Head and Neck

Published on 13/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 3 (2 votes)

This article have been viewed 5980 times

Chapter 14

Head and Neck

Among the earliest vertebrates, the cranial region consisted of two principal components: (1) a chondrocranium, associated with the brain and the major sense organs (nose, eye, ear); and (2) a viscerocranium, a series of branchial (pharyngeal) arches associated with the oral region and the pharynx (Fig. 14.1A). As vertebrates became more complex, the contributions of the neural crest to the head became much more prominent, and the face and many dermal (intramembranously formed) bones of the skull (dermocranium) were added. With the early evolution of the face, the most anterior of the branchial arches underwent a transformation to form the upper and lower jaws and two of the middle ear bones, the malleus and the incus. Along with an increase in complexity of the face (Fig. 14.1B) came a corresponding increase in complexity of the forebrain (telencephalon and diencephalon). From structural and molecular aspects, the rostral (anteriormost) part of the head shows distinctly different characteristics from the pharyngeal region, as follows:

1. The pharyngeal region and hindbrain are highly segmented (see Fig. 14.3), whereas segmentation is less evident in the forebrain and rostral part of the head.

2. Structural segmentation in the pharyngeal region is associated with complex segmental patterns of gene expression (see Fig. 11.12).

3. Formation of the forebrain and associated structures of the rostral part of the head depends on the actions of specific genes (e.g., Lim1 [see Fig. 5.9], Emx1, Emx2, Otx1, and Otx2) and inductive signaling by the prechordal mesoderm or anterior visceral endoderm.

4. Much of the connective tissue and skeleton of the rostral (phylogenetically newer) part of the head is derived from the neural crest. The anterior end of the notochord, terminating at the hypophysis, constitutes the boundary between the mesodermally derived chondrocranium and the more rostral neural crest–derived chondrocranium. Neural crest cells are also prominent contributors to the ventral part of the pharyngeal region.

In previous chapters, the development of certain components of the head (e.g., the nervous system, neural crest, bones of the skull) is detailed. The first part of this chapter provides an integrated view of early craniofacial development to show how the major components are interrelated. The remainder of the chapter concentrates on the development of the face, pharynx, and pharyngeal arch system. Clinical Correlations 14.1 and 14.2, which appear later in the chapter, present malformations associated with the head and neck.

Early Development of the Head and Neck

Development of the head and neck begins early in embryonic life and continues until the cessation of postnatal growth in the late teens. Cephalization begins with the rapid expansion of the rostral end of the neural plate. Very early, the future brain is the dominant component of the craniofacial region. Beneath the brain, the face, which does not take shape until later in embryogenesis, is represented by the stomodeum (Fig. 14.2). In the early embryo, the stomodeum is sealed off from the primitive gut by the oropharyngeal membrane, which breaks down by the end of the first embryonic month (see Fig. 6.23). Surrounding the stomodeum are several tissue prominences that constitute the building blocks of the face (see Fig. 14.6). In keeping with its origin from the anterior neural ridge and its later serving as the tissue of origin of Rathke’s pouch, the ectoderm of the oropharyngeal membrane is first characterized by its expression of the homeodomain transcription factor Pitx-2. In the rostral midline is the frontonasal prominence, which is populated by mesenchymal cells derived from forebrain and some midbrain neural crest. On either side of the frontonasal prominence, ectodermal nasal placodes, which arose from the anterior neural ridge (see p. 95), develop into horseshoe-shaped structures, each consisting of a nasomedial process, also derived from forebrain neural crest, and a nasolateral process, derived from midbrain neural crest. Farther caudally, the stomodeum is bounded by maxillary and mandibular processes, which are also filled with neural crest–derived mesenchyme.

The future cervical region is dominated by the pharyngeal apparatus, consisting of a series of pharyngeal pouches, arches, and clefts. Many components of the face, ears, and glands of the head and neck arise from the pharyngeal region. Also prominent are the paired ectodermal placodes (see Fig. 13.1), which form much of the sensory tissue of the cranial region.

Tissue Components and Segmentation of Early Craniofacial Region

The early craniofacial region consists of a massive neural tube beneath which lie the notochord and a ventrally situated pharynx (see Fig. 14.2). The pharynx is surrounded by a series of pharyngeal arches. Many of the tissue components of the head and neck are organized segmentally. Figure 14.3 illustrates the segmentation of the tissue components of the head. As discussed in earlier chapters, distinct patterns of expression of certain homeobox-containing genes are associated with morphological segmentation in some cranial tissues, particularly the central nervous system (see Fig. 11.12). The chain of events between segmental patterns of gene expression and the appearance of morphological segmentation in parts of the cranial region remains incompletely understood.

Fundamental Organization of the Pharyngeal Region

Because many components of the face are derived from the pharyngeal region, an understanding of the basic organization of this region is important. In a 1-month-old embryo, the pharyngeal part of the foregut contains four lateral pairs of endodermally lined outpocketings called pharyngeal pouches and an unpaired ventral midline diverticulum, the thyroid primordium (Fig. 14.4). If the contours of the ectodermal covering over the pharyngeal region are followed, bilateral pairs of inpocketings called pharyngeal grooves, which almost make contact with the lateralmost extent of the pharyngeal pouches, are seen (see Fig. 14.4C).

Alternating with the pharyngeal grooves and pouches are paired masses of mesenchyme called pharyngeal (branchial) arches. Central to each pharyngeal arch is a prominent artery called an aortic arch, which extends from the ventral to the dorsal aorta (see Chapter 17 and Fig. 14.2). The mesenchyme of the pharyngeal arches is of dual origin. The mesenchyme of the incipient musculature originates from mesoderm, specifically the somitomeres. Much of the remaining pharyngeal arch mesenchyme, especially that of the ventral part, is derived from the neural crest, whereas mesoderm makes various contributions to the dorsal pharyngeal arch mesenchyme.

Establishing the Pattern of the Craniofacial Region

Establishment of the fundamental structural pattern of the craniofacial region is a complex process that involves interactions among numerous embryonic tissues. Major players are as follows: the neural tube, which acts as a signaling center and gives rise to the cranial neural crest; the paraxial mesoderm; the endoderm of the pharynx; and the cranial ectoderm.

Very early in development, the cranial neural tube becomes segmented on the basis of molecular instructions, based largely on Hox gene expression (see Fig. 11.12), and this coding spills over into the neural crest cells that leave the neural tube (see Fig. 12.8). More recently, investigators have recognized that the pharyngeal endoderm also exerts a profound patterning influence on facial development. Patterning of the pharyngeal endoderm itself is heavily based on its exposure to retinoic acid. Formation of the first pharyngeal pouch does not require retinoic acid, but pharyngeal pouches 3 and 4 have an absolute requirement for retinoic acid, whereas pouch 2 needs some, but not so much, exposure to retinoic acid.

Formation of the pharyngeal arches depends on signals from the pharyngeal pouches. Even though neural crest cells are major contributors to the underlying tissues of the pharyngeal arches, experiments have shown that neural crest is not required for the formation or patterning of the pharyngeal arches. In almost all aspects of lower facial morphogenesis, the development of neural crest derivatives depends on signals from cranial ectoderm, but the ectoderm is prepatterned by signals (importantly fibroblast growth factor-8 [FGF-8]) emanating from the pharyngeal endoderm (Fig. 14.5A).

Development of individual pharyngeal arches depends on various sets of molecular instructions. The first arch, which forms the upper and the lower jaws, is not included in the overall Hox code that underlies development of the remainder of the arches and determines their anteroposterior identity (see Fig. 12.8). Within individual pharyngeal arches, a code based on the homeobox-containing Dlx genes heavily influences dorsoventral patterning (see p. 301). Other molecular influences also strongly affect patterning of aspects of pharyngeal arch development. A major force in the patterning of pharyngeal arch 1 is endothelin-1 (Edn-1), which is secreted by the ectoderm of the arches and combines with its receptor (Ednr) on migrating neural crest cells. Although expressed on all of the pharyngeal arches, Edn-1 exerts its most prominent effect on the development of the first arch through its effects on Dlx expression.

A prominent feature of the early developing face is the unpaired frontonasal prominence, which constitutes the rostralmost part of the face (see Fig. 14.6). Originating over the bulging forebrain, the frontonasal process is filled with cranial neural crest. These neural crest cells are targets of a signaling center in the overlying ectoderm, called the frontonasal ectodermal zone (see Fig. 14.5B). This signaling center, which itself is induced by sonic hedgehog (shh) emanating from the forebrain, is an area where dorsal ectodermal cells expressing FGF-8 confront ventral ectodermal cells, which express shh. This confluence of ectodermal signals acts on the underlying neural crest cells to shape the tip of the snout. Mammals and other species with broad faces have bilateral frontonasal ectodermal zones, located at the tips of the nasomedial processes (see Fig. 14.6). In birds, which have a narrow midface tapering into a beak, the two frontonasal ectodermal zones fuse into a single signaling center. In avian embryos, transplantation of the facial ectodermal zone into an ectopic region results in the formation of a second beak.

Cellular Migrations and Tissue Displacements in the Craniofacial Region

Early craniofacial development is characterized by several massive migrations and displacements of cells and tissues. The neural crest is the first tissue to exhibit such migratory behavior, with cells migrating from the nervous system even before closure of the cranial neural tube (see Chapter 12). Initially, segmental groups of neural crest cells are segregated, especially in the pharyngeal region (see Fig. 14.3). These populations of cells become confluent, however, during their migrations through the pharyngeal arches. Much of the detailed anatomy of the facial skeleton and musculature is based on the timing, location, and interactions of individual streams of neural crest and mesodermal cells. Recognition of this level of detail (which is beyond the scope of this text) is important in understanding the basis underlying many of the numerous varieties of facial clefts that are seen in pediatric surgical clinics.

The early cranial mesoderm consists mainly of the paraxial and prechordal mesoderm (see Fig. 14.3). Although the paraxial mesoderm rostral to the occipital somites has been traditionally considered to be subdivided into somitomeres (see Fig. 6-8), some embryologists now classify it as being unsegmented mesoderm (see Fig. 14.3). Mesenchymal cells originating in the paraxial mesoderm form the connective tissue and skeletal elements of the caudal part of the cranium and the dorsal part of the neck. Within the pharyngeal arches, cells from the paraxial mesoderm initially form a mesodermal core, which is surrounded by cranial neural crest cells (see Fig. 14.5A). Myogenic cells from paraxial mesoderm undergo extensive migrations to form the bulk of the muscles of the cranial region. Similar to their counterparts in the trunk and limbs, these myogenic cells become integrated with local connective tissue to form muscles. Another similarity with the trunk musculature is that morphogenetic control seems to reside within the connective tissue elements of the muscles, rather than in the myogenic cells themselves. In the face and ventral pharynx, this connective tissue is of neural crest origin.

The prechordal mesoderm, which emits important forebrain inductive signals in the early embryo, is a transient mass of cells located in the midline, rostral to the tip of the notochord. Although the fate of these cells is controversial, some investigators believe that myoblasts contributing to the extraocular muscles take origin from these cells. On their way to the eye, cells of the prechordal mesoderm may pass through the rostralmost paraxial mesoderm.

The lateral plate mesoderm is not well defined in the cranial region. Transplantation experiments have shown that it gives rise to endothelial and smooth muscle cells and, at least in birds, to some portions of the laryngeal cartilages.

Another set of tissue displacements important in the cranial region is the joining of cells derived from the ectodermal placodes with cells of the neural crest to form parts of sense organs and ganglia of certain cranial nerves (see Fig. 13.1).

Development of the Facial Region

Formation of the Face and Jaws

Development of the face and jaws is a complex three-dimensional process involving the patterning, outgrowth, fusion, and molding of various tissue masses. The forebrain acts as a mechanical substrate and a signaling center for early facial development, and the stomodeum serves as a morphological point of reference. The lower face (maxillary region and lower jaw) is phylogenetically derived from a greatly expanded first pharyngeal arch. Much of the mesenchyme of the face is neural crest, originating from the forebrain to the first two rhombomeres. Each of the tissue components of the early face is the product of a unique set of morphogenetic determinants and growth signals, and increasing evidence indicates that specific sets of molecular signals control their development along the proximodistal and the rostrocaudal axes.

At a higher level, the building blocks of the face relate to one another in highly specific ways, and clues to their origins and relationships can be derived by examination of their blood supply. Disturbances at this level regularly result in the production of craniofacial anomalies, and an understanding of the fundamental elements of facial morphogenesis is crucial to rational surgical approaches to these malformations.

Structures of the face and jaws originate from several primordia that surround the stomodeal depression of a 4- to 5-week-old human embryo (Fig. 14.6). These primordia consist of the following: an unpaired frontonasal prominence; paired nasomedial and nasolateral processes, which are components of the horseshoe-shaped olfactory (nasal) primordia; and paired maxillary processes and mandibular prominences, both components of the first pharyngeal arches. The upper jaw contains a mixed population of neural crest cells derived from the forebrain and midbrain, whereas the lower jaw contains mesenchymal cells derived from midbrain and hindbrain (rhombomeres 1 and 2) neural crest. The specific morphology of facial skeletal elements is determined by signals passed from the pharyngeal endoderm to the facial ectoderm and then to the neural crest precursors of the facial bones. Narrow zones of pharyngeal endoderm control the morphogenesis of specific portions of the skeleton of the lower face. FGF-8 signaling from the facial ectoderm plays a key role in patterning of the facial skeleton.

Another factor that strongly influences facial form is the responsiveness of the various facial processes to Wnts. In many developing structures, Wnt signaling stimulates cellular proliferation that increases the mass of that structure. In facial development, species with an elongated midface (e.g., the beak of birds) have a midline zone of Wnt responsiveness within the frontonasal process. Other species (e.g., humans) that have flat but broad faces have Wnt-responsive regions in the maxillary and mandibular processes, thus supporting lateral growth in the face.

The frontonasal process is a prominent structure in the earliest phases of facial development, and its formation is the result of an exquisitely sensitive signaling system that begins with the synthesis of retinoic acid in a localized region of ectoderm opposite the forebrain and continues with the action of shh produced by the ventral forebrain. The action of shh, through the mediation of the most rostral wave of neural crest cells, underlies the establishment of the frontonasal ectodermal zone, located at the tips of the nasomedial processes (see p. 298). The signaling molecules (FGF-8 and shh) emanating from this zone stimulate cell proliferation in the neural crest mesenchyme of the frontonasal process. In the absence of such signaling, cell death in the region increases, and cell proliferation decreases, resulting in various midfacial defects (see Clinical Correlation 14.1). Retinoic acid is unusual in that both deficiencies and excess amounts can cause very similar defects. From 4 to 5 weeks, the frontonasal process is a dominant structure of the early face (see Fig. 14.6), but with subsequent growth of the maxillary process and the nasomedial and nasolateral processes, it recedes from the oral region. The nasolateral process develops as a result of FGF signaling emanating from the nasal pit.

The maxillary and mandibular processes have traditionally been considered to be derivatives of the first pharyngeal arch. More recent research has suggested that although some of the cells that form the maxillary process arise from the first arch, many mesenchymal cells of the maxillary process are not first-arch derivatives, but instead come from other areas of cranial neural crest. How these cells are integrated into a unified structure and what controls their specific morphogenesis remain to be determined.

As with the limb buds, outgrowth of the frontonasal prominence and the maxillary and mandibular processes depends on mesenchymal-ectodermal interactions. In contrast to the limb, however, the signaling system (FGF and shh) is concentrated in the apical ectoderm of these processes, where it may act as a morphogenetic organizer and a stimulus for mesenchymal outgrowth of the facial primordia. The homeobox-containing gene Msx1 is expressed in the rapidly proliferating mesenchyme at the tips of the facial primordia. The parallel with expression of Msx1 in the subectodermal region of the limb (see p. 200) suggests that similar mechanisms operate in outgrowing limb and facial primordia. Hox genes are not expressed in the first arch, and the presence of Otx-2 distally, coupled with the absence of Hox proximally, provides the molecular basis for the development of the first arch.

The subdivision of the first arch into maxillary and mandibular regions is controlled to a large extent by endothelin-1. Expressed at the distal (ventral) tip of the arch, endothelin-1 effectively represses the local expression of genes, such as Dlx-1/2, that are heavily involved in formation of the proximal maxilla. Distally, endothelin-1 promotes the expression of distal genes, such as Dlx-5/6 and their downstream targets (Hand-2 and Goosecoid), which pattern the mandible. At an intermediate dorsoventral level within the first arch, endothelin-1 stimulates the expression of Barx-1, which is a prime determinant of the formation of the mandibular joint. When endothelin-1 is mutated or inactivated, the mandible becomes transformed into a structure resembling the maxilla. If endothelin-1 is overexpressed in the proximal part of the first arch, the future maxilla becomes transformed into a mandible. This effect is transmitted through the activation of Dlx-5/6 (see later). In the proximal (dorsal) part of the first arch, the influence of endothelin-1 is reduced, and active patterning genes lay the foundation for the formation of both the maxilla and the middle ear bones (malleus, incus, and tympanic ring).

Despite the relatively featureless appearance of the early mandibular process (first pharyngeal arch), the mediolateral (oral-aboral) and proximodistal axes are tightly specified. This recognition has considerable clinical significance because increasing numbers of genetic mutants are recognized to affect only certain regions of the arch, such as the absence of distal (adult midline) versus proximal structures. The medial (oral) region of the mandibular process, which seems to be the driver of mandibular growth, responds to local epithelial signals (FGF-8) by stimulating proliferation of the underlying mesenchyme through the mediation of Msx-1, similar to the subectodermal region of the limb bud. Growth of the jaws is influenced by various growth factors, especially the bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), which, at different stages, are produced in either the ectoderm or the mesenchyme and can have strikingly different effects. Experiments on avian embryos have shown that increasing the expression of BMP-4 in first-arch mesenchyme results in the formation of a much more massive beak than that of normal embryos.

Proximodistal organization of the arch is reflected by nested expression patterns of the transcription factor Dlx (the mammalian equivalent of distalless in Drosophila) along the arch. The paralogues Dlx-3 and Dlx-7 (Dlx-4) are expressed most distally, expression of Dlx-5 and Dlx-6 extends more proximally, and expression of Dlx-1 and Dlx-2 extends most proximally. In mice, only Dlx-1 and Dlx-2 are expressed in the maxillary process. Although mutants of individual Dlx genes produce minor abnormalities, mice in which Dlx-5 and Dlx-6 have been knocked out develop with a homeotic transformation of the distal lower jaws into upper jaws. It seems that Dlx-5 and Dlx-6, functioning downstream of endothelin-1, are selector genes that control the rostrocaudal identity of the distal segments of the first pharyngeal arch.

Through differential growth between 4 and 8 weeks (see Fig. 14.6), the nasomedial and maxillary processes become more prominent and ultimately fuse to form the upper lip and jaw (Fig. 14.7). As this is occurring, the frontonasal prominence, which was a prominent tissue bordering the stomodeal area in the 4- and 5-week-old embryo, is displaced as the two nasomedial processes merge. The merged nasomedial processes form the intermaxillary segment, which is a precursor for (1) the philtrum of the lip, (2) the premaxillary component of the upper jaw, and (3) the primary palate.

Between the maxillary process and the nasal primordium (nasolateral process) is a nasolacrimal groove (naso-optic furrow) that extends to the developing eye (see Fig. 14.6). The ectoderm of the floor of the nasolacrimal groove thickens to form a solid epithelial cord, which detaches from the groove. The epithelial cord undergoes canalization and forms the nasolacrimal duct and, near the eye, the lacrimal sac. The nasolacrimal duct extends from the medial corner of the eye to the nasal cavity (inferior meatus) and, in postnatal life, acts as a drain for lacrimal fluid. This connection explains why people can have a runny nose when crying. Meanwhile, the expanding nasomedial process fuses with the maxillary process, and over the region of the nasolacrimal groove, the nasolateral process merges with the superficial region of the maxillary process. The region of fusion of the nasomedial and maxillary processes is marked by an epithelial seam, called the nasal fin. Mesenchyme soon penetrates the nasal fin, and the result is a continuous union between the nasomedial and maxillary processes.

The lower jaw is formed in a simpler manner. The bilateral mandibular prominences enlarge, and their medial components merge in the midline, to form the point of the lower jaw. The midline dimple that is seen in the lower jaw of some individuals is a reflection of variation in the degree of merging of the mandibular prominences. A prominent cartilaginous rod called Meckel’s cartilage differentiates within the lower jaw (see Fig. 14.36D). Derived from neural crest cells of the first pharyngeal arch, Meckel’s cartilage forms the basis around which membrane bone (which forms the definitive skeleton of the lower jaw) is laid down. Experimental evidence indicates that the rodlike shape of Meckel’s cartilage is related to the inhibition of further chondrogenesis by the surrounding ectoderm. If the ectoderm is removed around Meckel’s cartilage, large masses of cartilage form instead of a rod. These properties are similar to the inhibitory interactions between ectoderm and chondrogenesis in the limb bud. A later-acting influence in growth of the lower jaw is the planar cell polarity pathway, which influences outgrowth of Meckel’s cartilage. If this pathway is disrupted, the mandible will not develop to its normal length.

Shortly after the basic facial structures take shape, they are invaded by mesodermal cells associated with the first and second pharyngeal arches. These cells form the muscles of mastication (first-arch derivatives, which are innervated by cranial nerve V) and the muscles of facial expression (second-arch derivatives, which are innervated by cranial nerve VII). At the level of individual muscles, highly coordinated spatiotemporal relationships between mesodermal and neural crest cells are very important in the determination of muscle attachments and the overall shape of the muscles.

Although the basic structure of the face is established between 4 and 8 weeks, changes in the proportionality of the various regions continue until well after birth. In particular, the midface remains underdeveloped during embryogenesis and early postnatal life.

Temporomandibular Joint and Its Relationship with the Jaw Joint of Lower Vertebrates

Of considerable clinical importance and evolutionary interest is the temporomandibular joint, which represents the hinge between the mandibular condyle and the squamous part of the temporal bone. The temporomandibular joint, which phylogenetically appeared with the evolution of mammals, is a complex synovial joint surrounded by a capsule and containing an articular disk between the two bones. Based on the early expression of Barx-1, this joint is formed late during development, first appearing as mesenchymal condensations associated with the temporal bone and mandibular condyle during the seventh week of development. The articular disk and capsule begin to take shape a week later, and the actual joint cavity forms between weeks 9 and 11.

In lower vertebrates, the jaw opens and closes on a hinge between cartilaginous portions of the mandibular process—the articular bone in the lower jaw and the quadrate bone in the upper jaw, both derivatives of Meckel’s cartilage. During phylogenesis, the distal membranous bone (the dentary bone) associated with Meckel’s cartilage increased in prominence as the jaw musculature became more massive. The dentary bone of contemporary mammals and humans constitutes most of the lower jaw, and Meckel’s cartilage is seen only as a prominent cartilaginous rod within the forming jaw complex during the late embryonic stage of development.

In mammals, over many millions of years, the original jaw-opening joint became less prominent and was incorporated into the middle ear as the malleus (derivative of articular bone of the lower jaw) and the incus (derivative of the ancestral quadrate bone in the skull). The incus connects with the stapes (a derivative of the second pharyngeal arch). The tympanic ring, a neural crest–derived bone that surrounds and supports the tympanic membrane, is derived from the angular bone, one of the first-arch membrane bones that overlies the proximal part of Meckel’s cartilage.

Formation of the Palate

The early embryo possesses a common oronasal cavity, but in humans the palate forms between 6 and 10 weeks to separate the oral from the nasal cavity. The palate is derived from three primordia: an unpaired median palatine process and a pair of lateral palatine processes (Figs. 14.8 and 14.9).

The median palatine process is an ingrowth from the newly merged nasomedial processes. As it grows, the median palatine process forms a triangular bony structure called the primary palate. In postnatal life, the skeletal component of the primary palate is referred to as the premaxillary component of the maxilla. The four upper incisor teeth arise from this structure (Fig. 14.10).

Formation of the palate involves (1) growth of the palatal shelves, (2) their elevation, (3) their fusion, and (4) removal of the epithelial seam at the site of fusion. The lateral palatine processes, which are the precursors of the secondary palate, first appear as outgrowths of the maxillary processes during the sixth week. At first, they grow downward on either side of the tongue (Fig. 14.11). Similar to other facial primordia, outgrowth of the palatal shelves involves ectodermal-mesenchymal interactions and specific growth factors. FGF-10 produced in the mesenchyme of the forming palatal shelf is bound to an FGF receptor in the ectoderm (Fig. 14.12). This process stimulates the release of shh from the ectoderm. Shh causes the release of BMP-2 in the mesenchyme. BMP-2 and Msx-1, which interacts with BMP-4, stimulate proliferation of the mesenchymal cells of the palatal shelf and its resultant growth. During week 7, the lateral palatine processes (palatal shelves) dramatically dislodge from their positions alongside the tongue and become oriented perpendicularly to the maxillary processes. The apices of these processes meet in the midline and begin to fuse.

Despite many years of investigation, the mechanism underlying the elevation of the palatine shelves remains obscure. Swelling of the extracellular matrix of the palatal shelves seems to impart a resiliency that allows them to approximate one another shortly after they become dislodged from along the tongue. Research suggests that the rapid closure of the palatal shelves is accomplished by the flowing of the internal tissues, rather than by a reaction that approximates the closure of swinging doors.

Another structure involved in formation of the palate is the nasal septum (see Figs. 14.8 and 14.11). This midline structure, which is a downgrowth from the frontonasal prominence, reaches the level of the palatal shelves when the palatal shelves fuse to form the definitive secondary palate. Rostrally, the nasal septum is continuous with the primary palate.

At the gross level, the palatal shelves fuse in the midline, but rostrally they also join the primary palate. The midline point of the fusion of the primary palate with the two palatal shelves is marked by the incisive foramen (see Fig. 14.10).

Because of its clinical importance, fusion of the palatal shelves has been investigated intensively. When the palatal shelves first make midline contact, each is covered throughout by a homogeneous epithelium. During the process of fusion, however, the midline epithelial seam disappears. The epithelium on the nasal surface of the palate differentiates into a ciliated columnar type, whereas the epithelium takes on a stratified squamous form on the oral surface of the palate. Significant developmental questions include the following:

The disappearance of the midline epithelial seam after the approximation of the palatal shelves involves several fundamental developmental processes (Fig. 14.13). Some of the epithelial cells at the fusion seam undergo apoptosis and disappear. Others may migrate out from the plane of fusion and become inserted into the epithelial lining of the oral cavity. Still other epithelial cells undergo a morphological transformation into mesenchymal cells. Transforming growth factor-β3 (TGF-β3) is expressed by the ectodermal cells of the distal rim of the palatal shelves just before fusion and loses prominence shortly thereafter. It plays an important role in stimulating apoptosis of the epithelial cells at the fusion seam. In TGF-β3–mutant mice, the lateral palatal shelves approximate in the midline, but the epithelial seam fails to disappear, and the mice develop isolated cleft palate.

Experiments involving the in vitro culture of a single palatal shelf of several species have shown clearly that all aspects of epithelial differentiation (cell death in the midline and different pathways of differentiation on the oral and nasal surfaces) can occur in the absence of contact with the opposite palatal shelf. These different pathways of differentiation are not intrinsic to the regional epithelia, but they are mediated by the underlying neural crest–derived mesenchyme. The mechanism of this regional specification of the epithelium remains poorly understood. According to one model, the underlying mesenchyme produces growth factors that influence the production and regional distribution of extracellular matrix molecules (e.g., type IX collagen). The way these events are received and interpreted by the epithelial cells is unknown.

Formation of the Nose and Olfactory Apparatus

The human olfactory apparatus first becomes visible at the end of the first month as a pair of thickened ectodermal nasal placodes located on the frontal aspect of the head (Fig. 14.14A). Similar to the formation of the lens placodes, the formation of the nasal placodes requires the expression of Pax-6 and the action of retinoids produced in the forebrain. In the absence of Pax-6 expression, neither the nasal placodes nor the lens placodes form. The nasal placodes originate from the anterolateral edge of the neural plate before its closure.

Soon after their formation, the nasal placodes form a surface depression (the nasal pits) surrounded by horseshoe-shaped elevations of mesenchymal tissue with the open ends facing the future mouth (see Fig. 14.6). The two limbs of the mesenchymal elevations are the nasomedial and nasolateral processes. Formation of the thickened nasal processes depends on the retinoid-stimulated production of FGF-8, which stimulates proliferation of the mesenchymal cells within the nasal processes. The source of these retinoids is the epithelium of the nasal pit itself. Meanwhile, production of retinoids by the forebrain diminishes. As a consequence, the frontonasal prominence, which depends on forebrain retinoids for supporting proliferation of its mesenchymal cells, is reduced. As the nasal primordia merge toward the midline during weeks 6 and 7, the nasomedial processes form the tip and crest of the nose along with part of the nasal septum, and the nasolateral processes form the wings (alae) of the nose. The receding frontonasal process contributes to part of the bridge of the nose.

Meanwhile, the nasal pits continue to deepen toward the oral cavity and form substantial cavities themselves (see Fig. 14.14). By image weeks, only a thin oronasal membrane separates the oral cavity from the nasal cavity. The oronasal membrane soon breaks down, thereby making the nasal cavities continuous with the oral cavity through openings behind the primary palate called nasal choanae (see Fig. 14.9). Shortly after breakdown of the oronasal membrane, however, the outer part of the nasal cavity becomes blocked with a plug of epithelial cells, which persists until the end of the fourth month. With the fusion of the lateral palatal shelves, the nasal cavity is considerably lengthened and ultimately communicates with the upper pharynx.

Similar to the other major sensory organs of the head, the epithelium of each nasal pit induces the surrounding neural crest mesenchyme to form a cartilaginous capsule around it. In a three-dimensionally complex manner, the medial parts of the nasal capsules combine with more centrally derived deep neural crest mesenchyme to form the midline nasal septum and ethmoid bones. The lateral region of the nasal capsule forms the nasal bones. During the third month, shelflike structures called nasal conchae form from the ethmoid bones on the lateral wall of the nasal cavity. These structures increase the surface area available for conditioning the air within the nasal cavity. Late in fetal life and for several years after birth, the paranasal sinuses form as outgrowths from the walls of the nasal cavities. The size and shape of these structures have a significant impact on the form of the face during its postnatal growth period.

At 6 to 7 weeks, a pair of epithelial ingrowths can be seen in each side of the nasal septum near the palate. Developing as invaginations from the medial portion of the nasal placode, these diverticula, known as vomeronasal organs (see Fig. 14.11B), reach a maximum size of about 6 to 8 mm at around the sixth fetal month and then begin to regress, leaving small cystic structures. In most mammals and many other vertebrates, the vomeronasal organs, which are lined with a modified olfactory epithelium, remain prominent and are involved in the olfaction of food in the mouth or sexual olfactory stimuli (e.g., pheromones).

The dorsalmost epithelium of the nasal pits undergoes differentiation as a highly specialized olfactory epithelium (see Fig. 14.14). Differentiation of the olfactory organ and the vomeronasal organ requires the action of FGF-8, which is produced in a signaling zone that surrounds the nasal pit. Beginning in the embryonic period and continuing throughout life, the olfactory epithelium is able to form primitive sensory bipolar neurons, which send axonal projections toward the olfactory bulb of the brain. Preceding axonal ingrowth, some cells break free from this epithelium and migrate toward the brain. Some of these cells may synthesize a substrate for the ingrowth of the olfactory axons. Other cells migrating from the olfactory placode (specifically, the vomeronasal primordium) synthesize luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone and migrate to the hypothalamus, the site of synthesis and release of this hormone in adults. The embryonic origin of these cells in the olfactory placode helps to explain the basis for Kallmann’s syndrome, which is characterized by anosmia and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Cells of the olfactory placode also form supporting (sustentacular) cells and glandular cells in the olfactory region of the nose. Physiological evidence shows that the olfactory epithelium is capable of some function in late fetal life, but full olfactory function is not attained until after birth.

Formation of the Salivary Glands

Starting in the sixth week, the salivary glands originate as solid, ridgelike thickenings of the oral epithelium (Fig. 14.15). Extensive epithelial shifts in the oral cavity make it difficult to determine the germ layer origins of the salivary gland epithelium. The parotid glands are probably derived from ectoderm, whereas the submandibular and sublingual glands are thought to be derived from endoderm.

As with other glandular structures associated with the digestive tract, the development of salivary glands depends on a continuing series of epitheliomesenchymal interactions. Branching morphogenesis of the salivary glands depends heavily on shh signaling, acting on FGFs. In contrast to most other glandular structures, however, in which epithelially produced shh acts on the underlying mesenchyme, in the salivary glands the entire sequence of shh signaling and of FGF response occurs within the epithelium. The basal lamina that surrounds the early epithelial lobular ingrowths differs in composition, depending on the growth potential of the region. Around the stalk and in clefts, the basal lamina contains types I and IV collagen and a basement membrane-1 proteoglycan. These components are not found in the regions of the lobules that undergo further growth. Under the influence of the surrounding mesenchyme, the basal lamina in growing regions loses the collagens and proteoglycans that are associated with stable structures (e.g., stalks, clefts).

In addition to alterations in the basal lamina, branching is associated with the local contraction of ordered microfilaments within the apices of epithelial cells at the branch points. Continued growth at the tips of lobules of the glands is supported by high levels of mitotic activity of the epithelium and the deposition of newly synthesized glycosaminoglycans in the area. During organogenesis, the parasympathetic innervation, acting through acetylcholine secretion, maintains the population of epithelial progenitor cells. In its absence, the amount of budding of epithelial lobules is dramatically reduced. The structural and functional differentiation of the epithelium of the salivary gland continues throughout fetal life.

Clinical Correlation 14.1 presents malformations of the face and oral regions.

Clinical Correlation 14.1   Malformations of the Face and Oral Region

Cleft Lip and Palate

Cleft lip and cleft palate are common malformations, with an incidence of approximately 1 in 1000 births (cleft lip) and 1 in 2500 births (cleft palate). Numerous combinations and degrees of severity exist, ranging from a unilateral cleft lip to a bilateral cleft lip associated with a fully cleft palate.

Structurally, cleft lip results from the lack of fusion of the maxillary and nasomedial processes. In the most complete form of the defect, the entire premaxillary segment is separated from both maxillae, with resulting bilateral clefts that run through the lip and the upper jaw between the lateral incisors and the canine teeth (Fig. 14.16). The point of convergence of the two clefts is the incisive foramen (Fig. 14.17B). The premaxillary segment commonly protrudes past the normal facial contours when viewed from the side. The mechanism frequently underlying cleft lip is hypoplasia of the maxillary process that prevents contact between the maxillary and nasomedial processes from being established.

Cleft palate results from incomplete or absent fusion of the palatal shelves (see Figs. 14.16B and 14.17). The extent of palatal clefting ranges from involvement of the entire length of the palate to something as minor as a bifid uvula. As with cleft lip, cleft palate is usually multifactorial. Some chromosomal syndromes (e.g., trisomy 13) are characterized by a high incidence of clefts. In other cases, cleft lip and cleft palate can be linked to the action of a chemical teratogen (e.g., anticonvulsant medications). Experiments on mice have shown that the incidence of cleft palate after exposure to a dose of cortisone is strongly related to the genetic background of the mouse. In humans, mutations of MSX1 are strongly associated with nonsyndromic cleft palate. The higher female incidence of cleft palate may be related to the occurrence of fusion of the palatal shelves in female embryos about 1 week later than in male embryos, thus prolonging the susceptible period.

The genetic and molecular basis of normal palate closure is complex. Even closure of the anterior and posterior parts of the palate operates under different combinations of molecular interactions. Consequently, more than 300 genetic syndromes include cleft palate as part of the spectrum of disease.

Macrostomia (Lateral Facial Cleft)

An even rarer condition called macrostomia (Fig. 14.18B) results from hypoplasia or poor merging of the maxillary and mandibular processes. As the name implies, this condition manifests as a very large mouth on one or both sides. In severe cases, the cleft can reach almost to the ears.

Holoprosencephaly

Holoprosencephaly includes a broad spectrum of defects, all based on defective formation of the forebrain (prosencephalon) and structures whose normal formation depends on influences from the forebrain. This condition has been estimated to be present in up to 1 in 250 of all embryos and 1 in 10,000 live births. The defect arises in early pregnancy when the forebrain is taking shape, and the brain defects usually involve archencephalic structures (e.g., the olfactory system). Because of the influence of the brain on surrounding structures, especially the cranial base, primary defects of the forebrain often manifest externally as facial malformations, typically a reduction in tissue of the frontonasal process.

In extreme cases, holoprosencephaly can take the form of cyclopia (see Fig. 8.18), in which the near absence of upper facial and midfacial tissue results in a convergence and fusion of the optic primordia. Reduction defects of the nose can also be components of this condition. The nose can be either absent or represented by a tubular proboscis (or two such structures), sometimes even located above the eye (see Fig. 8.18). Midline defects of the upper lip can also be attributed to holoprosencephaly (see Fig. 14.18C).

The root cause of holoprosencephaly occurs very early in embryonic development, with disturbances in the ability of the prechordal plate and anterior endoderm to secrete sonic hedgehog (shh) and other factors required for induction and early development of the ventral forebrain. In their absence, the single optic field either does not split or splits incompletely, and ventral forebrain structures do not develop. This is also reflected in a reduced rostral neural crest, which provides the cellular basis for the formation of most midface structures. Even earlier in development, disturbances in bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) levels, often caused by imbalances in BMP inhibitors, can influence early formation of the forebrain and lead to holoprosencephaly.

Many cases of holoprosencephaly (e.g., Meckel’s syndrome, which includes midline cleft lip, olfactory bulb absence or hypoplasia, and nasal abnormalities) can be attributed to genetic causes. Meckel’s syndrome is an autosomal recessive condition. Several types of hereditary holoprosencephaly result from mutations of the shh gene, which normally induces the formation of several midline structures in the forebrain. Exposure to an excess of retinoic acid, which causes misregulation of genes in the shh pathway, also causes holoprosencephaly in laboratory animals and possibly in humans. Most cases of holoprosencephaly seem to be multifactorial, although maternal consumption of alcohol during the first month of pregnancy is suspected to be a leading cause of this condition. One percent to 2% of infants born to diabetic mothers may develop some degree of holoprosencephaly. Trisomies of chromosomes 13 and 18 are commonly associated with holoprosencephaly.

Formation of the Teeth

A tooth is a highly specialized extracellular matrix consisting of two principal components—enamel and dentin—each secreted by a different embryonic epithelium. Tooth development is a highly orchestrated process involving intimate interactions between the epithelia that produce the dentin and enamel. Extending a common theme of development into the macroscopic dimension, teeth undergo an isoform transition, with the postnatal replacement of the deciduous teeth by their permanent adult counterparts.

Patterning of the Dentition

Each human tooth has a distinctive morphology, and each type of tooth forms in a characteristic location. For many years, virtually nothing was known about the patterning of the dentition, but analysis of certain types of genetically modified mice has provided some concrete clues to the molecular basis of dental patterning. Both the dental field overall and the patterning of the dentition take shape very early in craniofacial development, before any overt indication of tooth formation. The expression of Pitx-2 (a bicoid-related transcription factor; see Fig. 4.1) outlines first the entire ectodermal dental field, and later the epithelium of the individual tooth germs. The homeobox-containing genes Dlx-1 and Dlx-2 are expressed in the maxillary arch and in the proximal part of the mandibular arch. When both these genes are knocked out in mice, the upper jaw develops without molar teeth, although molars develop in the lower jaws. The incisor teeth in both jaws develop normally. Another homeobox-containing gene, Barx-1, is induced by FGF-8 in proximal ectoderm of the mandibular process, and in the formation of molar teeth in knockouts it may compensate for the absence of Dlx-1 and Dlx-2 in the lower jaw. FGF-8 acts proximally to restrict Barx-1 and Dlx-2 to guide the molar-producing domain, and BMP-4 acts distally to activate Msx-1 and Msx-2 in guiding the formation of incisor teeth.

Not only the location, but also the type of tooth is under tight developmental control. The difference in morphology between an incisor tooth, possessing a single cusp, and a molar tooth, which contains several cusps, is related to the number of enamel knots (see later) in the developing tooth. A striking example of the molecular control of dental patterning is the conversion of incisor teeth to molars in mice. In the distal part of the mandibular arch, ectodermal BMP-4 signals normally repress the expression of Barx-1, but when BMP-4 signaling is inhibited by the implantation of noggin beads, Barx-1 expression is induced in the dental mesenchyme, and the developing incisor teeth are transformed into molars. The transcription factor Islet-1 is expressed only in the oral surface ectoderm in the area where incisors will form. In contrast, Pitx-1 is expressed only in the molar region of the mandibular mesenchyme where it acts upstream of Barx-1.

Mammals have only a single row of teeth in each jaw. This is controlled by two overlapping gradients of opposite polarity along the lingual-buccal axis (Fig. 14.20). On the buccal side of the jaw, a high concentration of BMP-4 stimulates the expression of Msx-1 in the dental mesenchyme in the normal process of tooth development, thus accounting for the development of the normal teeth. On the lingual side of the jaw, a high concentration of the transcription factor Osr-2 (the mammalian equivalent of the Drosophila pair-rule gene odd skipped; see Fig. 4.1) inhibits the BMP-Msx axis and consequently tooth formation in that area. When Osr-2 is inactivated, BMP-4–Msx-1 activity on the lingual side of the jaw is not inhibited, and supernumerary teeth form on the lingual side of the normal row of teeth (see Fig. 14.20B). Enhancing or inhibiting the function of many of the other genes involved in tooth development can also lead to the formation of supernumerary teeth, but these genes do not cause expansion of the entire dental field as does Osr-2.

Stages of Tooth Development

Tooth development begins with the migration of neural crest cells into the regions of the upper and lower jaws. The overlying oral ectoderm thickens into C-shaped bands (dental laminae) in the upper and lower jaws. The appearance of the dental laminae during the sixth week is the first manifestation of a series of ectodermal-mesenchymal interactions that continues until tooth formation is virtually completed.

Although each tooth has a specific time sequence and morphology of development, certain general developmental stages are common to all teeth (Fig. 14.21). As the dental lamina grows into the neural crest mesenchyme, epithelial primordia of the individual teeth begin to take shape as tooth buds. In keeping with their interactive mode of development, the tooth buds are associated with condensations of mesenchymal cells. The tooth bud soon expands, passing through a mushroom-shaped cap stage before entering the bell stage (see Fig. 14.21D).

By the bell stage, the tooth primordium already has a complex structure, even though it has not formed any components of the definitive tooth. The epithelial component, called the enamel organ, is still connected to the oral epithelium by an irregular stalk of dental lamina, which soon begins to degenerate. The enamel organ consists of an outer sheath of epithelium, a mesenchymelike stellate reticulum, and an inner epithelial ameloblast layer. Ameloblasts are the cells that begin to secrete the enamel of the tooth. The initial formation of ameloblasts depends on the actions of the transcription factor Tbx-1. Within the concave surface of the enamel organ is a condensation of neural crest mesenchyme called the dental papilla. Cells of the dental papilla opposite the ameloblast layer become transformed into columnar epithelial cells called odontoblasts (Fig. 14.22). These cells secrete the dentin of the tooth. Attached to the dental lamina close to the enamel organ is a small bud of the permanent tooth (see Fig. 14.21E and F). Although delayed, it goes through the same developmental stages as the deciduous tooth.

Late in the bell stage, the odontoblasts and ameloblasts begin to secrete precursors of dentin and enamel, beginning first at the future apex of the tooth. Over several months, the definitive form of the tooth takes shape (see Fig. 14.21). Meanwhile, a condensation of mesenchymal cells forms around the developing tooth. Cells of this structure, called the dental sac, produce specialized extracellular matrix components (cementum and the periodontal ligament) that provide the tooth with a firm attachment to the jaw. While these events are occurring, the tooth elongates and begins to erupt through the gums (gingiva).

Tissue Interactions in Tooth Development

Teeth are formed by a series of inductive interactions. Tissue recombination experiments have shown that the thickened ectoderm of the dental lamina initiates tooth formation. Early in development, dental ectoderm can induce nondental cranial neural crest mesenchyme to participate in the formation of a tooth, but predental neural crest mesenchyme cannot induce nondental ectoderm to form a tooth. Research suggests that the transcription factor Lef-1 may stimulate the predental surface ectoderm to secrete FGF-8, which induces the underlying mesenchyme to express Pax-9 (Fig. 14.23). In the absence of Pax-9 expression, tooth development does not proceed past the bud stage. BMP-2 and BMP-4, also produced by the surface ectoderm, inhibit the action of FGF-8. Investigators have suggested that such inhibition is the basis for the non–tooth-forming spaces between the developing teeth. More recent research has shown that lateral inhibition through the Delta/Notch system is also involved in dental spacing. Another characteristic transcription factor induced in the mesenchyme beneath the thickened dental lamina is Msx-1.

Slightly later in dental development, BMP-4, instead of functioning as an inhibitor, acts along with FGF-8 and shh to stimulate the mesenchyme of the tooth bud to express a variety of characteristic molecules, including the following: the transcription factors Msx-1, Msx-2, and EGR-1; the extracellular matrix molecules tenascin and syndecan; and BMP-4. If the overlying ectoderm is separated from the neural crest mesenchyme, the predental mesenchyme will not develop into a dental papilla, and a tooth will not form. The role of BMP-4 as an inducer was shown by adding a small bead soaked in BMP-4 to a small mass of cultured predental neural crest mesenchyme (see Fig. 14.23B). Under the influence of the BMP-4 released from the bead, the mesenchyme began to express Msx-1, Msx-2, Egr-1, and BMP-4. The mesenchyme did not produce tenascin or syndecan, however, thus showing that other signals in addition to BMP-4 are required to achieve the full inductive response.

With the initial induction of the dental mesenchyme, that tissue itself becomes the next prime mover in tooth development. Inductive signals emanating from the dental mesenchyme next act on the ectoderm of the dental ledge, now in the late bud to early cap stage. Recombination experiments have shown that the dental mesenchyme determines the specific form of the tooth. When molar mesenchyme is combined in vitro with incisor epithelium, a molar tooth takes shape, whereas combining incisor mesenchyme with molar epithelium results in the formation of an incisor.

Under the inductive influence of the dental mesenchyme, now called the dental papilla, a small group of ectodermal cells at the tip of the dental papilla ceases dividing. This mass of cells, called the enamel knot (Fig. 14.24), serves as a signaling center that regulates the shape of the developing tooth. Through the production of several signaling molecules, including shh, FGF-4, and BMP-2, BMP-4, and BMP-7, the enamel knot stimulates the proliferation of cells in the dental cap down and away from itself. By serving as a fixed point in this process, the enamel knot determines the site of the tip of a cusp in the developing tooth. In the case of molar teeth, which have multiple cusps, secondary enamel knots form—one for each cusp. The location and spacing of secondary enamel knots are determined by two molecules, both induced by BMPs. p21 is strongly expressed at sites where secondary enamel knots form, and ectodin is expressed in the intervening spaces. In the absence of ectodin, the secondary enamel knots and the resulting cusps of the molar teeth become massive because of the lack of its restraining influence. Ultimately, the cells of the enamel knot undergo apoptosis, possibly under the influence of BMP-4, which stimulates cell death in several other developmental systems. The appearance of apoptosis terminates the inductive signaling from this structure.

Formation of Dentin and Enamel

Late in their differentiation, odontoblasts withdraw from the cell cycle, elongate, and start secreting predentin from their apical surfaces, which face the enamel organ. The production of predentin signals a shift in the patterns of synthesis from type III collagen and fibronectin to type I collagen and other molecules (e.g., dentin phosphoprotein, dentin osteocalcin) that characterize the dentin matrix. The first dentin is laid against the inner surface of the enamel organ at the apex of the tooth (see Fig. 14.22B). With the secretion of additional dentin, the accumulated material pushes the odontoblastic epithelium from the odontoblast-ameloblast interface.

Terminal differentiation of the ameloblasts occurs after the odontoblasts begin to secrete predentin. In response to inductive signals from the odontoblasts, the ameloblasts withdraw from the cell cycle and begin a new pattern of synthesis, thus producing two classes of proteins: amelogenins and enamelins. About 5% of enamel consists of organic matrix, and amelogenins account for about 90% of this, with enamelins constituting most of the remainder. Enamelins are secreted before the amelogenins, and they may serve as nuclei for the formation of crystals of hydroxyapatite, the dominant inorganic component of enamel.

The amelogenin genes are located on the X and Y chromosomes in humans. Enamel genes have been highly conserved during vertebrate phylogeny. Investigators have suggested that, in early vertebrates, enamel once served as part of an electroreceptor apparatus.

Tooth Eruption and Replacement

Each tooth has a specific time of eruption and replacement (Table 14.1). With the growth of the root, the enamel-covered crown pushes through the oral epithelium. The sequence of eruption begins with the central incisor teeth, usually a few months after birth, and continues generally stepwise until the last of the deciduous molars forms at the end of the second year. A total of 20 deciduous teeth are formed.

Table 14.1

Usual Times of Eruption and Shedding of Deciduous and Permanent Teeth

Teeth Eruption Shedding
Deciduous
Central incisors 6-8 mo 6-7 yr
Lateral incisors 7-10 mo 7-8 yr
Canines 14-18 mo 10-12 yr
First molars 12-16 mo 9-11 yr
Second molars 20-24 mo 10-12 yr
Permanent
Central incisors 7-8 yr  
Lateral incisors 8-9 yr  
Canines 11-13 yr  
First premolars 10-11 yr  
Second premolars 11-12 yr  
First molars 6-7 yr  
Second molars 12-13 yr  
Third molars 15-25 yr  

image

Meanwhile, the primordium of the permanent tooth is embedded in a cavity extending into the bone on the lingual side of the alveolar socket in which the tooth is embedded (see Fig. 14.21F). As the permanent tooth develops, its increasing size causes resorption of the root of the deciduous tooth. When a sufficient amount of the root is destroyed, the deciduous tooth falls out, leaving room for the permanent tooth to take its place. The sequence of eruption of the permanent teeth is the same as that of the deciduous teeth, but an additional 12 permanent teeth (for a total of 32) are formed without deciduous counterparts.

The formation and eruption of teeth are important factors in midfacial growth, much of which occurs after birth. Tooth development and the corresponding growth of the jaw to accommodate the teeth, along with the development of the paranasal sinuses, account for much of the tissue mass of the midface.

Clinical Correlation 14.2 presents malformations of the teeth and dentition.

Clinical Correlation 14.2

Dental Anomalies

Abnormal Tooth Number

Hypodontia

Hypodontia or congenital absence of teeth can be isolated (nonsyndromic) or associated with certain genetic syndromes. Isolated hypodontia can be caused by mutations in the MSX1, EDA, AXIN2, PAX9, and WNT10A genes. Mutations in the EDA gene, which encodes ectodysplasin (see p. 162), cause alterations in its signaling pathway, which subsequently results in X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XLHED) or isolated hypodontia. Characteristic features of patients with XLHED consist of missing or malformed teeth, missing and sparse hair, and absent or dysfunctional exocrine glands. The normally soluble ligand ectodysplasin binds to the membrane-bound receptor Edar, and through its signaling pathway it activates transcription of its target genes. EDA signaling is known to suppress bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP-4) activity and upregulate sonic hedgehog (shh), both of which have crucial roles in tooth formation. Therefore, it is understandable that mutations of EDA cause missing or malformed teeth.

This disorder is X-linked; thus, most patients are male (Fig. 14.25A). Sporadic cases have been reported, but frequently the mutations are inherited from mothers who are heterozygous. The heterozygous mothers are usually normal or have mild manifestations, including microdontia and hypodontia (Fig. 14.25B).

Hyperdontia (Supernumerary Teeth)

Hyperdontia, an excess number of teeth, can be isolated or associated with several genetic syndromes, including cleidocranial dysplasia (see Fig. 9.24) and trichorhinophalangeal syndrome (TRPS 1), which can be caused by mutations in TRPS1. TRPS 1 is a strong transcriptional repressor protein, and its mutation has been hypothesized to cause gain of function and to be responsible for supernumerary teeth (Fig. 14.26) and mandibular prognathism.

TRPS 1 binds to the promoter of RUNX2. All lines of evidence suggest that TRPS 1 and RUNX-2 share the same pathway and that TRPS 1 acts as a repressor of RUNX-2. In mice, the coexpression of Runx2 and Trps 1 has been demonstrated in developing bone (see Fig. 9.17) and in dental mesenchyme during early tooth development.

Abnormal Tooth Size and Shape

Smallest Teeth

Microdontia (small teeth) can be isolated or associated with genetic syndromes. The most commonly affected teeth are the maxillary permanent lateral incisors. They may be of normal shape or peg-shaped. One of the most common causes of microdontia appears to be mutations of the MSX1 gene. Such mutations can also lead to hypodontia and orofacial clefting. The smallest known teeth have been reported in patients with microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II (MOPD II; Fig. 14.27). Patients with this syndrome have severe prenatal and postnatal growth retardation, with a relatively proportionate head size at birth, but extreme microcephaly in adulthood. The striking dental anomalies consist of extremely small teeth, opalescent and abnormally shaped teeth, and rootless molars. Teeth are spontaneously exfoliated because the alveolar bone is severely hypoplastic. MOPD II, a very rare autosomal recessive disorder, is caused by mutations in PCNT. PCNT encodes the centrosomal protein pericentrin, a protein crucial for cell division. This gene is expressed in both the epithelium and the mesenchyme during early tooth development. The clinical phenotype, including the small size of the teeth, is the consequence of loss of microtubule integrity, which leads to defective centrosome function.

Largest Teeth

Macrodontia, the condition of having larger than normal teeth, is an extremely rare condition. Macrodontia of the maxillary permanent central incisors is typical in patients with KBG syndrome, which is characterized by intellectual disability, skeletal malformation, and macrodontia. It is caused by mutations in ANKRD11, whose protein plays an important role in neural plasticity. Generalized macrodontia is extremely rare. This syndrome has been reported in patients with Ekman-Westborg-Julin syndrome or multiple macrodontic multituberculism. Patients with this syndrome have the largest teeth ever reported (Fig. 14.28). The molecular origin of this syndrome is unknown.

Molarized Incisors

True transformation of incisors to molars is an extremely rare condition (Fig. 14.29). Misexpression of Barx-1 in mice by the inhibition of BMP signaling can result in the formation of molar teeth instead of incisors (see p. 310). This finding provides strong support for a role of homeobox genes in controlling tooth type.

Abnormal Tooth Structure

Abnormal Dentin: Dentinogenesis Imperfecta

Abnormalities of dentin include dentinogenesis imperfecta and dentin dysplasia. Teeth with dentinogenesis imperfecta appear blue-gray or amber brown and are opalescent. Dentinogenesis imperfecta can be nonsyndromic or associated with osteogenesis imperfecta (Fig. 14.30). Nonsyndromic dentinogenesis imperfecta is caused by mutations in the DSPP (dentin sialophosphoprotein) gene, which encodes dentin sialoprotein, a noncollagenous protein of dentin.

Dentinogenesis imperfecta, which is associated with osteogenesis imperfecta, is caused by mutations in the type I collagen genes COL1A1 or COL1A2. Osteogenesis imperfecta is a heterogeneous group of heritable connective tissue disorders, caused by abnormal type I collagen synthesis. Characteristic features include increased bone fragility, bone deformities (see Fig. 14.30A and B), joint hyperextensibility, blue sclerae, hearing loss, and dentinogenesis imperfecta.

Abnormal Enamel: Amelogenesis Imperfecta

Amelogenesis imperfecta is a group of clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorders that affect the development of enamel and result in abnormalities of the amount, composition, and/or structure of enamel. These disorders are caused by mutations in a variety of genes that are important for enamel formation. The enamel may be hypoplastic, hypomature, or hypocalcified (Fig. 14.31). Mutations in several genes, including ENAM, AMEL, DLX3, and P63, are known to cause isolated or syndromic amelogenesis imperfecta.

Dental Fluorosis

Excessive fluoride consumption during tooth formation can cause enamel fluorosis, which ranges from white spots or lines in the enamel to enamel hypoplasia (Fig. 14.32). The white opaque appearance of fluorosed enamel is caused by a hypomineralized enamel subsurface. The changes in enamel are related to cell-matrix interactions when the teeth are forming. At an early stage of enamel maturation, the amount of amelogenin in the enamel matrix of fluorosed enamel is very high, thus resulting in a delay in the removal of amelogenin by proteinases as the enamel matures. This subsequently causes abnormal mineralization of the enamel.

Investigators have demonstrated a genetic component to dental fluorosis susceptibility. This means that some people are more prone to have enamel fluorosis than others. Some people with excessive fluoride consumption may have skeletal fluorosis, but fluorosed bone disappears later in life because bones remodel, whereas enamel does not. Therefore, enamel fluorosis is permanent.

Tetracycline-Stained Teeth

Ingestion of tetracyclines during tooth development causes abnormal tooth formation (see Table 8.7). The discoloration of teeth is permanent and ranges from yellow or gray to brown (Fig. 14.33B). It appears fluorescent under ultraviolet light (Fig. 14.33A). The discoloration is permanent, and the degree of discoloration depends on the dose and type of drug. Tetracyclines are incorporated into tissues that are calcifying at the time of their administration. They are able to chelate with calcium ions and form a tetracycline-calcium orthophosphate complex in teeth, cartilage, and bone that results in discoloration of the primary and permanent teeth.

By Piranit N. Kantaputra, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

Development of the Pharynx and Its Derivatives

Considering the complexity of the structural arrangements of the embryonic pharynx, it is not surprising that many different structures originate in the pharyngeal region. This complexity provides many opportunities for abnormal development, as discussed in Clinical Correlation 14.3 at the end of this section. This section details aspects of later development that lead to the formation of specific structures. Adult derivatives of the regions of the pharynx and pharyngeal arches are summarized in Figure 14.34.

External Development of the Pharyngeal Region

Externally, the pharyngeal (branchial) region is characterized by four pharyngeal arches and grooves interposed between the arches (Fig. 14.35; see Fig. 14.4). These structures give rise to a diverse array of derivatives.

Pharyngeal Arches

As mentioned earlier, the endoderm of the foregut is the main driver in organizing development of the pharynx. Under the influence of various concentrations of retinoic acid (see p. 297), combinations of Hox genes determine the craniocaudal identity of the segments of the pharynx. The first pharyngeal arch develops independently of Hox genes, whereas expression of Hoxa-2 and Hoxa-3 is required for formation of the second and third pharyngeal arches. Similar to the pharyngeal arches, the pharyngeal pouches, as well as having individual identities, are characterized by highly regionalized molecular patterns in the dorsoventral and the craniocaudal axes. Signals from the pharyngeal endoderm pattern the pharyngeal arches even before cranial neural crest cells enter the arches (see Fig. 14.5). Tbx-1 expression in the early pharyngeal endoderm influences FGF-8 signaling, and in its absence pharyngeal pouches do not form normally, and a sequence of malformations reminiscent of DiGeorge’s syndrome occurs.

In addition to being packed with mesenchyme (mainly of neural crest origin except for the premuscle mesoderm, which migrates from the somitomeres), each pharyngeal arch is associated with a major artery (aortic arch) and a cranial nerve (see Fig. 14.34). Each also contains a central rod of precartilaginous mesenchyme, which is transformed into characteristic adult skeletal derivatives. Understanding the relationship between the pharyngeal arches and their innervation and vascular supply is very important, because tissues often maintain their relationship with their original nerve as they migrate out or become displaced from their site of origin in the pharyngeal arch system.

The first pharyngeal arch (mandibular) contributes mainly to structures of the face (both mandibular and maxillary portions) and ear (see Fig. 14.34). Its central cartilaginous rod, Meckel’s cartilage, is a prominent component of the embryonic lower jaw until it is surrounded by locally formed intramembranous bone, which forms the definitive jaw. During later development, the distal part of Meckel’s cartilage undergoes resorption because of extensive apoptosis of the chondrocytes. More dorsally, Meckel’s cartilage forms the sphenomandibular ligament, the anterior ligament of the malleus, and the malleus (Fig. 14.36). In addition, the incus arises from a primordium of the quadrate cartilage. The first-arch musculature is associated with the masticatory apparatus, the pharynx, and the middle ear. A common feature of these muscles is their innervation by the trigeminal nerve (cranial nerve V).

The molecular basis for development of the first pharyngeal arch is quite different from that of the other arches, starting with the origin of the neural crest that populates it. The neural crest cells that populate the first arch are derived from rhombomeres 1 and 2 and midbrain, which are anterior to the expression domain of the Hox genes. Cellular precursors of the first-arch mesenchyme are instead associated with the expression of Otx-2. The role of signaling molecules and transcription factors, such as Dlx and Msx, is discussed earlier (see pp. 299-301).

The second pharyngeal arch (hyoid) also forms a string of skeletal structures from the body of the hyoid bone to the stapes of the middle ear. These structures are derived from Reichert’s cartilage, which, instead of being a single rod, is actually two cartilaginous rodlike elements with a strand of mesenchymal tissue connecting them. Although much of the second-arch mesoderm migrates to the face to form the muscles of facial expression, additional muscles become associated with other second-arch skeletal derivatives; a good example is the stapedius muscle, which is associated with the stapes bone. These second-arch muscles are innervated by the facial nerve (cranial nerve VII).

Patterning of the second pharyngeal arch is strongly influenced by the homeobox gene Hoxa2. When this gene is knocked out in mice, skeletal derivatives of the second arch fail to form. The second arch in such mutant animals contains mirror-image duplicates of many of the proximal bones of the first-arch skeleton. This may be a result of the response of the mutant second-arch mesenchyme to an ectodermal signal from the first pharyngeal cleft that plays a role in patterning the first arch. The formation of mirror-image first-arch structures is analogous to the formation of mirror-image supernumerary limbs after transplantation of the zone of polarizing activity in the limb bud (see p. 198). The finding that only proximal structures are affected reflects the different genetic control of proximal and distal segments of the arches.

The third and fourth pharyngeal arches are otherwise unnamed. The third arch gives rise to structures related to the hyoid bone and upper pharynx. The third-arch skeleton becomes the greater horn of the hyoid bone. The one muscular derivative (stylopharyngeus) of the third arch is innervated by the glossopharyngeal nerve (cranial nerve IX). The fourth arch gives rise to certain muscles and cartilages of the larynx and lower pharynx. The muscles are innervated by the vagus nerve (cranial nerve X), which also grows into the thoracic and abdominal cavities.

Pharyngeal Grooves

The first pharyngeal groove is the only one that persists as a recognizable adult structure: the external auditory meatus. Grooves II and III become covered by the enlarged external portion of the second arch (a phylogenetic homologue of the operculum [gill cover] of fish). The enlargement of the second arch is caused by the presence of a signaling center in the ectoderm at its tip; such a signaling center is not present in arches 3 or 4. As in the facial primordia, this signaling center produces shh, FGF-8, and BMP-7, which stimulate growth of the underlying mesenchyme. During the period of their overshadowing by the hyoid (second) arch, grooves II and III are collectively known as the cervical sinus (Fig. 14.37; see Fig. 13.27). As development progresses, the posterior ectoderm of the second arch fuses with ectoderm of a swelling (cardiac swelling) just posterior to the fourth arch, thus causing the cervical sinus to disappear and the external contours of the neck to become smooth.

Internal Development of the Stomodeal and Pharyngeal Regions

Pharynx and Pharyngeal Pouches

The embryonic pharynx is directly converted to the smooth-walled pharynx of the adult. Of greater developmental interest is the fate of the pharyngeal pouches and their lining epithelium.

As with their corresponding first pharyngeal clefts, the first pharyngeal pouches become intimately involved in the formation of the ear. The end of each pouch expands to become the tympanic cavity of the middle ear, and the remainder becomes the auditory (eustachian) tube, which connects the middle ear with the pharynx (see Fig. 13.24).

The second pharyngeal pouches become shallower and less conspicuous as development progresses. Late in the fetal period, patches of lymphoid tissue form aggregations in the walls to create the palatine (faucial) tonsils. The pouches themselves are represented only as the supratonsillar fossae.

The third pharyngeal pouch is a more complex structure, consisting of a solid, dorsal epithelial mass and a hollow, elongated ventral portion (see Fig. 14.37). Through yet incompletely known mechanisms, the third pouch endoderm is specified very early into a parathyroid/thymus primordium. In a manner reminiscent of dorsoventral patterning of the neural tube (see p. 222), delineation of the common endodermal primordium into parathyroid and thymic segments occurs in response to opposing shh and BMP-4 gradients, with high levels of shh promoting a parathyroid fate and high BMP-4 leading to thymic development. Future parathyroid cells can be recognized by their expression of Gcm-2 (Glial cells missing) transcription factor, whereas future thymus cells express Foxn-1. By 5 weeks of gestation, cells identifiable as parathyroid tissue can be recognized in the endoderm of the solid dorsal mass. The ventral elongation of the third pouch differentiates into the epithelial portion of the thymus gland. The primordia of the thymus and the parathyroid glands lose their connection with the third pharyngeal pouch and migrate caudally from their site of origin. Although the parathyroid III primordia initially comigrate with the thymic primordia, they ultimately continue to migrate toward the midline. There they join with the thyroid gland and pass the parathyroid primordia of the fourth pouch to form the inferior parathyroid glands. The third pharyngeal pouch disappears.

The fourth pharyngeal pouch is organized much as the third, with a solid, bulbous, dorsal parathyroid IV primordium. It also contains a small ventral epithelial outpocketing, which contributes a minor component to the thymus in some species. In humans, the thymic component of the fourth pouch is vestigial. At the ventralmost part of each fourth pouch is another structure called the postbranchial (ultimobranchial) body (see Fig. 14.37). Neural crest cells migrate into the postbranchial bodies and ultimately become the secretory component of these structures.

As with their counterparts from the third pouch, the parathyroid IV primordia lose their connection with the fourth pouch and migrate toward the thyroid gland as superior parathyroid glands. The postbranchial bodies also migrate toward the thyroid, where they become incorporated as parafollicular or C cells. The parafollicular cells, which are of neural crest origin, produce the polypeptide hormone calcitonin, which acts to reduce the concentration of calcium in the blood. The parathyroid glands produce parathyroid hormone, which increases blood calcium levels.

Thyroid

Development of the thyroid gland begins with local mesodermal inductive signals acting on the ventral endoderm of the foregut. This process results in the specification of a small number of endodermal cells (as few as 60 in the mouse) to be destined to a thyroid fate. These founder cells, the thyroid anlage, increase in number to form a thickened placode that soon begins to extend into the surrounding mesodermal mesenchyme, at which point it is called a thyroid bud. These cells are characterized by the expression of four transcription factors (Hhex, Nkx2-1, Pax-8, and Foxe-1), which operate together in a complex interacting pattern and all of which are required for further thyroid development.

The unpaired primordium (thyroid bud) of the thyroid gland appears in the ventral midline of the pharynx between the first and second pouches (see Fig. 14.37). Starting during the fourth week as an endodermal thickening just caudal to the median tongue bud (tuberculum impar), the thyroid primordium soon elongates to form a prominent downgrowth called the thyroid diverticulum. The pathway of caudal extension of the bilobed thyroid diverticulum is determined by the pattern of arteries in the neck and extension and continues during pharyngeal development. During its caudal migration, the tip of the thyroid diverticulum expands and bifurcates to form the thyroid gland itself, which consists of two main lobes connected by an isthmus. For some time, the gland remains connected to its original site of origin by a narrow thyroglossal duct.

By about the seventh week, when the thyroid has reached its final location at the level of the second and third tracheal cartilages, the thyroglossal duct has largely regressed. Nevertheless, in almost half the population, the distal portion of the thyroglossal duct persists as the pyramidal lobe of the thyroid. The original site of the thyroid primordium persists as the foramen cecum, a small blind pit at the base of the tongue.

The thyroid gland undergoes histodifferentiation and begins functioning early in embryonic development. By 10 weeks of gestation, follicles containing some colloid material are evident, and a few weeks thereafter, the gland begins to synthesize noniodinated thyroglobulin. Secretion of triiodothyronine, one of the forms of thyroid hormone, is detectable by late in the fourth month.

Hypophysis

The hypophysis (pituitary gland) develops from two initially separate ectodermal primordia that secondarily unite. One of the primordia, called the infundibular process, forms as a ventral downgrowth from the floor of the diencephalon. The other primordium is Rathke’s pouch, a midline outpocketing from the stomodeal ectoderm that extends toward the floor of the diencephalon as early as the fourth week. An inductive event from the overlying diencephalon, mediated first by BMP-4 and then by FGF-8, stimulates the formation of a Rathke’s pouch primordium in the dorsal stomodeal ectoderm and provides cues for molecular events that stimulate cell proliferation. Through the action of Hesx-1 (homeobox gene expressed in embryonic stem cells, formerly called Rpx) and the Lim-type homeobox-containing genes Lhx3 and Lhx4, Rathke’s pouch primordium forms the definitive Rathke’s pouch (Fig. 14.38). In the early embryo, the cells in Rathke’s pouch originate in the anterior ridge of the neural plate.

The infundibular process is intimately related to the hypothalamus (see Fig. 1.15), and certain hypothalamic neurosecretory neurons send their processes into the infundibular process, which ultimately becomes the neural lobe of the hypophysis. Throughout development, the histological structure of the infundibulum retains a neural character.

As development proceeds, Rathke’s pouch elongates toward the infundibulum (see Fig. 14.38). While its blind end partially enfolds the infundibulum like a double-layered cup, the stalk of Rathke’s pouch begins to regress. The outer wall of the cup thickens and assumes a glandular appearance in the course of its differentiation into the pars distalis (anterior lobe) of the hypophysis. The inner layer of the cup, which is closely adherent to the neural lobe, becomes the pars intermedia (intermediate lobe). It remains separated from the anterior lobe by a slitlike residual lumen, which represents all that remains of the original lumen of Rathke’s pouch.

With the progression of pregnancy, the hypophysis undergoes a phase of cytodifferentiation. Late in the fetal period, specific cell types begin to produce small amounts of hormones. Molecular cascades underlying the differentiation of specific cell types in the pituitary are being discovered (Box 14.1).

Although Rathke’s pouch normally begins to lose its connections to the stomodeal epithelium by the end of the second month, portions of the tissue may occasionally persist along the pathway of the elongating stalk. If the tissue is normal, it is called a pharyngeal hypophysis. Sometimes, however, the residual tissue becomes neoplastic and forms hormone-secreting tumors called craniopharyngiomas.

Thymus and Lymphoid Organs

The paired endodermal thymic primordia begin to migrate from their third pharyngeal pouch origins during the sixth week. Their path of migration takes them through a substrate of mesenchymal cells until they reach the area of the future mediastinum behind the sternum. By the end of their migration, the two closely apposed thymic lobes are still epithelial structures. Soon, however, they become invested with a capsule of neural crest–derived connective tissue, which also forms septa among the endodermal epithelial cords and contributes to the thymic vasculature. In the absence of neural crest, the thymus fails to develop. An interaction between the neural crest and endodermal components of the thymic primordia conditions the latter for subsequent differentiation of thymic structure and function.

At about 9 to 10 weeks’ gestation, blood-borne thymocyte precursors (prothymocytes), which originate in the hematopoietic tissue, begin to invade the epithelial thymus, in response to the secretion of the chemokine CC121 by the thymus. Just before the prothymocytes invade the thymus, the thymic epithelium begins to express the transcription factor WHN, which is necessary for colonization of the thymic epithelium by the prothymocytes. In homozygous WHN mutants, the absence of such colonization results in the absence of functional T cells, thus leaving the individual severely immunocompromised and unable to reject foreign cells and tissue. Within the thymus, the prothymocytes force apart the epithelial cells and cause them to form a spongy epithelial reticulum. Responding to signals from the thymic epithelium, the prothymocytes proliferate and become redistributed, forming the cortical and medullary regions of the thymus.

By 14 to 15 weeks of gestation, blood vessels grow into the thymus, and a week later, some epithelial cells aggregate into small, spherical Hassall’s corpuscles. At this point, the overall organization of the thymus is the same as that of adults. Functionally, the action of various thymic hormones causes the thymus to condition or instruct the prothymocytes migrating into it to become competent members of the T-lymphocyte family. The T lymphocytes leave the thymus and populate other lymphoid organs (e.g., lymph nodes, spleen) as fully functional immune cells.

The T lymphocytes are principally involved in cellular immune responses. Another population of lymphocytes that also originates in the bone marrow is instructed to become B lymphocytes, which are the mediators of humoral immune responses. B-lymphocyte precursors (pro-B cells) also must undergo conditioning to become fully functional, but their conditioning does not occur in the thymus. In birds, the pro-B cells pass through a cloacal lymphoid organ known as the bursa of Fabricius, where conditioning occurs. Humans do not possess a bursa, but its functional equivalent, although still undefined, is assumed to exist. B-lymphocyte conditioning is thought to occur in the bone marrow; in early embryos, conditioning possibly occurs in the liver.

The thymus and the bursa or mammalian equivalent are commonly referred to as central lymphoid organs. The lymphoid structures that are seeded by B and T lymphocytes are called peripheral lymphoid organs. (Figure 14.39 shows the development and function of the lymphoid system.) Small cervical thymus glands have been discovered in the neck in mice. How their function fits into that of the overall lymphoid system remains to be determined.

Formation of the Tongue

The tongue begins to take shape from a series of ventral swellings in the floor of the pharynx at about the same time as the palate forms in the mouth. Major shifts in the positions of tissues of the tongue occur, thus making the characteristics of the adult form difficult to comprehend without knowledge of the basic elements of its embryonic development.

In 5-week-old embryos, the tongue is represented by a pair of lateral lingual swellings in the ventral regions of the first pharyngeal arches and two median unpaired swellings. The tuberculum impar is located between the first and second arches, and the copula (yoke) unites the second and third arches (Figs. 14.40A and B and 14.41). The foramen cecum, which marks the original location of the thyroid primordium, serves as a convenient landmark delineating the border between the original tuberculum impar and the copula. Caudal to the copula is another swelling that represents the epiglottis.

Growth of the body of the tongue is accomplished by a great expansion of the lateral lingual swellings, with a minor contribution by the tuberculum impar (Fig. 14.40C and D). The root of the tongue is derived from the copula, along with additional ventromedial tissue between the third and fourth pharyngeal arches.

The dorsal surface of the tongue is covered with a large number of papillae. Development of the filiform papillae, which constitute the bulk of the papillae, follows a course that is remarkably similar to that of hair follicles. The ectoderm, which surrounds a mesenchymal core, expresses Hoxc-13 and the signaling factors shh, BMP-2 and BMP-4, and FGF-8. These molecular components characterize the inductive signaling system in almost all ectodermal derivatives, including hairs, feathers, and teeth.

Corresponding to its innervation by the hypoglossal nerve (cranial nerve XII), the musculature of the tongue migrates from a considerable distance (the occipital [postotic] myotomes). Similar to their counterparts in the limb, the myoblasts express Pax-3 during their migration to the tongue. The general sensory innervation of the tongue accurately reflects the pharyngeal arch origins of the epithelium. The lingual epithelium over the body of the tongue is innervated by the trigeminal nerve (cranial nerve V), in keeping with the first-arch origins of the lateral lingual swellings. Correspondingly, the root of the tongue is innervated by the glossopharyngeal nerve (cranial nerve IX—third arch) and the vagus nerve (cranial nerve X—fourth arch). The epithelium of the second arch is overgrown by that of the third arch; there is no general sensory innervation of the tongue by the seventh nerve.

Cranial nerves VII (facial) and IX innervate the taste buds. The contribution of cranial nerve VII is facilitated by its chorda tympani branch, which joins with the lingual branch of the trigeminal nerve and has access to the body of the tongue. Taste buds appear during the seventh week of gestation. In contrast to an earlier hypothesis that they are induced by fibers of the visceral afferent cranial nerves VII and IX, which innervate taste buds postnatally, more recent evidence suggests that taste bud formation is independent of cranial nerves. An intrinsic signaling mechanism within the endodermal lingual epithelium, possibly mediated by a mechanism involving shh, Gli-1, and patched, seems to be the basis for the initial formation of taste buds. When formed, taste buds become strongly dependent on innervation for their maintenance. Considerable evidence indicates that the fetus is able to taste, and it has been postulated that the fetus uses the taste function to monitor its intra-amniotic environment.

Clinical Correlation 14.3 presents anomalies and syndromes involving the pharynx and pharyngeal arches.

Clinical Correlation 14.3   Anomalies and Syndromes Involving the Pharynx and Pharyngeal Arches

Syndromes Involving the First Pharyngeal Arch

Several syndromes involve hypoplasia of the mandible and other structures arising from the first pharyngeal arch. Various mechanisms can account for these syndromes. Many have a genetic basis, and others result from exposure to environmental teratogens. The numerous studies on genetically manipulated mice are beginning to produce malformations that may have human counterparts. With the fine balance of signaling molecules and transcription factors that are involved in the development of the pharyngeal arches, it is not surprising that disturbances in the function of single genes, whether through mutation or the action of teratogens, can result in a visible morphological anomaly. Hypoplasia of the lower face has been associated with the ingestion of isotretinoin (a vitamin A derivative used for the treatment of acne) during early pregnancy.

Pierre Robin syndrome involves extreme micrognathia (small mandible), cleft palate, and associated defects of the ear. An imbalance often exists between the size of the tongue and the very hypoplastic jaw, which can lead to respiratory distress caused by mechanical interference of the pharyngeal airway by the large tongue. Although many cases of Pierre Robin syndrome are sporadic, others have a genetic basis.

Treacher Collins syndrome (mandibulofacial dysostosis) is typically inherited as an autosomal dominant condition. The responsible gene, called TCOF1, has been identified. Operating through the Treacle protein, it affects the survival and proliferation of cranial neural crest cells. In mutations of this gene, neural crest cell migration is normal, but increased apoptosis and decreased proliferation result in a much reduced population of neural crest cells in the first pharyngeal arch. This syndrome includes various anomalies, not all of which are found in all patients. Common components of the syndrome include hypoplasia of the mandible and facial bones, malformations of the external and middle ears, high or cleft palate, faulty dentition, and coloboma-type defects of the lower eyelid (Fig. 14.42).

The most extreme form of first-arch hypoplasia is agnathia, in which the lower jaw basically fails to form (Fig. 14.43). In severe agnathia, the external ears remain in the ventral cervical region and may join in the ventral midline.

Lateral Cysts, Sinuses, and Fistulas

Structural malformations, such as lateral cysts, sinuses, and fistulas, can be related directly to the abnormal persistence of pharyngeal grooves, pharyngeal pouches, or both. A cyst is a completely enclosed, epithelially lined cavity that may be derived from the persistence of part of a pharyngeal pouch, a pharyngeal groove, or a cervical sinus. A sinus is closed on one end and open to the outside or to the pharynx. A fistula (Latin for “pipe”) is an epithelially lined tube that is open at both ends—in this case, to the outside and to the pharynx.

The postnatal location of these structures accurately marks the location of their embryonic precursors. External openings of fistulas are typically found anterior to the sternocleidomastoid muscle in the neck (Fig. 14.44). Fistulas from remnants of pharyngeal grooves II or III may result from incomplete closure of the cervical sinus by tissue of the hyoid arch. Although present from birth, cervical cysts are often not manifested until after puberty. At that time, they expand because of increased amounts of secretions by the epithelium lining the inner surface of the cyst, changes that correspond to maturational changes in the normal epidermis.

Preauricular sinuses or fistulas, which are found in a triangular region in front of the ear, are also common. These structures are assumed to represent persistent clefts between preauricular hillocks on the first and second arches. True fistulas (cervicoaural fistulas) represent persisting ventral portions of the first pharyngeal groove. These extend from a pharyngeal opening to somewhere along the auditory tube or even the external auditory meatus.

Thyroglossal Duct Remnants

Various abnormal structures can persist along the pathway of the thyroglossal duct. Ectopic thyroid tissue can be found anywhere along the pathway of migration of the thyroid primordium from the foramen cecum in the tongue to the isthmus of the normal thyroid gland (Fig. 14.45). This fact must be considered in the clinical diagnosis or surgical treatment of carcinomas and other conditions affecting thyroid tissue. Less common are midline cysts or sinuses involving the former thyroglossal duct (Fig. 14.46). Because of their location, these entities can usually be easily distinguished from their lateral cervical counterparts.

Malformations of the Tongue

The most common malformation of the tongue is ankyloglossia (tongue-tie). This condition is caused by subnormal regression of the frenulum, the thin midline tissue that connects the ventral surface of the tongue to the floor of the mouth. Nonsyndromic ankyloglossia is caused by a mutation in the T-box transcription factor TBX22. Less common malformations of the tongue are macroglossia and microglossia, which are characterized by hyperplasia and hypoplasia of lingual tissue. Although sometimes associated with macroglossia, furrowed tongue (Fig. 14.47) is not normally associated with major functional disturbances.

Ectopic Parathyroid or Thymic Tissue

Because of their extensive migrations during early embryogenesis, parathyroid glands and components of the thymus gland are often found in abnormal sites (Fig. 14.48). Typically, this displacement is not accompanied by functional abnormalities, but awareness of the possibility of ectopic tissue or even supernumerary parathyroid glands is important for the surgeon.

DiGeorge’s Syndrome

DiGeorge’s syndrome is a cranial neural crest deficiency and is manifested by immunological defects and hypoparathyroidism (see Clinical Correlation 12.1). The underlying pathological condition is failure of differentiation of the thymus and parathyroid glands. Associated anomalies are malformations of first-arch structures and defects of the outflow tract of the heart, which contains an important cranial neural crest contribution as well. Hoxa3 mutant mice exhibit many of the characteristics of human DiGeorge’s syndrome.

Summary

image The early craniofacial region arises from the rostral portions of the neural tube, the notochord, and the pharynx, which is surrounded by a series of paired aortic arches. Between the aortic arches and the overlying ectoderm are large masses of neural crest–derived and mesodermally derived mesenchyme. Some of these components show evidence of anatomical segmentation or segmental patterns of gene expression.

image Massive migrations of segmental groups of neural crest cells provide the mesenchyme for much of the facial region. The musculature of the craniofacial region is derived from somitomeric mesoderm or the occipital somites. The connective tissue component of the facial musculature is of neural crest origin.

image The pharyngeal (branchial) region is organized around paired mesenchymal pharyngeal arches, which alternate with endodermally lined pharyngeal pouches and ectodermally lined pharyngeal grooves.

image The face and lower jaw arise from an unpaired frontonasal prominence and paired nasomedial, maxillary, and mandibular processes. Through differential growth and fusion, the nasomedial processes form the upper jaw and lip, and the frontonasal prominence forms the upper part of the face. The expanding mandibular processes merge to form the lower jaw and lip. A nasolacrimal groove between the nasolateral and maxillary processes ultimately becomes canalized to form the nasolacrimal duct, which connects the orbit to the nasal cavity.

image The palate arises from the fusion of an unpaired median palatine process and paired lateral palatine processes. The former forms the primary palate, and the latter forms the secondary palate. Fusion of the lateral palatal shelves involves removal of the midline epithelial seam by a combination of apoptosis, migration, and transformation of epithelial cells into mesenchyme.

image The olfactory apparatus begins as a pair of thickened ectodermal nasal placodes. As these sink to form nasal pits, they are surrounded by horseshoe-shaped nasomedial and nasolateral processes. The nasomedial processes form the bridge and septum of the nose, and the nasolateral processes form the alae of the nose. The deepening nasal pits break into the oral cavity, and only later are the nasal cavities separated from the oral cavity by the palate.

image The salivary glands arise as epithelial outgrowths of the oral epithelium. Through a series of continuing interactions with the surrounding mesenchyme, the expanding glandular epithelium branches and differentiates.

image Teeth form from interactions between oral ectoderm (dental lamina) and neural crest mesenchyme. A developing tooth is first a tooth bud, which then passes through a cap and bell stage. Late in the bell stage, ectodermal cells (ameloblasts) of the epithelial enamel organ begin to form enamel, and the neural crest–derived epithelium (odontoblasts) begins to secrete dentin. Precursors of the permanent teeth form dental primordia along the more advanced primary teeth.

image Malformations of the face are common. Many, such as cleft lip and cleft palate, represent the persistence of the structural arrangements that are normal for earlier embryonic stages. Others, such as holoprosencephaly and hypertelorism, result from growth disturbances in the frontonasal process. Most facial malformations seem to be multifactorial in origin, involving genetic susceptibility and environmental causes.

image Components of the pharynx (pharyngeal grooves, pharyngeal arches, and pharyngeal pouches) give rise to a wide variety of structures. The first arch gives rise to the upper and lower jaws and associated structures. The first groove and pouch, along with associated mesenchyme from the first and second arches, form the many structures of the external and middle ear. The second, third, and fourth pharyngeal grooves become obliterated and form the outer surface of the neck, and the components of the second through fourth arches form the pharyngeal skeleton and much of the musculature and connective tissue of the pharyngeal part of the neck. The endoderm of the third and fourth pouches forms the thymus and parathyroid glands. The thyroid gland arises from an unpaired ventral endodermal outgrowth of the upper pharynx.

image The tongue originates from multiple ventral swellings in the floor of the pharynx. The bulk of the tongue comes from the paired lateral lingual swellings in the region of the first pharyngeal arches. The unpaired tuberculum impar and copula also contribute to the formation of the tongue. The tongue musculature, along with the hypoglossal nerve (cranial nerve XII), which supplies the muscles, arises from the occipital somites. General sensory innervation of the tongue (from cranial nerves V, IX, and X) corresponds with the embryological origin of the innervated part of the tongue. Cranial nerves VII and IX innervate the taste buds on the tongue.

image Many malformations of the lower face and jaw are related to hypoplasia of the first pharyngeal arches. Cysts, sinuses, and fistulas of the neck are commonly caused by abnormal persistence of pharyngeal grooves or pouches. Ectopic glandular tissue (thyroid, thymus, or parathyroid) is explained by the persistence of tissue rests along the pathway of migration of the glands. Certain syndromes (e.g., DiGeorge’s syndrome), which seemingly affect disparate organs, can be attributed to neural crest defects.

Share this: