Echocardiography

Published on 13/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiothoracic Surgery

Last modified 13/02/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 4 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 7456 times

Chapter 7 Echocardiography

Echocardiography, particularly transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), is an important diagnostic tool in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU), and it has a broad range of indications (Table 7-1).1 Echocardiography is essential in the assessment of complex hemodynamic instability,2 in the evaluation of suspected endocarditis,3 and to guide cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation of more than 2 days’ duration.4 In hemodynamically unstable cardiac surgery patients, TEE reliably identifies the cause of the hypotension, often revealing problems that are unsuspected on the basis of the hemodynamic parameters.5

Table 7-1 Indications for Echocardiography in the ICU

Assessment of hemodynamic instability
Assessment of unexplained respiratory failure
Suspected endocarditis
Suspected pulmonary embolus
Suspected aortic dissection
Investigation of a source of embolus
Positioning of an intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) or cannulas for mechanical cardiac support
Prior to cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation of more than 2 days’ duration (TEE only)

To interpret echocardiograms accurately, knowledge of both transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and TEE is required. In addition, echocardiograms performed in the ICU must be viewed in the context of pathophysiologic states, such as mechanical ventilation, inotropic stimulation, sepsis, and alterations in circulating volume. Then appropriate decision-making requires integration of the echocardiographic findings with the overall clinical picture.

The echocardiographic findings for specific conditions are dealt with in the appropriate sections of the book. In this chapter, the principles, imaging modes, and methods of assessment of cardiac function are reviewed. (Much of the information provided in this chapter is drawn from the short textbook Practical Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography.6)

ULTRASOUND MODALITIES

Echocardiography works by using a transducer to transmit and receive ultrasound waves into cardiac and vascular structures. Two-dimensional (2D) and M-mode imaging provide details of structure and motion based on the intensity (amplitude) and time delay of ultrasound waves that are reflected at tissue interfaces. Doppler imaging provides velocity information based on the change in frequency of backscattered ultrasound waves produced by moving structures, usually blood.

M-mode Imaging

M-mode imaging displays reflected ultrasound waves along a single scan line over time (Fig. 7-1). M-mode imaging has very high depth resolution and is therefore ideal for measuring distances along the scan line (e.g., ventricular wall thickness) and for observing rapidly moving structures (e.g., the motion of the aortic valve).

image

Figure 7.1 M-mode imaging. Time is displayed on the horizontal axis and depth on the vertical axis. In this example, the ultrasound beam has been placed across the aortic valve and shows the motion of the aortic leaflets throughout the cardiac cycle.

(Reproduced, with permission, from Sidebotham D, Merry A, Legget M: Practical Perioperative Transoesophageal Echocardiography. Fig. 2.9, p. 24. Philadelphia, Butterworth Heinemann, 2003.)

Doppler Imaging

Four Doppler imaging modalities are in common usage: color-flow, pulsed-wave (PW), continuous-wave (CW), and tissue. Collectively, PW, CW, and tissue Doppler imaging are known as spectral Doppler.

Spectral Doppler

PW (Fig. 7-2) and CW Doppler (Fig. 7-3) display the velocity of blood along a single scan line over time so are therefore analogous to M-mode imaging. PW Doppler displays the velocity at a specific depth along the scan line (at the level of the operator-adjusted sample volume), whereas CW Doppler records velocities at all depths along the scan line. With appropriate machine settings, CW Doppler can record very high velocities (in excess of 5 m/sec), such as those that occur with mitral regurgitation, without aliasing. In contrast, with PW Doppler the Nyquist limit is typically less than 1.5 m/sec. However, PW Doppler has the advantage of being able to define the velocity at a particular depth. Velocity data obtained from CW and PW Doppler imaging can be used for quantitative measurements of flow and pressure. Tissue Doppler imaging is a modification of PW Doppler in which the velocity of solid tissue is displayed. Motion of the mitral annulus obtained with tissue Doppler imaging can be used to assess diastolic left ventricular function (see later material).

image

Figure 7.3 CW Doppler imaging. Time is displayed on the horizontal axis and velocity on the vertical axis. In this example, the PW Doppler beam has been directed through the LVOT and shows the velocities all along the scan line throughout the cardiac cycle. Thus, with CW Doppler the velocity profile has a “filled-in” appearance, compared with the “thin line” obtained with PW Doppler (compare this figure with Fig. 7-2). No flow is seen in diastole, indicating the absence of aortic regurgitation. Flow in systole represents left ventricular stroke volume. The outline of the velocity waveform has been traced to provide the VTI. In this example the VTILVOT is 26.5 cm which, assuming an LVOT area of 3.5 cm2, indicates a stroke volume of about 90 ml (see Equation 7-1 and text for details).

(Modified, with permission, from Sidebotham D, Merry A, Legget M: Practical Perioperative Transoesophageal Echocardiography. Fig. 4.27, p. 64. Philadelphia, Butterworth Heinemann, 2003.)

When using spectral Doppler to measure velocity, it is important that the direction of the Doppler beam and the blood flow (or tissue motion) be similar; failure to achieve this similarity results in an underestimation of the blood velocity. As a rule of thumb, if the blood and the Doppler beam are within 20 degrees of each other, the underestimation of velocity is negligible (<6%).

Transthoracic Versus Transesophageal Imaging

Transthoracic imaging is the standard method of echocardiographic imaging; TEE is reserved for specific indications. TEE has greater utility in the ICU for two reasons. First, in patients who are mechanically ventilated and have undergone recent sternotomy, the image quality in transthoracic imaging is often suboptimal. In one study of ventilated ICU patients, transthoracic imaging produced inadequate views in 64% of patients, compared to 3% with TEE. Second, because many patients are ventilated, intolerance of the TEE probe is less of a problem than in the outpatient setting. Despite these considerations, TTE and TEE both have specific advantages and disadvantages: TTE more reliably visualizes the left ventricular apex and the ventricular aspect of a prosthetic mitral valve, and it allows for more accurate alignment of a Doppler signal with aortic blood flow so that the pressure gradient and valve area can be estimated. TEE provides excellent views of the mitral and aortic valves, particularly the left atrial aspect of a prosthetic mitral valve. However, TEE imaging of the ventricles is prone to foreshortening (in which the ventricular cavity appears smaller than it actually is), which renders estimates of volume unreliable. Both imaging modalities are poor at visualizing the distal ascending aorta and proximal aortic arch. For extubated patients, it is reasonable to image the heart initially with TTE and to proceed to TEE if image quality is inadequate, but for ventilated cardiac surgery patients it may be appropriate to proceed directly to TEE.

STANDARD VIEWS

With TTE, imaging is limited by the ribs and sternum and by the proximity of the heart to the surface of the chest wall. With TEE, imaging is limited by the relationship of the esophagus and stomach to the heart and by the interposition of the airways between the esophagus and the great vessels. Thus, for each modality there are limited ranges of scanning planes from which a broad range of standard views can be obtained. For each standard transthoracic view there is usually an analogous transesophageal view.

Three important TTE scanning planes are the parasternal, apical, and subcostal windows (Fig. 7-4). For parasternal imaging, the patient should be in the left lateral decubitus position and the transducer placed in the third, fourth, or fifth intercostal space, just to the left of the sternum, depending on which view is sought. For apical imaging, the patient should also be in the left lateral decubitus position and the transducer should be placed over the apical impulse (usually the fifth intercostal space, midaxillary line). For subcostal imaging, the patient should be supine, with the transducer positioned to the left of the xiphoid process. Bending the patient’s knees may relax the abdominal muscles and improve imaging. Subcostal imaging may provide superior views to parasternal and apical imaging in ventilated patients, and it has the advantage of not requiring the respositioning of the patient. In all scanning planes, changing the position, angulation, or rotation of the transducer alters the image plane.

With TEE, two important scanning planes are the midesophageal window (tip of transducer 30 to 40 cm from the lips) and the transgastric window (tip of transducer 40 to 50 cm from the lips) (Fig. 7-5). The image is adjusted by manipulating the tip of the TEE transducer. These manipulations involve flexing and retroflexing the tip of the probe, advancing and withdrawing the probe, and rotating the orientation of the sector scan between the horizontal (0 degrees), vertical (90 degrees), and reverse horizontal (180 degrees) imaging planes.

image image

Figure 7.5 A-F, Selected transesophageal views. The views shown are analogous to the transthoracic views shown in Fig. 7-4A-F. The rotation of the sector scan between 0 degrees and 180 degrees is shown in the top right of each image. AL, anterolateral papillary muscle; AML, anterior mitral leaflet; CS, coronary sinus; L, left coronary cusp; LA, left atrium; LAA, left atrial appendage; LV, left ventricle; LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract; PM, posteromedial; RVOT, right ventricular outflow tract.

ASSESSMENT OF SYSTOLIC LEFT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION

Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular function should include assessment of ventricular dimensions, wall thickness, volume status, and systolic and regional function.

Ventricular Dimensions and Preload

Left ventricular chamber size depends on systolic function, diastolic function, and preload. Left ventricular diameter may be evaluated rapidly in a short-axis view (see Figs. 7-4C and 7-5C) with 2D or M-mode imaging. In patients with chronic volume overload, end-systolic and end-diastolic diameters can be used to guide the timing of surgery for patients with mitral and aortic regurgitation.

End-diastolic area (EDA) obtained from a left ventricular short-axis view (see Figs. 7-4C and 7-5C) is a surrogate for end-diastolic volume (EDV) and can therefore be used as a guide to preload. However, because EDA and EDV are dependent on ventricular function, changes in these parameters are more useful than absolute values. There is no threshold value for EDA that predicts fluid responsiveness.7 In patients with normal ventricular function who are euvolemic, EDA is normally 8 to 12 cm2 (excluding the papillary muscles from the trace). However, in patients with chronic left ventricular dilatation, a much higher EDA may be required to optimize preload. In contrast, a patient with severe diastolic dysfunction may develop pulmonary edema at a much lower EDA. The echocardiographic findings in hypovolemia are discussed in Chapter 20.

Buy Membership for Cardiothoracic Surgery Category to continue reading. Learn more here