Ocular prognosis of globe-conserving therapies

Treatment of primary choroidal melanoma without evidence of metastasis involves either globe-conserving therapy or enucleation. In a randomized clinical trial of patients with primary choroidal melanoma treated with globe-conserving iodine-125 brachytherapy versus enucleation, the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) demonstrated no significant difference in mortality, 5, 10, and 12 years following treatment between brachytherapy and enucleation.^1–3 Thus, increasing emphasis has been placed on globe-conserving therapy for choroidal melanoma. Reported rates of local treatment failure vary between treatment modalities and between centers using similar modalities. Radiation therapy overall results in lower rates of local treatment failure compared to nonradiation-based treatment approaches.

Nonradiation therapy

Nonradiation local treatment of uveal melanoma includes laser photocoagulation, Visudyne photodynamic therapy, and transpupillary thermotherapy. With a reduction in primary enucleation for choroidal melanoma, and a general trend toward eye-salvaging therapy, developments in nonradiation therapies continue to emerge. The main theoretical advantages of laser over radiation include minimizing collateral damage to healthy ocular tissues compared to radiation, minimizing radiation exposure to the patient and operator, and a more simplified treatment approach not requiring radiation oncology or use of an operating theater. However, laser overall has been found to be less successful in achieving local tumor control compared with most forms of radiation-based treatment. The literature is sparse on reports utilizing argon laser photocoagulation to treat choroidal melanomas, but there are many reports of failures, and the prevailing opinion is that argon laser is not an adequate primary treatment for choroidal melanoma of any size.^27–29 There are few reports of photodynamic therapy for uveal melanoma in the literature; only two case reports exist using this technique for small atypical amelanotic choroidal melanoma.^30,31 Barbazetto et al. reported a case series of four patients treated by photodynamic therapy with recurrent tumors treated with other modalities, resulting in eventual enucleation of two eyes.³²

Following the discontinuation of transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) as a therapy for age-related macular degeneration, a noticeable interest in this form of thermal laser for use in posterior segment tumors occurred. However, the largest series using TTT reported high rates of local treatment failure. Shields et al. reported a 22% local treatment failure rate at 3 years in a series of 256 posterior uveal melanoma treated by transpupillary thermotherapy.³³ Aaberg et al. reported a rate of 23% at 5 years in a series of 135 patients.³⁴ Zaldivar described eight cases with histologic findings in eyes enucleated after failed TTT. Although the height of the tumor decreased, extrascleral extension and lateral spread of the tumor ensued.³⁵ Harbour found that not only was there no significant difference in visual outcome between TTT and plaque radiotherapy, but also that the recurrences were substantially higher when TTT was used compared with iodine-125 plaque.³⁶ Currently, the use of TTT has been limited to an adjunct to primary brachytherapy to compensate for edge-miss in plaque placement by some operators.^37,38

Surgery

Surgical approaches involving excision of the tumor have been described using a transscleral approach (transscleral endoresection or local resection) or an internal approach with vitrectomy and resection of the tumor with the vitrectomy probe. The former technique may pose technical difficulties due to the requirement for systemic hypotensive anesthesia to reduce the risk of choroidal hemorrhage. In the reports described below, there are higher rates of ocular complications and a lower rate of overall globe retention comparing surgical transscleral endoresection to standard brachytherapy. Despite these significantly higher rates of local treatment failure and enucleation, there may be select cases where one might consider tumor resection over standard brachytherapy.

Peyman et al.³⁹ studied a group of 34 patients treated by eye wall resection with an average follow-up of 5.3 years and reported that 11 (32.3%) required enucleation (mainly because of evidence of tumor cells in resected margins) and 13 (38.2%) retained 20/200 or better vision after treatment. No patient had local treatment failure, and two patients had died of metastatic melanoma at the time of that report. In a matched case–control study, 81 of 49 pairs of patients undergoing either transscleral resection at one center or iodine brachytherapy at another, Kivela and colleagues found fewer recurrences with plaques than resection, but no difference in 8-year mortality.⁴⁰ Furthermore, only eyes undergoing radiation experienced neovascular glaucoma, radiation retinopathy, cataract or ischemic changes. Shields et al.⁴¹ described a series of 95 patients with choroidal or ciliary body tumors, or both, who were managed by partial lamellar sclerouvectomy. A total of 81 cases (85%) were uveal melanoma; vitreous hemorrhage occurred in 79 (83%); intraretinal or subretinal hemorrhage in 33 (35%); retinal detachment in 26 (28%), and cataract in 32 (34%) patients. Retinal detachment surgery was necessary in 16 patients (17%), and enucleation was necessary in 15 (16%) patients. Distant metastases developed in five patients (5%) with a median follow-up of 2.5 years. In the largest series of transscleral endoresection by Damato et al., the local treatment failure rate at 3 years was 20%.⁴² Puusaari et al. in a series of 33 patients reported a local treatment failure rate of 40% by 5 years.⁴³ Garcia-Arumi⁴⁴ reported in a series of 34 cases of vitrectomy with tumor endoresection with average follow-up of 70 months a local treatment failure rate of 5.8%, which is comparable with reports of others who have used vitrectomy with endoresection.^45,46

Systemic prognosis for metastasis and death

The most common site for metastasis in uveal melanoma is the liver. At least 50% of all patients diagnosed with uveal melanoma develop metastatic disease.⁴⁷ The COMS study reported liver metastasis with median survival once metastasis was diagnosed between 6 and 12 months.⁴⁸ In an analysis of metastatic uveal melanoma patients by Rietschel et al., the authors found that the most common nonhepatic first-metastatic site to be diagnosed was the lung.⁴⁹ Patients who were younger than age 60, had metastasis to the lung, had a longer interval between treatment of the melanoma and discovery of metastasis, had better survival after a diagnosis of metastatic disease.

There is a lack of substantial difference in survival for local globe-preserving therapies compared with enucleation in the early post-treatment years, which may be related to the possibility that metastases occur before the tumor is treated, perhaps before it is diagnosed.⁵⁰ Another consideration in evaluating the apparent similarity in survival outcome of conservative therapies in comparison with enucleation is that selection of patients with small- to medium-sized tumors and other more favorable prognostic indicators for eye-sparing treatment methods may bias survival results in favor of these therapies. It is therefore important to control for these prognostic factors to the extent possible in nonrandomized studies. A data collection and management system for studies of prognosis and treatment was developed in the 1980s in order to standardize these measures in observational cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, and was used to identify several factors relevant to metastasis.^51–54 In the initial studies evaluating prognosis after treatment with proton beam or enucleation,^53,54 the Cox proportional hazards model was first used in ophthalmology to study prognosis and survival after treatment of uveal melanoma. Epidemiologic methods were applied to standardize variables and control for differences in demographic factors as well as tumor-specific variables: tumor height, tumor diameter, location of the tumor posterior to the equator, anterior to the equator, and involvement of the ciliary body. Larger tumor size and anterior location decreased rate of survival, and treatment type did not have a significant effect. Length of observation period or evidence of growth prior to treatment has not been shown to affect prognosis. Visual outcomes after proton beam irradiation were also evaluated using these methods.^55,56

Prognosis after enucleation

Metastasis from uveal melanoma may occur at any time after the onset of tumor diagnosis. Jensen,⁷⁶ in his 25-year follow-up of Danish patients, found that the peak incidence of metastasis occurred during the first year after enucleation, and over half of those who developed metastasis did so within 3 years of treatment. However, it is a well-known but poorly understood fact that patients may develop metastasis decades after enucleation. Due to hypotheses that enucleation itself might cause increased mortality,⁷⁷ the COMS study compared enucleation to pre-enucleation radiation for large tumors, and did not find a difference in mortality.⁴⁷

Comprehensive and long-term studies of survival after enucleation derive from Denmark and Finland. These reports have the advantage of being population based with few losses to follow-up. Raivio compiled a roster of all patients diagnosed with uveal melanoma between 1923 and 1966 in Finland.⁷⁸ Of 359 identified cases, survival status at 10 years was known for all but five patients; 314 cases (89%) had 15 or more years of follow-up available, and 214 cases (60%) had at least 20 years. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates based on melanoma-related deaths were 65%, 52%, and 46%, respectively. Of the 42 patients who survived at least 20 years, nine later developed metastasis. Jensen⁷⁶ evaluated survival at least 25 years after enucleation in Danish patients with uveal melanoma. The majority of patients included in the original series had died (82%); 51% of those deaths were due to metastasis. Actuarial survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were similar to those reported by Raivio.⁷⁸ A novel deficit survival analysis of 230 patients in 1984 by Lavin and colleagues indicated no overall survival advantage after enucleation.⁷⁹

Metastasis from uveal melanoma usually occurs within the first few years after enucleation. The liver is usually the first site of metastasis after treatment.^80–83 There is some evidence to suggest that metastasis may occur several years before the diagnosis of hepatic metastasis is made.^50,84,85 Other organs that may be affected include the lung, bone, skin, and central nervous system.⁸² The majority of patients with hepatic involvement succumb within a few months of detection of the metastatic lesion.⁸³

Visual prognosis and ocular morbidity

Rates of complications and visual loss after radiation depend on the type of treatment and the size and location of the tumor within the eye. Severe complications requiring enucleation have been reported to occur in 10%⁸⁶ to 22%⁶⁵ of patients. Rubeosis iridis and neovascular glaucoma⁸⁷ and radiation retinopathy or optic neuropathy^60,81,88,89 have been reported as the major complications that may occur in irradiated eyes. Lens opacification is a common complication of helium ion⁹⁰ and proton beam⁹¹ radiotherapy, occurring in over 40% of cases in published series. Development of cataracts is also relatively common after episcleral plaque therapy^67,92,93 with reported 5-year incidence ranging from about 20%⁶⁷ to 37%.⁹³

Vision after proton beam irradiation has been studied,^55,56 and greater tumor thickness and proximity to the disc or macula (or high dose to these structures) were found to increase the risk of vision loss to worse than 20/200. Curves demonstrating cumulative probability of visual acuity loss according to height and distance of the tumor from the optic disc and fovea are presented in Figure 140.1. When patients were evaluated according to combined tumor characteristics, the probability of retaining vision of 20/200 or better at 3 years was 91% in the low-risk group (tumors 5 mm in height and more than two disc diameters from the macula and disc), 61% in the intermediate-risk group (tumors that were tall or close to the disc or macula), and 24% in the high-risk group (tumors that were tall and close to the disc or macula).

Fig. 140.1 Cumulative probability of visual acuity loss according to height and distance of the tumor from the optic disc and fovea. “Close” refers to less than or equal to two disc diameters, or approximately 3 mm from the structure.

(Reprinted from Seddon JM, Gragoudas ES, Polivogianis L et al. Enucleation vs cobalt 60 irradiation of melanomas. Ophthalmology 1986;93:666, with permission from the American Academy of Ophthalmology ©1986.)

Visual field deficits have also been demonstrated after proton beam irradiation.⁹⁴ Visual acuity outcomes similar to those in proton beam-irradiated patients were seen after iodine-125 plaque.⁹⁵ In a review of 93 patients undergoing plaque therapy for juxtapapillary lesions,⁷⁴