Neurovascular Imaging

Published on 13/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurosurgery

Last modified 13/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1397 times

CHAPTER 348 Neurovascular Imaging

Moniz performed the first cerebral angiogram in 1927.1,2 Since that time, neurovascular imaging has undergone rapid evolution. The introduction of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offered viable noninvasive means of imaging the neurovascular tree. More recently, improvements in technology and technique have enabled the acquisition of direct and indirect hemodynamic measurements and functional and physiologic data, as well as visualization of intravascular pathology.

Modern noninvasive neurovascular imaging techniques can be broadly classified as being based on CT or MRI and include CT angiography (CTA), xenon-enhanced CT (Xe-CT), single-photon emission CT (SPECT), and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). In addition to a brief overview of the technique, this chapter discusses the indications, advantages, and disadvantages of each of the aforementioned modalities. How each neurovascular imaging technique can be used for specific clinical applications is also covered.

Computed Tomography–Based Techniques

Since the advent of CT in the 1970s, serial advances in imaging technique and computer software have provided increasingly detailed imaging of cerebrovascular anatomy, as well as the neurophysiologic properties of the brain in both the normal and pathologic states. For a comprehensive review of the available literature, please see the American Heart Association scientific statement on guidelines and recommendations for perfusion imaging in cerebral ischemia.3

Computed Tomographic Angiography

Clinical Applications

Cerebral Aneurysm

One of the most clinically useful applications of CTA is detection (Fig. 348-1A and B) and follow-up of cerebral aneurysms. Although digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has traditionally been the “gold standard” for detection of cerebral aneurysms, CTA has proved to have a sensitivity of greater than 90% for detection of aneurysms less than 2 mm in diameter.46 Because of the availability and speed of CTA, it has become the first-line imaging choice for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in many institutions. However, negative CTA findings necessitate subsequent DSA for evaluation of possible small aneurysms.

Because DSA is invasive and expensive, noninvasive modalities such as CTA are used to monitor aneurysms after treatment. CTA has been shown to be feasible for monitoring coiled aneurysms,6 but clipped aneurysms produce too much artifact to be well visualized on CTA, so specialized protocols have been developed to optimize the visualization of clipped aneurysms with CTA. Brown and coauthors reported on a technique in which CTA is performed with the patient’s head tilted so that the axial plane through the aneurysm clip projects away from the remainder of the circle of Willis. In their hands, this technique, when combined with other artifact-reducing methods (i.e., thin collimation), provides improved resolution of previously clipped aneurysms and surrounding structures.7

CTA has also been found to have many uses for preoperative or pre-embolization planning. Thin cuts through the skull base may provide very good visualization of an aneurysm in relation to the bony anatomy of the skull base and surrounding tissue. CTA may also provide the best view of a thrombus within a large aneurysm that is not otherwise visualized by DSA and may influence surgical or endovascular treatment.

Chronic Ischemia/Carotid Stenosis

CTA is increasingly being used as a stand-alone diagnostic test to identify carotid stenosis (see Fig. 348-2). Because it is noninvasive, CTA is frequently preferred over DSA for outpatients or for those who cannot otherwise tolerate DSA.

Other

As software technology improves, CTA has increasingly been used to diagnosis other cerebral pathology such as arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and carotid or vertebral artery dissection. Frequently, DSA is still used as a subsequent diagnostic test in these situations.

CTA has many advantages. It can be performed rapidly, in most cases within 20 minutes. Newer postprocessing software can quickly and reliably provide reconstructions within 10 to 15 minutes. This may prove invaluable in situations in which speed is required, such as for acute ischemia when intra-arterial thrombolysis may prevent continued neurological deterioration and improve the long-term outcome.

In addition, CTA is relatively easy to use and interpret. Indeed, most community hospitals have found CTA to be a logistically feasible alternative when other tests such as DSA or MRI are not available. CTA does not require an interventional neuroradiologist and can be performed with the standard 16- or 64-slice scanners that are now available in many institutions throughout the world. The injection protocol is relatively simple to learn.

Another major advantage of CTA over DSA or MRA is that it provides excellent visualization of bony anatomy as it relates to vascular structures. For example, many rely on visualizing the optic strut on CTA to determine whether an ophthalmic aneurysm is intradural or extradural.8 CTA can also provide visualization of intraluminal thrombus.

Despite improvements, CTA does not always provide the same anatomic detail as either MRI or DSA. Information about flow rates or collateralization is not available on standard CTA sequences. As discussed later, CT perfusion can provide reliable relative cerebral blood flow (CBF) data.9

Computed Tomographic Perfusion

There have been attempts to use CT scans to provide functional and physiologic data since its advent in the 1970s. Only recently, however, have technologic advances allowed CT perfusion to be performed in timely fashion on standard helical scanners, which has consequently made it part of the stroke protocol at many institutions.1013

Clinical Applications

Acute Stroke

The key benefit in using CT perfusion is its ability to determine cerebral blood volume (CBV), CBF, MTT, and time to peak enhancement. These measurements are most useful for identification of the stroke “penumbra” of ischemic but not yet infarcted brain tissue that can potentially be saved by either intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolysis. Srinivasan and colleagues noted that “the clinical application of CT perfusion imaging in acute stroke is based on the hypothesis that the penumbra shows either (1) increased MTT with moderately decreased CBF (>60%) and normal or increased CBV (80% to 100% or higher) secondary to autoregulatory mechanisms or (2) increased MTT with markedly reduced CBF (>30%) and moderately reduced CBV (>60%), whereas infarcted tissue shows severely decreased CBF (<30%) and CBV (<40%) with increased MTT.”5 Complex deconvolution algorithms can then be used to produce color maps on which areas of a potential penumbra can quickly be identified. A large penumbra may prompt further attempts at clot lysis or retrieval, whereas a small or absent penumbra may be evidence that any new intervention will just incur new risks without any additional advantage in preserving brain tissue.

CT perfusion has been shown to be comparable to Xe-CT for evaluation of regional CBF.15 However, CT perfusion is faster and easier to use. Helical/spiral CT scanners are readily available in most institutions, and CT perfusion can usually be combined with CTA to provide data about the site of the obstructed vessel. Images can be acquired and easily conceptualized maps generated with enough speed to be of use in an acute stroke protocol.14,16

Early reports suggested that CTA with or without CT perfusion may offer a noninvasive way of evaluating vasospasm.17,18 A study of CTA alone had a sensitivity and specificity of 86.8% and 96.8%, respectively, for mild to moderate vasospasm and 76.5% and 99.5%, respectively, for severe vasospasm, whereas CT perfusion had a sensitivity and specificity of 20% and 100%, respectively, for mild to moderate vasospasm and 90% and 100%, respectively, for severe vasospasm.18 This and other studies suggest that in the near future, the combination of these two modalities may provide high sensitivity and specificity for the noninvasive evaluation of vasospasm.19

CT perfusion is quite promising, but its use is limited by the fact that it often requires significant expertise to process and interpret the images. In addition, the use of contrast agents may limit examinations in patients with impaired renal function or in those requiring multiple examinations. The radiation dose is very high, so this method cannot be justified for follow-up studies.

Xenon-Enhanced Computed Tomography

Xe-CT has been in use for more than 30 years20,21 and relies on application of the Kety-Schmidt equation to calculate CBF. Xenon is a small, biologically inert and inhalable molecule that serves as the “contrast agent.” Its easily crosses the blood-brain barrier and has a short half-life (40 seconds).16 Thus, it is an ideal tracer for the evaluation of cerebral perfusion. Xenon causes x-ray attenuation similar to iodine and hence can quickly be identified with CT-based technology. By measuring the xenon tissue concentration, both arterial input and tissue uptake can be determined.21

Clinical Applications

Acute Stroke

Many studies have demonstrated the accuracy of Xe-CT in determining CBF values, which can then be used to identify areas of reversible and irreversible ischemia.16,20,21,23 Flow values determined with Xe-CT have also been used to identify volumes of eventual infarction and areas at increased risk for hemorrhage and edema.

Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography

Clinical Applications

Ischemia

SPECT imaging has been used in patients with both acute and chronic ischemia to determine areas of infarction, as well as areas of ischemia that are at risk for infarction.3 Although the technique frequently provides only semiquantitative or relative data comparison, it has still been shown to have a good degree of sensitivity and specificity for stroke detection,25 as well as for correlation with stroke volume, response to thrombolytic therapy, and clinical outcome.26,27

Vasospasm

SPECT evidence of hypoperfusion has been shown to correlate with delayed neurological deficits in the setting of SAH.28 It may be able to provide noninvasive evidence of vasospasm when used in conjunction with the transcranial Doppler method.

Balloon Occlusion Testing

SPECT (Fig. 348-4) can be used as an adjunct to angiographic, electroencephalographic, and neurological determination of a patient’s ability to tolerate hypoperfusion in a given vascular territory.

SPECT is easy to use. The injection kit is simple to prepare and readily available, and most stroke centers have SPECT capability. Therefore, semiquantitative maps can be quickly produced to provide guidance in patients with acute or chronic ischemia (or both).

However, the images are nonanatomic and thus need to be combined with either CT or MRI to obtain a detailed determination of the vascular territory at risk. Because the data are semiquantitative, they cannot be compared between patients or institutions, and thus definitive radioisotope uptake targets or guidelines are difficult to obtain.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Based Techniques

High–field strength MRI and improved MRA technology and processing capability have significantly enhanced our ability to reliably and noninvasively assess the neurovascular tree. Specifically, higher strength magnets produce better image quality by increasing the signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution. High-speed computing and more powerful workstations have improved the quality and reduced the time needed for postprocessing. Indeed, specialized algorithms (e.g., short echo time, slow flow, black blood) have improved the ability to isolate useful information in regions of interest. Finally, specialized software has enhanced the ease with which information from complex scanning protocols can be used and displayed.

Magnetic Resonance Angiography

Technique

MRI utilizes radiofrequency (RF) excitation/pulses and specific magnetic localizing fields to enable visualization of variations in proton spin.29,30 Currently, there are a variety of methods by which MRI can be optimized to acquire angiographic data. However, a detailed and exhaustive discussion is beyond the scope of this chapter. For the purposes of introduction, there are three general approaches to MRA: time-of-flight (TOF), phase-contrast (PC), and contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA. In general, direct visualization of blood vessels with TOF or PC techniques is achieved by taking advantage of the dynamic nature of flowing blood in comparison to the static surrounding tissue to create “angiographic contrast” without the use of intravenous agents. CE MRA, however, relies on intravenous agents to provide contrast.

Time of Flight

TOF MRA is based on the principle known as flow-related enhancement (FRE). Briefly, MRI relies on the application of RF excitation pulses to a given section or slice.29,31 Repeated pulses without adequate recovery time can saturate the section and reduce signal intensity. Stationary tissue is subject to repeated pulses and thus has attenuated intensity. Conversely, moving tissue (flowing blood) will not be subject to the saturation effects of repeated pulses because it washes in and out of the imaging plane. As a result, flowing blood appears brighter than the static surrounding tissue. FRE is increased as the vessel approaches a perpendicular orientation with respect to the slice plane. Simply stated, as blood flow velocity increases in the plane perpendicular to the slice, FRE increases. Unfortunately, based on the same principles, imaging of slow flow and in-plane flow can be challenging with the TOF technique.31 As discussed later, use of contrast agents, which helps increase intensity, can partially mitigate this problem.

The typical TOF technique uses gradient-recalled echoes.29,30

Buy Membership for Neurosurgery Category to continue reading. Learn more here