Ethanol, Other Alcohols, and Drugs for Alcohol Dependence

Published on 08/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1944 times

Chapter 32 Ethanol, Other Alcohols, and Drugs for Alcohol Dependence

Abbreviations
ADH Alcohol dehydrogenase
ALDH Aldehyde dehydrogenase
BAC Blood alcohol concentration
CNS Central nervous system
GABA γ-Aminobutyric acid
GI Gastrointestinal
5-HT Serotonin
NAD+ Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
NADH Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, reduced
NADD+ Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
NADPH Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, reduced
NE Norepinephrine
NMDA N-methyl-D-aspartate
TNF Tumor necrosis factor
VTA Ventral tegmental area

Therapeutic Overview

Ethanol belongs to a class of compounds known as the central nervous system (CNS) depressants that includes the barbiturate and non-barbiturate sedative/hypnotics and the benzodiazepines. Although these latter compounds are used for their sedative and anxiolytic properties, ethanol is not prescribed for these purposes. Rather, ethanol is used primarily as a social drug, with only limited application as a therapeutic agent. It has been used by injection to produce irreversible nerve block or tumor destruction and is effective for the treatment of methanol and ethylene glycol poisonings, because it can inhibit competitively the metabolism of these alcohols to toxic intermediates.

In cultures in which ethanol use is accepted, the substance is misused and abused by a fraction of the population and is associated with social, medical, and economic problems, including life-threatening damage to most major organ systems and psychological and physical dependence in people who use it excessively. It is estimated that in the United States, 65% to 70% of the population uses ethanol, and more than 10 million individuals are alcohol-dependent. An additional 10 million people are subject to negative consequences of alcohol abuse such as arrests, automobile accidents, violence, occupational injuries, and deleterious effects on job performance and health. Approximately 50% of all traffic deaths are estimated to involve alcohol, and the annual cost of alcohol-related problems in the United States is more than $180 billion. In 2000, there were more than 20,000 alcohol-related deaths in the United States, and alcohol dependence in the United States ranks third as a preventable cause of morbidity and mortality.

In the primary care setting, approximately 15% of patients exhibit an “at risk” pattern of alcohol use or an alcohol-related health problem. A medical history designed to elicit information on alcohol use is an essential feature of a modern medical workup. Clearly, alcohol dependence is a chronic and relapsing disorder much like diabetes and hypertension and can be treated with pharmacological agents to enhance the efficacy of psychosocial/behavioral therapy.

This chapter covers the behavioral and toxicological problems associated with the use of ethanol and reviews the deleterious effects of other alcohols. In addition, the pharmacology of the three currently approved treatments for alcohol dependence are discussed including the aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitor disulfiram, the glutamate receptor antagonist acamprosate, and the opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone.

The uses of ethanol and treatment of ethanol dependence are summarized in the Therapeutic Overview Box.

Therapeutic Overview
Ethanol is used:
Topically to reduce body temperature and as an antiseptic
By injection to produce irreversible nerve block by protein denaturation
By inhalation to reduce foaming in pulmonary edema
In treatment of methanol and ethylene glycol poisoning
Ethanol dependence may be treated with psychosocial/behavioral therapy and an:
Aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitor (Disulfiram)
Glutamate receptor antagonist (Acamprosate)
Opioid receptor antagonist (Naltrexone)

Mechanisms of Action

Ethanol

Before the advent of ether, ethanol was used as an “anesthetic” agent for surgical procedures, and for many years, ethanol and the general anesthetic agents were assumed to share a common mechanism of action to “fluidize” or “disorder” the physical structure of cell membranes, particularly those low in cholesterol. Although ethanol may interfere with the packing of molecules in the phospholipid bilayer of the cell membrane, increasing membrane fluidity, this bulk fluidizing effect is small and not primarily responsible for the depressant effects of ethanol on the CNS. This action, however, may play a role in disrupting membranes surrounding neurotransmitter receptors or ion channels, proteins thought to mediate the actions of ethanol.

Studies suggest that the effects of ethanol may be attributed to its direct binding to lipophilic areas either near or in ion channels and receptors. The ion channels influenced by ethanol are listed in Table 32-1. Ethanol may have either inhibitory or facilitatory effects, depending on the channel, but its resultant action is CNS depression. Because the barbiturates and benzodiazepines exhibit cross-tolerance to ethanol, and their CNS depressant effects are additive with those of ethanol, they may share a common mechanism, perhaps through the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A receptor (see Chapter 31). Ethanol may also exert some of its effects by actions at glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors or serotonin (5-HT) receptors.

TABLE 32–1 Ion Channels Affected by Ethanol

Channel Effects Ethanol Concentration (mM)
Na+ (voltage-gated) Inhibition 100 and higher*
K+ (voltage-gated) Facilitation 50-100
Ca++ (voltage-gated) Inhibition 50 and higher
Ca++ (glutamate receptor-activated) Inhibition 20-50
Cl (GABAA receptor-gated) Facilitation 10-50
Cl (glycine receptor-gated) Facilitation 10-50
Na+/K+ (5HT3 receptor-gated) Facilitation 10-50

* 100 mM ethanol is 460 mg/dL.

The reinforcing actions of ethanol are complex but are mediated in part through its ability to stimulate the dopaminergic reward pathway in the brain (see Fig. 27-8). Evidence has indicated that ethanol increases the synthesis and release of the endogenous opioid β-endorphin in both the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and the nucleus accumbens. Increased β-endorphin release in the VTA dampens the inhibitory influence of GABA on the tonic firing of VTA dopaminergic neurons, whereas increased β-endorphin release in the nucleus accumbens stimulates dopaminergic nerve terminals to release neurotransmitter. Both of these actions to increase dopamine release may be involved in the rewarding effects of ethanol.

Drugs for Alcohol Dependence

Opioid Receptor Antagonist

Naltrexone is an opioid receptor antagonist at both κ and μ opioid receptors (see Chapter 36). Its ability to inhibit alcohol consumption has been attributed to blockade of μ receptors in both the VTA and nucleus accumbens, thereby decreasing the ethanol-induced activation of the dopamine reward pathway.

Pharmacokinetics

Ethanol

Alcohol taken orally is absorbed throughout the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Absorption depends on passive diffusion and is governed by the concentration gradient and the mucosal surface area. Food in the stomach will dilute the alcohol and delay gastric emptying time, thereby retarding absorption from the small intestine (where absorption is favored because of the large surface area). High ethanol concentrations in the GI tract cause a greater concentration gradient and therefore hasten absorption. Absorption continues until the alcohol concentration in the blood and GI tract are at equilibrium. Because ethanol is rapidly metabolized and removed from the blood, eventually all the alcohol is absorbed.

Once ethanol reaches the systemic circulation, it is distributed to all body compartments at a rate proportional to blood flow to that area; its distribution approximates that of total body H2O. Because the brain receives a high blood flow, high concentrations of ethanol occur rapidly in the brain.

Ethanol undergoes significant first-pass metabolism. Most (>90%) of the ethanol ingested is metabolized in the liver, with the remainder excreted through the lungs and in urine. Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) catalyzes the oxidation of ethanol to acetaldehyde, which is oxidized further by ALDH to acetate (see Fig. 32-1). Acetate is oxidized primarily in peripheral tissues to CO2 and H2O. Both ADH and ALDH require the reduction of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+), with 1 mol of ethanol producing 2 mol of reduced NAD+ (NADH). The NADH is reoxidized to NAD+ by conversion of pyruvate to lactate by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and the mitochondrial electron transport system (ETS). During ethanol oxidation the concentration of NADH can rise substantially, and NADH product inhibition can become rate-limiting. Similarly, with large amounts of ethanol, NAD+ may become depleted, limiting further oxidation through this pathway. At typical blood alcohol concentrations (BACs), the metabolism of ethanol exhibits zero-order kinetics; that is, it is independent of concentration and occurs at a relatively constant rate (Fig. 32-2). Fasting decreases liver ADH activity, decreasing ethanol metabolism.

Ethanol may also be metabolized to acetaldehyde in the liver by cytochrome P450, a reaction that requires 1 mol of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) for every ethanol molecule (see Fig. 32-1). Although P450-mediated oxidation does not normally play a significant role, it is important with high concentrations of ethanol (≥100 mg/dL), which saturate ADH and deplete NAD+. Because this enzyme system also metabolizes other compounds, ethanol may alter the metabolism of many other drugs. In addition, this system may be inhibited or induced (Chapter 2), and induction by ethanol may contribute to the oxidative stress of chronic alcohol consumption by releasing reactive O2 species during metabolism.

A third system capable of metabolizing ethanol is a peroxidative reaction mediated by catalase, a system limited by the amount of hydrogen peroxide available, which is normally low. Small amounts of ethanol are also metabolized by formation of phosphatidylethanol and ethyl esters of fatty acids. The significance of these pathways is unknown.

Significant genetic differences exist for both ADH and ALDH that affect the rate of ethanol metabolism. Several forms of ADH exist in human liver, with differing affinities for ethanol. Whites, Asians, and African-Americans express different relative percentages of the genes and their respective alleles that encode subunits of ADH, contributing to ethnic differences in the rate of ethanol metabolism. Similarly, there are genetic differences in ALDH. Approximately 50% of Asians have an inactive ALDH, caused by a single base change in the gene that renders them incapable of oxidizing acetaldehyde efficiently, especially if they are homozygous. When these individuals consume ethanol, high concentrations of acetaldehyde are achieved, leading to flushing and other unpleasant effects. People with this condition rarely become alcoholic. As discussed, the unpleasant effects of acetaldehyde accumulation form the basis for the aversive treatment of chronic alcoholism with disulfiram. The pharmacokinetics of ethanol are summarized in Table 32-2.

TABLE 32–2 Pharmacokinetic Considerations of Ethanol

Pharmacokinetic Parameter Considerations
Route of administration Topically, orally, inhalation, by injection into nerve trunks, or intravenously for poison management
Absorption

Distribution Total body H2O; volume of distribution is 68% of body weight in men and 55% in women; varies widely Metabolism

Elimination Excreted in expired air, urine, milk, sweat

Relationship of Mechanisms of Action to Clinical Response

Ethanol

Like general anesthetics and most CNS depressants, ethanol decreases the function of inhibitory centers in the brain, releasing normal mechanisms controlling social functioning and behavior, leading to an initial excitation. Thus ethanol is described as a disinhibitor or euphoriant. The higher integrative areas are affected first, with thought processes, fine discrimination, judgment, and motor function impaired sequentially. These effects may be observed with BACs of 0.05% or lower. Specific behavioral changes are difficult to predict and depend to a large extent on the environment and the personality of the individual. As BACs increase to 100 mg/dL, errors in judgment are frequent, motor systems are impaired, and responses to complex auditory and visual stimuli are altered. Patterns of involuntary motor action are also affected. Ataxia is noticeable, with walking becoming difficult and staggering common as the BAC approaches 0.15% to 0.2%. Reaction times are increased, and the person may become extremely loud, incoherent, and emotionally unstable. Violent behavior may occur. These effects are the result of depression of excitatory areas of the brain. At BACs of 0.2% to 0.3%, intoxicated people may experience periods of amnesia or “blackout” and fail to recall events occurring at that time.

Anesthesia occurs when BAC increases to 0.25% to 0.30%. Ethanol shares many properties with general anesthetics but is less safe because of its low therapeutic index (see Chapter 3). It is also a poor analgesic. Coma in humans occurs with BAC above 0.3%, and the lethal range for ethanol, in the absence of other CNS depressants, is 0.4% to 0.5%, though people with much higher concentrations have survived. Death from acute ethanol overdose is relatively rare compared with the frequency of death resulting from combinations of alcohol with other CNS depressants, such as barbiturates and benzodiazepines. Death is due to a depressant effect on the medulla, resulting in respiratory failure.

Physiological and behavioral changes as a function of BAC are summarized in Table 32-3. Measures of BAC are important for providing adequate medical care to intoxicated individuals. BAC is calculated based on the amount of ethanol ingested, the percentage of alcohol in the beverage (usually volume/volume, with 100-proof equivalent to 50% ethanol by volume), and the density of 0.8 g/mL of ethanol. BACs are expressed in a variety of ways. The legal limit for operating a motor vehicle in most states is 80 mg/dL, or 0.08%. An example of a typical calculation for a 70 kg person ingesting 1 oz, or 30 mL, of 80-proof distilled spirits is as follows:

TABLE 32–3 Physiological and Behavioral States as a Function of Blood Ethanol Concentrations

Blood Ethanol Concentrations
(mg/dL) % Reactions
0-50 0-0.05 Loss of inhibitions, excitement, incoordination, impaired judgment, slurred speech, body sway
50-100 0.05-0.1 Impaired reaction time, further impaired judgment, impaired driving ability, ataxia
100-200 0.1-0.2 Staggering gait, inability to operate a motor vehicle
200-300 0.2-0.3 Respiratory depression, danger of death in presence of other CNS depressants, blackouts
>300 >0.3 Unconsciousness, severe respiratory and cardiovascular depression, death
>1200 >1.2 Highest known blood concentration with survival in a chronic alcoholic

image

If absorbed immediately and distributed in total body H2O (assuming blood is 80% H2O and body H2O content averages 55% of body weight in women and 68% in men):

image

The average rate at which ethanol is metabolized in nontolerant individuals is 100 mg/kg body weight/hr, or 7 g/hr in a 70-kg person. Chronic alcoholics metabolize ethanol faster because of hepatic enzyme induction. In the calculation above, a male with a body burden of 9.6 g of ethanol would metabolize the alcohol totally in less than 2 hours.

Figure 32-3 shows approximate maximum BACs in men of various body weights ingesting one to five drinks in 1 hour. Rapid absorption is assumed. This figure emphasizes how little consumption is required to impair motor skills and render a person unable to drive safely.

The BAC varies with hematocrit; that is, people living at higher altitudes have a higher hematocrit and a lower H2O content in blood. It is therefore essential to know whether the BAC was determined by using whole blood, serum, or plasma. Urine, cerebrospinal fluid, and vitreous concentrations of ethanol have also been used in estimating BAC.

Because expired air contains ethanol in proportion to its vapor pressure at body temperature, the ratio of ethanol concentrations between exhaled air and blood alcohol (1/2100) forms the basis for the breathalyzer test, in which BAC is extrapolated from the alcohol content of the expired air.

BACs can also be calculated from the weight and sex of the person if the amount of ethanol consumed orally is known. However, this estimate is somewhat higher than actual concentrations because of rapid first-pass metabolism after oral administration. BACs are higher in women than in men after consumption of comparable amounts of ethanol, even after correcting for differences in body weight. This can be attributed to both the volume of distribution and first-pass metabolism of ethanol in women. Women have a smaller volume of distribution than men because, on average, they have a greater percentage of adipose tissue that does not contain as much H2O as do other tissues. In addition, the first-pass metabolism of ethanol, which occurs primarily in gastric tissue, is less in women than men because ADH activity in the female gastric mucosa is less than that in the male. Thus with low doses of ethanol, first-pass metabolism is lower in women, leading to higher BACs; at higher doses, the percentage of ethanol that undergoes first-pass metabolism is relatively small. Women are also more susceptible to alcoholic liver disease for this reason as well as a consequence of interactions with estrogen. This applies to both nonalcoholic and alcoholic women and partially explains the increased vulnerability of women to the deleterious effects of acute and chronic alcoholism. It was once assumed that higher BACs in women were entirely the result of differences in apparent volumes of distribution between men and women; however, they do not account entirely for this difference.

Pharmacovigilance: Side Effects, Clinical Problems, and Toxicity

Ethanol

Ethanol has detrimental effects on many organs and tissues, and knowledge of these actions is important for understanding its hazards. Deleterious effects of ethanol on the liver and other organs resulting from chronic alcoholism are listed in the Clinical Problems Box.

Liver

Ethanol metabolism by the liver causes a large increase in the NADH/NAD+ ratio, which disrupts liver metabolism. The cell attempts to maintain NAD+ concentrations in the cytosol by reducing pyruvate to lactate, leading to increased lactic acid in liver and blood. Lactate is excreted by the kidney and competes with urate for elimination, which can increase blood urate concentrations. Excretion of lactate also apparently leads to a deficiency of zinc and Mg++. A more direct effect of increased NADH concentrations in the liver is increased fatty acid synthesis, because NADH is a necessary cofactor. Because NADH participates in the citric acid cycle, the oxidation of lipids is depressed, further contributing to fat accumulation in liver cells.

The increase in NADH/NAD+ ratio and the inability to regenerate NAD+ may cause hypoglycemia and ketoacidosis. The former occurs in the noneating user of alcohol when hepatic glycogen stores are exhausted (72 hours), and gluconeogenesis is inhibited as a result of the increased NADH/NAD+ ratio. The metabolic acidosis observed in nondiabetic alcoholics is an anion gap acidosis, with an increase in the plasma concentration of β-hydroxybutyrate and lactate.

Acetaldehyde may also play a prominent role in liver damage. If there is an initial insult to the liver, the concentration of ALDH decreases, and acetaldehyde is not removed efficiently and can react with many cell constituents. For example, acetaldehyde blocks transcriptional activation by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPAR-α). Normally, fatty acids activate this receptor, and this action of acetaldehyde may contribute to fatty acid accumulation in liver. Acetaldehyde also increases collagen in the liver.

During ethanol ingestion the intestine releases increased amounts of lipopolysaccharide (endotoxin), which are taken up from the portal blood by the Kupffer cells of the liver. In response to this, these cells release tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and a host of other proinflammatory cytokines. In the face of depleted glutathione and S-adenosylmethionine, liver cells die. This process of secondary liver injury occurs over and above the primary liver injury caused directly by ethanol. In spite of this, there are many heavy drinkers who never develop severe liver damage, indicating a substantial genetic effect in producing alcoholic hepatic damage.

The use of acetaminophen by alcoholics may result in hepatic necrosis. This reaction can occur with acetaminophen doses that are less than the maximum recommended (4 g/24 hours). Ethanol has this effect because it induces the cytochrome P450 responsible for formation of a hepatotoxic acetaminophen metabolite, which cannot be detoxified when glutathione stores are depleted by ethanol or starvation. This condition is characterized by greatly elevated serum aminotransferase concentrations. N-Acetylcysteine is given orally to provide the required glutathione substrate in such patients.

Dependence

It is often difficult to diagnose alcohol dependence. Success depends on obtaining a reliable history from the patient or from a member of the patient’s family. Even if a diagnosis can be made, it is frequently difficult to manage the problem, because treatment is often initiated when the disorder is already well advanced.

Over the past 10 to 15 years, the role of genetic factors in the development of chronic alcoholism has been identified with the hope that early intervention may be more successful. Results of studies involving family members of alcoholics and twins support a predisposition and an increased risk among close relatives. This conclusion that primary alcoholism is genetically influenced is based on several interesting findings.

Studies indicate a threefold to fourfold higher risk of alcoholism primarily in sons but also in some daughters of alcoholic parents. Comparisons in identical twins versus fraternal twins should reveal whether alcoholism is related to childhood environment. Because both types of twins have similar backgrounds, if alcoholism is related to childhood environment, its incidence should be the same in identical and fraternal twins. Most studies show that there is a twofold higher concordance for alcoholism in identical twins than in fraternal twins. In another study alcoholic risk was assessed in male children of alcoholics raised by adoptive parents who were nonalcoholic. A threefold to fourfold higher risk of alcoholism was found in these males. Being raised by alcoholic adoptive parents did not increase the risk for alcoholism. In some studies, in fact, there was a protective effect.

Other studies have categorized alcoholics into several subgroups. One is the alcoholism most frequently seen in males and is associated with criminality; the second is a subtype observed in both sexes and influenced by the environment. Genetic predisposition, however, is merely one of several factors leading to alcoholism. Studies are attempting to reveal biological markers with which to identify potential alcoholics (e.g., differences in blood proteins, enzymes involved in ethanol degradation, and enzymes concerned with brain neurotransmitters and signaling components, including G proteins) to encourage such people to seek assistance sooner.

Effective management of chronic alcoholism includes social, environmental, and medical approaches and involves the family of the person undergoing treatment. Several types of treatment are available, including group psychotherapy (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous) that may be rendered in private and public clinics outside of a hospital setting. Hypnotherapy and psychoanalysis have been used. Studies have shown that pharmacological therapy is of benefit when added to psychosocial/behavioral therapy.

Both psychological and physical dependence are characteristic of chronic alcohol use. The clinical manifestations of ethanol withdrawal are divided into early and late stages. Early symptoms occur between a few hours and up to 48 hours after relative or absolute abstinence. Peak effects occur around 24 to 36 hours. Tremor, agitation, anxiety, anorexia, confusion, and signs of autonomic hyperactivity occur individually or in combinations. Seizures occurring in the early phase of withdrawal may reflect decreased neurotransmission at GABAA receptors and increased neurotransmission at NMDA receptors. Late withdrawal symptoms (delirium tremens) occur 1 to 5 days after abstinence, and while relatively rare, can be life-threatening if untreated. Signs of sympathetic hyperactivity, agitation, and tremulousness characterize the onset of the syndrome. There are sensory disturbances including auditory or visual hallucinations, confusion, and delirium. Death may occur, even in treated patients. Complicating factors in alcohol withdrawal include trauma from falls or accidents, bacterial infections, and concomitant medical problems such as heart and liver failure. The alcohol withdrawal syndrome is more likely to be life-threatening than that associated with opioids.

Management of withdrawal is directed toward protecting and calming the person while identifying and treating underlying medical problems. Clinical data have demonstrated that the longer acting benzodiazepines (chlordiazepoxide, diazepam, or lorazepam) have a favorable effect on clinically important outcomes, including the severity of the withdrawal syndrome, risk of delirium and seizures, and incidence of adverse responses to the drugs used. The benzodiazepines are the treatment of choice. The phenothiazine antipsychotics and haloperidol are less effective in preventing seizures or delirium. Phenobarbital is problematic because its long half-life makes dose adjustment difficult, and in high doses it may cause respiratory depression. Adrenergic β receptor blockers and centrally acting α2 adrenergic receptor agonists are useful as adjuvants to limit autonomic manifestations. Neither class of drugs reduces the risk of seizures or delirium tremens.

Drugs for Alcohol Dependence

Share this: