Feeds and growth

Published on 07/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Neonatal - Perinatal Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 7721 times

Chapter 9. Feeds and growth
It is now clear that nutrition and growth, both as a fetus and in the early weeks of postnatal life, may have major implications on long-term health. The concept of programming suggests that cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease as well as insulin resistance and diabetes may have an early origin in some individuals and there is a small amount of evidence to suggest that premature infants may be more vulnerable to this early programming than are other, more mature infants. Infants who are born small for gestational age are at risk of developing later risk factors for cardiovascular disease, such as high blood pressure. Promotion of postnatal growth was thought to ameliorate these effects, but there is now evidence in human infants and other animals born prematurely that promotion of growth by increased postnatal nutrition increases later cardiovascular risk. It would therefore seem crucial that while preterm and small for gestation age infants should be fed appropriately, they should not be ‘over fed’ in the neonatal period. 2
Once enteral feeding has been established, the most common problem seen on a day-to-day basis is gastro-oesophageal reflux. A recent paper documented that 25% of all extremely low birth weight (<1 kg) infants are discharged home from the neonatal unit on treatment for reflux. 3 The diagnosis and management of reflux remains a subject of considerable debate with a relative lack of strong consistent evidence.
This chapter aims to cover the common problems described above as well as other topics such as nutritional supplementation.

QUESTION 1

i) A baby is reviewed in clinic and his mother describes episodes of vomiting post feeds and says that he seems uncomfortable. She has tried positioning the baby after feeds but feels this has not made any difference. A friend has said that her baby has gastro-oesophageal reflux and she has been extensively reviewing this subject on the internet. She would like you to discuss the pros and cons of the following investigations for GOR.

a. pH probe
b. Oesophageal manometry
c. Oesophageal impedance
d. Fluoroscopy
e. Endoscopy
f. Chiropractice
g. Empiric therapy.
ii) Mother elects to have empiric treatment. Which of the following treatments would you suggest?

a. Cisapride
b. Gaviscon
c. Gripe water
d. Antacids
e. Thickeners
f. Hydrolysed formula milk
g. Erythromycin
h. Ranitidine
i. Metoclopramide
j. Omeprazole
k. Domperidone
l. Buscopan (hyoscine butylbromide)
m. Coleif
n. Infacol.

QUESTION 2

Match the following milks and ingredients/uses

Infatrini Milk protein, soy and lactose free
Nutramigen Gluten free
Neocate Gluten, sucrose and lactose free
Infasoy Disaccharide/whole protein intolerance with medium-chain triglycerides
Peptijunior Lactose intolerance, galactosaemia

QUESTION 3

Which of the following statements about iron and its supplementation are correct?

i) Maternal iron deficiency affects 30–50% of pregnancies
ii) Maternal iron deficiency anaemia is associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery
iii) Maternal smoking can cause perinatal iron deficiency
iv) Maternal diabetes can cause perinatal iron deficiency
v) Iron supplementation prevents early anaemia
vi) Can lead to an increased risk of infection
vii) Should be given at the same time as calcium and phosphorus supplements
viii) Can be started safely at about 4–6 weeks of life
ix) Is only needed in infants fed formula milk
x) Supplements should be started immediately after birth
xi) Iron deficiency can lead to problems with neurodevelopment which are reversed once treatment is started.

QUESTION 4

Which of the following are risk factors for NEC?

i) Early feeds
ii) Indomethacin
iii) Blood transfusion
iv) Fortified feeds
v) Thickened feeds
vi) H2 receptor antagonists.

QUESTION 5

Which of the following statements concerning feeds and feed supplements are correct?

i) All preterm formula fed infants should receive folic acid
ii) Infants with haemolytic anaemia should always receive folate supplementation
iii) Human milk contains sufficient vitamin A for the preterm infant
iv) Vitamin A supplementation is associated with a reduction in the incidence of chronic lung disease
v) All preterm infants should receive a minimum of 1000 IU vitamin D a day to prevent rickets
vi) Vitamin supplementation should be increased in hepatic failure
vii) Rickets can be prevented by adequate vitamin D supplementation
viii) Increasing calcium intake is usually helpful when there is evidence of poor bone mineralisation
ix) Nucleotide supplementation of formula milk may enhance growth in preterm infants
x) Human milk does not contain nucleotides
xi) Beta-carotene supplementation is of proven benefit in preterm babies
xii) Vitamin E supplementation is essential in infants receiving human milk
xiii) Vitamin E supplementation is useful in the prevention of haemolytic anaemia, ROP, BPD and IVH
xiv) Vitamin C levels in preterm infants are normally satisfactory and supplementation is not recommended
xv) The vitamin content of breast milk is affected by maternal diet.

QUESTION 6

You have admitted a baby to the neonatal unit who is 30 weeks gestation. The baby requires no respiratory support and her blood glucose is stable. The mother wants to breast feed and the practice on your unit is to give bolus feeds.
The mother wants to know why the baby cannot be fed continuously as she has heard about necrotising enterocolitis and is worried her baby may develop it if the baby is fed by bolus feeds. What do you tell her?

QUESTION 7

You review a 4-month-old baby in clinic who you have been treating for reflux with thickened feeds and erythromycin. The mother has been researching on the internet and thinks her child may actually be allergic to cows’ milk but then talks about protein intolerance.

i) Is this a plausible explanation for the symptoms?
ii) How do you explain the difference between CMA and CMPI?
iii) What is the prognosis for both conditions?
The mother wants her baby tested for cows’ milk allergy.

iv) What investigations do you carry out?
She wants to try soy milk as alternative milk. She has heard that it is good for the regurgitation and crying that her baby suffers with.

v) What do you tell her?
vi) Do you alter your treatment of the baby? If so, what do you do?

QUESTION 8

Which of the following are true?

i) Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids improve retinal sensitivity in preterm infants
ii) LCPUFA enriched formula milk can decrease the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia
iii) LCPUFA enriched formula milk leads to a decrease in the incidence of sepsis
iv) A protein intake of above 3 g/kg/day is needed to support the same rate of growth as in utero for a preterm baby
v) Amino acids in total parenteral nutrition should be started on day 3 after renal function has improved to prevent elevation in blood urea nitrogen (BUN)
vi) The addition of glutamine improves feeding tolerance in ELBW infants
vii) The addition of glutamine may decrease the incidence of infection in ELBW infants.

ANSWER 1

i)

a. pH probe study. This is a simple bedside test that gives reproducible data. Oesophagitis may be predictable and comparative data may be produced. However acid reflux only will be detected and there is evidence that up to 90% of GOR is due to milk or gas and is not acid. Normal values have only been established for term infants and cannot be applied to preterm infants. Furthermore the upper limit of acceptable reflux index (12%) is substantially higher than that regarded as acceptable in adults or older children (6%). Studies have shown poor correlation between pH probe reflux and symptoms. Infants should not be receiving antacids, H2 antagonists or proton pump inhibitors.
b. Oesophageal manometry. Allows assessment of motility and an understanding of the pathophysiology of GOR and of sphincter function. This tends to be used only in specialist centres as both operation and evaluation of results are complex. There is no role for this method in normal practice.
c. Oesophageal impedance. Allows detection of acid and non-acid events with an immediate result (in comparison to the delay with pH probe). Normal values are not available in either preterm or term infants and analysis is time consuming. As with pH probes there is poor correlation between episodes of reflux and symptoms. The predictive value for different treatments is not established.
d. Fluoroscopy. Allows visualisation of sucking and swallowing activity, structural anatomy and brief episodes of reflux. Studies are of short duration and episodes of reflux may be seen in normal and asymptomatic infants. It should not be used to evaluate the severity of reflux but has a role in the exclusion of other problems that may mimic reflux.
e. Endoscopy. Permits visualisation of areas of oesophagitis and biopsy if necessary. Requires considerable expertise particularly if biopsy is considered and especially in a preterm baby. An infant will require heavy sedation or anaesthesia.
f. Chiropractice. This has been recommended by several groups although evidence is lacking to support this therapy in this condition.
g. Empiric treatment. The commonest means of assessment. Not associated with the risk of other investigations but does carry a risk as does use of any medication. Effect is difficult to evaluate as a large placebo effect is associated with use of any medication in a condition associated with parental anxiety. Appropriate doses and associated risks are not clearly defined.
ii) There is a lack of evidence of efficacy and safety for all medications and none can be recommended routinely in the absence of evidence to suggest that GOR is the cause of symptoms. As several studies have failed to demonstrate such an association an argument could be made that none of these agents are appropriate. There are, however, specific considerations with some of these agents.

a. Cisapride. Prokinetic agent without central anti-dopamine effects which directly stimulate the myenteric plexus. In infants born under 36 weeks gestation, cisapride should not be used for up to 3 months, due to the risk of Q–T interval prolongation in this age group.
b. Gaviscon. A compound alginate preparation that forms a raft that floats on the surface of the stomach contents to reduce reflux. Contains sodium and magnesium alginate. Half sachet=1 dose=1 mmol Na.
c. Gripe water. A variety of products are marketed as ‘gripe water’ and all contain different ingredients – ginger, fennel, essential oils, peppermint, chamomile, caraway, aloe, lemon balm and activated charcoal just to name a few. All claim to bring immediate relief and many claim to be recommended by health care professionals. Supportive evidence is missing.
d. Antacids. Should not be used due to complications such as constipation (calcium- and aluminium-containing antacids), diarrhoea (magnesium-containing antacids), and metabolic bone disease (aluminium-containing antacids which bind to phosphate).
e. Thickeners. The number of reflux episodes may be decreased in term infants by adding a thickener to the milk to increase viscosity. In preterm babies or babies who are sick, thickened milk may lead to difficulties with sucking or swallowing. In these cases, simply increasing the concentration of the feed slightly may lead to less gastric distension, which in turn would decrease the likelihood of reflux, while maintaining calorie intake.
f. Hydrolysed formula. There is evidence that cows’ milk allergy can be indistinguishable from gastro-oesophageal reflux. Therefore, a trial of a hydrolysed formula (partially hydrolysed feed also known as semi-elemental, e.g. Nutramigen) may be beneficial in a baby who is showing symptoms of reflux and irritability. Improvement is usually seen within 1 week of changing the milk.
g. Erythromycin. This is used for its pro-kinetic effects but has no effect on oesophageal motility or on the lower oesophageal sphincter. May improve gastro-duodenal contractility in babies older than 33 weeks. Randomised controlled trials have not confirmed efficacy. It has been associated with an increased incidence of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.
i. Metoclopramide. Dopamine antagonist with prokinetic effect upon the gut. It also enhances the strength of the oesophageal sphincter action. Lack of proven benefit and well recognised extra-pyramidal side effects including oculo-gyric crises mean use is not recommended.
j. Omeprazole. Proton-pump inhibitor with superior acid reducing effect when compared with the H2 receptor antagonists. Also metabolised by the cytochrome P450 pathway and there is a genetically determined defect in the pathway that impairs metabolism in some individuals. This may affect both efficacy of treatment and potential toxicity. Problems with reducing gastric acid production include promotion of bacterial overgrowth, increased risk of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis due to increased serum gastrin, and altered digestion due to decreased activity of acid-dependent lipases.
k. Domperidone. Also a dopamine antagonist, principally active in the gastrointestinal tract and prokinetic in the upper gut. It is less likely to cause extra-pyramidal side effects as it does not cross the blood–brain barrier. Efficacy not established.
l. Buscopan. Antimuscarinic that is primarily used for smooth muscle spasm in the gut. Should not be used in children or neonates as the risk of side effects is high.
m. Colief. Lactase – this theoretically reduces symptoms when lactose intolerance contributes to colic. Anecdotally may be highly effective in selected infants. No convincing experimental data.
n. Infacol. Simeticone (activated dimeticone) – which is a foaming agent and works in a similar way to Gaviscon, although evidence for benefit is uncertain.

ANSWER 2

Infatrini – gluten free
Nutramigen – gluten, sucrose and lactose free
Neocate – milk protein, soy and lactose free
Infasoy – lactose intolerance, galactosaemia
Peptijunior – disaccharide/whole protein intolerance with medium-chain triglycerides.

ANSWER 3

i) Yes4– it is the commonest cause of perinatal iron deficiency worldwide.
ii) Yes – iron deficiency anaemia, when detected early in pregnancy, is associated with a more than two-fold increase for the risk of preterm delivery. 4
iii) Yes – maternal smoking can cause perinatal iron deficiency. Smoking leads to increased carbon monoxide and decreased utero-placental blood flow. This in turn leads to erythropoiesis which depletes the iron stores. 5
iv) Yes – poorly controlled maternal diabetes can cause perinatal iron deficiency by increased fetal metabolic rate and oxygen consumption. The relative hypoxia again causes increased erythropoiesis and the additional iron required cannot be met by increasing maternal–fetal transport. 6
v) No – does prevent late anaemia. Use of erythropoietin and iron can result in a better response to iron
vi) Yes – iron supplements have a high osmolality if given undiluted and if mixed with breast milk can cause disruption of anti-infective properties. Parenteral iron is more likely to do so.
vii) No – insoluble compounds may be formed which would decrease bioavailability.
viii) Yes – most preterm babies have received multiple blood transfusions while in the neonatal unit, and have thus received intravenous iron. They are likely to have extremely high ferritin levels and thus iron supplements can be delayed.
ix) No – human milk has inadequate supplies of iron and preterm infants fed human milk are more likely to suffer from iron deficiency.
x) No – it is generally recommended that iron supplements should not be given in the first 4 weeks after birth when enteral feeds have only just begun as it may be associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal disturbance.
xi) No – iron deficiency between 6 months and 2 years can lead to long-term neurodevelopmental problems that are not reversed despite adequate treatment. 7 Iron is needed for neurotransmission, myelination and brain growth. Areas such as the hippocampus and striatum are particularly vulnerable to iron deficiency. Studies have shown both short- and long-term effects due to perinatal iron deficiency. 8

ANSWER 4

i) Several studies have shown that it is safe to use small feeding volumes early in life, even in selected circumstances, such as feeding during the use of indomethacin to treat symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus. Prolonging small feeding volumes, sometimes called trophic feeding, has been shown to be associated with a marginally significant reduction in necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Review concluded that, comparing trophic feeds with no enteral nutrient intake, there was no significant difference in necrotising enterocolitis, infants required more days to reach full enteral feeding and tended to have a longer hospital stay. 9.10. and 11.
ii) Patent ductus arteriosus is a risk factor for the development of necrotising enterocolitis. The use of indomethacin to treat patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants may either decrease the incidence of necrotising enterocolitis by stabilising or closing the ductus arteriosus or increase its incidence by a direct constricting effect on mesenteric blood vessels. Although some small studies have suggested that indomethacin does increase the risk of NEC, recent papers have concluded that PDA is an independent risk factor for the development of necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants and therapy with indomethacin did not have a significant effect on the risk for necrotising enterocolitis. 12. and 13.
iii) While anecdotal reports suggest that NEC has developed quickly after a blood transfusion, this information is not reflected in published studies. However, neonatal exchange transfusion and intrauterine transfusion have been shown to be associated with an increased incidence of NEC. Blood transfusions may unmask latent NEC, and apnoeas and desaturations could potentially be an early symptom of NEC. It may be that the anaemia for which a blood transfusion is requested is an independent risk factor for NEC, or an early manifestation of NEC still developing, which then becomes recognised several hours later (during or after the transfusion). Some units omit feeds for the duration of a blood transfusion. There are several reports of blood transfusion causing acute haemolysis in babies with established NEC and red cell T antigen activation although the use of low anti-T titre plasma products has not been shown to reduce mortality and the current neonatal transfusion guidelines remain non-committal about the importance of T activation.
iv) Fortified feeds – many neonatal units are routinely using milk fortifier to enhance the nutrition and growth of preterm infants. It is thought that breast milk fortifier may increase the incidence of NEC stage I–III. 14
Berseth et al15 compared two human milk fortifiers, one with iron and one with without, showing that there was no difference in the incidence of sepsis and NEC. This refutes the premise that the inclusion of iron in fortifiers increases the incidence of sepsis and NEC.

v) Thickened feeds – although descriptive case reports have linked some feeding interventions such as thickened feedings to NEC, there is no evidence to establish a causal relation. There are however several anecdotal reports of infants being fed with thickened feeds and later developing NEC. The theory is that thickened feeds may have led to NEC as a result of bowel obstruction with subsequent bacterial overgrowth or following direct mucosal injury by calorifie dense milk. 16. and 17.
vi) A recent case-control study of NEC of Bell stage II or greater showed a higher incidence if treated with ranitidine. This may support the hypothesis that gastric pH level may be a factor in the pathogenesis of NEC. 18

ANSWER 5

i) Although this remains common practice and is recommended in certain textbooks, the composition of current formula milk is sufficient for adequate supplementation. Human breast milk contains approximately twice the minimum folate supplementation in formula milk.
ii) Although this practice has been recommended, this is based upon old studies when folate levels in milk were almost certainly inadequate. Evidence to suggest that this practice should be continued is conflicting and the composition of current formula milk and breast milk is sufficient for adequate supplementation.
iii) Human milk does not supply enough vitamin A for the preterm infant and this situation is compounded by the fact that most preterm infants are born with low stores. Supplementation is recommended but the exact dose is uncertain.
iv) Systematic review has suggested that vitamin A supplementation may lead to a reduction in both supplementary oxygen requirements and death. Treatment regimes have involved intramuscular injection and the treatment has not gained widespread acceptance. Some studies have not shown evidence of benefit.
v) There is good evidence that supplementation of 400 IU vitamin D a day is adequate and higher doses are not required.
vi) Infants with liver failure should be on higher vitamin supplementations including vitamin K.
vii) Radiological rickets may be found in infants with normal vitamin D levels. Hypophosphataemia is now recognised as a more important contributory factor than vitamin D.
viii) Calcium supplementation may be beneficial if intake is poor, but is unlikely to be effective if intake is already adequate. High calcium intake may decrease fat absorption and can lead to calcium soap intestinal bolus obstruction.
ix) There is evidence that babies can utilise preformed nucleotides in supplemented formula milks and that utilisation increases at times of deficiency. Studies in term infants have shown improved growth and reduced gastrointestinal disturbance but this benefit has not been shown in preterm infants.
x) Breast milk contains at least 15 different nucleotides which represent a significant proportion of the non-protein nitrogen. It is for this reason that supplementation of formula feeds has been suggested.
xi) Beta-carotene supplementation of milk is now common. This is almost certainly because of an absence of carotenoids in formula milk which are present in human milk. Beta-carotene is only one of these. Although supplementation is now common, there is no clear information as to what it is supposed to do and currently no evidence of benefit from randomised controlled trials exists.
xii) Human milk contains adequate levels of vitamin E and there is no evidence that supplementation is of additional benefit.
xiii) Vitamin E supplementation may be useful in the prevention of haemolytic anaemia in preterm infants but there is no consistent advice on this. Although it has been suggested and given to prevent ROP, BPD and IVH, there is no evidence of benefit from randomised trials and supplementation with high doses has risks of potential toxicity. A Cochrane Review in 2003 concluded that vitamin E supplementation in preterm infants reduced the risk of IVH but increased the risk of sepsis including NEC. The evidence does not support the routine use of vitamin E supplementation by intravenous route at high doses. 19
xiv) Vitamin C levels are usually low and supplementation is recommended. Standard multivitamin preparations contain vitamins A, B, C and D.
xv) Levels of water-soluble vitamins in breast milk are influence by dietary changes and breast feeding mothers should be encouraged to eat fruit and vegetables. Routine supplementation with proprietary vitamin preparations is not normally necessary for the mother.

ANSWER 6

Most premature infants are unable to suck effectively or co-ordinate sucking, swallowing and breathing. She must initially be fed by a nasogastric tube to give milk feeds. Milk can be given by tube either intermittently, typically over 10–20 minutes every hour, progressing up to every two or three hours, or continuously, using an infusion pump. Although theoretical benefits and risks of each method have been proposed, the effects on clinical outcomes are not certain. A Cochrane Review in 2003 summarised the differences in outcomes which were feeding tolerance, days to reach full enteral feeding, growth, length of stay and incidence of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC). 20
It concluded that infants fed by continuous tube feeding took longer to reach full enteral feeds, but there was a slight trend towards earlier discharge. There was however no difference in weight gain or growth including length, head circumference and skin fold thickness. To reassure this mother, there was no difference in the incidence of NEC.

ANSWER 7

i) This is a plausible explanation. It is thought that up to half the cases of gastro-oesophageal reflux in infants under a year of age may be associated with cows’ milk allergy. It is also thought that the reflux may be induced by the allergy. 21 The association has been well described by several groups, one quoting it in up to 42% of infants who previously had received a diagnosis of reflux. 22 The symptoms and age of presentation are similar in both conditions. One group treated a group of infants with reflux who had not responded to pharmacological treatment with a cows’ milk free diet – 20% improved. 23 The overlapping symptoms include crying, irritability, vomiting, failure to thrive, apnoeas, ALTEs and colic.A recent paper has said that umbilical erythema can be a sign of food intolerance and a useful diagnostic tool for CMPI. 24
ii) Many people use the terms cows’ milk allergy (CMA) and cows’ milk protein intolerance (CMPI) interchangeably.CMA is an immunologically mediated reaction to cows’ milk proteins that can involve the gut, skin, respiratory tract, or cause systemic anaphylaxis. prevalence is about 1–3%, being most common in infants.CMPI, however, should refer to a non-immunological reaction to cows’ milk. The most common cause is lactase deficiency, which is mostly acquired during late childhood or adulthood. It has marked racial variation with lowest incidence in northern Europeans.
iii) The prognosis for true cows’ milk allergy is worse than for CMPI. It can cause severe morbidity and even fatality if not recognised and treated. Dietary elimination is associated with good prognosis.CMPI, commonly due to a lactase deficiency, is generally a benign condition, with symptoms limited to the gastro-intestinal tract. 25
iv) There are no definitive investigations for cows’ milk protein intolerance or allergy because in general the immunological basis of the involved mechanisms is commonly undetermined. Some tests, however, may reinforce clinical suspicions. Cavataio et al found that IgG anti-beta-lactoglobulin assay was the most useful test for making a diagnosis of both gastro-oesophageal reflux and cows’ milk allergy. The test was positive in 27/30 subjects with GER and CMA and in 4/42 patients with GER only. 26 Generally a diagnosis is made if there is resolution of symptoms with elimination.
v) Concerns have recently been raised regarding potential risks with soy protein. Most recent advice is to use soy protein formulae only in certain cases. They should not be used in preterm infants or infants with food allergy before the age of 6 months.Soy protein formulae can be used for feeding term infants, but they have no nutritional advantage over cows’ milk protein formulae and contain high concentrations of phytate, aluminium and phytoestrogens (isoflavones), which may have side effects.There is no evidence supporting the use of soy protein formulae for the prevention or management of infantile colic, regurgitation, or prolonged crying. 27. and 28.
vi) As this baby is not responding to your usual treatment of reflux, it may well be worth trying a cows’ milk free diet due to the overlap of symptoms in these conditions.The baby should be started on an extensively hydrolysed formula milk of which there are many on the market, such as Peptijunior, Nutramigen, Neocate or Progestamil. A 6–8-week course should be tried as a minimum for resolution of symptoms. These milks can also be thickened if regurgitation symptoms persist.

ANSWER 8

i) True – LCPUFA are concentrated at synapses within the retina and there is improved retinal sensitivity and visual acuity with LCPUFA added to formula milk.
ii) False – although one study did show that infants fed with an enriched formula had longer duration of ventilation, 29 there has been no difference shown in the rates of BPD in this group of babies compared to controls. 30
iii) False – many trials have reported no difference in sepsis in babies fed with LCPUFA enriched formula milk. 29
iv) True – the most commonly applied standard is that of intra-uterine growth. The protein accretion rate between 24 and 32 weeks’ gestation is approximately 2 g/kg/day, and the estimated rate of obligate protein loss is 1.1–1.5 g/kg/day.
v) False – generally TPN and amino acid solutions are started later in the most sick and preterm infants who are in greatest need of nutrition. Concerns usually raised are problems with acid–base balance and an increase in BUN and ammonia levels. However, studies have shown that there is no difference in plasma levels of cholesterol, triglycerides, bicarbonate, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine and pH in infants with early TPN compared to late (after 48 hours). 31 In early life BUN reflects fluid status rather than amino acid intake.
vi) False – glutamine is one of the most abundant amino acids in plasma and in breast milk, but is unstable in aqueous solutions, hence generally not included in amino acid solutions. Glutamine depletion has negative effects on the functional integrity of the gut and leads to immunosuppression. Glutamine-enriched enteral nutrition does not improve feeding tolerance in VLBW infants. 32
vii) True – studies in adults have shown that glutamine-supplemented amino acid solution decreased the incidence of infections. One study has suggested that the use of glutamine-enriched enteral nutrition in VLBW infants should be seriously considered. 32
REFERENCES
1. Kosloske, AM, Epidemiology of necrotising enterocolitis, Acta Paediatr Suppl 396 (1994) 27.
2. Singhal, A; Cole, TJ; Fewtrell, M; et al., Promotion of faster weight gain in infants born small for gestational age: is there an adverse effect on later blood pressure?Circulation 115 (2) ( 2007) 213220.
3. Malcolm W, Gantz M, Das A et al. Anti-reflux medications at NICU discharge for extremely low birthweight infants [abstract]. Presented at Annual Meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies, San Francisco, April 2006
4. Scholl, TO, Iron status during pregnancy: setting the stage for mother and infant, Am J Clin Nutr 81 (5) ( 2005) 1218S1222S.
5. Sweet, DG; Savage, G; Tubman, TR; et al., Study of maternal influences on fetal iron status at term using cord blood transferrin receptors, Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 84 (1) ( 2001) F40F43.
6. Petry, CD; Eaton, MA; Wobken, JD; et al., Iron deficiency of liver, heart, and brain in newborn infants of diabetic mothers, J Pediatr 121 (1) ( 1992) 109114.
7. Lozoff, B; Georgieff, MK, Iron deficiency and brain development, Semin Pediatr Neurol 13 (3) ( 2006) 158605.
8. Armony-Sivan, R; Eidelman, AI; Lanir, A; et al., Iron status and neurobehavioral development of premature infants, J Perinatol 24 (12) ( 2004) 757762.
9. Tyson, JE; Kennedy, KA, Trophic feedings for parenterally fed infants, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20 (3) ( 2005).
10. Berseth, CL; Bisquera, JA; Paje, VU, Prolonging small feeding volumes early in life decreases the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants, Pediatrics 111 (2003) 529534.
11. Berseth, CL, Feeding strategies and necrotizing enterocolitis, Curr Opin Pediatr 17 (2) ( 2005) 170173.
12. Dollberg, S; Lusky, A; Reichman, B, Patent ductus arteriosus, indomethacin and necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants: a population-based study, J Ped Gastroenterol Nutr 40 (2) ( 2005) 184188.
13. O’Donovan, D; Baetiong, A; Adams, K; et al., Necrotizing enterocolitis and gastrointestinal complications after indomethacin therapy and surgical ligation in premature infants with patent ductus arteriosus, J Perinatol 23 (2003) 286290.
14. Hallstrom, M; Koivisto, AM; Janas, M; et al., Frequency of and risk factors for necrotizing enterocolitis in infants born before 33 weeks of gestation, Acta Paediatr 92 (1) ( 2003) 111113.
15. Berseth, CL; Van Aerde, JE; Gross, S; et al., Growth, efficacy, and safety of feeding an iron-fortified human milk fortifier, Pediatrics 114 (6) ( 2004) e699e706.
16. Clarke, P; Robinson, MJ, Thickening milk feeds may cause necrotising enterocolitis, Arch Dis Child 89 (2004) F280.
17. Berseth, CL, Feeding strategies and necrotizing enterocolitis, Curr Opin Pediatr 17 (2) ( 2005) 170173.
18. Guillet, R; Stoll, BJ; Cotton, CM; et al., Association of H 2-blocker therapy and higher incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants, Pediatrics 117 (2) ( 2006) e137e142.
19. Brion, LP; Bell, EF; Raghuveer, TS, Vitamin E supplementation for prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants, Cochrane Database Syst Rev ( 4) ( 2003).
20. Premji, S; Chessell, L, Continuous nasogastric milk feeding versus intermittent bolus milk feeding for premature infants less than 1500 grams, Cochrane Database Syst Rev ( 1) ( 2003).
21. Salvatore, S; Vandenplas, Y, Gastroesophageal reflux and cow milk allergy: is there a link?Pediatrics 110 (5) ( 2002) 972984.
22. Iacono, G; Carroccio, A; Cavataio, F; et al., Gastroesophageal reflux and cow’s milk allergy in infants: a prospective study, J Allergy Clin Immunol 97 (3) ( 1996) 822827.
23. McLain, BI; Cameron, DJ; Barnes, GL, Is cow’s milk protein intolerance a cause of gastro-oesophageal reflux in infancy?J Paediatr Child Health 30 (4) ( 1994) 316318.
24. Iacono, G; Di Prima, L; D’Amico, D, The ‘red umbilicus’: a diagnostic sign of cow’s milk protein intolerance, J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 42 (5) ( 2006) 531534.
25. Bahna, SL, Cow’s milk allergy versus cow milk intolerance, Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 89 (6 Suppl 1) ( 2002) 5660.
26. Cavataio, F; Iacono, G; Montalto, G; et al., Gastroesophageal reflux associated with cow’s milk allergy in infants: which diagnostic examinations are useful?Am J Gastroenterol 91 (6) ( 1996) 12151220.
27. ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. Agostoni, C; Axelsson, I; Goulet, O; et al., Soy protein infant formulae and follow-on formulae: a commentary by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition, J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 42 (4) ( 2006) 352361.
28. Turck, D, Soy protein for infant feeding: what do we know?Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 10 (3) ( 2007) 360365.
29. Fewtrell, MS; Abbott, RA; Kennedy, K, Randomized, double-blind trial of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation with fish oil and borage oil in preterm infants, J Pediatr 144 (4) ( 2004) 471479.
30. Fewtrell, MS; Morley, R; Abbott, RA; et al., Double-blind, randomized trial of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in formula fed to preterm infants, Pediatrics 110 (1 Pt 1) ( 2002) 7382.
31. Ibrahim, HM; Jeroudi, MA; Baier, RJ; et al., Aggressive early total parental nutrition in low-birth-weight infants, J Perinatol 24 (8) ( 2004) 482486.
32. van den Berg, A; van Elburg, RM; Westerbeek, EA; et al., Glutamine-enriched enteral nutrition in very-low-birth-weight infants and effects on feeding tolerance and infectious morbidity: a randomized controlled trial, Am J Clin Nutr 81 (2005) 13971404.

Share this: