Principles of Infection Prevention and Control

Published on 01/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Pulmolory and Respiratory

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 4085 times

Principles of Infection Prevention and Control

Thomas G. Fraser

Health care–associated infections (HAIs) are infections that patients acquire during the course of medical treatment. In 2002, there were an estimated 1.7 million HAIs in U.S. hospitals accounting for 99,000 excess deaths.1 Approximately 5% of all patients admitted to a hospital develop an HAI, and 15% of HAIs are pneumonias.2,3 Approximately 25% of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation develop pneumonia as a complication, and approximately 30% of these patients die as a result of lung infection.4

The seminal Institute of Medicine report identified that medical errors may be the fifth leading cause of death in the United States, with up to 100,000 deaths annually.3 At the present time, there is increasing legislative and regulatory interest in patient safety, including a focus on HAIs. Health care professionals are giving increased attention to handwashing and protecting patients against infection. The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in China in 2002 and global spread with outbreaks in health care settings and transmission to large numbers of health care personnel and patients underscore the importance of consistent adherence to infection control precautions. Similarly, infection control practices were tested in 2009 by pandemic H1N1 influenza A, reinforcing the reality that new challenges continually arise.

Protecting patients and health care professionals against infections requires strict adherence to infection control procedures. Infection control procedures aim to eliminate the sources of infectious agents, create barriers to their transmission, and monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of control. Infection prevention is a major and ongoing responsibility of all health care workers, including respiratory therapists (RTs). To fulfill this responsibility, RTs must be able to select and apply various infection control procedures. This chapter provides the foundation needed to assume this important responsibility.

Spread of Infection

Three elements must be present for transmission of infection within a health care setting: (1) a source (or reservoir) of pathogens, (2) a susceptible host, and (3) a route of transmission for the pathogen (Figure 4-1).2

Susceptible Hosts

Susceptibility and resistance to infection vary greatly. Some individuals may be immune to infection or able to resist colonization. Others exposed to the same organism may carry it but show no symptoms. Other individuals may develop clinical disease. Host factors, such as poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, extremes of age, and underlying acquired (HIV infection) or iatrogenic (through chemotherapy or anti–tumor necrosis factor inhibitors) immunodeficiency, can enhance susceptibility to infection. Surgical incisions and radiation therapy impair defenses of the skin and organ space. Medical devices, such as urinary tract catheters, central venous catheters, and endotracheal tubes, allow pathogens to increase the risk of infection by impeding local host defenses and providing biofilms that may facilitate adherence of pathogens.

Hospital-acquired or nosocomial infections are infections that are acquired in the hospital. The high incidence of nosocomial gram-negative bacterial pneumonia is associated with factors that promote colonization of the pharynx with these organisms. Gram-negative colonization dramatically increases in critically ill patients, which increases the likelihood of the development of these pneumonias.4 Most nosocomial pneumonias occur in surgical patients, especially patients who have had chest or abdominal procedures. In these patients, normal swallowing and clearance mechanisms are impaired, allowing bacteria to enter and remain in the lower respiratory tract. Intubations, anesthesia, surgical pain, and use of narcotics and sedatives impair host defenses further. The risk of pneumonia is not the same for all surgical patients. Patients at the highest risk include elderly patients, severely obese patients, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or a history of smoking, and patients with an artificial airway in place for long periods.5

Patients with an artificial tracheal airway are at high risk for nosocomial pneumonia for several reasons. Typically, patients requiring prolonged intubation already have one or more factors predisposing to infection, such as severe COPD. Another risk factor may be increased upper airway colonization with gram-negative bacteria. Because the tube bypasses the normal protective mechanisms of the upper airway, bacteria have easy access to the lower respiratory tract. Finally, handling of these tubes increases the likelihood of cross contamination, particularly during suctioning.

Some pneumonias occur primarily in immunocompromised hosts. Physicians may purposefully suppress a patient’s immune response with drugs, as in organ transplant cases. Alternatively, immunosuppression may be a result of underlying disease, as with AIDS. Immunocompromised hosts, regardless of cause, are highly susceptible to infections, especially infections caused by opportunistic bacteria, fungi, or viruses.

Modes of Transmission

The three major routes for transmission of human sources of pathogens in the health care environment are contact (direct and indirect), respiratory droplets, and airborne droplet nuclei (respirable particles <5 µm). Table 4-1 provides examples of the common transmission routes for selected microorganisms.6

TABLE 4-1

Routes of Infectious Disease Transmission

Mode Type Examples
Contact Direct Hepatitis A
  HIV
  Staphylococcus
  Enteric bacteria
Indirect Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Enteric bacteria
    Hepatitis B and C
    HIV
Droplet Rhinovirus Haemophilus influenzae (type B) pneumonia and epiglottitis
SARS-associated coronavirus
Neisseria meningitidis pneumonia
Monkeypox Diphtheria
    Pertussis
    Streptococcal pneumonia
    Influenza
    Mumps
    Rubella
    Adenovirus
Vehicle Water-borne Shigellosis
  Cholera
Foodborne Salmonellosis
    Hepatitis A
Airborne Aerosols Legionellosis
Droplet nuclei Tuberculosis
    Varicella
    Measles
    Smallpox
Vector-borne Ticks and mites Rickettsia
  Lyme disease
Mosquitoes Malaria
Fleas Bubonic plague

image

Contact Transmission

Contact transmission is the most common route of transmission and is divided into two subgroups: direct and indirect. Direct contact transmission occurs when a pathogen is transferred directly from one person to another. Direct contact transmission occurs less frequently than indirect contact in the health care environment but is more efficient. An example of direct contact transmission would be development of respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis in a bone marrow transplant recipient owing to transmission of the virus from an ill health care worker who did not perform appropriate handwashing before providing care.

Indirect contact transmission is the most frequent mode of transmission in the health care environment and involves the transfer of a pathogen through a contaminated intermediate object or person. The most common indirect contact transmission in health care involves unwashed hands of health care personnel that touch an infected or a colonized body site on one patient or a contaminated inanimate object and subsequently touch another patient. Inanimate objects that may serve to transfer pathogens from one person to another are called fomites. Indirect contact transmission involving fomites can occur when instruments have been inadequately cleaned between patients before disinfection or sterilization.

Droplet Transmission

Droplet transmission is a form of contact transmission, but the mechanism of transfer of the pathogen is distinct, and additional prevention measures are required. Organisms that are transmitted by respiratory droplets include influenza and Neisseria meningitidis. Respiratory droplets are generated when an infected individual discharges large contaminated liquid droplets into the air by coughing, sneezing, or talking. Respiratory droplets are also generated during procedures such as suctioning, bronchoscopy, and cough induction. Transmission occurs when infectious droplets are propelled (usually ≤3 feet through the air) and are deposited on another person’s mouth or nose. Using the distance of 3 feet or less as a threshold for donning a mask has been effective in preventing transmission of infectious agents. However, experimental studies with smallpox and investigations of outbreaks of SARS suggest that droplets from infected patients rarely are able to reach a person 6 feet away.7 A distance of 3 feet or less around the patient is considered a short distance and is not used as a criterion for deciding when a mask should be donned to protect from exposure. Current Health Care Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) guidelines state it may be prudent to don a mask when within 6 feet of a patient or on entry into the room of a patient who is on droplet isolation.6

Airborne Transmission

Airborne transmission occurs via the spread of airborne droplet nuclei. These are small particles (≤5 µm) of evaporated droplets containing infectious microorganisms that can remain suspended in air for long periods. Microorganisms carried in this manner may be dispersed widely by air currents because of their small size and inhaled by susceptible hosts over a longer distance from the source patient compared with droplet transmission. Examples of pathogens transmitted via the airborne route include Mycobacterium tuberculosis, varicella-zoster virus (chickenpox), and rubeola virus (measles). Airborne transmission of variola (smallpox) has been documented, and airborne transmission of SARS, monkeypox, and viral hemorrhagic fever virus has been reported, although it has not been proved conclusively.6

Special air handling and ventilation and respiratory protection are required to prevent airborne transmission because microorganisms may remain suspended in air and be widely dispersed by air currents before contacting a susceptible host. In addition to airborne infection isolation rooms, personal respiratory protection with National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)–approved N-95 or higher respirators is required to prevent airborne transmission.6 A surgical mask, used for droplet precautions, is insufficient.

Infection Prevention Strategies

Creating a Safe Culture

Infection prevention programs are charged with identifying and categorizing HAIs and providing guidance to their organizations so that they can break the chain of events leading to these HAIs. Guidance and prevention efforts are directed at overall organizational structure and systems (“this is what we do as an institution to prevent infection”) and at the individual caregiver level (“this is what I do to prevent infection”). Infection prevention efforts can be divided into efforts that decrease host susceptibility, efforts that eliminate the source of pathogens, and efforts that interrupt the transmission routes. From an organizational perspective, a crucial step is the creation by leadership of a culture of safety wherein there is a shared commitment to patient and health care worker safety.

Organizations also endorse best practices for infection prevention by ensuring that the bedside caregiver has the appropriate time, equipment, and training to provide the best possible care. Effective health care workers execute appropriate practice on a daily basis, such as attention to hand hygiene and adherence to infection prevention bundles of care. The presence of appropriate systems to deliver care and a committed workforce consistently executing best practice are necessary for an organization to prevent infections reliably.

Decreasing Host Susceptibility

Decreasing inherent host susceptibility to infection is the most difficult and least feasible approach to infection control. Hospital efforts at this level focus mainly on employee immunization and chemoprophylaxis. Certain immunizations are recommended for susceptible health care personnel to decrease the risk of infection and the potential for transmission to patients and coworkers within the health care facility. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) mandates that employers offer hepatitis B vaccination. Vaccinations of health care workers in the absence of evidence of immunity against varicella, rubella, and measles should be encouraged.8 In addition, health care personnel in facilities that care for young infants and children should receive the adult acellular pertussis vaccine. Health care personnel without medical contraindications should also receive an annual influenza vaccination.9

Antimicrobial agents and topical antiseptics may be used to prevent outbreaks of selected pathogens. Postexposure chemoprophylaxis is recommended under defined circumstances for Bordetella pertussis (whooping cough), N. meningitidis (meningococcal meningitis), Bacillus anthracis (anthrax), influenza virus, HIV, and group A streptococci.6

A large percentage of HAIs are due to device-related infections, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), catheter-related bloodstream infection, and catheter-associated urinary tract infection. The best way to decrease host susceptibility to a device-related infection is first to limit device use and second to ensure that devices are placed and maintained appropriately. Prevention bundles—defined as the use of multiple different evidence-based best practices to prevent device-related infection—have been shown to decrease the incidence of HAIs significantly.10,11 Boxes 4-1 and 4-2 list the components of the central line bundle for vascular catheter placement and the VAP bundle. Institutions should be committed to these processes of care, and individual health care workers should be familiar with these practices and execute them on a routine basis.12,13

Eliminating the Source of Pathogens

It is impossible to eliminate all pathogens from any working environment. Nonetheless, standard infection control procedures always include efforts to eliminate pathogens, and recommended practices for cleaning and disinfecting noncritical surfaces in patient care areas should be followed. Infection control procedures designed to remove environmental pathogens fall into two major categories: general sanitation measures and specialized equipment processing.

If the environment is dirty, all other infection control efforts are futile. General sanitation measures help to keep the overall environment clean. General sanitation aims to reduce the number of pathogens to a safe level. This reduction is achieved through sanitary laundry management, food preparation, and housekeeping. Environmental control of the air (using specialized ventilation systems) and water complements these efforts.

The goal of specialized equipment processing is to decontaminate equipment capable of spreading infection. Equipment processing involves cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization (when necessary). Methods that kill bacteria are bactericidal, whereas methods and techniques that inhibit the growth of bacteria are bacteriostatic. Methods that destroy spores are sporicidal, and methods that destroy viruses are virucidal.

Standard Precautions

Standard precautions are intended to be applied to the care of all patients in all health care settings all the time. This is the primary strategy for the prevention of health care–associated transmission of infections among patients and health care personnel. From a health care worker protection perspective, application of standard precautions on a routine basis is recognition that all blood, body fluids, secretions, and excretions with the exception of sweat and urine may contain transmissible infectious agents. To mitigate against this risk, a health care worker should employ personal protective equipment (PPE). PPE refers to various barriers and respirators used alone or in combination to protect mucous membranes, skin, and clothing from contact with infectious agents. Gloves, gowns, masks, eye protection, and face shields should be employed depending on the anticipated exposure.

The application of standard precautions by health care personnel during patient care depends on the nature of the interaction and the extent of anticipated blood, body fluid, or pathogen contact. For some patient care situations, only gloves are required. In other cases, gloves, gowns, and face shield may be required. Box 4-3 describes standard precautions, including hand hygiene; use of gloves, masks, and eye protection; equipment handling; and patient placement.

Box 4-3   Standard Precautions

Occupational Health and Blood-Borne Pathogens

Exercise extreme caution when handling needles, scalpels, and other sharp instruments or devices; when cleaning used instruments; and when disposing of used needles.

Never recap used needles, handle them using both hands, or point toward any part of the body.

Do not remove used needles from disposable syringes by hand, and do not bend, break, or otherwise manipulate used needles by hand.

Place used disposable syringes and needles, scalpel blades, and other sharp items in appropriate puncture-resistant containers; place reusable syringes and needles in a puncture-resistant container for transport to the reprocessing area.

Use mouthpieces, resuscitation bags, or other ventilation devices as an alternative to mouth-to-mouth resuscitation methods in areas where the need for resuscitation is predictable.

Hand Hygiene

The importance of hand hygiene to reduce the transmission of infectious agents cannot be overemphasized and is an essential element of standard precautions.14 Hand hygiene includes handwashing with either plain or antiseptic-containing soap and water for at least 15 seconds and the use of alcohol-based products (gels, rinses, and foams) containing an emollient that does not require the use of water. In the absence of visible soiling of hands, approved alcohol-based products are preferred over antimicrobial or plain soap and water because of their superior microbicidal activity, reduced drying of skin, and convenience. The quality of performing hand hygiene can be affected by the type and length of fingernails and by wearing jewelry. Artificial fingernails and extenders are discouraged because of their association with infections.14 Figure 4-2 illustrates the proper technique for handwashing.

Gloves

Gloves protect both patients and health care workers from exposure to pathogens that may be carried on the hands of health care workers. Gloves protect caregivers from contamination when contacting blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions, mucous membranes, and nonintact skin of patients and when handling or touching visibly or potentially contaminated patient care equipment and environmental surfaces.14

Caregivers should wear sterile gloves whenever performing invasive procedures. A single pair of nonsterile disposable gloves (e.g., latex, vinyl, nitrile) may be used for routine patient care. Gloves should be changed, regardless of use, between each patient contact and after any direct contact with infectious material, even if in the middle of a procedure. After removing the gloves, caregivers must always wash their hands. Gloves may have small, invisible defects or may be torn during use. The hands can be contaminated during removal of the gloves. For these reasons, the wearing of gloves should never be used as a substitute for handwashing.

Respiratory Protection

Respiratory protection (use of NIOSH-approved N-95 or higher level respirator) is intended for diseases (e.g., M. tuberculosis, SARS, smallpox) that could be transmitted through the airborne route.6 The term respiratory protection has a regulatory context that includes components of a program required by OSHA to protect workers: (1) medical clearance to wear a respirator, (2) provision and use of appropriate NIOSH-approved fit-tested respirators, and (3) education in respirator use. Information on types of respirators can be found at www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/respirators/respsars.html.

Gowns, Aprons, and Protective Apparel

Isolation gowns and other apparel (aprons, leg coverings, boots, or shoe covers) also provide barrier protection and can prevent the contamination of clothing and exposed body areas from blood and body fluid contact and transmissible pathogens (e.g., respiratory syncytial virus and Clostridium difficile). Selection of protective apparel is dictated by the nature of the interaction of the health care worker with the patient, including anticipated degree of body contact with infectious material.6 In most instances, gowns are worn only if contact with blood and body fluid is likely. Clinical coats and jackets worn over clothing are not considered protective apparel. Isolation gowns should always be donned with gloves and other protective equipment as indicated. As with gloves and masks, a gown should be worn only once and then discarded. In most situations, aseptically clean, freshly laundered, or disposable gowns are satisfactory.

The emergence of SARS and the ongoing concerns for pandemic infection have led to a strategy of preventing transmission of respiratory infections at the first point of contact within a health care setting (e.g., physician’s office) termed respiratory hygiene/cough etiquette that is intended to be incorporated into infection control practices as one component of standard precautions.6 The elements of respiratory hygiene/cough etiquette include (1) education of health care personnel, patients, and visitors; (2) posted signs in language appropriate to the population served with instructions for patients and accompanying family members or friends; (3) source control measures (covering the mouth and nose with a tissue when coughing or placing a surgical mask on a coughing person when possible); (4) hand hygiene after contact with respiratory secretions; and (5) spatial separation (≥3 feet from persons with respiratory infections in common waiting areas).

Transmission-Based Precautions

Transmission-based precautions are for patients who are known or suspected to be infected with pathogens that require additional control measures to prevent transmission. There are three categories of transmission-based precautions: contact precautions, droplet precautions, and airborne infection isolation. Whether used singularly or in combination, these precautions are always used in addition to standard precautions.6

Contact precautions are intended to reduce the risk of transmission by direct or indirect contact with the patient or the patient’s environment. Contact precautions intend for spatial separation of infected or colonized patients (≥3 feet between beds), and health care personnel and visitors wear gowns and gloves for all interactions that may involve contact with the patient or the patient’s environment. Contact precautions are most commonly employed to decrease the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms such as C. difficile. Contact precautions are described in Box 4-4.

Droplet precautions are used to prevent a form of contact transmission that occurs when droplets are propelled short distances (≤3 feet through the air). Droplets are often generated with coughing, sneezing, suctioning, bronchoscopy, and cough induction. Health care personnel and visitors should don a mask during all interactions that may involve contact with such patients. Droplet precautions are employed for patients with presumed or confirmed infection with organisms known to be transmitted by respiratory droplets such as influenza. Droplet precautions are described in Box 4-5. Precautions for use when performing cough-inducing and aerosol-producing procedures are described in Box 4-6.

Airborne Infection Isolation

AI refers to isolation techniques intended to reduce the risk of selected infectious agents transmitted by “small droplets” of aerosol particles (e.g., M. tuberculosis).6 Persons who enter an AI room must wear respiratory protection (an NIOSH-approved N-95 or higher respirator). Patients should be placed in a single-patient AI room that is equipped with special air handling and ventilation capacity that meets the American Institute of Architects/Facility Guidelines Institute standards (monitored negative pressure relative to surrounding area, two air exchanges per hour, and air exhausted directly to the outside or recirculated through high-efficiency particulate air/aerosol [HEPA] filtration). In settings where AI cannot be implemented because of limited resources, one should implement physical separation, mask patients, and provide respiratory protection for health care personnel to reduce the likelihood of airborne transmission. Box 4-7 describes airborne precautions that should be used in addition to standard precautions.

Protective Environment

A specialized engineering approach to protect highly immunocompromised patients is a protective environment. A protective environment is used for patients with allogeneic hematologic stem cell transplants to minimize fungal spore counts in the air.15 The rationale for such controls has been studies showing outbreaks of aspergillosis associated with construction. Air quality for patients with hematologic stem cell transplants is improved through a combination of environmental controls that include (1) HEPA filtration of incoming air, (2) directed room airflow, (3) positive room air pressure relative to the corridor, (4) well-sealed rooms to prevent infiltration of outside air, (5) ventilation to provide 12 or more air changes per hour, (6) strategies to reduce dust, and (7) prohibition of dried and fresh flowers and potted plants in rooms.

Patient Placement

It is increasingly thought that single-occupancy rooms increase patient safety; reduce infection, injuries, falls, and medical errors; and reduce sources of environmental stress (e.g., noise). However, most facilities are not single occupancy only, and patient placement in private rooms is prioritized for patients who have conditions that may result in the transmission of infections to other patients or who are at increased risk for acquisition of HAIs.

Single-patient rooms are always indicated for patients on AI and in a protective environment. Single-patient rooms are preferred for patients who require contact precautions (e.g., C. difficile) or droplet precautions (e.g., influenza).

Cohorting is a practice of grouping patients with the same infection (or colonized with the same organism) together to confine care geographically and prevent transmission to other patients. Cohorting based on the presenting clinical syndrome is commonly used in pediatric hospitals during respiratory syncytial virus/influenza season. Cohorting health care workers to care only for patients infected or colonized with a particular transmissible pathogen may also limit transmission to uninfected patients.

Transport of Infected Patients

By limiting the transport of patients with contagious disease, the risk of cross infection can be reduced. However, infected patients sometimes do need to be transported, and when that occurs, the patient needs to wear appropriate barrier protection (mask, gown, impervious dressings) consistent with the route and risk for transmission.6 Health care personnel receiving the patient need to be notified of the patient’s impending arrival and what infection control measures are required.

Mini Clini

Spread of Infection

Discussion

In hospitals, S. aureus commonly colonizes the skin of both health care professionals and visitors. Neonates are also very susceptible hosts because of their poor immunity. Staphylococcus infections spread mainly via direct contact transmission (see Table 4-1). To help prevent the spread of this infection to the newborn infants, you should try to disrupt the transmission route. Meticulous attention to hand hygiene and use of gloves would help. In addition, you could isolate the infected neonates from uninfected infants (cohorting) and begin swabbing the umbilicus and nares of all infants in the NICU and all new admissions to identify who may be colonized with S. aureus.

Disinfection and Sterilization

Medical instruments are used in tens of millions of procedures in the United States every year. When properly performed, cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization procedures can reduce the risk of infection associated with the use of invasive and noninvasive medical instruments. Although a detailed review of disinfection and sterilization is beyond the scope of this chapter, overall principles are discussed, particularly as they pertain to the use of bronchoscopes. The interested reader is referred to detailed guidance available from the CDC.16 Table 4-2 lists definitions of the steps involved in equipment reprocessing.

TABLE 4-2

Equipment Processing Definitions

Term Definition
Cleaning Removal of all foreign material (e.g., soil, organic material) from objects
Disinfection (general term) Inactivation of most pathogenic organisms, excluding spores
Disinfection, low-level Inactivation of most bacteria, some viruses, and fungi, without destruction of resistant microorganisms such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis or bacterial spores
Disinfection, intermediate-level Inactivation of all vegetative bacteria, most viruses, most fungi, and M. tuberculosis, without destruction of bacterial spores
Disinfection, high-level Inactivation of all microorganisms except bacterial spores (with sufficient exposure times, spores may also be destroyed)
Sterilization Complete destruction of all forms of microbial life

Bronchoscopes routinely become contaminated with high levels of organisms during a procedure because of the body cavities in which they are used. The benefits of these medical devices are numerous; however, proper reprocessing is crucial because numerous outbreaks and pseudooutbreaks owing to improper procedures have been described. Individuals responsible for bronchoscope reprocessing should receive initial and annual training, and their competency should be ensured. The five key components to bronchoscope reprocessing are cleaning, disinfecting, rinsing, drying, and storage (Box 4-8).16 Automated bronchoscope reprocessors (ABRs) offer many advantages over manual disinfection because they automate several steps. Regardless of whether disinfection is done manually or with an ABR, personnel responsible for this task need to ensure reprocessing is done per device manufacturer and reprocessor guidelines with products approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Spaulding Approach to Disinfection and Sterilization of Patient Care Equipment

In 1968, Spaulding published his approach to disinfection and sterilization, which was based on the degree of risk of infection involved in the use of the item in patient care.17 The three categories he described were critical, semicritical, and noncritical (Table 4-3). Critical items are categorized based on the high risk of infection if such an item is contaminated with pathogens, including bacterial spores (e.g., items that enter sterile tissue or the vascular system). Critical devices enter normally sterile tissues. Most of these items should be purchased sterile or be sterilized, by steam sterilization if possible. Semicritical items come into contact with mucous membranes or nonintact skin; this includes most respiratory equipment. These items should be free of all microorganisms before use (bacterial spores may be present). Semicritical items require at least high-level disinfection using chemical disinfectants. Noncritical items come into contact with intact skin (an effective barrier to most microbes) but not mucous membranes. Most noncritical reusable devices may be decontaminated where they are used (e.g., bedpans, patient bed rails).

TABLE 4-3

Processing of Medical Equipment According to Infection Risk Categories

Category Description Examples Processing
Critical Devices introduced into the bloodstream or other parts of the body Surgical devices Sterilization
Intravascular catheters  
Implants  
Heart-lung bypass components  
Dialysis components  
Bronchoscope forceps/brushes  
Semicritical Devices that directly or indirectly contact mucous membranes Bronchoscopes
Oral, nasal, and tracheal airways
High-level disinfection
    Ventilator circuits/humidifiers  
    PFT mouthpieces and tubing  
    Nebulizers and their reservoirs  
    Resuscitation bags  
    Laryngoscope blades/stylets  
    Pressure, gas, or temperature probes  
Noncritical Devices that touch only intact skin or do not contact patient Face masks Detergent washing
Blood pressure cuffs Low- to intermediate-level disinfection
Ventilators

image

PFT, Pulmonary function testing.

Modified from Chatburn RL, Kallstrom TJ, Bajasouzian S: A comparison of acetic acid with a quartinary ammonium compound for disinfection of hand-held nebulizers. Resp Care 34:98-109, 1989.

Cleaning

Medical equipment must be cleaned and maintained according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Noncritical items, such as commodes, intravenous pumps, and ventilator surfaces, must be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected before use with another patient. Cleaning is the first step in all equipment processing. Cleaning involves removing dirt and organic material from equipment, usually by washing (see Table 4-3).16 Failure to clean equipment properly can render all subsequent processing efforts ineffective. Cleaning should occur in a designated facility with separate dirty and clean areas. Before being cleaned, the equipment should be disassembled and examined for worn parts. Complete disassembly helps ensure good exposure to the cleaning agent. After disassembly, the parts should be placed in a clean basin filled with hot water and soap, detergent, or enzymatic cleaners.

Because water alone cannot dissolve organic matter, soaps or detergents should be used to clean equipment. Soaps act by reducing surface tension and forming an emulsion with organic matter. Soaps have little bactericidal activity and work poorly in hard water. A detergent refers to a substance (usually a chemical agent but sometimes a physical one) applied to inanimate objects that destroys disease-causing pathogens but not spores. Detergents work in hard water but can be inactivated by proteins. Most detergents are weakly bactericidal but against gram-positive bacteria only. Some commercial products combine a germicide with a detergent, providing the dual action of cleaning and disinfection. Although careful cleaning removes most pathogens from the equipment, it cannot eliminate the risk of infection. For this reason, most equipment must undergo either disinfection or sterilization.

Disinfection

Disinfection describes a process that destroys the vegetative form of all pathogenic organisms on an inanimate object except bacterial spores. By definition, disinfection differs from sterilization by its lack of sporicidal activity.16 However, a few disinfectants kill spores with prolonged exposure times (hours) and are called chemical sterilants. Disinfection can involve either physical or chemical methods. The most common physical method of disinfection is pasteurization. Many chemical methods are used to disinfect respiratory care equipment.

Chemical Disinfection

Chemical disinfection involves the application of chemical solutions to contaminated surfaces or equipment. For disinfection, the equipment is immersed in the solution. After a set “contact” time, the equipment is removed, rinsed in sterile water (to remove toxic residues), and dried. Equipment must be handled aseptically, with sterile gloves and towels, to prevent recontamination during subsequent reassembly and packaging. The FDA provides a list of cleared chemical disinfectants that can be used for high-level disinfection of medical devices. Cleared agents include agents that are 2.4% or greater glutaraldehyde, 0.55% ortho-phthaladehyde (OPA), 0.95% glutaraldehyde with 1.64% phenolphenate, 7.35% hydrogen peroxide with 0.23% peracetic acid, 1.0% hydrogen peroxide with 0.08% peracetic acid, and 7.5% hydrogen peroxide.16 The choice of agent is dictated by device and in many cases recommendations of the ABR manufacturer.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency groups disinfectants based on whether the product label claims “limited,” “general,” or “hospital” disinfection.16 Numerous disinfectants are used alone or in combination in the health care setting, including alcohol, chlorine and chlorine products, glutaraldehyde, iodophors, phenolics, quaternary ammonium compounds, peracetic acid, and hydrogen peroxide. In most cases, a given product is designed for a specific purpose and should be used in a certain manner; the label should be read carefully. Table 4-4, excerpted from the CDC guideline for sterilization and disinfection, summarizes common chemical disinfectants and their activity against various pathogens.16 Health care facilities should select disinfectant agents that best meet their overall needs. Recommendations for the amount, dilution, and contact time of disinfectants should be followed. A comprehensive overview of disinfectants in the hospital can be found in the updated CDC guidelines for disinfection and sterilization in health care facilities.16

TABLE 4-4

Comparison of the Characteristics of Selected Chemicals Used as High-Level Disinfectants or Chemical Sterilants

  HP (7.5%) PA (0.2%) Glut (≥2.0%) OPA (0.55%) HP/PA (7.35%/0.23%)
HLD claim 30 min at 20° C NA 20-90 min at 20°-25° C 12 min at 20° C, 5 min at 25° C in AER 15 min at 20° C
Sterilization claim 6 hr at 20° C 12 min at 50°-56° C 10 hr at 20°-25° C None 3 hr at 20° C
Activation No No Yes (alkaline glut) No No
Reuse lifea 21 days Single use 14-30 days 14 days 14 days
Shelf life stabilityb 2 yr 6 mo 2 yr 2 yr 2 yr
Disposable restrictions None None Localc Localc None
Materials compatibility Good Good Excellent Excellent No data
Monitor MECd Yes (6%) No Yes (≥1.5%) Yes (0.3% OPA) No
Safety Serious eye damage (safety glasses) Serious eye and skin damage (conc soln)e Respiratory Eye irritant, stains skin Eye damage
Processing Manual or automated Automated Manual or automated Manual or automated Manual
Organic material resistance Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
OSHA exposure limit 1 ppm TWA None Nonef None HP-1 ppm TWA
Cost profile (per cycle)g + (manual), ++ (automated) ++++ (automated) + (manual), ++ (automated) ++ (manual) ++ (manual)

image

HLD, High level-disinfectant; HP, hydrogen peroxide; NA, not applicable; OPA, ortho-phthalaldehyde (FDA cleared as a high-level disinfectant, included for comparison with other chemical agents used for high-level disinfection); PA, peracetic acid; glut, glutaraldehyde; PA/HP, peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide; TWA, time-weighted average for a conventional 8-hour workday.

aNumber of days a product can be reused as determined by reuse protocol.

bTime a product can remain in storage (unused).

cNo U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations, but some states and local authorities have additional restrictions.

dMinimum effective concentration (MEC) is the lowest concentration of active ingredients at which the product is still effective.

eConc soln, concentrated solution.

fThe ceiling limit recommended by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists is 0.05 ppm.

gPer cycle cost profile considers cost of the processing solution (suggested list price to health care facilities in August 2001) and assumes maximum use life (e.g., 21 days for hydrogen peroxide, 14 days for glutaraldehyde), five reprocessing cycles per day, 1-gallon basin for manual processing, and 4-gallon tank for automated processing. + = least expensive; ++++ = most expensive.

Data from Rutala WA, Weber DJ and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Guidelines for sterilization and disinfection in healthcare facilities, Atlanta, GA, 2008, www.edu.gov./hicpac/.pdf/guidelines.

Sterilization

Sterilization destroys all microorganisms on the surface of an article or in a fluid, which prevents transmission of pathogens associated with the use of that item. Both physical and chemical means can achieve sterilization. Physical methods include various forms of heat (steam) and ionizing radiation. Chemical methods of sterilization include low-temperature sterilization technologies such as ethylene oxide (EtO) gas. Table 4-5, excerpted from the CDC guideline for sterilization and disinfection, compares and contrasts the major methods of sterilization.16

TABLE 4-5

Advantages and Disadvantages of Accepted Methods for Equipment Sterilization

Sterilization Method Advantages Disadvantages
Steam Nontoxic to patient, staff, environment
Cycle easy to control and monitor
Rapidly microbial
Least affected by organic/inorganic soils among sterilization processes listed
Rapid cycle time
Penetrates medical packing, device lumens
Deleterious for heat-sensitive instruments
Microsurgical instruments damaged by repeated exposure
May leave instruments wet, causing them to rust
Potential for burns
Hydrogen peroxide gas plasma Safe for the environment
Leaves no toxic residuals
Cycle time is 28-75 min (varies with model type) and no aeration necessary
Used for heat- and moisture-sensitive items because process temperature <50° C
Simple to operate, install (208 V outlet), and monitor
Compatible with most medical devices
Requires electrical outlet only
Cellulose (paper), linens, and liquids cannot be processed
Sterilization chamber size from 1.8-9.4 ft3 total volume (varies with model type)
Some endoscopes or medical devices with long or narrow lumens cannot be processed at this time in the United States (see manufacturer’s recommendations for internal diameter and length restrictions)
Requires synthetic packaging (polypropylene wraps, polyolefin pouches) and special container tray
Hydrogen peroxide may be toxic at levels >1 ppm TWA
100% EtO Penetrates packaging materials, device lumens
Single-dose cartridge and negative pressure chamber minimizes potential for gas leak and EtO exposure
Simple to operate and monitor
Compatible with most medical materials
Requires aeration time to remove EtO residue
Sterilization chamber size 4.0-7.9 ft3 total volume (varies with model type)
EtO is toxic, a carcinogen, and flammable
EtO emission regulation by states but catalytic cell removes 99.9% of EtO and converts it to CO2 and H2O
EtO cartridges should be stored in flammable liquid storage cabinet
Lengthy cycle/aeration time
EtO mixtures: 8.6% EtO/91.4% HCFC; 10% EtO/90% HCFC; 8.5% EtO/91.5% CO2 Penetrates medical packaging and many plastics
Compatible with most medical materials
Cycle easy to control and monitor
Some states (e.g., California, New York, Michigan) require EtO emission reduction of 90%-99.9%
CFC (inert gas that eliminates explosive hazard) banned in 1995
Potential hazards to staff and patients
Lengthy cycle/alteration time
EtO is toxic, a carcinogen, and flammable
Peracetic acid Rapid cycle time (30-45 min)
Low temperature (50°-55° C) liquid immersion sterilization
Environmentally friendly by-products
Sterilant flows through endoscope, which facilitates salt, protein, and microbe removal
Point-of-use system, no sterile storage
Biologic indicator may be unsuitable for routine monitoring
Used for immersible instruments only
Some material incompatibility (e.g., aluminum anodized coating becomes dull)
One scope or a small number of instruments processed in a cycle
Potential for serious eye and skin damage (concentrated solution) with contact

CFC, Chlorofluorocarbon; HCFC, hydrochlorofluorocarbon.

Data from Rutala WA, Weber DJ and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Guidelines for sterilization and disinfection in healthcare facilities, Atlanta, GA, 2008, www.edu.gov./hicpac/.pdf/guidelines.

Medical devices that have contact with sterile body tissues or fluids are crucial items and should be sterile before use. If the object is heat resistant, steam sterilization is usually recommended. However, increases in the use of medical devices that are heat and moisture sensitive have necessitated the development of low-temperature sterilization technology. These include, but are not limited to, EtO, hydrogen peroxide gas plasma, and peracetic acid. A review of the commonly used sterilization technologies with a summary of advantages and disadvantages can be found in the updated CDC guidelines for disinfection and sterilization in health care facilities.16 Following is an overview of a few of these technologies.

Steam Sterilization

Moist heat in the form of steam under pressure is the most common, most efficient, and easiest sterilization method. Generally, the higher the temperature, the shorter is the time needed for sterilization. Autoclaving (steam sterilization) is the application of steam under pressure. Autoclaving is efficient, quick, cheap, clean, and reliable. The higher the temperature and pressure, the shorter is the time needed for sterilization. The combination most commonly used for autoclaving is 15 psi at 121° C. Equipment must be cleaned before autoclaving. Clean equipment is wrapped in muslin, linen, or paper, all of which is easily penetrated by steam. Items must be properly packed in the autoclave to ensure exposure. In addition, chamber air must be evacuated before steam is introduced. After sterilization, the packaging prevents recontamination during handling and storage.

Flash Sterilization

Flash “steam sterilization” is a modification of conventional steam sterilization in which the item is placed in an open tray or a specially designed container to allow for rapid penetration of steam.16 It is considered an acceptable practice for processing cleaned patient care items that cannot be packaged, sterilized, and stored before use. Its use only for reasons of convenience (e.g., to save time) should be discouraged.

Low-Temperature Sterilization Technologies

Low-temperature (<60° C) sterilants are needed for sterilizing temperature-sensitive and moisture-sensitive medical devices and equipment. Low-temperature sterilant technology includes EtO, hydrochlorofluorocarbon, hydrogen peroxide gas plasma, and peracetic acid.16 We review the most commonly used process—EtO.

EtO is a colorless, toxic gas and potent sterilizing agent. Because it is active at ambient temperatures and is harmless to rubber and plastics, EtO is a good sterilant for items that cannot be autoclaved. Similar to steam, EtO penetrates most packaging materials, permitting prewrapping. Were it not for its many hazards, EtO would be the ideal sterilant.18 Acute exposure to EtO gas can cause airway inflammation, nausea, diarrhea, headache, dizziness, and convulsions. Chronic exposure to the gas is associated with respiratory infections, anemia, and altered behavior. Residual EtO left on processed equipment can cause tissue inflammation and hemolysis. When combined with water, EtO forms ethylene glycol, which also can irritate tissues. Other potential problems include carcinogenic, mutagenic, and teratogenic effects. EtO concentrations greater than 3% are explosive.

EtO requires special attention to general safety precautions, equipment preparation, and sterilization cycle parameters. In addition, because of its toxicity, residual EtO must be removed from equipment after sterilization via a process called aeration. EtO is used to sterilize critical (and sometimes semicritical) items that cannot be steam sterilized.

Equipment Handling Procedures

Equipment handling procedures that help prevent the spread of pathogens include maintenance of in-use equipment, processing of reusable equipment, application of one-patient-use disposables, and fluid and medication precautions.

Maintenance of In-Use Equipment

In-use respiratory care equipment that can spread pathogens includes nebulizers, ventilator circuits, bag-valve-mask devices (manual resuscitators), and suction equipment. Oxygen therapy and pulmonary function equipment are also implicated as potential sources of nosocomial infections.

Nebulizers

Small volume medication nebulizers (SVNs) can also produce bacterial aerosols. SVNs have been associated with nosocomial pneumonia, including Legionnaires’ disease, resulting from either contaminated medications or contaminated tap water used to rinse the reservoir. Procedures designed to prevent nebulizers from spreading pathogens are presented in Box 4-9.

Ventilators and Ventilator Circuits

The internal workings of ventilators are uncommon sources for infection; this is partly a result of the widespread use of high-efficiency particulate air/aerosol (HEPA) filters, which have an efficiency rate of 99.97%, and the use of ensheathed suction catheters, which help reduce endotracheal tube contamination. An inspiratory HEPA filter (placed between the machinery and the external circuit, proximal to any humidifier) can eliminate bacteria from the driving gas and prevent retrograde contamination back into the machine. An expiratory filter using a heated thermistor to prevent condensation performs the same function and still protects the internal ventilator components. Expiratory filters also prevent pathogens from being expelled into the surroundings from the patient’s expired air.

The external ventilator circuitry poses the most significant contamination risk, particularly in systems using heated humidifiers. The humidifiers themselves are rarely the problem. Bubble or wick designs produce little or no aerosol and pose minimal infection risk. In addition, heating the humidifier reduces or eliminates growth of most bacterial pathogens. However, because tap water or distilled water may harbor heat-resistant pathogens, sterile water should still be used to fill bubble-type humidifiers.

The primary problem stems from contaminated condensate in the inspiratory limb of the ventilator circuit. Most often, the source of this contamination is the patient. Spillage of contaminated condensate into the patient circuit and the patient occurs when moving the tubing or the patient, increasing the risk of autogenous infection. In addition, microorganisms in this condensate can be transmitted to other patients via the hands of the health care worker handling the fluid, if he or she is negligent. This is another reason why it is crucial for RTs to practice hand hygiene before and after contact with every ventilated patient. Contact with the patient’s ventilator is considered contact with the patient’s body.

One way to address this problem is by reducing or eliminating circuit condensation. This reduction or elimination is easily achieved using heated wire circuits or a heat-and-moisture exchanger (HME). Evidence suggests that to prevent bacterial colonization, even if the HME remains free of secretions, the maximal duration that it may be used is 96 hours (4 days).19

Based on current knowledge, both the CDC and the American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC) developed guidelines addressing ventilator-associated infection control. Box 4-10 provides general procedures for minimizing nosocomial infection associated with ventilator use. Mechanical ventilation exposes the patient to the risk of VAP, and the frequency of circuit changes and the relationship to VAP have been investigated.20,21 Current guidelines suggest that ventilator circuits should not be changed routinely for infection control purposes; however, they should be changed when visibly soiled or malfunctioning.

4-1   Care of the Ventilator Circuit and Its Relationship to Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

AARC Clinical Practice Guideline (Excerpts)*

Introduction

A concern related to the care of a mechanically ventilated patient is the development of VAP. For many years, this concern focused on the ventilator circuit and humidifier. The circuit and humidifier have been changed on a regular basis in an attempt to decrease the VAP rate. However, as the evidence evolved, it became apparent that the origin of VAP is more likely from sites other than the ventilator circuit, and the prevailing practice has become one of changing circuits less frequently. If this practice is safe, it would offer substantial cost savings. Other issues related to the components of the circuit and VAP have also become more important recently. Humidification systems can be either active or passive. Increasingly, in-line suction is used, and this becomes part of the ventilator circuit.

Questions

A systematic review of the literature was conducted with the intention of making recommendations for change frequency of the ventilator circuit and additional components of the circuit. Specifically, the Writing Committee wrote these evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to address the following questions:

Recommendations


*For the complete guidelines, see AARC Clinical Practice Guidelines, Care of the ventilator circuit and its relation to ventilator-associated pneumonia. Respir Care 48:569–879, 2003.

Bag-Mask Devices

Bag-mask devices are a source for colonizing both the airways of intubated patients and the hands of medical personnel.22 Nondisposable bag-mask devices should be sterilized or high-level disinfected between patients. In addition, the exterior surface of any bag-mask device should be cleaned of visible debris and disinfected at least once a day.

Suction Systems

Tracheal suctioning increases the risk of infection. Proper handwashing and gloving help minimize this risk. Although much has been made of the infection control advantages of ensheathed suction systems over open tracheal suction systems, evidence shows neither system to be clearly superior.4 To minimize the risk of cross contamination during suctioning with an open system, a fresh, sterile single-use catheter should be used on each patient. In addition, only sterile fluid should be used to remove secretions from the catheter. Last, both the suction collection tubing and collection canister should be changed between patients except in short-term care units, where only the collection tubing needs to be changed.

Oxygen Therapy Apparatus

Oxygen therapy devices pose much less risk than other in-use equipment but are still a potential infection hazard. In-use nondisposable oxygen humidifiers have a contamination rate of 33%. Conversely, prefilled, sterile disposable humidifiers present a negligible infection risk.23 On the basis of this knowledge, procedures that can help prevent oxygen therapy apparatus from spreading pathogens are outlined in Box 4-11.

Other Respiratory Care Devices

Use of other respiratory care equipment, including oxygen analyzers, the hand-held bedside respirometer, and circuit probes, has been linked with hospital outbreaks of gram-negative bacterial infections.4 The most likely transmission route is direct patient-to-patient contact via either the device itself or the contaminated hands of caregivers. The best way to control this problem is with proper handwashing and sterilization or high-level disinfection of the devices between patients.

Processing Reusable Equipment

Improperly processed reusable equipment is another potential source for pathogens. General principles for cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization were provided previously. This section presents specific guidelines for processing reusable respiratory care equipment and a special section on bronchoscope disinfection.

Respiratory Care Equipment

Several factors must be considered in selecting a processing method for reusable respiratory care equipment (Box 4-12). When a device’s risk category is known, its composition must be matched to the resources available for hospital disinfection and sterilization. In this manner, each reusable device undergoes the most effective and least costly processing approach available.

Mini Clini

Selection of Equipment Processing Methods

Discussion

First, the circuit, humidifier, and resuscitation bag should be disassembled and cleaned, using a soap or detergent combined with a low-level or intermediate-level disinfectant. Because the ventilator, respirometer, and laryngoscope and blades cannot be immersed in water, they should immediately undergo surface disinfection, using 70% ethyl alcohol or the equivalent.

After cleaning and initial disinfection, you should sort the items according to risk category and heat sensitivity. No items from this patient are a critical infection risk. The ventilator circuit, humidifier, resuscitation bag, respirometer, and laryngoscope are semicritical items, whereas the ventilator itself is a noncritical item. The ventilator circuit, humidifier, and resuscitation bag are also plastic and probably heat labile. The respirometer and laryngoscope are heat stable.

When possible, semicritical items should be sterilized between patients; the heat-stable items should be autoclaved, and heat-labile items should undergo EtO sterilization. The ventilator (a noncritical item) need undergo only low-level to intermediate-level surface disinfection. The inner parts of the ventilator need not be sterilized or disinfected between patients.

HAIs associated with bronchoscopes have been most commonly reported with M. tuberculosis, nontuberculosis mycobacteria, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.22 The most common reasons for transmission include failure to adhere to recommended cleaning and disinfection procedures, failure of automated endoscope reprocessors, and flaws in design. Flexible endoscopes are particularly difficult to disinfect, and meticulous cleaning must precede any sterilization or high-level disinfection process.

Disposable Equipment

An important alternative to reprocessing equipment continually is the use of single-patient-use disposable devices. In the past, only oxygen therapy devices (i.e., masks, cannulas), suction apparatus (i.e., catheters, tubing), and some supplies were disposable. Today, manufacturers provide a whole range of disposable devices, including humidifiers, nebulizers, incentive spirometers, ventilator circuits, bag-valve-masks, and monitoring transducers.

Three major issues are involved in using disposable devices: cost, quality, and reuse. Cost issues boil down to straightforward dollar comparisons between purchasing and processing reusable devices versus stocking and distributing disposable devices. Good comparisons take into account direct and indirect costs (e.g., personnel, inventory, maintenance) and risk factors. Most recent findings support the cost-effectiveness of disposable devices over reusable devices in respiratory care.

Cost savings notwithstanding, many quality issues persist. Although disposable devices generally perform well, poor quality control remains a problem.23 Respiratory care managers need to evaluate carefully disposable devices being considered for bulk purchase before actual clinical use.24 To ensure reliability, this evaluation should include physical testing of multiple units of each model being assessed. Finally, bedside clinicians need to inspect carefully and confirm the operation of any disposable device before use.

Reusing high-cost, high-volume disposable equipment saves hospitals money. The practice of reusing devices labeled by the manufacturer for “single-use only” raises significant safety concerns and issues of negligence.25 The CDC recommends that single-use devices be considered for reuse only if there is good evidence that reprocessing poses no threat to the patient and does not alter the function of the device.4 Individuals responsible for reusing disposable equipment bear a significant burden of proof. Without such proof, users of reprocessed single-use devices may be transferring legal liability for the safe performance of the product from the manufacturer to themselves or their employer.26

Fluids and Medications Precautions

Unit dosing has decreased but has not eliminated the infection hazard associated with medications. Box 4-13 outlines several simple procedures designed to help prevent cross contamination while using fluids and medications.

Handling Contaminated Articles and Equipment

Contaminated items, whether reusable or disposable, should be enclosed in an impervious bag before removal from a patient’s room. Bagging helps prevent accidental exposure of both personnel and the environment to contaminated articles. A single bag is satisfactory if (1) the bag is strong and impervious, and (2) the contaminated items can be bagged without contaminating the outer surface of the bag. Otherwise, the contaminated items should be double-bagged. Bags used for contaminated articles or waste materials should be clearly labeled or color-coded for this purpose.

After bagging, reusable patient care equipment must be returned to the applicable processing area. Contaminated reusable equipment should remain bagged until ready for decontamination or sterilization. When contaminated waste is being discarded, both OSHA procedures and any applicable local, state, or federal regulations must be followed.

Surveillance for Hospital-Acquired Infections

Surveillance is an ongoing process of monitoring patients and health care personnel for acquisition of infection or colonization of pathogens, or both. It is one of the five key recommended components of an infection prevention program; the others are investigation, prevention, control, and reporting.2 Surveillance is a tool to provide HAI data on patients to provide outcome measurements either to ensure that there is no ongoing problem or to detect problems and intervene to prevent transmission of pathogens in the health care environment.

Generally, an infection prevention committee establishes surveillance policies, and an infection control nurse or epidemiologist administers them. The surveillance program may be centralized or decentralized (to the various service departments). The following principles should be a part of any infection prevention surveillance program2: (1) use of standard definitions for HAIs, (2) use of microbiology-based data (when available) including resistance patterns for pathogens of significance (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus), (3) establishment of risk stratification for infection risk when available (e.g., ventilator days, device days), (4) monitoring of results prospectively and identifying trends that indicate unusual rates of infection or transmission within the facility, and (5) provision of feedback to stakeholders within the institution (e.g., surgical site infection rates reported back to individual surgeons). It is also common for infection prevention programs to oversee hand hygiene and standard precautions adherence observations. Increasingly, data on adherence to infection prevention processes such as the VAP bundle and patient and health care influenza vaccination rates are available.

The hospital microbiology laboratory fulfills a central role in surveillance for HAIs and community-acquired pathogens (e.g., influenza) that is important for the infection control practitioner. In addition, the increased incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms makes it essential that clinicians have up-to-date information on the resistance patterns of pathogens they are treating in the hospital.

Microbiology personnel work closely with infection control professionals in support of the surveillance program; regular diagnostic activities often reveal patterns of infection with certain microorganisms that can precede widespread outbreaks. The combination of diagnostic activities with ongoing surveillance can help prevent or minimize large-scale in-hospital epidemics.

The surveillance activities of an infection control program are most effective when they generate actionable data that are communicated to the bedside caregiver in a timely fashion. These data can become the springboard for continuous improvement in the delivery of care. Infection control practitioners communicate the results of surveillance activities to bedside caregivers in a meaningful way so that continuous improvements in care occur based on local data. All health care workers should be aware of the rates of adherence in their area to bundles, hand hygiene, and HAI and should seek out their infection control practitioner with any questions, observations, and suggestions on how care could be improved.

Summary Checklist

• The five major routes for transmission of pathogens are contact, droplet, airborne, common vehicle, and vector-borne.

• Infection control procedures involve (1) eliminating the sources of infectious agents, (2) creating barriers to their transmission, and (3) monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of control.

• Failure to clean equipment properly can render all subsequent processing efforts ineffective.

• Physical or chemical disinfection destroys the vegetative form of pathogenic organisms but cannot kill bacterial spores.

• Glutaraldehyde (20 minutes) is the most common option for high-level disinfection of semicritical respiratory care equipment.

• EtO is best suited for sterilization of critical moisture-sensitive or heat-sensitive items; heat-stable critical items should be autoclaved (steam-sterilized).

• Among respiratory care equipment, large volume nebulizers have the greatest potential to spread infection.

• Ventilator circuits should be changed when visibly soiled or malfunctioning.

• HMEs may be used up to 96 hours before they need to be changed.

• Single-use items should be reused only if there is hard documented evidence that reprocessing poses no threat to the patient and does not alter the function of the device.

• Sterile fluids must always be used for tracheal suctioning and for filling nebulizers and humidifiers.

• Hands need to be thoroughly washed after any patient contact, even when gloves are used.

• Standard precautions must be used in caring for all patients, regardless of their diagnosis or infection status.

• The use of gloves is part of routine basic care when there is skin contact with a patient.

• Masks, goggles, or a face shield must be worn during any procedure that can generate splashes or sprays of blood, body fluids, secretions, or excretions.

• RTs must be familiar with the overall infection control program of OSHA, including surveillance policies and procedures.