176 Fungal Infections
• Fungi can cause significant human disease.
• Human fungal infection is overwhelmingly caused by the following organisms: Aspergillus, Blastomyces, Candida, Coccidioides, Cryptococcus, Histoplasma, Paracoccidioides, Sporothrix, and Zygomycetes.
• Fungal infection rates have dramatically increased after the arrival of improved diagnostic capabilities and a growing population of immunosuppressed patients.
• Invasive fungal infections carry an extremely high mortality rate, and recognition with rapid treatment by an observant emergency physician prevents morbidity.
General Epidemiology
The risk of fungal infections is tied to both geography and immune status. Immunocompromised individuals are exponentially more likely to suffer from fungal infection. Immunocompetent patients do acquire significant, often invasive fungal disease, especially in endemic areas. In 3 counties in the southwestern United States, coccidioidomycosis in immunocompetent patients who were more 65 years old occurred with an incidence of 40 in 100,000. In addition to the best-known endemic areas, smaller areas in Africa and Asia are known to harbor pockets with high rates of infection. Fungal infections are a scourge in hospitals, and they account for significant numbers of nosocomial infections. Previously published data showed that 10% of all nosocomial infections were fungal,1 and Candida was responsible for 85% of those infections.2
Presenting Signs and Symptoms
No specific presenting signs or symptoms are pathognomonic of fungal infection. Certain patient populations are more likely to contract fungal infections (Table 176.1).
PATIENT RISK FACTOR | COMMON FUNGAL INFECTION |
---|---|
Human immunodeficiency virus infection (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) | Candidiasis, cryptococcosis, aspergillosis |
Recent organ transplantation | Candidiasis, aspergillosis |
Neutropenia | Candidiasis, aspergillosis |
High-dose steroids | Zygomycosis, candidiasis |
Recent antibiotic treatment | Candidiasis |
Diabetes | Candidiasis, zygomycosis |
Recent or ongoing hospitalization | Candidiasis, aspergillosis |
Recent abdominal surgery or burns (especially with intensive care unit stay) | Candidiasis |
Travel to endemic area | Histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis |
Organ-Specific Clinical Findings
Pulmonary Disorders
Patients with fungal pneumonia present similarly to patients with other types of pneumonia. They have fever, dry or productive cough, fatigue, shortness of breath, or hemoptysis. The chest radiographic appearance also resembles that of other pneumonias. No specific finding is associated with particular fungal infections; lobar and interstitial infiltrates are both common. Certain fungal infections occasionally manifest with visible masslike lesions (e.g., blastomycosis, aspergillosis), and other infections form cavitary lesions (e.g., sporotrichosis), but these are the exception and not the rule. Fungal pneumonia causes varying symptoms and radiologic appearances. In one review,3 aspergillosis was the most common fungal cause of pneumonia in patients with cancer. Other reviews reported aspergillosis as the most common cause of pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. Healthy, immunocompetent individuals are overwhelmingly more likely to have one of the endemic fungal infections.
Sepsis
Fungal sepsis is rare, but it is highly fatal. The Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) trial4 demonstrated a fungal sepsis mortality rate of nearly 56% that was more than double the nonfungal sepsis mortality rate of 28% to 30%. Suspicion is necessary to identify these patients early. A patient with a history of recent hospitalization, immunosuppression from organ transplants, or abdominal surgery has a dramatically increased risk of disseminated fungal infection causing sepsis. Cultures with specific fungal organism media should be sent, followed by initiation of antifungal therapy.
Cutaneous Disorders
The most common fungal infections in humans are the superficial cutaneous fungal infections (e.g., tinea), which are detailed in Chapter 184. Certain fungal species may start as cutaneous lesions and disseminate to invasive disease, or they may begin as pulmonary disease and disseminate to form cutaneous lesions. The latter type is a form of blastomycosis characterized by a primary pulmonary infection that spreads, leading to cutaneous lesions in 75% of patients with disseminated disease. Sporotrichosis behaves similarly, but in an opposite fashion, because most patients with disseminated disease initially have cutaneous lesions. Both infections manifest as raised verrucous lesions with irregular borders that are painless and are often seen on the face or neck. Either infection can develop into the verrucous form or can become an extremity ulcer. Potassium hydroxide (KOH) scraping identifies these lesions as fungal.
Specific Fungal Infections
Blastomycosis
Blastomycosis is caused by the fungus Blastomyces dermatitidis. This infection occurs primarily in healthy individuals who are exposed in one of the endemic areas (Table 176.2). Pulmonary infections are typical, especially in the acute phase, and are contracted though inhalation of the dormant form. After attaining body temperature, the organism transforms into the yeast form and develops a greater ability to infect. Many patients acquire the infection and have chronic pneumonia for years, often diagnosed as reactive airway disease, before the infection is discovered. Patients with chronic pulmonary infections often develop extrapulmonary manifestations of the disease. These patients frequently have cutaneous lesions, and frank meningitis occurs in 10% of disseminated cases. If CNS involvement is suspected, a simple lumbar puncture is inadequate because results are routinely negative; ventricular fluid collection is required to confirm the diagnosis.
FUNGUS | ENDEMIC AREA |
---|---|
Coccidioides | Southwestern United States |
Blastomyces | Mississippi, St. Lawrence, and Ohio River valleys |
Histoplasma | Mississippi and Ohio River valleys |
Priority Actions
Differential Diagnosis
Shortness of Breath or Productive Cough?
Does the patient have evidence of pneumonia that did not respond to antibiotics?
Organ or Bone Graft Transplant Patient with a Fever?
Does the fever have another cause? Is the patient hemodynamically stable?
Coccidioidomycosis
Treatment of coccidioidomycosis is not always necessary because the infection often resolves without intervention. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) reported5 that no evidence indicated that treating the mild form of pneumonia reduces morbidity or prevents chronic infection. Therefore, the recommendations are to treat only the following groups: immunocompromised patients, patients with severe pneumonia, and patients with suspected high inoculum loads such as after laboratory accidents. Certain ethnic groups, individuals with African or Filipino ancestry, are at greater risk of disseminated infection and should be considered more thoroughly for treatment. The precise definition of severe pneumonia is left to the physician’s judgment. Therapeutic options are similar to those in other fungal diseases, with azole therapy as first-line treatment. Some literature suggests a benefit of itraconazole over fluconazole.3 Both drugs are associated with considerable relapse rates in chronic disease, and this is why a 3-month course of therapy is recommended. Disseminated disease may still be treated with the azoles if the patient is not immunocompromised. Patients with life-threatening cases require amphotericin. Patients with CNS involvement were traditionally treated with intrathecal amphotericin B. More recently, this approach was challenged by using high-dose azole therapy, and response rates were high, at 60% to 90%. However, cure was not observed, only suppression, and current thought is that a combination of intrathecal amphotericin B and intravenous azole therapy will work best.
Aspergillosis
Therapy for invasive aspergillosis traditionally consisted of amphotericin B, but reported cure rates were as low as 40%. In 2002, a randomized study comparing voriconazole with amphotericin B demonstrated a significantly higher survival rate of 71% versus 58%, respectively.6 The study also reported an unfortunately high rate of adverse events that occurred with amphotericin B therapy in 24% of the trial participants, almost double the 13% rate in the voriconazole-treated group. The IDSA recommended voriconazole as first-line treatment for invasive disease in their most recent guidelines.7
Cryptococcosis
Cryptococcus neoformans is an arboreal fungus found worldwide, with a predilection for the excrement of certain bird species, particularly pigeons. This disease was described in the 1950s to be similar to tuberculosis in terms of progression of disease in healthy individuals. Currently, Cryptococcus rarely infects immunocompetent individuals and is mainly linked to morbidity in HIV-infected individuals. Before the AIDS epidemic, infection rates were 0.8 per million in persons who were not infected with HIV. These rates spiked to 66 per 100,000 in patients with advanced HIV infection and then dropped again in that population with the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Although Cryptococcus is not responsible for significant disease in otherwise healthy individuals, it is known to cause widespread asymptomatic colonization. Most adults have serum antibodies to Cryptococcus. A study of children in New York City demonstrated seroconversion before the age of 10 years.8
Treatment should begin immediately in ill-appearing patients, even before lumbar puncture. The current literature points to combination therapy for CNS cryptococcosis in immunocompromised patients. Randomized trials showed that flucytosine, in combination with either amphotericin B or fluconazole, is superior to any single agent. In less severe infection such as symptomatic pneumonia in healthy individuals, oral fluconazole as monotherapy is sufficient. Revised IDSA recommendations include newer liposomal amphotericin formulations found to be effective in severe disease. Details regarding amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC), L-amphotericin B, and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD) are beyond the scope of this text.9
Candidiasis
Treatment of invasive disease is much different from treatment of mucocutaneous infection. Candida can infect any organ system and has become a deadly cause of sepsis. It is now one of the top five causative organisms in sepsis. Candida sepsis has a mortality rate of 50%. Many of these cases are nosocomial, and Candida is responsible for approximately 9% of all nosocomial infections. Along with immunocompromised patients, patients with burns, patients with recent abdominal surgery, newborns, and patients receiving total parental nutrition are at risk for invasive candidiasis. Traditional treatment of disseminated candidiasis has been with amphotericin B, but intravenous fluconazole was equally effective in randomized trials in neutropenic patients. The IDSA guidelines stated that either drug may be used. Patients with recent azole exposure may have developed resistant organisms, and caspofungin should be added to the initial therapy.10 No convincing studies exist to prove the value of initial treatment of septic immunocompromised patients with antifungal agents, although multiple guidelines have suggested that septic patients who are at high risk for candidemia may benefit from empiric antifungal therapy. Less invasive forms of candidiasis are much more prevalent and are commonly seen in EDs.
Medication
Antifungal therapy is the primary treatment for known or suspected fungal infections. Current therapy is transitioning from amphotericin B toward more potent forms of azole medications. Amphotericin B has been used for decades for nearly every type of fungal infection and is still recommended primarily in certain situations. Because of the many situations that call for antifungal therapy, recommending one particular drug over another is impossible. A newer generation of azole medications, the triazoles, is supplanting amphotericin. These medications, including voriconazole and fluconazole, have shown superior rates of improvement and cure compared with amphotericin B. In the most serious infections such as systemic aspergillosis and zygomycosis, voriconazole and posaconazole have been directly compared with amphotericin B and have had higher cure rates and lower side effects.11 In less serious, but symptomatic infections, fluconazole is superior or equal to amphotericin B, with a dramatically lower side effect profile.
1 Jarvis WR. Nosocomial outbreaks: the Centers for Disease Control’s Hospital Infections Program experience, 1980-1990. Epidemiology Branch, Hospital Infections Program. Am J Med. 1991;91:101S–106S.
2 Trick WE, Fridkin SK, Edwards JR, et al. Secular trend of hospital-acquired candidemia among intensive care unit patients in the United States during 1989-1999. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:627–630.
3 Pound MW, Drew RH, Perfect JR. Recent advances in the epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of fungal pneumonia. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2002;15:183–194.
4 Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, et al. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:699–709.
5 Galgiani JN, Ampel NM, Blair JE, et al. Coccidioidomycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:1217–1223.
6 Denning DW, Ribaud P, Milpied N, et al. Efficacy and safety of voriconazole in the treatment of acute invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:563–571.
7 Walsh T, Anaissie E. Treatment of aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:327–360.
8 Goldman DL, Khine H, Abadi J, et al. Serologic evidence for Cryptococcus neoformans infection in early childhood. Pediatrics. 2001;107:E66.
9 Perfect J, Dismukes W. Practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease. Clin Infect Dis. 50, 2010. 291–232
10 Pappas P, Kaufman C. Guidelines for treatment of candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:503–535.
11 Aperis G, Mylonakis E. Newer triazole antifungal agents: pharmacology, spectrum, clinical efficacy and limitations. Expert Opin Invest Drugs. 2006;15:579–602.