the deepest part of the skull base. It constitutes the inclined anteroinferior surface of the posterior cranial fossa and extends from the dorsum sellae to the foramen magnum (Fig. 41-1). It is formed by a sphenoidal part (corresponding to the superior third) that extends from the dorsum sellae to the spheno-occipital synchondrosis and by an occipital part (corresponding to the inferior two thirds) that reaches the anterior intraoccipital synchondroses.^3,⁷³

FIGURE 41-1 A, Anatomy of the clivus and adjacent structures. B, Anatomic division of the clivus in upper (1), middle (2), and lower (3) regions. C, The clivus and cranial nerves III and V to XII.

Surgical access to the clivus is complicated by the presence of osseous barriers corresponding to the sphenoid and facial bones (anteriorly and inferiorly) and to the petrous bones (laterally). Posteriorly and laterally, there are critical structures, including the basilar artery, brain stem, cavernous sinus, petrous carotid arteries, temporal lobes, and cranial nerves.

Because of the complexity of the clivus and its surrounding structures, knowledge of their anatomy is essential to planning a correct surgical approach in this region.

The clivus is usually divided into the upper, middle, and lower clivus ²⁵ (see Fig. 41-1) or into superior and inferior halves of the clivus.⁷⁴

The upper clivus is the part above the crossing of the trigeminal and the abducens nerves from the posterior to the middle cranial fossa; this part includes the dorsum sellae and the posterior clinoid processes. This area is bounded anteriorly by the sella turcica and sphenoid sinus, posteriorly by the basilar artery and midbrain, and laterally by the cavernous sinus, temporal lobes, and (from superior to inferior) cranial nerves III through VI.

The middle clivus is the part between the exits of the trigeminal and the glossopharyngeal nerves; it is bounded anteriorly by the upper nasopharynx and retropharyngeal tissues, posteriorly by the basilar artery and pons, and laterally by the petrous apices and cranial nerves VII and VIII.

The lower clivus is the part from the glossopharyngeal nerve to the foramen magnum. This part is bounded anteriorly by the lower nasopharynx and retropharyngeal tissues, posteriorly by the vertebral artery and medulla, and laterally by the sigmoid sinus, jugular bulb, and cranial nerves IX to XII.

The superior and inferior halves of the clivus extend, respectively, above the internal auditory canal and below it.

The topographic anatomy of the clivus makes several surgical approaches feasible.^1,^11,^34,^35,^37,^41,^75,⁷⁶ The choice of an approach to remove a tumor from this region must take into account the nature and location of the lesion (i.e., whether the lesion is intradural or extradural, its position in respect to the clivus, and its lateral extension).

The surgical approaches to the clivus are divided into three general groups: (1) anterior, (2) anterolateral, and (3) posterolateral. Anterior approaches are mainly used for extradural lesions that primarily involve the clivus and extend extracranially (e.g., chordoma and chondrosarcoma). For these tumors, the anterior approaches are usually extradural and include the trans-sphenoidal, transethmoidal, transoral–transpalatal, transmaxillary, and transcervical. A subfrontal transbasal extraintradural anterior approach can also be indicated for huge tumors with maximal involvement of the clival area and surrounding structures (e.g., chordoma, pituitary tumors, and craniopharyngiomas).

Anterolateral approaches are mainly utilized for intradural tumors that involve the upper and middle clivus and extend into the surrounding regions. The frontotemporal trans-sylvian approach exposes lesions of the upper clivus with extension in the suprasellar region. The subtemporal transtentorial approach exposes lesions of the upper and midclival region, with extension in the middle fossa and tentorial edge (a zygomatic osteotomy and anterior petrosectomy increase the exposure inferiorly and toward the clivus).

Posterolateral approaches are mainly utilized for tumors involving the medial and lower part of the clivus with extension to the petrous bone, cerebellopontine angle, foramen magnum, or upper cervical region. These approaches include the combined subtemporal suboccipital presigmoid with posterior petrosectomy (retrolabyrinthine, translabyrinthine, transcochlear, and total petrosectomy), the retrosigmoid, and the extreme lateral transcondylar approach.

Extradural Lesions: Chordomas

Chordomas are the most common extradural tumors of the clivus; they arise from remnants of the embryonic notochord and are located in all areas where the notochord existed (i.e., the entire clivus, sella turcica, foramen magnum, C1, and nasopharynx).^3,⁵ From there, they may spread to the upper cervical region, petrous bone, posterior fossa, cavernous sinus, middle fossa, nasopharynx, and sphenoid sinus.^3,⁵ Chordomas grow slowly but may present the characteristics of a malignant tumor in that they are locally aggressive with a tendency for regrowth.⁷⁷ About 20% of chordomas recur as early as 1 year after surgery despite extensive surgical resection.^48,⁷⁸ Ten percent of chordomas show histologic signs of malignancy.⁵ Although it is considered difficult to identify histologic features indicative of aggressiveness,^79,⁸⁰ recent studies indicate that some molecular features of these tumors are associated with an aggressive biologic behavior.^47,^48,^78,^81,⁸² Metastases are relatively rare.^78,⁸⁰

Chordomas infiltrate the bone and spread into the epidural space, seeding the dura with microscopic deposits well beyond the limits of the tumor bulk.^5,⁸³ For this reason, they may invade the dura and become adherent to the arachnoid and pia mater. The tumor is often gelatinous and soft, with a jelly-like consistency, but it may also appear as a firm cartilaginous mass.

Chordomas are usually classified according to the portion of clivus involved by the tumor and by the extension to surrounding structures (e.g., upper clivus, middle clivus, lower clivus, and craniocervical junction tumors, with or without invasion of sphenoid, cavernous sinus, and petrous bone).^1,³

Computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the most important radiologic tools for diagnosis. The CT scan reveals the destruction of bone, whereas MRI shows the extension of the tumor, which appears nonhomogenously hyperintense on T2-weighted images and with a variable contrast enhancement after gadolinium.⁴

The most commonly involved cranial nerve is the sixth, and diplopia is the most common presenting symptom, particularly in the midclivus chordomas. Other symptoms include headache, pituitary dysfunction, visual field defects, cerebellar syndrome, torticollis, and brain stem syndrome.⁸⁴

Surgical Treatment

Its deep position (at the central base of the skull) and its tendency to infiltrate the bone make total removal of the clivus chordoma difficult. Total resection leads to a significant improvement in survival at 5 years, with 90% and 52% with complete and partial resection, respectively;⁸⁵ at 10 years, the recurrence-free survival rate in a large series for primarily operated patients (with a complete resection of 83%) was 42%; for reoperation cases (complete resection achieved in 30% of patients), it was 26%.⁸⁶

In recent years, because of the development of innovative and complex approaches to the clival area ^29,^30,^34,^35,^37,^41,^42,^67,^68,⁸⁶^–⁹¹ and the extensive application of standard procedures to this area,^12,^13,^16,^36,^38,^84,⁹²^–¹⁰⁰ many possibilities are at the disposal of the surgeon attempting radical removal of these tumors.

Because chordomas are basically extradural and midline tumors, they displace the neuraxis dorsally or dorsolaterally. Anterior midline extradural approaches are generally preferred (Fig. 41-2).^20,^46,^52,^83,^92,¹⁰¹^–¹⁰⁵ These approaches allow a midline exposure of the clivus and a short working distance, avoiding any retraction of the brain.

FIGURE 41-2 Anterior approaches to the clivus: subfrontal transbasal approach (A), transsphenoidal approach (B), and transoral approach (C).

The choice of surgical approach depends on the location and extension of the tumor. Even when only anterior extracranial approaches are considered, many options exist. These include the transbasal,¹³ extended subfrontal,¹⁰⁴ microscopic trans-septal trans-sphenoidal,^16,^84,⁹³^–⁹⁴ modified microsurgical endoscope-assisted sublabial or endonasal trans-sphenoidal,^98,⁹⁹ endoscopic endonasal trans-sphenoidal,^64,⁶⁷^–⁷¹ trans-sphenoethmoidal,⁹² transmaxillary transnasal,¹⁰⁶ transfacial,¹⁰⁷ facial translocation,¹⁰⁸ transmaxillary,¹⁰⁹^–¹¹⁰ midfacial degloving,¹⁰³ transoral,¹² mandible-splitting transoral,⁹⁴ transcervical transclival,¹¹¹ and anterior cervical ¹¹² approaches; Le Fort I osteotomy;¹¹³ unilateral Le Fort I osteotomy;¹¹⁴ total rhinotomy; and pedicled rhinotomy.¹¹⁵

All of these approaches are devoted to removing all clival lesions localized on the midline without important lateral extent. In the case of massive lateral extension, in which a midline approach is insufficient for the removal of the entire tumor, complex lateral approaches can be utilized as a primary or secondary procedure.^1,⁵ These include, for lesions of the upper clivus, the subtemporal, transcavernous, and transpetrous apex approaches; for lesions of the midclivus, subtemporal and infratemporal approaches; and for lesions of the lower clivus with lateral extension to the occipital condyle, jugular foramen, and cervical area, the extreme lateral transcondylar (“far lateral”) approach.^26,^43,^86,¹¹⁶

According to the level of the clival lesion, the approaches that we often utilize include the following:

• For chordomas located in the upper and middle clivus, the trans-sphenoidal approach is favored.

• For lesions of the lower clivus that involve the foramen magnum, C1, and C2, the transoral approach is preferred, with or without splitting of the palate.

• For tumors in the lower clivus, foramen magnum, and first cervical spinal bodies, with important lateral extension, the Le Fort I osteotomy can be used with a midline incision of the hard and soft palate and lateral swinging of the two flaps of the hard palate.

• For huge tumors involving the entire clival area, the sphenoid, and the sellar region and extending anteriorly to the optic nerves, the transbasal or extended subfrontal route is utilized.

• For lesions that involve the lower clivus and the upper cervical region and that extend laterally into the occipital condyle and the jugular bulb on one side, the extreme lateral approach with partial condylectomy seems particularly well suited.

Other anterior approaches can be utilized, including the following:

• The trans-sphenoethmoidal approach ⁹² provides access to the entire sphenoid sinus, prepontine space, and superior clivus; a limited medial maxillectomy improves access to the inferior clivus.

• The transfacial approach ¹⁰⁷ is indicated for extradural tumors confined on the midline and extending from the level of the sellar floor to the foramen magnum. This approach offers direct access to the clivus along its rostrocaudal extent up to the anterior arch of C1; with depression of the palate, the odontoid can also be visualized. The main advantage is to add, by this single facial route, the possibilities of the trans-sphenoidal and transoral routes, avoiding any injury to the hard and soft palate. The disadvantages are a facial scar and osteotomy of the facial skeleton.

• The recent application of the endoscope to trans-sphenoidal surgery, in either endoscope-assisted or pure endoscopic approaches, provides wider visualization of lesions extending from the upper clivus to the odontoid process; in the future, they will probably be substituted for most transfacial routes, even for tumors extending inferiorly to the odontoid and laterally to the petrous apex.⁶⁴^–⁷² ¹¹⁷

Trans-sphenoidal Approach

The trans-sphenoidal approach provides excellent exposure to chordomas of the sphenoid sinus, sella turcica, and upper and middle clivus (see Fig. 41-2), minimizing the morbidity of more complex surgical approaches^13,^16,^84,⁹⁶ with a route that, where necessary, can easily be repeated. The technique utilized for the sublabial trans-septal trans-sphenoidal procedure has already been described.¹¹⁸ Extensive experience obtained with pituitary tumors¹¹⁹^–¹²⁰ and with craniopharyngiomas¹²¹ has made this route safe and effective, even for other pathologies (Figs. 41-3 to 41-6). Several papers have reported that gross total tumor removal can be achieved in up to 70% of cases using the trans-sphenoidal approach, with excellent long-term survival and no evidence of disease at a mean of 38.6 months after surgery.^84,^94,^95,^98,⁹⁹

FIGURE 41-3 Transsphenoidal approach, showing an upper and middle clivus chordoma with prepontine extension and brain stem compression. Contrast-enhanced MRI is used. A, Preoperative sagittal image. B, Preoperative coronal image. C, Postoperative sagittal image. D, Postoperative coronal image.

FIGURE 41-4 Transsphenoidal approach, showing an upper and middle clivus chordoma with a retroclival intradural extension (E). Contrast-enhanced MRI is used. A, Preoperative sagittal image. B, Postoperative sagittal image. C, Preoperative coronal image. D, Postoperative coronal image. E, Preoperative axial image. F, Postoperative axial image.

FIGURE 41-5 Transsphenoidal approach, showing an upper and middle clivus chordoma with an intradural retroclival nodule compressing the brain stem. Contrast-enhanced MRI is used. A, Preoperative sagittal image. B, Early postoperative sagittal image (1 month after surgery).

FIGURE 41-6 Transsphenoidal approach, showing a chordoma of the middle clivus with intradural retroclival extension causing an unusual intraaxial CSF cystic dilation. Contrast-enhanced, T1-weighted MRI is used. A, Preoperative sagittal image. B, Preoperative axial image. C, Preoperative coronal image. D, Postoperative sagittal image (6 months after surgery). E, Postoperative axial image (6 months after surgery). F, Postoperative coronal image (6 months after surgery). G, Postoperative sagittal image (5 years after surgery). H, Postoperative axial image (5 years after surgery). I, Postoperative coronal image (5 years after surgery).

The main disadvantages of this approach are represented by the limited lateral exposure and the deep and narrow field. Nevertheless, the correct use of long and angled curettes can allow a skillful surgeon to remove even large tumors (greater than 4 cm) that are not strictly confined to the midline.⁷⁸ Application of endoscopy to the trans-sphenoidal route may increase the surgical field and allow even extensive tumors to be removed.^45,^64,⁶⁷^–⁷¹

When the tumor is found to be located intradurally, an opening of the dura mater can be realized to remove the intradural tumor. Afterward, an accurate reconstruction must be realized. We usually use a dural patch and fibrin glue. When a major intraoperative CSF leak (grade 3 ¹²²) is evident, a lumbar drain is kept in place for 48 to 72 hours postoperatively.

Transoral Approach

The transoral route is indicated for extradural lesions of the inferior clivus that are confined to the midline, protrude into the posterior pharyngeal region, and extend to C1 to C2 (see Fig. 41-2). The approach provides good exposure with limited surgical trauma.^75,¹²³ This route has been used for many years for epidural tumors of the cervical spine.¹²⁴ Several reports have described the utilization of this surgical route to treat clivus chordomas.¹²⁵^–¹²⁷

A modified transoral version has been described for chordomas.^110,¹¹³ It combines the Le Fort I osteotomy with a midline incision of the hard and soft palate and allows lateral swinging of the two flaps of the hard palate based on their own palatine artery and nerves. The advantage is extensive exposure of the region, inferiorly and laterally (Fig. 41-7); the wound must be closed carefully to preserve occlusion and functioning of the palate. A unilateral Le Fort I osteotomy can be realized for laterally growing tumors.¹¹⁴ Neuronavigation in transoral approach has been found to be a useful tool for planning and checking the limits of resection and for reducing morbidity in chordoma surgery.⁴⁴

FIGURE 41-7 Modified transoral approach. Le Fort I osteotomy with a midline incision of the hard and soft palate. The middle and lower clivus chordoma are shown with left lateral extension. Contrast-enhanced MRI is used. A, Preoperative axial image. B, Postoperative axial image.

The Endoscope: A Surgical Adjunct for Wider Vision and Exposure

As a result of technological progress and collaboration between neurosurgeons and otolaryngologists,⁶³ the endoscope has been applied to trans-sphenoidal and transoral surgery to get visualization in these deep surgical corridors that is wider than the microsurgical vision. The use of the endoscopes in microsurgical approaches has allowed a view behind the corner achieved by angled (30 and 45 degrees) scopes.^98,⁹⁹ The main limit of endoscope-assisted microsurgery remains though the narrow surgical corridor in which the endoscope is positioned; this reduces the endoscope to a complex mirror to visualize tumor remnants, as tumor removal under an endoscopic view may be not possible because of the space limitation created by the self-retractor.

In recent years, “pure” endoscopic trans-sphenoidal approaches have been developed ⁶³ that use only the endoscope as a visualization tool. The approaches are performed through both nostrils to allow for a bimanual technique and a wide range of free motion. The major limit of pure endoscopic skull base surgery is the loss of the binocular vision provided by the microscopic technique. When the wider visualization achieved by the endoscope is coupled with wider exposure, the full advantage of the endoscopic technique is achieved, extending the realm of trans-sphenoidal surgery to the cavernous sinus,¹²⁸ petrous apex,¹¹⁷ lower clivus, and odontoid process.^65,⁷²

Results of the endoscopic series in the treatment of clival chordomas are at least comparable to the microsurgical trans-sphenoidal series,^64,^67,^68,⁷¹ though the small number of patients and the short follow-up preclude definitive conclusions in terms of survival and recurrence rate.

The endoscope has also been applied to the transoral approach to the anterior craniovertebral junction in limited series.¹²⁹ A pure endonasal endoscopic approach to C1 and the odontoid process has also been described.^72,¹³⁰ The main advantage of this approach, as compared to the transoral, is the visualization of the whole clivus and the avoidance of the soft palate splitting; its major limitation is the lowest extension of the surgical field, which is usually 9 mm above the base of the C2 body. The application of the endoscope to the transoral approach may reduce the need for splitting the soft palate yet maintain a satisfactory surgical maneuverability.¹³¹