Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Published on 12/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Pulmolory and Respiratory

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2553 times

6

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

The term chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) refers to chronic disorders that disturb airflow, whether the most prominent process is within the airways or within the lung parenchyma. The two disorders generally included in this category are chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Although the pathophysiology of airflow obstruction is different in the two disorders, patients frequently have features of both, so it is appropriate to discuss them together. Asthma could logically also be in this category, but it is discussed in Chapter 5 because the term COPD, as commonly used, does not usually include bronchial asthma.

Other terms synonymous with COPD are chronic airflow limitation, chronic airflow obstruction, chronic obstructive airways disease, and chronic obstructive lung disease. Because COPD is the term in most common use, it is used here as well. Emphysema is discussed in this section of the textbook dealing with airway disease, even though the most obvious and visible pathologic manifestations of emphysema affect the lung parenchyma.

Chronic bronchitis is a clinical diagnosis used for patients with chronic cough and sputum production. The condition has certain pathologic features, but the diagnosis refers to the specific clinical presentation. For epidemiologic purposes, a more formal definition has been used, one requiring the presence of a chronic productive cough on most days during at least 3 months per year for 2 or more consecutive years. However, for clinical purposes, the physician does not necessarily adhere to this formal time requirement. Patients with chronic bronchitis frequently have periods of worsening or exacerbation, often precipitated by respiratory tract infection. Unlike patients with asthma, however, patients with pure chronic bronchitis usually have residual clinical disease even between exacerbations, and their disease is not primarily one of airway hyperreactivity. The diagnosis of asthmatic bronchitis is often given to patients with chronic bronchitis and a prominent component of airway hyperreactivity, because features of both chronic bronchitis and asthma are present.

In contrast to the clinical diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, emphysema is formally a pathologic diagnosis, although certain clinical and laboratory features are also highly suggestive of the disease. Pathologically, emphysema is characterized by destruction of lung parenchyma and enlargement of air spaces distal to the terminal bronchiole. The region of the lung from the respiratory bronchioles down to the alveoli is involved, and determination of the particular type of emphysema depends on the pattern of destruction within the acinus. Antemortem diagnosis of emphysema obviously does not have the kind of confirmation offered by postmortem examination of the lung, but indirect support for the diagnosis is still useful and reasonably reliable.

Because chronic bronchitis and emphysema coexist to a variable extent in different patients, the broader term COPD is frequently more accurate. That these two disorders are tied so closely together is not surprising. A single etiologic factor—cigarette smoking—is primarily responsible for both processes. Inflammation induced by cigarette smoke, from the large airways down to the alveolar walls of the pulmonary parenchyma, is believed to be the common thread that ties together many of the varied manifestations of COPD. Throughout this chapter, specific reference is made to chronic bronchitis or to emphysema because some of the clinical and pathophysiologic features are distinct enough to warrant separate consideration. However, patients frequently do not fit neatly into these separate diagnostic categories.

The public health problems posed by COPD are enormous. Globally, it is estimated COPD affects 210 million people and accounts for 2.9 million deaths per year. In the United States alone, 16 million people have COPD, and it is the third most common cause of death. Morbidity in terms of chronic symptoms, days lost from work, and permanent disability is even more staggering. Unlike many diseases encountered by the physician, COPD is preventable in the majority of cases, because the main etiologic factor is well established and totally avoidable. Fortunately, since 1964 when the first Surgeon General’s report on smoking and health was published, the prevalence of smoking in the United States has decreased from 40% to approximately 22%. Nevertheless, there are still more than 45 million current smokers and a large reservoir of former smokers who have placed themselves at high risk for COPD and other smoking-related diseases. It is important to note that the vast majority of smokers start smoking in their teens and early 20s; smoking avoidance programs are most effective when aimed at this age group. Worldwide, an increasing prevalence of smoking in developing countries is contributing to the World Health Organization’s prediction that COPD will be the third most common cause of death worldwide in the year 2020.

Etiology and Pathogenesis

Factors that have been implicated in causing COPD include smoking, environmental pollution, infection, and genetics. Of these four, smoking is clearly the most important and the one that will receive most attention here. Yet the fact that symptomatic COPD develops in only about 20% of smokers suggests that other factors modify the risk. One other well-defined risk factor is discussed in detail in this section: inherited deficiency of the protein α1-antitrypsin. Other potential risk factors are discussed only briefly.

Smoking

Smoking affects the lung at multiple levels: bronchi, bronchioles, and pulmonary parenchyma. In the larger airways—the bronchi—smoking has a prominent effect on the structure and function of the mucus-secreting apparatus, the bronchial mucous glands. An increase in the number and size of these glands is responsible for excessive mucus within the airway lumen. The airway wall becomes thickened because of the hypertrophied and hyperplastic mucous glands as well as an influx of inflammatory cells (especially macrophages, neutrophils, and cytotoxic [CD8+] T lymphocytes) into the airway wall. Thickening of the wall diminishes the size of the airway lumen, and mucus within the lumen further compromises its patency. Release of a variety of mediators from the inflammatory cells, including leukotriene B4, interleukin (IL)-8, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, contributes to tissue damage and amplifies the inflammatory process in both the airways and lung parenchyma. Similarly, oxidative stress due to reactive oxygen species present in cigarette smoke or released from inflammatory cells contributes to the overall pathologic process.

At the same time more mucus is produced in the larger airways, clearance of mucus is altered by effects of cigarette smoke on the cilia lining the bronchial lumen. Structural changes in cilia after long-term exposure to cigarette smoke have been well documented, and functional studies have demonstrated impaired mucociliary clearance as a consequence of cigarette smoking.

The combined effects of smoking on mucus production, mucociliary clearance, and airway inflammation easily explain the epidemiologic data demonstrating a significant correlation between cigarette smoking and the symptoms of chronic bronchitis: cough and sputum production. Pipe and cigar smoking are also predisposing factors in the development of chronic bronchitis, but the risk is significantly less than that from cigarette smoking, probably because pipe and cigar smoke is generally not inhaled as extensively.

Small airways (bronchioles less than approximately 2 mm in diameter) are prominently affected by smoking. Smoking induces bronchiolar narrowing, inflammation, and fibrosis, with resulting airflow obstruction. These changes in the small airways or bronchioles are believed to be responsible for much of the airflow obstruction demonstrable in patients with mild COPD (discussed later under Pathophysiology).

In the pulmonary parenchyma, smoking results in eventual development of emphysema. An understanding of the concepts about how smoking leads to the destruction of alveolar walls, which is characteristic of emphysema, requires familiarity with the protease-antiprotease hypothesis. According to this theory, emphysema results from destruction of the connective tissue matrix of alveolar walls by proteolytic enzymes (proteases) released by inflammatory cells in the alveoli. Studies in animals have demonstrated that injection of several proteolytic (i.e., capable of breaking down protein) enzymes into the airways of animals results in pathologic and physiologic changes similar to those of clinical emphysema.

The particular proteolytic enzymes thought to contribute to emphysema are those capable of breaking down elastin, a complex structural protein found in the walls of alveoli. Elastase, one of several enzymes within the category of serine proteases, appears to be the most important of the proteolytic enzymes. Neutrophils are the major source of elastase within the lungs; therefore the enzyme is commonly called neutrophil elastase. If elastase were allowed to exert its proteolytic effect on elastin whenever it was released from a neutrophil, destruction of this important structural protein of the alveolar wall would ensue. Fortunately, an inhibitor of neutrophil elastase, usually called α1-antitrypsin but also sometimes called α1-antiprotease or α1-protease inhibitor, is normally present in the lung. It is believed that a balance between neutrophil elastase and its inhibitor prevents diffuse destruction of the alveolar walls. When this balance is disturbed, either by an increase in neutrophil elastase activity or by a decrease in anti-elastase activity, damage to elastin and to the alveolar wall can result, with eventual production of emphysema.

In smokers, the balance between elastase and anti-elastase is thought to be disturbed in more than one way by cigarette smoke. First, an increased number of neutrophils can be found in the lungs of smokers, providing a source for increased amounts of neutrophil elastase. Second, evidence indicates that oxidants derived from cigarette smoke and inflammatory cells can oxidize a critical amino acid residue of α1-antitrypsin at or near the site where the protease inhibitor binds to elastase. Oxidation of this amino acid interferes with the inhibitory activity of α1-antitrypsin, again tipping the balance in favor of increased elastase activity. Hence, cigarette smoking may be a compound insult, increasing the amount of neutrophil elastase in the lung and decreasing the normal inhibitory mechanism that serves to limit uncontrolled elastin breakdown by the enzyme. This pathogenetic sequence hypothesized for the development of emphysema is summarized in Figure 6-1.

In addition to degrading elastin in the alveolar wall, neutrophil elastase, when released in the airways, stimulates secretion of mucus. The primary defense against the action of neutrophil elastase in the airway is provided by secretory leukoprotease inhibitor, an antiprotease produced by airway epithelial and mucus-secreting cells.

Elastase is not the only proteolytic enzyme that has been implicated in the development of smoking-related damage and emphysema. Recent interest has focused on an additional group of enzymes called the matrix metalloproteinases, which are produced by macrophages and neutrophils and are capable of breaking down a variety of structural components of the alveolar wall. Like the relationship between elastase and its inhibitor α1-antitrypsin, the matrix metalloproteinases have a number of natural inhibitors, appropriately called tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases. Because of the influx of neutrophils and macrophages induced by cigarette smoke, it is believed that an increased burden of matrix metalloproteinases may result from smoking, potentially overwhelming the capability of the metalloproteinase inhibitors and contributing to the breakdown of alveolar walls.

Infection

Infections do not initiate the disease, but they do cause transient worsening of symptoms and pulmonary function in patients with preexisting COPD. Of the different types of respiratory tract infection, viral infection appears to be responsible for a large number of clinical exacerbations of symptoms. Bacterial infections probably play a less important role but can cause superinfection of patients already harboring an acute viral infection.

An interesting additional role for infection is suggested by data indicating that childhood respiratory tract infections may increase the risk for subsequent development of COPD. This may be one of the factors helping explain why development of COPD is not uniform in all smokers. Childhood respiratory infection might contribute to later risk for developing COPD by affecting lung growth and function during childhood. The smoker who starts with a lower level of function because of childhood respiratory infections may be more likely to suffer functionally important consequences from heavy smoking in later life.

Genetic Factors

Genetic factors presumably contribute to the risk for development of COPD, but the nature of the predisposition is poorly defined. The one hereditary factor best established as predisposing to emphysema is deficiency of the serum protein α1-antitrypsin. α1-Antitrypsin is a glycoprotein of the serine protease inhibitor (serpin) family that is produced by the liver and normally circulates in blood. Minor changes in the SERPINA1 gene, which codes for α1-antitrypsin, produce alterations in the structure of the protein that can be detected by biochemical methods. More than 100 different alleles of α1-antitrypsin have been identified. Each person has two genes coding for α1-antitrypsin, one of maternal origin and one of paternal origin. The normal (and most common) allele is the M allele, and the normal complement of two M genes is called MM. A person with the MM genotype has approximately 200 mg/dL of the M type of protease inhibitor circulating in the blood. With one of the variant alleles, termed Z, the amino acid sequence of the protein is slightly altered, impairing secretion of the protein from its site of production in the liver. Hence, the abnormal protein remains in globules in the liver, where it may result in liver disease, and only small amounts enter the blood. Individuals who are homozygous for the Z gene (i.e., with the ZZ genotype) have circulating levels of α1-antitrypsin that are approximately 15% of normal, or 30 mg/dL. Heterozygotes with one M and one Z gene (the MZ genotype) have intermediate levels of circulating α1-antitrypsin in the range of 50% to 60% of normal levels.

The ZZ genotype is a strong risk factor for premature development of emphysema, particularly if the individual is a smoker. Emphysema frequently develops as early as the third or fourth decade of life in persons with the ZZ genotype (who are commonly said to have α1-antitrypsin deficiency because of low serum levels). As mentioned earlier, the structural integrity of alveolar walls appears to depend on the balance between elastin degradation by elastase and protection from this destruction afforded by α1-antitrypsin. In patients with α1-antitrypsin deficiency, lack of the elastase inhibitor is believed to permit elastase action to proceed in an unchecked fashion, and early development of emphysema is the consequence.

Another factor of interest, one that presumably is at least partially genetically determined, is the degree of the patient’s preexisting bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Data support the hypothesis that accelerated decline in lung function occurs in patients who have greater levels of bronchial responsiveness. However, this is an area of controversy, in part because the potential for smoking to induce changes in bronchial responsiveness makes it difficult to determine cause/effect relationships.

Pathology

Much of the pathology in chronic bronchitis relates to mucus and the mucus-secreting apparatus in the airways. Mucus-secreting glands and goblet cells are responsible for production of bronchial secretions, but the mucous glands are the more important source (see Chapter 4). In chronic bronchitis, enlargement (hypertrophy and hyperplasia) of the mucus-secreting glands has been objectively assessed by comparing the relative thickness of the mucous glands with the total thickness of the airway wall. This ratio, known as the Reid index, is increased in patients with chronic bronchitis. In general, the number of goblet cells in the airways is increased as well, and these particular cells are abundant in airways more peripheral than usual. These alterations in the mucus-secreting apparatus increase the quantity of airway mucus, and its composition is likely altered as well. In practice, the secretions found in patients often are thick and more viscous than usual. Bronchial walls demonstrate evidence of an inflammatory process, with cellular infiltration and variable degrees of fibrosis.

In the smaller airways (e.g., bronchioles), inflammation, fibrosis, intraluminal mucus, and an increase in goblet cells all contribute to a decrease in luminal diameter. Because the resistance of airways varies inversely with the fourth power of the radius, even small changes in bronchiolar size may result in major impairment to airflow at the level of the small airways. These pathologic changes in the small airways are thought to be the primary cause of airflow obstruction in patients with mild COPD.

In patients with severe chronic airflow obstruction, the most important process responsible for airflow obstruction is emphysema. As mentioned earlier, the pathology of emphysema is characterized by destruction of alveolar walls and enlargement of terminal air spaces (Fig. 6-2). Several types of emphysema have distinct pathologic features, primarily dependent on the distribution of the lesions. The most important types are panacinar (panlobular) emphysema and centriacinar (centrilobular) emphysema (Fig. 6-3). Panacinar emphysema is characterized by a relatively uniform involvement of the acinus, the region beyond the terminal bronchiole, including respiratory bronchioles, alveolar ducts, and alveolar sacs. Examination of a section of lung with panacinar emphysema shows that the damage in an involved area is relatively diffuse (Fig. 6-4). Typically the lower zones of the lung are more involved than the upper zones. Panacinar emphysema is the usual type of emphysema described in patients who have α1-antitrypsin deficiency, although the condition is not limited to this clinical setting.

In centrilobular emphysema, the predominant involvement and dilation are found in the proximal part of the acinus, the respiratory bronchiole. The appearance of a lung section with centrilobular emphysema is different from that with panacinar emphysema. In centrilobular emphysema, involvement in an affected area seems to be more irregular, with apparently spared alveolar tissue between the dilated respiratory bronchioles at the center of the acinus (Fig. 6-5). This type of emphysema is the typical form seen in smokers. It is reasonable to speculate that the prominent involvement focused around the respiratory bronchiole is a consequence of extension of the bronchiolar inflammation in mild COPD.

Pathophysiology

Underlying a discussion of the pathophysiology of COPD is the fact that cigarette smoking affects the large airways, small airways, and pulmonary parenchyma. The pathophysiologic consequences resulting from disease at each of these levels contribute to the overall clinical picture of COPD. In addition, the degree of airway reactivity, which probably is affected by genetic and environmental factors, appears to modify the clinical expression of disease in a given patient. This section simplifies, summarizes, and places into a conceptual framework some of the information regarding structure-function correlations for each of these aspects of COPD.

Functional Abnormalities in Airways Disease

In the larger airways (bronchi), an increase in the mucus-secreting apparatus and the amount of mucus produced results in the symptoms of excessive cough and sputum production characteristic of chronic bronchitis. A decrease in the size of the large airways as a result of secretions, an increase in the mucus-secreting apparatus, and inflammation might be expected to correlate well with the degree of airflow obstruction, but this does not necessarily appear to be the case. Some patients with typical symptoms of chronic bronchitis do not exhibit abnormally high resistance or changes in other measurements of airflow. When airflow obstruction exists, in general additional pathologic factors, either in the small airways (inflammation and fibrosis) or pulmonary parenchyma (emphysema), are critical for the presence of obstruction. In relatively mild airflow obstruction associated with chronic bronchitis, disease in the small airways often makes an important contribution to airflow obstruction. When airflow obstruction is more marked, coexisting emphysema is often the primary reason for the obstruction.

In patients who have a component of airway hyperreactivity contributing to their disease, the clinical expression often is more like asthmatic bronchitis. Airway smooth muscle constriction adds more reversible airflow obstruction than is typically seen in the patient without airway hyperreactivity.

The common problem produced by the processes affecting airways is a decrease in the overall cross-sectional area of the airways. Airways resistance (Raw) is potentially increased by anything that compromises the lumen of the airways: intraluminal secretions, bronchospasm, or thickening of the airway wall caused by edema, inflammatory cells, fibrosis, or enlargement of the mucus-secreting apparatus, for example. When disease is located primarily in the peripheral airways and is mild, the functional consequences may be relatively subtle. Because the peripheral airways contribute only about 10% to 20% of overall airways resistance, total resistance is preserved unless small airways disease is considerable or additional disease affects the larger airways.

As another consequence of airways disease, expiratory flow rates—including forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio, and maximal midexpiratory flow rate (MMFR)—are generally decreased. Use of inhaled bronchodilators may or may not result in significantly improved flow rates. Patients with asthmatic bronchitis and greater airway reactivity generally have the most striking improvement in flow rates after receiving an inhaled bronchodilator.

Before a discussion of how lung volumes change in patients having the airway disease associated with COPD, it is useful to review the factors that determine major lung volumes: total lung capacity (TLC), functional residual capacity (FRC), and residual volume (RV). TLC is the point at which the force of the inspiratory muscles acting to expand the lungs is equaled by the elastic recoil of the respiratory system (primarily lung recoil) resisting expansion (see Chapter 1). At FRC, the resting point of the respiratory system, there is a balance between the elastic recoil of the lungs and the elastic recoil of the chest wall, which are acting in opposite directions—the lungs inward and the chest wall outward. The determinants of RV depend to some extent on age. In a normal young person, RV is the point at which the relatively stiff chest wall can be compressed no further by the expiratory muscles. With increasing age, a sufficient number of airways close at low lung volumes to limit further expiration, and airway closure is an important determinant of RV. In disease states in which airways are likely to close at low lung volumes, airway closure is associated with an elevated RV, even in young patients.

In patients with pure airway disease, TLC theoretically remains relatively close to normal because neither the elastic recoil of the lung nor inspiratory muscle strength is altered. Similarly, FRC should remain normal because the recoil of the lung and the recoil of the chest wall are unchanged. However, if expiration is prolonged and the respiratory rate is high, the patient may not have sufficient time during expiration to reach the normal resting end-expiratory point. In this case, FRC is increased. RV is generally also increased with these processes that involve airways, because the narrowing and occlusion of small airways by secretions and inflammation result in air trapping during expiration.

Functional Abnormalities in Emphysema

Although emphysema (i.e., destruction of alveolar walls) leads to decreased expiratory flow rates, the pathophysiology is different from the situation in pure airway disease. The primary problem in emphysema is loss of elastic recoil (i.e., loss of the lung’s natural tendency to resist expansion). One consequence of decreased elastic recoil is a decreased driving pressure that expels air from the alveoli during expiration. A simple analogy is a balloon filled with air, in which the elastic recoil is the “stiffness” of the balloon. With a given volume of air inside an unsealed balloon, a stiffer balloon will expel air more rapidly than a less stiff balloon. An emphysematous lung is like a less stiff balloon: a smaller than normal force drives air out of the lungs during expiration.

Loss of driving pressure is not the only consequence of emphysema. There is also an indirect effect on the collapsibility of airways. Normally, outward traction is exerted on the walls of airways by a supporting structure of tissue from the lung parenchyma. When the alveolar tissue is disrupted, as in emphysema, the supporting structure for the airways is diminished, and less radial traction is exerted to prevent airway collapse (Fig. 6-6). During a forced expiration, the strongly positive pleural pressure promotes collapse. Airways lacking an adequate supporting structure are more likely to collapse (and have diminished flow rates and air trapping) than normally supported airways.

The decrease in elastic recoil in emphysema also alters the compliance curve of the lung and measured lung volumes. The compliance curve relates transpulmonary pressure and the associated volume of gas within the lung (see Chapter 1). Because an emphysematous lung has less elastic recoil (i.e., is less stiff), it resists expansion less than its normal counterpart, the compliance curve is shifted upward and to the left, and the lung has more volume at any particular transpulmonary pressure (Fig. 6-7). TLC is increased because loss of elastic recoil results in a smaller force opposing the action of the inspiratory musculature. FRC is also increased because the balance between the outward recoil of the chest wall and the inward recoil of the lung is shifted in favor of the chest wall. As in bronchitis, RV is substantially increased in emphysema because poorly supported airways are more susceptible to closure during a maximal expiration.

Mechanisms of Abnormal Gas Exchange

In obstructive lung disease, many of the observed pathologic changes affecting airflow are not uniformly distributed. For example, in chronic bronchitis, some airways are extensively affected by secretions and plugging, but others remain relatively uninvolved, so ventilation is not uniformly distributed throughout the lung. Regions of the lung supplied by more diseased airways receive diminished ventilation in comparison with regions supplied by less diseased airways. Although there may be a compensatory decrease in blood flow to underventilated alveoli, the compensation is not totally effective, and inequalities and mismatching of ventilation and perfusion result. This type of ventilation-perfusion disturbance, with some areas of lung having low ventilation-perfusion ratios and contributing desaturated blood, leads to arterial hypoxemia.

Carbon dioxide elimination is impaired in some patients with obstructive lung disease. The mechanism of alveolar hypoventilation and CO2 retention is less clear than the mechanism of hypoxemia. Several factors probably contribute, including increased work of breathing (due to impaired airflow), abnormalities of central ventilatory drive, and ventilation-perfusion mismatch creating some areas with high ventilation-perfusion ratios that effectively act as dead space.

An additional problem, fatigue of inspiratory muscles, has received attention as a factor contributing to acute CO2 retention when affected patients are in respiratory failure (see Chapter 19). The importance of diaphragmatic fatigue in the stable patient with chronic hypercapnia is less certain. However, it is clear that contraction of the diaphragm, the major muscle of inspiration, is less efficient and less effective in patients with obstructive lung disease. When FRC is increased, the diaphragm is lower and flatter, and its fibers are shortened even before the initiation of inspiration. A shortened, flattened diaphragm is at a mechanical disadvantage compared with a longer, curved diaphragm, and it is less effective as an inspiratory muscle.

Pulmonary Hypertension

A potential complication of COPD is development of pulmonary hypertension (i.e., high pressures within the pulmonary arterial system). Long-standing pulmonary hypertension places an added workload onto the right ventricle, which hypertrophies and eventually may fail. The term cor pulmonale is used to describe disease of the right ventricle secondary to lung disease (either COPD or other forms of lung disease); this topic is discussed in Chapter 14. The primary feature of COPD that leads to pulmonary hypertension and eventually to cor pulmonale is hypoxia. A decrease in PO2 is a strong stimulus to constriction of pulmonary arterioles (see Chapter 12). If hypoxia is corrected, the element of pulmonary vasoconstriction may be reversible, but vascular remodeling from chronic hypoxia may not fully reverse.

Several other but less important factors that may contribute to elevated pulmonary artery pressure are hypercapnia, polycythemia, and reduction in area of the pulmonary vascular bed. Hypercapnia, like hypoxia, is capable of causing pulmonary vasoconstriction. To a large extent, this effect may be mediated by the change in pH resulting from an increase in PCO2. An elevation in hematocrit (i.e., polycythemia) is often found in the chronically hypoxemic patient, producing increased blood viscosity and contributing to elevated pulmonary artery pressure. Finally, in emphysema, destruction of alveoli is accompanied by a loss of pulmonary capillaries. Therefore, in extensive disease, the limited pulmonary vascular bed may result in a high resistance to blood flow and consequently an increase in pulmonary artery pressure.

COPD Phenotypes

In the past, clinicians and researchers often distinguished two pathophysiologic types of COPD: type A and type B. These subtypes are no longer included in the definition of COPD, but the terms are embedded in older literature, so a brief discussion is given here. As originally conceived, type A (so-called pink puffer) physiology was associated with underlying emphysema, high minute ventilation, and relatively normal arterial PO2. Type B (so-called blue bloater) physiology was equated with chronic bronchitis, hypoxemia, and hypercapnia. These two types were thought to represent the two ends of the spectrum of COPD: “pure” emphysema or “pure” airways disease. It is now recognized that this framework is not useful in classifying patients, since the vast majority of patients with COPD have both aspects of the disease. Currently, intense research is focused on better understanding of COPD phenotypes, with the goal of developing different physiologically relevant classifications of the disease.

Clinical Features

Symptoms most commonly experienced by patients with COPD include dyspnea and cough, frequently with sputum production. Cough and sputum production may precede development of dyspnea by many years. Most patients are symptomatic, but some are symptom free, and the diagnosis of COPD is determined on the basis of pulmonary function tests.

Frequently patients have a certain level of chronic symptoms, but their disease course is punctuated by periods of exacerbation. An exacerbation is defined as an acute event characterized by worsening of symptoms that requires a change in medication. The precipitating factor producing an exacerbation is often a respiratory tract infection, particularly of viral origin. In addition, bacteria may be chronically present in the tracheobronchial tree, which normally should be sterile, and an acute bacterial infection, often due to acquisition of a new strain of the colonizing bacteria, can sometimes be implicated in acute exacerbations. Other factors that cause acute deterioration in patients include exposure to air pollutants, bronchospasm (particularly if patients have a superimposed asthmatic component to their disease), and congestive heart failure. However, in up to a third of cases, the cause of an exacerbation cannot be identified. When exacerbations are severe, patients may go into frank respiratory failure, a complication discussed in Chapter 27.

In addition to chronic symptoms of dyspnea, cough, or both, which may worsen during periods of acute exacerbation, patients may experience secondary cardiovascular complications of their lung disease (i.e., cor pulmonale). Patients with chronic hypoxemia and hypercarbia are particularly at increased risk for cor pulmonale.

Early in the course of the disease, physical examination may be normal or show only a prolonged expiratory time. As the process becomes more severe, characteristic findings are common. Breath sounds are generally decreased in intensity, and expiration is prolonged. Wheezing may be heard but does not necessarily reflect reversible bronchospasm. Some patients do not wheeze during normal tidal breathing but do so when asked to give a forced exhalation. In patients with profuse airway secretions, coarse gurgling sounds labeled as rhonchi are frequently appreciated. Examination of the chest often discloses an increased anteroposterior diameter, indicating hyperinflation of the lungs. When diaphragmatic excursion is assessed by percussion of the lung bases during inspiration and expiration, diminished movement is noted.

In advanced COPD, patients may use accessory muscles of respiration (e.g., sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles), and the intercostal muscles may retract with each inspiration. The patient may assume a characteristic “tripod” position, leaning forward on straight arms allowing fixation of the clavicles and more effective use of accessory muscles. Severe disease may also be complicated by weight loss and muscle wasting. When cor pulmonale is present, with or without frank right ventricular failure, patients have the cardiac findings described in Chapter 14.

Smoking not only is the primary factor that initiates COPD, it is also a major risk factor that determines the prognosis of a patient’s illness. Patients who continue to smoke appear to have the greatest further deterioration of pulmonary function over time. Exacerbations and respiratory tract infections frequently cause acute deterioration in lung function, but their effect on the long-term rate at which pulmonary function is lost is not well established. Nonetheless, infections are the most important cause of acute mortality in patients with COPD, pointing to the need for influenza and pneumococcal vaccination, as well as rapid appropriate treatment of bacterial respiratory infections.

A wide spectrum of severity is characteristic of COPD, so morbidity from the disease varies tremendously among patients. Patients with mild disease are able to continue their usual work and lifestyle with minimal if any changes. Patients with severe disease are quite limited in their capacity for any exertion, are subject to frequent hospitalizations, and may have a life expectancy of less than 5 years.

Diagnostic Approach and Assessment

In most cases, the diagnosis of COPD is suspected on the basis of history and physical examination, but spirometry with evidence of persistent airflow obstruction is still required to confirm the diagnosis in this clinical context. Chronic bronchitis is actually a clinical diagnosis, and the history is particularly crucial. Although emphysema is formally a pathologic diagnosis, a lung biopsy is not performed to make the diagnosis. Pathologic confirmation is generally obtained only at postmortem examination, if one is performed.

Chest radiographs have poor sensitivity in detecting COPD but are valuable in excluding other processes that cause dyspnea, such as congestive heart failure, pulmonary fibrosis, or pleural disease. Patients with chronic bronchitis alone frequently have a normal chest radiograph. When present, chest radiographic findings suggestive of COPD include signs of hyperinflation such as large lung volumes, flat diaphragms, an increased retrosternal air space, increased anteroposterior diameter (seen on the lateral view), and a paucity of vascular markings. Hyperinflation associated with decreased vascular markings in the lungs results from destruction of alveolar septa and enlargement of alveolar spaces and has been called the arterial deficiency pattern of emphysema (Fig. 6-8). In patients with α1-antitrypsin deficiency and early onset of emphysema, the arterial deficiency pattern is quite striking in the lower lobes, where there may be almost a complete loss of vascular markings.

When cor pulmonale develops in patients with COPD, findings of pulmonary hypertension may be seen. These include enlargement of the proximal pulmonary arteries, pronounced tapering of the distal vessels, and cardiomegaly indicative of right ventricular hypertrophy or dilation.

High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is recognized as a more sensitive imaging method than plain chest radiography for detecting emphysema. Because it is expensive and rarely changes the management plan in this setting, it should not be considered part of the usual diagnostic evaluation for most COPD patients. However, HRCT is an important step in characterizing the extent and distribution of emphysema in patients for whom lung volume reduction surgery is being considered.

The most useful physiologic adjuncts in evaluating patients with COPD are pulmonary function tests and arterial blood gas analysis. Pulmonary function tests demonstrate airflow obstruction, with decreases in FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC ratio, and MMFR. Measurements of lung volume generally give evidence of air trapping, with an elevation in RV. In patients whose lung compliance is increased (i.e., patients with emphysema), TLC is generally elevated. FRC is elevated as a result of either increased compliance (decreased elastic recoil) in emphysema or insufficient expiratory time in the face of significant airflow obstruction. Whether emphysema is present can be indirectly assessed by measuring the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide. In patients with emphysema, in whom the surface area for gas exchange is lost, the diffusing capacity typically is decreased. In pure airway disease (e.g., chronic bronchitis without emphysema), the diffusing capacity is generally normal.

Pulse oximetry is routinely used to evaluate patients with COPD, since supplemental oxygen is an important treatment in patients with hypoxemia (see later.) If the clinician is concerned about CO2 retention or the accuracy of pulse oximetry, arterial blood gases are necessary. Typically, patients with mild to moderate COPD have an increased alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient and mild hypoxemia. In more severe disease, hypoxemia worsens, and hypercarbia (CO2 retention) may develop. With chronic elevation in PCO2, the kidneys retain bicarbonate in an attempt to compensate and return the pH toward normal. With acute exacerbations of COPD, hypoxemia frequently worsens and CO2 retention becomes more pronounced, such that the pH may drop from the stable compensated value.

Treatment

Several modalities of treatment, used either individually or in combination, are available for patients with COPD. Although bronchoconstriction in these patients is considerably less than in patients with bronchial asthma, bronchodilators remain an important part of the treatment of many COPD patients. The agents used are identical to those discussed in Chapter 5, including sympathomimetic agents (β2 agonists), anticholinergic drugs, and methylxanthines. Short-acting inhaled β2 agonists (e.g., albuterol), short-acting anticholinergic agents (e.g., ipratropium), or both are most commonly used as needed for patients with mild disease who require only infrequent therapy. For patients with more severe disease who require regular therapy, either a long-acting β2 agonist (e.g., salmeterol, formoterol, arformoterol), a long-acting anticholinergic agent (e.g., tiotropium), or both are commonly used, although regular use of short-acting agents is an alternative. The methylxanthine theophylline is another option, but concern for systemic side effects often relegates it to a secondary role in comparison with the inhaled bronchodilators.

Corticosteroid use for COPD treatment is evolving and dependent on the clinical setting. A 10- to 14-day course of systemic corticosteroids is frequently administered at the time of an acute exacerbation, and most studies suggest a benefit of improved pulmonary function and reduced treatment failure in this setting. On the other hand, only a minority of patients with chronic, stable, but severe disease show improved pulmonary function after a regimen of oral corticosteroids. Inhaled corticosteroids have little use in the setting of acute exacerbations of COPD. However, a trial of inhaled corticosteroids should be considered in patients with moderate to severe COPD who have frequent exacerbations, because some evidence indicates that inhaled corticosteroids may reduce the frequency or severity of exacerbations.

Newly available medications for treatment of COPD include indacaterol and roflumilast. Indacaterol is an ultralong-acting β2 agonist and functions through the same pathways as other β2 agonists. Roflumilast is a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor and represents a new class of medications for COPD. Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors decrease inflammation and promote airway smooth muscle relaxation and bronchodilation. The specific role of these new medications in treating COPD is still uncertain.

Patients with COPD who develop an acute respiratory tract infection, or patients with an exacerbation of their disease without a clear precipitant, are often treated with antibiotics. The primary usefulness of antibiotics is treatment of bacterial infections. A bacterial cause is difficult to document with certainty, however, and many exacerbations are thought to be either noninfectious or triggered by viral respiratory infections. In practice, patients are frequently treated with antibiotics when a change in quantity, color, and/or thickness of sputum in comparison with the usual pattern of sputum production is noted, regardless of whether a bacterial infection is documented. Of the potential bacterial pathogens, those most frequently implicated are Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. As a result, the choice of antibiotic should provide coverage for these organisms.

An important therapy is administration of supplemental O2 to patients with significant hypoxemia (i.e., systemic arterial oxygen saturation ≤ 88% or arterial PO2 ≤ 55 mm Hg). Fortunately, the PO2 of hypoxemic patients with COPD usually responds quite well to even relatively small amounts of supplemental O2 (range, 24%–28% O2). A low flow rate of O2 (1–2 L/min) given by nasal prongs is an effective, well-tolerated method for achieving these concentrations of inspired O2. Oxygen is particularly important in patients with pulmonary hypertension and in those with secondary polycythemia, because each of these complications is largely due to hypoxemia and responsive to treatment for it. Evidence suggests that long-term survival of hypoxemic patients with COPD can be improved by chronic administration of supplemental O2. For hypoxemic patients, administering supplemental O2 has been shown to alter the natural history of the disease and improve long-term survival.

The goal of O2 therapy is to shift PO2 into the range where hemoglobin is almost fully saturated (i.e., PO2 > 60–65 mm Hg). Ideally, O2 saturation should be well maintained on a continuous basis throughout the day and night. In some COPD patients who are not significantly hypoxemic during the day, a substantial drop in PO2 and O2 saturation can occur at night. In these patients, nocturnal O2 theoretically may be of benefit, although this has not been proven.

For patients in whom airway secretions cause significant symptoms, chest physiotherapy and postural drainage are sometimes used to help mobilize and clear secretions. These techniques use percussion of the chest wall to loosen secretions and induce cough, followed by positional changes to allow gravity to aid in drainage of secretions. Handheld mucus-clearing devices are also available. To use these devices, the patient exhales into the apparatus, which applies oscillatory positive end-expiratory pressure, allowing more efficient clearance of secretions. However, the usefulness of chest physiotherapy and postural drainage or mucus-clearing devices is not generally accepted because outcome studies have not clearly supported their benefit.

In the small subgroup of patients with COPD who have α1-antitrypsin deficiency, therapy is available in the form of intravenous α1-antitrypsin concentrate prepared from pooled human plasma. The rationale for this therapy is to replace the deficient protease inhibitor and attempt to inhibit or prevent unchecked proteolytic destruction of alveolar tissue. Although intravenous infusions of α1-antitrypsin have been shown to increase concentrations of this antiprotease in alveolar epithelial lining fluid, whether such replacement therapy alters the accelerated decline in pulmonary function is not definitively known.

In patients with impaired exercise tolerance secondary to COPD, a rehabilitation program focusing on education and a regimen of exercise training often is quite beneficial. Most patients participating in such a program report an improved sense of well-being at the same time they experience an improvement in exercise tolerance. Smoking cessation education and assistance are absolutely critical parts of any comprehensive therapeutic program. Pharmacologic assistance to ameliorate the effects of nicotine withdrawal—nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion, or varenicline—is often a valuable component of smoking cessation efforts. Vaccination against influenza and pneumococcus is indicated for all patients as a preventive strategy and a component of the overall therapeutic regimen.

Two surgical approaches have been used for patients with severe COPD who remain markedly symptomatic despite optimal therapy. One approach, lung volume reduction surgery, initially seems counterintuitive because it involves removing portions of both lungs from patients whose pulmonary reserve is marginal at best. However, two interesting pathophysiologic rationales underlie this approach. First, removal of some lung tissue diminishes overall intrathoracic volume, allowing the flattened and foreshortened diaphragm to return toward its normal position and resume its usual curved configuration. A flattened, foreshortened diaphragm is an inefficient respiratory muscle, and the changes in its position and shape following surgery facilitate its effectiveness during inspiration. Second, when the most diseased regions of lung are selectively removed (i.e., the regions with the least elastic recoil), the overall elastic recoil of the lung improves. Lung elastic recoil is an important determinant of expiratory flow and airway collapse, and improving elastic recoil has secondary benefits on airway patency and expiratory flow. Although lung volume reduction surgery is a novel and potentially attractive approach, it appears to be beneficial only in well-selected patients. Critical aspects of patient selection include the severity of disease and the anatomic distribution of emphysematous changes.

The other surgical approach to treatment of end-stage COPD is lung transplantation. However, this is not a practical approach for large numbers of individuals because of the resources needed, the shortage of donor organs, and the age of most patients with COPD. Patients whose emphysema is due to α1-antitrypsin deficiency, in whom the disease occurs at an early age, may be a particularly appropriate subgroup to consider for lung transplantation.

When acute respiratory failure supervenes as a part of COPD, mechanical ventilation may be necessary to support gas exchange and maintain acceptable arterial blood gas values. Such ventilatory assistance with intermittent positive pressure may be delivered via either a mask (noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation) or an endotracheal tube. More detailed information about the treatment of acute respiratory failure superimposed on chronic disease of the obstructive variety is covered in Chapter 27. Mechanical ventilation is discussed in Chapter 29.

References

Etiology and Pathogenesis

Antó, JM, Vermeire, P, Vestbo, J, et al. Epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 2001;17:982–994.

Brusselle, GG, Joos, GF, Bracke, KR. New insights into the immunology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet. 2011;378:1015–1026.

Carrell, RW, Lomas, DA. Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency—a model for conformational diseases. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:45–53.

Cosio, MG, Saetta, M, Agusti, A. Immunologic aspects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2445–2454.

Criner, GJ, Cordova, F, Sternberg, AL, et al. Part I: Lessons learned about emphysema. The National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:763–770.

Djukanovic, R, Gadola, SD. Virus infection, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2062–2064.

Eisner, MD, Anthonisen, N, Coultas, D, et al. An official American Thoracic Society public policy statement: novel risk factors and the global burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:693–718.

Hurst, JR, Vestbo, J, Anzueto, A, et al. Susceptibility to exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints (ECLIPSE) Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1128–1138.

Lamela, J, Vega, F. Immunologic aspects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1024.

Martinez, CH, Han, MK. Contribution of the environment and comorbidities to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease phenotypes. Med Clin North Am. 2012;96:713–727.

McDonough, JE, Yuan, R, Suzuki, M, et al. Small-airway obstruction and emphysema in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1567–1575.

Sethi, S, Murphy, TF. Infection in the pathogenesis and course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2355–2365.

Smolonska, J, Wijmenga, C, Postma, DS, et al. Meta-analyses on suspected chronic obstructive pulmonary disease genes: a summary of 20 years’ research. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:618–631.

Stoller, JK, Aboussouan, LS. A review of α1-antitrypsin deficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:246–259.

Tashkin, DP. Frequent exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease—a distinct phenotype? N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1183–1184.

Tuder, RM, Petrache, I. Pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:2749–2755.

van den Berge, M, ten Hacken, NH, Cohen, J, et al. Small airway disease in asthma and COPD: clinical implications. Chest. 2011;139:412–423.

Wan, ES, Silverman, EK. Genetics of COPD and emphysema. Chest. 2009;136:859–866.

Clinical Features

Barr, RG, Bluemke, DA, Ahmed, FS, et al. Percent emphysema, airflow obstruction, and impaired left ventricular filling. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:217–227.

Celli, BR, Barnes, PJ. Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 2007;29:1224–1238.

Currie, GP, Legge, JS. ABC of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Diagnosis. BMJ. 2006;332:1261–1263.

Laurin, C, Moullec, G, Bacon, SL, et al. Impact of anxiety and depression on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation risk. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:918–923.

Mannino, DM, Watt, G, Hole, D, et al. The natural history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 2006;27:627–643.

Nussbaumer-Ochsner, Y, Rabe, KF. Systemic manifestations of COPD. Chest. 2011;139:165–173.

Peinado, VI, Pizarro, S, Barberà, JA. Pulmonary vascular involvement in COPD. Chest. 2008;134:808–814.

Sapey, E, Stockley, RA. COPD exacerbations. 2: Aetiology. Thorax. 2006;61:250–258.

Treatment

Barr, RG, Bourbeau, J, Camargo, CA, et al. Tiotropium for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis. Thorax. 2006;61:854–862.

Casaburi, R, ZuWallack, R. Pulmonary rehabilitation for management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1329–1335.

Criner, GJ. Alternatives to lung transplantation: lung volume reduction for COPD. Clin Chest Med. 2011;32:379–397.

Criner, GJ, Cordova, F, Sternberg, AL, et al. The National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT). Part I: Lessons learned about emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:763–770.

Drummond, MB, Dasenbrook, EC, Pitz, MW, et al. Inhaled corticosteroids in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:2407–2416. 2008

Hansel, TT, Barnes, PJ. New drugs for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet. 2009;374:744–755.

Hays, JT, Ebbert, JO. Varenicline for tobacco dependence. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2018–2024.

Mackay, AJ, Hurst, JR. COPD exacerbations: causes, prevention, and treatment. Med Clin North Am. 2012;96:789–809.

Michalski, JM, Golden, G, Ikari, J, et al. PDE4: a novel target in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91:134–142.

Niewoehner, DE. Clinical practice. Outpatient management of severe COPD. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1407–1416.

Qaseem, A, Wilt, TJ, Weinberger, SE, et al. Diagnosis and management of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a clinical practice guideline update from the American College of Physicians, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society. American College of Physicians; American College of Chest Physicians; American Thoracic Society; European Respiratory Society. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:179–191.

Ranney, L, Melvin, C, Lux, L, et al. Systematic review: smoking cessation intervention strategies for adults and adults in special populations. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:845–856.

Ries, AL, Bauldoff, GS, Carlin, BW, et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation: joint ACCP/AACVPR evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2007;131:4S–42S.

Rodrigo, GJ, Castro-Rodriguez, JA, Plaza, V. Safety and efficacy of combined long-acting beta-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids vs long-acting beta-agonists monotherapy for stable COPD: a systematic review. Chest. 2009;136:1029–1038.

Sciurba, FC, Ernst, A, Herth, FJ, et al. A randomized study of endobronchial valves for advanced emphysema. VENT Study Research Group. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1233–1244.

Singh, S, Amin, AV, Loke, YK. Long-term use of inhaled corticosteroids and the risk of pneumonia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:219–229.

Singh, S, Loke, YK, Furberg, CD. Inhaled anticholinergics and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:1439–1450.

Stoller, JK, Panos, RJ, Krachman, S, et al. current evidence and the long-term oxygen treatment trial. Long-term Oxygen Treatment Trial Research Group. Oxygen therapy for patients with COPD. Chest. 2010;138:179–187.

Tonnesen, P, Carrozzi, L, Fagerström, KO, et al. Smoking cessation in patients with respiratory diseases: a high priority, integral component of therapy. Eur Respir J. 2007;29:390–417.

Vogelmeier, C, Hederer, B, Glaab, T, et al. Tiotropium versus salmeterol for the prevention of exacerbations of COPD. POET-COPD Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1093–1103.

Wedzicha, JA. Choice of bronchodilator therapy for patients with COPD. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1167–1168.

Wenzel, RP, Fowler, AA III, Edmond, MB. Antibiotic prevention of acute exacerbations of COPD. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:340–347.