Facial Trauma

Published on 10/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2564 times

76 Facial Trauma

Perspective

A person’s face is the focal point of conversation and social interaction. Within the face is embodied each person’s mode of expression and communication. The face also has a receptive importance, with many special sensory functions of the body located within the facial structures. It is not surprising that facial disfigurement harbors the potential for both physical impairment and long-term psychologic sequelae.1,2

Death from facial trauma is rare, and the severity of facial injuries is often perceived by the patient to be out of proportion to the actual injury. The goal of the emergency physician (EP) is to secure the airway, identify the injury, preserve appearance, and consult with the appropriate surgeon to determine further treatment and follow-up.3 Although zygomatic and nasal fractures may occur in isolation, any fracture of the frontal bone and maxilla must raise suspicion for the possibility of associated facial fractures, intracranial injury, and concomitant cervical spine injury.47 Proper diagnosis and recognition of zygoma and nasal pathology are essential for maintenance of adequate cosmetic and physiologic function. Trauma involving the mandible, the strongest facial bone, may result in fracture or dislocation. Fifty percent of mandibular fractures occur at two or more locations because of its pseudo-ring shape. Detection of one fracture site should always prompt a search for a second fracture.8

General Anatomy

The major bones of the face create the defining features and include the frontal, nasal, zygoma, maxilla, mandible, and temporal bones. The orbit consists of the maxilla, zygoma, frontal, sphenoid, orbital, and lacrimal bones (Fig. 76.1).

The face is conventionally divided into thirds: upper, middle, and lower. The borders of each third are loosely defined by branches of the trigeminal nerve, which provides sensory innervation to the face. Identification of the exiting foramen for the distributing branches of the trigeminal nerve (cranial nerve V) is crucial when providing local nerve anesthesia (Fig. 76.2).

The facial nerve (cranial nerve VII) intricately courses through the parotid duct and provides parasympathetic innervation, special sensory function to the tongue and soft palate, and general motor function to the 44 muscles of facial expression. Deep facial lacerations between the tragus and lateral canthus may jeopardize the integrity of the facial nerve. Any damage to the facial nerve distal to the stylomastoid foramen can result in facial nerve dysfunction, commonly referred to as Bell palsy.

The parotid duct lies in a plane with the tragus and inferior corner of the nasal vestibule. Competency of the parotid duct must be considered in patients with deep lacerations in this region of the face (Fig. 76.3).9

The external carotid artery is the major vascular supply to the face. This vessel provides extensive collateral supply to the midline tissues through anastomosis (Fig. 76.4).10

Approach to Multitrauma Patients with Facial Injuries

The degree of tissue distortion following facial trauma should not dissuade the EP from addressing the initial treatment priorities in patients. Though uncommon, facial trauma can be a life-threatening insult, and the EP must address life-threatening injuries before evaluating the obvious facial injury. The mere presence of a facial fracture, particularly one involving the midface, greatly increases the risk for traumatic brain injury.11,12 The energy required to fracture the midface is often transmitted to the neurocranium, and such fractures are associated with a high incidence of brain death. In general, patients with facial fractures who do not survive have higher injury severity scores and lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores and consist of an older population. Other typical concomitant injuries include pulmonary contusions, abdominal injuries, and cervical spine injuries.13 The emergence of motor vehicle air bags has decreased patient mortality. However, increased concern is warranted for injuries to the orbits, globes, facial soft tissues, and temporomandibular joints, as well as cervical fractures of the posterior arches of C1 and C2.

The blood supply to the face consists of a complex system involving branches of the internal and external carotid arteries with several anastomoses between them. The majority of the facial vascular supply is via the internal maxillary artery, which originates from the external carotid. The internal maxillary artery passes between the Le Fort fracture lines and can be dissected with severe midface trauma.

Treatment of bleeding must begin with inspection of the airway and maintenance of its patency. Local hemorrhage may be controlled with posterior nasal packing or insertion of a Foley catheter into the nasopharynx and inflation with air. The catheter should be gently pulled anteriorly in an attempt to close the posterior choana. Temporary external reduction of fractures may also provide stabilization of arterial injuries. Finally, surgical ligation of the external carotid artery or transcatheter arterial embolization of the maxillary artery can be performed to effect hemostasis.14 Less obvious sources of serious blood loss must be monitored (scalp lacerations, nasal fractures, mandibular fractures) because persistent bleeding may lead to hypovolemia.15

Frontal Skull Injuries

Blunt Ophthalmic and Orbital Trauma

Pathophysiology

Trauma to the eye can result from falls, motor vehicle accidents, and direct blows from an assault or a projectile object (hockey puck, baseball). Serious eye injury has been shown to most commonly be associated with midface fractures.17,18 Ocular trauma can be divided into two broad categories: direct trauma to the globe and trauma to the orbit. Direct globe trauma ranges in severity from a benign corneal abrasion to rupture of the globe. Orbital trauma involves injuries such as benign contusions and fractures with complications to surrounding structures, including the globe and extraocular muscles.

Orbital fractures are classified as “impure” when the fracture line involves the orbital rim or as “pure” in the case of a fracture with no rim involvement. Compression of the optic nerve (ocular neuropathy) can be caused by displacement of a fracture, increased pressure from a retrobulbar hemorrhage, or optic nerve hemorrhage.19 Each of these processes has the potential to lead to rapidly progressive visual loss and is an ophthalmologic emergency.

The mechanism of orbital blowout fractures was investigated by Waterhouse et al. via the same principles as Le Fort a century earlier (see later).20 Waterhouse investigated the two possible mechanisms for an orbital blowout fracture, the hydraulic and buckling theories. The hydraulic mechanism occurs when the vector of the force directed onto an uninjured globe is transmitted to the fixed orbital walls; it results in a large fracture of the inferior or medial orbital wall, or both (Fig. 76.5). This mechanism is commonly associated with herniation of the orbital contents through the fractured orbital wall, hence the term blowout. The buckling mechanism, in contrast, occurs when a traumatic force is directed to the inferior orbital rim and causes only the inferior floor of the orbit to buckle, or fracture, with no associated herniation of the orbital contents.

Herniation of the orbital contents—fatty connective tissue, inferior rectus, and inferior oblique muscles—occurs at the weakest portions of the orbit, specifically, the orbital floor and the anteromedial wall. With increased pressure on the globe, any defect in these bony structures may lead to herniation of the orbital contents and resultant muscular entrapment.

Presenting Signs and Symptoms

Patients with a history of facial trauma should undergo complete evaluation of the eye and the encasing orbit. Initial inspection may reveal periorbital ecchymosis and edema, discrepancy in eye level, or enophthalmos. Enophthalmos is consistent with an orbital blowout fracture. Anesthesia of the ipsilateral cheek and upper lip is indicative of inferior orbital nerve impingement.

Key points in the patient’s history include the following:

The eye examination should begin with palpation of the orbital rims. The rims should be evaluated for crepitus, a step-off deformity, subcutaneous emphysema, and decreased sensation in the distribution of the inferior and superior orbital nerves.

Pupil size, shape, and light reflex must be examined to assess optic nerve status. Full ocular muscle function is evaluated by slow, directed passive range of motion. Upward gaze palsy with vertical diplopia is consistent with dysfunction of the inferior rectus muscle and suggests entrapment from an orbital blowout fracture. Enophthalmos is common when a large amount of tissue herniates through an orbital floor defect into the adjacent maxillary sinus.

The EP must evaluate both eyes for visual acuity. This examination may be facilitated by using a Snellen eye chart or pocket card or by asking the patient to read the text of a newspaper or other print. Visual impairment should prompt immediate consultation for the suspected injury. If the patient’s injury allows proper positioning and cooperation, a slit-lamp examination is warranted to fully evaluate the conjunctiva, lens, iris, sclera, cornea, and anterior chamber of the globe. Intraocular pressure can be measured. However, if the globe has possibly been ruptured, intraocular pressure assessment should be deferred to an ophthalmologist.

Treatment

Management of blowout fractures is complicated.21 The presence of an orbital fracture with findings of herniation on clinical or radiographic examination requires immediate surgical consultation to guide the treatment plan. Immediate indications for surgical intervention include muscular entrapment with gaze restriction or acute enophthalmos. Contraindications to surgery include globe rupture, hyphema, and retinal tears. These injuries should prompt emergency ophthalmologic consultation. An ophthalmologist should also be contacted for patients with evidence of lens dislocation, laceration of the cornea or sclera, or rapid loss of visual acuity.

Patients with an isolated blowout fracture may be discharged home with follow-up arranged within 2 weeks to assess for resolution of the swelling. If entrapment is present at follow-up, the patient would require open reduction of the fracture. Even patients with a blowout fracture may have their symptoms improve over a 10-day to 2-week period and may not require surgical intervention.

An increase in retrobulbar pressure from a hematoma or emphysema can lead to acute and permanent loss of vision. Lateral canthotomy can be a vision-saving intervention in this context. This simple procedure is intended to relieve pressure on the optic nerve and, ultimately, preserve the patient’s vision through resolution of the optic nerve traction and ischemia. Immediate ophthalmologic consultation should be obtained to perform the lateral canthotomy; when a consultant is unavailable or if a lengthy response time is anticipated, the procedure should be undertaken by the EP.

Local anesthetic without epinephrine is injected into the lateral canthus. An incision is made in the canthus with a pair of fine, sharp scissors. The incision is made in the canthus at the juncture of the upper and lower eyelids between the globe and the orbital rim. Expulsion and drainage of the hematoma should ensue through the incision site.

Zygoma Injury

Maxillary and Midface Injuries

Pathophysiology

Le Fort Classification

Maxillary fractures resulting from severe blows to the head have traditionally been classified according to the Le Fort classification scheme established by René Le Fort in 1901. Le Fort was a French surgeon who induced trauma in 35 cadaveric heads by striking them with a bat or smashing them against a table edge. Next, Le Fort boiled the heads to remove the soft tissue and documented the fracture lines. In his classic treatise on the subject, Le Fort illustrated three predictable midface fracture lines. These injuries rarely occur in isolation, but they are often used as a reference to describe maxillary trauma (Fig. 76.8).

Presenting Signs and Symptoms

Initial evaluation of a patient with a maxillary injury depends on its severity; findings include severe edema, malocclusion, periorbital ecchymosis, facial asymmetry, a long or “donkey” face, and enophthalmos. Palpation of the maxillary structures may reveal crepitus and abnormal mobility of the structures. Anesthesia over the cheek implies disruption of the inferior orbital nerve.

The EP should place one hand on the patient’s forehead to stabilize the head while grasping the upper palate by the anterior teeth with the other hand. Gentle back-and-forth pressure should be applied while palpating the midface for movement (Fig. 76.9). If motion of the midface structures is detected with this technique, further classification of the extent of the injury should be performed by localization of the nasal ridge or inferior orbital rims with the other hand. If CSF rhinorrhea is suspected, testing the fluid for glucose or the halo sign may be undertaken; however, both these assessments have a high false-positive rate and are considered unreliable. If a fracture is highly suspected or if CT is planned, manipulation of the midface offers little benefit and may cause increased bleeding.24

Treatment

Before a thorough evaluation of the maxilla is undertaken, the EP must first stabilize the patient and ensure that the airway is preserved. Airway compromise is more common with Le Fort II and III fractures but may also be seen with Le Fort I injuries.

Airway obstruction is often secondary to uncontrolled bleeding. Therefore, attempts at hemostasis should be undertaken early in the evaluation. Assessment of facial fracture bleeding should be completed during the “circulation” component of the ABCDE (airway, breathing, circulation, disability, exposure) evaluation technique advocated by the advanced trauma life support protocol. Early oral endotracheal intubation may be required and allows more aggressive control of bleeding.

Nasopharyngeal intubation should be avoided with midface injuries. A surgical airway (e.g., cricothyrotomy) may be necessary because of anatomic damage or excessive bleeding. Placement of an orogastric tube will allow assessment of swallowed blood, which can provide valuable information in a multitrauma patient with developing tachycardia, hypotension, or both.

If hemostasis of the nares cannot be achieved, a Foley catheter should be carefully advanced into the nasopharynx and inflated with air (overinflation may result in septal necrosis). The catheter should be gently pulled anteriorly in an attempt to close the posterior choana. Once the catheter is in place, the nasal cavity can be packed with gauze or nasal tampons for control of anterior epistaxis. The physician must be careful when advancing any tube through the nares because violation of the anterior cranial base can allow passage of the catheter into the cranium. If bleeding is not controlled with Foley catheters and packing, embolization of bleeding vessels with possible surgical exploration and ligation of vessels should occur. Emergency consultation with ear, nose, and throat (ENT), plastic surgery, and interventional radiology services should be considered early if the patient requires angiography. Regardless of the severity of bleeding, all patients with facial fractures should be reevaluated for hemorrhage every 30 minutes for a period of up to 6 hours.25

Nasal Injuries

Pathophysiology

Nasal bone fractures are commonly the result of sports-related trauma, assault, and motor vehicle crashes. The force required to fracture the nasal bone ranges from 16 to 66 kPa, the least of any facial bone.28 Simple deviated nasal fractures are the result of a lateral force against the nasal prominence. More complex nasoorbitoethmoid fractures are due to a stronger force directed toward the bridge of the nose with displacement of the bone segments posteriorly. This type of fracture is frequently associated with other facial and brain injuries.

Follow-up, Next Steps in Care, and Patient Education

Patients with known or suspected nasal fractures or septal displacement should be referred to an otolaryngologist or plastic surgeon within 1 week of their injury for reevaluation and planning of management. Patients may also be educated that if no deformity is apparent after the swelling has subsided, ENT follow-up is unnecessary. Children with nasal fractures should be seen in follow-up within 4 days because of rapid bone healing. Patients should be instructed to avoid blowing their nose given that subcutaneous emphysema may ensue as a result of displacement of air across the injured nasal structures.

Emergency consultation for consideration of nasal reduction is indicated if the nasal pyramid is deviated greater than half the width of the nasal bridge or if an open septal fracture has occurred. Open nasal fractures require immediate attention because cartilage necrosis may ensue if the exposed cartilage is not covered within 24 hours. Nasoorbitoethmoid fractures require a multidisciplinary approach, including oromaxillofacial, plastic, and neurosurgical consultation.

If a septal hematoma is identified, immediate evacuation is required. The nasal passage on the affected side is prepared via topical anesthesia and injection of lidocaine into the anterior septum. The hematoma is initially drained with a large-bore needle at the inferior aspect. The needle track is then enlarged with a No. 15 surgical blade. Next, the anterior nares are tightly packed bilaterally in an attempt to reappose the septal mucosa. Patients with septal hematoma should routinely be prescribed a course of antibiotics and otolaryngologic follow-up arranged within 4 days to assess the injury for evidence of reaccumulation of the hematoma. On discharge, patients need to be educated that any reaccumulation of septal hematoma will require emergency reevacuation. In addition, these patient need to be educated to avoid blowing their nose.

Lower Face Injuries

Pathophysiology

The location of mandibular fractures has some correlation to the insult received.30 High-velocity forces directed to the chin result in symphysis or condylar fractures (or both), and a high proportion of these injuries result in comminuted fractures. In contrast, assault-related injuries are more commonly associated with fractures of the angle and ramus. The location of trauma impact does not necessarily correlate with the location of the fracture site because the force of the impact can be transmitted to a distant area.

Dislocations of the mandible can be due to trauma, excessive mouth opening (yawning), seizure, or a dystonic reaction from medication. The mandible dislocates anteriorly and then superiorly, with spasm of the jaw muscles preventing realignment. Unilateral dislocation causes deviation of the mandible away from the affected side. Bilateral dislocation results in an open jaw and underbite appearance.

Presenting Signs and Symptoms

Typical initial symptoms of a mandibular injury include mandibular pain, abnormal jaw motion, malocclusion, and paresthesia of the ipsilateral lower lip secondary to disruption of the mandibular nerve. Patients often state that their “bite is off,” a sign of displacement or malocclusion of the mandible or maxilla. If the patient reports pain in the preauricular area, fracture of the condyle is frequently present.

Examination of the mandible should begin with visual inspection for edema, deviation with passive range of motion, and a “widened face,” an indication of a bilateral condylar fracture. The EP should palpate the outside of the face to ensure preservation of the smooth contour of the mandible. During the intraoral examination, clues to a mandibular fracture include ecchymosis of the floor of the mouth and mucosal tears. Any obvious separation of the lower teeth or step deformity is pathognomonic for fracture.

The EP inspects the temporomandibular joint by first performing an otoscopic examination for signs of perforation of the external ear canal or hemotympanum. A Battle sign is indicative of perforation of the glenoid fossa by a fractured condyle. Next, the examiner’s fingers are placed in the external canal, and the patient is instructed to open and close the mouth. Tenderness or crepitus elicited with this examination is indicative of a condylar fracture.

If the clinical findings are misleading, one can perform the tongue blade test, which has been demonstrated by Alonso and Purcell to have high sensitivity in screening for mandibular fractures.31 The test is performed by placing a wooden tongue blade between the molars (Fig. 76.12). The patient is instructed to bite down, and the examiner exerts a twisting motion in an effort to crack the wooden blade between the patient’s teeth. If the EP is unable to crack the blade between the patient’s teeth during the twisting motion—because of pain or malocclusion—a positive test is confirmed with subsequent enhanced suspicion for a mandibular fracture.

Treatment

Initial management of a mandibular fracture should ensure that the patient can maintain a patent airway without difficulty. Pain relief may then be obtained with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and narcotic agents. Because of the potential for wound infection from mouth flora, patients with open mandibular fractures should be treated with oral or intravenous penicillin. Clindamycin is an excellent choice for penicillin-allergic patients. Stabilization of a displaced mandibular fracture can be achieved with a Barton bandage.

When traumatic temporomandibular joint dislocation is encountered, the EP must obtain a dental panoramic study to consider the presence of a concomitant condylar fracture. If no indication of fracture is present, an attempt at reduction of the mandible in the ED may be undertaken with provision of intravenous benzodiazepines, as well as occasional procedural sedation and analgesia, to relax the muscles of mastication.

To perform reduction, the EP’s thumbs are wrapped in gauze (to prevent injury). The EP faces the patient and places the thumbs on the posterior molars of the patient’s mandible; the remaining fingers are wrapped around the inferior border of the mandible. Force is directed down on the thumbs as the symphyseal area is raised toward the EP. If reduction is unsuccessful, the patient may require general anesthesia. After reduction of an acute dislocation, the patient should be placed on a soft diet and instructed not to open the mouth wide for 7 days.

Follow-up, next Steps in Care, and Patient Education

Any patient with an open or unstable mandibular fracture requires admission for occlusion fixation or mandibular wiring. Patients with stable fractures may be discharged home and instructed to maintain a soft diet, and prompt outpatient follow-up should be arranged with an otolaryngologist or oral surgeon. Edentulous patients usually require admission to the hospital and internal fixation because they do not have teeth to assist in stabilizing the fracture. Phone consultation with an oromaxillofacial or plastic surgeon is essential to formulate an appropriate treatment plan.

image Priority Actions

Suspicious mechanism of injury? Is the patient being physically abused? Unwitnessed head, neck, and facial injuries, particularly in women, should raise concern for interpersonal violence.

Typical concomitant injuries in a patient with facial trauma include contusions, intracranial pathology, and abdominal and cervical spine injuries.

Is the patient experiencing sudden loss of vision or eye pain? Increased retrobulbar pressure from a hematoma or emphysema can lead to acute and permanent loss of vision.

Pain with eye movement? Does the patient have muscle entrapment?

Loss of sensation in the nerve distribution?

Does the patient have malocclusion? Consider a mandibular or maxillary fracture.

Lacerations through the vermilion border require extra attention to detail with surgical closure. Slight misalignment at the time of wound closure may result in substantial cosmetic implications.

Competency of the parotid duct must be considered with all deep cheek lacerations.

Do not attempt to realign a fractured nose in the emergency department.

Does the patient have a septal hematoma?

Does the patient have an otohematoma?

Is the patient’s tetanus immunization up to date?

References

1 Bisson JI, Shepherd JP, Dhutia M. Psychological sequelae of facial trauma. J Trauma. 1997;43:496–500.

2 Wu V, Huff H, Bhandari M. Pattern of physical injury associated with intimate partner violence in women presenting to the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2010;11:71–82.

3 Shepherd SM, Lippe MS. Maxillofacial trauma: evaluation and management by the emergency physician. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1987;5:371–392.

4 Alvi A, Doherty T, Lewen G. Facial fractures and concomitant injuries in trauma patients. Laryngoscope. 2003;113:102–106.

5 Kraus JF, Rice TM, Peek-Asa C, et al. Facial trauma and the risk of intracranial injury in motorcycle riders. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41:18–26.

6 Nakhgevany KB, LiBassi M, Esposito B. Facial trauma in motor vehicle accidents: etiologic factors. Am J Emerg Med. 1994;12:160–163.

7 Plaisier BR, Punjabi AP, Super DM, et al. The relationship between facial fractures and death from neurologic injury. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58:708–712.

8 Parry M. Maxillofacial trauma—developments, innovations, and controversies. Injury. 2009;40:1252–1259.

9 Hallock GG. Microsurgical repair of the parotid duct. Microsurgery. 1992;13:243–246.

10 Kerwin AJ, Bynoe RP, Murray AJ, et al. Liberalized screening for blunt carotid and vertebral artery injuries is justified. J Trauma. 2001;51:308–314.

11 Ardekian L, Rosen D, Klein Y, et al. Life-threatening complications and irreversible damage following maxillofacial trauma. Injury. 1998;29:253–256.

12 Howes DS, Dowling PJ. Oral facial emergencies: triage and initial evaluation of the oral facial emergency. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2000;18:371–378.

13 Hackl W, Fink C, Hausberger K, et al. The incidence of combined facial and cervical spine injuries. J Trauma. 2001;50:41–45.

14 Bynoe RP, Kerwin AJ, Parker HH, 3rd., et al. Maxillofacial injuries and life-threatening hemorrhage: treatment with transcatheter arterial embolization. J Trauma. 2003;55:74–79.

15 Dean NR, Ledgard JP, Katsaros J. Massive hemorrhage in facial fracture patients: definition, incidence, and management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:680–690.

16 Lauder A, Jalisi S, Speigel J, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in the management of complex midface and frontal sinus trauma. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:1940–1945.

17 Joondeph BC. Blunt ocular trauma. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1988;6:147–167.

18 Larian B, Wong B, Crumley RL, et al. Facial trauma and ocular/orbital injury. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma. 1999;5:15–24.

19 Wang BH, Robertson BC, Girotto JA, et al. Traumatic optic neuropathy: a review of 61 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1655–1664.

20 Waterhouse N, Lyne J, Urdang M, et al. An investigation into the mechanism of orbital blowout fractures. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52:607–612.

21 Mathog RH. Management of orbital blowout fractures. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1991;24:79–91.

22 Zingg M, Laedrach K. Classification and treatment of zygomatic fractures: a review of 1025 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:778–790.

23 Iqbal HA, Chaudhry S. Choice of operative method for management of isolated zygomatic bone fractures; evidence based study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009;59:615–618.

24 Bagheri SC, Holmgren E, Katemani D, et al. Comparison of the severity of bilateral Le Fort injuries in isolated midface trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:1123–1129.

25 Greene D, Raven R, Carvalho G, et al. Epidemiology of facial injury in blunt assault. Determinants of incidence and outcome in 802 patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:923–928.

26 Villalobos T, Arango C, Kubilis P, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis after basilar skull fractures: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27:364–369.

27 Abubaker AO. Use of prophylactic antibiotics in preventing infection of traumatic injuries. Dent Clin North Am. 2009;53:707–715.

28 Holt GR. Biomechanics of nasal septal trauma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1999;32:615–619.

29 Mondin V, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. Management of nasal bone fractures. Am J Otolaryngol. 2005;26:181–185.

30 Tessier P. The classic reprint: experimental study of fractures of the upper jaw. 3. René Le Fort, M.D., Lille, France. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1972;50:600–607.

31 Alonso LL, Purcell TB. Accuracy of the tongue blade test in patients with suspected mandibular fracture. J Emerg Med. 1995;13:297–304.