Imaging of the Chest

Published on 26/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 2.8 (46 votes)

This article have been viewed 2665 times

57 Imaging of the Chest

Chest imaging plays a central role in the management of critically ill patients. Bedside chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) are essential aids to both diagnosis and evaluating responses to therapy. In this chapter, we review chest imaging in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, focusing on radiography and CT. Radiographic techniques used at the bedside and appropriate positioning of various monitoring and life support devices will be discussed. In addition, imaging findings of common pathologic processes encountered in critically ill patients are described.

image Principles of Imaging in the Intensive Care Unit

Portable chest radiography plays a major role in patient care, especially in critically ill patients. Bedside chest radiographs are frequently obtained in ICU patients, and an understanding of how to interpret these films is important for ICU physicians. The American College of Radiology’s current guidelines call for daily chest radiographs of all mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU,1 but this approach is controversial. Some earlier studies supported this recommendation, arguing that early detection of unexpected findings on routine films may save money and decrease length of stay.24 However, several recent and larger studies have refuted this, demonstrating that a small minority of routine chest radiographs have any significant impact on patient management. Further, these studies suggest that transition to on-demand imaging saves money and radiation exposure without prolonging length of stay or negatively impacting other safety parameters.510

Regardless of the frequency with which they are obtained, interpretation of bedside chest radiographs can be quite challenging because of variation in quality due to both technical and patient factors. The ill health of the patient and multiple cumbersome life support devices limit proper upright patient positioning, while difficulty controlling respiratory and body motion can blur the radiographic images, all potentially leading to low-quality radiographs. The importance of dedicated and competent radiology technologists and an effective quality assurance program cannot be overemphasized.

image Interpreting the ICU Chest Radiograph

Monitoring and Support Devices

Endotracheal Tubes

On the chest radiograph, the position of an endotracheal tube (ETT) is determined by the location of the tube’s tip in relation to the carina with respect to the position of the patient’s chin. With the chin in the neutral position, the tip of the ETT should be 3 to 7 cm above the carina (Figure 57-1). Alternatively, the tip of the ETT should project over the T3 or T4 vertebral body, because the carina is located between T5 and T7 on anteroposterior radiographs in most individuals. Neck flexion and extension can result in 2 cm of downward or upward displacement, respectively, of the ETT.19 Projection of the anterior portion of the mandible over the lower cervical spine indicates neck flexion, whereas an unobscured cervical spine indicates neck extension.

The most common complication of ETT placement is inadvertent intubation of the right main bronchus (Figure 57-2) because of its shallower angle of departure from the trachea compared to the left main bronchus. Esophageal placement of the ETT can occur, although this is usually detected on physical examination. Radiographic findings of esophageal intubation include direct visualization of the ETT lateral to the tracheal wall, gaseous distention of the stomach, and displacement of the trachea by an overdistended balloon cuff.

Tracheostomy Tubes

The tip of a tracheostomy tube should be several centimeters above the carina, and the tube’s diameter should be approximately two-thirds that of the trachea.20 Unlike ETTs, chin position does not affect tracheostomy tube position. Air is commonly seen in the subcutaneous tissue of the neck and upper mediastinum immediately after tracheostomy tube placement and should resolve over time. Pneumothorax and mediastinal hematoma, the latter manifesting as a dense mediastinum with full, convex margins, are more worrisome complications of tracheostomy tube placement that should not be overlooked.

Pulmonary Artery Catheters

Pulmonary artery catheters measure intracardiac and intrapulmonary pressures reflecting volume status, cardiac function, and vascular tone. Their use is declining in many ICUs because recent studies demonstrate limited utility in affecting patient outcomes in a variety of clinical settings.22,23 Nevertheless, when they are used, accurate placement is critical for proper interpretation. The catheters are usually introduced via an internal jugular or subclavian approach; less commonly they may be inserted through the femoral vein. They then traverse the central venous system into the right ventricle, through the pulmonic valve into the main, then right (less commonly left) pulmonary artery, then “wedge” in a proximal interlobar artery. If the tip extends beyond these larger arteries (Figure 57-4), pulmonary infarction from occlusion of the pulmonary vessel or development of a pseudoaneurysm can ensue. The balloon at the catheter tip should be inflated only during placement or when obtaining pressure measurements, so an inflated balloon should never be present on a portable chest radiograph. Complications are similar to those that occur with other central venous catheters but also include pulmonary vascular perforation and pulmonary hemorrhage.

Enteric Tubes

Enteric tubes are placed into the stomach or proximal small bowel via a transoral or transnasal approach and come in a variety of sizes and configurations (see Figure 57-1). These tubes are frequently placed in ICU patients, especially those who are endotracheally intubated. Although the best position for feeding tubes is controversial, placement distal to the pylorus may decrease the risk of aspiration.24 Usually, enteric tube position is easily determined by a chest or abdominal radiograph, although they may occasionally be obscured by excess soft tissue in obese patients. These tubes can coil in the pharynx or esophagus, putting the patient at risk for aspiration if tube feeds are initiated. Inadvertent insertion into the tracheobronchial tree (Figure 57-6) and esophageal perforation are rare but have more serious consequences.

image Lung Abnormalities

Diffuse Lung Opacities

Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

Several conditions can cause the pattern of homogenous lung opacity that represents, or mimics, pulmonary edema. The classic appearance of cardiogenic pulmonary edema is that of bilateral perihilar fluffy opacities, sometimes called a butterfly or bat-wing pattern, in association with an enlarged heart, engorgement of central pulmonary veins, interstitial edema, and vascular redistribution or cephalization of vessels (Figure 57-7). Pleural effusions may also be present. The opacities associated with cardiogenic pulmonary edema can fluctuate rapidly, a clue to its diagnosis. However, this classic appearance is rare in the ICU. The bat-wing pattern is seen in few patients with pulmonary edema; opacities may be asymmetrical due to variations in patient position and underlying cardiopulmonary disease, such as emphysema or mitral valve insufficiency. In addition, cephalization of the vasculature is not a very useful marker of edema in supine ICU patients. Finally, some patients, particularly those with milder disease or chronically elevated left ventricular pressures, may only have more subtle radiographic findings, such as peribronchial cuffing and indistinct vessels.25,26 Serial measurements of vascular pedicle width may be a useful adjunct indication of intravascular volume status in these patients.27

Neurogenic Pulmonary Edema

Neurogenic pulmonary edema can occur in the setting of any cerebral insult, including intracranial hemorrhage or mass, head trauma, stroke, seizures, or infection. Elevated microvascular pressure and increased vascular permeability in the lung both appear to play a role in its development.28 Neurogenic pulmonary edema can develop within hours after the neurologic insult or several days later. On the chest radiograph, neurogenic edema usually manifests as a diffuse, homogeneous pulmonary opacity similar to that of cardiogenic edema, but without an enlarged cardiac silhouette and often without the indistinct vessels that suggest engorgement. (Figure 57-8). Occasionally, opacities may have a focal distribution reflecting gravity, patient position, and heterogeneity in pulmonary venous pressure. Rapid clearing of the lungs within days of resolution of the neurologic insult is characteristic, in contrast to other forms of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema in which opacity can persist.28 It is important to note that some patients with neurologic injury are treated with large volumes of intravenous fluid, which may complicate the interpretation of pulmonary edema opacities on the chest radiograph.

Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are common in medical and surgical ICU patients and have a high mortality.2931 They are clinical syndromes defined by hypoxemia and diffuse bilateral lung opacities in the absence of left atrial hypertension.32 Both result from a massive inflammatory reaction in the lungs incited by a variety of causes, and they are radiographically indistinguishable. The severity of hypoxemia alone differentiates the two, with ARDS the more severe manifestation. In the acute phase of ARDS, diffuse ill-defined opacities often predominate in the periphery of the lungs. As the disease progresses, the entire hemithorax can become opacified on chest radiographs (Figure 57-9), although CT typically demonstrates heterogeneity in lung aeration. This finding has led to much discussion regarding appropriate ventilator management of ARDS to balance alveolar recruitment while avoiding hyperinflation of spared lung tissue (see Chapter 58). During the subacute phase (5 to 10 days later), proliferation of endothelial cells and fibroblasts leads to a pattern of progressive lung destruction. Some patients recover from ARDS without any residual deficit in pulmonary function, but others progress to a chronic phase several weeks after the initial lung injury and have permanent respiratory sequelae. Fibrosis and focal emphysema are usually evident on these patients’ radiographs or CT scans.

Fat Embolism Syndrome

This syndrome is a rare but serious complication of recent severe fracture, usually of a long bone, and is characterized by pulmonary, cerebral, and cutaneous manifestations 12 to 72 hours after the injury. In mild cases, the chest radiograph often shows no abnormality. In more severe cases, the initial chest radiograph may be normal, but within 12 to 72 hours, airspace and interstitial opacities develop that resemble other causes of pulmonary edema (Figure 57-10), then resolve 10 to 14 days later in the absence of superimposed disease.33 CT scans are often not performed in these patients, but when available, variable findings including focal or diffuse areas of consolidation or “ground-glass” appearance and small nodules have all been described.34,35 Rarely, filling defects from fat emboli in pulmonary arteries are reported.36 The history of fracture, associated nonpulmonary symptoms such as a petechial rash, and delay in onset of radiographic opacities are all clues to distinguish fat embolism syndrome from other causes of a pulmonary edema pattern on chest radiographs.

Unilateral Pulmonary Edema Pattern

Postpneumonectomy pulmonary edema is described later. Reexpansion pulmonary edema (RPE) rarely follows treatment of pneumothorax or pleural effusion. It is more likely to occur if the lung has been chronically collapsed, if large volumes of air or pleural fluid (greater than 1 L) are removed rapidly, or pleural pressure drops below −20 cm H2O.37 Recent studies call these absolute numbers into question, however.38 Usually within a few hours after evacuation of air or fluid, patients develop symptoms such as cough, dyspnea, and tachypnea; hypotension due to third-spacing of edema fluid in the affected lung has been described. Chest imaging reveals diffuse homogeneous opacity on the affected side, and in rare cases, the contralateral lung may also demonstrate opacities.

Focal Lung Opacities

In this section we will describe the most common etiologies of lung opacities of a more heterogeneous nature. This is a diverse group that includes lobar or multilobar opacities, nodular or multinodular abnormalities, or other scattered patches of density that do not resemble the bilateral, more diffuse pattern of pulmonary edema.

Pneumonia

The radiographic hallmark of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CAP) is lung consolidation with air bronchograms in a segmental, lobar, or (less commonly) diffuse distribution (Figure 57-12). In comparison, the majority of patients with healthcare-associated or nosocomial pneumonia (HCAP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia, are more likely to have bilateral multilobar disease.39 Radiographs typically demonstrate bronchopneumonia characterized by patchy peribronchial opacities, bronchial wall thickening, and sometimes volume loss.

CT scanning is unnecessary in most patients with community-acquired pneumonia and a typical chest radiograph as described; in such patients, a given radiographic pattern is poorly predictive of a specific causative organism.40 CT scans may be helpful for patients whose chest radiographs are atypical or have nonresolving opacities, patients who are immunosuppressed, or patients who may require invasive procedures such as bronchoscopy. In these cases, CT can provide additional anatomic detail that may assist in identifying a pathogen or noninfectious etiology, or in guiding interventions. Ground-glass opacities are nonspecific, but airspace disease including consolidation and air bronchograms suggests bacterial, mycoplasma, or fungal pneumonia. Centrilobular nodules are infrequently found in bacterial pneumonia and instead suggest mycoplasma, fungal, or viral infection (Figure 57-13).

Chest radiography and CT may also show complications of pneumonia. Cavitation can occur in some bacterial infections, particularly in nosocomial pneumonia or immunocompromised patients, and may progress to larger abscess or pneumatocele formation. Pleural effusions are also more common in nosocomial pneumonia; a minority will become complicated and may develop into empyema (see later discussion).39

Parenchymal Abnormalities Specific to Thoracic Surgery Patients

Thoracoscopy or thoracotomy with lobectomy or pneumonectomy can alter the expected appearance of the intrathoracic structures, and knowledge of the normal expected findings after surgery allows for better identification of complications.

Pneumonectomy

Radiographs obtained immediately after pneumonectomy normally show midline position of the mediastinum and gas filling the pneumonectomy space. Over the first few days, the ipsilateral hemidiaphragm elevates, and fluid begins to accumulate within the pneumonectomy space as the gas is resorbed. In most cases, one-half to two-thirds of the hemithorax fills within the first week, and the remainder over the next several weeks to months.41 The mediastinum shifts toward the operative side as the remaining lung hyperinflates and herniates across the midline, anterior to the heart. The degree of mediastinal displacement depends primarily on the compliance and the degree of hyperinflation of the remaining lung. Appropriate mediastinal displacement is the most reliable indicator of a normal course after pneumonectomy. Failure of the mediastinum to shift to the operative side indicates an abnormality in the pneumonectomy cavity such as bronchopleural fistula, hemothorax, or empyema. Postoperative complications of pneumonectomy can occur early (within a few days of surgery) or late; in this review, we will focus on the early complications.

Postpneumonectomy pulmonary edema is an uncommon condition with a high mortality rate, due at least in part to an increase in pulmonary capillary permeability. Radiographic features can be mild, with peribronchial cuffing and ill-defined vascular structures. In more severe cases, the pattern is identical to that of ARDS. Bronchopleural fistula is another infrequent but life-threatening complication of pneumonectomy, which manifests with dyspnea and sometimes hemoptysis. Both pulmonary edema and bronchopleural fistula are more common after right pneumonectomy; in the latter case, the shorter length of the bronchial stump predisposes to leakage. Radiographic findings of bronchopleural fistula include persistent pneumothorax or subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema after surgery, a decrease in height of more than 1.5 cm of the gas-fluid level in the pneumonectomy cavity, and mediastinal shift away from the operative side rather than toward it (Figure 57-15).

Parenchymal Abnormalities Specific to Trauma Patients

Imaging of trauma patients focuses on identifying acute complications from the trauma as well as recognizing additional injuries that may have been obscured or overlooked on initial evaluation.

Pulmonary Contusion

Contusion is the most common lung injury after blunt chest trauma, occurring in up to 70% of patients.42 It is characterized by leakage of blood into the pulmonary interstitium and alveolar spaces and clinically presents with dyspnea, tachycardia, and hypoxia. On chest radiographs, the contusion manifests as pulmonary opacity in a nonanatomic distribution, in contrast to the usual segmental or lobar distribution of pneumonia or atelectasis. Contusion usually occurs in the lung periphery deep to the site of chest wall impact, although it is sometimes seen opposite the location of the injury owing to a contrecoup effect. The timing of the developing opacity on the chest radiograph suggests the diagnosis in the setting of acute trauma, presenting within the first several hours after injury and resolving within 14 days. CT is more sensitive than chest radiography for detecting pulmonary contusion as well as associated chest wall injuries.43,44 The appearance on CT of lung contusion ranges from patchy, ground-glass opacity to dense consolidation in a nonsegmental distribution, often sparing 1 to 2 mm of subpleural lung (Figure 57-16).

Pneumothorax

Pneumothorax can occur spontaneously, in association with malignancy or other destructive lung process, iatrogenically, or as a result of trauma. In the latter category, it is more common with blunt chest trauma than with penetrating injuries to the chest. The clinical significance of pneumothorax depends more on the patient’s underlying cardiopulmonary function than the physical size of the pneumothorax, but all pneumothoraces can rapidly become life threatening if positive-pressure mechanical ventilation is instituted.

In the supine position, free gas will localize in the nondependent caudal and anteromedial aspects of the pleural space. Therefore, evidence of pneumothorax on the supine chest radiograph is often indirect and includes a low, sharp costophrenic sulcus (deep sulcus sign), relative basilar hyperlucency, increased sharpness of the ipsilateral hemidiaphragm, increased sharpness of cardiac border, presence of gas in the minor fissure, and caudal displacement of the ipsilateral hemidiaphragm (Figure 57-18). CT is more sensitive than chest radiography for detecting pneumothorax and is especially helpful in critically ill patients who cannot tolerate upright or lateral decubitus positioning. In tension pneumothorax, air enters the pleural cavity via a “ball-valve” mechanism by which it cannot escape. Chest radiographs demonstrate mediastinal shift away from the involved hemithorax, but this is infrequently captured on film owing to the clinical urgency of associated hypotension and hypoxia, mandating immediate bedside treatment.

Diaphragmatic Rupture

Rupture of the diaphragm is a rare complication in patients admitted with trauma; it is more common in penetrating trauma.46 Delay in diagnosis is common, especially in patients receiving positive-pressure ventilation, because the injury is masked by the positive-pressure gradient between the thoracic and abdominal cavities. Radiographic findings of diaphragmatic rupture include a gas-filled viscus or the tip of a properly placed enteric tube above the diaphragm, irregularity of diaphragmatic contour, elevation of the affected hemidiaphragm without atelectasis, and contralateral shift of the mediastinum without pleural effusion or pneumothorax. Diaphragmatic rupture is much more easily seen on CT, where findings include discontinuity of the diaphragm, visceral herniation, waist-like constriction of the bowel (collar sign), and layering of the herniated viscus against the posterior ribs (dependent viscera sign) (Figure 57-19).

Mediastinal Disease

In this section we will focus on radiographic findings in several diagnoses that are relevant to the trauma population, with a particular emphasis on blunt trauma.

Acute Traumatic Aortic Injury

Tears of the thoracic aorta (Figure 57-20) are caused by acute deceleration injury such as occurs in a high-speed motor vehicle crash or a fall, or as a result of crush injury to the chest. A tear of the thoracic aorta almost always occurs in a transverse orientation, typically at the aortic isthmus. Tears of the ascending aorta or complete transection are nearly universally fatal, but if the adventitia remains intact, a pseudoaneurysm may form, usually with some amount of surrounding hemomediastinum. These may rupture at any time and require immediate surgical intervention.

Radiographic abnormalities that suggest aortic injury include a dense mediastinum with convex margins to the lungs, indistinct aortic contours, rightward deviation of the trachea, downward displacement of the left main bronchus, and thickening of the right paratracheal stripe Mediastinal widening is often mentioned as a sign of mediastinal hematoma, but this is an imprecise finding and not specific for aortic injury.47,48 In patients whose chest radiographs are equivocal or highly suspicious for aortic injury, contrast medium–enhanced CT is indicated. CT findings of acute aortic injury include irregularity of the aortic wall, pseudoaneurysm, abrupt change in aortic caliber, intimal flap, extravasation of contrast material, and periaortic hematoma. Evidence of hemothorax may also be seen, usually on the left, on the chest radiograph or CT.

Tracheobronchial Tree Rupture

Rupture of the tracheobronchial tree is an uncommon consequence of blunt trauma, with bronchial rupture occurring more often than rupture of the trachea.49 In bronchial rupture, the injury is usually located in the main bronchus near the carina. Disruption of the trachea typically involves the membranous portion just proximal to the carina.

Tracheobronchial disruption often causes pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax visible on chest radiographs and/or CT. The “fallen lung” sign (Figure 57-21), indicating complete bronchial disruption, describes the severed and collapsed lung lying against the posterolateral aspect of the chest wall or the diaphragm. Other findings that suggest tracheobronchial injury include a large pneumothorax not responding to percutaneous drainage, or pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum in the absence of pleural effusion. However, it should be noted that pneumomediastinum is not specific for tracheobronchial or esophageal injury after blunt trauma.50 Bronchoscopy is usually performed to confirm tracheobronchial injury, although CT with two-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction may prove a useful noninvasive alternative.51

Esophageal Rupture

Acute rupture of the esophagus can occur by iatrogenic means, from blunt chest trauma, or in the setting of severe retching or vomiting (Boerhaave syndrome). Trauma patients are more likely to have an injury in the upper thoracic esophagus, whereas Boerhaave syndrome usually involves the lower third of the esophagus.52 Mediastinitis and septic shock rapidly follow esophageal rupture, accounting for the relatively high mortality rate. The radiographic findings of esophageal rupture include a dense mediastinum with convex margins to the lungs, pneumomediastinum, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, and hydropneumothorax. On CT, the area of greatest esophageal thickening often represents the perforation site. CT also provides more detailed information than radiography on developing complications. Contrast esophagography is the standard approach to confirm the diagnosis.

Thoracic Duct Rupture

The most common cause of thoracic duct disruption is iatrogenic injury.53 Thoracic duct injury from blunt chest injury is very rare and is thought to occur with hyperextension of the thoracic spine. Chylothorax, which usually develops several days to weeks after the trauma, is the typical radiographic finding. The delay in development of chylothorax is a clue to the diagnosis, particularly in differentiating it from traumatic hemothorax (see earlier discussion). The injury site is best identified with lymphangiography.

Vascular Disease

Pulmonary Thromboembolic Disease

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially lethal condition that can be difficult to diagnose clinically because of the nonspecific clinical presentation. Hospitalized patients are at increased risk of developing a PE. Although many imaging tests, including ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy and conventional pulmonary angiography, have been used to diagnose pulmonary embolism, CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has emerged as the initial imaging study of choice, given its high sensitivity and specificity and generally good interobserver agreement.5457 CTPA has the additional advantage of evaluating the entire thorax for other explanations for cardiopulmonary signs and symptoms. Specifically in ICU patients, CTPA appears to be an accurate diagnostic technique; indirect CT venography (CTV) compares favorably with ultrasound in evaluating venous thrombosis and improves the diagnostic yield of CTPA alone.5759 The addition of CTV to PE evaluation protocols is a controversial topic because it requires additional radiation and has not been conclusively demonstrated to improve patient outcomes compared to CTPA alone.59 However, this has not yet been well studied in hospitalized or critically ill patients.

Many findings on conventional chest radiographs have been described in patients with pulmonary embolism, but they are inconsistently present and are nonspecific. Features diagnostic of acute pulmonary embolism on CTPA include a partial or complete filling defect in the pulmonary arteries (Figure 57-22). Associated lung abnormalities such as regional oligemia, volume loss, and a wedge-shaped subpleural opacity may also be present.

Annotated References

Hejblum G, Chalumeau-Lemoine L, Ioos V, et al. Comparison of routine and on-demand prescription of chest radiographs in mechanically ventilated adults: a multicentre, cluster-randomised, two-period crossover study. Lancet. 2009;374(9702):1687-1693.

This paper reports the results of a multicenter randomized study involving 849 patients, comparing the safety and utility of daily chest radiographs versus an on-demand strategy for mechanically ventilated patients. The results indicate that on-demand chest radiographs result in fewer x-rays for patients, without reduction in quality of care or safety. A brief review of the relevant literature is performed.

Hill JR, Horner PE, Primack SL. ICU imaging. Clin Chest Med. 2008;29(1):59-76. vi

Rubinowitz AN, Siegel MD, Tocino I. Thoracic imaging in the ICU. Crit Care Clin. 2007;23(3):539-573.

These are concise, well-written, and well-illustrated reviews of thoracic radiology in the ICU. Both articles focus on the medical ICU population; findings specific to surgical and trauma patients are not discussed in depth.

Miller LA. Chest wall, lung, and pleural space trauma. Radiol Clin North Am. 2006;44(2):213-224. viii

Sangster GP, González-Beicos A, Carbo AI, et al. Blunt traumatic injuries of the lung parenchyma, pleura, thoracic wall, and intrathoracic airways: multidetector computer tomography imaging findings. Emerg Radiol. 2007;14(5):297-310.

These are excellent overviews of radiologic findings in the thoracic trauma patient population. Sangster et al. focuses on CT and is beautifully illustrated; Miller et al. provides a more general radiographic overview.

Moores LK, Holley AB. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography and venography: diagnostic and prognostic properties. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;29(1):3-14.

This review summarizes landmark and recent studies evaluating the accuracy of CT pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Issues specific to ICU patients are discussed, as are the data regarding the controversial topics of isolated subsegmental pulmonary emboli, indeterminate CT scans, and lower-extremity imaging by CT venography.

References

1 Amorosa J. Appropriateness criteria: routine chest radiograph: American College of Radiology; 2006, reviewed 2008.

2 Henschke CI, Pasternack GS, Schroeder S, Hart KK, Herman PG. Bedside chest radiography: diagnostic efficacy. Radiology. 1983;149(1):23-26.

3 Bekemeyer WB, Crapo RO, Calhoon S, Cannon CY, Clayton PD. Efficacy of chest radiography in a respiratory intensive care unit. A prospective study. Chest. 1985;88:691-696.

4 Kundel HL, Seshadri SB, Langlotz CP, et al. Prospective study of a PACS: information flow and clinical action in a medical intensive care unit. Radiology. 1996;199:143-149.

5 Hejblum G, Chalumeau-Lemoine L, Ioos V, et al. Comparison of routine and on-demand prescription of chest radiographs in mechanically ventilated adults: a multicentre, cluster-randomised, two-period crossover study. Lancet. 2009;374:1687-1693.

6 Mets O, Spronk PE, Binnekade J, Stoker J, de Mol BA, Schultz MJ. Elimination of daily routine chest radiographs does not change on-demand radiography practice in post-cardiothoracic surgery patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:139-144.

7 Hendrikse KA, Gratama JW, Hove W, Rommes JH, Schultz MJ, Spronk PE. Low value of routine chest radiographs in a mixed medical-surgical ICU. Chest. 2007;132:823-828.

8 Krivopal M, Shlobin OA, Schwartzstein RM. Utility of daily routine portable chest radiographs in mechanically ventilated patients in the medical ICU. Chest. 2003;123:1607-1614.

9 Graat ME, Stoker J, Vroom MB, Schultz MJ. Can we abandon daily routine chest radiography in intensive care patients? J Intensive Care Med. 2005;20:238-246.

10 Clec’h C, Simon P, Hamdi A, et al. Are daily routine chest radiographs useful in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients? A randomized study. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:264-270.

11 McAdams HP, Samei E, Dobbins J3rd, Tourassi GD, Ravin CE. Recent advances in chest radiography. Radiology. 2006;241:663-683.

12 Kitazono MT, Lau CT, Parada AN, Renjen P, Miller WTJr. Differentiation of pleural effusions from parenchymal opacities: accuracy of bedside chest radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:407-412.

13 Gunnarsson T, Theodorsson A, Karlsson P, et al. Mobile computerized tomography scanning in the neurosurgery intensive care unit: increase in patient safety and reduction of staff workload. J Neurosurg. 2000;93:432-436.

14 Gunnarsson T, Hillman J. Clinical usefulness of bedside intracranial morphological monitoring: mobile computerized tomography in the neurosurgery intensive care unit. Report of three cases. Neurosurg Focus. 2000;9:e5.

15 Hillman J, Sturnegk P, Yonas H, et al. Bedside monitoring of CBF with xenon-CT and a mobile scanner: a novel method in neurointensive care. Br J Neurosurg. 2005;19:395-401.

16 Mayo-Smith WW, Davis LM, Clements NC, Cobb CM, Smith WJ, Tung GA. CT of the brain: a comparison of transportable and fixed-platform scanners. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:1481-1484.

17 Teichgraber UK, Pinkernelle J, Jurgensen JS, Ricke J, Kaisers U. Portable computed tomography performed on the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:491-495.

18 Parmar HA, Lim TC, Goh JS, Tan JT, Sitoh YY, Hui F. Providing optimal radiology service in the severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak: use of mobile CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:57-60.

19 Conrardy PA, Goodman LR, Lainge F, Singer MM. Alteration of endotracheal tube position. Flexion and extension of the neck. Crit Care Med. 1976;4:7-12.

20 Zarshenas Z, Sparschu RA. Catheter placement and misplacement. Crit Care Clin. 1994;10:417-436.

21 Collins J, Stern E, editors. Chest Radiology: The Essentials. Second ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007.

22 Greenberg SB, Murphy GS, Vender JS. Current use of the pulmonary artery catheter. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15:249-253.

23 Harvey S, Young D, Brampton W, et al. Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD003408.

24 Drover JW. Gastric versus postpyloric feeding. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2007;17:765-775.

25 Gehlbach BK, Geppert E. The pulmonary manifestations of left heart failure. Chest. 2004;125:669-682.

26 Rubinowitz AN, Siegel MD, Tocino I. Thoracic imaging in the ICU. Crit Care Clin. 2007;23:539-573.

27 Miller RR, Ely EW. Radiographic measures of intravascular volume status: the role of vascular pedicle width. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006;12:255-262.

28 Baumann A, Audibert G, McDonnell J, Mertes PM. Neurogenic pulmonary edema. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51:447-455.

29 Goss CH, Brower RG, Hudson LD, Rubenfeld GD. Incidence of acute lung injury in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1607-1611.

30 Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Peabody E, et al. Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1685-1693.

31 Avecillas JF, Freire AX, Arroliga AC. Clinical epidemiology of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: incidence, diagnosis, and outcomes. Clin Chest Med. 2006;27:549-557. abstract vii

32 Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, et al. The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;149:818-824.

33 Muangman N, Stern EJ, Bulger EM, Jurkovich GJ, Mann FA. Chest radiographic evolution in fat embolism syndrome. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88:1854-1860.

34 Van den Brande FG, Hellemans S, De Schepper A, et al. Post-traumatic severe fat embolism syndrome with uncommon CT findings. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006;34:102-106.

35 Gallardo X, Castaner E, Mata JM, Rimola J, Branera J. Nodular pattern at lung computed tomography in fat embolism syndrome: a helpful finding. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006;30:254-257.

36 Nucifora G, Hysko F, Vit A, Vasciaveo A. Pulmonary fat embolism: common and unusual computed tomography findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:806-807.

37 Neustein SM. Reexpansion pulmonary edema. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21:887-891.

38 Feller-Kopman D, Berkowitz D, Boiselle P, Ernst A. Large-volume thoracentesis and the risk of reexpansion pulmonary edema. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:1656-1661.

39 Sharma S, Maycher B, Eschun G. Radiological imaging in pneumonia: recent innovations. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2007;13:159-169.

40 Boersma WG, Daniels JM, Lowenberg A, Boeve WJ, van de Jagt EJ. Reliability of radiographic findings and the relation to etiologic agents in community-acquired pneumonia. Respir Med. 2006;100:926-932.

41 Chae EJ, Seo JB, Kim SY, et al. Radiographic and CT findings of thoracic complications after pneumonectomy. Radiographics. 2006;26:1449-1468.

42 Peters S, Nicolas V, Heyer CM. Multidetector computed tomography-spectrum of blunt chest wall and lung injuries in polytraumatized patients. Clin Radiol. 2010;65:333-338.

43 Sangster GP, Gonzalez-Beicos A, Carbo AI, et al. Blunt traumatic injuries of the lung parenchyma, pleura, thoracic wall, and intrathoracic airways: multidetector computer tomography imaging findings. Emerg Radiol. 2007;14:297-310.

44 Miller LA. Chest wall, lung, and pleural space trauma. Radiol Clin North Am. 2006;44:213-224. viii

45 Mirvis SE. Imaging of acute thoracic injury: the advent of MDCT screening. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2005;26:305-331.

46 Mirvis SE, Shanmuganagthan K. Imaging hemidiaphragmatic injury. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1411-1421.

47 Mirvis SE. Thoracic vascular injury. Radiol Clin North Am. 2006;44:181-197. vii

48 Wintermark M, Wicky S, Schnyder P. Imaging of acute traumatic injuries of the thoracic aorta. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:431-442.

49 Bertelsen S, Howitz P. Injuries of the trachea and bronchi. Thorax. 1972;27:188-194.

50 Molena D, Burr N, Zucchiatti A, et al. The incidence and clinical significance of pneumomediastinum found on computed tomography scan in blunt trauma patients. Am Surg. 2009;75:1081-1083.

51 Faure A, Floccard B, Pilleul F, et al. Multiplanar reconstruction: a new method for the diagnosis of tracheobronchial rupture? Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:2173-2178.

52 Wu JT, Mattox KL, Wall MJJr. Esophageal perforations: new perspectives and treatment paradigms. J Trauma. 2007;63:1173-1184.

53 Nair SK, Petko M, Hayward MP. Aetiology and management of chylothorax in adults. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;32:362-369.

54 Hogg K, Brown G, Dunning J, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with CT pulmonary angiography: a systematic review. Emerg Med J. 2006;23:172-178.

55 Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou KH, et al. Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293:2012-2017.

56 Mos IC, Klok FA, Kroft LJ, DE Roos A, Dekkers OM, Huisman MV. Safety of ruling out acute pulmonary embolism by normal computed tomography pulmonary angiography in patients with an indication for computed tomography: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7:1491-1498.

57 Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2317-2327.

58 Ravenel JG, Northam MC, Nguyen SA. Negative predictive value of computed tomography pulmonary angiography with indirect computed tomography venography in intensive care unit patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009;33:739-742.

59 Moores LK, Holley AB. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography and venography: diagnostic and prognostic properties. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;29:3-14.