Laparoscopic Management of Adnexal Masses

Published on 10/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1778 times

Chapter 50 Laparoscopic Management of Adnexal Masses

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic management of an adnexal mass was first reported more than 30 years ago. During the past decade, laparoscopy has become the dominant management technique for the majority of adnexal masses. Curiously, laparoscopy was accepted as a better approach than laparotomy for adnexal masses with little supporting experimental evidence. This is similar to the widespread acceptance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, despite a randomized, blinded trial that concluded that the open technique was superior.1

Surgical skill and experience are required to safely and effectively insert trocars and perform laparoscopic surgery. In addition, sound judgment is required to know which patients are appropriate candidates for the laparoscopic approach. The intent of this chapter is to describe not only how to remove an ovarian mass laparoscopically, but also when and in which patients.

The most serious mistake that can be made while surgically managing an ovarian mass is to fail to recognize a malignancy. This will result in inadequate staging of the patient’s disease at the very least. Even worse, the stage of the disease may be unknowingly increased by intraperitoneal seeding of the tumor. Unfortunately, there is no combination of diagnostic tests or algorithms that will absolutely differentiate a malignant from a benign adnexal mass. Conversely, erroneously assuming that all pelvic masses are malignant can lead to increased risks and cost associated with unnecessary surgical interventions.

The surgeon faced with surgical management of a pelvic mass needs to know: (1) the differential diagnosis and biology of ovarian masses, (2) how to use the tests and other diagnostic information to narrow the differential diagnosis, and (3) how and when to surgically evaluate and remove the mass. Laparoscopic management of an ovarian mass requires the surgeon to exercise both skill and wisdom to minimize the potential adverse outcomes.

ADNEXAL MASSES: DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS AND BIOLOGY

Adnexal masses often present a diagnostic challenge. This stems in part from the fact that adnexal masses can arise from several different organs. In addition, ovarian masses can arise as a result of a broad array of pathology.

Extra-ovarian Adnexal Masses

Although the ovary is the most common origin of an adnexal mass, the source can also be the fallopian tubes, the uterus, and even bowel. From any of these organs, a mass can result from hypertrophy, neoplasm, or infection. In a study of 656 women with persistent adnexal masses, 9% were found to originate outside the ovary.2 For this reason, the differential diagnosis of an adnexal mass should always include both ovarian and extraovarian sources (Table 50-1).

Table 50-1 Common Extra-ovarian Sources of Adnexal Masses

Ectopic pregnancy
Hydrosalpinx
Tubo-ovarian abscess
Paraovarian cyst
Peritoneal inclusion cyst
Leiomyoma
Fallopian tube neoplasm
Bowel abscess or neoplasm

Ovarian Tumors

To best diagnose and manage adnexal masses, it is important to understand the biology of the entire spectrum of benign and malignant ovarian tumors.

Functional Ovarian Cysts

Many women are extremely concerned to learn that they have an ovarian cyst. It is important for the clinician to remember that ovulating women normally develop ovarian cysts 2 to 3 cm in diameter every month. These could be physiologic, such as a dominant follicle or corpus luteum, or functional. The term functional is often applied to cysts that arise from a physiologic process related to ovulation. Functional ovarian cysts are not neoplastic, but are the most common incidental ovarian masses detected on physical and/or ultrasonographic examination. These functional cysts exceed 2 cm in most cases and can be associated with both pain and (occasionally in a thin woman) a palpable mass on pelvic examination. Ultrasonography will reveal a simple cyst filled with fluid with low echodensity.

Despite the fact that these physiologic or functional cysts often resolve spontaneously over time, more than 30% of laparoscopies performed to evaluate and manage adnexal masses ultimately find a functional or simple ovarian cyst.3

In some cases, hemorrhage into a functional cyst at the time of ovulation can result in ovarian enlargement and persistent pain. Ultrasonography in these cases will reveal a characteristic complex cyst partially filled with areas of high echodensity. The sudden occurrence of symptoms near midcycle and the spontaneous resolution of the cyst over weeks to months differentiate a hemorrhagic corpus luteal cyst from endometriomas or other more ominous lesions.

Observation with serial ultrasonography is the most common management for functional ovarian cysts as well. Follow-up ultrasonography in 4 to 6 weeks usually demonstrates partial or complete resolution. Although the presence of a functional cyst larger than 2 cm might increase the risk of ovarian torsion, the relatively remote risk of this emergency does not justify more aggressive preventive management.

Surgical management is sometimes required for patients with apparently functional cysts who experience severe and prolonged pain unresponsive to medical management to exclude intermittent torsion or other pathology.

Removal of functional cysts is usually somewhat bloody and can rarely be performed without rupturing the cyst. Fortunately, rupturing a functional cyst has no known adverse effect. In some cases, the cyst wall can be completely removed by peeling this thin layer from the enclosing ovarian epithelium. In most cases, this is difficult because of the frailty of the cyst wall, and a small section can be sent for histologic examination to verify that the cyst is functional in nature.

The risk of malignancy is influenced by the cell type of origin, with approximately 90% of malignancies arising from epithelial cells. The cell type origin of ovarian tumors varies according to the woman’s age.

These three groups have some anatomic correlation. Epithelial cells cover the surface of the ovary. The remainder of the ovary is made up of stroma, which can be further divided into the cortex and medullary portions. Germ cells are contained primarily in the cortical portion of the ovary, whereas sex cord cells are contained primarily in the medullary portion. Stromal cells are contained throughout the ovary.

Several clinical risk factors have been identified that increase the risk that any ovarian mass will be a malignant neoplasm. One of the most important is age. Before age 15, many ovarian tumors are malignant.5 In woman between ages 20 and 45, only the minority of ovarian tumors will be malignant. The risk increases with age thereafter, such that an ovarian tumor discovered in a woman between ages 60 and 69 is 12 times more likely to be malignant than a tumor in a woman between ages 20 and 29.6 Other important risk factors for malignant tumors include a positive family history and nulliparity.

SPECIFIC OVARIAN NEOPLASMS

The ovary is a complex and dynamic structure that is associated with an extensive list of benign and malignant neoplasms, and the obstetrician/gynecologist must ultimately be familiar with all of these. The following is a brief description of some of the most commonly encountered ovarian neoplasms.

Epithelial Cell Tumors

Serous and mucinous tumors are the most common ovarian epithelial cell tumors, and the majority are benign (Table 50-3). The fact that they are mostly benign allows a laparoscopic approach.

Table 50-3 Frequency of Malignancy of Ovarian Neoplasms

Type Percent of Tumor Type
Serous
Benign 60%
Borderline 15%
Malignant 25%
Mucinous
Benign 80%
Borderline 10%
Malignant 10%
Teratoma
Benign 96%
Malignant 4%

From Cotran RS, Kumar V, Collins T, Robbins SL: Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1999.

Mucinous

Mucinous cystadenomas and cystadenocarcinomas are also very common, accounting for 20% of ovarian tumors and 10% of malignancies. They can attain a huge size, often filling the entire pelvic and abdominal cavities. Compared to serous ovarian tumors, they are more often unilateral, large, and multiloculated. These loculations contain thick gelatinous fluid. On histologic examination, mucinous tumors are lined with nonciliated columnar cells. Approximately 80% of mucinous ovarian neoplasms are benign, 10% are borderline, and 10% are frankly malignant.

Mucinous cystadenomas account for 25% of all benign ovarian neoplasms. Their peak incidence of occurrence is between ages 30 and 50, and they are bilateral in 5% of cases.

Borderline and malignant mucinous tumors tend to occur in slightly older women, with a peak incidence of occurrence between ages 40 and 70. Malignant mucinous cystadenocarcinomas make up 10% of primary malignant ovarian neoplasms and are bilateral in up to 20% of cases. The 10-year survival rate is approximately 34%.

Mucinous tumors can be associated with an uncommon malignancy called pseudomyxoma peritonei. This condition is characterized by metastatic spread of well-differentiated mucin-secreting columnar cells along the peritoneal surfaces, usually from a primary mucinous tumor of the appendix. It is believed that this condition can result from intraperitoneal spillage of the contents of a borderline or malignant mucinous ovarian tumor. However, most cystic ovarian mucinous tumors associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei will be found to be metastases from a primary appendiceal tumor.

Endometrioid carcinomas and clear-cell carcinomas make up 20% and 6% of all malignant ovarian neoplasms, respectively, and are bilateral in 40% of cases.

Germ Cell Tumors

Teratomas

Teratomas are the most common ovarian germ cell tumors and can be either benign (mature) or malignant (immature). Mature cystic teratomas are benign tumors commonly referred to as dermoids and account for about 25% of ovarian neoplasms. They are most common during reproductive life and are often incidental findings. Although 20% of dermoids are bilateral, it is not recommended to bivalve the ovary in search of a dermoid that is not seen on preoperative ultrasound.

Mature cystic teratomas are derived from at least two of the three germ layers: ectoderm, endoderm, and mesoderm. Most frequently, their cyst walls contain skin with sebaceous glands and hair follicles and thus contain greasy, yellow sebaceous material and hair. Less commonly, these tumors include cartilage, bone, thyroid tissue, or other structures. Struma ovarii is a particular type of mature teratoma comprised of more than 80% thyroid tissue and can be associated with hyperthyroidism.

Immature teratomas are rare, making up only 4% of ovarian teratomas. Unlike the pattern seen in most ovarian tumors, immature teratomas are more frequent at a younger age, and most present before age 18. Histologically, immature teratomas are composed of partially differentiated structures that resemble fetal or embryonal cell types. Neural elements, cartilage, and epithelial tissues are common. Immature teratomas are often solid; most are unilateral, in contrast to mature cystic teratomas.

Treatment for immature teratomas consists of surgical resection of the affected ovary and postoperative chemotherapy. In younger patients, an attempt is made to preserve fertility by conserving the uterus and unaffected ovary. The 5-year survival rate is between 60% and 90%, depending on the grade and stage of the tumor.

PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION OF AN OVARIAN MASS

The most important diagnostic questions to be answered before surgery are (1) What is the origin of the mass? and (2) Is it benign or malignant? Although bimanual pelvic examination is the time-honored method of screening for pelvic masses, this technique has marked limitations for evaluating adnexa, especially in the presence of obesity, uterine enlargement, or abdominal scarring.12 History, physical examination, and ultrasonography can usually determine the origin of an adnexal mass.

For ovarian masses, a combination of pelvic examination, ultrasonography, and serum CA-125 level is the best way to determine the risk of malignancy.1214 Certain ultrasonographic characteristics have been found to be strongly associated with malignancy (see Chapter 30). Ovarian tumors are more likely to be malignant if ultrasonography reveals them to be multiloculated, septated, mixed cystic and solid, bilateral, or associated with ascites.15 However, almost two thirds of multilocular and solid tumors will be benign.16,17

Combining serum CA-125 with these ultrasound criteria has been used in women who are postmenopausal as the risk of malignancy index.15 Other investigators have found color flow Doppler ultrasonography to be helpful, because an ovarian lesion is more likely to be malignant if a solid element of the mass demonstrates central blood flow.18

Multiple preoperative assessment models have been developed for adnexal masses.1628 A significant limitation of many of these models is that they were developed and validated on the same population. Mol and colleagues tested the external validity of most of these models and found that although they could be of value in preoperative assessment, their diagnostic performance was not as good as reported in their original publications.27

None of the externally validated likelihood ratios are sufficiently great as to be diagnostically conclusive.27 Likelihood ratios are the likelihood that a given test result would be expected in a patient with the target disorder compared to the likelihood that that same result would be expected in a patient without the target disorder. Although likelihood ratios may not be as familiar a concept as sensitivity and specificity, they are calculated from these values and are a more logical means of understanding diagnostic value. Pretest probability can be multiplied by the likelihood ratio of a given test to render the post-test probability. Likelihood ratio values can be positive (rule in a diagnosis) or negative (rule out a diagnosis).

What is curious about these models is the relative consistency of the likelihood ratio results and that additional information, such as age and menopausal status, does not dramatically alter the likelihood ratio results between the studies. Unfortunately, these models have significant rates of false-negative and false-positive results, regardless of the criteria and cutoff values used. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists (SGO) have jointly published guidelines that help determine when a women with a newly diagnosed pelvic mass should be referred to a gynecologic oncologist (Table 50-4).29 This conservative model accurately predicts which women with ovarian masses are at low risk of malignancy, with a negative predictive value of 92% for premenopausal and 91% for postmenopausal women.30 However, the women at highest risk according to this model will often be found to have a benign lesion, with a positive predictive value of 34% for premenopausal and 60% for postmenopausal women.

Table 50-4 Society of Gynecologic Oncologists and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Referral Guidelines for a Newly Diagnosed Pelvic Mass*

* Women with pelvic masses who meet these criteria should be referred to a gynecologic oncologist.

From ACOG: The role of the generalist obstetrician-gynecologist in the early delection of ovarian cancer. ACOG Committee Opinion no. 280, December 2002. Obstet Gynecol 100:1413–1416, 2002.

SURGICAL APPROACH

Laparoscopy versus Laparotomy

An important question that must be answered whenever a patient presents with an ovarian mass is whether the mass should be approached laparoscopically or via laparotomy. The answer is not simple and will ultimately depend on the experience and philosophy of the physician and the desires of the patient.

A useful approach for the woman presenting with a pelvic mass has been proposed, which places each patient into one of three risk categories for having a malignancy: low, intermediate, and high (Fig. 50-1).22 A woman at low risk can be observed for 3 months or evaluated with diagnostic laparoscopy according to the patient’s preference. A woman at intermediate risk can be evaluated with diagnostic laparoscopy. Laparoscopic treatment of the mass is appropriate in the absence of surgical evidence of malignancy. Women at high (10% or greater) risk of malignancy should be evaluated surgically, most commonly via laparotomy. In select circumstances, laparoscopy can be used for surgical evaluation, assuming that the laparoscopist has both the appropriate experience and gynecologic oncologist backup.

Intraoperative Tumor Rupture

Intraoperative rupture of some ovarian cysts that are later found to be malignant is unavoidable, regardless of the preoperative criteria or surgical approached used. One study of 32 patients found an overall rate of tumor rupture of 25% for laparoscopy compared to 9% for laparotomy.31 This occurrence appears to worsen the patient’s prognosis, although there are conflicting data. Although some studies have found no impact of intraoperative tumor rupture on subsequent survival,3234 others have shown decreased survival.3538

The only prospective assessment of the impact of intraoperative tumor rupture found a significantly lower survival rate for women with stage I ovarian carcinoma after rupture, although not as low as for women whose tumor ruptured spontaneously before surgery.38 The greatest impact of intraoperative rupture was for serous tumors, where the 9-year survival rate declined from 86% to 50%. Furthermore, many oncologists will recommend chemotherapy after an intraoperative spill of a well-differentiated stage I a cancer that usually would not have received such treatment. Certainly, spillage of cyst contents into the peritoneal cavity should be avoided when ovarian malignancy is a possibility.

One factor that contributes to inadequate staging at the initial surgery is the discordance between intraoperative frozen section and subsequent diagnosis based on permanent section. Making a diagnosis of borderline malignancy is especially difficult on frozen section. Several studies have documented a greater than 5% discordance between these two techniques.40,41

The problem is that patients erroneously determined intraoperatively to have benign disease based on frozen section are unlikely to be adequately staged. In light of the inherent inaccuracy associated with frozen section, surgeons should consider staging patients with suspicious ovarian masses even if the interoperative diagnosis is benign. Moreover, surgeons should discuss intraoperative diagnostic limitations with their patients before surgery, irrespective of approach.

LAPAROSCOPY APPROACH FOR OVARIAN MASSES

Laparoscopic management of properly selected ovarian masses has become a standard part of modern obstetrics and gynecology.3 In one study of 396 women who underwent laparoscopy for a low-risk adnexal mass, only 2% of patients were ultimately found to have a malignancy.3 This low rate is related both to a low prevalence of malignancy among women with ovarian cysts in a general population and the efficacy of preoperative diagnostic testing. Because the possibility of a malignancy can never be eliminated preoperatively in patients with an ovarian mass, consideration should be given to obtaining consent for an open staging procedure in patients with a suspicious mass.

Laparoscopic Oophorectomy

Laparoscopic oophorectomy is an important technique to be mastered by obstetrician/gynecologists. In addition to minimizing the risk of intraperitoneal spill of ovarian cyst contents, special efforts need to be made to avoid ureteral injury.

Knowing the course of the ureters and their relation to the ovarian blood vessels is essential. The ovarian artery originates from the abdominal aorta and courses with the ovarian vein and lymphatics through the infundibulopelvic ligament (i.e., ovarian suspensory ligament). At the superior end of the infundibulopelvic ligament, the ureter crosses beneath the ovarian vessels. The ureter then courses immediately beneath the ovary in the retroperitoneal space adjacent to the peritoneum. It is at these two locations that the ureter is at risk of injury during oophorectomy.

The first step in a laparoscopic oophorectomy is to identify the ureter. If the ureter can be clearly identified transperitoneally by its peristalsis and found to be safely beneath the level of the infundibulopelvic ligament, oophorectomy can be performed without opening the pelvic sidewall peritoneum. However, in cases where the ureter cannot be seen because of obesity, adhesions, or thickened peritoneum, the pelvic sidewall peritoneum should be opened. The infundibulopelvic ligament is put on tension and the peritoneum is opened to identify the ureter. The ovarian vessels are skeletonized and occluded using one of a variety of techniques: bipolar cautery, ultrasonic scalpel, a stapling device, or an endoligature (Fig. 50-2). Careful dissection using scissors or one of these power sources is then used to isolate and occlude the utero-ovarian ligament, thereby separating the ovary and tube from their attachments. The dissection bed should be inspected for hemostasis before removal of the ovary from the peritoneal cavity. At the conclusion of laparoscopy, the hemostasis of all vascular pedicles should be reevaluated as the intra-abdominal insufflation pressure is decreased.

Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy

For women with ovarian cysts at low risk of being malignant who desire to maintain their fertility, an ovarian cystectomy is often the best option. With the exception of functional cysts and endometriomas, the cyst wall of benign ovarian cysts can often be easily separated from the ovarian cortex and the cyst removed intact from the peritoneal cavity intact. The goal is to preserve as much normal ovarian cortex as possible, because this is the area containing primordial follicles. In cases where little ovarian tissue remains, the contribution of a small remnant to subsequent fertility and hormone secretion may be minimal.

As with oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy begins with collection of peritoneal washings and careful inspection of the peritoneum for signs of possible implants. Considerable finesse is then required to remove ovarian cysts intact without spillage. Ovarian cysts are ordinarily contained beneath a layer of ovarian epithelium that can be extremely thin. To begin a cystectomy, the ovarian tissue overlying the cyst must be carefully incised without rupturing the cyst. Having carefully inspected the ovary, a site on the ovary should be selected that appears (1) to have the thinnest layer between the cortex and the cyst wall and (2) to have good laparoscopic exposure. Some surgeons use monopolar cautery with the cutting current set at 10 amperes for this purpose. Others prefer gently incising the tissue with sharp scissors.

Once a defect is made, the ovarian tissue is bluntly separated from the cyst wall (Fig. 50-3A). The ovarian cortex is held with a grasper and gently peeled away from the underlying cyst (see Fig. 50-3B). This can be facilitated with aid of water dissection from the laparoscopic suction–irrigator. In areas where connections between the cortex and cyst wall do not separate easily, sharp dissection should be used to avoid cyst rupture and spill.

Removal of the Ovary or Cyst from the Peritoneal Cavity

Once the ovary or a cyst has been excised, the next challenge is to remove the specimen from the peritoneal cavity without spilling any cyst fluid into the peritoneal cavity. The ideal approach is to place the entire specimen intact into a retrieval bag for extraction.

Cyst Aspiration and Morcellation in the Bag

After the specimen is placed into the retrieval bag, the opening of the bag is drawn up into one of the port sleeves. A 10-mm suprapubic or lateral port is usually used, but the umbilical port can also be used if the laparoscope is first placed through an alternative port. The selected incision is encircled with absorbent material to prevent inadvertent fluid contamination of the subcutaneous tissue during specimen extraction. The port sleeve containing the bag opening is removed from the abdominal wall, thus delivering the bag opening through the trocar incision (Figure 50-4).

At this point, ovarian cyst contents can be aspirated with little risk of spillage into the peritoneal cavity. Care must be taken to avoid puncturing a polymer bag with the aspiration needle. When the solid portion of the ovary is too large to deliver through the fascial incision, the resected tissue must be morcellated. Grasping and removing small pieces of the ovary with a Kocher forceps while the specimen remains within the intra-abdominal portion of the bag can do this. Once enough tissue has been removed, the bag and the remaining contents can be delivered though the incision with gentle twisting traction. Excessive traction will rupture a polymer bag, releasing its contents into the peritoneal cavity. In some cases, the fascial incision must be extended. It is important to remember that most manufacturers of retrieval bags do not recommend morcellation within the bag but rather extending the incision to accommodate the intact removal of the cyst.

An alternative method for removing large specimens is to use a colpotomy incision, because the vagina and peritoneum are more distensible than the abdominal wall muscle and fascia. After the specimen has been placed in a bag, a colpotomy incision can be performed laparoscopically with a power-cutting device while tenting the posterior cul-de-sac with a vaginal probe. The closed bag is transferred to a vaginal grasping instrument for removal. Alternatively, a 10-mm laparoscopic probe can be carefully placed through the posterior vaginal fornix so that the pneumoperitoneum is maintained and standard laparoscopic instruments can be used for removal. The colpotomy incision is closed either laparoscopically or transvaginally.

After removal of a suspicious mass, a frozen section can be obtained to determine if it is malignant, although this is not as accurate as a permanent section. The approach for the remainder of the surgery can be based on the presumptive diagnosis. The defect in the ovary is usually not closed. Suture on the cortex can increase adhesion formation. Occasionally with a large defect an interrupted stitch can be placed deep within the cavity to approximate the bivalve ovary.

Laparoscopic Endometrioma Resection

Removal of an endometrioma is referred to as cystectomy, but the procedure is markedly different from that used for other ovarian cysts. Endometrioma cyst walls are usually densely adherent to the overlying ovarian tissue. This makes it difficult or impossible to find a surgical plane in many patients, and removing an endometrioma cyst wall intact is rarely possible.

The first step in removal of an endometrioma is mobilization of the ovary from any adhesions to the pelvic sidewall or adjacent organs. Many endometriomas will rupture at this point and exude thick “chocolate” fluid. If the cyst remains intact, it will often rupture as the ovarian epithelium covering the cyst is incised.

The edge of the cyst wall is separated from the ovarian tissue and is stripped using a combination of blunt and sharp dissection (Fig. 50-5A and B). Bleeding is common from the dissection bed, and bipolar cautery can be used to cauterize bleeding sites (see Fig. 50-5C). Excessive use of cautery can cause ovarian damage. The cyst wall is then placed in an endoscopic retrieval bag and extracted through a port incision.

The specimen should be sent for microscopic evaluation, because malignancies can sometimes be indistinguishable from endometriomas. Excessive removal of ovarian tissue will diminish ovarian reserve.

REFERENCES

1 Majeed AW, Troy G, Nicholl JP, et al. Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy. Lancet. 1996;347:989-994.

2 Guerriero S, Alcazar JL, Ajossa S, et al. Comparison of conventional color Doppler imaging and power Doppler imaging for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer: Results of a European study. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;83:299-304.

3 Havrilesky LJ, Peterson BL, Dryden DK, et al. Predictors of clinical outcomes in the laparoscopic management of adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:243-251.

4 Attaran M, Falcone T, Goldberg J. Endometriosis: Still tough to diagnose and treat. Cleve Clin J Med. 2002;69:647-653.

5 Norris HJ, Jensen RD. Relative frequency of ovarian neoplasms in children and adolescents. Cancer. 1972;30:713-719.

6 Koonings PP, Campbell K, Mishell DRJr., Grimes DA. Relative frequency of primary ovarian neoplasms: A 10-year review. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74:921-926.

7 Huss M, Lafay-Pillet MC, Lecuru F, et al. [Granulomatous peritonitis after laparoscopic surgery of an ovarian dermoid cyst. Diagnosis, management, prevention: A case report]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1996;25:365-372.

8 Chen L, Nelson SD, Berek JS. Recurrent mature cystic teratoma presenting as a perihepatic mass. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:856.

9 Lin P, Falcone T, Tulandi T. Excision of ovarian dermoid cyst by laparoscopy and by laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:769-771.

10 Nezhat CR, Kalyoncu S, Nezhat CH, et al. Laparoscopic management of ovarian dermoid cysts: Ten years’ experience. JSLS. 1999;3:179-184.

11 Templeman CL, Hertweck SP, Scheetz JP, et al. The management of mature cystic teratomas in children and adolescents: A retrospective analysis. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2669-2672.

12 Padilla LA, Radosevich DM, Milad MP. Accuracy of the pelvic examination in detecting adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:593-598.

13 Schutter EM, Kenemans P, Sohn C, et al. Diagnostic value of pelvic examination, ultrasound, and serum CA 125 in postmenopausal women with a pelvic mass. An international multicenter study. Cancer. 1994;74:1398-1406.

14 Guerriero S, Mallarini G, Ajossa S, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound and computed tomography combined with clinical parameters and CA-125 determinations in the differential diagnosis of persistent ovarian cysts in premenopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;9:339-343.

15 Andersen ES, Knudsen A, Rix P, Johansen B. Risk of malignancy index in the preoperative evaluation of patients with adnexal masses. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90:109-112.

16 Finkler NJ, Benacerraf B, Lavin PT, et al. Comparison of serum CA 125, clinical impression, and ultrasound in the preoperative evaluation of ovarian masses. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;72:659-664.

17 Granberg S, Wikland M, Jansson I. Macroscopic characterization of ovarian tumors and the relation to the histological diagnosis: Criteria to be used for ultrasound evaluation. Gynecol Oncol. 1989;35:139-144.

18 Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Garau N, et al. Ultrasonography and color Doppler-based triage for adnexal masses to provide the most appropriate surgical approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:401-406.

19 Davies AP, Jacobs I, Woolas R, et al. The adnexal mass: Benign or malignant? Evaluation of a risk of malignancy index. BJOG. 1993;100:927-931.

20 Strigini FA, Gadducci A, Del Bravo B, et al. Differential diagnosis of adnexal masses with transvaginal sonography, color flow imaging, and serum CA 125 assay in pre- and postmenopausal women. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;61:68-72.

21 Predanic M, Vlahos N, Pennisi JA, et al. Color and pulsed Doppler sonography, gray-scale imaging, and serum CA 125 in the assessment of adnexal disease. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:283-288.

22 Roman LD, Muderspach LI, Stein SM, et al. Pelvic examination, tumor marker level, and gray-scale and Doppler sonography in the prediction of pelvic cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:493-500.

23 Alcazar JL, Jurado M. Using a logistic model to predict malignancy of adnexal masses based on menopausal status, ultrasound morphology, and color Doppler findings. Gynecol Oncol. 1998;69:146-150.

24 Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Risalvato A, et al. Diagnosis of adnexal malignancies by using color Doppler energy imaging as a secondary test in persistent masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;11:277-282.

25 Alcazar JL, Errasti T, Zornoza A, et al. Transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography and CA-125 in suspicious adnexal masses. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999;66:255-261.

26 Kobal B, Rakar S, Ribic-Pucelj M, et al. Pretreatment evaluation of adnexal tumors predicting ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1999;9:481-486.

27 Mol BW, Boll D, De Kanter M, et al. Distinguishing the benign and malignant adnexal mass: An external validation of prognostic models. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;80:162-167.

28 Mancuso A, De Vivo A, Triolo O, Irato S. The role of transvaginal ultrasonography and serum CA 125 assay combined with age and hormonal state in the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2004;25:207-210.

29 ACOG. The role of the generalist obstetrician-gynecologist in the early detection of ovarian cancer. ACOG Committee Opinion no. 280, December 2002. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:1413-1416.

30 Im SS, Gordon AN, Buttin BM, et al. Validation of referral guidelines for women with pelvic masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:35-41.

31 Gal D, Lind L, Lovecchio JL, Kohn N. Comparative study of laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for adnexal surgery: Efficacy, safety, and cyst rupture. J Gynecol Surg. 1995;11:153-158.

32 Vergote I, De Brabanter J, Fyles A, et al. Prognostic importance of degree of differentiation and cyst rupture in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Lancet. 2001;357:176-182.

33 Sainz de la Cuesta R, Goff BA, Fuller AFJr, et al. Prognostic importance of intraoperative rupture of malignant ovarian epithelial neoplasms. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:1-7.

34 Kodama S, Tanaka K, Tokunaga A, et al. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in patients with ovarian cancer stage I and II. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997;56:147-153.

35 Dembo AJ, Davy M, Stenwig AE, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:263-273.

36 Ahmed FY, Wiltshaw E, A’Hern RP, et al. Natural history and prognosis of untreated stage I epithelial ovarian carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:2968-2975.

37 Sjovall K, Nilsson B, Einhorn N. Different types of rupture of the tumor capsule and the impact on survival in early ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1994;4:333-336.

38 Mizuno M, Kikkawa F, Shibata K, et al. Long-term prognosis of stage I ovarian carcinoma. Prognostic importance of intraoperative rupture. Oncology. 2003;65:29-36.

39 Young RC, Decker DG, Wharton JT, et al. Staging laparotomy in early ovarian cancer. JAMA. 1983;250:3072-3076.

40 Rose PG, Rubin RB, Nelson BE, et al. Accuracy of frozen-section (intraoperative consultation) diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:823-826.

41 Boriboonhirunsarn D, Sermboon A. Accuracy of frozen section in the diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumor. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004;30:394-399.

42 Cotran RS, Kumar V, Collins T, Robbins SL. Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1999.