Humidification and filtration

Published on 07/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3534 times

Humidification and filtration

Inhaling dry gases can cause damage to the cells lining the respiratory tract, impairing ciliary function. Within a short period of just 10 min of ventilation with dry gases, cilia function will be disrupted. This increases the patient’s susceptibility to respiratory tract infection. A decrease in body temperature (due to the loss of the latent heat of vaporization) occurs as the respiratory tract humidifies the dry gases.

Air fully saturated with water vapour has an absolute humidity of about 44 mg/L at 37°C. During nasal breathing at rest, inspired gases become heated to 36°C with a relative humidity of about 80–90% by the time they reach the carina, largely because of heat transfer in the nose. Mouth breathing reduces this to 60–70% relative humidity. The humidifying property of soda lime can achieve an absolute humidity of 29 mg/L when used with the circle breathing system.

The isothermic boundary point is where 37°C and 100% humidity have been achieved. Normally it is a few centimetres distal to the carina. Insertion of a tracheal or tracheostomy tube bypasses the upper airway and moves the isothermic boundary distally.

Heat and moisture exchanger (HME) humidifiers

These are compact, inexpensive, passive and effective humidifiers for most clinical situations (Figs 9.1 and 9.2). The British Standard describes them as ‘devices intended to retain a portion of the patient’s expired moisture and heat, and return it to the respiratory tract during inspiration’.

The efficiency of an HME is gauged by the proportion of heat and moisture it returns to the patient. Adequate humidification is achieved with a relative humidity of 60–70%. Inspired gases are warmed to temperatures of between 29° and 34°C. HMEs should be able to deliver an absolute humidity of a minimum of 30 g/m3 water vapour at 30°C. HMEs are easy and convenient to use with no need for an external power source.

Mechanism of action

1. Warm humidified exhaled gases pass through the humidifier, causing water vapour to condense on the cooler HME medium. The condensed water is evaporated and returned to the patient with the next inspiration of dry and cold gases, humidifying them. There is no addition of water over and above that previously exhaled.

2. The greater the temperature difference between each side of the HME, the greater the potential for heat and moisture to be transferred during exhalation and inspiration.

3. The HME humidifier requires about 5–20 min before it reaches its optimal ability to humidify dry gases.

4. Some designs with a pore size of about 0.2 µm can filter out bacteria, viruses and particles from the gas flow in either direction, as discussed later. They are called heat and moisture exchanging filters (HMEF).

5. Their volumes range from 7.8 mL (paediatric practice) to 100 mL. This increases the apparatus dead space.

6. The performance of the HME is affected by:

Problems in practice and safety features

Hot water bath humidifier

This humidifier is used to deliver relative humidities higher than the heat moisture exchange humidifier. It is usually used in intensive care units (Fig. 9.4).

Mechanism of action

1. Powered by electricity, the water is heated to between 45°C and 60°C (Fig. 9.5).

2. Dry cold gas enters the container where some passes close to the water surface, gaining maximum saturation. Some gas passes far from the water surface, gaining minimal saturation and heat.

3. The container has a large surface area for vaporization. This is to ensure that the gas is fully saturated at the temperature of the water bath. The amount of gas effectively bypassing the water surface should be minimal.

4. The tubing has poor thermal insulation properties causing a decrease in the temperature of inspired gases. This is partly compensated for by the release of the heat of condensation.

5. By raising the temperature in the humidifier above body temperature, it is possible to deliver gases at 37°C and fully saturated. The temperature of gases at the patient’s end is measured by a thermistor. Via a feedback mechanism, the thermistor controls the temperature of water in the container.

6. The temperature of gases at the patient’s end depends on the surface area available for vaporization, the flow rate and the amount of cooling and condensation taking place in the inspiratory tubing.

7. Some designs have heated elements placed in the inspiratory and expiratory limb of the breathing system to maintain the temperature and prevent rain out (condensation) within the tube.

Problems in practice and safety features

Nebulizers (Fig. 9.6)

These produce a mist of microdroplets of water suspended in a gaseous medium. The quantity of water droplets delivered is not limited by gas temperature (as is the case with vapour). The smaller the droplets, the more stable they are. Droplets of 2–5 µm deposit in the tracheobronchial tree, whereas 0.5–1 µm droplets deposit in the alveoli. In addition to delivering water, nebulizers are used to deliver medications to peripheral airways and radioactive isotopes in diagnostic lung ventilation imaging.

There are three types: gas driven, spinning disc and ultrasonic.

Gas-driven (jet) nebulizer

Bacterial and viral filters

These minimize the risk of cross-transmission of bacteria and/or viruses between patients using the same anaesthetic breathing systems. The British Standard defines them as ‘devices intended to reduce transmission of particulates, including micro-organisms, in breathing systems’. It is thought that the incidence of bleeding after orotracheal intubation is 86%. The filter should be positioned as close to the patient as possible, e.g. on the disposable catheter mount, to protect the rest of the breathing system, ventilator and anaesthetic machine. It is recommended that a new filter should be used for each patient. A humidification element can be added producing a heat and moisture exchanging filter (HMEF) (see Fig. 9.1).

Mechanism of action

There are five main mechanisms by which filtration can be achieved on a fibre:

1. Direct interception: large particles (=1 µm), such as dust and large bacteria, are physically prevented from passing through the pores of the filter because of their large size.

2. Inertial impaction: smaller particles (0.5–1 µm) collide with the filter medium because of their inertia. They tend to continue in straight lines, carried along by their own momentum rather than following the path of least resistance taken by the gas. The particles are held by Van der Waal’s electrostatic forces.

3. Diffusional interception: very small particles (<0.5 µm), such as viruses, are captured because they undergo considerable Brownian motion (i.e. random movement) because of their very small mass. This movement increases their apparent diameter so that they are more likely to be captured by the filter element.

4. Electrostatic attraction: this can be very important but it is difficult to measure as it requires knowing the charge on the particles and on the fibres. Increasing the charge on either the particles or the fibres increases the filtration efficiency. Charged particles are attracted to oppositely charged fibres by coulombic attraction.

5. Gravitational settling: this affects large particles (>5 µm). The rate of settling depends on the balance between the effect of gravity on the particle and the buoyancy of the particle. In filters used in anaesthesia, it has minimal effect as most of the settling occurs before the particles reach the filter.

Electrostatic filters (Fig. 9.8)

1. The element used is subjected to an electric field producing a felt-like material with high polarity. One type of fibre becomes positively charged and the other type negatively charged. Usually two polymer fibres (modacrylic and polyprolyne) are used.

2. A flat layer of filter material can be used as the resistance to gas flow is lower per unit area.

3. These filters rely on the electrical charge to attract oppositely charged particles from the gas flow. They have a filtration efficiency of 99.99%.

4. The electrical charge increases the efficiency of the filter when the element is dry but can deteriorate rapidly when it is wet. The resistance to flow increases when the element is wet.

5. The electrical charge on the filter fibres decays with time so it has a limited life.

6. A hygroscopic layer can be added to the filter in order to provide humidification. In such an HMEF, the pressure drop across the element and thus the resistance to breathing will also increase with gradual absorption of water.

Pleated hydrophobic filters (Fig. 9.9)

1. The very small pore size filter membrane provides adequate filtration over longer periods of time. These filters rely on the naturally occurring electrostatic interactions to remove the particles. A filtration efficiency of 99.999% can be achieved.

2. To achieve minimal pressure drop across the device with such a small pore size, so allowing high gas flows while retaining low resistance, a large surface area is required. Pleated paper filters made of inorganic fibres are used to achieve this.

3. The forces between individual liquid water molecules are stronger than those between the water molecules and the hydrophobic membrane. This leads to the collection of water on the surface of the membrane with no absorption. Such a filter can successfully prevent the passage of water under pressures as high as 60 cm H2O.

4. Although hydrophobic filters provide some humidification, a hygroscopic element can be added to improve humidification.

5. Currently there is no evidence showing any type of filter is clinically superior to another.

Further reading

Medical Devices Agency. Heat and moisture exchangers (HMEs) including those intended for use as breathing system filters. UK Market-Product review. London: Medical Devices Agency; 1998. No. 347

MHRA. Medical advice alert (MDA/2004/013). Online. Available at http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/dts-bs/documents/medicaldevicealert/con008574.pdf, 2004.

MHRA. Medical device alert (MDA/2004/037). Online. Available at http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/dts-bs/documents/medicaldevicealert/con008522.pdf, 2004.

Turnbull D., Fisher P.C., Mills G.H., et al. Performance of breathing filters under wet conditions: a laboratory evaluation. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2005;94:675–682.

Wilkes A.R. Breathing system filters. British Journal of Anaesthesia CEPD Reviews. 2002;2:151–154.

Wilkes A.R., Malan C.A., Hall J.E. The effect of flow on the filtration performance of paediatric breathing system filters. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:71–76.

MCQs

In the following lists, which of the statements (a) to (e) are true?

1. Nebulizers:

2. Humidity:

3. Bacterial and viral filters:

4. Hot water bath humidifiers:

5. Heat exchange humidifiers:

6. Which of the following statements are true:

Answers

1. Nebulizers:

2. Humidity:

3. Bacterial and viral filters:

4. Hot water bath humidifiers:

5. Heat exchange humidifiers:

6. Which of the following statements are true:

Share this: