Disorders of Neuromuscular Transmission

Published on 12/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 5344 times

Chapter 78 Disorders of Neuromuscular Transmission

Normal muscle contraction and force production require the efficient transmission of an electrical impulse from a motor axon to the muscle fibers it innervates. The neuromuscular junction (NMJ), a specialized synapse with a complex structural and functional organization, is the site of electrochemical conversion of nerve impulses into muscle fiber action potentials. The NMJ is particularly vulnerable to autoimmune disorders caused by circulating immune factors (myasthenia gravis and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome), since it has no blood-nerve barrier. Genetic abnormalities and certain toxins may disrupt neuromuscular transmission (NMT) as well. Disorders of NMT produce several characteristic clinical syndromes, described in this chapter.

Myasthenia Gravis

Acquired myasthenia gravis (MG) is the most common primary disorder of NMT. In MG, the binding of autoantibodies to proteins, most commonly the acetylcholine receptor (AChR), disrupts normal NMT. This results in symptomatic muscle weakness that predominates in certain muscle groups and fluctuates in response to effort and rest. The basis for diagnosis is the recognition of a distinctive pattern of weakness on history and examination, and confirmation by diagnostic tests. Several potentially effective treatments are available, and treatment of most patients is effective with minimal long-term morbidity.

Epidemiology of Myasthenia Gravis

MG may begin at any age from infancy to very old age. Epidemiological studies report considerable variability in incidence and prevalence around the world (Meriggioli and Sanders, 2009). While methodological differences may explain some of this variability, biological and genetic factors may also play a role. Recent estimates indicate that the U.S. prevalence is approximately 20/100,000, 60,000 patients total (Phillips, 2004). Epidemiological studies have shown an increasing prevalence over the past 50 years, related to an increase in the frequency of diagnosis in elderly patients but also likely due to improved ascertainment, reduced mortality rates, and increased longevity of the population. Gender and age influence the incidence of MG; women are affected nearly three times more often than men before age 40, but the incidence is higher in males after age 50 and roughly equal during puberty. As the population ages, the average age at onset has increased correspondingly. More men than women are now affected, and the majority of MG patients in the United States are older than 50. Detailed population-based data on clinical and serological subtypes of MG (see Myasthenia Gravis Subtypes) are largely lacking.

Clinical Presentation of Myasthenia Gravis

Patients with MG seek medical attention for specific muscle weakness or dysfunction that typically worsens with activity and improves with rest. Although they may also have generalized fatigue or malaise, it is not usually the major or presenting complaint. Ptosis or diplopia is the initial symptom in approximately two-thirds of patients; nearly all will develop both within 2 years (Sanders and Massey, 2008). Difficulty chewing, swallowing, or talking is the initial symptom in one-sixth of patients, and limb weakness in 10%. Rarely, the initial weakness is limited to single muscle groups such as neck or finger extensors, hip flexors, or ankle dorsiflexors.

Myasthenic weakness typically fluctuates during the day, usually being least in the morning and worse as the day progresses, especially after prolonged use of affected muscles. Ocular symptoms may be intermittent in the early stages, typically becoming worse in the evening or while reading, watching television, or driving, especially in bright sunlight. Many patients find that dark glasses reduce diplopia and hide drooping eyelids. Jaw muscle weakness typically becomes worse during prolonged chewing, especially tough, fibrous, or chewy foods.

Careful questioning often reveals evidence of earlier unrecognized myasthenic manifestations, such as frequent purchases of new eyeglasses to correct blurred vision, avoidance of foods that became difficult to chew or swallow, or cessation of activities that require prolonged use of specific muscles, such as singing. Friends may have noted a sleepy or sad facial appearance caused by ptosis or facial weakness.

The course of disease is variable but usually progressive. Weakness remains restricted to the ocular muscles in approximately 10% to 15% of cases (see Ocular Myasthenia Gravis, later in this chapter), although a higher proportion has been reported in Asian populations (Meriggioli and Sanders, 2009). In the rest, weakness progresses to involve nonocular muscles during the first 3 years and ultimately involves facial, oropharyngeal, and limb muscles (generalized MG). Maximum weakness occurs during the first year in two-thirds of patients. Before the introduction of corticosteroids for treatment, approximately one-third of patients improved spontaneously, one-third became worse, and one-third died of the disease. Improvement, even remission, may occur early on but is rarely permanent (i.e., there is a subsequent relapse). Symptoms typically fluctuate over a relatively short period and then become more severe (active stage). Left untreated, an inactive stage follows the active stage, in which fluctuations in strength still occur but are attributable to fatigue, intercurrent illness, or other identifiable factors. After many years, untreated weakness becomes fixed, and the most severely involved muscles are frequently atrophic (burnt-out stage). Factors that worsen myasthenic symptoms are emotional upset, systemic illness (especially viral respiratory infections), hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, pregnancy, the menstrual cycle, drugs affecting NMT (see Treatment of Associated Diseases and Medications to Avoid, later in this chapter), and fever.

Physical Findings in Myasthenia Gravis

Perform the examination so as to detect variable weakness in specific muscle groups. Assess strength repetitively during maximum effort and again after rest. Performance on such tests may also fluctuate in diseases other than MG, especially if effort varies or testing causes pain. The symptoms of MG do not always vary, particularly in long-standing disease, which can make the diagnosis difficult.

Ocular Muscles

imageMost MG patients have weakness of ocular muscles (Box 78.1). (Videos of MG-related ocular phenomena [Videos 78.1 and 78.2] can be found at www.expertconsult.com.) Asymmetrical weakness of several muscles in both eyes is typical, the medial rectus being more frequently and usually more severely involved. The pattern of weakness is not localizable to lesions of one or more nerves, and the pupillary responses are normal. Ptosis is usually asymmetrical (Fig. 78.1) and varies during sustained activity. To compensate for ptosis, chronic contraction of the frontalis muscle produces a worried or surprised look. Unilateral frontalis contraction is a clue that the lid elevators are weak on that side (see Fig. 78.1). When mild, ocular weakness may not be obvious on routine examination and appear only upon provocative testing (i.e., sustained upward gaze). Eyelid closure is usually weak, even when strength is normal in all other facial muscles, and may be the only residual weakness in otherwise complete remission. This is usually asymptomatic unless it is severe enough to allow soap or water in the eyes during bathing. With moderate weakness of these muscles, the eyelashes are not “buried” during forced eye closure (Fig. 78.2). Fatigue in these muscles may result in slight involuntary opening of the eyes as the patient tries to keep the eyes closed; this is called the peek sign (see Fig. 78.2).

image

Fig. 78.2 “Peek” sign in myasthenia gravis. During sustained forced eyelid closure, patient is unable to bury his eyelashes (left), and after 30 seconds, he is unable to keep the lids fully closed (right).

(Reproduced from Sanders, D.B., Massey, J.M., 2008. Clinical features of myasthenia gravis, in: Engel, A.G. (Ed.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol 91: Neuromuscular Junction Disorders. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 229-252 [Fig. 5], by permission.)

Limb Muscles

Weakness begins in limb or axial muscles in about 20% of MG patients (Kuks and Oosterhuis, 2004). Any trunk or limb muscle may be weak, but some are more often affected than others. Neck flexors are usually weaker than neck extensors, and the deltoids, triceps, and extensors of the wrist and fingers and ankle dorsiflexors are frequently weaker than other limb muscles. Rarely, MG presents initially with focal weakness in single muscle groups, such as a “dropped head syndrome” due to severe neck extensor weakness or isolated vocal cord or respiratory muscle weakness. In untreated patients with long-standing disease, weakness may be fixed, and severely involved muscles may be atrophic, giving the appearance of a chronic myopathy; this is particularly likely in muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibody–positive MG (see MuSK Antibody Myasthenia Gravis, later in this chapter).

Immunopathology of Myasthenia Gravis

The neuromuscular transmitter, acetylcholine (ACh), releases from the motor nerve terminal in discrete packages (quanta) that cross the synaptic cleft and bind to receptors (AChR) on the folded muscle end-plate membrane. Muscle contraction results when ACh-AChR binding depolarizes the end-plate region and then the muscle membrane. Acetylcholinesterase attached to the postsynaptic muscle membrane hydrolyzes the released ACh, terminating its action and preventing prolonged muscle depolarization.

In about 80% to 85% of MG patients, weakness results from the effects of circulating anti-AChR antibodies. These antibodies bind to AChR on the terminal expansions of the junctional folds (Fig. 78.3) (Engel et al., 1977a) and cause complement-mediated destruction of the folds, accelerated internalization and degradation of AChR, and in some cases, they block ACh-AChR binding. Destruction of the junctional folds results in distortion and simplification of the postsynaptic region (see Fig. 78.4) and loss of functional AChR (Engel et al., 1977b). This leads to NMT failure and muscle weakness. MG is a paradigm for an antibody-mediated disease: the physiological abnormality is passively transferable by injection of MG immunoglobulin (Ig)G into mice, and clinical improvement follows removal of circulating antibodies by plasma exchange (see Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis, later in this chapter).

image

Fig. 78.3 Localization of immunoglobulin G (IgG) at a neuromuscular junction in acquired myasthenia gravis. The immune deposits appear on short segments of some junctional folds and on degenerate material in the synaptic space.

(Reproduced from Engel, A.G., Lambert, E.H., Howard, F.M., 1977a. Immune complexes (IgG and C3) at the motor endplate in myasthenia gravis: ultrastructural and light microscopic localization and electrophysiologic correlation. Mayo Clin Proc 52, 267-280, by permission.)

image

Fig. 78.4 Ultrastructural localization of acetylcholine receptor (AChR) at the muscle end-plate in a control subject (A) and in a patient with generalized myasthenia gravis (B). The AChR staining seen in A is virtually absent in B, in which only short segments of simplified postsynaptic membrane react.

(Reproduced from Engel, A.G., Lindstrom, J.M., Lambert, E.H., et al., 1977b. Ultrastructural localization of the acetylcholine receptor in myasthenia gravis and its experimental autoimmune model. Neurology 27, 307-315 [Fig. 3A/B], by permission.)

T-lymphocytes play a pivotal role in the initiation and maintenance of the autoimmune response against the AChR complex. However, the precise mechanism by which this response initiates and is maintained is incompletely understood. Activation of T cells is through the T-cell receptor by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules bound with antigenic peptide, but full activation requires the presence of a second signal (costimulatory molecules). Potentially autoreactive T cells are normally controlled by a variety of immune regulatory mechanisms, including regulatory T cells, which are likely deficient or dysfunctional in MG.

Patients with MG have increased numbers of CD4+ T cells, which regulate the production of AChR antibody (AChR-Ab). The α subunit of AChR contains the majority of T-cell recognition sites. These recognition sites may be different from those of the main immunogenic region that binding antibodies recognize. Sensitization to CD4+ T-cells spreads across the AChR complex as the disease progresses and most MG patients have T cells that recognize multiple epitopes on the AChR α-subunit (Conti-Fine et al., 1997). This epitope spread drives the synthesis of anti-AChR antibodies and accounts for the large and varied antibody repertoire of the myasthenic patient.

Approximately 10% of MG patients (up to 50% of anti-AChR-negative, generalized MG patients) have circulating antibodies to MuSK, a surface membrane component essential in the development of the neuromuscular junction. These anti-MuSK antibodies adversely affect the maintenance of AChR clustering at the muscle end-plate, leading to reduced numbers of functional AChRs. The precise pathophysiology of the weakness and prominent muscle atrophy in anti-MuSK MG is unknown. Muscle biopsy studies have shown little AChR loss, but no detailed studies of NMT in the most affected muscles are available. The events leading to autosensitization to MuSK are unknown, but the thymus gland is probably not involved.

The remaining so-called double-seronegative patients have no known antibodies by conventional assays, even though they may improve with immunosuppressive treatments, plasma exchange, or even thymectomy.

Recently, low-affinity IgG antibodies have been found in about two-thirds of MG patients who were seronegative using conventional anti-AChR and anti-MuSK antibody assays (Leite et al., 2008). These antibodies bind to AChRs that have been clustered into high-density arrays, suggesting that they have relatively low affinity and cannot bind strongly to AChR in solution but do bind to immobilized AChRs in a native conformation.

Myasthenia Gravis Subtypes

A number of MG subtypes (Table 78.1) may be identified based on the clinical presentation, age of onset, autoantibody profile, and thymic pathology (Meriggioli and Sanders, 2009). Interestingly, these subtypes appear to have unique genetic associations, strengthening the concept of distinct clinical entities and disease mechanisms.

Ocular Myasthenia Gravis

Ptosis and/or diplopia are the initial symptoms of MG in up to 85% of patients (Grob et al., 2008), and almost all patients have both symptoms within 2 years of disease onset. Myasthenic weakness that remains limited to the ocular muscles is termed ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) and accounts for approximately 10% to 15% of all MG in Caucasian populations. If weakness remains limited to the ocular muscles after 2 years, there is a 90% likelihood that the disease will not generalize. OMG is more common in Asian populations (up to 58% of all MG patients) (Zang et al., 2007).

Confirmation of the diagnosis of OMG may be a challenge, as RNS studies and anti-AChR antibodies are often negative, and single-fiber electromyography (SFEMG) testing may be required.

MuSK-Antibody Myasthenia Gravis

Antibodies to MuSK have been reported in up to 50% of patients with GMG who lack AChR antibodies (Guptill and Sanders, 2010) and have recently been reported in OMG as well (Bau et al., 2006; Caress et al., 2005). The reported incidence of MuSK-antibody myasthenia gravis (MMG) varies among geographic regions, the highest being closer to the equator and the lowest closer to the poles (Vincent and Lang, 2006). Genetic or environmental factors (or both) presumably play a role in these differences. MMG predominantly affects females and begins from childhood through middle age. In some patients, the clinical findings are indistinguishable from anti-AChR-positive MG, with fluctuating ocular, bulbar, and limb weakness. However, many MMG patients have predominant weakness in cranial and bulbar muscles, frequently with marked atrophy of these muscles (Fig. 78.5). Others have prominent neck, shoulder, and respiratory weakness, with little or no involvement of ocular or bulbar muscles. Electrodiagnostic abnormalities may not be as widespread as in other forms of MG, and it may be necessary to examine different muscles to demonstrate abnormal NMT (Stickler et al., 2005). The potentially more limited distribution of physiological abnormalities also may limit the interpretation of microphysiological and histological studies in MMG, inasmuch as the muscles usually biopsied for these studies may be normal.

Many MMG patients do not improve with cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs); some actually become worse, and many have profuse fasciculations with these medications (Hatanaka et al., 2005). Disease severity tends to be worse, but most improve dramatically with PLEX or corticosteroids (Sanders et al., 2003). More immunosuppression is typically necessary, though long-term outcome is generally good (Guptill and Sanders, 2010). Thymic changes are absent or minimal (Lauriola et al., 2005; Leite et al., 2005), and the role of thymectomy in MMG is not yet clear (Guptill and Sanders, 2010; Sanders et al., 2003). The diagnosis of MMG may be elusive when the clinical features, electrodiagnostic findings, and response to ChEIs differ from typical MG.

Genetics of Myasthenia Gravis

The transmission of MG is not by classic Mendelian inheritance, but family members of patients are approximately 1000 times more likely to develop the disease than the general population. In addition, 33% to 45% of asymptomatic first-degree family members show jitter on SFEMG testing, and anti-AChR antibodies are slightly elevated in up to 50%. These observations suggest that there is a genetically determined predisposition to develop MG.

Several correlations exist between MG and the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes. Certain HLA types (-DR2, -DR3, -B8, -DR1) predispose to MG (see Table 78.1), whereas others may offer resistance to disease. HLA-B8, -DR2, and -DR3 types occur more commonly in patients with EOMG; HLA-B7 and -DR2 in LOMG; and HLA-DR1 in OMG (see Table 78.1). MMG is associated with HLA-DR14-DQ5 (Niks et al., 2006). Different HLA associations have been reported in Asian MG patients, including an association of OMG with HLA-BW46 in Chinese patients (Meriggioli and Sanders, 2009). Non-HLA genes (PTPN22, FCGR2, CHRNA1) have also been found to be associated with MG; some are also associated with other autoimmune diseases and thus may represent a nonspecific susceptibility to autoimmunity. An exception to this is the CHRNA1 gene, which encodes the α subunit of the AChR and may provide pathogenetic clues specific for MG (Meriggioli and Sanders, 2009).

Diagnostic Procedures in Myasthenia Gravis

Edrophonium Chloride Test

Edrophonium and other ChEIs impede the enzymatic breakdown of ACh by inhibiting the action of acetylcholinesterase, thus allowing ACh to diffuse more widely throughout the synaptic cleft and to have a more prolonged interaction with AChR on the postsynaptic muscle membrane. This facilitates repeated interaction of ACh with the reduced number of AChRs and results in greater end-plate depolarization. Weakness from abnormal NMT characteristically improves after administration of ChEIs, and this is the basis of the diagnostic edrophonium test.

The most important consideration in performance of the edrophonium test is the choice of endpoint. Only unequivocal improvement in strength of an affected muscle is acceptable as a positive result. For this reason, resolution of eyelid ptosis, improvement in strength of a single paretic extraocular muscle, or clear improvement of dysarthria have been proposed as the only truly valid endpoints because observed function in these muscles is largely independent of fluctuating effort (Fig. 78.6). Interpret changes in strength of other muscles cautiously, especially in a suggestible patient.

image

Fig. 78.6 Edrophonium test in myasthenia gravis. Before testing (left) there is marked ptosis of the left lid and lateral deviation of the left eye, and the jaw must be supported. Within 5 seconds after injection of 0.1 mg edrophonium (right), function of both lids and left medial rectus are improved.

(Reproduced from Sanders, D.B., Massey, J.M., 2008. Clinical features of myasthenia gravis, in: Engel, A.G. (Ed.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol 91: Neuromuscular Junction Disorders. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 229-252 [Fig. 10], by permission.)

The edrophonium test is reported to be positive in 60% to 95% of patients with OMG and in 72% to 95% with GMG (Pascuzzi, 2003). Improvement after edrophonium is not unique to MG; it is also seen in congenital myasthenic syndromes, the Lambert-Eaton syndrome, intracranial aneurysms, brainstem lesions, cavernous sinus tumors, end-stage renal disease, and in muscle diseases affecting the ocular muscles.

imageThe optimal dose of edrophonium varies among patients and cannot be predetermined. In a study of OMG, the mean dose of edrophonium that gave a positive response was 3.3 mg for ptosis and 2.6 mg for ocular muscle dysfunction (Kupersmith et al., 2003). The lowest effective dose can be determined by injecting small incremental doses up to a maximum total of 10 mg. Inject an initial test dose of 2 mg, and monitor the response for 60 seconds. Subsequent injections of 3 and 5 mg may then be given, but if clear improvement is seen within 60 seconds after any dose, the test is positive, and no further injections are necessary (see Video 78.1). Weakness that develops or worsens after injection of 10 mg or less also indicates an NMT defect, as this dose will not weaken normal muscle.

Common side effects of edrophonium are increased salivation and sweating, nausea, stomach cramps, and fasciculations. Serious complications (bradyarrhythmia or syncope) have been reported in only 0.16% of edrophonium tests (Ing et al., 2005). These symptoms generally resolve with rest in the supine position. Atropine (0.4-2 mg) should be available for intravenous (IV) injection if bradycardia is severe.

Some patients who do not respond to IV edrophonium may improve after injection of neostigmine methylsulfate, 0.5 mg intramuscularly (IM) or subcutaneously (SQ), which has a longer duration of action. Onset of action after IM injection is 5 to 15 minutes. The longer duration of action is particularly useful in children.

Autoantibodies in Myasthenia Gravis

Acetylcholine Receptor Antibodies

Assays measuring antibodies that react with AChR proteins are generally regarded as specific serological markers for MG. The most widely utilized test for MG is the AChR-Ab binding assay. This assay tests serum for binding to purified AChR from human skeletal muscle labeled with radioiodinated α-bungarotoxin. The reported sensitivity of this assay is approximately 85% for GMG and 50% for OMG (Stålberg et al., 2010). Nearly all thymomatous MG patients have elevated AChR antibodies.

Finding elevated AChR antibodies in a patient with compatible clinical features essentially confirms the diagnosis of MG, but normal antibody measurements do not exclude the disease. Assays for AChR antibodies may be normal at symptom onset and become abnormal later in the disease, so repeat testing is appropriate when values obtained within 6 to 12 months of symptom onset were normal.

AChR antibody levels tend to be lower in patients with ocular or mild generalized MG, but these values vary widely among patients with similar degrees of weakness and do not predict the severity of disease in individual patients. Antibody levels fall in most patients after immunosuppressive treatment and may even become normal in some. However, the AChR antibody level is not a consistent marker of overall response to therapy and may actually rise in some patients as their symptoms improve.

False-positive AChR-Ab tests are rare but have been reported in autoimmune liver disease, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), inflammatory neuropathies, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, penicillamine-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis, patients with thymoma but without MG, and in first-degree relatives of patients with acquired autoimmune MG.

Another assay for AChR antibodies measures inhibition of binding of radiolabeled α-bungarotoxin to the AChR. This technique measures antibody directed against the ACh binding site on the α subunit of the AChR. In most patients, relatively few of the circulating antibodies recognize this site, resulting in a lower sensitivity for this assay. These blocking antibodies occur in less than 1% of MG patients who do not have measurable binding antibodies and thus have limited diagnostic value.

AChR antibodies cross-link the AChRs in the membrane and increase their rate of degradation. The AChR-modulating antibody assay measures the rate of loss of labeled AChR from cultured human myotubes. About 10% of MG patients who do not have elevated binding antibodies have AChR-modulating antibodies. Many patients with thymomatous MG have high levels of AChR-modulating antibodies, often exceeding 90% loss of AChR (Vernino and Lennon, 2004).

Antistriational Muscle Antibodies

Antistriational muscle antibodies (StrAbs), which react with contractile elements of skeletal muscle, were the first autoantibodies discovered in MG. These antibodies recognize muscle cytoplasmic proteins (titin, myosin, actin, and ryanodine receptors), and are found in 75% to 85% of patients with thymomatous MG. Titin is a very large filamentous protein essential for muscle structure, function, and development; most of the thymoma-associated antibodies against striated muscle are against titin. The ryanodine receptor (RyR) is a calcium release channel in the sarcoplasmic reticulum of skeletal muscle. Anti-RyR antibodies occur in 75% of MG patients with thymoma but may also be present in LOMG patients without thymoma.

StrAbs are not pathogenic and are also found in one-third of patients with thymoma who do not have MG and in one-third of MG patients without thymoma. They are more frequent in older MG patients and in those with more severe disease, suggesting that disease severity is related to a more vigorous humoral response against multiple muscle antigens (Romi et al., 2005).

StrAbs are rarely elevated in MG in the absence of AChR antibodies and are therefore of limited use in confirming the diagnosis. The main clinical value of StrAbs is in predicting thymoma: 60% of patients with MG with onset before age 50 who have elevated StrAbs have thymoma. However, titin and other striational antibodies are detectable in up to 50% of elderly patients with non-thymomatous MG, so these antibodies are less helpful as predictors of thymoma in patients older than age 60. Elevated StrAbs are also present in autoimmune liver disease and infrequently seen in Lambert-Eaton syndrome and in primary lung cancer.

Electrodiagnostic Testing in Myasthenia Gravis

Repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) is the most commonly used electrophysiological test of NMT. At low rates of stimulation (2-5 Hz), RNS depletes the store of readily releasable ACh at diseased motor end-plates, causing failure of NMT. Characteristically in MG, there is a decrementing response of at least 10% to trains of 2- to 3-Hz stimulation (see Chapter 32B). This may be present at baseline or after a period of exercise (postactivation exhaustion). Although a seemingly simple test, careful attention to proper technique is important to avoid technical errors. The sensitivity of RNS for diagnosing MG reportedly ranges from 53% to 100% in GMG and 10% to 48% in OMG (Meriggioli and Sanders, 2004; Stålberg et al., 2010). RNS is more likely to be abnormal in a proximal or facial muscle and in clinically weak muscles. For maximal diagnostic yield, test several muscles, particularly those that are weak. If RNS is normal and there exists a high suspicion for an NMJ disorder, perform SFEMG of at least one symptomatic muscle.

SFEMG (see Chapter 32B) is the most sensitive clinical test of NMT and shows increased jitter in some muscles in almost all patients with MG (Stålberg et al., 2010). Jitter is greatest in weak muscles but is usually abnormal even in muscles with normal strength. Sixty percent of patients with OMG show increased jitter in a limb muscle, but this does not predict the subsequent development of generalized myasthenia.

In the rare patient who has weakness restricted to a few limb muscles, only a weak muscle may show abnormal jitter. This is particularly true in some patients with MMG (Stickler et al., 2005) (see MuSK-Antibody Myasthenia Gravis, earlier).

Increased jitter is a nonspecific sign of abnormal NMT and can occur in other motor unit diseases. Therefore, when jitter is increased, perform other electrodiagnostic tests to exclude neuronopathy, neuropathy, and myopathy. Normal jitter in a weak muscle excludes abnormal NMT as the cause of weakness.

Recently, measuring jitter with concentric needle electrodes (CNE) has been proposed as an alternative to the specially designed (reusable) single-fiber electrode (Stålberg and Sanders, 2009). Interpret the results with caution, particularly in borderline cases, as signals recorded with the CNE may represent the summation of more than one single-fiber action potential, which will decrease the apparent jitter.

Comparison of Diagnostic Techniques in Myasthenia Gravis

Plan diagnostic testing based on the clinical presentation and distribution of weakness (Table 78.2). The edrophonium test is often diagnostic in patients with ptosis or ophthalmoparesis but is less useful in assessing other muscles. The presence of serum AChR or anti-MuSK antibodies virtually ensures the diagnosis of MG, but their absence does not exclude it. RNS confirms impaired NMT but is frequently normal in mild or purely ocular disease. Almost all patients with MG have increased jitter, and normal jitter in a weak muscle excludes MG as the cause of the weakness. Neither electrodiagnostic test is specific for MG, because increased jitter, even abnormal RNS, occurs in other motor unit disorders that impair NMT.

Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis

The outlook for patients with MG has improved considerably in recent years, largely due to advances in intensive care medicine and the use of immunomodulating agents. The therapeutic goal is to return the patient to normal function as rapidly as possible while minimizing the side effects of therapy. A number of therapeutic options are available (Table 78.3), but treatment must be individualized according to the extent (ocular versus generalized) and severity (mild to severe) of disease, and the presence or absence of concomitant disease (including but not limited to other autoimmune diseases and thymoma). The basis of treatment decisions for individual patients is the predicted course of disease and the predicted response to specific treatments. Successful treatment of MG requires close medical supervision and long-term follow-up. Consider the return of weakness after a period of improvement as a herald of further progression requiring reassessment of current treatment and evaluation for underlying systemic disease or thymoma.

Symptom Management: Cholinesterase Inhibitors

Pyridostigmine bromide and neostigmine bromide are the most commonly used ChEIs. Pyridostigmine is generally preferred because it has a lower frequency of gastrointestinal side effects and longer duration of action. The initial oral dose in adults is 30 to 60 mg every 4 to 8 hours. The equivalent dose of neostigmine is 7.5 to 15 mg. In infants and children, the initial oral dose of pyridostigmine is 1 mg/kg, and of neostigmine is 0.3 mg/kg (Table 78.4). Pyridostigmine is available as syrup (60 mg/5 mL) for children or for nasogastric tube administration in patients with impaired swallowing. A timed-release tablet of pyridostigmine (180 mg) is useful as a bedtime dose for patients who are too weak to swallow in the morning. Its absorption is erratic, however, leading to possible overdosage and underdosage, and it is not useful during waking hours.

No fixed dosage schedule suits all patients. The need for ChEIs varies from day to day and during the same day. Different muscles respond differently; with any dose, some muscles get stronger, others do not change, and still others may become weaker. The drug schedule should be titrated to produce an optimal response in muscles causing the greatest disability. Patients with oropharyngeal weakness may require doses timed to provide optimal strength during meals. Aim for a dose that provides definite improvement in the most important muscle groups within 30 to 45 minutes and which wears off before the next dose. Acute overdosage may cause cholinergic weakness of respiratory muscles and apnea.

Adverse effects of ChEIs result from ACh accumulation at muscarinic receptors on smooth muscle and autonomic glands and at nicotinic receptors of skeletal muscle. Central nervous system side effects are rare with the doses used to treat MG. Gastrointestinal complaints are common: queasiness, nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, loose stools, and diarrhea. Increased bronchial and oral secretions may be a serious problem in patients with swallowing or respiratory insufficiency. These symptoms of muscarinic overdosage may indicate that nicotinic overdose (weakness) is also occurring. Drugs that suppress the gastrointestinal side effects include loperamide hydrochloride, propantheline bromide, glycopyrrolate, and diphenoxylate hydrochloride with atropine. Some of these drugs themselves produce weakness at high dosages.

Bromism, presenting as acute psychosis, is a rare complication of large amounts of pyridostigmine bromide. Measurement of the serum bromide level confirms the diagnosis. Some patients are allergic to bromide and develop a rash even at modest doses; for these patients, ambenonium chloride is an alternative medication.

Preliminary studies of an antisense oligonucleotide (EN101) that blocks expression of a splice isoform of acetylcholinesterase have been published (Sussman et al., 2008). The drug appears to be safe and the beneficial effects long lasting—many hours compared to 3 to 5 hours for pyridostigmine. Further studies are ongoing.

Short-Term (Rapid-Onset) Immune Therapies

Plasma Exchange

Plasma exchange (PLEX) temporarily reduces the levels of circulating antibodies and produces improvement in a matter of days in the vast majority of patients with acquired MG. It is generally used for short-term treatment of severe MG, myasthenic crisis, in preparation for surgery (e.g., thymectomy), or to prevent corticosteroid-induced exacerbations. A typical course of PLEX consists of 5 to 6 exchanges administered on an every-other-day schedule, during which 2 to 3 L of plasma are removed. Decisions regarding the total number of exchanges depend upon clinical response and tolerability, but more than 6 exchanges may be required in some patients.

The benefit from a course of PLEX typically begins to wear off after 4 weeks but may persist for as long as 3 months. Nevertheless, longer-lasting immune therapy maintains control of symptoms. Most patients who respond to the first course of PLEX respond again to subsequent courses. Repeated exchanges do not have a cumulative benefit, and we do not use PLEX as chronic maintenance therapy unless other treatments fail or are contraindicated.

Side effects during PLEX include paresthesias from citrate-induced hypocalcemia, symptomatic hypotension, transitory cardiac arrhythmias, nausea, lightheadedness, chills, and pedal edema. The major complications relate to the use of large-bore venous access. The risks of subclavian lines, arteriovenous shunts, or grafts for venous access include thromboses, thrombophlebitis, subacute bacterial endocarditis, and pneumothorax.

Specific removal of circulating anti-AChR pathogenic factors may be accomplished using immunoadsorption columns, some of which use immobilized AChR to remove autoantibodies from MG serum. Further development of this technique may provide a more efficient and safer alternative to PLEX.

Intravenous Immunoglobulin

Improvement in MG occurs in 50% to 100% of MG patients after infusion of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), typically given at a dose of 2 g/kg given over 2 to 5 days. Improvement usually begins within 1 week and lasts for several weeks or months. Class I evidence supports the use of IVIG to treat patients with refractory exacerbations of MG (Donofrio et al., 2009), but there is little evidence to advise the clinician on the proper dosing of IVIG and duration of therapy. A recent double-blind placebo-controlled trial in MG patients with worsening weakness showed that IVIG induced rapid improvement in muscle strength, but this effect was more pronounced and likely more clinically significant in patients with moderate to severe MG (Zinman et al., 2007).

IVIG induces rapid improvement in patients with severe disease or crisis, reduces perioperative morbidity prior to surgery, and may be used chronically in selected refractory patients. IVIG may be particularly useful as an alternative to PLEX in children with limited vascular access. Although IVIG has demonstrated similar efficacy to PLEX in the treatment of MG exacerbations, it is unclear whether it is as effective in true MG crisis, since the published comparison studies generally used suboptimal PLEX regimens and did not directly compare onset of improvement. Common side effects of IVIG include headaches, chills, and fever, which usually improve if infusion rates are slowed. Serious side effects are rare but include renal toxicity, stroke, leukopenia, and aseptic meningitis. Lyophilized forms of IVIG may be associated with greater prevalence of adverse events in patients with neuromuscular diseases (Nadeau et al., 2010).

Long-Term Immune Therapies

A number of medications are useful in MG, based on their ability to suppress the immune system nonspecifically. While often quite beneficial, these medications require careful attention and should be tapered to the minimum effective dose to reduce long-term risk and toxicity.

Corticosteroids

Corticosteroids were the first immunosuppressants to be widely used in MG and remain the most commonly used immune therapy today. Prednisone produces marked improvement or complete relief of symptoms in more than 75% of MG patients (Pascuzzi et al., 1984) and some improvement in most of the rest. Much of the improvement occurs in the first 6 to 8 weeks, but strength may increase to total remission in the following months, even while tapering the dose. Patients with recent onset of symptoms have the best responses, but those with chronic disease also may respond. The severity of disease does not predict the ultimate improvement. Patients with thymoma usually respond well to prednisone, before or after removal of the tumor.

The initial prednisone dose (0.75-1 mg/kg/day) is high and continued until sustained improvement occurs, which is usually within 2 weeks. Then taper the dose over many months to the smallest amount necessary to maintain improvement, which is ideally less than 20 mg every other day. The rate of dose decrease is individualized; patients who have a rapid initial response may reduce the dose on alternate days by 20 mg each month to 60 mg every other day. If the initial response is less dramatic, it may be preferable to change to an alternate-day dose of 100 to 120 mg and taper this by 20 mg each month to 60 mg every other day, then taper the dose more slowly to a target dose of 10 mg every other day as long as improvement persists. If any weakness returns during dose reduction, the dose should be increased, another immunosuppressant should be added, or both, to prevent further worsening. Stopping the drug almost invariably leads to return of weakness, but a very low dose (5-10 mg every other day) may be sufficient to maintain good improvement in many patients.

Transitory worsening of weakness occurs in approximately one-third to half of patients treated with high-dose daily prednisone (Pascuzzi et al., 1984). This usually begins within the first 7 to 10 days with high prednisone doses and lasts for several days. In mild cases, ChEIs usually manage this worsening. However, hospitalization or administration of PLEX or IVIG during steroid initiation is advisable in patients with significant oropharyngeal or respiratory symptoms.

An alternative approach favored by some is to begin prednisone with 20 mg/day and increase the dose by 10 mg every 1 to 2 weeks until improvement begins. The dose is maintained until improvement is maximum, and then tapered as above. Exacerbations still may occur with this protocol, but the onset of such worsening and the therapeutic response are less predictable. A similar dose schedule is common in OMG (see Ocular Myasthenia Gravis, later in this chapter).

Prednisone is inexpensive, has a quick onset of response, and an established track record in MG, but its use is limited by the numerous and frequent side effects (Table 78.5), the severity and frequency of which increase when high doses are given for more than 1 month. Most side effects improve with dose reduction and become minimal at less than 20 mg every other day. A low fat, low-sodium diet, and exercise will minimize the weight gain associated with prednisone use. Supplemental calcium and vitamin D with bisphosphonate therapy are useful to counter osteopenia, particularly in postmenopausal women. Treat patients with peptic ulcer disease or symptoms of gastritis accordingly. Prednisone is contraindicated in patients with untreated tuberculosis.

Table 78.5 Common Side Effects of Corticosteroids

Side Effect Treatment/Prevention
Weight gain/fluid retention Low calorie, low-fat, sodium-restricted diet; exercise
Glucose intolerance Monitor blood glucose/treat
Osteopenia/osteoporosis/avascular necrosis Calcium and vitamin D supplementation, bisphosphonates
Hypertension Monitor/treat
Cataracts/glaucoma At least yearly ophthalmological evaluation
Steroid myopathy Exercise/high-protein diet
Peptic ulcer disease Proton pump inhibitors, H2 blockers

Prednisone given with azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), or other immunosuppressant drugs may produce more benefit than either drug alone (see next section, Immunosuppressant Drugs).

Immunosuppressant Drugs

Several immunosuppressant drugs are reportedly effective in MG (see Table 78.3). Azathioprine (AZA) is a purine antimetabolite that interferes with T- and B-cell proliferation and is the nonsteroidal immunosuppressant with the longest track record in MG. It improves weakness in most patients, but benefit may not be apparent for 6 to 12 months. The initial dose is 50 mg/day, which increases by 50 mg/day every 7 days to a total of 150 to 200 mg/day (2-3 mg/kg/day). After achieving maximum benefit, slowly taper the dose to the minimal effective dose, which may be as low as 50 mg/day. Symptom recurrence follows discontinuation or reduction below the minimal effective dose. Patients may respond better and more rapidly when starting prednisone concurrently. An idiosyncratic reaction with flulike symptoms occurs within 10 to 14 days after starting AZA in 15% to 20% of patients; this reaction requires stopping the drug. The use of divided doses after meals or by dose reduction minimizes gastrointestinal irritation. Leukopenia and even pancytopenia can occur at any time during treatment but are not common. Liver toxicity is also possible and heralded by elevations in the serum transaminases. To guard against this, monitor complete blood cell counts and liver enzymes every week during the first month, every 1 to 3 months for a year, and every 3 to 6 months thereafter. Reduce the dose if the peripheral white blood cell (WBC) count falls below 3500 cells/mm3, and then gradually increase after the WBC count rises. Stop the drug immediately if counts fall below 1000 WBC/mm3. Also discontinue treatment if the serum transaminase concentration exceeds twice the upper limit of normal, and restart at lower doses after values become normal. There are rare reports of AZA-induced pancreatitis, but the cost-effectiveness of monitoring serum amylase concentrations is not established.

MMF selectively blocks purine synthesis, thereby suppressing both T- and B-cell proliferation. Pilot studies and retrospective series indicate efficacy in MG (Hehir et al., 2010; Meriggioli et al., 2003). However, data from two randomized controlled trials failed to show additional benefit of MMF over 20 mg daily prednisone as initial immunotherapy of MG (The Muscle Study Group, 2008) and did not show a significant steroid-sparing effect of MMF in patients on prednisone (Sanders et al., 2008). Several factors have been cited as possible explanations for these negative results, including the generally mild disease of the patients, the better-than-expected response to relatively low-dose daily prednisone, and the short duration of the studies (Sanders and Siddiqi, 2008). The clinical efficacy of MMF in MG remains an open question, but it continues to be widely used in the treatment of MG as monotherapy or as a steroid-sparing agent, mainly because many experts are convinced that it is effective, and it has a favorable side-effect profile.

The typical MMF dose is 1000 mg twice daily, but doses up to 3000 mg/day have been used. In general, side effects are relatively mild and most commonly consist of diarrhea, nausea, and abdominal pain. However, PML has occurred in patients treated with MMF, although most patients were on multiple nonsteroidal immunosuppressant medications.

Cyclosporine (CYA) is a potent immunosuppressant that binds to the cytosolic protein, cyclophilin (immunophilin), of immunocompetent lymphocytes, especially T lymphocytes. This complex of CYA and cyclophilin inhibits calcineurin, which activates transcription of interleukin 2 (IL-2). It also inhibits lymphokine production and interleukin release and leads to reduced function of effector T cells. Retrospective analyses have reported improvement in most MG patients taking CYA, with or without corticosteroids (Ciafaloni et al., 2000). Many medications interact with CYA and must be avoided or used with caution. Hypertension and cumulative renal toxicity are common reactions of CYA, and we use this agent in MG only when other immunosuppressants are contraindicated or ineffective.

The initial dose of CYA is 5 to 6 mg/kg in two divided doses 12 hours apart. Measure the serum trough level of CYA after 1 month, and adjust the dose to produce a CYA concentration of 75 to 150 ng/mL. Monitor blood pressure and serum creatinine monthly, and adjust the dose to keep the creatinine below 150% of pretreatment values. Thereafter, measure the serum creatinine concentration at least every 2 to 3 months, more frequently if a medication is started known to interact with CYA.

Improvement begins within 2 to 3 months in most patients; maximum improvement requires 6 months or longer. As with AZA, prednisone may be started simultaneously with CYA, and the dose tapered or discontinued altogether after CYA has become effective. Then taper the CYA dose to the minimum effective dose, which may be as little as 50 mg/day.

Recent reports indicate that tacrolimus (FK506) may be effective in the treatment of MG (Evoli et al., 2002; Ponseti et al., 2005), including a randomized (though unblinded) study in 36 de novo MG patients (Nagane et al., 2005). Use of doses from 3 to 5 mg/day have a favorable side effect profile. Tacrolimus is in the same class of immunosuppressants as CYA, with a similar mechanism of action. It appears to be less nephrotoxic than CYA at doses used in published MG reports, but hyperglycemia due to transcriptional inhibition of insulin is relatively common in transplant patients receiving tacrolimus. Pending further study, it should be considered as adjunctive therapy in refractory MG and as a steroid-sparing agent in patients intolerant or unresponsive to AZA, MMF, and CYA.

Cyclophosphamide (CP) given IV in monthly pulsed doses has been used in severe refractory GMG (de Feo et al., 2002; Drachman et al., 2002). In a randomized controlled trial, patients with refractory MG had improved muscle strength and reduced steroid requirement after pulsed doses of IV CP (500 mg/m2). There are reports of therapeutic responses in refractory MG after a one-time, high-dose (50 mg/kg) IV course of CP for 4 days, followed by rescue therapy. Side effects of CP are common and potentially serious and include myelosuppression, hemorrhagic cystitis, and an increased risk for infection and malignancy. For this reason, CP should be reserved for patients with truly refractory severe disease.

In a recent review of 1000 MG patients who received immunosuppressants for at least 1 year, all forms of MG benefited from immunosuppression: the rate of remission or minimal manifestations (Jaretzki et al., 2000) ranged from 85% in OMG to 47% in thymoma-associated disease (Sanders and Evoli, 2010). Prednisone was used in the great majority of these patients, and AZA was the first-choice nonsteroidal immunosuppressant; MMF and CYA were used as second-choice agents. Treatment was ultimately discontinued in nearly 20% of anti-AChR-Ab-positive EOMG patients, but in only 7% of thymoma cases. The risk of complications was related to drug dosage, treatment duration, and patient characteristics, the highest rate of serious side effects (20%) occurring in LOMG and the lowest (4%) in early-onset disease.

Effective use of immunosuppressants in MG requires a long-term commitment; few patients maintain improvement unless continuing therapy at effective doses. The long-term risk of malignancy is not established, so use the minimal maintenance dose of immunosuppressant medications required to keep the MG in control.

Thymectomy

Suspected thymoma requires surgical resection regardless of age. In addition to removing all tumor tissue, remove any residual normal thymus tissue via an extended complete thymectomy. Since most patients will require long-term immunosuppression, it is reasonable to begin treatment (e.g., AZA with steroids) before or immediately after surgery.

Thymectomy is widely used as treatment for nonthymomatous MG, although no prospective controlled study of efficacy exists. Based on review of existing studies, the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology concluded that MG patients undergoing thymectomy are twice as likely to attain medication-free remission, 1.6 times as likely to become asymptomatic, and 1.7 times as likely to improve (Gronseth and Barohn, 2000). However, the authors expressed uncertainty as to whether the observed improvement was due to thymectomy or explicable by differences in baseline characteristics. Their practice recommendations were that for patients with nonthymomatous autoimmune MG, thymectomy is recommended as an option to increase the probability of remission or improvement. An international prospective single-blinded randomized trial of thymectomy in nonthymomatous MG is currently ongoing, and will hopefully clarify this issue (Newsom-Davis et al., 2008).

The response to thymectomy is unpredictable, and impairment may continue for months or years after surgery, even in patients who do ultimately improve. The best responses are in young people, especially women, early in the disease, but improvement can occur even after many years of symptoms.

The preferred surgical approach has traditionally been a transthoracic sternal-splitting procedure that allows wide exploration of the anterior mediastinum. Transcervical and endoscopic approaches have less postoperative morbidity and shorter recovery times but may not allow sufficient exposure for total thymic removal and are not recommended when there is a thymoma. However, it has yet to be determined whether the extent of thymic removal determines outcome in nonthymomatous MG. Robotic video-assisted thorascopic thymectomy combines the advantages of minimally invasive techniques with added maneuverability and enhanced visualization, which reportedly permits an extended thymectomy similar to that using a transsternal approach. Without a prospective study comparing different techniques, the value of different surgical approaches remains unclear.

In nonthymomatous MG, we recommend thymectomy in virtually all early-onset anti-AChR-positive MG patients, and as an option in anti-AChR-positive MG with onset between ages 40 to 60. Others also recommend thymectomy for older patients. AChR-antibody-negative patients also may improve after thymectomy, some to the point of remission, and we do not base the decision to perform thymectomy on the presence or level of these antibodies alone. The role of thymectomy in MuSK antibody–positive MG has not yet been determined.

We consider repeat thymectomy when relapse follows a good response to the initial surgery or if there is concern that thymic tissue removal had been incomplete. MRI with appropriate cardiac gating may be useful in identifying residual thymus tissue, although many authors believe that the clinical suspicion should be the basis upon which repeat surgery is considered (Jaretzki, 2003).

Thymectomy is generally not a recommendation for ocular MG, but these patients also may improve after thymectomy.

Evolving Treatments

Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the B-cell surface marker, CD20. Case reports and small case series suggest that MG patients, particularly those with anti-MuSK antibodies, may improve after treatment with rituximab (Guptill and Sanders, 2010; Meriggioli and Sanders, 2009). Controlled trials are needed in both anti-AChR and anti-MuSK-positive disease.

A single case series reports improvement in MG following treatment with etanercept (recombinant human tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor:Fc) (Tuzun et al., 2005). Patients with lower pretreatment plasma IL-6 and interferon (IFN)-γ levels responded better. The mechanism of action in MG is unknown, and its role in treatment is yet unproven.

Complement inhibition has been shown to be effective in experimental MG (Soltys et al., 2009), and clinical trials in human MG are underway. Autologous stem cell transplantation has been performed in refractory MG patients (Pringle and Atkins, 2005), but the role of this procedure for MG and other autoimmune disorders is unclear at this time.

Association of Myasthenia Gravis with Other Diseases

MG is often associated with other immune-mediated diseases, especially hyperthyroidism and rheumatoid arthritis. Seizures occur with increased frequency in children with MG. One-fifth of our MG patients have another disease: 7% had diabetes mellitus before corticosteroid treatment, 6% have thyroid disease, 3% have an extrathymic neoplasm, and less than 2% have rheumatoid arthritis. Reports of MG cases related to human immunodeficiency virus and after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation suggest a more than coincidental relationship. Extrathymic malignancies have been reported to be common in MG patients, especially in the older age group, possibly owing to a common background of immune dysregulation (Levin et al., 2005).

Treatment of Associated Diseases and Medications to Avoid

It is important to recognize the effect of concomitant diseases and their treatment on myasthenic symptoms. Thyroid disease requires vigorous treatment; both hypo- and hyperthyroidism adversely affect myasthenic weakness. Intercurrent infections require immediate attention because they exacerbate MG and can be life threatening in immunosuppressed patients.

Use drugs that adversely affect NMT (Box 78.2) with caution. Many antibiotics fall into this category, particularly aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and macrolides. Ophthalmic preparations of beta-blockers and aminoglycoside antibiotics may cause worsening of ocular symptoms. Never use d-penicillamine, because it can induce MG. When using corticosteroids to treat concomitant illness, anticipate and explain the potential adverse and beneficial effects to the patient.

Box 78.2 Medications That Adversely Affect Neuromuscular Transmission

MG may develop in patients during IFNα-2b treatment for malignancy and chronic active hepatitis C. In some, MG has presented with myasthenic crisis. The mechanism is unknown, but the expression of IFN-γ at motor end-plates of transgenic mice results in weakness and abnormal NMJ function that improve with ChEIs. This suggests an autoimmune humoral response, similar to that in human MG.

The administration of botulinum toxin injections to patients with neuromuscular disease such as MG risks systemic side effects including dysphagia and respiratory compromise. Administer only with great caution.

We recommend annual vaccination against influenza (including H1N1) for most patients with MG. Vaccination against pneumococcus is a recommendation for at-risk patients before starting prednisone or other immunosuppressive drugs. Never give live attenuated vaccines to immunosuppressed patients. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report that those taking less than 2 mg/kg/day of prednisone or every-other-day prednisone are not at risk. Patients with prior thymectomy should not receive the yellow fever vaccine.

Special Situations

Myasthenic Crisis

Myasthenic crisis is respiratory failure from myasthenic weakness. An identifiable precipitating event such as infection, aspiration, surgery, or medication change precedes most episodes of crisis. Cholinergic crisis is respiratory failure from overdose of ChEIs and was more common before the introduction of immunosuppressive therapy, when using very large dosages of ChEIs.

In MG patients with progressive respiratory symptoms, no single factor determines the need for ventilatory support. The safest approach is to admit the patient to an intensive care unit and observe closely for impending respiratory insufficiency. Serial measurements of negative inspiratory force (NIF) provide the best measure of deteriorating respiratory function in MG. Respiratory assistance is needed when the NIF is less than −20 cm H2O, when tidal volume is less than 4 to 5 mL/kg body weight and maximum breathing capacity is less than three times the tidal volume, or when the forced vital capacity is less than 15 mL/kg body weight. Use a mask and breathing bag acutely. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation using bilevel positive-pressure ventilation (BiPAP) may avoid the need for intubation in patients in crisis without hypercapnia (Rabinstein and Wijdicks, 2002). In patients with Pco2 greater than 50 mm Hg, tracheal intubation should be done with a low-pressure, high-compliance cuffed endotracheal tube. A volume-controlled respirator set to provide tidal volumes of 400 to 500 mL and automatic sighing every 10 to 15 minutes is preferred. Check the pressure of the tube cuff frequently, and verify the tube position daily by chest radiographs. Use assisted respiration whenever possible so that the patient’s own respiratory efforts trigger the respirator. Use an oxygen-enriched atmosphere only when arterial blood oxygen values fall below 70 mm Hg. Humidify the inspired gas to at least 80% at 37°C to prevent drying of the tracheobronchial tree. Remove tracheal secretions periodically using aseptic aspiration techniques. Low-pressure, high-compliance endotracheal tubes may be tolerable for long periods and usually obviate the need for tracheostomy.

Many case series report short-term benefit from PLEX and IVIG in myasthenic crisis. Retrospective studies suggest that both are equally effective in disease stabilization (Murthy et al., 2005). Others suggest that PLEX is superior, producing more rapid respiratory improvement (Qureshi et al., 1999). We recommend PLEX in the treatment of crisis except when there is hemodynamic instability, sepsis, coagulopathy, or during the first trimester of pregnancy.

Once ventilated, discontinuing ChEIs is safe and recommended. This eliminates the possibility of cholinergic overdose and permits determination of disease severity. After addressing the precipitating factors causing crisis, add ChEIs in low doses and titrate to the optimal dose. When respiratory strength improves, begin the weaning from the respirator for 2 or 3 minutes at a time, and increase as tolerated. Consider extubation when the patient has a NIF greater than −20 cm H2O and an expiratory pressure greater than 35 to 40 cm H2O. The tidal volume should exceed 5 mL/kg; this usually corresponds to a vital capacity of at least 1000 mL. If the patient complains of fatigue or shortness of breath, defer extubation even if these values and blood gas measurements are normal.

Prevention and aggressive treatment of medical complications offer the best opportunity to improve the outcome of myasthenic crisis.

Ocular Myasthenia Gravis

Treatment of OMG requires an accurate assessment of the patient’s functional impairment and its effects on daily life. ChEIs may control symptoms adequately in some patients, but the benefit is often partial and not long lived, whereas prednisone is often quite effective. The decision to initiate steroid therapy will depend upon the risk/benefit assessment, which is significantly different in patients considering treatment for purely cosmetic reasons versus those in whom diplopia has a profound bearing on their livelihood (pilots, surgeons, etc.). Existing evidence suggests that prednisone treatment may delay or reduce the frequency of progression of OMG to generalized disease (Kupersmith et al., 2003). Start prednisone at an initial dose of 10 to 20 mg/day, with gradual increases every 3 to 5 days until achieving a clinical response. Alternatively, begin treatment at a dose of 30 to 60 mg, since the risk of steroid-associated exacerbation is less in OMG. In OMG, use a maintenance dosage of corticosteroids that does not significantly suppress the immune system and causes few major systemic adverse effects. Consider a steroid-sparing agent if this is not the case. In general, OMG is not an indication for thymectomy, but this may be effective in some patients.

Childhood Myasthenia Gravis

The onset of immune-mediated MG before age 18 is referred to as juvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG) (Andrews and Sanders, 2002). Some 20% of JMG and almost 50% of those with onset before puberty are seronegative; the distinction from a congenital myasthenic syndrome is most challenging in the latter group (see Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes, later in this chapter). Electrodiagnostic studies identify a defect in NMT but have distinguishing features in only a few forms of congenital MG. A beneficial response to PLEX exchange or IVIG may help to establish the diagnosis of autoimmune MG. Many children who are initially seronegative later develop AChR antibodies. Thymomas are rare in this age group.

Treatment decisions in children with autoimmune MG are more difficult because the rate of spontaneous remission is high. We recommend ChEIs alone in prepubertal children not disabled by weakness. For patients who remain symptomatic despite optimal dosing of ChEIs, prednisone is efficacious and cost-effective, although the chronic side effects potentially have a long-term impact in children (growth stunting, weight gain, mood alteration, hyperglycemia, hypertension, etc.). A suggested starting dose is 0.5 mg/kg/day, with a maximum starting dose in older children of 30 mg/day. Use steroid-sparing immunosuppressive drugs in more severe or refractory cases, as in adult MG. PLEX and IVIG are effective short-term therapies in JMG. Thymectomy has reported favorable results in JMG, even in patients younger than 5 years of age, although the high rates of spontaneous remission in JMG make the assessment of benefit difficult. No reported adverse effects on the immune system by removing the thymus at this early age exist.

Pregnancy

Myasthenia may improve, worsen, or remain unchanged during pregnancy. It is common for the first symptoms of MG to begin during pregnancy or postpartum. First-trimester worsening is more common in first pregnancies, whereas third-trimester worsening and postpartum exacerbations are more common in subsequent pregnancies. Complete remission may occur late in pregnancy. The clinical status at onset of pregnancy does not reliably predict the course during pregnancy. Pregnancy is more difficult to manage at the beginning of MG, and women with MG should delay pregnancy until after the disease is stable.

Therapeutic abortion is rarely if ever needed because of MG, and the frequency of spontaneous abortion is not increased. Oral ChEIs are the first-line treatment during pregnancy. Intravenous ChEIs may produce uterine contractions and are contraindicated. Prednisone is the immunosuppressive agent of choice. We do not use immunosuppressive drugs during pregnancy because of theoretical potential mutagenic effects, although others feel that AZA and even CYA can be used safely during pregnancy (Ferrero et al., 2005). Increased risk of fetal malformation has been reported when men used AZA prior to conception (Norgard et al., 2004). MMF can cause birth defects and is contraindicated during pregnancy. PLEX or IVIG are useful when requiring an immediate (albeit temporary) improvement during pregnancy, but avoid PLEX during the first trimester.

Magnesium sulfate has neuromuscular blocking effects and is not recommended to manage preeclampsia. Barbiturates usually provide adequate treatment. Labor and delivery are usually normal. Cesarean section is useful only for obstetrical indications. Regional anesthesia is preferred for delivery or cesarean section. MG does not affect uterine smooth muscle and therefore does not compromise the first stage of labor. In the second stage, voluntary muscles are at risk for easy fatigue, and outlet forceps or vacuum extraction may be necessary. In our experience, breastfeeding is not a problem for myasthenic mothers, despite the theoretical risk of passing maternal AChR antibodies in breast milk to the newborn.

Transient Neonatal Myasthenia Gravis

A temporary form of MG affects 10% to 20% of newborns whose mothers have immune-mediated MG. The severity of symptoms in the newborn does not correlate with the severity of symptoms in the mother. The maternal antibody level correlates with the frequency and severity of transient neonatal myasthenia gravis (TNMG), and TNMG occurs only rarely in infants of seronegative mothers. Weakness may manifest in utero, particularly when maternal antibodies are directed against the fetal AChR, and may lead to arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (Barnes et al., 1995). Consider decreased fetal movement as a possible indication for PLEX or IVIG. Birth of a child with arthrogryposis should also prompt a search for MG in the mother. An affected mother who delivers an infant with TNMG is likely to have similarly affected subsequent infants. Consider prophylactic treatment with PLEX and/or steroids in a woman with a previously affected child, as the risk of recurrent TNMG is high.

Affected newborns are typically hypotonic and feed poorly during the first 3 days. In some newborns, symptoms may delay for 1 or 2 days. Symptoms usually last less than 2 weeks but may continue for as long as 12 weeks, which correlates with the half-life of neonatal antibodies. It is not clear why some newborns develop weakness and others with equally high antibody concentrations do not. Some mothers with antibodies directed specifically against fetal AChR might themselves be asymptomatic, which makes diagnosis of TNMG more difficult.

Examine all infants born of myasthenic mothers carefully at birth. Detection of AChR antibodies in the child provides strong evidence for the diagnosis, although seronegative mothers have delivered affected seronegative infants. Improvement following injection of 0.1 mg/kg of edrophonium supports the diagnosis of TNMG, but it may be hard to assess the response to edrophonium in an intubated and ventilated neonate. Improvement after edrophonium does not distinguish TNMG from some congenital myasthenic syndromes. A decremental response to RNS confirms abnormal NMT but also does not distinguish TNMG from many congenital myasthenic syndromes.

Affected newborns require symptomatic treatment with ChEIs if swallowing or breathing is impaired. Consider exchange transfusion if respiratory weakness is severe.

Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes

The congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) are a group of neuromuscular junction diseases caused by genetic defects of muscle end-plate molecules involved in NMT (Engel, 2008). They are individually and collectively rare but are of interest because they produce novel insights into the understanding of NMJ physiology. Symptoms are present at birth in most forms but may go unrecognized until adolescence or adulthood, particularly when progression is gradual and clinical expression is mild. Appropriate diagnosis is important, since many of the syndromes are treatable with drugs that increase the availability of ACh at the muscle end-plate or alter the kinetics of the AChR.

Autosomal recessive inheritance accounts for all genetic forms of myasthenia except for the slow-channel syndrome, which has autosomal dominant inheritance. Suggesting the diagnosis of CMS are the clinical features and the response to ChEIs or findings on standard electrodiagnostic studies. However, determination of the specific genetic or physiological defect requires genetic studies or specialized morphological and electrophysiological studies on muscle tissue.

Overall, there is a 2 : 1 male predominance. Ophthalmoparesis and ptosis are present in most cases during infancy; mild facial paresis may be present as well. Ophthalmoplegia is often incomplete at onset but progresses to complete paralysis during infancy or childhood. Some children develop generalized fatigue and weakness, but limb weakness is usually mild compared to ophthalmoplegia. Skeletal deformities like high-arched palate, facial dysmorphism, arthrogryposis, and scoliosis are common. Muscles may be small and underdeveloped. Episodic respiratory crises may occur with any form of congenital myasthenia but are particularly common in choline acetylcholinesterase deficiency (see later discussion).

ChEIs, sometimes in very high doses, improve limb muscle weakness in some forms of CMS but may worsen it in others. The weakness in some children responds to 3,4-diaminopyridine (3,4-DAP) (Harper and Engel, 2000). Thymectomy and immunosuppression are not effective.

Choline Acetyl Transferase Deficiency

This condition, previously called congenital myasthenic syndrome with episodic apnea or familial infantile myasthenia, is caused by mutations in the CHAT gene, which codes for end-plate choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), the rate-limiting enzyme in the resynthesis of acetylcholine within the nerve terminal. Generalized hypotonia, ptosis, and feeding difficulties are present at birth, and the early course of the disease is punctuated by sudden episodes of severe bulbar and generalized weakness with life-threatening apnea triggered by infections or stress. Arthrogryposis may be present. Within weeks after birth, the child becomes stronger and ultimately breathes unassisted. However, episodes of life-threatening apnea occur repeatedly throughout infancy and childhood, even into adult life, and there may be a history of sudden infant death syndrome in siblings.

A decremental response to RNS is usually present in weak muscles. The decrement may repair with brief exercise but becomes more marked with prolonged exercise or continuous repetitive stimulation at 3 Hz for 3 to 5 minutes. Jitter also becomes progressively worse during continuous nerve stimulation (Stålberg et al., 2010). ChEIs improve strength in most children with ChAT deficiency. Symptoms tend to lessen in adolescence and adulthood, when the disease resembles mild autoimmune myasthenia gravis or a congenital myopathy. We have seen sustained symptomatic improvement in children from several families with this syndrome when 3,4-DAP is given with pyridostigmine.

DOK-7 Mutations

DOK-7 is a muscle protein that activates MuSK and is critical in end-plate development and AChR aggregation. Some CMS patients with this mutation were previously characterized as having “limb-girdle myasthenia,” but the clinical manifestations of CMS associated with DOK-7 mutations may also be indistinguishable from patients with AChR deficiency (Selcen et al., 2008), including reduced fetal movements in utero and static and fatigable weakness of cranial, respiratory, and limb muscles. The electrodiagnostic findings are also indistinguishable from patients with congenital AChR deficiency. Response to ChEIs is variable, with some patients improving but many demonstrating no response. Ephedrine and 3,4-DAP may produce modest benefit.

Congenital Acetylcholinesterase Deficiency

End-plate acetylcholinesterase (AChE) deficiency results from a recessive mutation of COLQ, the gene coding for the collagenous tail of the heteromeric AChE molecule at the muscle end-plate (Ohno et al., 1999). Presentation is usually in infancy or early childhood. The symptoms are generalized weakness, ptosis, ophthalmoparesis, bulbar and limb weakness, underdevelopment of muscles, slowed pupillary responses to light, and either no response or clinical worsening with ChEIs. Skeletal deformities include lordosis or scoliosis that worsens with prolonged standing. Nerve conduction studies reveal one or more repetitive compound muscle action potentials with single stimuli. No effective treatment has been described. ChEIs do not help and may make symptoms worse.

Lambert-Eaton Syndrome

LES results from an immune-mediated attack against the P/Q-type voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC) on presynaptic cholinergic nerve terminals at the neuromuscular junction and in autonomic ganglia (Fig. 78.6). LES, first described in patients with lung cancer (CA-LES), also occurs as an organ-specific autoimmune disorder in the absence of cancer (NCA-LES).

LES is usually clinically quite distinct from MG. Most patients report gradual onset of lower-extremity weakness, sometimes with muscle tenderness. Dry mouth is a common symptom of autonomic dysfunction; other features are erectile dysfunction, postural hypotension, constipation, and dry eyes. Ocular and bulbar symptoms are generally not prominent (O’Neill et al., 1988; Tim et al., 2000; Wirtz et al., 2002), but are reported in some patients in a pattern suggesting MG (Burns et al., 2003; Titulaer et al., 2008). Prolonged apnea and ventilator dependence may follow use of neuromuscular blocking agents for surgery (Anderson et al., 1953), but respiratory failure is otherwise uncommon in the absence of primary pulmonary disease (Barr et al, 1993; Smith and Wald, 1996).

Symptoms usually begin after age 40, but LES can occur in children. Males and females are equally affected. Approximately one-half the patients have an underlying malignancy—in 80% this is small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)—which may be discovered years before or years after the onset of symptoms.

Examination usually demonstrates less weakness than the symptoms suggest. Tendon reflexes are almost always absent or diminished. Strength (and tendon reflexes) may facilitate briefly after exercise and then weaken with sustained activity, but this is not a universal finding. The response to edrophonium is not as robust or consistent as in MG. The weakness in LES is not usually life threatening and more closely resembles cachexia, polymyositis, or a paraneoplastic neuromuscular disease.

Diagnostic Procedures in Lambert-Eaton Syndrome

Confirmation of the diagnosis is by the following characteristic electrodiagnostic findings (see Chapter 32B): CMAPs with low amplitude, which increases during 20- to 50-Hz stimulation and after brief maximum voluntary muscle activation. Low-frequency repetitive nerve stimulation produces a decrementing response in a hand or foot muscle in almost all patients, and almost all have small CMAPs in some distal muscle (Tim et al., 2000). The characteristic increase in CMAP size after activation is more prominent in distal muscles, but it may be necessary to examine several muscles to demonstrate this important finding.

Immunoprecipitation assays demonstrate VGCC antibodies in almost all patients with CA-LES and in more than 90% with NCA-LES (Harper and Lennon, 2002). Low titers of VGCC antibodies have also been reported in SLE and rheumatoid arthritis (Lang et al., 1993). Early in the disease, these antibodies may not be detectable. Repeat antibody testing may be useful.

In a recent report, antibodies to SOX1, a transcription factor involved in neural development, were found in 64% of CA-LES patients with SCLC and in none with NCA-LES (Sabater et al., 2008). Confirmation of the presence of SOX1 antibodies are a marker for an underlying cancer in LES patients.

Immunopathology of Lambert-Eaton Syndrome

Studies indicate that P/Q VGCC are the target of disease-causing antibodies in LES. The number of motor nerve terminal active zone particles representing the VGCC is reduced (Fig. 78.7) (Fukunaga et al., 1982). Similar changes occur in mice injected with IgG from LES patients. The mechanism is probably from cross-linking of the VGCC by antibodies that down-regulate VGCC expression by antigenic modulation.

P/Q VGCC antibodies are found in up to 90% of non–immune suppressed LES patients (Lennon et al., 1995). SCLC cells are of neuroectodermal origin and contain high concentrations of VGCC. In CA-LES, the neuroectodermal antigens expressed by SCLC cells mimic VGCC and induce production of VGCC antibodies as a paraneoplastic syndrome. In NCA-LES, as in other primary autoimmune disorders, the presumption is that altered self-tolerance induces production of VGCC antibodies as part of a more general immune-mediated state. VGCC antibody titers do not correlate with disease severity among individuals, but the antibody levels may fall as the disease improves in patients receiving immunosuppression.

Treatment of Lambert-Eaton Syndrome

Once the diagnosis of LES is established, an extensive search for underlying malignancy, especially SCLC, is mandatory. Chronic smokers should undergo bronchoscopy and/or positron emission tomography (PET) scan if chest-imaging studies are normal. The target of initial treatment is the underlying malignancy. Weakness may improve after effective cancer therapy, and some patients require no further treatment. Repeat the search for occult malignancy periodically, especially during the first 2 years after symptom onset. Determine the frequency of reevaluation by the patient’s cancer risk factors.

Tailor therapy to the individual, based on the severity of weakness, underlying disease, life expectancy, and response to previous treatment. Randomized controlled trials have shown that 3,4-DAP and IVIG improve muscle strength scores and CMAP amplitudes in patients with LES (Maddison and Newsom-Davis, 2005; McEvoy et al., 1989; Oh et al., 2009; Sanders et al., 2000; Wirtz et al., 2009). Other treatments such as PLEX, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressive agents, including rituximab (Maddison et al., 2010), may be of benefit in some patients but have not been tested in controlled trials.

The following treatment plan for LES is a general guide that should be modified to suit specific situations.

ChEIs improve strength in occasional LES patients. Try pyridostigmine, 30 to 60 mg, every 6 hours for several days. In some patients, the major benefit is relief of dry mouth. Guanidine hydrochloride improves strength in many LES patients, but severe toxicity limits its use. Divide the initial oral dose of 5 to 10 mg/kg daily into 3 doses, 4 to 6 hours apart, and increase as needed to a maximum of 30 mg/kg/day. Bone marrow depression is a major risk and may occur with doses as low as 500 mg/day. Do not increase the dose more often than every 3 days; the maximum response may not occur for 2 to 3 days. Concomitant use of pyridostigmine, 30 to 60 mg, every 4 to 6 hours, enhances the therapeutic response to guanidine. Other side effects include renal tubular acidosis, chronic interstitial nephritis, cardiac arrhythmia, hepatic toxicity, pancreatic dysfunction, paresthesias, ataxia, confusion, and alterations of mood. Patients receiving guanidine require monthly blood tests.

Administering 3,4-DAP facilitates release of ACh from motor nerve terminals and produces clinically significant improvement of strength and autonomic symptoms in most LES patients (Tim et al., 2000). Therapeutic responses occur with doses of 5 to 25 mg 3 to 4 times a day; seizures may occur at doses higher than 100 mg/day. Concomitant use of pyridostigmine, 30 to 60 mg, 3 or 4 times a day enhances the response to 3,4-DAP. Side effects usually are negligible. Transitory perioral and digital paresthesias occur with doses greater than 10 to 15 mg. Cramps and diarrhea may occur when 3,4-DAP is given with pyridostigmine and can be minimized by reducing the dose of pyridostigmine; 3,4-DAP is a safe and effective treatment for LES but is not available for general clinical use in the United States. It is available for individual patients upon submission of a Treatment-Use Investigational New Drug application by the administering physician. Information on the application process can be obtained from Jacobus Pharmaceutical Co., Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, Fax No. 609-799-1176.

Both PLEX and IVIG provide short-term improvement in some patients with LES (Tim et al., 2000), but the results are usually not as good as in MG. If these treatments are not effective, it must be determined if weakness is sufficiently severe to warrant immunotherapy with prednisone, AZA, CYA, or rituximab. In patients with severe weakness, use PLEX or IVIG first, and add prednisone and AZA after improvement begins. Maintaining improvement may require repeated courses of treatment.

In LES patients with cancer, the response to cancer therapy determines the prognosis. In patients without cancer, treatment with immunosuppression produces improvement in many patients, but most require substantial and continuing doses of immunosuppressive medications (Maddison et al., 2001).

Myasthenia Gravis/Lambert-Eaton Syndrome Overlap Syndrome

The clinical presentations of MG and LES are usually quite distinct (Wirtz et al., 2002), but in some patients the clinical and electrodiagnostic findings may be similar, and the correct diagnosis may not obvious. Features that favor MG include prominent ocular muscle weakness, limb weakness that predominates in the arms, and normal muscle stretch reflexes (Wirtz et al., 2002). Features that favor LES include weakness that predominates in the hip girdle muscles, hypoactive or absent reflexes, and autonomic symptoms, especially dry mouth.

Patients with various overlapping features of MG and LES appear in the literature. Two examples are (1) clinical features of MG but facilitation on manual muscle testing or EMG, typical of LES; and (2) clinical and EMG patterns typical of one condition initially that change to the other later, or EMG patterns typical of MG in one muscle and of LES in another. A few patients have been reported who appear to have a true MG/LES overlap syndrome, with antibodies to both the AChR and VGCC (Kanzato et al., 1999; Katz et al., 1998; Newsom-Davis et al., 1991; Oh and Sher, 2005), and we have seen one such case among 1200 patients with acquired MG and 102 with LEMS. The ultimate diagnosis in patients with mixed features of MG and LES may be moot because most treatments are the same for both conditions. Exceptions are that we do not search for cancer other than thymoma in MG, and thymectomy is never a treatment for LES.

Botulism

Botulism is caused by a toxin produced by the anaerobic bacterium, Clostridium botulinum, that blocks the release of ACh from the motor nerve terminal (Cherington, 2007). The result is a long-lasting severe muscle paralysis. Botulism usually follows ingestion of inadequately sterilized contaminated foods. Of eight types of botulinum toxins (A, B, Cα, Cβ, D, E, F, and G), types A and B are the cause of most cases of botulism in the United States. Transmission of type E is in seafood. All forms of the toxin block ACh release from the presynaptic motor nerve terminal and the parasympathetic and sympathetic nerve ganglia. The intracellular target is the SNARE proteins of the presynaptic membrane. Neuromuscular symptoms usually begin 12 to 36 hours after ingestion of contaminated food and are preceded by nausea and vomiting. Not all people who ingest the contaminated food become symptomatic.

Clinical botulism occurs in five forms: classic or food-borne, infantile, wound, hidden, and iatrogenic. The most common form in the United States is wound botulism, which occurs predominantly in drug abusers after SQ injection of heroin. Clostridium bacteria colonize the injection site and release toxin that produces local and patchy systemic weakness.

Clinical Features of Botulism

The major symptoms of botulism are blurred vision, dysphagia, and dysarthria. Pupillary responses to light are impaired, and reduction of tendon reflex responses is variable. Weakness progresses for several days and then reaches a plateau. Severe respiratory paralysis may occur rapidly. The blocking of ACh release in the autonomic system results in blurring of vision from extraocular ophthalmoparesis, pupillary abnormalities, dry mouth, postural hypotension, and urinary retention. The edrophonium test is positive in approximately a third of patients but does not distinguish botulism from other causes of neuromuscular blockade. Electrophysiological findings aid the diagnosis (see later discussion). Bioassay of the toxin is by injecting serum or stool from an affected patient intraperitoneally into mice; the test is positive if paralysis and death follows. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays are available to rapidly detect the bacteria.

Infantile botulism results from the growth of C. botulinum in the immature gastrointestinal tract and the elaboration of small quantities of toxin over a prolonged period (Jones, 2002). Honey is a vehicle commonly incriminated as carrying the spores of C. botulinum that produce infantile botulism. Symptoms of constipation, lethargy, poor suck, and weak cry usually begin at approximately 4 months of age. Examination reveals weakness of the limb and oropharyngeal muscles, poorly reactive pupils, and hypoactive tendon reflexes. Most patients require ventilatory support. Demonstrating botulinum toxin in the stool or isolation of C. botulinum from stool culture confirms the diagnosis of infant botulism.

Treatment of Botulism

Treatment consists of administration of bivalent (type A and B) or trivalent (A, B, and E) antitoxin. Antibiotic therapy is not effective, since the cause of symptoms (in all but infantile botulism) is the ingestion of toxin rather than organisms. In infantile botulism, IV human botulism immune globulin (BIG-IV) neutralizes the toxin for several days after illness onset, shortens the length and cost of the hospital stay, and reduces the severity of illness (Arnon et al., 2006). Otherwise, treatment is supportive. ChEIs are usually not beneficial; 3,4-DAP may improve strength but not respiratory function. With improvements in intensive care, the mortality rate has declined to about 20%. Depending on initial severity of illness, recovery may be quite prolonged, with many patients continuing to have symptoms a year or longer after the onset of illness.

Other Causes of Abnormal Neuromuscular Transmission

Envenomation by animal toxins is the most common cause of NMJ toxicity worldwide. Muscles of eye movement or the eyelids are most often involved, as well as the muscles of neck flexion and the pectoral and pelvic girdles. In more severe envenomations, bulbar and respiratory muscles are also involved. Cognition and sensation are intact, and muscle stretch reflexes are often preserved or only minimally diminished, particularly during the early phases of illness. Arthropod venoms that affect the NMJ include those of the funnel web and black widow spiders, which produce marked facilitation of neurotransmitter release by depolarizing the presynaptic nerve terminal and increasing calcium influx into the nerve terminal. Tick paralysis results from a neurotoxin that blocks AChR function postsynaptically.

Envenomation by snakebite occurs primarily from the Elapidae and Hydrophiidae species. Snake NMJ toxins act either presynaptically or postsynaptically. Presynaptic β-neurotoxins (β-bungarotoxin, notexin, and taipoxin) impair ACh release; often there is an initial augmentation of ACh release, followed by depletion of neurotransmitter. Presynaptic toxins tend to be more potent than those that act postsynaptically. Postsynaptic α-neurotoxins produce a curare-like, nondepolarizing neuromuscular block that is variably reversible. Most venoms contains both types of neurotoxins, although one type may predominate.

Marine neurotoxins affecting the NMJ are rare and come primarily from poisonous fish (stonustoxin), a few mollusks (conotoxins), and dinoflagellates. Most marine intoxications result from ingestion. With some marine toxins, there is an increase in the concentration of toxin through successive predatory transvection up the food chain.

Heavy-metal intoxication is a rare cause of neuromuscular toxicity. Ingestion of bread made from flour from grain contaminated with methylmercury fungicide produces weakness with characteristic decremental responses and partial reversal with ChEIs.

Organophosphates impair NMT by irreversibly inhibiting acetylcholinesterase, producing a depolarizing neuromuscular block.

A defect in NMT may be a cause of weakness in critically ill patients and is often due to administration of drugs such as antibiotics, antiarrhythmics, and nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (Gorson, 2005). Prolonged use of these agents may result in weakness due to persistent neuromuscular blockade even hours or days after discontinuation.

NMT may also be impaired in motor unit diseases that do not primarily affect the NMJ. For example, patients with ALS may have fluctuating weakness that responds to ChEIs, a decrementing response to RNS, and increased jitter and blocking on SFEMG. Reports of features attributable to abnormal NMT in syringomyelia, poliomyelitis, peripheral neuropathy, and inflammatory myopathy exist.

References

Anderson H.J., Churchill-Davidson H.C., et al. Bronchial neoplasm with myasthenia. Prolonged apnea after administration of succinylcholine. Lancet. 1953;ii:1291-1293.

Andrews P.I., Sanders D.B. Juvenile myasthenia gravis. In: Jones H.R., DeVivo D.C., Darras B.T. Neuromuscular Disorders of Infancy, Childhood, and Adolescence. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann; 2002:575-597.

Arnon S.S., Schechter R., Maslanka S.E., et al. Human botulism immune globulin for the treatment of infant botulism. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:462-471.

Barnes P.R.J., Kanabar D.J., Brueton L., et al. Recurrent congenital arthrogryposis leading to a diagnosis of myasthenia gravis in an initially asymptomatic mother. Neuromuscul Disord. 1995;5:59-65.

Barr C.W., Claussen G., Thomas D., et al. Primary respiratory failure as the presenting symptom in Lambert- Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 1993;16:712-715.

Bau V., Hanisch F., Hain B., et al. Ocular involvement in MuSK antibody-positive myasthenia gravis. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2006;223:81-83.

Burns T.M., Russell J.A., LaChance D.H., et al. Oculobulbar involvement is typical with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2003;53:270-273.

Caress J.B., Hunt C.H., Batish S.D. Anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis presenting with purely ocular findings. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1002-1003.

Cherington M. Botulism, Elsevier, Engel A.G., editor. Neuromuscular Junction Disorders. 2007.

Ciafaloni E., Nikhar N.K., Massey J.M., et al. Retrospective analysis of the use of cyclosporine in myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2000;55:448-450.

Conti-Fine B.M., Protti M.P., Belone M., et al. Myasthenia Gravis and Its Experimental Model: the Immunobiology of an Autoimmune Disease. Georgetown, TX: Landes Bioscience Publishers; 1997.

de Feo L.G., Schottlender J., Martelli N.A., et al. Use of intravenous pulsed cyclophosphamide in severe, generalized myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. 2002;26:31-36.

Donofrio P.D., Berger A., Brannagan T.H., et al. Consensus statement: the use of intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of neuromuscular conditions report of the AANEM ad hoc committee. Muscle Nerve. 2009;40:890-900.

Drachman D.B., Jones R.J., Brodsky R.A. Treatment of refractory myasthenia: “rebooting” the immune system with high-dose cyclophosphamide. Neurology. 2002;58(Suppl 3):A328-A329.

Engel A.G. Congenital myasthenic syndromes, Elsevier, Engel A.G., editor. Neuromuscular Junction Disorders. 2008:285-331.

Engel A.G., Lambert E.H., Howard F.M. Immune complexes (IgG and C3) at the motor endplate in myasthenia gravis: ultrastructural and light microscopic localization and electrophysiologic correlation. Mayo Clin Proc. 1977;52:267-280.

Engel A.G., Lindstrom J.M., Lambert E.H., et al. Ultrastructural localization of the acetylcholine receptor in myasthenia gravis and its experimental autoimmune model. Neurology. 1977;27:307-315.

Evoli A., Di Schino C., Marsili F., et al. Successful treatment of myasthenia gravis with tacrolimus. Muscle Nerve. 2002;25:111-114.

Ferrero S., Pretta S., Nicoletti A., et al. Myasthenia gravis: management issues during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;121:129-138.

Fukunaga H., Engel A.G., Osame M., et al. Paucity and disorganization of presynaptic membrane active zones in the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 1982;5:686-697.

Gorson K.C. Approach to neuromuscular disorders in the intensive care unit. Neurocrit Care. 2005;3:195-212.

Grob D., Brunner N.G., Namba T., et al. Lifetime course of myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. 2008;37:141-149.

Gronseth G.S., Barohn R.J. Practice parameter: thymectomy for autoimmune myasthenia gravis (an evidence-based review). Neurology. 2000;55:5-15.

Guptill J.T., Sanders D.B. Update on MuSK antibody positive myasthenia gravis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2010;23:530-535.

Harper C.M., Engel A.G. Treatment of 31 congenital myasthenic syndrome patients with 3,4-diaminopyridine. Neurology. 2000;54(Suppl 3):A395.

Harper C.M., Fukudome T., Engel A.G. Treatment of slow-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome with fluoxetine. Neurology. 2003;60:1710-1713.

Harper C.M., Lennon V.A. The Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. In: Kaminski H.J., editor. Current Clinical Neurology: Myasthenia Gravis and Related Disorders. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2002:269-291.

Hatanaka Y., Claussen G.C., Oh S.J. Anticholinesterase hypersensitivity or intolerance is common in MuSK antibody positive myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2005;64:A79.

Hehir M.K., Burns T.M., Alpers J.P., et al. Mycophenolate mofetil in AChR-antibody positive myasthenia gravis: outcomes in 102 patients. Muscle Nerve. 2010;41:593-598.

Hohlfeld R., Wekerle H. Reflections on the “intrathymic pathogenesis” of myasthenia gravis. J Neuroimmunol. 2008;201:21-27.

Ing E.B., Ing S.Y., Ing T., et al. The complication rate of edrophonium testing for suspected myasthenia gravis. Can J Ophthalmol. 2005;35:141-144.

Jaretzki A. Thymectomy for myasthenia gravis: analysis of controversies–patient management. Neurologist. 2003;9:77-92.

Jaretzki A., Barohn R.J., Ernstoff R.M., et al. Myasthenia gravis. Recommendations for clinical research standards. Neurology. 2000;55:16-23.

Jones H.R. Infantile botulism and other acquired neuromuscular junction disorders of infancy and childhood. In: Brown W.F., Bolton C.F., Aminoff M.J. Neuromuscular Function and Disease. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2002:1697-1702.

Kanzato N., Motomura M., Suehara M., et al. Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome with ophthalmoparesis and pseudoblepharospasm. Muscle Nerve. 1999;22:1727-1730.

Katz J.S., Wolfe G.I., Bryan W.W., et al. Acetylcholine receptor antibodies in the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Neurology. 1998;50:470-475.

Kuks J.B.M., Oosterhuis H.J.G.H. Clinical presentation and epidemiology of myasthenia gravis. In: Kaminski H.J., editor. Current Clinical Neurology: Myasthenia Gravis and Related disorders. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2004:93-113.

Kupersmith M.J., Latkany R., Homel P. Development of generalized disease at 2 years in patients with ocular myasthenia gravis. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:243-248.

Lang B., Johnston I., Leys K., et al. Autoantibody specificities in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1993;681:382-393.

Larner A.J. The place of the ice pack test in the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis. Int J Clin Pract. 2004;58:887-888.

Lauriola L., Ranelletti F., Maggiano N., et al. Thymus changes in anti-MuSK-positive and -negative myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2005;64:536-538.

Leite M.I., Jacob S., Viegas S., et al. IgG1 antibodies to acetylcholine receptors in “seronegative” myasthenia gravis. Brain. 2008;131:1940-1952.

Leite M.I., Strobel P., Jones M., et al. Fewer thymic changes in MuSK antibody-positive than in MuSK antibody-negative MG. Ann Neurol. 2005;57:444-448.

Lennon V.A., Kryzer T.J., Griesmann G.E., et al. Calcium-channel antibodies in the Lambert-Eaton syndrome and other paraneoplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1467-1474.

Levin N., Abramsky O., Lossos A., et al. Extrathymic malignancies in patients with myasthenia gravis. J Neurol Sci. 2005;237:39-43.

Maddison P., Lang B., Mills K., et al. Long-term outcome in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome without lung cancer. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70:212-217.

Maddison P., McConville J., Farrugia M.E., et al. The use of rituximab in myasthenia gravis and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;82:671-673.

Maddison, P., Newsom-Davis, J., 2005. Treatment for Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003279.

McEvoy K.M., Windebank A.J., Daube J.R., et al. 3,4-Diaminopyridine in the treatment of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1567-1571.

Meriggioli M.N., Rowin J., Richman J.G., et al. Mycophenolate mofetil for myasthenia gravis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2003;998:494-499.

Meriggioli M.N., Sanders D.B. Myasthenia gravis: diagnosis. Semin Neurol. 2004;24:31-39.

Meriggioli M.N., Sanders D.B. Autoimmune myasthenia gravis: emerging clinical and biological heterogeneity. Lancet Neurology. 2009;8:475-490.

Murthy J.M.K., Meena A.K., Chowdary C.V.S., et al. Myasthenic crisis: clinical features, complications and mortality. Neurol India. 2005;53:37-40.

Nadeau J.A., Bhibhatbhan A., McDougall D., et al. Identification and comparison of adverse events for preparations of IVIG in patients with neuromuscular disorders. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010;112:467-469.

Nagane Y., Utsugisawa K., Obara D., et al. Efficacy of low-dose FK506 in the treatment of myasthenia gravis–a randomized pilot study. Eur Neurol. 2005;53:146-150.

Newsom-Davis J., Cutter G., Wolfe G.I., et al. Status of the thymectomy trial for nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis patients receiving prednisone. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1132:344-347.

Newsom-Davis J., Leys K., Vincent A., et al. Immunological evidence for the co-existence of the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome and myasthenia gravis in two patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991;54:452-453.

Niks E.H., Kuks J.B.M., Roep B.O., et al. Strong association of MuSK antibody-positive myasthenia gravis and HLA-DR14-DQ5. Neurology. 2006;66:1772-1774.

Norgard B., Pedersen L., Jacobsen J., et al. The risk of congenital abnormalities in children fathered by men treated with azathioprine or mercaptopurine before conception. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;19:679-685.

O’Neill J.H., Murray N.M., Newsom-Davis J. The Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. A review of 50 cases. Brain. 1988;111:577-596.

Oh S.J., Claussen G.G., Hatanaka Y., et al. 3,4-Diaminopyridine is more effective than placebo in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over drug study in LEMS. Muscle Nerve. 2009;40:795-800.

Oh S.J., Sher E. MG and LEMS overlap syndrome: case report with electrophysiological and immunological evidence. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116:1167-1171.

Ohno K., Brengman J.M., Felice K.J., et al. Congenital end-plate acetylcholinesterase deficiency caused by a nonsense mutation and an A–>G splice-donor-site mutation at position +3 of the collagenlike-tail-subunit gene (COLQ): how does G at position +3 result in aberrant splicing? Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:635-644.

Padua L., Aprile I., Lo Monaco M., et al. Neurophysiological assessment in the diagnosis of botulism: usefulness of single-fiber EMG. Muscle Nerve. 1999;22:1388-1392.

Pascuzzi R.M. The edrophonium test. Semin Neurol. 2003;23:83-88.

Pascuzzi R.M., Coslett B., Johns T.R. Long-term corticosteroid treatment of myasthenia gravis: report of 116 patients. Ann Neurol. 1984;15:291-298.

Phillips L.H. The epidemiology of myasthenia gravis. Semin Neurol. 2004;24:17-20.

Ponseti J.M., Azem Z., Fort J.M., et al. Long-term results of tacrolimus in cyclosporine- and prednisone-dependent myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2005;64:1641-1643.

Pringle C.E., Atkins H.L. Stem cell transplant results in sustained remission of generalized myasthenia gravis. J Neurol Sci. 2005;238:S95-S96.

Qureshi A.I., Choudhry M.A., Akbar M.S., et al. Plasma exchange versus intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in myasthenic crisis. Neurology. 1999;52:629-632.

Rabinstein A., Wijdicks E.F.M. BiPAP in acute respiratory failure due to myasthenic crisis may prevent intubation. Neurology. 2002;59:1647-1649.

Romi F., Skeie G.O., Gilhus N.E., et al. Striational antibodies in myasthenia gravis–reactivity and possible clinical significance. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:442-446.

Sabater L., Titulaer M., Saiz A., et al. SOX1 antibodies are markers of paraneoplastic Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Neurology. 2008;70:924-928.

Sanders D.B., El Salem K., Massey J.M., et al. Clinical aspects of MuSK antibody positive seronegative MG. Neurology. 2003;60:1978-1980.

Sanders D.B., Evoli A. Immunosuppressive therapies in myasthenia gravis. Autoimmunity. 2010;43:428-435.

Sanders D.B., Massey J.M. Clinical features of myasthenia gravis, Elsevier, Engel A.G., editor. Neuromuscular Junction Disorders. 2008:229-252.

Sanders D.B., Massey J.M., Sanders L.L., et al. A randomized trial of 3,4-diaminopyridine in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Neurology. 2000;54:603-607.

Sanders D.B., McDermott M., Thornton C., et al. A trial of mycophenolate mofetil with prednisone as initial immunotherapy in myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2008;71:394-399.

Sanders D.B., Siddiqi Z.A. Lessons from two trials of mycophenolate mofetil in myasthenia gravis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1132:249-253.

Selcen D., Milone M., Shen X.M., et al. Dok-7 myasthenia: phenotypic and molecular genetic studies in 16 patients. Ann Neurol. 2008;64:71-87.

Smith A.G., Wald J. Acute ventilatory failure in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome and its response to 3,4-diaminopyridine. Neurology. 1996;46:1143-1145.

Soltys J., Kusner L.L., Young A., et al. Novel complement inhibitor limits severity of experimentally myasthenia gravis. Ann Neurol. 2009;65:67-75.

Stålberg E.V., Sanders D.B. Jitter recordings with concentric needle electrodes. Muscle Nerve. 2009;40:331-339.

Stålberg E.V., Trontelj J.V., Sanders D.B. Myasthenia gravis and other disorders of neuromuscular transmission. In: Single Fiber EMG. Fiskebåckskil, Sweden: Edshagen Publishing House; 2010:218-266.

Stickler D.E., Massey J.M., Sanders D.B. MuSK-antibody positive myasthenia gravis: clinical and electrodiagnostic patterns. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116:2065-2068.

Sussman J.D., Argov Z., McKee D., et al. Antisense treatment for myasthenia gravis. Experience with Monarsen. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1132:283-290.

The Muscle Study Group. A trial of mycophenolate mofetil with prednisone as initial immunotherapy in myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2008;71:394-399.

Tim R.W., Massey J.M., Sanders D.B. Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Electrodiagnostic findings and response to treatment. Neurology. 2000;54:2176-2178.

Titulaer M.J., Wirtz P.W., Wintzen A.R., et al. Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome with pure ocular weakness. Neurology. 2008;70:86-87.

Tuzun E., Meriggioli M.N., Rowin J., et al. Myasthenia gravis patients with low plasma IL-6 and IFN-[gamma] benefit from etanercept treatment. J Autoimmun. 2005;24:261-268.

Vernino S., Lennon V.A. Autoantibody profiles and neurological correlations of thymoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:7270-7275.

Vincent A., Lang B. The prevalence of MuSK antibody positive myasthenia gravis worldwide. J Neuroimmunol. 2006;178:233.

Wirtz P.W., Sotodeh M., Nijnuis M., et al. Difference in distribution of muscle weakness between myasthenia gravis and the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:766-768.

Wirtz P.W., Verschuuren J.J., van Kijk J.G., et al. Efficacy of 3,4-diaminopyridine and pyridostigmine in the treatment of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;86:44-48.

Zang X., Yang M., Xu J., et al. Clinical and serological study of myasthenia gravis in HuBei Province, China. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:386-390.

Zinman L., Ng E., Bril V. IV immunoglobulin in patients with myasthenia gravis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2007;68:837-841.