Exercise as therapy

Published on 16/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1285 times

chapter 9 Exercise as therapy

WHY IS EXERCISE ESSENTIAL FOR HEALTH?

The renowned exercise biologist, Professor Frank Booth, described in great detail the importance of exercise for maintaining normal function and health, in his extensive review of the research literature.1 The basic tenet is that the human genome has not changed appreciably in the past 45,000 years and developed in an environment of high levels of physical activity. While our lifestyles have become predominantly sedentary in our working and leisure environments, our underlying biology expects stimuli involving physical work for extended periods, possibly dawn until dusk, as well as high-force and high-power activities such as would have been required to carry water, children, food, construction materials and tools as well as to run after animals that we sought to kill, or run away from animals desiring to eat us.

Contemporary humans are flying in the face of our genome, which dictates every biochemical process in our bodies. The result is progressive disease and disability from early adulthood, or even earlier in the case of sedentary and often overweight children. Our physical health, apart from injury or infection, is dictated by four interacting factors: genetic predisposition, physical activity, nutritional intake, and environmental factors such as toxins and sun exposure.

Chronic disease is now being described as an epidemic currently accounting for some 70% of our total health burden. This is being driven principally by the three most significant risk factors for chronic disease: tobacco use, inappropriate nutrition and physical inactivity.

EXERCISE TRENDS IN AUSTRALIA AND ELSEWHERE

Despite the strong research evidence indicating that regular physical exercise is essential for human health, rates of sedentary and low exercise levels in Australia remain very high, at around 70% of the population over 15 years of age.2 This has not changed appreciably in the past 10 years despite the best efforts of government and organisations such as the Cancer Council and Heart Foundation to address this societal problem. The rate of no or low physical exercise is higher in females (73%) than in males (66%), and higher in the oldest age group of 75 years and over, at 83%. The rate is lowest in people aged 15–24 years but still frighteningly high at 62%.

The 2007 Australian National Children’s Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey is one of the most extensive investigations of exercise patterns in children aged 2–16 years conducted to date, with some 4487 participants. It was encouraging that most children aged 9–16 years met the Department of Health and Ageing recommendation that children aged 5–18 years accumulate at least 60 minutes, and up to several hours, of moderate to vigorous physical activity every day. According to the survey, there was a 69% chance that any given child would achieve this recommendation. With regard to gender, girls met the guidelines less frequently than boys, both boys and girls were less likely to meet the requirement as they got older, and this drop-off was much higher in older girls.3

Internationally the data are similar for the developed nations; however, physical inactivity levels appear to be increasing markedly in developing countries with modernisation. One trend that is clear throughout the world is the increasing use of screen-based technologies such as television, computers and mobile phones, which appears to have the direct effect of reducing physical activity.

GENERAL HEALTH, QUALITY OF LIFE AND LONGEVITY

The application of exercise for prevention and management of some specific health problems will be described later in this chapter. To establish the importance of exercise for general health, quality and quantity of life, the overall effects of exercise are summarised in Table 9.1.

TABLE 9.1 Effects of regular exercise on health

Health parameter Effect of regular exercise Preferred exercise mode
Hypertension Reduction of systolic and diastolic blood pressure Aerobic predominantly but some research indicates anabolic also effective
Cardiac function Increased stroke volume and maximum cardiac output Aerobic exercise
Cardiorespiratory fitness Increased efficiency and maximum capacity Aerobic exercise
Haemoglobin Increased Aerobic exercise
Cholesterol Reduces LDL, elevates HDL, lowers total cholesterol and triglycerides Aerobic exercise
Glucose metabolism Glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity improved Aerobic and anabolic exercise
Bone density Increased bone mineral density, bone mineral content, cortical thickness and fracture threshold Anabolic and ground-based impact exercises (e.g. skipping, bounding, jumping)
Body fat Reduced percentage body fat Aerobic and anabolic combined
Muscle mass Increased muscle cross-sectional area, increased fibre size Anabolic exercise
Strength Increased Anabolic exercise
Physical functioning Gait speed, stair climb, sit to stand, balance, falls risk all improved Anabolic and aerobic exercise
Quality of life Improvement in both general and disease-specific QOL measures Anabolic and aerobic exercise

HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; QOL: quality of life.

With such beneficial effects one would expect active people to live longer and better-quality lives, and this is certainly borne out in the research.

TYPES OF EXERCISE

AEROBIC EXERCISE

Cardiorespiratory capacity or fitness relates to the ability to perform large-muscle-group, dynamic, moderate-to-high intensity exercise such as walking or cycling for prolonged periods.4 Exercise prescription for cardiovascular fitness is based on mode, intensity, duration and frequency of the activity. The activities prescribed most frequently are walking, cycling, jogging, running, rowing, swimming and hiking. It is suggested that individuals should choose activities that they enjoy and are enthusiastic about continuing, as this will increase program compliance.

ANABOLIC EXERCISE

The other major form of exercise critical to long-term health is anabolic exercise, which is also termed ‘resistance training’ or ‘weightlifting’. This form of exercise involves performing movements against resistance such as barbells, dumbbells, resistance machines or elastic resistance, such that the number of repetitions that can be completed is limited to 12 or less. This is a very important stipulation of intensity. If the movement can be completed more than 10–12 times then the resistance is too light and must be increased. Without such resistance the positive anabolic effects on muscle and bone will not be realised and the hormonal changes that are so neuro-protective will not result.

This concept may seem a little ‘out there’ for people who have not exercised previously or even lifted weights before but the research evidence in support of regular anabolic exercise is huge, demonstrating marked improvements in muscle mass, bone strength, functional capacity and positive effects on mental health and cognitive function. The recommendation of the American College of Sports Medicine is for people aged over 65 years to complete resistance training two to three times per week. The precise prescription is presented in Boxes 9.1 and 9.2.

For healthy adults over age 65 or adults aged 50–64 with chronic conditions, the physical activity guidelines in Box 9.1 are recommended.

ACCUMULATION OF EXERCISE IS THE KEY

One of the most common excuses people provide for their low level of physical activity is that they simply do not have the time. As can be seen in Boxes 9.1 and 9.2, the total commitment required is only 150 minutes of aerobic exercise per week and 90 minutes of strength training. This is less than 4% of a person’s total waking minutes per week. The key is to be flexible in how this is scheduled. Exercise can be undertaken at any time of day or night, and organised into any preferred blocks of effort, with little decrement in health benefit. So whether the patient completes a single bout of 30 minutes of aerobic exercise in a given day or three blocks of 10 minutes, the effect is essentially the same.

GETTING STARTED

The first step on any great journey is often the hardest, and initiating an exercise program can also be daunting. If a person has never been involved in an ongoing exercise program, how to begin, what to expect, whether one is overdoing it or not working hard enough, are all questions the new exerciser faces. For many of us the experience of our bodies responding to exercise with increased heart rate, increased breathing, body temperature rising, muscles aching and the discomfort that can accompany exercise, is foreign and unsettling. For the vast majority these experiences are not harbingers of illness or death. They are the normal adjustments that the body makes automatically to help us perform exercise. Of course if the discomfort is excessive then this is a warning sign, and the person experiencing it should consult their doctor or exercise specialist. Habitual exercisers come to enjoy these changes in their physiology—the sweat, heat and exertion—because they are often associated with positive changes in the brain chemistry and a feeling of exhilaration and success.

If the patient is over 35 years of age or has any primary risk factors for cardiovascular disease such as a family history of heart attack or stroke, high blood pressure, high cholesterol or existing cardiovascular disease, or is overweight, then it is important that they consult their doctor before starting an exercise program.

To begin, it is a good idea to consider seeking expert advice or joining a supervised exercise program. Some insurers provide limited cover for visits to many of these professionals and programs. General practitioners can provide referral to an exercise physiologist as these are the recognised allied health professional for the prescription and monitoring of exercise programs, particularly for people with existing chronic disease.

No matter which option the patients selects, if it has been a while since they have been active it is important to start slowly. Find a routine that suits them. If the person enjoys the activity they are much more likely to stick with it. Whenever possible they should exercise with a friend or relative. Many people find the social aspects of exercise the most enjoyable, and having someone else along also increases safety.

COMPONENTS OF AN EXERCISE SESSION

Warm-up

Warm-up facilitates the transition from rest to exercise; it may reduce susceptibility to musculoskeletal injury by improving joint range of motion, and reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events.4 Regardless of training mode, exercise sessions should start with 5–10 minutes of low-intensity exercise incorporating stretching exercises and/or progressive lower-intensity aerobic activity. For example, participants who use 20 kg in a chest press exercise for 12 repetitions might have a warm-up set using 5–10 kg for 15 repetitions before initiating this particular exercise. Similarly, participants who use brisk walking or jogging might conduct a warm-up phase using a slow walk before initiating the training program. Implementing a gradual transition from rest to intense exercise is critical in reducing the risk of an adverse event, such as muscle strain or even a cardiovascular event. The body is much more comfortable with gradual changes in exercise intensity.

Specific phase

Cardiorespiratory training includes 20–60 minutes of continuous or intermittent (minimum of 10-minute bouts accumulated during the day) of aerobic activity training at 60–90% maximum heart rate (MHR) or 50–85% MHR reserve.7 Anabolic resistance exercises include performing 1–4 sets per muscle group training at 50–80% of 1 RM (repetition maximum) or 6–12 RM.7 Flexibility or range-of-motion training includes performing 2–4 sets per muscle group at 30–60 seconds stretching time.7

BASIC PRINCIPLES OF EXERCISE

The aim of this section is to provide knowledge of the basic principles of exercise and in particular aerobic and anabolic exercise. Exercise programs may be implemented in a range of settings and may not always have personnel with qualifications and experience in exercise physiology. The following discussion provides a very basic level of knowledge necessary to understand the principles underlying the exercise programs presented in the later sections of this chapter.

EXERCISE PROGRAM VARIABLES

Adaptation

If a lift in a building were required to lift its maximum capacity from the ground floor to the rooftop each day, it would not increase in its performance and be able to carry more people. It would be more likely to deteriorate—its bearings would wear, the electric motor would become less efficient and performance overall would decline. The human body is a very different machine because it has the ability to respond to a stimulus, such as the work of running or the stress of lifting weights, by altering its structure and function in order to better perform that activity in future. This is termed ‘adaptation’ and is the basis of physical training. A number of points about adaptation must be considered.

First, the body must have a biological mechanism enabling it to make the adaptation. For example, shortening the length of the bones of the upper arm and forearm would greatly increase the amount of weight that could be lifted in the bench press due to increased mechanical advantage, but the body is not capable of this process. Increasing the size of the muscles that perform the bench press would also allow the body to lift more weight and this is certainly an adaptation that is within our capabilities.

Second, the adaptation is very specific to the stimuli—resistance training tends to produce an increase in muscle size, whereas swimming produces an increase in the heart’s ability to pump blood. The concept of specificity will be discussed in more detail later in this chapter.

Repetitions, sets, rest and sessions

Many program variables can be manipulated to provide various forms of overload and, thus, specific training adaptations. To understand the training program design and goals it is important for us to define and understand these program variables.

The basic unit of a resistance training session is the repetition. For a given training movement, a repetition is the completion of one complete cycle from the starting position, through the end of the movement and back to the start. When strength training, a series of repetitions is normally completed and this is termed a ‘set’. During the set, the neuromuscular system will fatigue, and performing the exercise will become more difficult. At the completion of the required number of repetitions or when the person is no longer able to complete any more repetitions, the set is completed. The person then waits until the neuromuscular system recovers and then completes further sets of exercise. The period between sets is called ‘rest’ or ‘recovery’ and is another important program variable that can be altered to achieve specific training goals.

During an exercise session, a series of sets of different exercises is completed. The term ‘session’ refers to the block of time devoted to the training.

For aerobic exercise sessions it is usual to complete a continuous bout of exercise and so we speak more in terms of session duration or distance covered. In quantifying the load of an aerobic session, the distance covered, whether it be swum, walked, run or biked, is the best indicator of the volume of work. Interval training involves successive repetitions of work and rest intervals. The same principles as for anabolic exercise apply. Interval training of aerobic capacity creates variation from continuous exercise and some research indicates that it is more effective for fat loss.

Monitoring exercise intensity

Rating of perceived exertion

Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is a valuable instrument in controlling exercise intensity in individuals who have difficulty with HR palpation and especially in cases where medication can alter the HR response to exercise (e.g. beta-blockers).4 The best known and established RPE scale is the Borg scale. This scale was developed to allow the participant to subjectively rate their feelings during exercise, taking into account fitness level, fatigue and environmental factors.4 More recently, Robertson and colleagues (2003)8 developed the OMNI scale, which uses verbal and pictorial descriptors along a numerical scale of 0–10 to rate an individual’s perceived exertion. This scale has been successfully validated with children and young adults from both sexes during cardiovascular9 and resistance exercise,8 and may also be an option for exercise sessions with older people and patients. RPE can be taken at different points during an exercise session—following each set of an exercise, for example. It can also be taken after the end of the session, which provides a global rating of the exercise session intensity. This measure of session RPE provides essentially the same information as taking multiple measures throughout the session. A sample RPE scale suitable for older people exercising is contained in Figure 9.1.

The talk test

As a method of making exercise prescription more simple, an informal guideline, widely referred to as the talk test, has arisen within the exercise community. This guideline suggests that if the exercise intensity is such that the patient can just respond to conversation, then it may be just about right (that is, within accepted ranges of exercise training intensity). The ability to converse during exercise (that is, to pass the talk test) has been shown to produce exercise intensities consistently within the parameters suggested in clinical guidelines for exercise training in a variety of populations.10 The talk test appears to be a practical way for people to monitor their intensity during exercise, and an advantage of this method is that it does not require any equipment and no training is needed to understand your ability to speak based on how hard you are working. Because research has shown this method to be very consistent, people can use it in their everyday lives, in gyms or when working out at home, to meet their health and fitness goals while reducing the risk of injuries or other complications that can happen with over-exertion.

VARIATION IN TRAINING

Two foremost factors when designing training programs are: the principle of overload (already discussed); and variation in training. To provide an overload and thereby continue to stimulate the body to adapt, the training must be novel—it must change in character. The more novel the task, the greater will be the changes in performance capacity towards the new task.

Designing a resistance training program which involves performing, say, three sets of 6 RM with six different exercises is relatively straightforward. As strength increases, the 6 RM load lifted increases and the overload is maintained. However, such a program involves no variation and will not prove as effective as a program with greater variation in exercise selection, intensity and volume. The principle of variation relates to changes in program characteristics to match changing program goals as well as to provide a changing target for the body to adapt to. The careful planning and implementation of this variation is known as periodisation.

The importance of variation in training for maintaining motivation should not be underestimated either. Making the program novel and varying the program parameters is important to avoid boredom, staleness and over-training. It will also increase compliance with the program and help avoid people dropping out of the training program.

All program parameters can be modified to achieve variation in the training. Intensity and volume are obvious choices and it is well accepted that within a week there should be heavy and light days, and the volume should undulate over longer periods of 4–12 weeks or more. However, subtle changes to exercise may include:

The key is to alter the nature of the overload to encourage the neuromuscular and cardiorespiratory systems to continue to adapt. This becomes more critical as the person becomes more experienced with this mode of exercise.

BARRIERS TO EXERCISE

No one said it was easy to start an exercise program and then stick to it. There are many barriers to exercise that must be overcome. The greatest by far is lack of motivation to change one’s behaviour. The GP can be a powerful influence in taking the patient through the stages of change necessary to make exercise a lifelong habit. Convincing the patient of the importance of exercise for their health and even instilling some fear of the consequences of a sedentary lifestyle can be all it takes to start the process. Other personal, financial, environmental and societal barriers can make it difficult to exercise. However, these can all be overcome if the motivation of the patient and the support of their family and friends is sufficient. Regardless of a patient’s illness or injury, there is still the potential to perform some form of physical activity. For example, research in patients with various cancers indicates that exercise can be tolerated, is effective for improving physical and mental health and may even be enjoyable. Lack of financial means is often cited as limiting exercise opportunities but effective exercise programs do not necessarily require expensive equipment and specialist trainers. A quality exercise program meeting the minimum recommended requirements can be achieved in the home with little or no equipment if the patient is given specialist advice to enhance their motivation to exercise. It has been demonstrated that the environment in which the patient lives can affect their opportunities for exercise. For example, a neighbourhood that appears to be unsafe, and has graffiti and broken and dangerous pathways is clearly not conducive to pursuing a walking program. Societal influences can also reduce a patient’s willingness to maintain an active lifestyle. Teenage girls are less likely to exercise, because of peer pressure. Certain religious and cultural groups devalue exercise or actively discourage it. Many children believe that their elderly parents should rest, not exercise, especially when ill. Exercise research indicates that this strategy is counterproductive.

All these barriers to physical activity can be overcome with education and support.

SAFETY AND AVOIDING INJURY

The most effective strategy for reducing injury risk is to seek appropriate expert advice prior to embarking on a new exercise program. For people under 35 years of age and with no cardiovascular risk factors or prior history, exercise can be performed with relative safety. If not, then a medical consultation with a GP is recommended to check family history and current health status, and assess possible risk. If risk is deemed low then the patient might join a health and fitness centre or take up a sport or recreational activity of their choosing. However, if there are issues of concern, a consultation with an exercise physiologist is recommended. The exercise physiologist will perform a more detailed assessment of exercise risk, perform various tests to determine the person’s fitness capacity and then design an appropriate exercise prescription. For individuals with existing chronic disease, consultation with an exercise physiologist is advisable to obtain safe and effective exercise guidelines. Patients with existing musculoskeletal or neuromuscular injuries should be treated initially by a physiotherapist and their exercise program modified.

Exercise can be performed in two broad categories of environment:

Millions of people in Australia exercise each day in ‘uncontrolled’ environments without incident. The issue is ameliorating risk, such that high-risk patients should either exercise only in controlled environments or reduce exercise intensity to lower the possibility of adverse events.

EXERCISE AND DISEASE

Meeting the recommended guidelines for physical activity has been demonstrated to markedly reduce the risk of most chronic diseases and so has a strong prophylactic benefit. Once chronic disease progression has produced clinical signs and symptoms there are other key roles for exercise in:

DON’T SUFFER THE SIDE EFFECTS

Treatment side effects are of concern to patient and doctor, and decisions have to be made regarding the relative risks and benefits. In some instances, exercise prescription as adjuvant therapy can alleviate some side effects and improve tolerance of pharmaceutical, radiation and other treatments. For example, testosterone suppression for prostate cancer results in muscle and bone loss and fat gain.11 Fracture risk is increased and recent reports indicate a high incidence of cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome.12 It is now well established that exercise can alleviate all these side effects (Figure 9.2).13 Muscular strength is strongly and inversely associated with incidence of metabolic syndrome and the effect is independent of age and body size. Potential benefits of resistance exercise training to increase muscular strength should be considered in primary prevention of metabolic syndrome.14

CANCER

Much of the research to date on exercise and cancer has focused on cancer prevention, and there is strong benefit particularly for colorectal and breast cancers. Recently, research has begun to examine the effectiveness of exercise programs for patients undertaking therapy. All the evidence collected so far suggests that exercise plays a beneficial role for most patients during cancer treatment. The evidence also shows that there is very little risk of harm when precautions are taken and professional exercise advice is followed closely.16

Regular and vigorous physical exercise has been scientifically established as providing strong preventative effect against cancer, with the potential to reduce incidence by 40%. The effect is strongest for breast17 and colorectal cancer,18 but evidence is accumulating for the protective influence on prostate cancer, although predominantly for more advanced disease and in older men.19

Following cancer diagnosis, exercise prescription can have very positive benefits in improving surgical outcomes, reducing symptom experience, managing side effects of radiation and chemotherapy, improving psychological health, maintaining physical function, reducing fat gain and reducing muscle and bone loss (see Table 9.3). There is now irrefutable evidence from large prospective studies that regular exercise post diagnosis actually increases survivorship by 50–60%, with the strongest evidence currently for breast20 and colorectal cancers,21 over follow-up periods varying from 5 to 18 years (see Ch 24, Cancer).

TABLE 9.3 Summary of exercise-induced changes in cancer patients reported in 26 research papers reviewed by Galvão and Newton 20057

Increased Decreased
Muscle mass Nausea
Muscle strength and power Fatigue
Cardiorespiratory fitness Symptom experience
Maximum walk distance Lymphocytes and monocytes
Immune system capacity Duration of hospitalisation
Physical functional ability Heart rate
Flexibility Resting systolic blood pressure
Quality of life Psychological and emotional stress
Haemoglobin Depression and anxiety
  Body fat

OSTEOPOROSIS

It has been suggested that the most effective way to avoid osteoporosis is to build as large a ‘bone bank’ as possible during life so as to be able to make ‘withdrawals’ as we age without depleting to an osteoporotic level.22 Physical activity is the most effective lifestyle factor to stimulate bone accretion but the activity needs to be ground-based and with higher loads and impacts. For example, bone mineral density in weightlifters is higher than for active controls and this continues into later life.23 The effect is persistent, with one study showing that competitive sport early in life is associated with higher bone mineral density in 75-year-old men.24 Swimming, which lacks impacts and the effects of gravity, does not appear to have a protective effect, and swimmers may actually have a lower bone mineral density than people participating in land-based physical activity.25

Physical activity in later life can improve or at least slow bone loss with ageing, and the most effective activity appears to be anabolic exercise. Walking and similar exercises appear to be too low-intensity, with several studies reporting superior results from high-intensity resistance training,26 and it is significantly more effective than calcium and vitamin D supplementation alone.27

SARCOPENIA

Affecting 60% of people over 80 years old, sarcopenia is a major cause of disability and loss of independence for the elderly. Nutrition (under-nutrition and lack of vitamin D) and decreased hormone levels (growth hormone, testosterone) precipitate some of the muscle loss and the ageing process per se; however, it is clear that reduced physical activity, particularly anabolic exercise, is a major factor. The condition is reversible even in the very old, with appropriate anabolic exercise resulting in large increases in lean muscle mass, fibre cross-sectional area and strength.28 It is well known in athlete and healthy populations that there are optimal combinations of anabolic exercise and nutrition. Specifically, glucose and amino acid intake can be manipulated before, during and after the exercise session to produce much stronger anabolic effects. Supplements such as creatine monohydrate are also effective when combined with anabolic exercise, and more research is being done on their application to patient populations.

ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION

A number of trials have reported reduced risk of anxiety and depression in children who exercise, compared with inactive controls.31 The evidence in adults is less convincing due to a lack of clinical trials, but there are indications of a positive effect.32 However, in older people diagnosed with clinical depression, certain types of exercise have been demonstrated to be more effective than routine GP care.33 This was a single blind control trial which indicated that high-intensity resistance training could produce a 50% reduction in depression rating in 61% of the group. This compared to a similar drop in only 21% of patients in the GP-care group. A 29% reduction was observed in a low-intensity resistance training group, indicating that social interaction was not the only stimulus but the lifting of heavier weights produces some physiological effect benefiting the depressed elderly.

The effects of exercise build gradually but are sustainable throughout life. Initiating exercise in the acute stage will permit a transition to long-term control of depression, hopefully with reduced requirements for medication.

TYPE 2 DIABETES

Exercise improves glucose tolerance and insulin resistance, and is considered very beneficial for preventing and treating type 2 diabetes. In fact, it is estimated that appropriate levels of physical activity could prevent 30–50% of new cases of type 2 diabetes.34 However, benefits for preventing and treating diabetes occur only with regular sustained physical activity patterns. Aerobic exercise is often hindered in older, obese, comorbid patients, and anabolic exercise has been demonstrated in several studies to be safe and more effective.35

REFERENCES

1 Booth FW, Gordon SE, Carlson CJ, et al. Waging war on modern chronic diseases: primary prevention through exercise biology. J Appl Physiol. 2000;88(2):774-787.

2 Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian snapshots. Physical activity in Australia: a snapshot. Online. Available: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4835.0.55.001, 2004/05.

3 Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. 2007 Australian National Children’s Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey. Online. Available: http://www.health.gov.au/nutritionmonitoring.

4 American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.

5 Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2007;39(8):1435-1445.

6 Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2007;39(8):1423-1434.

7 Galvão DA, Newton RU. Review of exercise intervention studies in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(4):899-909.

8 Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Rutkowski J, et al. Concurrent validation of the OMNI perceived exertion scale for resistance exercise. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2003;35(2):333-341.

9 Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Dube J, et al. Validation of the adult OMNI scale of perceived exertion for cycle ergometer exercise. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2004;36(1):102-108.

10 Persinger R, Foster C, Gibson M, et al. Consistency of the talk test for exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(9):1632-1636.

11 Galvão DA, Spry NA, Taafe DR, et al. Changes in muscle, fat, and bone mass after 36 weeks of maximal androgen blockade for prostate cancer. Brit J Urol Int. 2008;102:44-47.

12 Keating NL, O’Malley AJ, Smith MR, et al. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(27):4448-4456.

13 Galvão DA, Nosaka K, Taaffe DR, et al. Resistance training and reduction of treatment side effects in prostate cancer patients. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2006;38(12):2045-2052.

14 Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, et al. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(11):793-801.

15 Jurca R, Lamonte MJ, Barlow CE, et al. Association of muscular strength with incidence of metabolic syndrome in men. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2005;37(11):1849-1855.

16 Newton RU, Galvao DA. Exercise in prevention and management of cancer. Curr Treat Opt Onc. 2008;9(2/3):135-146.

17 Friedenreich CM, Cust AE. Physical activity and breast cancer risk: impact of timing, type and dose of activity and population sub-group effects. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42:636-647.

18 Samad AK, Taylor RS, Marshall T, et al. A meta-analysis of the association of physical activity with reduced risk of colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7(3):204-213.

19 Nilsen TIL, Romundstad PR, Vatten LJ, et al. Recreational physical activity and risk of prostate cancer: A prospective population-based study in Norway (the HUNT study). Int J Cancer. 2006;119:2943-2947.

20 Holmes MD, Chen WY, Feskanich D, et al. Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. JAMA. 2005;293(20):2479-2486.

21 Demark-Wahnefried W. Cancer survival: time to get moving? Data accumulate suggesting a link between physical activity and cancer survival. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(22):3517-3518.

22 Bailey DA, Faulkner RA, McKay HA, et al. Growth, physical activity, and bone mineral acquisition. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1996;24:233-266.

23 Karlsson MK, Hasserius R, Obrant KJ, et al. Bone mineral density in athletes during and after career: a comparison between loaded and unloaded skeletal regions. Calcif Tissue Int. 1996;59(4):245-248.

24 Nilsson M, Ohlsson C, Eriksson AL, et al. Competitive physical activity early in life is associated with bone mineral density in elderly Swedish men. Osteoporosis Int. 2008;19(11):1557-1566.

25 Bellew JW, Gehrig L. A comparison of bone mineral density in adolescent female swimmers, soccer players, and weight lifters. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2006;18(1):19-22.

26 Humphries B, Newton RU, Bronks R, et al. Effect of exercise intensity on bone density, strength, and calcium turnover in older women. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2000;32(6):1043-1050.

27 Kemmler W, Engelke K, Weineck J, et al. The Erlangen Fitness Osteoporosis Prevention Study: a controlled exercise trial in early postmenopausal women with low bone density—first-year results. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2003;84(5):673-682.

28 Fiatarone MA, Marks EC, Ryan ND, et al. High-intensity strength training in nonagenarians. Effects on skeletal muscle. JAMA. 1990;263(22):3029-3034.

29 Larson EB, Wang L, Bowen JD, et al. Exercise is associated with reduced risk for incident dementia among persons 65 years of age and older. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(2):73-81.

30 Sui X, LaMonte MJ, Laditka JN, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity as mortality predictors in older adults. JAMA. 2007;298(21):2507-2516.

31 Larun L, Nordheim LV, Ekeland E, et al. Exercise in prevention and treatment of anxiety and depression among children and young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD004691.

32 Mead GE, Morley W, Campbell P, et al. Exercise for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;4:CD004366.

33 Singh NA, Stavrinos TM, Scarbek Y, et al. A randomized controlled trial of high versus low intensity weight training versus general practitioner care for clinical depression in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60(6):768-776.

34 Manson JE, Spelsberg A. Primary prevention of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Prev Med. 1994;10(3):172-184.

35 Willey KA, Singh MA. Battling insulin resistance in elderly obese people with type 2 diabetes: bring on the heavy weights. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(5):1580-1588.

36 Bennell KL, Hunt MA, Wrigley TV, et al. Muscle and exercise in the prevention and management of knee osteoarthritis: an internal medicine specialist’s guide. Med Clin North Am. 2009;93(1):161-177.

37 Cook NR, Cohen J, Hebert PR, et al. Implications of small reductions in diastolic blood pressure for primary prevention. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(7):701-709.

38 Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2004;116(10):682-692.