Chapter 84 Endovascular Management of Intracranial Aneurysms
Microsurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms has been the historical definitive standard for treatment of intracranial aneurysms.1 Today’s surgical techniques routinely achieve complete exclusion of the aneurysm from the circulation without compromise of the parent vessel or arterial perforators in a large number of patients. However, several risk factors may put a patient at increased risk for morbidity and mortality. These factors include the aneurysm’s size, its location, the patient’s age, and the medical condition of the patient.2 In addition, according to the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT), patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage fared better with endovascular coiling than with surgical clipping.3 To overcome some of the limitations of surgical clipping, endovascular treatments were developed. They have grown considerably over the last 15 years, since U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the Guglielmi detachable coil (GDC) in 1995.4,5 This chapter discusses the basic techniques utilized in coiling of ruptured and nonruptured saccular intracranial aneurysms. After a brief discussion of each technique, we give a short review of the results of each form of treatment, concentrating on the large reported case series. Finally, we discuss specific complications related to endovascular treatment of saccular intracranial aneurysms.6,7
Conventional Coiling of a Simple Saccular Aneurysm
Technique
At our institution, all intracranial aneurysm coiling procedures are performed under general anesthesia with neurologic monitoring. An arterial line is placed in the radial artery to closely monitor the patient’s blood pressure. The anesthesiologist is aware of the need to avoid transient blood pressure spikes, especially when intubating or extubating the patient. This is particularly important in patients who have a ruptured aneurysm. The case can sometimes take a few hours; therefore, anesthesia is necessary to maintain immobility, because three-dimensional (3D) imaging and a fluoroscopic road map are very motion sensitive. A 6-French (Fr) sheath is inserted into the right common femoral artery. If balloon remodeling or additional microcatheters are needed, puncture of the left common femoral artery may be necessary. Just after the sheath is inserted in the groin, a baseline activated clotting time (ACT) is drawn. Then, 6 to 10 international units (IUs) of heparin per kilogram of body weight are given intravenously as a bolus. For patients with unruptured aneurysms, the ACT is checked every 30 minutes throughout the procedure and heparin is given intermittently to keep the ACT between 250 to 300 seconds.8 For patients with a ruptured aneurysm, 3000 IU of heparin are given after placement of framing coils; the patient is given additional heparin to maintain an ACT range of 250 to 300 seconds. A syringe of protamine is prepared in advance and readily available to be injected in case of aneurysm rupture. The usually dose is 10 mg of protamine per 1000 IU of heparin. The goal is to obtain an ACT of less than 150 seconds. Likewise, for patients with unruptured aneurysms who have been treated preoperatively with dual antiplatelet therapy, a five-pack of unpooled platelets are kept in preparation in case of rupture.
Patients who have not suffered a recent subarachnoid hemorrhage are preoperatively given 75 mg of clopidogrel (Plavix) and 81 mg of aspirin orally starting 7 days prior to the procedure to prevent thromboembolic complications. If emergent platelet inhibition is needed, the patient is loaded with a single dose of 600 mg of clopidogrel and 325 mg of aspirin. Full platelet inhibition occurs 2 hours afterward. If the procedure needs to be performed urgently, the patient may be given a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. A platelet inhibition assay is drawn for clopidogrel and aspirin prior to treatment, since approximately 25% of patients will have clopidogrel or aspirin resistance.9,10
A complete cerebral angiogram is performed prior to treatment with a 4- or 5-Fr catheter, including bilateral common carotid artery, internal carotid artery, and vertebral artery injections. Additional 3D rotational images are obtained to more accurately define the neck, dome, and size of the aneurysm. Once the diagnostic portion of the procedure is performed, the catheter is exchanged for a 6-Fr guide catheter, which is positioned as close as possible to the aneurysm. It is necessary to have a stable position of the guide catheter to be able to introduce a microcatheter safely into the aneurysm. Because of this, the guide catheter should be positioned as close to the aneurysm as possible. This gives optimal stability of the guide catheter and allows the operator to monitor the guide position on the same road map as the microcatheter during advancement of the coil into the aneurysm. New guide catheters that are more flexible, such as the Neuron (Penumbra, Alameda, CA), can be introduced farther into the intracranial circulation and can be routinely placed in the cavernous internal carotid artery or the basilar artery.11 This allows more stability in advancing devices into the intracranial circulation. This has been a major innovation in the endovascular treatment of aneurysms over the last 3 years. If additional stability is needed to treat an aneurysm, a triple coaxial system consisting of a long sheath introduced into the origin of the great vessel followed by a guide catheter through this may offer enhanced stability in advancing devices through tortuous anatomy for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. If an aneurysm cannot be treated from a femoral artery approach, a brachial, radial, direct carotid, or vertebral artery puncture is another option.12–14
Coil Placement
Additional coils of various sizes and shapes are subsequently introduced into the aneurysm sac until the aneurysm sac is densely packed and no longer filling with contrast or until the microcatheter is pushed outside the aneurysm sac. The first coils used for treatment of intracranial aneurysms were made out of platinum, but there were aneurysm recurrences after treatment; therefore, bioactive coils were introduced with the goal of inducing an exuberant healing response and improved filling volume of the coiled aneurysm. The first bioactive coil was the Matrix (Boston Scientific Neurovascular, Fremont, CA), introduced in 2002. The U.S. FDA approved the Matrix coil based on equivalency with the conventional GDC coil. Four bioactive coils are now available for clinical use: the Matrix, HydroCoil (Microvention, Aliso Viejo, CA), Cerecyte (Micrus, Sunnyvale, CA), and Nexus. The newer coils are manufactured so that the aneurysm sac is filled in a Russian nesting doll manner, from the periphery toward the center.15 Filling coils are placed into the aneurysm sac after the placement of framing coils; once the aneurysm is nearly densely packed, the final coils usually placed into the aneurysm sac are finishing coils.16 These coils are very short and soft. Once the aneurysm is densely packed, the microcatheter is removed slowly from the aneurysm, and a post-treatment angiogram is performed to assess the degree of aneurysm occlusion, parent vessel, and patency of the distal vasculature.
The heparin is reversed after the procedure with protamine and manual pressure, or a closure device is utilized to obtain hemostasis at the femoral puncture site.17 Pressure is usually held on the puncture site for 20 to 30 minutes after removal of the sheath if manual compression is utilized, and the leg is immobilized for 6 hours to prevent groin complications. If a closure device is utilized, ambulation can occur as early as 2 hours after placement.18,19 If there is compromise of the parent vessel, protrusion of coils, or thrombus formation during the coiling procedure, the heparin may be continued overnight with the sheath left in place. Antiplatelet therapy may also be given.
Results of Endovascular Treatment for Ruptured Aneurysms
Two prospective randomized trials have compared outcomes of endovascular coiling versus surgical clipping. The first study was performed in Finland20 and randomized 109 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage who were suitable for either surgery or endovascular coiling. Angiographic outcome in the posterior circulation was significantly better for endovascular coiling, whereas angiographic outcome in the anterior circulation was significantly better for surgery. Angiographic outcomes in the internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery were similar in both groups. The Glasgow Outcome Scale was equivalent in both groups at 3 months. Mortality for technical reasons during surgery was twice that of the endovascular group (4% vs. 2%). One patient in the endovascular group suffered rebleeding following incomplete coiling of the aneurysm.
The second study was the ISAT,3,21 in which nearly 2000 patients predominantly from Europe and with subarachnoid hemorrhage were randomized to surgery or endovascular coiling based on judgment of the treating team. Outcome analysis on the basis of death or dependence at 2 months and 1 year based on the modified Rankin Scale score was the primary parameter of interest in the first publication in 2002. At 1-year postprocedure, 250 of 1063 (23.5%) of the endovascular patients were dead or dependent, while 326 of 1055 (30.9%) of surgical patients were dead. This represents an absolute risk reduction of 7.4% by those treated from an endovascular approach. Delayed rebleeding was more common in the endovascular group; however, several cases were due to incomplete treatments. Seizures were also less common in the endovascular group.
Results of Endovascular Treatment for Unruptured Aneurysms
The data from endovascular treatment versus surgical clipping for unruptured aneurysms do not show a clear benefit for one form of treatment versus the other. A review of modern large clipping and coiling trials for unruptured aneurysms was published in 2005.22 A majority of these trials were nonrandomized and retrospective. Adverse outcomes for endovascular coiling were estimated at 8.8% and for clipping were estimated at 17.8%. The International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm2 adverse outcomes were less common with endovascular treatment (9.3%) than with surgery (13.7%); however, the study was nonrandomized, and the endovascular treatment group included a higher number of elderly patients, larger aneurysms, and aneurysms within the posterior circulation. Surgical adverse outcomes in this study correlated with patient age greater than 50 years, aneurysm size greater than 12 mm, location in the posterior circulation, previous ischemic cerebrovascular disease, and symptoms of mass effect from the aneurysm. Endovascular outcomes were less influenced by these factors. Additional unruptured aneurysm trials are needed.
Coiling of Wide-Neck Aneurysms
Balloon Remodeling Technique
Sidewall Wide-Neck Aneurysm
The main feature that limits the endovascular treatment of aneurysms is the width of the neck. Other features that may limit treatment include the shape of the aneurysm. In 1992, Moret introduced the balloon remodeling technique for treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms.23,24 The technique involves placing a nondetachable balloon across the neck of the aneurysm during each coil placement. The coils remain molded around the balloon after deflation of the balloon, essentially “remodeling the arterial wall.” The technique has been improved over the last 17 years with better coils and balloons. It is routinely used today to treat wide-neck aneurysms, particularly in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, thus eliminating stent placement and the use of antiplatelet agents. Most interventionalists consider an aneurysm neck to be wide when the ratio between the maximum diameter of the aneurysm sac and the size of the neck is 1 or less.
Under the road map, the balloon first is advanced across the neck of the aneurysm. The microcatheter is then advanced into the aneurysm. The balloon is inflated across the neck of the aneurysm, causing temporary occlusion of the neck and parent vessel. The first coil is positioned within the aneurysm sac. The balloon is deflated to test the stability of the coil within the aneurysm sac. If no movement of the coil is observed, the balloon is reinflated and the coil is detached. The coil is not detached if coil movement (meaning that the coil is not well anchored in the sac) is detected after balloon deflation. An angiogram is then performed. This is repeated multiple times until the aneurysm no longer fills with contrast or has a dense coil mass within the confines of its lumen.
Results
Shapiro et al. in 2008 published a literature review with a meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of adjunctive balloon remodeling during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.25 They concluded that there was no higher incidence of thromboembolic events or iatrogenic rupture with the use of adjunctive balloon remodeling compared with unassisted coiling. They also commented that balloon remodeling appears to result in a higher initial and follow-up aneurysm occlusion rates. Mu et al. successfully treated 40 wide-neck aneurysms with the HyperForm balloon remodeling technique, with only 2 failed cases, in 2008.26 Final results consisted of total occlusion in 34 cases (80.9%), subtotal occlusion in 4 cases (9.5%), and incomplete occlusion in 2 cases (4.8%). Nelson and Levy in 2001 treated 22 patients, with aneurysm occlusion on follow-up angiography at a mean of 19 months found in 17 of 20 patients.27 The other two patients died prior to follow-up. Layton et al. treated 73 of 221 aneurysms over a 3-year period with balloon-assisted coiling.28