PRINCIPLES

The principles of RRT have been extensively studied and described.^1–3 This is a summary of some aspects which are relevant to the critical care physician.

INDICATIONS FOR RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY

In the critically ill patient, RRT should be initiated early, prior to the development of complications. Fear of early dialysis stems from the adverse effects of conventional IHD with cuprophane membranes, especially haemodynamic instability, and from the risks and limitations of continuous or intermittent PD.^4–5 However, continuous RRT (CRRT)^6,7 or slow low-efficiency daily dialysis (SLEDD)⁸ minimises these effects. The criteria for the initiation of RRT in patients with chronic renal failure may be inappropriate in the critically ill.^9,10 A set of modern criteria for the initiation of RRT in the intensive care unit (ICU) is presented in Table 41.1.

Table 41.1 Modern criteria for the initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the intensive care unit*

* If one criterion is present, RRT should be considered. If two criteria are simultaneously present, RRT is strongly recommended.

† Please be aware of differences between plasma versus serum measurement in your laboratory.

With IHD, CRRT or SLEDD there are limited data on what is ‘adequate’ intensity of dialysis. However, this concept should include maintenance of homeostasis at all levels,¹⁰ and better uraemic control may translate into better survival.^11,12 An appropriate target urea might be 15–25 mmol/l, with a protein intake around 1.5 g/kg per day. This can be easily achieved using CRRT at urea clearances of 35–45 l/day depending on patient size and catabolic rate. If intermittent therapy is used, daily and extended treatment as described with SLEDD becomes desirable.¹³

MODE OF RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY

There is a great deal of controversy as to which mode of RRT is ‘best’ in the ICU, due to the lack of randomised controlled trials comparing different techniques. In their absence, techniques of RRT may be judged on the basis of the following criteria:

CRRT and SLEDD offer many advantages over PD and conventional IHD (3–4 h/day, 3–4 times/week),¹³ and whereas CRRT is almost exclusively used in some centres,¹⁴ only a minority of American ICU patients receive CRRT. Some salient aspects of CRRT, IHD and PD require discussion.

CONTINUOUS RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY

First described in 1977, CRRT has undergone several technical modifications. Initially, it was performed as an arteriovenous therapy (continuous arteriovenous HF: CAVH). The need to cannulate an artery, however, is associated with 15–20% morbidity. Accordingly, double-lumen catheters and peristaltic blood pumps have come into use (continuous venovenous HF: CVVH) with or without control of ultrafiltration rate. Ultrafiltration rates of 2 l/h yield urea clearances > 30 ml/min. Diagrams illustrating typical HF circuits are presented in Figures 41.1–41.3.

Figure 41.1 Diagrams illustrating a continuous venovenous haemofiltration circuit (CVVH).

Figure 41.2 Diagrams illustrating a continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration circuit (CVVHDF).

Figure 41.3 Diagram illustrating a continuous venovenous haemodialysis circuit (CVVHD).

In a venovenous system, dialysate can also be delivered countercurrent to blood flow (continuous veno-venous haemodialysis/haemodiafiltration) to achieve either almost pure diffusive clearance or a mixture of diffusive and convective clearance.

No matter what technique is used, the following outcomes are predictable:

1 continuous control of fluid status

2 haemodynamic stability

3 control of acid–base status

4 ability to provide protein-rich nutrition while achieving uraemic control

5 control of electrolyte balance, including phosphate and calcium balance

6 prevention of swings in intracerebral water

7 minimal risk of infection

8 high level of biocompatibility

However, CRRT mandates the presence of specifically trained nursing and medical staff 24 hours a day. Small ICUs often cannot provide such level of support. If CRRT is only used 5–10 times a year, the cost of training may be unjustified and expertise may be hard to maintain. Furthermore, depending on the organisation of patient care, CRRT may be more expensive than IHD. Finally, the issues of continuous-circuit anticoagulation and the potential risk of bleeding have been a major concern.

DOSE OF CRRT AND CIRCUIT ANTICOAGULATION

The optimal dose (expressed as effective effluent per kilogram per hour) of CRRT remains unknown. Several studies suggest that higher dose may translate into better outcome.^12,15 However such studies have been single-centre in nature and require confirmation in multicentre randomised controlled trials. Such trials are now under way (see below).¹⁶ It seems wise to wait for the results of larger studies before making any changes to the typical dose of approximately 25 ml/kg per hour currently delivered in Australia and New Zealand.

Buy Membership for Anesthesiology Category to continue reading. Learn more here