Hand and Wrist Injuries

Published on 10/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 10/02/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 1 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 1641 times

89 Hand and Wrist Injuries

Epidemiology

Annually, more than 16 million people suffer some form of hand injury, and more than 4.8 million will seek treatment of these injuries at the emergency department (ED).1 Traumatic injuries may include lacerations, fractures, and tendon or ligamentous injuries. Most injuries are readily identified in the ED, provided that the assessment is effective.2 Because the morbidity associated with undiagnosed, misdiagnosed, or mistreated hand injuries is significant, a high level of expertise is required of the EP.

Presenting Signs and Symptoms

When assessing hand injuries, the history should focus on the mechanism of the injury, hand position at the time of the insult, perceived resultant functional impairment, and the time elapsed since the injury. Some mechanisms yield classic injury patterns, such as the jersey finger and mallet finger. Other injury patterns are known for their poor outcomes, such as fight bites or high-pressure injection injuries, and require specific managements. Some wounds are more prone to infection, such as crush injuries and grossly contaminated wounds.

During the history the patient’s hand dominance and career should also be ascertained and documented. Factors that may compromise wound healing, such as smoking, drug use, or an immunocompromised state, are important to document.2 Tetanus status should be verified.

Despite its complicated nature, the hand can be examined adequately in a short period. Developing a rapid, reproducible hand examination strategy and performing it regularly will decrease the chance of missing subtle injuries. Even when a specific injury is obvious, it is important to examine the entire hand to avoid overlooking less obvious, coincident injuries. Box 89.1 lists one approach to comprehensive assessment of the hand.

Assuming that no active bleeding is occurring and requires immediate attention, examination of the hand begins with inspection. All rings, watches, and other potentially constricting devices should be removed immediately.3 Lacerations and other disruptions in skin integrity are usually recognized easily; erythema, soft tissue swelling, and ecchymoses should also be noted. It is important to compare the general position of the hand with that of the unaffected side inasmuch as many fractures or tendon disruptions will cause characteristic deformities that are recognizable on inspection.

Vascular integrity should be determined by comparing skin temperature with that of the opposite hand, feeling for ulnar and radial pulses, and documenting intact and symmetric distal capillary refill.

Neurologic testing should be performed before local or regional anesthesia. Radial, median, and ulnar nerve function should be individually assessed and the digital nerves interrogated via both light touch and two-point discrimination. Comparison with the unaffected side can be useful. To evaluate for radial neuropathy, the dorsal aspect of the second and third web space is tested for decreased sensation. Proximal limb radial nerve lesions will cause wristdrop. However, the superficial radial nerve, as it courses through the hand, is sensory only. To test for median neuropathy, the distal, palmar surface of the second digit is assessed for decreased sensation. Placing the hand dorsal side down and abducting the fifth digit toward the ceiling tests motor function. Resistance is applied to the thenar eminence, followed by palpation, to test for contraction of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle. To test for ulnar neuropathy, the distal, palmar surface of the fifth digit is assessed for decreased sensation. Challenging the interosseous muscles best tests ulnar motor function. One method is to ask the patient to place the injured hand on a surface with the fifth digit down and the thumb pointing at the ceiling. The patient then abducts the second finger (spreads the fingers) against resistance; weakness of the first interosseous muscle verifies contraction.

Musculoskeletal assessment is targeted at identifying injuries to bones, joints, and ligaments. Bone structures should be palpated thoroughly, as should all joints, to look for signs of pain, laxity, and limited range of motion. Every digit and joint should be put through complete active and passive range of motion. All extensor and flexor tendons should be tested individually. Specific tendon function is evaluated by ranging every joint individually. Extensor tendon function is tested by extending all interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints against resistance. Flexor digitorum profundus tendon injury limits flexion at the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint; its presence is confirmed by holding the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and MCP joints in extension and flexing the DIP joint against resistance. Flexor digitorum sublimis tendon injury limits flexion at the PIP joint. This injury is confirmed by holding the MCP joint in extension and flexing the PIP joint against resistance. False-negative results occur if all the other digits are not held in complete extension. The uninjured thumb will have complete active range of motion without pain and should be able to oppose the fifth digit. Full flexion to a fist and full extension should be normal.

Differential Diagnosis and Medical Decision Making

Fractures of the Hand

Bennett/Reverse Bennett and Rolando Fractures

A Bennett fracture is a fracture of the proximal first metacarpal bone (Fig. 89.1). The classic mechanism is an axial load onto a flexed and adducted thumb. For example, a football quarterback strikes the helmet of an opposing player after releasing a throw. In this avulsion injury, the strong abductor pollicis longus muscle fractures the bone at the point of its insertion at the ulnar aspect of the first metacarpal bone. This causes displacement of a bony fragment, which can be seen on a plain film radiograph. It is usually an unstable fracture, and ED management should consist of referral to a hand surgeon and immobilization in a thumb spica splint. Potential long-term morbidity includes malunion, decreased function, and significant arthritis.

image

Fig. 89.1 Bennett fracture (arrows).

(From Mettler Jr FA. Essentials of radiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004.)

The same injury pattern and mechanism of injury can also occur in the fifth metacarpal bone and is called a reverse Bennett fracture, which is as unstable as a Bennett fracture because of the traction exerted by the extensor carpi ulnaris muscle on the distal aspect of the fifth metacarpal. Traction tends to pull the distal segment ulnarly. Closed reduction with ulnar gutter splinting may be attempted, but any articular incongruity must be recognized and referred on an emergency basis to a hand surgeon for potential immediate operative repair.

A Rolando fracture is similar to a Bennett fracture; however, it is comminuted and by definition extends into the joint space. ED management is identical to that for a Bennett fracture.

Distal Phalanx Fractures

The most common distal phalanx fracture is a tuft fracture, and nail bed injuries are the most common complication of this fracture.2 There is some controversy regarding the need to repair nail bed injuries; however, most authors recommend performing trephination only for nail bed hematomas involving 30% to 50% or greater of the nail bed surface. When the nail bed is involved, tuft fractures are considered open fractures. Although some physicians prescribe antibiotics empirically, evidence suggests that prophylactic antibiotics are not indicated.4 Proximal distal phalanx fractures are often unstable and require hand surgeon referral for percutaneous wire placement. An attempt to reduce any rotational deformity or angulation should be made before splinting. Splinting should isolate the DIP joint alone.