Classification and pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases

Published on 19/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Pathology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3685 times

26

Classification and pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases

The neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by progressive dysfunction and death of neurons. The degeneration often affects specific systems, implying some form of selective neuronal vulnerability. Diseases with a known vascular, toxic, metabolic, infective, or autoimmune cause are by convention excluded from this group.

CLASSIFICATION

There are two main groups of neurodegenerative diseases: the movement disorders and the dementia syndromes (Table 26.1).

There is considerable overlap in the clinical and pathological features of these diseases. Apparently distinct clinical phenotypes are associated with several different types of pathologic abnormality. For example:

On the other hand, the same neurodegenerative disease process can have several clinical phenotypes. The region affected by disease determines the clinical manifestations. For example:

PATHOGENESIS

Most neurodegenerative diseases are of unknown cause, but recent work has provided some insights into the mechanisms of neurodegeneration. Many environmental factors, such as toxins and viruses, have in the past been considered as possible causes of neurodegenerative diseases (Table 26.2), but the search for such factors has been largely disappointing and none has been established as causative.

PROTEIN ACCUMULATION AND DEGRADATION

These are key features of several neurodegenerative diseases. The accumulations of abnormal proteins occur either intracellularly as inclusion bodies or extracellularly, usually as amyloid. Cellular inclusion bodies have long been recognized as characteristic of certain degenerative processes, and in many cases are required features for the histologic diagnosis of specific diseases. Important examples of such inclusions are:

Most inclusions were originally defined by special tinctorial staining techniques. Cellular and molecular biologic studies have characterized the constituent proteins of many inclusions and defined some of the steps involved in their biogenesis. Some of the intracellular inclusions of degenerative diseases are derived from cytoskeletal or cytoskeleton-related proteins, in many instances modified by abnormal patterns of phosphorylation and other post-translational processes. It is now becoming common for neurodegenerative diseases to be named according to the protein involved, for example synucleinopathy, tauopathy.

In certain diseases, mutations in the genes coding for specific proteins leads directly to their accumulation in inclusion bodies. Tau protein accumulates in neuronal and glial cells in a variety of neurodegenerative diseases, some of which are now recognized to be associated with mutations in the tau gene (MAPT), on chromosome 17. These insights have led to the collective designation of these conditions as tauopathies, some of which are familial and some sporadic. There are several isoforms of tau, formed by differential splicing. Of particular relevance in neurodegenerative disease is the difference between the forms of tau with three and those with four microtubule-binding domains. Alzheimer’s disease is the commonest condition characterized by tau protein accumulation but is not linked to MAPT mutations, and is hence an example of a sporadic tauopathy. Other sporadic conditions characterized by tau protein accumulation in neurons or glia include progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, and grain dementia. A subgroup of the frontotemporal lobar degenerations is linked to mutations in the tau gene, and certain haplotypes of the tau gene are associated with progressive supranuclear palsy.

Transactivation response DNA binding protein 43 (TDP43) is normally located in the nucleus of cells and acts as a transcriptional regulator. This protein has been found to be the main constituent of inclusion bodies in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease, and in some of the cases of frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

α-synuclein is a normal synaptic protein which has been recognized to be a major constituent of Lewy bodies in Parkinson’s disease and glial cytoplasmic inclusions in multiple system atrophy. In most cases, there is no mutation in the α-synuclein gene but this gene is mutated in rare familial forms of Parkinson’s disease. These conditions have been collectively termed synucleinopathies. There are also other, much rarer diseases associated with α-synuclein inclusion bodies (such as some forms of neuroaxonal dystrophy, and diffuse neurofibrillary tangles with calcification – a disease in which both tau and α-synuclein inclusions are present).

In diseases which are caused by triplet repeat expansions of CAG repeats, such as Huntington disease and some spinocerebellar degenerations, inclusions composed of polyglutamine, coded by a CAG repeat, develop within neuronal nuclei. These disorders have been referred to as the polyglutamine disorders.

The prion diseases (see Chapter 32) represent a biological phenomenon that is probably unique in which a protein-only transmissible agent is responsible for disease.

In many inclusion bodies, a common factor is accumulation of the protein ubiquitin, together with other proteins that are part of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), for example P62 (sequestosome 1). This system normally functions to eliminate short-lived or misfolded proteins. The present of UPS proteins in many different types of inclusion probably represents a cellular response aimed at the elimination of abnormal proteins. In some familial neurodegenerative diseases, mutations in genes coding for proteins involved in the UPS have been found, suggesting that inefficiencies in protein degradation can lead to neurodegeneration. Abnormalities in autophagic pathways and endosomal recycling may also contribute to the pathogenesis of this group of diseases.

A practical consequence of these insights is the increasing use of specific immunohistochemical techniques rather than empirical stains such as various types of silver impregnation to detect inclusions. Immunohistochemical detection of phosphorylated tau protein, α-synuclein, TDP43, P62 and ubiquitin are now routinely used to establish a histological diagnosis in many neurodegenerative diseases.

The accumulation of abnormal extracellular proteins in the form of amyloid is a characteristic feature of Alzheimer’s disease as well as prion diseases. The pathogenesis of the accumulation of amyloid is beginning to be uncovered. Amyloids are extracellular fibrillar proteins defined by their physicochemical characteristics, including:

These properties are due to the arrangement of the constituent peptides in an antiparallel β-pleated sheet, into which the Congo red dye intercalates in a precise and aligned orientation.

The formation of amyloid is facilitated by:

OXIDATIVE STRESS AND MITOCHONDRIAL INTEGRITY

In several diseases oxidative stress has been implicated in neurodegeneration. The formation of free radicals is a normal event in metabolism and there are several physiological antioxidant defence systems that scavenge free radicals, minimizing possible toxic side effects. There is evidence that increased production of free radicals or inefficiencies in antioxidant defence systems may contribute to neurodegeneration. Exposure to environmental agents that are known to generate free radicals may be a contributing factor.

Increasingly, defects in mitochondrial biogenesis or degradation are being detected in neurodegenerative diseases; mutations in genes that regulate these aspects of mitochondrial function are responsible for some forms of familial Parkinson’s disease. Factors that are responsible for modulating mitochondrial integrity through fusion, fission and elimination in the process termed ‘mitophagy’ may all be involved in neurodegeneration, especially that linked to Parkinson’s disease.

INDUCTION OF PROGRAMMED CELL DEATH

The death of neurons in at least some neurodegenerative diseases has been linked to the form of programmed cell death termed apoptosis (Fig. 26.3). The stimuli that trigger this in the different diseases are at present uncertain. Initiating factors under consideration include excitotoxicity, deprivation of neurotrophic growth factors, toxicity of local cytokines, and toxic effects of accumulated proteins. The end result of mitochondrial damage can also result in signaling for apoptosis. However it is important to note that other forms of cell death which are also energy dependent and ‘programmed’ may take place in some situations and are not the same process as conventional apoptotic cell death.

GENETIC FACTORS

Many genes responsible for neurodegenerative diseases have been characterized and the identification of such genes has led to major advances in the understanding of disease pathogenesis. A large number neurodegenerative diseases can be caused by single gene mutations but these account for a very small proportion of cases. A genetic abnormality that underlies several neurodegenerative diseases is microsatellite repeat instability leading to expansion of the number of tandem triplet repeats that occur in specific regions of certain genes (Fig. 26.4). This leads to interference with RNA processing and is common to several degenerative diseases. Some neurodegenerative diseases result from interactions between multiple susceptibility factors (e.g. at least 10 genes in addition to environmental factors such as head injury are involved in the development of Alzheimer’s disease) (Fig. 26.5).

Genome-wide association studies are now starting to reveal genes that act as risk factors for neurodegeneration and are beginning to identify pathways which predispose to neurodegeneration. Increasingly, these insights into the process of neurodegeneration are being refined using transgenic models of disease. Models of Alzheimer’s disease, Huntington disease, tauopathies, synucleinopathies, and inherited cerebellar ataxias are all being developed and explored.

REFERENCES

Abeliovich, A. Parkinson’s disease: Mitochondrial damage control. Nature.. 2010;463:744–745.

Ali, Y.O., Kitay, B.M., Zhai, R.G. Dealing with misfolded proteins: examining the neuroprotective role of molecular chaperones in neurodegeneration. Molecules.. 2010;15:6859–6887.

Barnum, C.J., Tansey, M.G. Modeling neuroinflammatory pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Prog Brain Res.. 2010;184:113–132.

Bekris, L.M., Mata, I.F., Zabetian, C.P. The genetics of Parkinson disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol.. 2010;23:228–242.

Bekris, L.M., Yu, C.E., Bird, T.D., et al. Genetics of Alzheimer disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol.. 2010;23:213–227.

Bertram, L., Lill, C.M., Tanzi, R.E. The genetics of Alzheimer disease: back to the future. Neuron.. 2010;68:270–281.

Brouwer, J.R., Willemsen, R., Oostra, B.A. Microsatellite repeat instability and neurological disease. Bioessays.. 2009;31:71–83.

Brown, G.C. Mechanisms of inflammatory neurodegeneration: iNOS and NADPH oxidase. Biochem Soc Trans.. 2007;35:1119–1121.

Chen-Plotkin, A.S., Lee, V.M., Trojanowski, J.Q. TAR DNA-binding protein 43 in neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurol.. 2010;6:211–220.

Cuervo, A.M., Wong, E.S., Martinez-Vicente, M. Protein degradation, aggregation, and misfolding. Mov Disord.. 2010;25:S49–S54.

Cummings, J.L. Toward a molecular neuropsychiatry of neurodegenerative diseases. Ann Neurol.. 2003;54:147–154.

Double, K.L., Reyes, S., Werry, E.L., et al. Selective cell death in neurodegeneration: why are some neurons spared in vulnerable regions? Prog Neurobiol.. 2010;92:316–329.

Gendron, T.F., Josephs, K.A., Petrucelli, L. Transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43): mechanisms of neurodegeneration. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol.. 2010;36:97–112.

Glass, C.K., Saijo, K., Winner, B., et al. Mechanisms underlying inflammation in neurodegeneration. Cell.. 2010;140:918–934.

Glick, D., Barth, S., Macleod, K.F. Autophagy: cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Pathol.. 2010;221:3–12.

Graeber, M.B., Moran, L.B. Mechanisms of cell death in neurodegenerative diseases: fashion, fiction, and facts. Brain Pathol.. 2002;12(3):385–390.

Hardy, J., Selkoe, D.J. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science.. 2002;297:353–356.

Higgins, G.C., Beart, P.M., Shin, Y.S., et al. Oxidative stress: emerging mitochondrial and cellular themes and variations in neuronal injury. J Alzheimers Dis.. 2010;20:S453–S473.

Huang, Q., Figueiredo-Pereira, M.E. Ubiquitin/proteasome pathway impairment in neurodegeneration: therapeutic implications. Apoptosis.. 2010;15:1292–1311.

Jellinger, K.A. Recent advances in our understanding of neurodegeneration. J Neural Transm.. 2009;116:1111–1162.

Jones, N. PINK1 targets dysfunctional mitochondria for autophagy in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol.. 2010;6:181.

Kovacs, G.G., Botond, G., Budka, H. Protein coding of neurodegenerative dementias: the neuropathological basis of biomarker diagnostics. Acta Neuropathol (Berl).. 2010;119:389–408.

Kwong, L.K., Neumann, M., Sampathu, D.M., et al. TDP-43 proteinopathy: the neuropathology underlying major forms of sporadic and familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration and motor neuron disease. Acta Neuropathol (Berl).. 2007;114:63–70.

Lazarov, O., Mattson, M.P., Peterson, D.A., et al. When neurogenesis encounters aging and disease. Trends Neurosci.. 2010;33:569–579.

Layfield, R., Alban, A., Mayer, R.J., et al. The ubiquitin protein catabolic disorders. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol.. 2001;27(3):171–179.

Li, L.B., Bonini, N.M. Roles of trinucleotide-repeat RNA in neurological disease and degeneration. Trends Neurosci.. 2010;33:292–298.

Mackenzie, I.R., Rademakers, R., Neumann, M. TDP-43 and FUS in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Lancet Neurol.. 2010;9:995–1007.

Matsuda, N., Tanaka, K. Uncovering the roles of PINK1 and parkin in mitophagy. Autophagy.. 2010;6:952–954.

Rogers, N., Paine, S., Bedford, L., et al. The ubiquitin-proteasome system: contributions to cell death or survival in neurodegeneration. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol.. 2010;36:113–124.

Schapira, A.H. Mitochondria in the aetiology and pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol.. 2008;7:97–109.

Shin, J., Charizanis, K., Swanson, M.S. Pathogenic RNAs in microsatellite expansion disease. Neurosci Lett.. 2009;466:99–102.

Spillantini, M.G., Goedert, M. The alpha-synucleinopathies: Parkinson’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and multiple system atrophy. Ann N Y Acad Sci.. 2000;920:16–27.

Swerdlow, R.H. The neurodegenerative mitochondriopathies. J Alzheimers Dis.. 2009;17:737–751.

Tansey, M.G., Goldberg, M.S. Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease: its role in neuronal death and implications for therapeutic intervention. Neurobiol Dis.. 2010;37:510–518.

Todd, P.K., Paulson, H.L. RNA-mediated neurodegeneration in repeat expansion disorders. Ann Neurol.. 2010;67:291–300.

Vives-Bauza, C., Przedborski, S. Mitophagy: the latest problem for Parkinson’s disease. Trends Mol Med.. 2011;17:158–165.

Wadsworth, J.D., Collinge, J. Molecular pathology of human prion disease. Acta Neuropathol (Berl).. 2011;121:69–77.

Witte, M.E., Geurts, J.J., de Vries, H.E., et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction: a potential link between neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration? Mitochondrion.. 2010;10:411–418.

Wong, E., Cuervo, A.M. Autophagy gone awry in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Neurosci.. 2010;13:805–811.