Anesthesia in austere environments

Published on 07/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 1 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 1746 times

Anesthesia in austere environments

Craig C. McFarland, MD and C. George Merridew, MBBS, FANCZA

For many anesthesia providers, the delivery of an anesthetic in an austere environment implies that the provider has volunteered for a humanitarian mission in a developing country or is in the military and practicing in field conditions—synonymous with an austere environment. However, any time a situation arises in which medical capability is significantly below standards that are typically available in developed countries, the provider is indeed practicing in an austere environment. Such austere environments include the following:

Graduates of Western anesthesia training programs can cope well in such situations, provided that they understand the basic requisites of disaster management and the pharmacology and physiology of anesthesia. The latter allows the provider to choose among several options for delivery of a safe anesthetic—general anesthesia using a parenteral versus an inhalation technique or a regional anesthetic.

Basic principles

The austere environment is characterized by a relative lack of medical supplies, supplemental O2 electricity, trained health care personnel, or evacuation options. Each of these deficiencies requires proper planning to make medical care in an austere environment successful. When resupply is not a reliable option, a medical team may be forced to carry all of their supplies with them. This puts a premium on reusable items and on equipment with a low weight and a small footprint.

A lack of trained personnel or limited evacuation options make proper patient selection and selection of the appropriate surgical procedure crucial. When patients present for elective operations, care must be taken to choose the patients in whom the most benefit is likely to be obtained with the least risk. On the other hand, when patients present for emergent operations, a surgical course must be chosen that is least likely to outstrip the medical team’s capability for perioperative care or to degrade the medical team’s ability to care for subsequent patients. For example, an extremity mangled by a landmine explosion is better amputated if the care, equipment, and time required for limb salvage and rehabilitation are not available. The process of selecting patients for surgery, or for selecting the proper surgical treatment for patients, requires collaboration among the anesthesia provider, the surgeon, and the rest of the medical team. In an austere environment, cesarean sections and amputations would be commonly performed, whereas cardiac or neurosurgical procedures would be rare (Table 179-1).

Table 179-1

Surgical Procedures in an Austere Environment

Common Field Operations Uncommon Field Operations
Abscess incision and drainage
Fasciotomy
Amputations
Débridement of wounds or burns
External fixation of fractures
Emergency laparotomy
Emergency caesarean section
Evacuation of retained placenta
Procedures requiring invasive monitoring
Procedures requiring any postoperative intensive care
Internal fixation of fractures
Laparoscopy, endoscopy, arthroscopy
Subspecialty surgery
Note: Militaries from developed countries may have good ICU and evacuation capabilities

ICU, Intensive care unit.

Having a limited supply of supplemental O2 or electricity places a premium on optimal use of anesthetic techniques that permit spontaneous ventilation, preserve hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, and minimally depress consciousness. If a regional anesthesia technique is appropriate for the surgical procedure, it meets these criteria. If general anesthesia is required, one must weigh the risks and benefits of a parenteral (intramuscular versus a total intravenous anesthetic) versus an inhalation technique.

Options for anesthesia

Regional anesthesia

If the afferent pathways from the surgical site can be blocked with local anesthetic agents, regional anesthesia is optimal for the austere environment. Depending upon the surgical site, this may entail a field block, a peripheral nerve or nerve plexus block, a paravertebral block, or a neuraxial technique. Many of these blocks were performed historically and can still be performed in an austere environment by experienced providers using anatomic landmarks with or without the aid of a nerve stimulator. The main disadvantages of regional anesthesia are that it is not sufficient for all surgical procedures, its success is dependent upon the experience of the practitioner, and it can be time consuming to perform and resource intensive. Additionally, a spinal hematoma, although very rare, is not easily diagnosed or treated in the austere environment; on the other hand, advantages include maintenance of consciousness and of oropharyngeal reflexes and superior postoperative pain control.

General anesthesia

Parenteral anesthesia

Ketamine is perhaps the most useful anesthetic drug in the austere environment. It can be administered orally, intramuscularly, or intravenously and can be used alone or as an adjunct to other drugs. Because ketamine provides hypnosis, analgesia, and amnesia, it can be used as a total anesthetic. Ketamine maintains or even increases skeletal muscle tone, an impediment for the surgeon undertaking caesarean section with spontaneous ventilation. In comparison with other systemic anesthetic agents, at a given degree of analgesia, ketamine maintains better hemodynamics, airway control, and spontaneous ventilation. These qualities make ketamine indispensable to the anesthesia provider in an austere environment. Qualities to be aware of include the dose-dependent, although not ubiquitous, psychotomimetic effects, a tendency to promote excessive salivation, and a relative contraindication in patients with ocular and brain injuries.

Total intravenous anesthesia

Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) can be used for analgesia or sedation or as an intraoperative anesthetic. It is frequently administered as a mixture of propofol, an opioid, ketamine, and often a neuromuscular blocking drug. Such mixtures have the advantage of not requiring an anesthesia machine, an infusion pump, electricity, or batteries, resulting in a small logistical footprint. Depending upon the particular mixture of agents, TIVA may take advantage of the benefits of ketamine, conferring a decreased risk of redistribution hypothermia compared with inhalation anesthetic agents, and may not inhibit hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction as much as does TIVA without the addition of ketamine. An example of a TIVA recipe is found in Box 179-1. Disadvantages of TIVA include the facts that providing TIVA requires adequate intravenous access and that many anesthesia providers are unfamiliar with providing TIVA.

Inhalation anesthesia

Inhalation anesthesia is considered by some to have the largest logistical footprint, especially if supplemental O2 is used. Some British and Australasian anesthesia providers consider inhalation anesthesia delivered with a drawover vaporizer to be the preferred technique for use in an austere environment. Many anesthesia providers in the United States, however, may not be familiar with a drawover vaporizer, such as the Ohmeda Universal Portable Anesthesia Complete (Figure 179-1), but, given the opportunity, most providers would find it easy to set up and use, and very reliable. This device is designed to deliver inhalation agents to a spontaneously ventilating patient but can be combined with a portable ventilator, such as the Uni-Vent Eagle 754 (Impact Instrumentation, Inc.; West Caldwell, NJ). When using this technique, the anesthesia provider should select patients for whom supplemental O2 would not be necessary unless a source of O2 is readily available.

Other drawover vaporizers in current use include the Oxford Miniature Vaporiser (OMV), the Epstein Macintosh Oxford (EMO) both from Penlon, UK), the Diamedica Drawover Vaporiser (DDOV in the Glostavent anesthesia machine; Diamedica, UK), and the vaporizer of the Universal Anesthesia Machine (UAM; Gradian Health Systems LLC, NYNY). The latter two machines include a ventilator (basic intermittent positive pressure ventilation with or without positive end expiratory pressure), compressor and O2 concentrator and can use partial rebreathing circuits or drawover. They are designed for missionary and other relatively fixed developing world environments with electrical generators.

Final thoughts

In developing countries, tragically, many children are victims of injury, burns, or surgical illness. Anesthesia providers who do not typically care for children can take comfort in knowing that their training should allow them to function well in an austere environment when treating children who require care. When new to the austere environment, the medical team should begin by treating healthier patients first while the team adjusts to its surroundings and to one another and develops experience and confidence with the anesthetic techniques that will be used most often. Additional tips for performing pediatric anesthesia in developing countries are listed in Box 179-2.

Obstetric anaesthesia is inevitable regardless of the main mission, and patients do not present for normal delivery. The obstetric surgery has basic indications: severe antepartum bleeding, prolonged obstructed labour, pre-eclampsia or eclampsia. Often the foetus is dead and the mother is at risk of dying. Retained placenta cases come late, with bleeding and definite septicaemia.