Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation

Published on 27/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurosurgery

Last modified 27/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3337 times

Chapter 80 Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation

Lumbar discectomy represents the most commonly performed spinal surgical procedure.1 Approximately 300,000 lumbar discectomy procedures are performed each year in the United States.2 In general, the clinical outcome for this procedure is favorable, with 80% to 90% of patients undergoing surgery reporting good or excellent results.36

Despite these favorable results, a relatively small number of patients who have had an initial good outcome following surgery will redevelop symptoms similar to those of their preoperative state owing to a recurrence of herniated disc material at the previous surgical site. The reported incidence of these recurrent lumbar disc herniations ranges from 5% to 15%.711

The patient with a symptomatic recurrent disc herniation typically undergoes several weeks or months of conservative management. This treatment may be followed by surgical reexploration in those individuals whose symptoms remain unresponsive. Surgery may involve simply removing the reherniated disc material or a fusion and fixation across the affected disc space. Regardless of the management approach, a recurrent disc herniation creates a substantial economic impact.12 This impact is compounded by time lost from work and the need for many of these patients to be retrained for lighter-duty positions.

Risk Factors for Recurrent Disc Herniations

The risk factors for a primary disc herniation have been noted to include exposure to repetitive lifting, exposure to vibrations, smoking, and a constitutional weakness of the anular tissue.1315 Isolated trauma or injury has not been found to be a consistent risk factor, occurring in only 0.2% to 10.7% of adults with a herniation.14,16 Conversely, Cinotti et al. found that 42% of patients with a recurrent disc herniation related the onset of radicular pain to an isolated injury or precipitating event.17 Similarly, Suk et al. reported the rate of an isolated injury as a cause of recurrence in 32.1%. This study also noted that 71.4% of the patients with recurrence were males and 57.1% were smokers.18

Despite these findings, other studies have found that gender, age, smoking status, level of herniation, and duration of symptoms were generally not associated with higher rates of recurrence.8,9,1719 Additionally, the degree of anular incision and the extent of the discectomy (partial or complete) have not been found to affect the potential for recurrence. 9,1719

One factor that potentially increases the likelihood of a recurrent disc herniation is diabetes. In general, patients with diabetes have been noted to have lower clinical success rates following the initial lumbar discectomy than do nondiabetic patients. Simpson et al. reported an excellent to good outcome following the initial discectomy of 95% in nondiabetic patients but only 39% in diabetic patients.20 Mobbs et al. reported success rates of 86% in nondiabetic patients and 60% in diabetic patients.9 Although these clinical outcome differences were generally felt to be attributable to lower quality-of-life indicators in diabetic patients, Robinson et al. investigated the differences in the proteoglycan profile of the discs in the two groups. This study found that diabetic patients had fewer proteoglycans in the disc material, potentially increasing their susceptibility to recurrent disc prolapse.21

Another proposed risk factor is the configuration of the initial disc herniation. Suk et al. and Grane et al. noted that preoperative disc configuration does not affect the rate of recurrence.18,22 Alternatively, Carragee et al. prospectively evaluated herniated disc configurations along with the rate of reherniation and the rate of reoperation. Disc herniations were divided into four shaped-based groups: (1) fragment-fissure herniations (disc fragment and small anular defect), (2) fragment-defect herniations (large disc fragment with massive dorsal anular tear), (3) fragment-contained discs (incomplete anular tear), and (4) absence of fragment-contained herniations (anular prolapse). Of the four groups, the fragment-fissure type herniations (group 1) were associated with the best outcomes and the lowest rate of reherniation (1%) and required the fewest reoperative procedures (1%). Those with anular prolapse (group 4) were associated with poorer clinical outcomes, with 38% of patients experiencing recurrent or persistent symptoms.8

Evaluation of Recurrent Disc Herniation

The patient who presents with a recurrent disc herniation has generally had a period of clinical improvement following the initial discectomy procedure. A retrospective review of 28 patients with recurrent disc herniation found a pain-free interval ranging from 7 to 168 months (mean of 60.8 months).18 Patients typically report radicular signs and symptoms similar or identical to those of their preoperative clinical state.

Pathologic changes in the ventral epidural space may reflect mass effect due to perineural scarring or recurrent disc herniation.7,23 Scarring is most pronounced before 9 months and primarily involves the anulus fibrosus.24 The scar may surround the nerve roots and cause symptoms by means of neural tension, decreased axoplasmic transport, restriction of blood flow, or restriction of venous return.7

MRI, with and without gadolinium contrast, is the preferred imaging modality for the assessment of a recurrent disc herniation.7,10,25,26 The use of contrast material helps to differentiate normal postoperative anatomic changes from a recurrent herniation. Peridural scarring will typically enhance heterogeneously because of its vascular supply. A recurrent disc herniation usually appears as a polypoid mass with a low signal on T1- and T2-weighted sequences. It is usually contiguous with the parent disc unless sequestered. There can be a hypointense rim of the posterior longitudinal ligament and outer anular fibers that outline the herniation. This rim will enhance with contrast administration (Fig. 80-1). The disc itself will not enhance, because it has no blood supply.7,27

Buy Membership for Neurosurgery Category to continue reading. Learn more here