Extracranial Vertebral Artery Diseases

Published on 13/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurosurgery

Last modified 13/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 4397 times

CHAPTER 354 Extracranial Vertebral Artery Diseases

Historical Background

As early as 1844, Quain1 described the anatomy and operative surgery of the extracranial vertebral artery in lithographic drawings. Subsequently, in 1853, Maisonneuve successfully ligated the vertebral artery at the transverse foramen of the sixth cervical vertebra for a stab wound to the neck.2 Elective ligation of the vertebral artery was also used to treat aneurysms. In 1888, Matas2 was the first surgeon who fully excised an aneurysm between the occiput and the atlas through a posterior approach. Forty years later, Moniz3 performed the first vertebral angiogram in 1927. Radner4 first reported selective angiography of the vertebral artery in 1947. The role of pathology of the extracranial vessels in relation to cerebral ischemia was emerging,5 and with this revolution in the diagnosis of diseased arteries, revascularization was being performed. In 1958, Crawford and coworkers6 presented their results of surgical treatment of brainstem ischemia by reconstructing the vertebral artery after removing atherosclerotic plaque. The next year, Cate and Scott7 first described the technique of transsubclavian endarterectomy of the subclavian-vertebral artery.

Angiography allowed visualization of other causes of extracranial vertebral artery disease, including extrinsic compression of the vertebral artery by osteophytes,8 constricting bands,9 and rotational obstruction,10 all of which were diagnosed and treated by surgical decompression. Angiography also provided the first extensive cooperative study of the incidence of extracranial arterial stenosis caused by atherosclerotic lesions in patients with cerebrovascular insufficiency. In 1968, stenosis was proposed to be a compromised lumen of more than 50% by the Joint Study of Extracranial Arterial Occlusion.11 Of 4748 patients with cerebral ischemic symptoms, 80% had four-vessel angiograms that were categorized by location of the arterial stenosis. For the first time, this study provided a frequency distribution of sites of stenosis in the extracranial vertebral artery,11 identifying at least some degree of stenosis in 22% and 18% of left and right proximal vertebral arteries, respectively, and 5% to 6% of the distal extracranial vertebral.

Today, posterior circulation stroke still accounts for 30% to 40% of all ischemic strokes, a subset of which is secondary to isolated extracranial vertebral artery disease. Treatment options have evolved to include endovascular options, although surgical intervention remains a valid option for extracranial vertebral artery revascularization in many instances.

Clinical Presentation

The external vertebral arteries provide blood flow to a large distribution through the basilar artery and posterior cerebral arteries. Therefore, symptoms can arise from the occipital or temporal lobes, cerebellum, pons, and brainstem with its cranial nerves, a syndrome referred to as vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI) and characterized by intermittent episodes of multiple symptoms that can be sudden or severe (Table 354-1). Eventually, the symptoms either resolve or become permanent. These symptoms are caused not only by embolic or thrombotic sources but also by hemodynamic mechanisms. Changes in the blood flow of the vertebral artery can account for symptoms of VBI,12 even those created in some instances by head turning.13

TABLE 354-1 Symptoms of Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency

The presence of at least two of these symptoms is required to diagnose vertebrobasilar insufficiency:

In a review of the literature, Ausman and coworkers14 concluded that the symptoms of VBI have multiple causes and that one can seldom localize pathologic lesions in the posterior circulation by clinical examination alone. Most physicians use the presence of any two of the common symptoms to define the syndrome. The most common symptom that physicians have difficulty relating to VBI is vertigo or dizziness, which is often associated with other diseases; many articles have ruled out the occurrence of isolated vertigo or dizziness as evidence of transient ischemic attack (TIA). In general, vertigo or dizziness alone is not considered a presenting symptom of VBI,15 although some authors still assert that these could be exclusive symptoms of VBI.16,17

Anatomy of the Extracranial Vertebral Artery

The vertebral artery varies in diameter from 0.5 to 5.5 mm. The left vertebral artery is larger than the right in about 75% of cases.18 The vertebral artery flow in normal volunteers, as measured by quantitative magnetic resonance angiography (QMRA), ranges from 7 to 199 mL per minute (mean, 90 ± 32 mL per minute; median, 88 mL per minute) on the right, and 21 to 245 mL per minute (mean, 99 ± 40 mL per minute; median, 100 mL per minute) on the left.19

The extracranial vertebral arteries can be divided into three segments—the first (V1), second (V2) and third (V3), which can alternatively be termed the proximal, middle (intraosseous), and distal segments (Fig. 354-1). The designation is helpful because the associated pathology can differ among the segments.

Pathophysiology of Extracranial Vertebral Artery Disease

The pathophysiology of extracranial vertebral artery disease is not as well understood as that of the carotid system. Vertebrobasilar symptoms arise from interruption of the blood supply to the brain and brainstem. The interruption can be the result of hypoperfusion caused by hemodynamic changes or by thromboembolic sources.

Regional hypoperfusion is the predominant stroke mechanism for patients with posterior circulation ischemia. Large or small vessel occlusive disease occurs more commonly in the posterior circulation than thromboembolism.21,22 Stroke secondary to vertebral stenosis can be hemodynamic in the setting of anatomic variations in the other artery, such as a hypoplastic vertebral artery, termination of one artery into the posterior inferior cerebellar artery, or complete occlusion of the contralateral vertebral.20 There also may be associated pathology in the carotid system or an incomplete circle of Willis,18 which affects the collateral circulation. Hemodynamic changes can also result systemically from cardiac insufficiency or postural hypotension.

The pathology that causes hemodynamic changes and the sources of emboli often overlap. Emboli or thrombi may originate from vertebral arteries, subclavian artery, aortic arches, pathologic heart valves, abnormal cardiac wall behavior, or arrhythmias. Atherosclerotic plaque is usually the source of emboli or thrombi from the aorta or subclavian or vertebral arteries. Embolism arising from within or outside the vertebral system seeks the terminal branches of the basilar artery or the posterior cerebral arteries. Consequently, symptoms can manifest as simple cranial nerve palsies or brainstem vascular syndromes (e.g., Wallenberg’s syndrome, Weber’s syndrome). Acute visual field defects or symptoms of occipital lobe infarction can also be presenting symptoms.

The underlying etiology of extracranial vertebral disease can be separated into three primary diseases from which both mechanisms, hypoperfusion and emboli, can play a role in symptoms: atherosclerosis, dissection, and extrinsic compression. Additionally, subclavian steal syndrome is a distinct entity that leads to hemodynamic impairment of the vertebral artery.

Atherosclerosis

Atherosclerosis is the most common form of vertebral artery disease. Although it is a potential source of thromboembolic plaque, it can cause significant hypoperfusion by obstructing blood flow. One of the most extensive studies on the incidence of extracranial disease in symptomatic patients was presented by Hass and associates11 from the Joint Study of Extracranial Arterial Occlusion. They found that the most common site of plaque formation in the vertebrobasilar arterial system was the origin of the proximal vertebral artery (right vertebral artery, 18.4%; left vertebral artery, 22.3%). The second most common site was the middle vertebral artery. In this region, it is believed that the blood flow is dampened as it passes through the transverse foramina. Atherosclerosis occurs less frequently intracranially, in the mid basilar artery, and at the entry of the vertebral artery through the dura.

The natural history of extracranial vertebral artery atherosclerotic disease is not well known. Moufarrij and associates reviewed 96 patients with vertebral disease, 89 (93%) of whom had proximal extracranial disease at the vertebral origin.23 Most (75%) of these patients were asymptomatic in relation to their vertebral disease at presentation. Over an average of 4.6 years of follow-up, 19.8% experienced probable VBI symptoms, and another 2% suffered brainstem infarction. Recurrent stroke risks in patients with symptomatic extracranial vertebral atherosclerosis have not been well defined, although estimates of stroke risk in patients with symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar disease are 10% to 15% per year.24

Dissection

Spontaneous

The annual incidence of vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is about 1 to 1.5 per 100,25 and VAD is bilateral in 22% of cases.26 Spontaneous VAD is the term used to describe vertebral dissections that do not involve blunt or penetrating trauma as a precipitating factor. However, a history of trivial or minor injury is elicited frequently from patients with so-called spontaneous VAD. The diagnosis of traumatic VAD is reserved for patients with a history of significant trauma, including motor vehicle crashes, falls, or penetrating injuries. Spontaneous dissections are associated with systemic diseases affecting the arterial walls. In both the carotid and vertebral arteries, fibromuscular dysplasia is the most common associated condition in spontaneous dissection. It tends to affect areas where there is significant movement of the cervical spine and therefore occurs in the middle and distal segments of the vertebral artery. The formation of pseudoaneurysms is also quite common, although these lesions are often asymptomatic.18 Other risk factors include spinal manipulation, ceiling painting, nose blowing, oral contraceptive use, hypertension, cystic medial necrosis, migraine headaches, female sex, and recent infection.25 Extracranial vertebral artery dissection is characterized by headache (often occipital) or neck pain and signs of ischemia in the posterior circulation.26,27 Infarcts in the territory of the posterior-inferior cerebral artery (commonly with a lateral medullary syndrome) are seen in 13% of vertebral dissections.28 Intracranial vertebrobasilar dissection may present with symptoms of posterior circulation ischemia (particularly brainstem), subarachnoid hemorrhage (occurs in half of patients), or both.

Subclavian Steal Syndrome

Subclavian steal syndrome was first described by Reivich and colleagues36 in 1961 when they discovered reversed flow in the vertebral artery. It is a disease not affecting the extracranial vertebral artery directly but leading to symptoms of VBI due to hemodynamic alterations in the vertebrobasilar system. It is caused by stenosis or occlusion in the subclavian or innominate artery proximal to the vertebral artery. If the pressure in the subclavian artery distal to the obstruction is low enough, it acts as a “sink” for the flow of blood from the vertebral artery and drains blood from the contralateral vertebral artery and even as far as the circle of Willis (Fig. 354-2). Hence, patients can experience VBI. Most of these symptoms are caused by use of the extremities when the demand for blood flow is increased and the pressure sink becomes more pronounced. In many cases, patients rarely experience symptoms at rest. The symptoms can be provoked by an arm challenge test. This has been further evaluated recently with flow measurements using QMRA before and after the arm challenge test,37 in which a basilar flow index (basilar artery flow to total intracranial flow) was calculated during the challenge test and compared with the baseline. A low basilar flow index correlated with VBI symptoms from steal.

Diagnostic Evaluation

The symptoms associated with disease of the extracranial vertebral artery are multiple and often vague. Distinguishing patients with true VBI is therefore a significant challenge. Many systemic and neurological diseases can cause VBI-type symptoms: Ménière’s disease, infection or dysfunction of the vestibular and labyrinthine structures, demyelinating diseases, seizures, tumors of the cerebellopontine angle, spinal column dysfunction, and compression of structures in the posterior fossa from either masses (intra-axial cerebellum tumors) or bony encroachment (Chiari’s malformation). Reduced cardiac output can also cause symptoms of VBI. Cardiac disease such as dysrhythmias, cardiac insufficiency, and infarction can result in poor cardiac output. Thromboembolic causes from cardiac valvular disease, bacterial endocarditis, dysrhythmias, and hematologic diseases (thrombocytosis, bleeding disorders, sickle cell) can cause symptoms of VBI. Therefore, a careful medical and diagnostic work-up is necessary when evaluating these patients.

Hemodynamic Evaluation

After an obstructive lesion has been identified, it is important to determine whether the VBI symptoms are from poor perfusion caused by the obstruction or by emboli. Cerebral angiography can give some sense of the cause, but it is far from reliable. Several methods have been used to evaluate the hemodynamics. Ultrasonography of the vertebral arteries has been used, but insonation is difficult, and its sensitivity is questionable. Variability in equipment, institutions, and technicians makes this method unsatisfactory.41 Intracranial hemodynamic changes have also been monitored with transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, but this technique is difficult to use in the posterior fossa. Imaging techniques used to assess tissue level perfusion, such as positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and xenon CT are of limited use in the posterior fossa because of imaging difficulties related to skull base artifacts and imaging resolution.

Since the 1980s, flow quantification using phase-contrast QMRA of the blood vessels has been studied.4244 Although static MRI or conventional angiography is useful for determining the anatomy of the vessel, QMRA provides actual flow rates of blood in the vessel (in milliliters per minute). Both in vitro and in vivo flow studies have shown that velocities and volumetric flow rates can be estimated accurately for the carotid, vertebral, and major cerebral arteries. Normal values for flow rates in these vessels have been estimated.19 QMRA provides a noninvasive method for analyzing patients with VBI. Patients with VBI in the setting of steno-occlusive vertebrobasilar disease stratified by QMRA to have a normal flow in their distal intracranial vasculature had a recurrent stroke–free survival rate of 100% at 2 years, compared with those with low distal flow, who had a 71% stroke-free survival rate.45 Based on knowledge of the normal range of flow rates in these vessels, it can be determined whether obstructive lesions are significant enough to cause hypoperfusion of the vertebral artery. This knowledge may be helpful in selecting candidates for surgical or endovascular treatment.

Medical Management

Atherosclerotic Disease

Antiplatelet Therapy

Several antiplatelet trials have shown that aspirin reduces the relative risks for stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death by about 25%.46 Ticlopidine is more effective than aspirin but has important side effects. Clopidogrel is as effective as ticlopidine, with fewer side effects. In 1996, the European Stroke Prevention Study showed that dipyridamole effectively prevents stroke and, when combined with aspirin, is equivalent to ticlopidine or clopidogrel.47 These results can be applied to the medical treatment of extracranial vertebral artery disease. Recently, the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Committee published their recommendation for the prevention of stroke in patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or TIA.48 They concluded that aspirin monotherapy, clopidogrel monotherapy, and aspirin combined with extended-release dipyridamole all remain accepted options for initial therapy in patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke and TIA.

Two studies have reported outcomes from medical therapy for extracranial vertebral artery disease. Millikan and colleagues49 showed a decline in the mortality rate from 43% to 14% when heparin was used systemically to treat extracranial vertebral artery disease. Twenty years later in a 4-year follow-up, Whisnant and coworkers50 reported that the incidence of brainstem stroke decreased from 35% to 15% when oral anticoagulants were used. In neither study were the patients chosen randomly, nor did most of the patients undergo angiography. Meanwhile, outcome studies on the use of aspirin compared with warfarin for intracranial symptomatic atherosclerosis24 in the posterior circulation disease failed to show any benefit of warfarin over aspirin. The findings can be extrapolated with caution to the extracranial vertebral arteries.

Statin Therapy

The use of 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme-A reductase inhibitors (statins) has been evaluated for the prevention of ischemic stroke. The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial51 demonstrated an 18% relative reduction in the risk for recurrent stroke in patients randomized to atorvastatin 80 mg per day versus placebo. Based on this clinical trial, the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Committee recommended statin therapy with intensive lipid-lowering effects for patients with atherosclerotic ischemic stroke or TIA even without known coronary artery disease to reduce the risk for stroke and cardiovascular disease.48 Furthermore, recent data indicate that high-intensity statin therapy might regress plaque burden over time in patients with coronary disease.52 No such studies have looked specifically at extracranial vertebral artery disease.

Dissection

Current options include anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, surgical treatment, and endovascular treatment. Patients with symptoms of cerebral ischemia generally should be admitted to a monitored bed with supportive stroke care (e.g., intravenous fluids, prevention of hyperglycemia). No randomized controlled trials have been performed to determine optimal treatment. In patients with hemodynamically significant dissections, hypertensive or hypervolemic therapy may be initiated.

Anticoagulation Therapy

The treatment of vertebral artery dissection is based on rather incomplete evidence. Anticoagulation with heparin followed by oral anticoagulation therapy remains popular in most centers and is supported by demonstration of emboli as the most common cause of stroke in these patients.53 Anticoagulation with a target international normalized ratio between 2 and 3 is generally recommended for 3 to 6 months. This practice is supported by several small case series demonstrating good outcome with low complication rates in patients receiving anticoagulation.54,55 After 3 months, a follow-up angiogram or MRI is recommended. If the pathology persists, oral anticoagulation is continued for another 3 months. If reevaluation after 3 months (6 months after dissection) shows persistence of the pathology, oral anticoagulation is stopped, and the patient is kept on antiplatelet therapy for life. The rationales behind this approach are the high recanalization rate within the first 2 to 3 months after the dissection and the observation that, after discontinuation of anticoagulation, recurrence of symptoms occasionally may occur between 3 and 6 months after the onset of dissection but rarely after 6 months. Oral anticoagulation is contraindicated in intracranial dissections complicated by subarachnoid hemorrhage and in presence of a large infarct with associated mass effect or intracranial extension of the dissection.54 Antiplatelet therapy is an alternative to anticoagualtion53,54; however, there are no clinical trials available to determine whether antiplatelet therapy is equal or superior to anticoagulation owing to the low rate of recurrent ischemic events in patients with dissection. Furthermore, in a meta-analysis of 26 studies including 327 patients, Lyrer and Engelter found no significant difference between the two treatment options in the odds of death and in the odds of being alive but disabled.56

Thrombolysis

The role of thrombolysis in patients with acute infarction secondary to dissection has been explored.57,58 Thrombolysis treatment (intravenous and intra-arterial) has been successful in some patients with arterial occlusion caused by dissection if performed within several hours of onset.59,60 The thrombolytic agent acts on clots in both the true lumen and the false lumen of the dissecting vessel, resulting in reduced stenosis. However, in cases with associated subarachnoid hemorrhage, thrombolytic therapy has the potential to aggravate the risk for subarachnoid hemorrhage and should be avoided.61,62

Compression

Buy Membership for Neurosurgery Category to continue reading. Learn more here