Ischemic Heart Disease

Published on 13/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2391 times

Chapter 7 Ischemic Heart Disease

ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE

Chest Radiograph

The initial plain chest film in patients undergoing acute myocardial infarction is obtained to search for signs of left ventricular failure and to screen for some of the complications of infarction. Nearly half the patients admitted to a coronary care unit have radiologic signs of pulmonary venous hypertension within the first 24 hours after an acute myocardial infarction. Even though many films are taken with portable technique in the supine position, the signs of pulmonary edema have a rather good correlation with the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. The usual caveat, that low lung volumes can mimic signs of pulmonary edema, is appropriate. Indistinct hilar structures represent early engorgement of the vasculature and dilatation of the rich mediastinal lymphatics. You will occasionally see dilatation of upper lobe vessels even on supine films before the reticular pattern of interstitial edema develops. The width of the vascular pedicle above and adjacent to the aortic arch is frequently a good indicator of the intravascular volume. Increase in the size of the azygos vein and superior vena cava on serial films suggest an increase in intravascular blood volume and the need for treatment of left ventricular failure.

Aneurysms and Ruptures

In addition to chronic left ventricular failure, left ventricular enlargement may also be the result of a true or false aneurysm, chronic mitral regurgitation, or rarely cardiac rupture. Heart enlargement is not a feature of acute mitral regurgitation or rupture of the interventricular septum because the left ventricle needs several hours to several days to dilate enough to be visible on the chest film. The most frequent site of a true left ventricular aneurysm is in the anterolateral and apical wall. Although left ventricular aneurysms may involve any wall segment, aneurysms in the posterolateral wall are frequently false aneurysms. A false left ventricular aneurysm exists when the left ventricle ruptures into a site of previous pericardial adhesions so that the rupture is contained by the pericardium. An increase in size of the left ventricular aneurysm on serial studies is suggestive of a false aneurysm and warrants urgent, definitive evaluation. Calcification of the anterolateral and apical region of the left ventricle usually takes several years after the myocardial infarction that produced the scarring (Fig. 7-2).

Both papillary muscle rupture and rupture of the interventricular septum produce nearly identical findings on the chest radiograph. Both complications typically have moderate interstitial pulmonary edema with mild enlargement of the pulmonary arteries. There is a mild increase in heart size with signs of enlargement of all four cardiac chambers.

Coronary Angiography

Uses and Analysis

Progression of Atherosclerosis

Coronary atherosclerosis begins as lipid deposition in the arterial wall, which appears grossly as a raised, fatty streak. As the lesion progresses, a fibrous cap develops over the endothelial lipid deposit. Disruption of an atherosclerotic plaque results in fissuring and intraluminal thrombosis (Fig. 7-4). The thrombus may lead to intermittent vessel occlusion and unstable angina. Large ulcers at the site of the plaque can cause formation of a fixed thrombus and a chronic occlusion resulting in acute myocardial infarction. Severe stenoses tend to progress to total occlusion about three times more frequently than less severe lesions.

In patients with unstable angina, most coronary stenoses are only of moderate degree. It is the mild to moderate coronary stenosis that commonly precedes most coronary occlusions in patients with unstable angina. Angiography during acute myocardial infarction usually shows a thrombus in the infarct-related artery. After thrombolysis, many of these patients have an underlying lesion with less than 70% stenosis. Those stenoses that later progress usually have eccentric shapes with overhanging edges and are thought to represent plaque disruption. Therefore, the state of the atherosclerotic plaque—whether it is covered with a fibrin cap or has deep fissures that may lead to thrombus—is an important angiographic observation.

Current imaging techniques for ischemic heart disease are used increasingly to differentiate viable from nonviable myocardium in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Acute coronary occlusion generally results in reduced regional myocardial contraction. An acute reduction of blood flow of 80% below a control value in a coronary artery causes akinesis in that segment of the left ventricle, whereas a 95% reduction causes dyskinesis. Akinesis of a segment of the left ventricle, however, does not reliably distinguish viable myocardium from scar.

Myocardial stunning is a segmental wall motion abnormality that returns to its normal contractile state after reversal of a brief episode of severe ischemia.

Myocardial hibernation is a related state in which left ventricular wall motion abnormalities from chronic ischemia return to normal after relief of the ischemia by angioplasty or grafting. The myocardium remains viable during chronic ischemia even though the wall motion is decreased.

These two conditions of reversible left ventricular dysfunction are important to recognize because vigorous treatment of the thrombus or spasm in myocardial stunning and relief of the obstruction in myocardial hibernation may reverse the impaired ventricular performance and potentially salvage the jeopardized myocardium. Stress echocardiography is the modality of choice to assess left ventricular wall motion abnormalities. Stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) has demonstrated better sensitivity and specificity, but is less available. Furthermore, CMRI is capable of providing useful information about left ventricular viability (Fig. 7-5).

Extent and Location of Stenoses

Common Lesion Sites

Most coronary stenoses occur in the proximal portion of both arteries. The distribution of lesions is rather uniform in the three major arteries. The distribution of coronary stenoses with greater than 50% stenosis is: right coronary artery, 37%; left circumflex artery, 28%; left anterior descending artery, 33%; and left main artery, 3%.

In the right coronary artery, most severe stenoses develop in its proximal half, although there are occasional severe plaques at the bifurcation of the posterior descending and posterior left ventricular arteries (Fig. 7-6). The right ventricular marginal branch frequently has a severe stenosis at its origin.

The left main coronary artery should not taper. It is usually narrowed either at its ostium or at the bifurcation of the left anterior descending and circumflex arteries. Occasionally, the entire main arterial segment may be uniformly narrowed but usually one of its ends is more severely involved. Detection of plaques in this segment is particularly important because severe lesions are associated with an increased mortality during cardiac catheterization (Fig. 7-7).

Left Main Equivalent Disease

Left main equivalent disease describes the combination of stenoses that would cause a decrease in blood supply similar to that caused by a single stenosis in the left main coronary artery. This concept is applied so that a stenosis at the origin of both the left anterior descending and left circumflex arteries is not a left main equivalent. Either of these stenoses may become more severe but may follow a separate time course. Occlusion of one of these would not result in as large an area of myocardium becoming ischemic as would a single event in the left main coronary artery.

An example of a left main equivalent lesion would be a severe left anterior descending artery stenosis when an occluded right coronary artery is supplied by collaterals from the left anterior descending artery. Here one lesion controls the blood supply to the bulk of the heart. A similar example would be a stenosis in a long left anterior descending artery that extends completely around the apex in place of the usual posterior descending artery. Here also a significant percentage of myocardium is affected by a single stenosis.

Clinically, loss of 40% of the left ventricular myocardium produces cardiogenic shock. A left main or left main equivalent coronary stenosis usually affects this much of the myocardium. If collateral vessels supply an adequate perfusion to an occluded vessel, other combinations of coronary stenoses may produce a situation in which one lesion controls the blood supply to a major portion of the left ventricle.

In the left anterior descending artery, stenoses before or after the first large septal branch may have different clinical implications. Patients with chronic stable angina who have a severe stenosis before the first septal branch have a statistically higher mortality when compared with patients who have a stenosis distal to this branch (Fig. 7-8). The first septal branch can supply nearly half of the interventricular septum and a contractile portion of the ventricle and is closely related to the conduction system. A stenosis before the first septal branch also frequently involves a large diagonal branch that supplies a portion of the lateral wall. This correlation does not hold in unstable angina pectoris, where there is no association between severe plaques before and after the first septal branch.

Morphology of Coronary Atherosclerosis

Relationship to Coronary Syndrome

Both clinical and angiographic studies have confirmed that angiographic morphology is correlated with unstable coronary syndromes. Simple plaques with a smooth fibrous covering, smooth borders, and an hourglass configuration are associated with stable angina. Complex lesions with plaque rupture, intraplaque hemorrhage, and irregular borders in eccentric stenoses are associated with unstable angina and myocardial infarction (Fig. 7-10).

Other Causes of Stenosis

There are many causes of coronary stenosis other than atherosclerosis. Frequently, the cause can only be determined by clinical correlation with a systemic disease (Box 7-2). Even then, in the adult age range, it is often impossible to exclude coexisting atherosclerosis. The clinical constellation of chest pain, a positive exercise test, and a normal coronary arteriogram is referred to as syndrome X. The cause of the syndrome is unknown, is not related to large vessel spasm, and may be related to abnormalities in precapillary vessels that are too small to be seen with coronary angiography. In contrast, myocardial infarction can occur with a normal coronary arteriogram. This event is rare and has been caused by thrombosis with recanalization, coronary spasm, cocaine abuse, viral myocarditis, chest trauma, and carbon monoxide intoxication.

Interpretation of Arterial Stenoses on Angiography

Determining Severity

What degree of arterial narrowing constitutes a severe stenosis? Many studies have correlated the degree of stenosis with the ultimate clinical or pathologic outcome. Severe stenoses correlate well with an impairment in the left ventriculogram. Early clinical studies by Likoff and Proudfit demonstrated a good association between arteriographic evidence of one-, two-, and three-vessel disease with the clinical signs and symptoms of ischemic heart disease. Comparison of arteriograms with postmortem examinations demonstrates a rough correlation with a 50% arterial reduction or 75% area reduction in a coronary artery associated with a transmural myocardial infarct. Because it is easier to measure the greatest percentage diameter reduction in a coronary artery from serial views, the diameter and not the area reduction is measured. The severity of the obstructive disease is assessed in each coronary artery segment by comparing the arterial diameter at a point of maximum lumen reduction with a proximal or distal “normal-appearing” artery. A coronary stenosis is graded as the highest percentage of stenosis seen in all projections.

Because atherosclerotic plaques tend to be eccentric, coronary angiography must be performed in two orthogonal projections so the maximal arterial narrowing can be identified (Fig. 7-12). This system has many limitations. The normal-appearing artery may itself be diffusely diseased. A similar percentage of stenosis in a smaller distal artery is ascribed the same physiologic consequence, even though flow through a larger proximal arterial segment must be quite different. In a large artery with a greater cross-sectional area, the amount of myocardium supplied by its coronary flow is proportionate to the smaller area supplied by a distal coronary artery. A similar degree of narrowing of a small distal coronary artery produces the same profusion deficit as does the same percentage of stenosis in a large or proximal artery. The length of a coronary stenosis is important but is difficult to subjectively evaluate as to severity of a lesion reducing distal flow. Given these limitations, a 50% or greater stenosis in a patient with ischemic heart disease is defined as a significant stenosis.

Determinants of Coronary Blood Flow

Normal Flow

Coronary blood flow in humans is about 70 to 80 ml per minute per 100 g of myocardium for a cardiac output of 5 L/min. This flow can increase by a factor of three or four during vigorous exercise. The hydraulic factors that influence blood flow through a vessel are expressed in Poiseuille’s equation

image

where Q. is flow per unit time, r is radius, P is pressure, L is length, and μ is viscosity. This equation is strictly valued for nonpulsatile, streamline flow and a uniform viscosity. With some allowance for the transfer of this mathematical principle to a biologic system, the equation helps explain some of the determinants of coronary flow. Under normal conditions, all the variables in the equation are constant except for the radius of the vessel. However, a number of factors act on the major site of vascular resistance: the precapillary arteriole.

Transient Variations

The coronary system autoregulates its blood flow for transient variations in perfusion pressure. Abrupt increases in perfusion pressure (aortic pressure minus right atrial pressure) result in an equivalent increase in coronary blood flow, which gradually returns toward the initial value as vascular resistance changes. A similar response occurs when there is a quick decrease in perfusion pressure.

The blood flow through both left and right coronary arteries is influenced by the extravascular resistance supplied by the thick-walled left ventricle. In the left coronary artery, most blood flow is in diastole. In left ventricular hypertrophy, left coronary flow may even reverse. In contrast, right coronary blood flow is more constant and occurs quite equally during systole and during diastole. In diseases that increase left ventricular wall tension, resting coronary flow tends to be more phasic. Because left coronary flow occurs mainly during diastole, changes in heart rate can lead to critical alterations in myocardial blood supply. In tachycardia, the diastolic filling period is shortened, so blood flow occurs during a shorter time period. Enhancement of left ventricular contraction, as occurs with aortic stenosis or with sympathetic stimulation, similarly increases the time of the heart in systole and thereby reduces left coronary flow. The opposite effect would occur in a patient on propranolol in whom there is bradycardia and decreased afterload.

Resting coronary blood flow in a normal vascular bed does not decrease until the diameter of the stenosis is at least 80% of the adjacent normal vessel. As a stenosis is gradually increased, the distal vascular bed—mainly at the level of the precapillary arteriole—begins to dilate and thus reduces the vascular resistance. However, if the vasculature is already maximally dilated so that autoregulation is no longer present, coronary flow begins to decrease with a stenosis of 30% to 50%. This effect can be seen after pretreatment with a vasodilator but is also thought to occur in the presence of atherosclerosis. In this latter instance, the precapillary sphincters of the distal vascular bed may theoretically dilate slowly from the growth of proximal stenoses.

Flow Reserve

Coronary flow reserve is the maximal flow divided by the resting flow. The “50% significant stenosis” is then a rough approximation to this physiologic model. The maximal flow is that which occurs when the coronary vascular bed has undergone maximal vasodilatation. Fig. 7-13 shows the relation between coronary blood flow and a focal stenosis in an artery at rest and after maximal vasodilatation.

If a significant stenosis is defined as that which causes coronary blood flow to decrease, a significant stenosis at rest is roughly 80% reduction in diameter. However, after maximal vasodilatation, a significant stenosis changes to 40%. The interpretation of these results indicates that stenoses greater than 80% cause a reduction in flow under all circumstances, whereas stenoses less than 40% are not significant even under conditions in which there is maximal vasodilatation. The border zone between 40% and 80% represents the limitation of this method. Unfortunately for clinical decision making, most stenoses fall in this middle zone.

Angiographic Appearance

The angiographic appearance of an epicardial collateral is usually a serpentine, corkscrew artery that goes from the end of an adjacent artery to the end of the occluded artery. Collaterals through the interventricular septum appear differently: They are straight and connect the septal branches from the anterior descending to the posterior descending artery (Fig. 7-15).

There are many pathways in the heart for collateral vessels. Intracoronary collaterals bridge an occluded artery from its proximal to its distal end (Fig. 7-16). This kind may be difficult to distinguish from a recanalized thrombus. Intercoronary collaterals develop between the terminal branches of different arteries (Fig. 7-17). Frequent collateral pathways are from the conus artery of the right coronary artery to the left anterior descending artery (Vieussens’ ring). Kugel’s artery is a collateral that connects the sinoatrial nodal artery to the atrioventricular nodal artery through the interatrial septum. Because the sinoatrial nodal artery can come from either the right coronary or left circumflex artery, and the atrioventricular nodal artery can originate from either a right or left dominant posterior left ventricular artery, there are four pathways that collaterals can take through the atria that can be called Kugel’s artery (Fig. 7-18).

Collaterals are rarely visible angiographically in the first few days after myocardial infarction but may develop over the following 2 weeks. Several months after a myocardial infarction, most patients develop visible collaterals unless the infarct has organized into a dense scar.

Coronary Artery Spasm

Dynamic forms of coronary obstruction have been recognized for centuries as causing angina and myocardial infarction. In his original description of angina pectoris Heberden wrote in 1768 that chest pain occasionally occurs without exertion. In 1910, Osler speculated that spasm of a coronary artery could cause anginal pain. In 1959, Prinzmetal described an unusual syndrome of cardiac pain that occurs almost exclusively at rest, is not precipitated by exertion, and is associated with electrocardiographic ST-segment elevations. Myocardial perfusion scanning and coronary arteriography have shown that spasm may reduce or stop segmental myocardial blood flow.

Catheter-Induced versus Prinzmetal Syndrome

The distinction between catheter-induced spasm and that in Prinzmetal syndrome is difficult, but one caused by a catheter occurs proximally, adjacent to the catheter tip (Fig. 7-20). Catheter-induced spasm is usually seen at the origin of the right coronary artery as a short area with smooth fusiform narrowing. Focal spasm frequently occurs at the site of an atherosclerotic plaque, which may make it difficult to distinguish from fixed disease. Spasm may be slight or it may completely occlude the artery. Because the coronary endothelium has potent factors that can cause spasm and thrombus after intimal injury, spasm is frequently seen after percutaneous coronary angioplasty. In this situation, the artery has a sawtooth appearance, which is reversed with nitroglycerin.

Coronary Aneurysms

Coronary artery aneurysms are occasionally discovered during angiographic evaluation of ischemic heart disease and are usually a variant of coronary atherosclerosis (Fig. 7-21). This lesion will frequently be found in the same artery with stenoses and occlusions. Atherosclerosis can produce diffuse ectasia from degeneration of the media and associated elastic elements (Fig. 7-22). To distinguish an ectatic artery or poststenotic dilatation from an aneurysm, a useful definition of coronary aneurysm is a dilatation of 50% greater than the preceding normal artery. Most atherosclerotic coronary aneurysms have an adjacent severe stenosis. The saccular aneurysm may overlap and hide the stenosis during angiography so that at least one angiographic projection should profile the neck of the aneurysm.

Causes

Coronary aneurysms are a major manifestation of many systemic diseases. The history of associated cardiac lesions may implicate syphilis, polyarteritis nodosa, trauma, bacterial infections, neoplasm, and a congenital etiology. Rupture of an atherosclerotic aneurysm is rare. Rupture is associated with bacteria-infected aneurysm, congenital aneurysm of large size, and arteritis diseases. Diffuse aneurysms have been seen in transplanted hearts that underwent immunologic rejection.

Kawasaki disease is a childhood acute multisystem vasculitis that includes cervical lymphadenopathy, fever, and a rash in the mouth and on the hands and feet. Also called mucocutaneous lymph node syndrome, Kawasaki disease involves a myocarditis and pericarditis that may cause congestive heart failure. Aneurysms of the coronary arteries are frequent (Fig. 7-23) and may cause coronary thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and sudden death. About half of the children with coronary aneurysms have angiographically normal-appearing arteries 2 years later. Some aneurysms may be quite large, and rupture is a fatal complication. See Table 7-1 for prognosis of aneurysms in Kawasaki disease.

TABLE 7-1 Prognosis of aneurysms in Kawasaki disease

Size Prognosis
<4 mm Regress to normal size
4-8 mm Tend to become smaller
>8 mm Progress to obstruction or stenosis

Myocardial Bridging

An intramyocardial bridge is a coronary artery that dips into the myocardium and is completely surrounded by cardiac muscle (Fig. 7-24). This segment of the coronary artery narrows dynamically during systole and returns to its baseline size during diastole. Bridges are seen in about 0.5% to 7.5% of angiographic studies, usually in the left anterior descending artery, although diagonal and marginal arteries may be affected. The bridges may be as deep as 10 mm and usually are 10 to 30 mm long. The bridge segment rarely has atherosclerosis, but plaques are seen both proximately and distally. Because narrowing takes place during systole and most coronary flow occurs in diastole, mural coronary arteries were initially considered a minor anomaly. However, chest pain and myocardial infarction may occur when the bridge narrows more than 75% in systole. Because the bridge is usually eccentric, views in at least two orthogonal projections should be obtained.

The septal arteries, which are also intramural, normally show no change in size between systole and diastole. Septal arteries from the left anterior descending artery may occlude during systole in diseases that increase left ventricular wall tension, such as aortic stenosis, hypertensive heart disease, and idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis.

CONGENITAL ANOMALIES OF THE CORONARY ARTERIES

Coronary anomalies can be defined morphologically or hemodynamically. Morphologic variations can arise in the origin, course, or termination of the coronary arteries. These variations may be isolated anomalies or be related to certain forms of congenital heart disease. Coronary anomalies may cause cardiac ischemia. In this group are four major anomalies:

The morphologic classification is used in this discussion.

Anomalies of Origin

Although the usual origin of the left and right coronary arteries is the left and right sinuses of Valsalva, respectively, ectopic coronary arteries can arise above the sinuses in the ascending aorta, within the posterior (noncoronary) sinus, low within the sinus adjacent to the leaflet, within the commissure, or in a subvalvular location. The conus artery frequently originates as a separate ostium in the right sinus of Valsalva. There may be no left main artery if the left anterior descending and circumflex arteries arise separately from the left sinus of Valsalva. A common anomaly is the left circumflex artery arising from the right sinus of Valsalva and passing behind the aorta into the left atrioventricular groove (Fig. 7-27). When the left coronary artery originates from the right sinus of Valsalva, it may:

Similarly, when the right coronary artery originates from the left sinus of Valsalva by passing between the aorta and the right ventricular infundibulum, it forms an acute angle at its ostium and may be compressed by the two great vessels. If the anomalous right coronary, originating from the left sinus of Valsalva, courses anteriorly to the aorta, it should not produce any symptom, unless it is diseased (Fig. 7-29). Rarely a left coronary artery arises from the right sinus of Valsalva, assumes an intramyocardial course by traversing through the crista supraventricularis, then continues as the left anterior descending and circumflex arteries in their usual locations.

The coronary arteries may have ectopic origins from structures other than the aorta. In this situation, the anomalies include:

The most common of these is the left coronary origin from the pulmonary artery. This entity, the Bland-White-Garland syndrome, is seen in infants who have a myocardial infarction in the first few months of life. Coronary arteriography shows an empty left sinus of Valsalva. The right coronary artery supplies collaterals to the left coronary artery, which fills in a retrograde direction to opacify the pulmonary arteries (Fig. 7-30). The infantile left ventricle may have a segmental wall motion abnormality like that seen in coronary disease in the adult. Left ventricular aneurysms and mitral regurgitation can produce congestive heart failure. Left ventricular aneurysms may completely regress after corrective coronary surgery.

Anomalies of Origin and Course

Major coronary anomalies of location are those that go behind the aorta, between the aorta and the pulmonary artery, or anterior to the right ventricular infundibulum (Fig. 7-31). The anomaly that can cause angina and sudden death is the aberrant coronary artery that goes between the aorta and the pulmonary artery. These two great arteries expand during systole and may compress the aberrant coronary artery and constrict its flow. This type of anomaly usually has a stenosis at its origin because of an acute angle with the sinus of Valsalva. A prime example of this group is the isolated single coronary artery, which can originate from either the left or right sinus of Valsalva (Fig. 7-32).

The most common anomaly is origin of the left circumflex artery from the right coronary artery with a course that goes behind the aorta before supplying the usual circumflex territory. You can usually see this retroaortic course on a right anterior oblique left ventriculogram, and it will alert you to the anomaly. Other common variations include the left anterior descending artery coming from the conus artery and the posterior descending artery continuing around the apex as a long left anterior descending artery (Fig. 7-33).

Noninvasive imaging modalities, such as gadolinium magnetic resonance angiography and electrocardiogram-gated (ECG-gated) 64-detector computed tomography (CT), represent efficient imaging techniques for demonstrating coronary anomalies. They can provide pertinent information on the shape of the vessel orifice and course of the anomalous vessel, such as its relationship with the great vessels, especially before surgery or eventually coronary intervention.

Anomalies of Termination

Coronary artery fistula is a rare congenital anomaly but is significant in the differential diagnosis of a continuous murmur. A coronary fistula may occur to any adjacent vascular bed. Fistulas may connect to all four cardiac chambers, the coronary sinus, the right or left superior vena cava, the pulmonary artery, and the systemic arteries (Fig. 7-34). In aortic atresia and pulmonary atresia, there are frequently large coronary artery sinuses and fistulas to the ventricles.

Complications

As in other parts of the body, fistulas can be the site of bacterial arteritis, ischemia to distal tissues, and rupture. Complications in the heart are congestive heart failure, infective endocarditis, myocardial infarction, and fistula rupture.

These fistulas are best studied with selective coronary arteriography. Congenital coronary arteriovenous fistulas have a large tortuous artery and vein down to the point of termination (Fig. 7-35). In contrast, acquired fistulas from either trauma or endocarditis have a normal or slightly dilated artery proximal to the fistula. The arterial bed distal to the fistula may be hypoperfused (a vascular steal), and if long-standing, may have collaterals supplying this lesion. Acute traumatic fistulas initially have normal-sized arteries and veins, but if they are uncorrected both these vessels will dilate. If a fistula opens into the right heart, a left-to-right shunt is present.

CORONARY BYPASS GRAFTING

Aortocoronary grafts are constructed from either the internal mammary arteries or saphenous veins reversed so that the valves do not impede flow. The radial artery is now commonly utilized. Rarely, the gastroepiploic artery is brought through the diaphragm as a graft.

Saphenous Vein Grafts

Saphenous vein grafts have a proximal anastomosis to the ascending aorta several centimeters above the aortic valve. Vein grafts may be constructed so that one or more side-to-side anastomoses are connected with diagonal and marginal arteries that lie in proximity. A side limb can be placed to a saphenous vein graft so that several coronary arteries at a distance from one another may be supplied by a single proximal graft (Fig. 7-37). This type of graft resembles an inverted Y.

Complications

Complications in venous grafts are usually at the proximal aortic anastomosis or the distal coronary anastomosis. Graft complications in coronary surgery are the same as complications to grafts elsewhere. Occlusion and focal or diffuse stenosis are common (Fig. 7-38), whereas pseudoaneurysm at either anastomosis is unusual. Over time, saphenous grafts develop a diffuse stenosis from intimal hyperplasia (Fig. 7-39). Degenerated venous grafts can look like severe atherosclerosis with ragged ulcerated plaques. Unlike coronary artery stenoses, which can be graded by a percentage reduction in diameter, this method is not accurate when applied to a stenosis in a vein graft because vein grafts are larger than the supplied coronary artery. In a graft four times the size of the native artery a stenosis must have an 80% diameter before it reduces distal flow, but in a graft of the same size as the coronary artery, distal flow would be reduced by about 50% at rest. Because of these difficulties, a thallium exercise test is required to assess the severity of a graft stenosis.

Imaging Techniques

Bypass grafts can be visualized by angiography, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Angiography of bypass grafts is performed by selective injection in the internal mammary artery or in the aortic anastomosis of the vein graft. The flow into the native coronary artery from a graft should occur in both antegrade and retrograde directions (Fig. 7-40). If there is no flow into the proximal coronary artery from the graft, that artery is usually occluded. Injection into a coronary artery that has a distal graft may show an apparent occlusion in the “watershed” region between the proximal coronary artery and graft insertion. When the coronary artery is stenotic and not occluded before the graft, the graft will fill in a retrograde direction. These complex flow patterns in the graft and the adjacent coronary arteries depend on how much pressure is applied by the angiographer when injecting the graft or artery, and the hemodynamic variables in the arterial system. Collaterals to a grafted artery are not seen when the graft is functioning. Collateral vessels that were present before surgery, unless quite large, no longer are visualized, presumably because the collaterals have involuted or because the graft reduces the pressure gradient between the ends of the collateral channels, thereby slowing flow to the collateral.

LEFT VENTRICULAR ABNORMALITIES IN CORONARY DISEASE

The evaluation of segmental and global left ventricular function is a standard part of the imaging evaluation for ischemic heart disease. Ventricular wall motion can be analyzed on tomographic methods such as echocardiography or cine magnetic resonance (Fig. 7-41). Because the angiographic left ventriculogram is a projectional and not a tomographic image, only those wall segments that are tangential to the x-ray beam can be evaluated (Fig. 7-42). Biplanar, rather than single-plane, left ventriculograms generally give a more accurate evaluation of segmental wall motion and a better estimate of the ejection fraction.

Ventriculogram Analysis

The ventriculogram is a classic example of “information overload.” It images many structures that are usually moving in different directions at different velocities. Even among experienced observers, one person’s dyskinetic wall motion may be another’s normal motion. Therefore, it is useful to develop a schema for interpreting the ventriculogram by isolating the components and separately judging their shape and motion. The basis for analyzing the left ventriculogram follows.

Aorta

Mitral valve

Left ventricular wall

SEGMENTAL WALL MOTION ABNORMALITIES WITH AND WITHOUT CORONARY DISEASE

Left Ventricular Thrombus

Mural thrombi of the left ventricle occur in the area adjacent to healed myocardial infarcts without aneurysm, in segmental wall aneurysms, and with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy with poor wall motion. Left ventricular thrombi do not occur if the wall is contracting normally. The thrombi are usually at the apex, although they may be elsewhere, particularly along the inferior wall and, occasionally, within a false aneurysm.

Approximately half of all patients with postinfarction ventricular aneurysm have left ventricular thrombi that are seen at surgery or on necropsy study; however, the angiographic detection of these thrombi is only moderately sensitive and specific. Simpson and colleagues found that roughly 74% of mural thrombi found at surgery are not detected by angiography and in 10% of patients diagnosed as having thrombi no thrombi are present at operation. Even during echocardiography of the left ventricle, it can be difficult to diagnose mural thrombi. Gadolinium magnetic resonance angiography or ECG-gated multirow detector CT can precisely characterize or delineate the thrombus (Fig. 7-43). Furthermore, echocardiography and noninvasive imaging techniques do not have the risk of dislodging mural thrombi when compared to angiography.

Calcifications

Left ventricular thrombi may be calcified, particularly when there is calcification of adjacent structures, such as an aneurysm or infarcted papillary muscle. Filling defects that are typical of thrombus may have several appearances (Fig. 7-44). A polypoid shape usually arises in an akinetic apex. This angiographic configuration is a harbinger of systemic embolization. A truncated apex with an adjacent shaggy wall may also indicate thrombus formation. Because the wall of an aneurysm is thin, the presence of a normal or thick wall to the aneurysm indicates a thrombus within the aneurysm.

Left Ventricular True and False Aneurysm

Definition and Pathologic Correlation

Left ventricular aneurysms appear to develop early in the course of myocardial infarction. In more than 50% of patients who develop an aneurysm, it will be present within 24 to 48 hours of the onset of infarction and frequently will still be present 3 months later. In the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS), roughly 8% of patients with coronary artery disease had well-defined left ventricular aneurysms. Although aneurysms can develop with single-artery disease, most left ventricular aneurysms have multivessel coronary disease with severe obstructions. Patients with an anterior aneurysm usually have a greater than 90% stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery.

A left ventricular aneurysm (Box 7-4) is a segment of a left ventricular wall that protrudes from the expected diastolic outline of the ventricular chamber. The wall motion may be either akinetic or dyskinetic. The wall of the aneurysm is generally smooth without the usual trabecular pattern. This definition of a left ventricular aneurysm overlaps with several features of reversible ischemia. During an acute myocardial infarction, the wall segment involved has a dyskinetic motion, which may return to normal if a transmural infarction does not occur.

When the wall thins, a large myocardial scar may develop the appearance of an aneurysm. On imaging studies, a large scar or a small aneurysm may have the same appearance. A functional aneurysm has a normal diastolic contour but a dyskinetic systolic bulge in the region of a large acontractile segment and may contain either reversible ischemic myocardium or scar. In contrast, an anatomic aneurysm has an abnormal protrusion during both systole and diastole because the wall is entirely a scar that has stretched (Fig. 7-45).

Imaging Signs of Aneurysm

Anatomic aneurysms that have been present for more than several months may have a thin rim of calcium outlining their extent. This type of aneurysm may be either akinetic or dyskinetic. The wall of a true aneurysm is quite thin, reflecting the fact that the scar extends from the endocardium through to the pericardium (Fig. 7-46). The aneurysmal segment has a large neck, comparable in size to its internal circumference. Within the aneurysm, the wall is usually smooth unless a thrombus is present. The boundaries of the aneurysm are usually discrete and easily discernible.

The chest film is not a sensitive test to screen for left ventricular aneurysm. Only one third of angiographically diagnosed aneurysms show contour abnormalities on the chest film. Part of the explanation for this discrepancy is that the septum is not visible on the chest film and small aneurysms at the apex are obscured by the fat pad. The left ventricle is usually dilated and the remaining wall is hyperkinetic to maintain cardiac output. The uninvolved ventricular wall is frequently hypertrophied, which probably reflects the fact that about half of patients with aneurysms also have systemic hypertension. Most true aneurysms are in the anterolateral and apical walls (Fig. 7-47), although the inferior and posterolateral walls occasionally have isolated aneurysms. Echocardiography depicts left ventricular aneurysm quite well and should be the first modality of choice.

False Aneurysm

When the pericardium rather than myocardium composes the wall of the aneurysm, it is a false aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm. The usual cause is a rupture of the left ventricle into the pericardial space after myocardial infarction. Because of adhesions from previous pericarditis, the pericardium attaches locally to the epicardium. This opportunely prevents the ventricular blood from extending into the remaining pericardial space and causing tamponade. Causes that are less common but have a nearly identical appearance include abscess from bacterial endocarditis, surgical ventriculotomy (Fig. 7-48), and penetrating trauma. In contrast to true aneurysms, most false aneurysms resulting from myocardial infarct are on the posterolateral and diaphragmatic sides of the left ventricle (Fig. 7-49).

The left ventriculogram demonstrates a discrete saccular aneurysm whose neck is considerably smaller than the internal circumference of the saccule. Contrast material may not flow into the false aneurysm until late in systole, and it may oscillate into and out of the neck of the aneurysm without exiting from the left ventricle. Because of the narrow communication with the left ventricular chamber, the opacification of the false aneurysm may persist for many seconds after the injection has ended (Fig. 7-50). Frequently the false aneurysm is bigger than the left ventricle, and in fact, may enlarge over serial examinations. This has prognostic significance in that false aneurysms have a high propensity to rupture. Rupture of a true aneurysm is rare, occurring in less than 4% of several necropsy series. In contrast, postmortem series indicate that approximately 45% of false aneurysms rupture. Echocardiography is also the first modality of choice when a false aneurysm is suspected.

The coronary arteries in patients with false aneurysms are also severely diseased. However, reflecting the posterior and diaphragmatic location of most false aneurysms, there is frequent occlusion of the right coronary artery, whereas, with true aneurysm, occlusion is more common in the left coronary artery.

Cardiac false aneurysm (or changes that look like aneurysms) may result from diseases other than coronary artery disease. Congenital diverticula of the left ventricle may be confused with false aneurysm but they usually are smaller and occur at the apex. The African cardiomyopathies that have apical aneurysms usually can be distinguished by both their clinical course and the absence of coronary disease. The rare submitral aneurysms found in black Africans are not caused by ischemia. These aneurysms have a narrow neck originating between the mitral annulus and the posteromedial papillary muscle. The large sac lies beneath the left atrium and displaces it superiorly.

RUPTURE OF THE INTERVENTRICULAR SEPTUM

Clinical Presentation

Rupture of the interventricular septum is an uncommon complication of myocardial infarction that occurs in about 1% of those who sustain infarction. If not surgically treated, more than 90% of those with rupture die within 1 year. The appearance of a new systolic murmur within hours to weeks after myocardial infarction, particularly if associated with biventricular failure or cardiogenic shock, suggests ventricular septal defect or ruptured papillary muscle.

Common abnormalities in chest radiographs of patients with a ruptured septum are signs of interstitial or alveolar pulmonary edema and left ventricular enlargement (Table 7-2). Enlargement of other chambers is inconstant. Almost half will show pleural effusions, enlargement of the pulmonary arteries, and signs of pulmonary venous hypertension. Occasionally, an unusual configuration of the heart will suggest the presence of an aneurysm in addition to the septal rupture (Fig. 7-51).

TABLE 7-2 Chest radiographic abnormalities in rupture of the interventricular septum

Abnormality Percentage
PULMONARY
Normal 12
Pulmonary venous hypertension 9
Interstitial edema 42
Alveolar edema 37
PLEURAL EFFUSIONS
None 37
Right side 3
Left side 30
Both sides 30
Pulmonary artery enlargement 39
CARDIAC ENLARGEMENT
Left ventricle 82
Left atrium 7
Right ventricle 3
Right atrium 12

Modified with permission from Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Greene RE, et al.: Coronary, ventricular, and pulmonary abnormalities associated with rupture of the interventricular septum complicating myocardial infarction, Am J Roentgenol 131:571, 1978.

Left Ventricular Signs

Doppler echocardiography is a good noninvasive technique to demonstrate ventricular septal rupture. During left ventriculography, almost all patients have at least one segment with akinesis or dyskinesis. The posterolateral wall is hyperkinetic in some patients, suggesting that the exaggerated motion is partly compensating for the other segments of the ventricle. The septum is always akinetic or dyskinetic.

In the right anterior oblique view, you will see opacification of the pulmonary artery during left ventriculography. This view superimposes the two ventricles. The most inferior wall visible is the diaphragmatic wall of the right ventricle. If the left ventricular diaphragmatic wall is akinetic, the adjacent right ventricular wall behaves similarly. In the left anterior oblique projection, contrast material passes through the rupture to opacify the right ventricle (Fig. 7-52). The margins of the rupture may be difficult to identify, but they always are in a region of severe segmental wall motion abnormality. Occasionally, the right ventricular anterior wall will also be akinetic and represent an extension of the diaphragmatic infarct.

After myocardial infarction, ventricular septal defects occur in the muscular septum either posteriorly adjacent to the mitral valve or anteriorly near the apex. The margins of the rupture are irregular and the flow of contrast media in that region is slow. However, the site of rupture is always in a region of severe segmental wall motion abnormality. Anterolateral and apical akinesis uniformly correspond with an anterior rupture near the apex, whereas posterobasal and diaphragmatic akinesis occur with posterior rupture adjacent to the mitral annulus. The cranial left anterior oblique view elongates the septum and helps to distinguish apical from basal ruptures.

Left ventricular aneurysm, mitral regurgitation, or both are found in roughly three quarters of patients with septal rupture. These exaggerate extensive wall motion abnormalities. The aneurysm may be in the region of the septal rupture or in a separate portion of the ventricle. The mitral regurgitation is the result of a variety of factors, including left ventricular dilatation and papillary muscle dysfunction. Both these lesions contribute to poor left ventricular performance and make catheterization difficult. However, their recognition is essential for proper surgical management.

Extensive coronary artery stenoses are usually present with septal rupture. Severe two- and three-vessel disease is common with rupture of the interventricular septum, yet about 30% with rupture have a significant stenosis in only one coronary artery, either the right coronary or the left anterior descending artery. When only one coronary artery is involved, that portion of the artery distal to the occlusion is generally not visualized. This indicates that it is completely occluded or that bridging collateral vessels either have not formed or are not currently functioning. The absence of collaterals and the lack of visualization of the coronary artery distal to a proximal occlusion in a patient with septal rupture is presumably associated with a sizable area of muscle infarction that was present before the septum ruptured. On the other hand, in the absence of a septal rupture or aneurysm, the distal segment of an occluded coronary artery is almost always opacified through collateral vessels. It is possible that edema in the ischemic zone around the infarct compresses existing collateral vessels and that these small vessels might be visible when the edema regresses.

MITRAL REGURGITATION RESULTING FROM CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE

Pathologic Causes

The mechanism of mitral regurgitation in coronary artery disease is related to the impairment of the left ventricular wall containing the papillary muscles. This pathologic process has been labeled the papillary muscle dysfunction syndrome, although the papillary muscles and their blood supply are only a partial explanation. The arterioles supplying the papillary muscles are either end arteries or are at the termination of a long arterial path. The posteromedial papillary muscle is supplied by left circumflex marginal branches to the posterolateral wall or by branches of the distal right coronary artery; the anterolateral papillary muscle receives blood mainly from diagonal branches of the left anterior descending artery.

During systole, the papillary muscles contract and either initiate the action or assist in the support of the mitral apparatus to withstand systolic pressure. Clinically, under situations in which the papillary muscles are ischemic, the adjacent left ventricular wall is also ischemic. Congestive heart failure leading to left ventricular dilatation will change the orientation of the papillary muscles to the mitral leaflets but causes only a trace amount of regurgitation because the muscle around the mitral orifice contracts slightly during systole. Under these circumstances mitral regurgitation of mild to severe degree may result because of incomplete mitral leaflet closure.

The spectrum of papillary muscle disorders includes ischemic processes involving both the papillary muscle and its adjacent left ventricular free wall. For example, hypokinesis, akinesis, or aneurysm may produce any degree of mitral regurgitation (Fig. 7-53).

Complete rupture of a necrotic papillary muscle is quite rare, and because of its acute severity, usually causes the death of the patient. Recent surgical advances have made survival possible for some individuals if this lesion is recognized early. The more frequent clinical event is rupture of only one head of the papillary muscle, allowing the attached chordae to partially support both mitral leaflets and to limit somewhat the amount of regurgitation.

SUGGESTED READING

ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:2215-2238.

AHA Statistical Update. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2008. Circulation. 2008;117:e25-e147.

Ambrose JA, Winters SL, Arora RR, et al. Angiographic evolution of coronary artery morphology in unstable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;7:472-478.

Ambrose JA. Plaque disruption and the acute coronary syndromes of unstable angina and myocardial infarction: if the substrate is similar, why is the clinical presentation different? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1753-1758.

Attili AK, Cascade PN. CT and MRI of coronary artery disease: evidence-based review. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;187:S483-S499.

Bogaty P, Brecker SJ, White SE, et al. Compa rison of coronary angiographic findings in acute and chronic first presentation of ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 1993;87:1938-1947.

Bolli R. Myocardial “stunning” in man. Circulation. 1992;87:1771-1791.

Brown BG, Zhao ZQ, Sacco DE, et al. Lipid lowering and plaque regression. New insights into prevention of plaque disruption and clinical events in coronary disease. Circulation. 1993;87:1781-1791.

Cabins HS, Roberts WC. Left ventricular aneurysm, intra-aneurysmal thrombus and systemic embolus in coronary heart disease. Chest. 1980;77:587-590.

Cabins HS, Roberts WC. True left ventricular aneurysm and healed myocardial infarction. Clinical and necropsy observations including quantification of degrees of coronary arterial narrowing. Am J Cardiol. 1980;47:754-773.

Datta J, White CS, Gilkeson RC, et al. Anomalous coronary arteries in adults: depiction at multidetector row CT angiography. Radiology. 2005;235:812-818.

Davies MJ. A macro and micro view of coronary vascular insult in ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 1990;82(Suppl. 2):II-38-II-47.

Davies SW, Marchant B, Lyons JP, et al. Coronary lesion morphology in acute myocardial infarction: demonstration of early remodeling after streptokinase treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;17:1079-1087.

Dodd JD, Ferencik M, Liberthson RR, et al. Congenital anomalies of coronary artery origin in adults: 64-MDCT appearance. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:W138-W146.

Faxon DP, Ryan TJ, Davis KB, et al. Prognostic significance of angiographically documented left ventricular aneurysm from the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). Am J Cardiol. 1982;50:157-174.

Feldman RL, Nichols WW, Pepine CJ, et al. Hemodynamic significance of the length of a coronary arterial narrowing. Am J Cardiol. 1978;41:871-875.

Fellows KE, Freed MD, Keane JF, et al. Results of routine preoperative coronary angiography in tetralogy of Fallot. Circulation. 1975;51:571-577.

Fuster V. Assessing and modifying the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. Boston: Blackwell Publishing, 2002.

Fuster VF, Badimon L, Badimon JJ, et al. The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:242-250. 310–318

Gould KL, Kirkeeide RL, Buchi M. Coronary flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:459-474.

Greenberg MA, Fish BG, Spindola-Franco H. Congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries: classification and significance. Radiol Clin North Am. 1989;27:1127-1147.

Harding MB, Leither ME, Mark DB, et al. Ergonovine maleate testing during cardiac catheterization: a 10 year perspective in 3,447 patients without significant coronary artery disease or Prinzmetal’s variant angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:107-111.

Higgins CB, Lipton MJ. Radiography of acute myocardial infarction. Radiol Clin North Am. 1980;18:359-378.

Hauser M. Congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries. Heart. 2005;91:1240-1245.

Irvin RG. The angiographic prevalence of myocardial bridging in man. Chest. 1982;81:198-202.

Jacoby DS, Mohler ERIII, Rader DJ. Noninvasive atherosclerotic imaging for predicting cardiovascular events and assessing therapeutic interventions. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2004;7:20-27.

Kahn K, Fisher MR. MRI of cardiac pseudoaneurysm and other complications of myocardial infarction. Magn Reson Imaging. 1991;9:159-174.

Kaski JC, Rosano GM C, Collins P, et al. Cardiac syndrome X. Clinical characteristics and left ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:807-814.

Kereiakes DJ, Topol EJ, George BS, et al. Myocardial infarction with minimal coronary atherosclerosis in the era of thrombolytic reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:304-312.

Kim SY, Seo JB, Do K, et al. Coronary artery anomalies: classification and ECG-gated multidetector row CT findings with angiographic correlation. Radiographics. 2007;27:317-333.

Kimbiris JB, Iskandrian AS, Segal BL, et al. Anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries. Circulation. 1978;58:707-715.

Kloner RA, Przyklenk K, Patel B. Altered myocardial states: the stunned and hibernating myocardium. Am J Med. 1987;80(Suppl. 1A):14.

Konen E, Merchant N, Gutierrez C, et al. True versus false left ventricular aneurysm: differentiation with MR imaging-initial experience. Radiology. 2005;237:75-76.

Lee J, Choe YH, Kim HJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstration of anomalous origin of the right coronary artery from the left coronary sinus associated with acute myocardial infarction. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003;27:289-291.

Leschka S, Koepfli P, Husmann L, et al. Myocardial bridging: depiction rate and morphology at CT coronary angiography-comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Radiology. 2008;247:754-772.

Levin DC, Gardiner GAJr. Complex and simple coronary artery stenoses: a new way to interpret coronary angiograms based on morphologic features of lesions. Radiology. 1987;174:775-780.

Liberthson RR, Dinsmore RE, Bharatic S, et al. Aberrant coronary artery origin from the aorta. Diagnosis and clinical significance. Circulation. 1974;50:774-779.

Liberthson RR, Sagar K, Berkoben JP, et al. Congenital coronary arteriovenous fistula. Report of 13 patients, review of the literature and delineation of management. Circulation. 1979;59:849-854.

Manghat NE, Morgan-Hughes GJ, Marshall AJ, et al. Multidetector row computed tomography: imaging congenital coronary anomalies in adults. Heart. 2005;91:1515-1522.

Marcus ML, Schelbert HR, Skorton DJ, et al. Cardiac imaging: a companion to Braunwald’s heart disease. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1997.

Massie BM, Botvinick EH, Brundage BH, et al. Relationship of regional myocardial perfusion to segmental wall motion. A physiologic basis for understanding the presence and reversibility of asynergy. Circulation. 1978;58:1154-1173.

Megnien JK L, Sene V, Jeannin S, et al. Coronary calcification and its relation to extracoronary atherosclerosis in asymptomatic hypercholesterolemic men. Circulation. 1992;85:1799-1807.

Meizlish JL, Berger HJ, Plankey M, et al. Functional left ventricular aneurysm formation after acute anterior transmural myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:1001-1007.

Miller SW, Boucher CA. Assessing the adequacy of myocardial perfusion in man: anatomic and functional techniques. Radiol Clin North Am. 1985;23:589-597.

Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Greene RE, et al. Coronary, ventricular, and pulmonary abnormalities associated with rupture of the interventricular septum complicating myocardial infarction. Am J Roentgenol. 1978;131:571-577.

Mizuno K, Horiuchi K, Matui H, et al. Role of coronary collateral vessels during transient coronary occlusion during angioplasty assessed by hemodynamic, electrocardiographic and metabolic changes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:724-728.

Motoyasu M, Sakuma H, Ichikawa Y, et al. Prediction of regional functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction with low dose dobutamine stress cine MR imaging and contrast enhanced MR imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2003;5:573-574.

Mohlenkamp S, Hort W, Ge J, et al. Update of myocardial bridging. Circulation. 2002;107:2717-2731.

Nassir K, Budoff MJ, Post WS, et al. Electron beam CT versus helical CT scans for assessing coronary calcification: current utility and future directions. Am Heart J. 2003;147:977-979.

Petersen SE, Voigtlander T, Kreitner KF, et al. Late improvement of regional wall motion after the subacute phase of myocardial infarction treated by acute PTCA in a 7-month follow-up. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2003;5:487-495.

Pierard LA, Albert A, Henrard L, et al. Incidence and significance of pericardial effusion in acute myocardial infarction as determined by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;8:517-520.

Pijls NH J, de Bruyne B, Bech JW, et al. Coronary pressure measurement to assess the hemodynamic significance of serial stenoses within one coronary artery. Circulation. 2000;102:2371-2377.

Pijls NH J, de Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1997;334:1703-1708.

Reddy K, Gupta M, Hamby RI. Multiple coronary arteriosystemic fistulas. Am J Cardiol. 1974;33:304-307.

Rubins HB, Nelson DB, Noorbaloochi S, et al. Effectiveness of lipid-lowering medications in outpatients with coronary heart disease in the Department of Veterans Affairs System. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:1177-1182.

Sandstede JJ. Assessment of myocardial viability by MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:52-71.

Schwartz H, Leiboff RH, Bren GB, et al. Temporal evolution of the human coronary collateral circulation after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984;4:1088-1093.

Sharifi M, Frohlich TG, Silverman IM. Myocardial infarction with angiographically normal coronary arteries. Chest. 1995;107:37-40.

Simpson MT, Oberman A, Kouchoukos NT, et al. Prevalence of mural thrombi and systemic embolization with left ventricular aneurysm. Effect of anticoagulation therapy. Chest. 1980;77:473-479.

Sleight P. Current options in the management of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:4N-8N.

Stanford W, Thompson BH, Weiss RM. Coronary artery calcification: clinical significance and current methods of detection. Am J Roentgenol. 1993;171:1139-1147.

Syed M, Lesch M. Coronary artery aneurysm. A review. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1997;40:77-84.

Tunick PA, Slater J, Kronzon I, et al. Discrete atherosclerotic coronary artery aneurysms: a study of 20 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:279-282.

Virmani R, Forman MB, editors. Nonatherosclerotic ischemic heart disease. New York: Raven Press, 1989.

Wicky S, Lyon X, Kappenberger L. Silent single coronary artery anomaly depicted by magnetic resonance angiography. J Invasive Cardiol. 2002;14:328-330.

Wijns W, Vatner SF, Camici PG. Hibernating myocardium. New Engl J Med. 1998;339:173-181.

Yacoe ME, Dake MD. Development and resolution of systemic and coronary artery aneurysms in Kawasaki disease. Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159:708-710.