Pulsed Radiofrequency

Published on 27/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 27/02/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1340 times

Chapter 16 Pulsed Radiofrequency

Chapter Overview

Chapter Synopsis: Radiofrequency (RF) techniques are used to ablate neural tissue in the treatment of painful conditions by delivering thermal lesions. This chapter focuses on a procedure known as pulsed RF (PRF), which sends pulses of electrical currents to an electrode tip to targeted nerve tissue. The pulsatile nature of the stimulation allows the tip to cool between pulses, keeping the electrode below 42° C, the temperature at which damage to surrounding tissue would occur. The targeted nociceptive tissue is thought to sustain damage from high-density electrical fields generated during the PRF, although the mechanism of destruction is not entirely understood. PRF has been used in a wide variety of both painful and nonpainful conditions. Notably, the technique has been applied at every spinal level of the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and at many peripheral nerve sites. PRF is most commonly used to treat lumbar or cervical radicular pain. Although data from observational studies indicate that the procedure is quite effective for the treatment of radicular pain, two randomized controlled studies suggest only short-term analgesic benefits.

Important Points:

Clinical Pearl: Due to the relative safety of PRF, its clinical use is widespread, and it has been applied to an array of structures including central nervous system ganglia, peripheral nerves, intervertebral discs, joints, and myofascial trigger points for the treatment of a range of pain syndromes.

Clinical Pitfall: Observational studies on this topic are abundant, and they almost universally support the PRF use. However, only a few controlled trials of PRF use are available, and they report its variable efficacy, which at best is short term.

Introduction and History

Radiofrequency (RF) currents have been used clinically to create predictable and quantifiable thermal lesions since the 1950s and have been used in the treatment of pain since the early 1970s.1 During conventional RF (CRF) application for the treatment of pain, the RF currents are passed through an electrode that is placed in the vicinity of a nociceptive pathway. Consequently, the electrical energy imparted to the tissues immediately surrounding the active electrode tip creates a thermal lesion, likely interrupting the nociceptive impulses.2 Because tissue temperatures above 45° C are known to be neurodestructive,3 tissue temperatures are characteristically raised to well above the neurodestructive range but below the point of gas formation—80° C to 90° C. Although selective destruction of unmyelinated C and A-δ fibers by CRF thermal lesioning has been suggested,4 further studies showed indiscriminate destruction of all nerve fiber types during thermal CRF lesioning.5 Because of the possible risk of injury to the motor nerve fibers, local neuritis, loss of sensation, and deafferentation pain, the clinical use of CRF has generally been limited to facet denervation.6 Observation that low temperature non–tissue-destructive CRF application had results similar to high temperature tissue-destructive CRF generated immense interest. It was theorized that electrical currents rather than temperature determined the outcomes of CRF application.7 During pulsed RF (PRF), an attempt is made to maximize the delivery of electrical currents to the tissues by using higher voltage RF currents, and the risk of thermal tissue injury is minimized by maintaining the tissue temperatures below the neurodestructive range. These contradictory goals are achieved by applying the RF currents in a pulsatile manner to allow the heat to dissipate in between the RF pulses.8

Mechanism of Effect

Sluijter et al8 in their first description of PRF use described its possible mechanism of action. These authors assumed that by maintaining the electrode temperatures below the thermal destructive range that thermal tissue injury was obviated and the sustained high-density electrical fields that were generated stressed the biomolecules and caused cellular dysfunction and death. However, later investigators observed the slow response time of the temperature-measuring devices used during PRF application and concluded that the generation of brief high-temperature spikes could not be excluded, suggesting a combined role of electrical and thermal tissue injury.9,10 In laboratory studies, evidence of neuronal activation,11,12 cellular stress,13

Buy Membership for Anesthesiology Category to continue reading. Learn more here