Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

Published on 07/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 07/02/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2145 times

Chapter 15 Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

Since its early days, cardiac surgery has typically involved large incisions with complete access to the heart and great vessels. After the popularization of minimally invasive techniques in general surgery, cardiac surgeons began to experiment with less invasive procedures in the early 1990s. Although the goals of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) are fairly well established as decreased pain, shorter hospital stay, accelerated recuperation, and improved cosmesis, a strict definition of minimally invasive cardiac surgery has been more elusive. “Less invasive” is probably a more appropriate term, because these procedures span a wide spectrum from full sternotomy off-pump procedures to totally endoscopic procedures. There has been an ongoing debate within the specialty whether eliminating sternotomy or cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a more fundamental component of MICS. Some have even argued that cardiac surgery will not be truly minimally invasive until general anesthesia itself is eliminated and a handful of centers have reported on various off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) procedures performed with high thoracic epidural anesthesia alone.

This chapter focuses on the anesthetic implications of operations performed through an incision other than a full sternotomy or thoracotomy and does not address the various endovascular procedures under development. The common incisions used for these procedures are shown in Figure 15-1 and include partial sternotomies (upper vs. lower, unilateral vs. bilateral) and minithoracotomies (anterior vs. anterolateral vs. posterolateral, nonspreading vs. spreading) in addition to totally endoscopic procedures done exclusively through thoracoscopic ports (defined as < 15 mm).

GENERAL ANESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS

Patient Setup

Position, Prepping, and Draping

Conventional cardiac surgery is almost always performed with the patient flat and supine, prepped, and draped with the sterile field extending from mid-neck to the ankles (Box 15-1). Many MICS procedures, however, require different positions and sterile field setups. For example, most procedures performed through anterior minithoracotomies or exclusively thoracoscopically are done with the patient’s left or right side elevated approximately 30 degrees. Some thoracoscopic procedures are performed in the left or right lateral decubitus position, typically with the hips rotated to expose one or both groins for possible femoral vascular cannulation. Unlike conventional sternotomy procedures, surgical access to remote areas (neck, lateral chest wall, groin) may be necessary for peripheral cannulation, placement of camera/instrument ports, or transcutaneous retraction sutures. This should be taken into consideration when placing ECG leads or other items on the skin during setup.

Because, by definition, access to the heart is limited in most MICS, external defibrillator pads should be considered mandatory. Again, care should be taken with placement and draping to ensure the current passes through the heart and that burns associated with seepage of prep solution or other liquids under the pads are avoided.

Anesthetic Technique

Anesthetic Regimen

Because accelerated recovery and discharge are major goals of MICS, it is important to note that careful selection of the anesthetic agents is necessary to ensure that the patient obtains the full benefit from the minimally invasive approach. Most centers will use some sort of “fast-track” anesthesia regimen—typically very short-acting narcotics and muscle relaxants in conjunction with an inhalation agent.2 Some have advocated precise pharmacokinetically controlled total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) regimens. Routine intraoperative extubation of MICS patients is controversial. Although some centers have established protocols whereby nearly all patients are extubated at the completion of the procedure,3 others have argued that a clinical or economic benefit is difficult to document unless the patient recovers in a postoperative acute care unit setting without an overnight stay in the intensive care unit.4

Pain Management

Aggressive pain management is another critical component of the care of patients undergoing MICS, without which it is difficult to obtain the full benefit of this approach. Successful pain management permits intraoperative or early postoperative extubation, early ambulation, and discharge. There is some evidence that the amount of pain in the early postoperative period may not be significantly less in many types of MICS and that it may actually be higher in some, particularly those involving rib-spreading thoracotomies. The pain, however, seems to dissipate more rapidly than with full sternotomy; most patients are off narcotic pain medicines within 1 or 2 weeks of surgery.5

Spinal/Epidural Anesthesia

Spinal and epidural anesthetics have been used as an adjunct to general anesthesia at many institutions practicing MICS. A single intrathecal dose of a long-acting narcotic can be beneficial in reducing intraoperative and postoperative parenteral or enteral narcotic requirements.6 A thoracic epidural catheter with narcotic or local anesthetics can be administered continuously or with patient-controlled dosing.7 The excellent pain control and potential cardioprotective benefits from this approach, however, are mitigated by the additional operative time, the small but finite additional risk from the epidural anesthesia, and its potential to delay the typically rapid mobilization and discharge of MICS patients.

GENERAL CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS CONSIDERATIONS

Although nearly all minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery is performed on a beating heart, without the use of CPB, minimally invasive surgery of the cardiac valves and other intracardiac structures requires creative and innovative techniques to safely establish CPB (Box 15-2). There are a variety of approaches depending on the incision and access to cardiovascular structures. Some minimally invasive approaches permit direct, central cannulation similar to conventional cardiac surgery but typically with relatively small cannulae and vacuum-assisted venous drainage. On the other end of the spectrum, “Port-Access” techniques, pioneered by Heartport, Inc. (Redwood City, CA) in the early 1990s, sought to have all elements of the CPB circuit enter peripherally, preferably percutaneously, to allow procedures to be performed through very small incisions or totally endoscopically. The anesthesiologist plays a central role in all “Port-Access” procedures from insertion of certain cannulae to monitoring cannula position and function by TEE.8