Aortic Stenosis

Published on 07/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Neonatal - Perinatal Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1775 times

16 Aortic Stenosis

I. CASE

A 35-year-old white woman, gravida 1, para 0+0, was referred at 23 weeks’ gestation by a maternal–fetal medicine specialist for further evaluation of aortic valve stenosis and possible fetal intervention.

A. Fetal echocardiography findings

D. Fetal management and counseling

1. Amniocentesis was done before referral and was reported to be normal, including fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for chromosome 22 microdeletion.

2. Fetal intervention.

a. Counseling and consent.

b. Preparation.

c. Equipment.

d. Cardiac catheterization.

e. Follow-up.

       (b) Hydrops fetalis.

F. Neonatal management

1. Medical.

a. Following delivery, prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) may be initiated if the stenosis is clearly more severe or if there is an additional important left heart obstructive lesion such as critical coarctation.

b. A baby with a prenatal diagnosis of probable critical aortic stenosis can develop congestive heart failure with a low cardiac output following delivery.

c. Use of prostaglandins followed by neonatal intervention is indicated if prenatally there is retrograde arch flow near term. The heart murmur (ejection systolic) may be absent, and the peripheral pulses may be poor due to the low cardiac output state. Additional anticongestive medication and inotropic support may be necessary (Fig. 16-3).

d. Critically ill newborns with severe aortic stenosis should be treated urgently because the mortality rate is high. The treatment strategy depends on:

e. Options include transcatheter valvuloplasty or closed surgical aortic valvotomy (not under cardiopulmonary bypass). Additional pathology such as aortic coarctation might need to be addressed surgically as well.

2. Surgical correction.

a. Postnatal treatment of aortic stenosis has been associated with significant mortality. However, recent advances in the palliation of infants with critical aortic stenosis with or without LV hypoplasia have improved the outlook for these patients. Criteria that influence the decision include the size of the LV (ratio to the RV and whether apex forming or not) and the size of the mitral and aortic valve orifices.

b. The treatment strategy depends on:

c. Treatment options.

II. YOUR HANDY REFERENCE

D. Clues to fetal sonographic diagnosis

The appearance of the fetal heart depends on the degree of obstruction at the aortic valve.

1. Moderate to severe valvar aortic stenosis.

a. LV might appear normal or only mildly hypertrophied.

b. Aortic valve might:

2. Critical aortic stenosis typically shows:

a. Aortic root smaller than normal for gestation.

b. Minimal antegrade flow across the aortic valve orifice or even increased outflow tract velocity due to poor ventricular function. The Doppler outflow tract velocity may be:

c. Retrograde filling of the ascending aorta via the duct (reverse arch flow) in the transverse arch, with reversal of flow across the foramen ovale (left to right).

d. Dilated and poorly contractile LV with evidence of endocardial fibroelastosis (increased echogenicity of the ventricular walls and the papillary muscles of the mitral valve).

e. Associated mitral regurgitation, giving the first clue to the diagnosis of moderate valvar aortic stenosis.

f. Restricted mitral valve opening due to either increased LV diastolic pressure or associated mitral stenosis.

3. Aortic atresia.

a. Abnormal four-chamber view: RV bigger than LV after 34 weeks’ gestation.

b. Abnormal size and function of the LV (especially if associated with mitral atresia).

c. Ascending aorta: Usually hypoplastic (variable degree of hypoplasia).

d. Absent forward flow across the aortic valve on pulsed Doppler or color flow mapping (critical aortic stenosis).

e. Retrograde filling of the ascending aorta via the duct (reverse arch flow) in the transverse arch.

f. Foramen ovale.

g. In critical aortic stenosis with VSD, the color flow mapping shows a left-to-right shunt, in contrast to bidirectional shunting in isolated VSD.

h. As seen in hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS):

4. Evaluation for postnatal surgery.

a. The RV should be carefully assessed for the suitability of the Norwood procedure or otherwise listing for heart transplant after delivery.

b. Limitations of Norwood procedure are:

F. Pathophysiology

1. Hastreiter and colleagues (1963) divided the various entities into three main groups.

a. Group 1: Patients with isolated aortic stenosis characterized by relatively well formed valves with an adequate aortic annulus and ascending aorta and without associated cardiovascular malformation.

b. Group 2: Patients with primary endocardial fibroelastosis with secondary involvement of the aortic valve.

c. Group 3: Patients with marked deformity of the aortic valve.

2. The newborn with valvar aortic stenosis usually appears healthy at birth, and the timing of presentation depends on the severity of valve obstruction.

a. Patients with mild or moderate stenosis usually present with asymptomatic murmur or ejection click on routine pediatric checkup. The diagnosis will be confirmed by echocardiography. Echocardiography provides information about:

b. In more severe cases, the infant presents with heart failure or, if the obstruction is critical, circulatory collapse in the first few days of life as the duct closes (duct-dependent circulation). This is a medical and surgical emergency.

3. The majority of cases diagnosed in fetal life are likely to represent a more severe spectrum of the disease.

image G.Fetal intervention

1. Suggested criteria for selection for fetal aortic valve balloon dilation (Fig. 16-4).

a. Large LV with persistent patency of the aortic valve.

b. Normal-appearing mitral valve.

c. Reversed flow in the aortic arch.

d. Left-to-right shunt at the atrial level.

2. Antenatal intervention has been performed for aortic valve stenosis and atresia and for defects associated with restriction or closure of the interatrial septum.

a. Valves considered to be, or likely to become, critical or likely to progress to atresia are considered for treatment.

b. To date, the number of fetuses suitable for intervention is not large.

3. The postnatal outlook for children born today with valvar stenosis has improved, but the quality of surgical programs varies and reports may be biased by patient selection, the particular interest of the surgeon, and the publication of short-term 30-day survival data.

4. Reasons for fetal intervention.

a. The early experience of cardiac interventions was poor, with few survivors. More recent experience has thus far been more encouraging and is advancing.

b. The aims in fetal intervention in either aortic or pulmonary stenosis are:

c. Fetal intervention promotes cardiac growth.

d. Fetal intervention can minimize secondary damage. There are three possible mechanisms of ventricular damage in utero.

e. A biventricular circulation provides a better quality of life than a univentricular circulation.

f. Possibility of optimizing the pulmonary vascular bed (ongoing research).

5. Timing of fetal intervention.

a. The approach at most centers is to offer an intervention soon after diagnosis in cases that fulfill the criteria, provided that adequate time has been given for counseling and parental decision making.

b. Elevated ventricular pressure and abnormal hemodynamics lead to fibrosis and calcification in the fetal ventricle. This can be documented on ultrasound and is important in the early timing of procedures intended to relieve pressure loading.

c. The largest reported series in fetal intervention for aortic valvuloplasty is from Children’s Hospital in Boston, where 33 procedures have been attempted. Twenty-six were successful and three fetuses died during the procedure. Five of the 26 successful cases have a biventricular circulation.

6. Maternal and fetal morbidity.

a. Risk to the mother.

b. Risk to the fetus.

7. Biventricular repair in congenital aortic stenosis (Boxes 16-1 and 16-2).

a. Decisions regarding surgical strategy in patients with multiple left heart obstructive or hypoplastic lesions often must be made in the newborn period and are seldom reversible.

b. Predictors of outcome of biventricular repair have not been well defined in this heterogeneous group of patients, and risk factors described for critical aortic valve stenosis have been shown to be inapplicable to patients with other left heart obstructive lesions.

c. In 1991, Rhodes stated that it was possible to predict outcome after classic valvotomy (two-ventricle-type repair) with 95% accuracy based on the following criteria:

image

Fig. 16-4 Aortic valve stenosis with post-stenotic dilation.

(Modified from Mullins CE, Mayer DC: Congenital Heart Disease: A Diagrammatic Atlas. New York, Liss, 1988.)

III. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

REFERENCES

Allan LD, Sharland GK, Milburn A, et al. Prospective diagnosis of 1,006 consecutive cases of congenital heart disease in the fetus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23(6):1452-1458.

Blaufox AD, Lai WW, Lopez L, et al. Survival in neonatal biventricular repair of left-sided cardiac obstructive lesions associated with hypoplastic left ventricle. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82(9):1138-1140.

Hammon JWJr, Lupinetti FM, Maples MD, et al. Predictors of operative mortality in critical valvular aortic stenosis presenting in infancy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988;45(5):537-540.

Hastreiter AR, Oshima M, Miller RA, et al. Congenital aortic stenosis syndrome in infancy. Circulation. 1963;28:1084-1095.

Hein S, Arnon E, Kostin S, et al. Progression from compensated hypertrophy to failure in the pressure-overloaded human heart: Structural deterioration and compensatory mechanisms. Circulation. 2003;107(7):984-991.

Hornberger LK, Sahn DJ, Kleinman CS, et al. Antenatal diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta: A multicenter experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23(2):417-423.

Hornberger LK, Weintraub RG, Pesonen E, et al. Echocardiographic study of the morphology and growth of the aortic arch in the human fetus. Observations related to the prenatal diagnosis of coarctation. Circulation. 1992;86(3):741-747.

Huhta J, Quintero RA, Suh E, Bader RS. Advances in fetal cardiac intervention. Curr Opin Paediatr. 2004;16:487-493.

McCrindle BW, Blackstone EH, Williams WG, et al. Are outcomes of surgical versus transcatheter balloon valvotomy equivalent in neonatal critical aortic stenosis? Circulation. 2001;104(12 Suppl 1):I152-I158.

Ovaert C, Qureshi SA, Rosenthal E, et al. Growth of the right ventricle after successful transcatheter pulmonary valvotomy in neonates and infants with pulmonary atresia and intact ventricular septum. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115:1055-1062.

Rasanen J, Huhta JC, Weiner S, et al. Fetal branch pulmonary arterial vascular impedance during the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1441-1449.

Rhodes LA, Colan SD, Perry SB, et al. Predictors of survival in neonates with critical aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1991;84(6):2325-2335. Erratum in Circulation 92(7):2005, 1995.

Serraf A, Piot JD, Bonnet N, et al. Biventricular repair approach in ducto-dependent neonates with hypoplastic but morphologically normal left ventricle. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33(3):827-834.

Tulzer G, Arzt W, Franklin RC, et al. Fetal pulmonary valvoplasty for critical pulmonary stenosis with intact septum. Lancet. 2002;360(9345):1567-1568.

Tworetzky W, Wilkins-Haug L, Jennings RW, et al. Balloon dilation of severe aortic stenosis in the fetus: Potential for prevention of hypoplastic left heart syndrome: Candidate selection, technique, and results of successful intervention. Circulation. 2004;110:2125-2131.

Van Son JA, Falk V, Schneider P, et al. Repair of coarctation of the aorta in neonates and young infants. J Card Surg. 1997;12(3):139-146.

Ziemer G, Jonas RA, Perry SB, et al. Surgery for coarctation of the aorta in the neonate. Circulation. 1986;74(3 Pt 2):I25-131.