CHAPTER 14 Cancer Genetics
Cell biology and molecular genetics have revolutionized our understanding of cancer in recent years; all cancer is a genetic disease of somatic cells because of aberrant cell division or loss of normal programmed cell death, but a small proportion is strongly predisposed by inherited germline mutations behaving as mendelian traits. However, this does not contradict our traditional understanding that, for many cancers, environmental factors are etiologically important, whereas heredity plays a lesser role. The latter is certainly true of the ‘industrial cancers’, which result from prolonged exposure to carcinogenic chemicals. Examples include cancer of the skin in tar workers, cancer of the bladder in aniline dye workers, angiosarcoma of the liver in process workers making polyvinyl chloride, and cancer of the lung (mesothelioma) in asbestos workers. Even so, for those who have been exposed to these substances and are unfortunate enough to suffer, it is possible that a significant proportion may have a genetic predisposition to the activity of the carcinogen. The link between cigarette smoking and lung cancer (as well as some other cancers) has been recognized for nearly half a century, but not all smokers develop a tobacco-related malignancy. Studies have shown that smokers with short chromosome telomeres (p. 31) appear to be at substantially greater risk for tobacco-related cancers than people with short telomeres who have never smoked, or smokers who have long telomeres, and another gene variant has been found to be more frequent in non-smokers who developed lung cancer.
Differentiation between Genetic and Environmental Factors in Cancer
Epidemiological Studies
It has long been recognized that people from lower socioeconomic groups have an increased risk of developing gastric cancer. Specific dietary irritants, such as salts and preservatives, or potential environmental agents, such as nitrates, have been suggested as possible carcinogens. Gastric cancer also shows variations in incidence in different populations, being up to eight times more common in Japanese and Chinese populations than in those of western European origin. Migration studies have shown that the risk of gastric cancer for immigrants from high-risk populations does not fall to that of the native low-risk population until two to three generations later. It has been suggested previously that this could be due to exposure to environmental factors at an early critical age. This may include early infection with Helicobacter pylori, which causes chronic gastric inflammation, and is associated with a five- to sixfold increased gastric cancer risk.
Family Studies
The frequency with which other family members develop the same cancer can provide evidence supporting a genetic contribution. The lifetime risk of developing breast cancer for a woman who lives until her mid-70s in Western Europe is at least 1 in 10. Family studies have shown that, for a woman who has a first-degree relative with breast cancer, the risk that she will also develop breast cancer is between 1.5 and 3 times the risk for the general population. The risk varies according to the age of onset in the affected family member: the earlier the age at diagnosis, the greater the risk to close relatives (p. 224).
Biochemical Factors
Biochemical factors can determine the susceptibility to environmental carcinogens. Examples include the association between slow-acetylator status and debrisoquine metabolizer status (p. 187) and a predisposition to bladder cancer, as well as glutathione S-transferase activity, which influences the risk of developing lung cancer in smokers.
Viral Factors
Subsequent studies have shown that certain viruses are tumor-forming or oncogenic in humans. A limited number of DNA viruses are associated with certain types of human tumors (Table 14.1), whereas a variety of RNA viruses, or retroviruses, cause neoplasia in animals. The study of the genetics and replicative processes of oncogenic retroviruses has revealed some of the cellular biological processes involved in carcinogenesis.
Virus Family | Type | Tumor |
---|---|---|
Papova | Papilloma (HPV) | Warts (plantar and genital), urogenital cancers (cervical, vulval, and penile), skin cancer |
Herpes | Epstein-Barr (EBV) | Burkitt lymphoma,* nasopharyngeal carcinoma, lymphomas in immunocompromised hosts |
Hepadna | Hepatitis B (HBV) | Hepatocellular carcinomaa |
* For full oncogenicity, ‘co-carcinogens’ are necessary (e.g., aflatoxin B1 in hepatitis B–associated hepatocellular carcinoma).
Retroviruses
Retroviruses have their genetic information encoded in RNA and replicate through DNA by coding for an enzyme known as reverse transcriptase (p. 17), which makes a double-stranded DNA copy of the viral RNA. This DNA intermediate integrates into the host cell genome, allowing the appropriate proteins to be manufactured, resulting in repackaging of new progeny virions.
Naturally occurring retroviruses have only the three genes necessary to ensure replication: gag, encoding the structural proteins for the core antigens; pol, coding for reverse transcriptase; and env, the gene for the glycoprotein envelope proteins (Figure 14.1). Study of the virus responsible for the transmissible tumor in chickens, the so-called Rous sarcoma virus, identified a fourth gene that results in transformation of cells in culture, a model for malignancy in vivo. This viral gene, which transforms the host cell, is known as an oncogene.
Oncogenes
Identification of Oncogenes
Oncogenes have been identified by two types of cytogenetic finding in association with certain types of leukemia and tumor in humans. These include the location of oncogenes at chromosomal translocation breakpoints, or their amplification in double-minute chromosomes or homogeneously staining regions of chromosomes (p. 212). In addition, a number of oncogenes have also been identified by the ability of tumor DNA to induce tumors in vitro by DNA transfection.
Identification of Oncogenes at Chromosomal Translocation Breakpoints
Chromosome aberrations are common in malignant cells, which often show marked variation in chromosome number and structure. Certain chromosomes seemed to be more commonly involved and it was initially thought that these changes were secondary to the transformed state rather than causal. This attitude changed when evidence suggested that chromosomal structural changes, often translocations (p. 44), resulted in rearrangements within or adjacent to proto-oncogenes. It has been found that chromosomal translocations can lead to novel chimeric genes with altered biochemical function or level of proto-oncogene activity. There are numerous examples of both types, of which chronic myeloid leukemia is an example of the former and Burkitt lymphoma an example of the latter.
Chronic myeloid leukemia
In 1960, investigators in Philadelphia were the first to describe an abnormal chromosome in white blood cells from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The abnormal chromosome, referred to as the Philadelphia, or Ph1, chromosome, is an acquired abnormality found in blood or bone marrow cells but not in other tissues from these patients. The Ph1 is a tiny chromosome that is now known to be a chromosome 22 from which long arm material has been reciprocally translocated to and from the long arm of chromosome 9 (Figure 14.2), i.e., t(9;22)(q34;q11). This chromosomal rearrangement is seen in 90% of those with CML. This translocation has been found to transfer the cellular ABL (Abelson) oncogene from chromosome 9 into a region of chromosome 22 known as the breakpoint cluster, or BCR, region, resulting in a chimeric transcript derived from both the c-ABL (70%) and the BCR genes. This results in a chimeric gene expressing a fusion protein consisting of the BCR protein at the amino end and ABL protein at the carboxy end, which is associated with transforming activity.
Burkitt lymphoma
An unusual form of neoplasia seen in children in Africa is a lymphoma that involves the jaw, known as Burkitt lymphoma, named after Dennis Burkitt, a medical missionary who first described the condition in the late 1950s. Chromosomal analysis has revealed the majority (90%) of affected children to have a translocation of the c-MYC oncogene from the long arm of chromosome 8 on to heavy (H) chain immunoglobulin locus on chromosome 14. Less commonly the MYC oncogene is translocated to regions of chromosome 2 or 22, which encode genes for the kappa (κ) and lambda (λ) light chains, respectively (pp. 196–197). As a consequence of these translocations, MYC comes under the influence of the regulatory sequences of the respective immunoglobulin gene and is overexpressed 10-fold or more.
Detection of Oncogenes by DNA Transfection Studies
The ability of DNA from a human bladder carcinoma cell line to transform a well established mouse fibroblast cell line called NIH3T3, as demonstrated by the loss of contact inhibition of the cells in culture, or what is known as DNA transfection, led to the discovery of the human sequence homologous to the ras gene of the Harvey murine sarcoma virus. The human RAS gene family consists of three closely related members, H-RAS, K-RAS, and N-RAS. The RAS proteins are closely homologous to their viral counterparts and differ from one another only near the carboxy termini. Oncogenicity of the ras proto-oncogenes has been shown to arise by acquisition of point mutations in the nucleotide sequence. In approximately 50% of colorectal cancers and 95% of pancreatic cancers, as well as in a proportion of thyroid and lung cancers, a mutation in a ras gene can be demonstrated. The RAS gene family has been shown to be the key pathway (RAS-MAPK) in neurofibromatosis type 1 (p. 298) and the Noonan/cardio-facio-cutaneous/Costello syndromes, all of which demonstrate some increased risk of tumor formation.
DNA transfection studies have also led to identification of other oncogenes that have not been demonstrated through retroviral studies. These include MET (hereditary papillary renal cell carcinoma), TRK, MAS, and RET (multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, see Tables 14.5, 14.9).
Function of Oncogenes
Cancers have characteristics that indicate, at the cellular level, loss of the normal function of oncogene products consistent with a role in the control of cellular proliferation and differentiation in the process known as signal transduction. Signal transduction is a complex multistep pathway from the cell membrane, through the cytoplasm to the nucleus, involving a variety of types of proto-oncogene product involved in positive and negative feedback loops necessary for accurate cell proliferation and differentiation (Figure 14.3).
Types of Oncogene
Growth Factors
The transition of a cell from G0 to the start of the cell cycle (p. 39) is governed by substances called growth factors. Growth factors stimulate cells to grow by binding to growth factor receptors. The best known oncogene that acts as a growth factor is the v-SIS oncogene, which encodes part of the biologically active platelet-derived growth factor B subunit. When v-SIS oncoprotein is added to the NIH 3T3 cultures, the cells are transformed, behaving like neoplastic cells; that is, their growth rate increases and they lose contact inhibition. In vivo they form tumors when injected into nude mice. Oncogene products showing homology to fibroblast growth factors include HST and INT-2, which are amplified in stomach cancers and in malignant melanomas, respectively.
Growth Factor Receptors
Many oncogenes encode proteins that form growth factor receptors, with tyrosine kinase activity possessing tyrosine kinase domains that allow cells to bypass the normal control mechanisms. More than 40 different tyrosine kinases have been identified and can be divided into two main types: those that span the cell membrane (growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases) and those located in the cytoplasm (non-receptor tyrosine kinases). Examples of tyrosine kinases include ERB-B, which encodes the epidermal growth factor receptor, and the related ERB-B2 oncogene. Mutations, rearrangements, and amplification of the ERB-B2 oncogene result in ligand-independent activation, which has been associated with cancer of the stomach, pancreas, and ovary. Mutations in KIT occur in the hereditary gastrointestinal stromal tumor syndrome. These oncogenes are not activated by translocation (as in Burkitt lymphoma) but rather by point mutations. When germline or inherited, the mutations are not lethal, nor are they sufficient by themselves to cause carcinogenesis. In the case of MET (located on chromosome 7), the papillary renal cell carcinoma tumors are trisomic for chromosome 7 and two of the three copies of MET are mutant. A ratio of one mutant to one wild-type copy of MET is not sufficient for carcinogenesis, but a 2:1 ratio is.
Intracellular Signal Transduction Factors
DNA-Binding Nuclear Proteins
The FOS, JUN, and ERB-A oncogenes encode proteins that are specific transcription factors that regulate gene expression by activating or suppressing nearby DNA sequences. The function of MYC and related genes remains uncertain but appears to be related to alterations in control of the cell cycle. The MYC and MYB oncoproteins stimulate cells to progress from the G1 into the S phase of the cell cycle (p. 39). Their overproduction prevents cells from entering a prolonged resting phase, resulting in persistent cellular proliferation.
Cell-Cycle Factors
Cancer cells can increase in number by increased growth and division, or accumulate through decreased cell death. In vivo, most cells are in a non-dividing state. Progress through the cell cycle (p. 39) is regulated at two points: one in G1 when a cell becomes committed to DNA synthesis in the S phase, and another in G2 for cell division in the M (mitosis) phase, through factors known as cyclin-dependent kinases. Abnormalities in regulation of the cell cycle through growth factors, growth factor receptors, GTPases or nuclear proteins, or loss of inhibitory factors lead to activation of the cyclin-dependent kinases, such as cyclin D1, resulting in cellular transformation with uncontrolled cell division. Alternatively, loss of the factors that lead to normal programmed cell death, a process known as apoptosis (p. 85), can result in the accumulation of cells through prolonged cell survival as a mechanism of development of some tumors. Activation of the bcl-2 oncogene through chromosomal rearrangements is associated with inhibition of apoptosis, leading to certain types of lymphoma.
Tumor Suppressor Genes
Studies carried out by Harris and colleagues in the late 1960s, which involved fusion of malignant cells with non-malignant cells in culture, resulted in the suppression of the malignant phenotype in the hybrid cells. The recurrence of the malignant phenotype with loss of certain chromosomes from the hybrid cells suggested that normal cells contain a gene(s) with tumor suppressor activity that, if lost or inactive, can lead to malignancy and was acting like a recessive trait. Such genes were initially referred to as anti-oncogenes. This term was considered inappropriate because anti-oncogenes do not oppose the action of the oncogenes and are more correctly known as tumor suppressor genes. The paradigm for our understanding of the biology of tumor suppressor genes is the eye tumor retinoblastoma. It is important to appreciate, however, that a germline mutation in a tumor suppressor gene (as with an oncogene) does not by itself provoke carcinogenesis: further somatic mutation at one or more loci is necessary and environmental factors, such as ionizing radiation, may be significant in the process. At least 20 tumor suppressor genes have been identified.
Retinoblastoma
Retinoblastoma (Rb) is a relatively rare, highly malignant, childhood cancer of the developing retinal cells of the eye that usually occurs before the age of 5 years (Figure 14.4). If diagnosed and treated at an early stage, it is associated with a good long-term outcome.
‘Two-Hit’ Hypothesis
In 1971, Knudson carried out an epidemiological study of a large number of cases of both types of Rb and advanced a ‘two-hit’ hypothesis to explain the occurrence of this rare tumor in patients with and without a positive family history. He proposed that affected individuals with a positive family history had inherited one non-functional gene that was present in all cells of the individual, known as a germline mutation, with the second gene at the same locus becoming inactivated somatically in a developing retinal cell (Figure 14.5). The occurrence of a second mutation was likely given the large number of retinal cells, explaining the autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. This would also explain the observation that in hereditary Rb the tumors were often bilateral and multifocal. In contrast, in the non-heritable or sporadic form, two inactivating somatic mutations would need to occur independently in the same retinoblast cell (see Figure 14.5), which was much less likely to occur, explaining the fact that tumors in these patients were often unilateral and unifocal, and usually occurred at a later age than in the hereditary form. Hence, although the hereditary form of Rb follows an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance, at the molecular level it is recessive because a tumor occurs only after the loss of both alleles.
It was also recognized, however, that approximately 5% of children presenting with Rb had other physical abnormalities along with developmental concerns. Detailed cytogenetic analysis of blood samples from these children revealed some of them to have an interstitial deletion involving the long arm of one of their number 13 chromosome pair. Comparison of the regions deleted revealed a common ‘smallest region of overlap’ involving the sub-band 13q14 (Figure 14.6). The detection of a specific chromosomal region involved in the etiology of these cases of Rb suggested that it could also be the locus involved in the autosomal dominant familial form of Rb. Family studies using a polymorphic enzyme, esterase D, which had previously been mapped to that region, rapidly confirmed linkage of the hereditary form of Rb to that locus.
Loss of Heterozygosity
Analyses of the DNA sequences in this region of chromosome 13 in the peripheral blood and in Rb tumor material from children who had inherited the gene for Rb showed them to have loss of an allele at the Rb locus in the tumor material, known as loss of heterozygosity (LOH), or sometimes as loss of constitutional heterozygosity. An example of this is shown in Figure 14.7, A