CHAPTER 395 Classification of Spinal Arteriovenous Lesions
Arteriovenous Fistulas and Arteriovenous Malformations
Spinal arteriovenous lesions are a collection of disparate and diverse entities, and our understanding of their pathophysiology has evolved significantly over the past century. Recently, significant microsurgical and endovascular advances have been made in the treatment of spinal arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). To select an effective treatment strategy, surgeons must first characterize a lesion accurately. In this chapter we propose a classification system derived from the senior author’s (R.F.S.) experience1 that is based on specific anatomic and pathophysiologic characteristics of the lesions. The lesions are divided into arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and AVMs (Table 395-1).2–11 AVFs are subdivided anatomically into extradural and intradural. Intradural AVFs are further divided into dorsal and ventral types according to their location. Based on size and the number of feeding branches, ventral dural AVFs are further divided into types A, B, and C. AVMs include extradural-intradural, intramedullary, and conus lesions.
Historical Perspective and Previous Classifications
Spinal AVMs were first described by Gaupp in 1888.12 Twenty-three years later, Krause described the first surgically treated spinal dural fistula.13 In 1931, 5 years after its original clinical description, Foix-Alajouanine syndrome (subacute necrotic myelopathy) was linked to acute thrombosis of pathologic spinal AVM vessels.14–16
In 1943, Wyburn-Mason analyzed 110 patients with spinal AVMs.2 In his classic monograph, he recognized two main types of spinal vascular lesions: venous angioma (angioma racemosum venosum) and arteriovenous angioma (angioma racemosum arteriovenosum). The venous type consisted of a mass of turgid pial veins, usually located in the posterior aspect and below the midthoracic portion of the spinal cord. He described it microscopically as thick-walled pial vessels with marked “proliferation of intramedullary capillaries, precapillaries and venules.” The arteriovenous type was described as a fistulous capillary bed, most commonly found in the cervical or lumbar enlargement and often recognized early in life. Microscopically, there were many vessels of different size and structures, some resembling arteries and others veins.2
As spinal angiographic techniques have improved,4,5,17–19 authors have moved from descriptive pathologic analysis toward anatomically based classifications for spinal AVMs. Di Chiro and other investigators proposed the most common recent classification scheme in which spinal AVMs were divided into three types.4,5–8 Type I lesions are dural AVFs in which a dural branch from a radicular artery forms an abnormal communication with the dural veins at the nerve root sleeve. Type II lesions are glomus or intramedullary lesions. Type III lesions are juvenile or metameric AVMs associated with both extradural and intradural extension of the spinal AVM. Subsequently, Djindian and associates proposed a new category of ventral perimedullary fistula supplied by the anterior spinal artery (ASA).7 Heros and colleagues further characterized this type of lesion as a type IV spinal AVM.6
Borden and coworkers described a three-point anatomic classification of spinal dural AVFs and used the term dural arteriovenous fistulous malformation (AVFM).9 Type I AVFMs involve Batson’s epidural venous plexus. Type II lesions drain into both the epidural and perimedullary venous plexus. Type III AVFMs are supplied by meningeal branches of a radicular artery, which drain into the coronal venous plexus.4
Niimi and Berenstein divided vascular lesions of the spine into spinal vascular lesions and spinal cord vascular lesions.10 They subdivided spinal vascular lesions into dural and extradural fistulas. Spinal cord vascular lesions were referred to as spinal cord vascular malformations, of which there are two types: isolated, which includes AVMs and AVFs, and multiple, which includes metameric and nonmetameric forms.
Bao and Ling classified spinal cord vascular lesions as intramedullary AVMs, intradural AVFs, dural AVFs, paravertebral AVMs, and Cobb’s syndrome.11 Intramedullary lesions include glomus and juvenile forms. Based on their size and degree of blood flow, intradural AVFs were subdivided into types I, II, and III. Paravertebral AVMs involve the paravertebral muscles and the paravertebral and epidural space. Cobb’s syndrome involves multiple structures within the same metamere.
Rosenblum and coworkers described two major types of spinal AVMs in 81 patients based on the location of the vascular nidus: dural versus intradural.3 Intradural AVMs were divided into intramedullary and dural AVFs. Intramedullary lesions were further subclassified into glomus (compact) and juvenile (diffuse) AVMs. Dural AVFs were supplied by a dural artery, with fistulous drainage into spinal veins, at least partially within the cord or pia. Intramedullary lesions were supplied by medullary arteries, and the arteriovenous shunt was located partially in the spinal cord or pia mater. Dural AVFs were supplied by a radicular branch along the dural nerve root sleeve that drained via an AVF into the coronal venous plexus. This classification system included no description of extradural-intradural or conus AVMs.
As detailed earlier, the previous nomenclature used to describe spinal vascular malformations was purely descriptive and based on incomplete understanding of the angioarchitecture and pathophysiology of these lesions. Our system reclassifies previously described entities according to the improved understanding of the anatomic location and pathophysiology of each lesion (see Table 395-1).20,21 Accurate characterization of these lesions allows correct diagnosis of them and optimization of treatment.
Finally, we believe that spinal vascular malformations are so complex that some lesions will defy any proposed classification system. As lesions that do not fit the current scheme are better defined, the classification system must be updated to include these malformations. For this reason, we added the separate category of conus medullaris AVMs. In his vast experience treating spinal vascular malformations, R.F.S. has encountered these lesions several times. Because their specific characteristics fit no existing category, a new one was created.1,22 By recognizing conus AVMs, our classification system is the first to include all currently recognized spinal vascular malformations and fistulas.
Proposed Classification System
Extradural Arteriovenous Fistulas
Extradural AVFs (Fig. 395-1) are extremely uncommon. They represent a direct connection between a branch of a radicular artery and the epidural venous plexus, which leads to the development of an extradural high-flow AVF. These fistulas are usually characterized by significant engorgement of the epidural venous complex, which leads to a mass effect on the nerve roots or the spinal cord, or on both. Venous congestion of the spinal cord can also cause myelopathic symptoms. In addition, shunting of large amounts of arterial blood into the venous system can steal blood flow from the spinal cord with resultant ischemia and worsening myelopathy.10,23–27
Intradural Dorsal Arteriovenous Fistulas
Intradural dorsal AVFs are the most common type of spinal AVF and usually occur in the thoracic region. Intradural dorsal AVFs (Fig. 395-2), which correlate with type I dural AVFs, are composed of a direct connection between a radicular feeding artery and the coronal venous plexus. A glomerular network of tiny branches of the radicular artery coalesces at the fistulous site, which is in the dural sleeve of the nerve root. Arterialization of the coronal venous plexus leads to myelopathic venous congestion and subsequent myelopathy.