Parkinson Disease

Published on 03/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 7721 times

33 Parkinson Disease

Clinical Vignette

This 54-year-old lady, a very dedicated high school art teacher, jammed her finger while playing basketball. Although the discomfort cleared rapidly, she continued to “favor” that hand. Her husband soon noted that her arm swing was absent on that side, telling her she carried the arm flexed “like Napoleon.” Soon she lost the normal range of motion of that limb; eventually this arm became stiff, and she had increasingly limited motion at the shoulder. This led to her seeking chiropractic help; here she received manipulation, acupuncture, and heat. About 2 years after onset, she began to drag her right foot while walking. Subsequently, her art work became more limited, taking increasingly more time to do simple things such as coloring a boat. Her handwriting became more difficult as her hand began to shake and the figures increasingly small the longer she tried to write.

Neurologic examination demonstrated moderate masking of her face, a positive Myerson’s sign, a mild 6-Hz rest tremor of her right hand, cogwheel rigidity of that wrist and elbow, diminished right arm swing, and a mild tendency to petit-pas gait. Extraocular muscle function was full, with no limitation of vertical gaze. Although a diagnosis of Parkinson disease (PD) was made here, initially she did not agree to take medication. Her tremor became much more pronounced at rest, particularly noticeable to her students. Activities of daily living were increasingly limited, such as getting dressed, going up and down stairs, and getting out of chairs. She had no problems with her left extremities.

Head computed tomographic (CT) scan was normal. No other investigations were indicated, as the diagnosis of PD is primarily a clinical one. Because of her moderately significant functional impairment, levodopa/carbidopa was initiated. Within 4 weeks, she demonstrated marked improvement. She was able to move faster, and her fine motor activities and tremor were significantly improved. This allowed her to return to a more vigorous approach to her celebrated teaching style. This excellent response made it most likely that idiopathic PD was the diagnosis.

In 1817, James Parkinson made the seminal observations on this disorder defining a specific neurodegenerative illness characterized by bradykinesia, resting tremor, cogwheel rigidity, and postural reflex impairment. Parkinson disease (PD) has a relatively stereotyped clinical presentation that now bears the name of this early 19th-century physician. PD is one of the most common neurologic disorders worldwide. It affects at least 1,500,000 persons within the United States. Its incidence typically peaks in the sixth decade; however, one can see classic clinical cases with onset as early as the fourth decade. On occasion, medication-induced Parkinson disease may also occur in early middle-aged individuals. In contrast, PD sometimes presents well into the late eighth or even the ninth decade. Usually the patient’s clinical status progresses from a relatively modest limitation at diagnosis to an ever-increasing disability over 10 to 20 years in many but not all patients. The primary neuropathologic features are loss of pigmented dopaminergic neurons mainly in the substantia nigra (SN) and the presence of Lewy bodies—eosinophilic, cytoplasmic inclusions found within the pigmented neurons (Fig. 33-1). These neurons’ primary projection is to the striatum, for example, the putamen and caudate. Dopamine is released primarily from these striatal cells. From here dopamine neurotransmission sequentially is directed through the globus pallidus, the subthalamic nucleus, to the thalamus per se, and then to the primary motor cortex (Figs. 33-2 and 33-3).

Etiology

Despite intensive research, the precise etiology of PD remains elusive. One conceptualization is that an unknown environmental toxin acts on genetically susceptible individuals to cause PD. The principal link between PD and an environmental toxin is the chemical MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine). This chemical was initially used by drug abusers in hopes of mimicking in the laboratory a synthetic narcotic-like substance. When ingested by humans, this narcotic model serendipitously led to a clinical entity that directly mimicked PD. As MPTP interferes with the function of nerve cell mitochondria, investigators next conjectured that chemicals impairing mitochondrial DNA may be one major pathophysiologic mechanism underlying human PD. It is here that evidence exists for a disturbance in oxidative phosphorylation, particularly reduced activity of complex I of the mitochondrial electron transport chain. Additionally, there are increased levels of free iron that may enhance toxic free radical formation.

Fifteen percent of Parkinson patients have a family history of PD; a small percentage of these individuals have at least three affected generations. It is unknown whether the clinical picture results from a defective gene per se, a shared environmental insult, or both. Currently there are several causative genes identified that are specific to young-onset PD. Although these well-identified PD genes are pathogenic in only a very small minority of individuals, their biochemical signatures are providing extraordinary insight into the molecular pathology of this disease. The currently identified genes are listed in Table 33-1.

Genes for Parkinson Disease

Pathology/Pathophysiology

The pathologic sites responsible for the parkinsonian disorders reside in a group of brain gray matter structures known as the extrapyramidal system or basal ganglia (Fig. 33-2). These include striatum (caudate nucleus and putamen), globus pallidus interna and externa, subthalamic nucleus, substantia nigra pars reticulate and pars compacta, and the ventral nuclei of the thalamus.

Degeneration of the substantia nigra (SN) pars compacta is the pathologic hallmark of PD (Figs. 33-2 and 33-4). Neurons within the SN per se synthesize the neurotransmitter dopamine. These cells contain a dark pigment called neuromelanin. Parkinson symptoms develop when approximately 60% of these cells die. Concomitantly, direct inspection of the SN in PD demonstrates an abnormal pallor when compared with that characteristically seen with the normal hyperpigmented melanin-containing cells.

Direct dopaminergic projections from the SN influence motor processing within the basal ganglia by facilitating movement execution and concomitantly helping to suppress certain unwanted motor activity. When intra-SN dopaminergic neuron cell death occurs within the SN, the number of specific dopamine nerve terminals in the striatum decreases. These findings are associated with the classic PD clinical findings of rigidity and akinesia. In addition, basal ganglia function appears to extend beyond simple motor control concepts. The cortico-striato-pallido-thalamo-cortical circuit comprises several distinct and segregated loops, each having a different motor agonistic function. Within each loop are parallel pathways having antagonistic effects on this circuit outflow. The loss of dopamine provokes a less active direct pathway and a more active indirect pathway. Disinhibition of the major output nuclei and increased inhibition of the thalamocortical system result in the classic pill rolling tremor.

The direct pathway arises from neurons that connect the striatum with the output nuclei, including the globus pallidum internum (Gpi) and substantia nigra pars reticularis (SNr). Direct pathway neurons contain GABA, the inhibitory neurotransmitter, and substance P (a neuropeptide that functions both as a neurotransmitter and neuromodulator), and express the excitatory D1 dopamine receptor. Direct pathway neurons receive glutamatergic projections from the cortex to the striatum. They also send GABAergic projections from SNr/Gpi to the ventral anterior and ventral lateral thalamic nuclei, completing the loop by sending glutamatergic fibers back to the cortex. The direct striatopallidal influence inhibits the Gpi neurons. These neurons inhibit the thalamic outflow to the cortex. The net effect of direct pathway activity is excitatory by stimulating cortical activity.

The indirect pathway includes intermediate synapses within the globus pallidum externum (Gpe) and subthalamic nucleus (STN). Neurons within this pathway contain enkephalins and express the inhibitory D2 dopamine receptor. This pathway consists of three glutamatergic and three GABAergic-type neurons. Glutamatergic neurons in the cortex project to the striatum; striatal GABAergic neurons project to the Gpe. From Gpe, a second set of GABAergic neurons projects to a second set of glutamatergic neurons in the STN that project to the Gpi/SNr. The neurons from Gpi/SNr send GABAergic neurons to the thalamus. The final thalamocortical projection is glutamatergic. By contrast, increased indirect pathway activity excites the Gpi neurons, ultimately inhibiting cortical activity.

Decreased dopaminergic neurons in PD affects the direct pathway by reducing activity at Gpi and SNr leading to increased inhibitory output of Gpi and SNr. In the indirect pathway, dopamine deficiency in PD disinhibits striatopallidal neurons synapsing in Gpe, reducing activity in the inhibitory pallidosubthalamic neurons. Dopamine loss increases the striatal activity via the projections to GABAergic neurons that increase actions on the Gpe. Furthermore, dopamine loss causes a disinhibition of the STN through the indirect pathway.

Clinical Presentation

The four primary signs of PD are bradykinesia, tremor, rigidity, and gait disturbance (Fig. 33-5). The primary criteria for a diagnosis of PD require that the patient’s neurologic examination demonstrate at least two of these four features. There are certain additional features very suggestive of idiopathic PD. These include an asymmetric or unilateral onset and a clear response to levodopa treatment. Importantly from the point of differential diagnosis, neither of these features occurs in some of the atypical parkinsonism syndromes.

Bradykinesia, the most disabling PD symptom, is a decreased ability to initiate movement (akinesia is the extreme manifestation). This may affect multiple functions, particularly fine motor tasks such as buttoning a shirt or handwriting, the latter becoming micrographic. Other individuals may present with a masked facies nonemotional, bland, and expressionless, which later on becomes associated with decreased blink frequency, muted speech, and slowed swallowing. Typically, the gait is shuffling with decreased arm swing, stooped posture, and en bloc turning, The Myerson’s sign, or glabellar tap sign, is elicited by having the patient look straight ahead while the examiner gently taps with her or his index finger tip between the medial ends of the eyebrows. Normally the patient blinks for the first few taps and then such is inhibited. In contrast, the PD patient persistently blinks as long as the tapping is maintained and thus a positive test.

Rigidity is a resistance to passive movement throughout the entire range of motion occurring in flexor and extensor muscles. This contrasts with spasticity, wherein there is an initial marked resistance to passive movement and then a sudden release, for example, clasp-knife phenomena. The classic cogwheel quality (stop-and-go effect) is from a tremor superimposed on the altered muscle tone. Very early on, patients are often concerned about stiffness, “weakness,” or fatigue. Initially, the patient will just note a limitation in their daily activities or exercise capacity—unable to hike as long a distance, inability to get to the ball when playing tennis, or simply walking from the car to the store. When more pronounced, these bradykinetic symptoms may represent the combination of bradykinesia with rigidity.

Tremor occurs in 75% of patients. Typically, it is prominent at rest, having a frequency of 3–7 Hz. Although this tremor usually does not significantly interfere with activities of daily living (ADLs), such as eating or writing, the patient finds it very embarrassing. PD patients frequently sit in the physician’s office placing the affected hand out of sight down by their side or underneath a jacket. Sometimes they will actually hold the tremulous hand with the unaffected opposite hand. One should look for the tremor to be “uncovered” when asking the patient to walk; not only is the arm swing lost but a minor pill rolling tremor may become amplified as the hand comes away from the body and the patient is no longer able to cover it. Occasionally a PD tremor has a significant postural or action component complicating distinction from the more benign essential tremor.

Gait disturbance, postural instability, or both usually present at later stages of PD characterized by a change in the center of gravity typified by falling forward (propulsion) or backward (retropulsion) and a festinating (shuffling, slowly propulsive) petit pas (small steps) gait. When these symptoms are found early in PD, evaluation for other causes of parkinsonism, including progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and multiple system atrophy (MSA), is required.

Typically PD progresses in stages (Fig. 33-5). There are two commonly utilized rating scales to measure the degree of disability that these patients manifest: (1) UPDRS (Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale) and (2) Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scale (Box 33-1).

Two other less common symptoms, namely, seborrheic dermatitis and hyposmia (diminished sense of smell), although not diagnostic per se, may prove to be diagnostically helpful early on in the course of PD. This is especially true when these symptoms are seen in association with one primary PD criteria such as decreased arm swing. The recognition of either the seborrhea or a limited sense of smell may lead the astute clinician to an appropriate PD diagnosis even early in the disease course. Later in its course, certain secondary features often occur. Patients may experience difficulties with sleep initiation and maintenance. This sleep disturbance can occur secondary to the presence of an early morning dystonia or tremor, restless leg syndrome, or rapid eye movement (REM) behavior disorder. About 30% of PD patients also experience periodic leg movement of sleep.

Autonomic dysfunction is seen commonly in PD. It is manifested as orthostatic hypotension, impaired gastrointestinal motility, urinary bladder dysfunction, disorders in thermoregulation, and sexual dysfunction.

Dysphagia is usually present later on in the PD patient. This relates to the development of oropharyngeal and esophageal motility disorders.

Psychiatric and cognitive symptomatology also frequently accompany or even precede the diagnosis of PD in some patients: about 40% suffer a major depression that may precede the diagnosis of the movement disorder; anxiety also occurs in up to 40% of patients. Later on in PD, hallucinations (visual, most likely nonthreatening), psychosis, and vivid nocturnal dreams are common. Cognitive dysfunction is typically a later manifestation. Clinically, it has the characteristics of a subcortical dementia (Chapter 18).

The clinical course or temporal profile of PD is quite variable. However, it usually progresses slowly and inexorably (Fig. 33-5). Typically, the illness begins unilaterally with focal tremor or difficulty using one limb. Eventually, the symptoms become more generalized and occur on the contralateral side, interfering with activities of daily living. Several secondary signs of parkinsonism also develop as previously noted.

Early on, the neurologic clinician must maintain a level of alertness for the presence of certain other clinical characteristics that serve as “red flags” suggesting other non-Parkinson movement disorders. These are known as the “Parkinson plus” syndromes, including progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), and multiple-system atrophy (MSA) (see Box 33-3).

If possible, it is useful to exclude these early in the disease course as they may change the treatment and prognosis. These are considered in detail in Chapter 34.

Differential Diagnoses

When Parkinson-like findings are found in the face of other identifiable neurologic disorders, a primary diagnosis of PD should not be entertained. These include stroke, head injury, neuroleptic exposure, hydrocephalus, encephalitis, or brain tumor. The vast majority of PD patients present with at least two of the following classic findings, namely, bradykinesia; rigidity; tremor; and a petit pas, festinating gait disorder. When one only sees a single example of these physical changes, the patient may have early PD especially if associated with either seborrhea or anosmia. A certain set of clinical findings, such as the presence of supranuclear gaze palsy, must make one immediately consider other nontreatable movement disorders that are easily confused early on in these illnesses with PD (Box 33-2). Otherwise, there is a relatively limited set of conditions to consider in the evaluation of such individuals (Box 33-3). These include essential tremor, secondary, atypical and familial parkinsonism, and other rare causes of parkinsonism.

Secondary Causes of Parkinsonism

Medications

Dopamine receptor-blocking agents used in psychiatry and for gastrointestinal symptoms are the most common drugs causing parkinsonism (Table 33-2). In the hospital, one may see patients who have newly developed parkinsonism after a relatively short course of symptomatic gastrointestinal medications such as metoclopramide. Of patients taking neuroleptic agents on a long-term basis, ~15% develop parkinsonism. Recovery following withdrawal of the offending agent may take weeks to months. If antiparkinsonian medication is required in these patients, anticholinergics are the drugs of choice.

Table 33-2 Medications Causing Secondary Parkinsonism

Generic Trade Name
Acetophenazine Tindal
Amoxapine Asendin
Chlorpromazine Thorazine
Fluphenazine Permitil, Prolixin
Haloperidol Haldol
Loxapine Loxitane, Daxolin
Mesoridazine Serentil
Metoclopramide Reglan
Molindone Lidone, Moban
Perphenazine Trilafon or Triavil
Piperacetazine Quide
Prochlorperazine Compazine, Combid
Promazine Sparine
Promethazine Phenergan
Thiethylperazine Torecan
Thioridazine Mellaril
Thiothixene Navane
Trifluoperazine Stelazine
Triflupromazine Vesprin
Trimeprazine Temaril

Infectious Diseases

It is very rare for one to need consider a secondary infectious mechanism to be responsible for a patient with parkinsonism. AIDS, cryptococcal meningoencephalitis, cysticercosis, fungal abscesses in the striata, herpes simplex encephalitis, Japanese B encephalitis, malaria, mycoplasma infection, postvaccinal parkinsonism, prion diseases (Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease), St. Louis encephalitis, subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, syphilis, tuberculosis, and Whipple disease may each lead to an encephalitis that presents with significant striatal involvement. Tremor rarely occurs in these syndromes. However, the infectious symptoms predominate, and the central nervous system involvement often demonstrates signs of a more widespread pathologic process affecting other neurologic systems.

Postencephalitic parkinsonism (PeP), also known as von Economo disease, encephalitis lethargica, or sleeping sickness, occurred in a pandemic in Europe and North America from 1916 to 1927. The precise infectious agent is still not identified. Typically, parkinsonism symptoms occurred immediately after the acute infectious process; however, in some patients prominent symptoms were not evident for up to 20 years. Clinically, patients had parkinsonism with other distinctive features: behavioral and mental disturbances in the acute illness, changes in sleep patterns, and ocular motor dysfunction, particularly oculogyric crisis (i.e., spasms of conjugate eye muscles, deviating eyes upward, downward, or to one side for minutes or hours). Levodopa was not as well tolerated as in idiopathic PD; high doses of anticholinergic medications were better tolerated. Today PeP is primarily a disorder of historic interest.

Normal-pressure hydrocephalus

This must also be considered in the PD differential diagnosis. Normal-pressure hydrocephalus also typically presents with a gait disorder; however, it is somewhat different than that of idiopathic PD (see Chapter 32, Fig. 32-2). Typically slowness of gait is the initial symptom; characteristically this is a “magnetic” mildly wide-based finding likened to walking in cement. Cognitive decline may appear earlier in this syndrome than in PD, and “unwitting incontinence” may follow. It is important to recognize this relatively uncommon disorder early on as it is eminently treatable.

SCA indicates spinocerebellar atrophy.

Atypical Parkinsonism

Atypical parkinsonian syndromes or “Parkinson plus syndrome” (Chapter 34) are chronic, progressive neurodegenerative disorders, characterized by rapidly evolving parkinsonism in association with other signs of neurologic dysfunction not found within the spectrum of idiopathic Parkinson disease (PD) (Box 33-2). The presence of atypical signs on examination, sometimes called “red flags” (supranuclear gaze palsy, corticospinal pathway involvement, cerebellar signs, early autonomic dysfunction or dementia) with rapidly progressive course and minimal response to dopaminergic medications should trigger the clinician to look for atypical parkinsonism such as PSP, CBD, MSA or DLBD.

Familial Parkinsonism

A well-defined genetic component is present in a minority of PD patients even though most individuals developing classical parkinsonism have no specific etiology identified. Mutations in five causative genes (Table 33-1) together account for 2–3% of all patients with classical parkinsonism. These include alpha-synuclein (SNCA), parkin, PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1), DJ-1, and leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2). These patients are often clinically indistinguishable from others with idiopathic PD. Although the individual clinical course cannot be predicted, overall, many cases of genetic PD will progress more slowly and respond better to treatment than patients without mutations. Genetic testing frequently yields inconclusive results, is expensive, and does not have a current indication in the vast majority of PD patients. DNA testing is rarely indicated in suspected PD patients. It may be occasionally useful for diagnostic purposes but only after careful consideration in selected cases at specialty centers.

Diagnostic Evaluation

Key diagnostic elements are the presence of two of the four cardinal signs: bradykinesia, tremor, rigidity, and gait problems (Fig. 33-5). However, it is unusual for a patient to present initially with the full-blown disease, and characteristic signs may not be present. Frequently, the patient may first become aware of a nonspecific fatigue in previously well-performed activities of daily living primarily affecting motor function. They may note a diminished reserve for distance demands. Clinical reexamination in several-month intervals is often needed to confirm a diagnosis of PD. Signs of another degenerative process sometimes become evident, interdicting the earlier diagnostic suspicion.

Although approaches to a specific preclinical detection of PD are constantly being investigated, a practical, inexpensive, sensitive, screening test is not available. Use of CT and MRI sometimes helps to distinguish idiopathic PD from other forms of parkinsonism. This is particularly relevant when the clinical findings are purely unilateral. Imaging studies may show atherosclerotic brain disease or normal-pressure hydrocephalus and rarely demonstrate a structural lesion. MRI sometimes shows signs typical for multiple-system atrophy (putaminal atrophy, hot cross bun sign, a hyperintense putaminal rim, and infratentorial signal changes).

One of the most specific diagnostic tools available today is a positive clinical response to a therapeutic trial of Parkinson medications. This is especially relevant with levodopa, particularly in the patient with unilateral symptoms, including bradykinesia, rigidity, and petit pas gait.

Once a specific PD diagnosis is confirmed, it is useful to qualitatively measure (Box 33-1) the disease severity. This allows the treating physician to establish a pretreatment clinical baseline. This will serve as a reference for future comparisons.

Treatment

PD treatment remains symptomatic; there is no neuroprotective therapy available to prevent ongoing evolution of this neurodegenerative disorder. Patient management requires careful consideration of the patient’s symptoms and signs, stage of disease, degree of functional disability, and levels of activity and daily productivity. Treatment can be divided into (1) nonpharmacologic, (2) pharmacologic, and (3) surgical. Most patients with idiopathic PD have a significant therapeutic response to levodopa. The complete absence of a clinical response to a dose of 25/100 mg of carbidopa/levodopa 6–10 times a day strongly suggests that the original diagnosis was incorrect and should prompt a search for other causes of parkinsonism.

Pharmacologic therapy for PD consists of five types of medication (Box 33-4). There is no simple approach to treating PD; guidelines depend on functional impairment and response to therapy.

The treatment of PD can be divided into therapy of early and later stages (with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia). For patients requiring initiation of symptomatic therapy, there are three primary options: levodopa, dopaminergic agonists, or MAO-B inhibitors (level A, class I and class II evidence). Levodopa (LD) provides superior motor benefit but is associated with a higher risk of dyskinesia and motor complications. Dopaminergic agonists (DAs) result in fewer motor complications (wearing off, dyskinesia, on–off motor fluctuations) than levodopa treatment after 2.5 years of follow-up. However primary DA therapy is associated with more frequent adverse events, including hallucinations, somnolence, and edema, than levodopa therapy. The choice of either LD or DA, when initiating therapy, depends on the relative impact of improving motor disability (better with levodopa) compared with the lessening of motor complications (better with dopamine agonists) for each individual patient with PD (level A, class I and II evidence). For patients with PD in whom carbidopa/levodopa treatment is being instituted, either an immediate-release or sustained-release preparation may be considered (level B, class II evidence).

An important principle for early treatment of PD is that the introduction and use of medication must be tailored to the patient’s individual needs. An arbitrary age of 70 years has been used as a guide to develop strategies for treatment initiation, although there must always be an emphasis on each individual patient’s characteristics. As a general rule, for patients younger than age 70 years and having no cognitive dysfunction, the choice of initial drug may lie between MAO-B inhibitor and a dopamine agonist. Carbidopa/levodopa is started in Parkinson patients aged 70 years and older who have a significant motor disability, such as bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, or gait problems. Senior citizens with PD may also be considered for MAO-B inhibitor or DA if they are cognitively intact and lack any significant comorbidity.

As PD progresses, the provision of effective symptom control becomes more challenging, and additional drugs may need to be added. For later stages of the disease, American Academy of Neurology guidelines suggest starting Entacapone, a COMT inhibitor, and rasagiline, an MAO inhibitor, as first choice to reduce off time (level A). DAs (pramipexole, ropinirole) and tolcapone should be considered to reduce off time as a second choice (level B). Tolcapone (hepatotoxicity) and pergolide (valvular fibrosis) should be used with caution and require monitoring. Apomorphine, cabergoline, and selegiline may be considered to reduce off time as third choice (level C). Amantadine may be considered to reduce dyskinesia (level C). DBS STN may be considered to improve motor fluctuation and reduce off time, dyskinesia and medication usage (level C). Sustained release carbidopa/levodopa and bromocriptine may be disregarded to reduce off time (level C).

Dopaminergic

Levodopa

Levodopa (LD) with carbidopa is the most commonly used, most potent antiparkinsonian medication and is equally beneficial for all symptoms. Levodopa is the immediate natural precursor of dopamine and is converted to dopamine by the enzyme aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AAAD) (Fig. 33-6). Initially, levodopa was associated with a high rate of side effects, particularly nausea and vomiting, because of its ability to stimulate peripheral, non–central nervous system dopamine receptors. The addition of the decarboxylase inhibitor carbidopa decreased the incidence of the peripheral side effect, permitted more levodopa to cross the blood–brain barrier, and consequently allowed a reduction of the total levodopa dose. Carbidopa-levodopa is available in immediate-release form as tablets (Sinemet) or sublingual pills (Parcopa) and controlled-release formulations (Sinemet CR).

Early side effects, including nausea and orthostatic hypotension, are more easily managed than the late motor complications. Late side effects include involuntary movements, motor fluctuations, vivid dreams and nightmares, confusion, and psychosis, typically hallucinations and delusions, mania, or paranoia. In the geriatric population, particularly those individuals beginning to demonstrate early cognitive limitations, these levodopa side effects are more likely to occur. Treatment of these side effects also presents significant challenges as at times the commonly utilized antipsychotic drugs may worsen the parkinsonism per se.

With increasing duration of usage, there is a slower or delayed response to levodopa’s therapeutic effect. LD also appears to have a shorter duration of action, a “wearing off” between doses. The patient’s classic PD symptoms that had so nicely disappeared early in the course of treatment become prominent once again. Painful muscle spasms occur in some patients.

Two of the most disabling long-term LD therapeutic side effects are the appearance of a variety of dyskinesias and motor fluctuations developing in a modest number of PD individuals. These involuntary movements are often choreiform; they can be particularly disabling, affecting various body parts; at times these rather bizarre postures may also be emotionally painful. The treatment of these complications is most difficult. Amantadine and the DAs are sometimes helpful adjuncts.

Dopaminergic Agonists

DAs directly stimulate dopaminergic receptors. They are particularly indicated for monotherapy in younger patients, who are more prone to the early development of levodopa-related clinical fluctuations and who require long-term treatment. At least two general classes of dopamine agonists exist: one coupled to adenylate cyclases (D1) and the other not so linked (D2). Most effective antiparkinsonian dopamine agonists stimulate predominantly D2 receptors.

DAs are used mainly early in the illness because they reduce the need for levodopa. Although not as effective as levodopa, DAs often provide satisfactory relief of mild symptoms. In those instances when severe symptoms interfere with the patient’s social or occupational activities, early symptomatic treatment with carbidopa-levodopa, later combined with a DA, may be necessary. Commonly utilized preparations include pramipexole, ropinirole, bromocriptine, and pergolide (Box 33-5). Pergolide had been recently taken off the market because of potential heart valvular damage. Impulse control disorders or dysfunctional behaviors are problems that have been increasingly recognized with dopaminergic agonists but that occur much less commonly with levodopa. These disorders include hypersexuality, compulsive gambling, meaningless and repetitive activities (punding), hypomanic states, and addictive overuse of levodopa.

Future Directions

Because PD is more common with increasing age, its prevalence is expected to triple over the next 50 years because of the increased number of aging individuals in the westernized population. The most promising research is focused on the function and anatomy of the motor system, ways of controlling neurodegeneration, location of possible environmental factors, identification of a gene causing PD, and new medical and surgical therapies.

Animal models are used for studying methods for delivering dopamine to critical brain areas by implanting tiny dopamine-containing particles into brain regions affected by the disease. Such implants could partially ameliorate the movement problems exhibited by these animals. Also under investigation are implantable pumps that can produce a continuous supply of levodopa and help prevent fluctuations. Another promising method involves implanting capsules containing dopamine-producing cells into the brain. Neural grafting, or transplantation of nerve cells, is a proposed technique. Animal models show that damaged nerve cells can regenerate after fetal brain tissue from the SN is implanted. Other therapeutic attempts are directed to replace the lost dopamine-producing neurons with healthy, fetal neurons, and thereby improve movement and response to medications. A promising approach is the use of genetically engineered cells (e.g., modified skin cells grown in tissue culture) that could have the same beneficial effects. Skin cells would be much easier to harvest, and patients could serve as their own donors.

Additional Resources

Bonuccelli U, Ceravolo R. The safety of dopamine agonists in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2008 Mar;7(2):111-127.

Ho BL, Lieu AS, Hsu CY. Hemiparkinsonism secondary to an infiltrative astrocytoma. Neurologist. 2008 Jul;14(4):258-261.

LeWitt PA. Levodopa for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2468-2476. An excellent overall discussion of the current status of first-line medical therapy

McGoon DC. The Parkinson’s Handbook. New York: WW Norton; 1990. (An inspiring personal account of how a world-famed cardiothoracic surgeon discovered and dealt with his own PD that began during the height of his career. A very insightful commentary of value to both treating physician and patient alike.)

Shapira AHV. Treatment options in the modern management of Parkinson’s disease. Archives of Neurology. Aug 2007;64(8):1083-1087.

The following Practice Parameter Guidelines from the American Academy of Neurology published in Neurology provide state-of-the-art reviews:

April 2006, Movement Disorders, Diagnosis and Prognosis of New Onset Parkinson Disease, Wendy Edlund at wedlund@aan.com. Endorsed by the National Parkinson Foundation and the Parkinson’s Disease Foundation. Abstract Objective: To define key issues in the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease (PD), to define features influencing progression

April 2006, Movement Disorders, Initiation of Treatment for Parkinson’s Disease. Practice Parameter: Initiation of Treatment for Parkinson’s Disease (An Evidence-Based Review) Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. J. M. Miyasaki, MD, W. Martin, MD, O. Suchowersky, MD, W. J. Weiner, MD.

April 2006, Movement Disorders, Evaluation Treatment of Depression, Psychosis and Dementia in Parkinson Disease, Endorsed by the National Parkinson Foundation and the Parkinson’s Disease Foundation. Abstract Objective: To make evidence-based treatment recommendations for patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) with dementia, depression, and psychosis

April 2006, Movement Disorders, Treatment of Parkinson Disease with Motor Fluctuations and Dyskinesia.

Baltim A, Clinical Practice Parkinson Foundation and the Parkinson’s Disease Foundation. Abstract Objective: evidence-based treatment recommendations for the medical and surgical treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Methods: committee including movement.