CHAPTER 48 Supportive care for gynaecological cancer patients
Psychological and emotional aspects
Introduction
The patient
When a woman is diagnosed with gynaecological cancer, it affects her life in many ways. At the time of diagnosis, it may feel like an emotional onslaught and the effects can be both abrupt and long lasting. Sometimes, issues and feelings remain long after the cancer has gone. The challenge is how best to help the woman to cope with the knowledge of her disease and its implications for herself and her family. Support may be required for an extended period of time, in a variety of forms and from a number of different people. This should not be seen as a task that is the sole responsibility of one individual, but will inevitably involve ‘the team’. This is best managed by a multidisciplinary team approach, within a designated gynaecological oncology centre, where all members of the specialist support team are available (Improving Outcomes Guidance 1999) and with strong links to both hospital and community palliative care services.
Spiritual and Emotional Pain (Box 48.1)
Spiritual well-being has several components: a sense of purpose and meaning in life; a sense of relationship with self, others and a supreme being; and a feeling of hope (Moberg 1982, Miller 1985, Clark et al 1991). Both Clinebell (1966) and Ellison (1983) have identified four categories of basic spiritual needs: meaning; challenge in life; a reason for being; and continuing in the face of adversity. A person’s spiritual outlook makes a tremendous difference to the process of both living and dying (Moberg 1982). Spirituality functions as a resource during multiple losses and change (Reed 1987).
Box 48.1
Three steps in the spiritual growth of both doctors and nurses
Source: From Lane J, The care of the human spirit, Journal of Professional Nursing 1987;3: 332–337.
The diagnosis of cancer changes the patient’s life forever, causing her to confront her own mortality. The doctor or nurse who cares for these women confronts his or her own mortality an equal number of times (Pace 2000).
In order to be effective in these painful situations, doctors and nurses must understand their own feelings and be aware of the natural devices they might use to avoid what may often be a difficult situation and one for which they have received no formal training. Saunders and Baines (1989) use the concept of ‘staff pain’. They emphasize the need for staff to grieve the loss of a patient, and the importance of group support for staff and ‘debriefing’ sessions to allow opportunities to express these feelings in a safe and supportive environment.
Times of crisis can usually be turned into opportunities, and the intimacy of such moments between the woman and the doctor or nurse can produce deep feelings, sometimes tears. At times, it is appropriate to sit in silence and just the sense of being there can be recognition enough (Pace 2000). The most important point of all, at the core of every nursing or medical care situation, is the woman’s need for someone who is genuine. They need the honest truth, not evasion or empty reassurances. If the healthcare professional has not questioned and analysed his or her own beliefs for the reassurance, doubts and answers they provide, there may be little of value to offer the patient who is forced to confront the ultimate truths and uncertainties of all that comes thereafter.
Care that integrates the spiritual dimensions creates a nurse or doctor who is actually involved in a human relationship. Qualities that demonstrate the ability to provide better spiritual care include a supportive approach to the patient; what has been termed a ‘sense of benevolence’ to the patient; awareness of the patient, self and the impact of family and significant others; empathy; and non-judgemental understanding (Dickenson 1975).
It takes more than just education for a nurse or doctor to feel comfortable with spiritual issues. Introspection and an awareness of their own personal spiritual journey are required to integrate the spiritual domain into patient care (Pace 2000).
It is emphasized that healthcare professionals need to take care of their own spiritual needs. Failure to do so will lead to emotional exhaustion (Lane 1987).
Quality of Life
What is quality of life?
Quality of life was broadly defined as early as 1947, when the World Health Organization described it as ‘a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being, and not merely absence of disease and infirmity’ (King et al 1997).
Quality of life is a complex phenomenon that affects an individual’s personality and lifestyle. It is developed over time with physical, psychological, sociocultural, sexual and spiritual effects (Woods 1975). It is affected by change in appearance, mental states, personal and social factors and, in the case of cancer, the effects of disease process and treatments. It is tied closely to the concept of body image, self-esteem and self-concept, and is affected by attitudes, beliefs and behaviours (Penson et al 2000).
Poor body image can result in the patient feeling worthless as a person; physically unattractive or even repulsive; and unable to feel valued, loved or able to express themselves sexually (Box 48.2) (Dudas 1992). For some women, quality of life means feeling alive. It is personal and individual, and what is considered normal or acceptable to one person or couple may be unacceptable to another.
Effects of gynaecological cancer
The patient
Both the diagnosis and management of gynaecological cancer can have a major impact on every aspect of a woman’s quality of life (Donovan et al 1989). It can be an overwhelming experience for a woman and her family, Then, before the woman has had time to work through her feelings of shock and grief relating to the diagnosis, she must begin treatment. There is no doubt that a diagnosis of gynaecological cancer can potentially compromise the key elements described for quality of life: body image, sexual health and relationships (Auchinloss 1989, Colyer 1996). Women of childbearing age experience sadness and anger at the loss of fertility, and women of all ages may view the loss of female organs as a loss of femininity (Steginga and Dunn 1997).
The short- and long-term side-effects of treatment may also affect a woman’s self-worth, self-esteem and confidence, and have potential or actual psychosocial and psychosexual implications (Box 48.3) (Anderson 1985, Sacco Ezzell 1999). For example, a premature menopause, hair loss, lymphoedema, a stoma or a surgical scar may impact further on the reaction to the actual cancer (Anderson 1993).
However, it is also important to remember that body image may be altered and affect sexual health and quality of life without any change in appearance, function or control (Price 1990). Being told the diagnosis of cancer may alter body image, as this new knowledge of change may affect the woman’s perception of herself and her health. This perception of change can lead to a distortion of body image; the woman may sense that something in herself or in her way of relating to others has changed, even before cancer or treatment have any physical effect. Smithman (1981) points out: ‘Some changes in function can be purely psychological, and yet the potential for disturbed self-concept is great’. It is therefore widely accepted that body image, sexual health and overall quality of life are affected by physical factors, physical sensations, and emotional and social reactions.
The partner
It is also important to assess the partner’s understanding and needs, as the effect of the cancer is on the relationship as a result of change to either individual. A needs assessment among cancer patients and their partners showed that 63% of the participants would have liked to receive more information about sexual functioning after treatment, and that 64% would participate in a specific counselling programme on the quality-of-life changes if this was offered (Bullard et al 1980).
Model (1990) examined reactions to body image change following surgery in some depth, and linked these to concepts of grief and loss. This is useful as it considers how nurses support both patients and their partners psychologically. Model suggests that we are far from doing this successfully, and that it is important to create an atmosphere in which patients and their partners feel accepted and understood if they experience anxiety, anger or grief, and to provide a medium through which they can express, share and clarify their feelings. Model recommends that the whole healthcare team should work together to do this, which does indeed seem vital, given that many patients and their partners express feelings of isolation following discharge from treatment and for some time thereafter (Colyer 1996).
A high proportion of women are anxious (31%) and depressed (41%) after surgery for gynaecological cancer (Corney et al 1992). The majority have chronic sexual problems and a high proportion would like further information on after-effects: physical, sexual and emotional. Fifty per cent of young women would have liked their partners to be involved, and 25% of the 40 partners who were involved would have preferred further information.
What we must try to achieve
Faced with multiple adjustment demands relating to the cancer, the treatments, survivorship issues or palliation of disease and its symptoms, it is important that the couple are encouraged to prioritize what is important to them and have ownership over agreed interventions. It is essential that this assessment not only covers the cancer diagnosis and treatment, but takes into account what life was like for the woman and her partner/family before the cancer (Box 48.4).
Box 48.4 Aspects of quality of life that may change
Assessing the needs
The effects of both the cancer and treatments have the potential to be both abrupt and long lasting, even when the goal is cure. The impact of altered body image resulting from treatments and/or surgical procedures for chronic illness extends beyond the immediate patient (Wilson and Williams 1988). Therefore, the need for individualized assessment on how this will impact on quality of life, both before and following cancer treatment, is fundamental (Box 48.5). Assessment must be as specific as possible (Box 48.6) and address the woman’s concerns by self-assessment techniques.
Box 48.5 The assessment process
The changing focus of need
Whilst families are often the primary source of ongoing support to female cancer patients, women also derive considerable support from other patients and from healthcare professionals. The medical team should aim to develop psychological and psychosexual skills to cope with this important area of care. Further research is also needed into how support groups may best meet patients’ needs (Veronesi et al 1999) and those of the care providers.
What we must learn
Healthcare professionals must develop an appreciation of the wider issues and literature surrounding sexual health, altered body image, gender identity, role identity, cultural issues, religious beliefs, and how all the factors can influence self-esteem and body image and impact on quality of life in either a positive or negative way (Masters et al 1995).
Concern is often expressed in clinical practice that healthcare professionals lack the time and skills to deal with psychological and quality-of-life issues, although the literature suggests that giving patients the opportunity to express such concerns can be preventive of problems as well as therapeutic (Auchinloss 1989).
Despite its importance, quality of life is rarely a reported outcome in randomized clinical trials in cancer patients. Gynaecological oncology nurses, clinicians, educators and researchers must continue to work collaboratively to enhance the knowledge base regarding quality-of-life issues and to improve care provided to women with gynaecological cancer (King et al 1997). The impact of a gynaecological cancer on a woman’s quality of life is an important outcome parameter that may be measured as survival without significant morbidity (Anderson and Lutgendorf 1997).
Psychosocial Issues and Returning to Normality
The issues that must be addressed (Box 48.7) may be ongoing, and follow-up appointments provide an opportunity to assess how the woman and her family are readjusting to life following cancer.
Sexuality and Psychosexual Issues Relating to Gynaecological Cancer
In 1986, the World Health Organization stated that key elements of sexual health were:
A gynaecological cancer diagnosis and treatment may threaten or actually change the key elements described for sexual health, and are associated with considerable sexual dysfunction (IOG 1999).
The background
A woman’s physical genital development, her attitudes and security about being a woman, and her view of herself in relation to others, especially in intimate relationships, are all part of her uniqueness. Sexual functioning and concerns vary throughout one’s lifespan and cannot be assumed for any age group or extent of disease. A woman’s genital region may be perceived as psychologically very special, being both exquisitely sensitive and primal in sexual arousal. A malignancy in this area may be especially disturbing and significantly different in its emotional effects from cancer in other parts of the body. Reactions may vary according to feelings of the individual woman about her genitalia prior to developing a gynaecological cancer. However, there is no doubt that cancer of the vulva, which necessitates very evident vulval mutilation as a consequence of surgical treatment, can produce severe problems with psychosexual function (IOG 1999).
Effects of gynaecological cancer
A study by Cull et al (1993) included 83 women with early-stage cervical cancer, half of whom had received surgery and half of whom had received radiotherapy. They were studied by standard self-report questionnaires and semi-structured interview. Over half reported deterioration in sexual function, and the irradiated women suffered more with loss of sexual pleasure. Many women felt that their psychological needs were not being met adequately.
A similar UK study included 105 women who had undergone radical pelvic surgery, of whom 65% had been treated for primary cervical cancer (Corney et al 1993). The mean time since treatment was 2 years. Of 73 women in whom the vagina had been preserved and who were in a sexual relationship, 16% never resumed intercourse. Two-thirds were experiencing sexual difficulties and around half reported a deterioration in their sexual relationship. However, this study highlights the need to never ‘assume’ as, interestingly, around one-third of these couples felt that their marital relationship had actually improved.
The need to provide information
The inadequate information about the effects of disease and its therapeutic interventions on people’s sexual function and alterations in their quality of life is also reflected in the scarce amount of empirical research available on these issues. All oncology professionals should be aware of the importance of recognizing and addressing issues of sexual function as an integral aspect of quality of life for people with cancer and their partners (Gallo-Silver 2000), and both nurses and doctors need to develop skills in talking to patients and partners about sexual concerns and in taking a sexual history (Smith 1989, Green 1999).
They will require and expect therapeutic interventions which will assist them in becoming psychosexually as well as physically rehabilitated (Derogatis 1980).
The goal of intervention
The goal of sexual rehabilitation is to restore the patient’s ability to engage in intimate interpersonal relationships, and incorporates the restoration of self-esteem and bodily function or adaption to change (Bancroft 1989). When appropriate and desired, sexual rehabilitation includes restoring physical ability to engage in sexual activity. Sexuality is an important aspect of quality of life and has a tremendous impact on an individual, their partner and families (Rutter 2000).
Listening and asking
Sexuality may be expressed in a multitude of ways so it is imperative that healthcare professionals do not make assumptions about sexual behaviour, and understand that information assists women in regaining a sense of control over their behaviour and destiny (Burke 1996). This applies just as much to the late stages of the disease as to the early phases of the journey.
Communicating a willingness to assist women to ways to express their sexuality in spite of the cancer and consequences of treatment can be a challenge (MacElveen-Hoehn and McCorkle 1985). Basic counselling skills such as listening, a non-judgemental approach, and an open and accepting attitude with clear boundaries help to legitimize concerns as normal and valid (Lamb 1985, Laurent 1994).
Intervention
Both cognitive and behavioural sexual rehabilitation interventions have been suggested to assist women and their partners to adjust to the physical, psychological and psychosexual changes due to cancer and their impact on the relationship (Gallo-Silver 2000). The interventions described aim to increasing understanding and gradual adjustment, allowing the woman and her partner to have ‘ownership’ over the interventions chosen and to regain control.
The P-LI-SS-IT model (Box 48.8) (Royal College of Nursing 2000) is a framework for assessment of sexual need and can be useful as part of the multidisciplinary team approach to assessment of sexuality in women with cancer.
Box 48.8
Outline of P-LI-SS-IT model
Level 1: Permission (P)
Source: Royal College of Nursing 2000 P-LI-SS-IT model. In: Sexuality and Sexual Health in Nursing Practice. RCN, London.
Despite careful assessment and interventions, problems may still arise and expectations may not be met. The need for the skills and expertise to provide in-depth assessment of need and intensive structured therapy in the form of marital or sexual counselling is recognized in the P-LI-SS-IT model (Bancroft 1989, Penson et al 2000). Doctors and nurses need to be secure in the knowledge that it is appropriate to refer to a sexual therapist as the need is identified with the patient or couple.
Behavioural therapy
Direct behavioural approaches for treating sexual dysfunction due to performance anxiety are advocated (Masters and Johnson 1970). Sensate focus may be useful as it is aimed at regaining intimacy within the relationship through mutual touching and physical sexual sensation and stimulation of each other’s body parts, while not necessarily needing to involve the genitals or the act of intercourse. It is essentially about being able to communicate and relax with their partner, and developing a sense of trust and closeness which may have been lost (Leiblum and Rosen 1989). The sensate focus method restructures and reorientates how couples may ordinarily approach sexual interactions, allowing them to move away from old familiar habits and reinvent the physical side of their relationship. It is about touching and being touched. However, at the heart of the programme is an initial ban on sexual intercourse, particularly genital contact and penetration, until performance anxiety and fear of failure have subsided and trust within the relationship has been re-established.
Breaking ‘Bad News’
‘Bad news’ can be defined as any information that dramatically alters a patient’s view of her future for the worse (Kay 1996). The way in which bad news is delivered affects both the patient’s and the family’s ability to cope, and should therefore be done in a sensitive and, where possible, planned and supportive way.
Bad news may be broken in the following circumstances:
Breaking bad news well is important for the following reasons:
The actual process of breaking bad news
Preparation
The doctor’s role in the breaking of bad news
The nurse’s role in the breaking of bad news
After the consultation
Dealing with collusion and the conspiracy of silence
To prevent collusion occurring, the following should be addressed.
If the opportunity is given to discuss the woman’s illness, with care and support for the whole family to cope, a very positive outcome can result. The alternative is that the strain of pretence will undermine patient and family alike, with both sides usually being unaware of the reality of the situation, even if this is not admitted (Twycross and Lack 1983).
Letting the news sink in
Women often report that they ‘shut off’ and ‘could no longer bear to listen’. Hogbin and Fallowfield (1989) have suggested that tape recording ‘bad news’ consultations and giving the tape to the patient to take away with them may help them to understand the problem, overcome failures of recall, and explain the diagnosis and any treatment plan to their relatives.
Another suggestion is to write down the facts from the information given verbally following the consultation in which bad news is broken, and allow the patient an opportunity to absorb the information at her own pace over time and once the shock process has started to shift. Once the reality of her new situation has sunk in, the need for more factual information and exploration of the options in order to take back some control often takes over from initial fear, shock and stunned silence (IOG 1999). Written information following the breaking of bad news can then be extremely useful in helping the patient and family to formulate their questions prior to their next consultation with the specialist team.
Many areas also have local cancer support groups and there are national cancer helplines which may also be useful in helping patients to come to terms with the ‘bad news’ given (see Sources of support below).
Recurrence of Disease and Cessation of Active Therapy
The resentment at having been cheated can be great. For some, it is simply having cancer; for others, the word ‘cure’ has probably been ‘heard’ rather than said, but all feel that false hope has been given. The balance between false hope and no hope is difficult to achieve but is important (Saunders and Baines 1989). Anger may also be accompanied by spiritual pain. If this anger is accepted and understood, the path to acceptance is cleared. If it is not understood, and especially if it is met by a defensive attitude, it may increase as unresolved or unexpressed anger and may lead to depression (Massie and Holland 1989). Permanent, intermittent or transitory denial of the prognosis represents a necessary defence mechanism against a massive assault on the mind and emotions, and should be treated as such; the patient should be allowed to accept her situation at her own pace (Kay 1996). Cessation of active therapy means that the woman may now be facing the terminal stage of her journey. This knowledge is accompanied by new fears: the course of the disease, disfigurement, dependency, loss of self-respect and dignity, dying and the manner of dying.
Open discussion, honesty and acknowledgement of these anxieties with all concerned will help towards emotional security. Stopping treatment need not remove all hope. The nature of hope is to be flexible: hope for cure can be replaced with hope for time, and an opportunity to complete unfinished business or to aim for a particular personal milestone. Loneliness and a feeling of isolation are not only hard to bear in themselves but also heighten other symptoms of advanced disease. The isolation is sometimes imposed by the woman herself when the thought of parting becomes intolerable (Maguire 1993).
Now the patient has to face the more immediate prospect of death, it is possible to deal honestly with her without moving into stark truth (Saunders and Baines 1989). The immediate reaction may be disbelief or denial (Faulkner and Maguire 1994, Kay 1996). She may react with anger, either immediately or at a later stage. Depression is common and these different emotions may occur at any time; daily alterations between one and another are possible. The depression which may follow the woman’s realization of the severity of her illness should not be confused with endogenous depression. When an individual is faced with the imminent prospect of death, depression and grief are appropriate, not pathological reactions (Massie and Holland 1989).
Although most patients welcome the truth, it may take some time and much discussion on several occasions for her to face her situation fully. She needs to feel she can survive as a fully integrated person, whatever length of time she has and however the disease process or treatment affects her. There needs to be room for hope and for denial (Pace 2000). A scientific approach often suggests that we must give patients ‘the facts’ and help them to ‘accept the truth’, but denial may be a functional and appropriate coping skill at that particular time (Corless 1992). As the old hospice adage goes, unless something is terribly wrong with where the patient is, that is perhaps where the patient needs to be.
Fear of symptoms in advanced stage of disease
The patient’s mental state will profoundly affect her symptomatology (Faulkner and Maguire 1994; Twycross 1997a). Fear of symptoms causes anxiety in the palliative stage, not only for themselves but for the significance they bear. If this is discussed fully with the patient and relatives, the anxiety can be diminished and the future can be faced with confidence that problems will be taken seriously.
Saunders and Baines (1989) have stressed the role of symptom control, but also point out that this requires time and close contact with the woman to give her the confidence to impart her deeper feelings, whether they be of anger, depression, guilt or regret. Guilt, anger and grief all need to be expressed, understood and acknowledged as valid, even if answers cannot be offered.
Factors that lower the pain threshold include fear, anger, sadness and boredom. Sympathy, understanding, companionship, diversional activity and elevation of mood raise the pain threshold (Twycross and Lack 1983).
Good communication which allows expression of fears and anxiety, and that conveys understanding and support can be a powerful means of alleviating pain. In some instances, the relief of persistent pain may require no more than providing the honest communication that has previously been denied to the patient (Lichter 1987).
Symptom control
Principles of symptom control
Assessment of pain
Clear assessment of the pain is required based on the patient’s verbal reports. A history of the site/s, area of radiation, duration, aggravating and relieving factors, as well as relevant clinical examination is needed. It is important because continuous pain (visceral and soft tissue) responds to morphine, whereas other types of pain (bone, nerve, colic or non-cancer-related pain, e.g. migraine, angina) need other approaches (Kay 1994).
A body chart may be useful for initial assessment because it serves as a communication tool by making the pain ‘visible’. It demonstrates the sites of pain, as 80% of patients are thought to have two or more pains (Kay 1994). It should be drawn with or by the patient herself.
Recording pain scores is another simple way to monitor difficult, complex pain control. The woman is asked three times a day to rate the severity of her pain on a scoring system of 0–10, where 0 is no pain at all and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. The scores are reproduced on a pain chart or kept in a patient diary. They may be useful to monitor responses to different treatments, are subjective to the woman’s individual experience and allow early changes in pain management to be considered. It is important to remember that pain is whatever the patient says it is (Twycross 1997b).
Route and frequency of drug administration
When possible, analgesia should be given by mouth. Adequate analgesia is obtained by regular administration of an adequate dose of an appropriate drug at the time intervals which take into account the compound’s pharmacokinetics and the individual woman’s routine, i.e. time of waking, meal times and sleeping. This reduces the risk of breakthrough pain, but alternative or additional analgesics must be considered and prescribed for breakthrough pain before it actually occurs. Persistent pain requires preventative therapy; analgesics should be given regularly and prophylactically (Twycross 1997b).
Choosing the correct analgesia
The World Health Organization (1986) has suggested a three-stage analgesic ladder for the management of pain. This involves the choice of non-opioid analgesics, mild opioids and strong opioids, each stage involving appropriate use of other non-opioid or adjuvant drugs which may relieve pains of varying type and cause. If a drug fails to relieve the pain, it is important to move up the ladder or/and consider adjuvant drugs, but not to move laterally in the same efficacy group.
The right dose of analgesia for an individual woman is the dose which relieves the pain at night, at rest, during the day and on movement, although this may not be completely possible (Twycross 1997b).
Needs of the Woman Who is Dying
A peaceful death is important for the relatives as well as the patient. Families often find it comforting if carers continue to talk to the patient even after unconsciousness. Sedation for terminal agitation or distress should be prompt. It can be allowed to wear off once the patient is settled and any reversible causes have been treated to see if sedation is still necessary (Kay 1996).
The terminal phase is characterized by day-to-day deterioration. The common symptoms in the terminal 48 h are shown in Box 48.9. It is beyond the scope of this chapter to discuss the management of each individually.
Bereavement
Immediate expressions of grief vary but the bereaved person may:
Sources of Support
There are many national support organizations who help and support bereaved individuals.
KEY POINTS
Anderson BL. Sexual functioning and morbidity among cancer survivors: patient status and future research directions. Cancer. 1985;55:1835-1842.
Anderson BL. Predicting sexual and psychological morbidity and improving the quality of life for women with gynaecology cancer. Cancer. 1993;71:1678-1690.
Anderson B, Lutgendorf S. Quality of life in gynaecologic cancer survivors. Cancer: a Journal for Clinicians. 1997;47:218-225.
Auchinloss C. Sexual dysfunction in cancer patients: issues in evaluation and treatment. In: Holland J, Rowland J, editors. Handbook of Psycho-oncology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Bancroft J. Human Sexuality and its Problems, 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1989.
Bullard D, Causey G, Newman A. Sexual health care and cancer: a needs assessment. In: Vaeth J, editor. Frontiers of Radiation Therapy in Oncology. Basel: Karger, 1980.
Burke LM. Sexual dysfunction following radiotherapy for cervical cancer. British Journal of Nursing. 1996;4:239-244.
Clark C, Cross J, Deane D, Lowry L. Spirituality: integral to quality care. Holistic Nursing Practice. 1991;5:67-76.
Clinebell HJJ. Basic Types of Pastoral Counselling. Nashville, TN: Abington Press; 1966.
Colyer H. Women’s experiences of living with cancer (body image and sexuality in gynaecological cancer patients, focusing on three patient histories). Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1996;23:496-501.
Corless I. Hospice and hope: an incompatible duo. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care. 1992;9:10-12.
Corney R, Everett H, Howells A, Crowther M. The care of patients undergoing surgery for gynaecological cancer, the need for information, emotional support and counselling. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1992;17:667-671.
Corney RH, Crowther ME, Everett H, et al. Psychosexual dysfunction in women with gynaecological cancer following radical pelvic surgery. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1993;100:73-78.
Cull A, Cowie VJ, Farquharson D, et al. Early stage cervical cancer: psychosocial and sexual outcomes of treatment. British Journal of Cancer. 1993;68:1216-1220.
Derogatis L. Breast and gynaecological cancers: their unique impact on body image and sexual identity in women. In: Vaeth J, editor. Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology. Basel: Karger, 1980.
Dickenson C. The search for spiritual meaning. American Journal of Nursing. 1975;75:1789-1793.
Donovan K, Sanson-Fisher RW, Redman S. Measuring quality of life in cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1989;7:959-968.
Dudas S. Manifestations of cancer treatment. In: Groenwold S, Hanson-Frogge M, Goodman M, Henke-Yarbo C, editors. Cancer Symptom Management. Boston: Jones and Bartlett, 1992.
Ellison E. Spiritual well-being: conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Psychology and Theology. 1983;11:330-340.
Faulkner A, Maguire P. Talking to Cancer Patients and their Relatives. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 1994.
Frankl VE. Man’s Search for Meaning, 50th edn. London: Hodder and Stoughton; 1987.
Gallo-Silver L. The sexual rehabilitation of persons with cancer. Cancer Practice. 2000;8:10-15.
Green J. Taking a sexual history. Trends in Urology/Gynaecology and Sexual Health. 1999:31-33.
Hogbin B, Fallowfield L. Getting it taped: the ‘bad news’. Consultation with cancer patients. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 1989;41:330-333.
Kay P. A–Z Pocket Book of Symptom Control. London: EPL Publications; 1994.
Kay P. Breaking Bad News. London: EPL Publications; 1996.
Improving Outcome Guidance. Guidelines on Commissioning Cancer Services. Improving Outcomes in Gynaecological Cancers. Department of Health, UK; 1999.
King CR, Harman M, Berry DL, et al. Quality of life and the cancer experience: the state of the knowledge. Oncology Nursing Forum. 1997;24:27-41.
Lamb M. Sexual dysfunction in gynaecology oncology patients. Seminars in Oncology Nursing. 1985;1:9-17.
Lane J. The care of the human spirit. Journal of Professional Nursing. 1987;3:332-337.
Laurent M. Talking treatment: nursing counsellor’s role in helping patients deal with the psychosocial and sexual problems of treatment for cervical cancer. Nursing Times. 1994;10:14-15.
Leiblum SR, Rosen RC, editors. Principles and Practice of Sex Therapy. New York: Guilford Press, 1989.
Lichter I. Communication in Cancer Care. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1987.
MacElveen-Hoehn P, McCorkle R. Understanding sexuality in progressive disease. Seminars in Oncology Nursing. 1985;1:56-62.
Maguire P. Handling the withdrawn patients — a flow diagram. Palliative Medicine. 1993;7:333-338.
Massie MJ, Holland JC. Overview of normal reactions and prevalence of psychiatric disorders. In: Holland JC, Rowlands JH, editors. Handbook of Psycho-oncology. Oxford: Oxford Medical Press, 1989.
Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human Sexual Inadequacy. London: Churchill; 1970.
Masters W, Johnson V, Kolodny R. Human Sexuality. New York: Harper Collins; 1995.
Miller J. Assessment of loneliness and spiritual well-being in chronically ill and healthy adults. Journal of Professional Nursing. 1985;1:79-85.
Moberg D. Spiritual well-being of the dying. In: Lesnoff-Caravaglia G, editor. Aging and the Human Condition. Springfield, IL: Human Sciences Press, 1982.
Model G. A new image to accept: psychological aspects of stoma care. Professional Nurse. 1990;3:10-16.
Pace JC. Spirituality issues. Women and Cancer: a Gynaecological Oncology Nursing Perspective. 2000;15:579-598.
Penson RT, Gallagher J, Giorella M, et al. Sexuality and cancer: conversation comfort zone. The Oncologist. 2000;5:336-344.
Price B. Body Image: Nursing Concepts and Care. London: Prentice Hall; 1990.
Royal College of Nursing. P-LI-SS-IT model. In: Sexuality and Sexual Health in Nursing Practice. London: RCN; 2000.
Reed P. Spirituality and well-being in terminally ill hospitalized adults. Research in Nursing and Health. 1987;10:335-344.
Rutter M. The impact of illness on sexuality. In: Wells D, editor. Caring for Sexuality in Health and Illness. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
Sacco Ezzell P. Managing the effects of gynaecological cancer treatment on quality of life and sexuality. Society of Gynaecological Nursing Oncologists. 1999;8:23-26.
Saunders C, Baines M. Living with Dying. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 1989.
Smith DB. Sexual rehabilitation of the cancer patient. Cancer Nursing. 1989;12:10-15.
Smithman C. Nursing Actions for Health Care Promotion. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 1981.
Steginga K, Dunn J. Women’s experiences following treatment for gynaecological cancer. Oncology Nurses Forum. 1997;24:1403-1407.
Twycross R. Symptom Management in Advanced Cancer, 2nd edn. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 1997.
Twycross R. Introductory Palliative Care, 2nd edn. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 1997.
Twycross R, Lack S. Symptom Control in Far Advanced Cancer: Pain Relief. Tunbridge Wells: Pitman Medical; 1983.
Veronesi U, ven Kleist S, Redmond K, et al. Caring about women and cancer (CAWAC): a European survey of the perspectives and experiences of women with female cancers. European Journal of Cancer. 1999;35:1667-1675.
Wilson E, Williams H. Oncology nurses’ attitudes and behaviours related to sexuality of patients with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum. 1988;15:49-53.
Woods N. Human Sexuality in Health and Illness. St Louis: CV Mosby; 1975.
World Health Organization. Concepts for Sexual Health. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 1986.