Cutaneous Melanoma

Published on 05/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Dermatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 5371 times

93

Cutaneous Melanoma

A malignant tumor of melanocytes, most commonly arising from cutaneous melanocytes; can also develop from melanocytes residing elsewhere – e.g. in the uveal tract, retinal pigment epithelium, gastrointestinal mucosa, or leptomeninges.

Some cutaneous melanomas (CMs) arise de novo, whereas others arise within precursor lesions (e.g. melanocytic nevi; see Chapter 92).

Tremendous advances have been made in understanding the molecular pathways and mutations from which many CMs originate, resulting in identification of genetic markers, tools for aiding in the histologic diagnosis, and targeted treatments for CM (Figs. 93.1 and 93.2; see Table 93.11).

Epidemiology

There has been a marked increase in the incidence of CM during the past 40–50 years, with a modest increase in mortality, especially among older males (Figs. 93.3 and 93.4).

Death occurs at a younger age than for most other cancers.

Risk factors are divided into three major groups: genetic, environmental, and phenotypic (Table 93.1).

Familial atypical multiple mole melanoma (FAMMM) syndrome is defined as families with atypical (dysplastic) nevi and ≥2 blood relatives with melanoma; carries up to an 85% risk of developing CM by age 50 years in affected family members; some families with CDKN2A mutations have both melanoma and pancreatic cancer.

Primary prevention: sun protective measures and avoidance of tanning beds.

Secondary prevention: early detection.

Clinical

The clinical presentation of CM varies greatly; although the ABCDE‘s (Asymmetry, Border irregularity, Color variegation, Diameter >6 mm, Evolution) are often used in public awareness campaigns to help promote the clinical recognition of CM, they have their shortcomings; to rectify this, the EFG rule (Elevated, Firm, Growing) has been added for nodular and amelanotic CMs.

As banal nevi age, they also become more elevated, but in contrast to nodular CMs, they are soft to palpation.

There are four major subtypes of primary invasive CM, based on clinicopathologic features:

Superficial spreading melanoma (SSM; ~60% of melanomas) (Fig. 93.5).

Nodular melanoma (NM; ~20%) (Fig. 93.6).

Lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM; ~9%) (Fig. 93.7).

Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM; ~4%) (Fig. 93.8).

In cutaneous melanoma in situ (MIS), the malignancy is confined to the epidermis and/or the hair follicle epithelium (Fig. 93.9); all types of CM (except for NM) can have an in situ phase; lentigo maligna is a type of MIS that arises within chronically sun-damaged skin and can remain in situ for years to decades.

Less common variants of CM:

Amelanotic melanoma: color ranges from pink to red and any type of CM may be amelanotic (Fig. 93.10); children can develop amelanotic nodular CM, and the lesion may resemble a persistent arthropod bite or pyogenic granuloma.

Nail matrix melanoma: see Table 58.3 and Fig. 93.11.

Mucosal melanoma: mouth (e.g. palate, gingiva), anus > nasopharynx, larynx, vagina; ~35% are amelanotic.

Desmoplastic and neurotropic melanomas: skin-colored or pink > brown to black, firm nodule, usually in sun-exposed sites; may arise de novo or within a lentigo maligna; a deeper biopsy is necessary for diagnosis; local recurrence is a common problem.

Childhood CM is rare; prepubertal patients tend to have thicker lesions that can be difficult to distinguish from atypical Spitz nevi histologically, and overall the prognosis is favorable.

Controlling for Breslow depth (in sites where the Breslow depth can be measured), all CMs have the same prognosis, including pregnancy-associated CM; however, some types of CM tend to have a deeper Breslow depth due to delayed diagnosis (e.g. amelanotic, ALM).

Diagnosis

Early detection is key to improved survival; diagnosis is based on clinical suspicion, followed by histologic confirmation.

The biopsy should attempt to remove the entire lesion, including a depth adequate to determine an accurate Breslow depth (Fig. 93.12); if limited by large size, representative samples should be obtained; evaluation is then performed by a dermatopathologist.

When doing a total body skin examination (TBSE), signs such as the ‘ugly duckling sign’ (a pigmented lesion that stands out as atypical within the context of surrounding nevi; see Fig. 93.9C and Chapter 92) and the ‘little red riding hood sign’ can prove useful (see Fig. 93.9A).

Photography and dermoscopy can aid in diagnosis (Figs. 93.13 and 93.14); for the latter, the first step is to determine if the lesion is melanocytic (Table 93.2) and then assess for worrisome features (Tables 93.3 and 93.4).

DDx: outlined in Table 93.5.

Prognosis and Staging

Of the histologic features of a primary invasive CM, the Breslow depth (in millimeters) is the strongest predictor of survival (see Fig. 93.12); the presence or absence of lymph node involvement is an even stronger predictor of survival.

The American Joint Committee on Cancer’s (AJCC) TNM classification and staging system for CM are outlined in Tables 93.6 and 93.7.

As with other cancers, prognosis is dependent on the stage at the time of diagnosis (Fig. 93.15); other independent prognostic factors for survival have also been identified (Table 93.8).

Management

Once the histologic diagnosis of CM is confirmed, evaluation includes TBSE and palpation of the surrounding skin and lymph node basins prior to re-excision (Table 93.9).

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB):

SLNB is useful as a diagnostic and prognostic tool, but to date its usefulness as a therapeutic modality has not been established.

Indications for consideration of SLNB: CM with T ≥1 mm and no clinically involved regional lymph nodes or distant metastases; selected patients with T <1 mm but with ulceration and/or mitoses ≥1/mm2.

Typically performed at the time of re-excision (Fig. 93.16).

Currently, if SLNB reveals micrometastases, then a complete lymph node dissection is performed; there are ongoing trials to determine if this is necessary.

Advantages: provides additional diagnostic and staging information; allows for entry into clinical trials.

Disadvantages: can cause lymphedema; expensive; usually requires general anesthesia.

Imaging studies for identification of metastases include: ultrasound of lymph node basins; CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis or PET scan in high-risk patients; and if symptoms, cranial MRI; serum LDH is measured serially as it influences prognosis (see Table 93.7).

Additional Rx is outlined in Tables 93.10 and 93.11.

A melanoma patient worksheet can help organize all of this information for both the patient and the clinician (see Appendix).

Follow-Up

Primary objectives include identification of potentially curable local recurrences (~4% of patients; Fig. 93.17) or regional metastases (e.g. in transit, lymph node; Fig. 93.18) and to identify second primary CMs (up to 5% of patients).

In addition to TBSE and lymph node examination, visits should include a review of systems that focuses on signs or symptoms of metastases to soft tissue, liver, lung, the gastrointestinal tract, and CNS.

Follow-up intervals during the first 3–5 years after diagnosis vary from 3 to 6 months, depending on stage, in addition to the number of primary melanomas, melanocytic nevi, and atypical nevi as well as family history of melanoma; lifelong follow-up is recommended.

Patients should be counseled to adhere to sun protective measures; perform skin self-examinations at home; stay up-to-date on their other health maintenance and recommended cancer screenings; and take an oral vitamin D supplement if needed.

Family members can be screened by a dermatologist, who can then determine frequency of subsequent screenings.

Although up to 10% of patients with CM have familial melanoma, mutations have been detected in a limited number of high-penetrance genes (e.g. CDKN2A >> CDK4); when a patient with CM has multiple primaries, ≥2 family members with CM, and/or a family history of pancreatic cancer, consideration of genetic counseling should be discussed.

For further information see Ch. 113. From Dermatology, Third Edition.