Laminotomy, Laminectomy, Laminoplasty, and Foraminotomy

Published on 02/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurosurgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 5286 times

Chapter 53 Laminotomy, Laminectomy, Laminoplasty, and Foraminotomy

Thoracic and lumbar laminotomy and laminectomy are two of the more commonly performed spine procedures. They have changed little since the 1930s but have been refined with the advent of magnification and microtechnique, microinstrumentation, and power tools. These advances, along with use of perioperative antibiotics and better neurodiagnostic tests, have reduced the incidence of complications of these procedures.

The surgical management of thoracic and lumbar laminectomy, laminotomy, laminoplasty, and foraminotomy may be divided into four strategies and components: (1) positioning, (2) exposure of the spine, (3) decompression, and (4) wound closure. Important perioperative aspects include prophylactic antibiotics, which should be administered within 1 hour prior to surgery to reduce risk of infection, and mechanical prophylaxis measures, such as pneumatic compressive stockings, which should be utilized to reduce the risk of deep venous thrombosis.

Positioning

Positioning for thoracic and lumbar decompressive surgery is dictated by the level of the spine being operated upon. Exposure of the upper thoracic spine requires that the patient be prone with the neck moderately flexed, the arms at the side, and the shoulders depressed (Fig. 53-1). Middle and lower thoracic spine exposure requires that the patient be prone, with the arms either at the side or abducted at the shoulders and flexed at the elbows (Fig. 53-2). We recommend that head tongs, such as Gardner-Wells tongs, be used to allow the head to hang freely, thereby avoiding external pressure on the eyes and reducing intraocular pressure. In addition, we prefer that the head of the bed be elevated to reduce facial swelling, which can contribute to airway edema (see Fig. 53-2B). Lumbar exposure may be facilitated in either the prone position, kneeling position (Fig. 53-3), knee-chest position, or lateral decubitus position. The important common feature of all of these positions is the absence of abdominal compression, reducing intra-abdominal pressure and epidural bleeding. It is important to limit hip and knee flexion to approximately 90 degrees or slightly greater to avoid hyperflexion of the knees, which can result in calf swelling and possible compartment syndrome (see Fig. 53-3C). The prone and kneeling position, as compared with the lateral decubitus position, allows complete exposure of the dorsal elements from the cranium to the sacrum. It allows the surgical assistant to have an adequate view of the vertebral column and allows at least four hands to be available to help with the procedure. Surgeries are currently rarely done in the lateral decubitus position. There are, however, potential disadvantages of the prone position. These include restriction of thoracic expansion, compression of the abdominal viscera (producing increased venous pressure in the epidural venous plexus), and the potential for ocular and peripheral nerve compression. These disadvantages can be obviated by use of a Jackson operating table with Gardner-Wells skull traction, as was noted earlier in the chapter (see Fig. 53-2B). This setup allows the abdomen to hang freely, thereby eliminating abdominal compression, and suspends the head, thereby eliminating the potential for ocular pressure and facial abrasions.

To position for upper thoracic procedures (T1-5), the head is placed in three-point fixation using Mayfield tongs (see Fig 53-1) to provide stability to the lower cervical and upper thoracic spine. Ophthalmic ointment is applied to the eyes, which are taped shut prior to prone positioning. If head tongs are not employed, plastic goggles may be utilized to minimize the risk of pressure on the eyes. Compression stockings and serial venous compression devices should be placed on the patient’s legs to reduce the likelihood of deep venous thrombosis and possible pulmonary embolus. In turning the patient to the prone position, care is taken to prevent twisting the neck. The patient is log-rolled onto soft bolsters that extend from the shoulders to the pelvis, allowing the weight to be carried at these four points and allowing the chest to expand and the abdomen to be free from compression. The skeletal head holder is positioned so that the cervical spine is mildly flexed (“military position”). All bony prominences, particularly the elbows, are padded, and the arms are tucked to the side. Exposure can be facilitated by using 3-inch-wide adhesive tape to depress the shoulders by extending the tape from the tip of one shoulder to the opposite side of the table in a crisscross fashion, ensuring that the cross occurs at the thoracolumbar region and does not involve the upper thoracic region. Care must be exercised to avoid extreme shoulder depression, which can produce a traction injury to the brachial plexus. The operative table is then tilted in a mild, reverse Trendelenburg position to elevate the head in relation to the feet and to place the upper thoracic vertebrae parallel to the floor (see Figs. 53-1 and 53-2B).

Positioning for exposure of the lower thoracic spine is identical to that for the upper thoracic spine except that the arms may be either left at the side or abducted to 90 degrees at the shoulder with the elbows flexed 90 degrees. It is important to check the patient’s shoulder motion preoperatively to be sure that the shoulders are capable of 90 degrees of abduction. In addition, care must be exercised to avoid shoulder abduction beyond 90 degrees, which can result in a painful shoulder postoperatively.

Positioning for lumbar spine exposure may be prone, lateral decubitus position, or knee-chest position. Our preference is either the kneeling position on an Andrews operating table (see Fig. 53-3A) or modified kneeling frame (see Fig. 53-3B) or the knee-chest position. These positions avoid abdominal compression, thereby reducing epidural bleeding. It is important to check preoperatively that the patient is able to flex both hips and knees to 90 degrees. The kneeling types of positioning are generally not appropriate for patients who weigh more than 300 pounds because of the risk of pressure blisters on the knees with prolonged kneeling. For most adults, this is an excellent method of positioning for lumbar exposures. The authors have used this position without difficulty for many patients in the late stages of pregnancy. If the Andrews table is used, it is important to measure the chest-to-knee distance accurately before turning the patient to the prone position. As with all face-down positioning, eye protection is necessary, and venous compression stockings and alternating leg compression devices (pneumatic compression stockings) are important. The patient’s feet should be padded before they are placed in the stirrups of the Andrews table. As the patient is being slid into the knee-chest position, it is important to keep sliding until the thighs are flexed 90 to 95 degrees. The buttocks board should be placed high on the buttocks so that it does not compress the sciatic nerves in the upper thigh. The arms are abducted 90 degrees at the shoulders, and the elbows are flexed 90 degrees, with padding of the axilla and the elbow to prevent peripheral nerve compression.

Exposure of the Spine

It is mandatory that the correct operative levels are identified and confirmed radiographically. In comparing intraoperative levels to the preoperative imaging study, it is important that the counting be done in a standardized manner. This is straightforward in the lumbar spine, where both the radiographic level and the intraoperative level are counted upward (cephalad) from the sacrum. It is also straightforward in the cervical spine, where the counting is performed caudally, beginning from the occiput. However, the identification of the precise level can be difficult in the midthoracic spine, where easily identifiable radiographic landmarks are not usually present. Two radiographs spanning both the lumbar and lower thoracic spine to accurately identify a mid-lower thoracic vertebra, or two radiographs spanning the cervical and upper thoracic spine to identify an upper-mid thoracic level may be required. Radiographic confirmation of thoracic levels can also be obtained by intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging.

The skin preparation should be much larger than the area that is to be exposed so that if additional unanticipated exposure is necessary, the incision can be extended without entering an unprepped area. Hemostasis may be improved by injecting 0.5% lidocaine (Xylocaine) with epinephrine 1:200,000 along the incision line. The incision is carried down to the deep fascia. The subcutaneous fat is reflected off the deep fascia with a periosteal elevator. Small perforating vessels are coagulated and divided as they penetrate the thoracolumbar fascia. If unilateral exposure of the vertebral column is performed, as in the case of a unilateral hemilaminotomy or hemilaminectomy, the deep fascia is incised just lateral to the spinous process, leaving a few millimeters of fascia to facilitate closure. Electrocautery can be used to dissect the paraspinous muscle tendinous attachments from the spine and laminae. Alternatively, a periosteal elevator and sponge packing can be used to expose the laminae and obtain hemostasis. Care is taken not to injure the facet capsules as the muscles are retracted laterally. The exposure should be extensive enough that the laminae overlying each pathologic level of neural compression are exposed. A long muscle release also allows less retraction of the muscles. The muscles may be held by a self-retaining retractor. Particular attention should be paid to obtaining meticulous hemostasis before proceeding with the bony decompression.

Decompression

It is important that the surgeon be aware of all the potential sources of nerve compression (stenosis). These include central stenosis, lateral recess stenosis, foraminal stenosis, and extraforaminal compression. When more than one site of neural compression exists, the surgeon may elect to treat all of the sources or limit the decompression to the more severe sources when there is a concern about potential instability from excessive bone removal.

For complete (bilateral) laminectomies, the spinous processes are removed with a Horsley rongeur. The base of the spinous process and superficial lamina can be thinned with a Lexel rongeur. The laminectomy can be completed with either a high-speed drill or a Kerrison rongeur. Once the laminae have been removed and the underlying cauda equina or spinal cord is exposed, it is important that instruments not be passed over the exposed dura, since an inadvertently dropped instrument could produce significant spinal cord or nerve injury. Care must be exercised in using a high-speed power bur, as it can “jump,” even in expert hands. Using two hands may provide additional stability and prevent dural or neural injury. Paradoxically, there is more stability and less tendency for the bur to jump in drilling at a higher rate of speed than at a very slow rate.

In decompressing a highly stenotic canal at the spinal cord level, it is always safer to begin the decompression at a normal or minimally stenotic segment rather than at the most stenotic segment. Decompression of a highly stenotic L4-5 segment, for example, is more safely initiated at the L5-S1 level, which is rarely severely narrowed. Thinning the lamina with a high-speed bur will facilitate decompression by permitting use of a smaller Kerrison rongeur having a smaller foot plate. Trying to force a bigger rongeur with a larger foot plate into a stenotic canal can result in inadvertent injury to the spinal cord or cauda equina (Fig. 53-4). An alternative technique is to use a high-speed bur to create bilateral troughs in order to remove the lamina en bloc. This also offers the option to leave the dorsal arch intact so that it may be replaced and secured with miniplate fixation if considering a laminoplasty (Fig. 53-5). Although not commonly performed in the lumbar spine, this has been described as an option in a skeletally immature spine to prevent a delayed spine deformity.

Some surgeons prefer to remove as much bone as possible before removing the ligamentum flavum, since the latter provides additional protection to the underlying nerves or spinal cord. Since the ligamentum flavum attaches approximately halfway up on the ventral surface of the cephalad lamina, removal of the inferior half of the lamina exposes the origin of the ligamentum. A small straight or angled curette can be used to separate the ligamentum from the ventral surface of the lamina to facilitate insertion of a Kerrison punch. A dural separator can then be passed beneath the ligamentum, which can then be incised longitudinally by using a scalpel and then removed piecemeal with a Kerrison rongeur (Fig. 53-6). It is essential that the ligament be completely free of any adhesions to the underlying dura before it is removed. When the dura is tightly adherent to the overlying ligamentum flavum or to a synovial cyst, dural tears are more likely to occur. Great care and gentle dissection are required to free such adhesions before the ligament is removed.

The laminectomy may be widened by undercutting the facet joints by using a high-speed bur, a Kerrison rongeur, or even a sharp chisel. Since large bites with an angled punch could result in excessive bone removal from the facet joint or the pars interarticularis, a high-speed bur may be used to thin the lamina so that a smaller punch can be used to remove residual compressive bone without injuring the facet joint. In using a high-speed bur to undercut the facet joint, a cottonoid should be placed over the dura for protection (Fig. 53-7). Although not commonly used any more, a sharp chisel can also be used to loosen the bone before removing it with a small angled Kerrison punch. Epidural venous bleeders should be controlled with bipolar coagulation, and bone bleeding can be reduced with bone wax. If a lumbar facet is inadvertently fractured, the fractured fragments are generally removed.

Although inadvertent durotomy may occur with either a high-speed power bur or a Kerrison rongeur, it is the latter that is the most common cause of dural injury. When a durotomy is encountered, it is important that it be repaired promptly. In general, it is better to repair a durotomy when it is noted rather than later in the case, as loss of the turgidity of the intact dural sac with its enclosed cerebrospinal fluid will result in excessive bleeding from loss of the tamponade effect of the full dural sac on the epidural vessels. Most durotomies can be repaired by direct suture of the defect. The author prefers a running #6-0 or #5-0 silk suture if possible. The use of end sutures, in which each end of the durotomy is sutured with a separate suture to allow gentle retraction and elevation by a surgical assistant, facilitates closure by elevating and profiling the defect. This technique also separates the edges of the dura from the underlying nerve roots or spinal cord, thereby reducing the likelihood of inadvertent incarceration of the underlying neural structures. The dural repair can then be augmented with a fibrin glue sealant if necessary. If direct suturing is not possible because of the location of the tear, a piece of fascia, a collagen matrix patch, or fibrin sealant may be used.

Distraction laminoplasty is a technique that has been described as an alternative to standard laminectomy. Distraction between two adjacent spinous processes with a laminar spreader allows visualization and access to a stenotic canal and requires only minimal dorsal bone resection. Limited bone is removed from the inferior spinous process and lamina of the cephalad vertebra and the superior aspect of the caudal vertebra. Ligamentum flavum can be removed, and the lateral recess can be decompressed by performing a limited partial medial facetectomy.

Lumbar laminoplasty, in a manner analogous to that performed in the cervical spine, has been described.1 Although rarely performed, it may have a role in the skeletally immature patient with central stenosis, as described previously.2 The lamina of the stenotic segment may be hinged and opened on the opposite side, using a small plate to keep the hinged side open, or the lamina can be removed and reapplied by using miniplates and screws bilaterally (see Fig. 53-5).

The amount of bone and ligament removal required for unilateral neural compression from disc herniation or focal, unilateral stenosis is dictated by the extent of concomitant pathology and the ease with which the primary compressing pathology can be accessed. Usually, decompression is required only to the proximal origin (insertion) of the ligamentum flavum (Fig. 53-8).