Tumors of the Thoracic Spine

Published on 11/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Orthopaedics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 4920 times

46 Tumors of the Thoracic Spine

Introduction

Nearly 1.4 million new cases of cancer are diagnosed in the United States per year.1 In a majority of the approximately 724,000 cancer-related deaths per year, patients ultimately succumb to complications related to metastatic disease. Approximately 30% to 90% of cancer patients will have evidence of metastases to the spinal column at autopsy, and 5% to 10% of cancer patients develop symptomatic metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), an oncologic emergency.1 There are approximately 25,000 cases of symptomatic MESCC in the united states each year.1 The thoracic spine is the most common site of metastatic disease involvement in the vertebral column and the most common site of primary vertebral column tumors. Because symptomatic degenerative disease is less common in the thoracic spine relative to the cervical or lumbar spine, thoracic region pain in a middle-aged or elderly patient should be considered a red flag symptom. Imaging should be considered expeditiously, particularly if the patient has a history of primary cancer. Nonetheless, delay in the diagnosis of thoracic region tumors is common. Surgical intervention for thoracic spinal cord and spinal column neoplasms continues to present significant challenges. Lesions in the thoracic spine can be subdivided into four major categories: metastatic disease, intradural extramedullary tumors, intramedullary spinal cord tumors, and primary neoplasms involving skeletal elements.

Metastatic Tumors

Approximately 70% of metastatic disease to the vertebral column involves the thoracic spine, making it the most common site of spinal metastases.2 As increased survival due to improved treatment strategies for primary neoplasms becomes a trend, the incidence of bone metastases to the spine will also increase. The unique venous drainage of visceral organs through the Batson plexus is one explanation for this anatomical phenomenon, along with the close proximity of the thoracic spine to thoracic and abdominal viscera.2 Eighty percent of metastases involve the vertebral body, while 20% involve the posterior elements.2 Of the four subtypes of tumors of the thoracic spine, metastatic tumors are by far the most common. Cancers that have a propensity to spread to the thoracic spine include breast, lung, leukemia/lymphoma, prostate, and renal cell.2 Surgical management requires consideration of the need for decompression of the neural elements, for restoration of spinal stability, and for pain relief. With tumors of breast, prostate, or renal origin, aggressive resection is indicated, as this has been shown to have a favorable impact on ambulatory function and may have a favorable impact on survival.3

Intradural Extramedullary Tumors

Intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumors account for two thirds of intradural spinal tumors.4 The most common IDEM tumors of the thoracic spine are meningiomas, neurofibromas and schwannomas, which account for over 80% of tumors in this location.5 Meningiomas arise from arachnoid cap cells; 75% of spinal meningiomas are contained within the thoracic spine, and they show a strong predilection for women (80%).5 Meningiomas have a benign biological behavior in the spinal column and management should be directed toward gross total resection to achieve a cure. This may not be feasible with anteriorly situated, calcified tumors, and the risk of neurological injury must be weighed against the indolent growth rates usually observed after subtotal resection. Radiotherapy is thus reserved for recurrent tumors that cannot be completely resected.

Schwannomas arise from Schwann cells of the posterior nerve roots and are most common in the thoracic and upper lumbar spine. The location, in 13% of cases, may be both extradural and intradural. Spinal schwannomas have an increased frequency in certain genetic disorders, such as neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2).

Neurofibromas of spinal nerve root origin may be seen sporadically or in patients with neurofibromatosis. These tumors will have an extradural component in 30% of cases.5 The surgical goal in the treatment of thoracic schwannomas and neurofibromas is complete surgical resection. If the tumor cannot be separated from the nerve root of origin, then sacrifice of that root may be necessary. Fortunately, this is usually of little consequence in the thoracic spine.

IDEM tumors of the thoracic spine most often manifest with long tract signs, and the corticospinal tracts are particularly vulnerable. Stiffness and muscle fatigue are often primary signs with spasticity frequently occurring secondarily. In patients presenting with myelopathy, surgical indications are straightforward. It is the incidentally found meningioma or nerve sheath tumor that may present a dilemma. Patient age, medical comorbidities, and tumor growth observed with serial imaging help direct the necessity and timing of surgical intervention.

Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors

Intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCTs) make up 2% to 8.5% of all central nervous system(CNS) tumors and approximately one third of primary spinal column tumors.6 Approximately 90% are of glial origin.4 The major types observed in the thoracic spine are astrocytomas and ependymomas, which are seen with almost equal frequency in adults. Hemangioblastomas, which are less commonly observed, may be sporadic or a part of von Hippel-Lindau syndrome. Astrocytomas are most often seen at the cervicothoracic junction and in the lower thoracic spinal cord. In adults, ependymomas are the most common IMSCT. However, the majority of these occur in the cervical spine or arise from the filum terminale (myxopapillary ependymoma). Treatment of ependymomas is focused on gross total resection. Patients who have incompletely-removed tumors should be considered for re-resection or followed closely with serial imaging and considered for reoperation if growth is documented. Radiation therapy is often reserved for incomplete resection after reoperation. Astrocytomas in adults tend to be infiltrative and blend imperceptibly with the spinal cord at the margins of the tumor. For this reason, total removal may not be possible. Most commonly, infiltrative tumors treated with subtotal resection will undergo radiation therapy. For high-grade infiltrative lesions, biopsy or subtotal resection is also often followed by radiation therapy. For some low-grade lesions treated with subtotal resection, postoperative radiation therapy remains controversial.6

Pain is the most common presentation of IMSCT in the thoracic spine; it usually localizes to the level of the tumor and is either regional back pain or radicular.4 Up to one third of patients may also experience sensory or motor complaints and spasticity. The most common sign of an IMSCT within the thoracic spine is a mild scoliosis with spasticity and sensory disturbance.6 Until recently, it was believed that posterior decompression and radiation therapy were the limits of therapy, but aggressive gross total resection, with the aid of microsurgical tools and intraoperative monitoring, has been shown to be safe and to improve functional recovery and reduce tumor recurrence.

Primary Vertebral Column Tumors

Primary tumors of the vertebral column are rare, making up less than 10% of all tumors involving the spinal column.7 It should be emphasized that when patients present with a vertebral column mass in the absence of impending neurological compromise, minimally invasive, image-guided biopsy should be performed prior to definitive treatment planning. Many of the primary neoplasms of the thoracic spinal column are best treated via radical en bloc surgical resection. These types of surgical approaches require careful and detailed preoperative surgical planning by an experienced surgical team. Therefore, knowing the tumor histology up front is critical to the surgical plan.

Primary osseous tumors can be divided into three categories: benign, benign but locally aggressive, and malignant. Benign tumors include hemangiomas, osteoid osteomas/osteoblastomas, chondroma/osteochondromas, aneurysmal bone cysts, and eosinophilic granulomas. Hemangiomas are the most common primary neoplasm affecting the thoracic spine and have been seen in approximately 11% of all postmortem examinations.7 Infrequently, hemangiomas can behave in an atypical or locally aggressive fashion and can cause spinal cord compression. In this situation, aggressive surgical resection is advocated. Giant cell tumors have a variable biological behavior and may act in a locally aggressive fashion. Because of this, the authors often recommend radical en bloc excision of tumors exhibiting this pathology and will strongly consider adjuvant radiation therapy postoperatively. Chordomas occurring in the thoracic spine are almost uniformly locally aggressive and recurrences are common after intralesional resection, including gross total resection. Similarly, we recommend radical en bloc resection techniques for thoracic chordomas. Chemotherapy protocols for chordomas have not been promising to date, nor have conventional radiation therapy modalities. Proton beam irradiation therapy has been shown to be the most promising radiation modality and patients are evaluated postoperatively for this modality on an individual basis. However, it is our belief that the most effective treatment modality for achieving long term local disease control is aggressive en bloc resection with negative margins, including resection of the biopsy tract if possible. Proton beam irradiation should not be relied on for cases where gross total resection cannot be achieved. However, it may be employed even in cases of en bloc resection with negative margins.

Malignant types include plasmacytomas, chondrosarcomas, and osteosarcomas. Plasmacytomas make up nearly 30% of all primary tumors and have a propensity to occur in the thoracic spine.8 While these tumors are radiation-sensitive lesions, surgery may be necessary for failure of radiation therapy, acute neurological decline from spinal cord compression, and overt instability of the spinal column. Sarcomas present a specific treatment challenge. Biopsy is recommended to assess the specific histology and grade. Systemic workup for metastases is important prior to embarking on treatment. High-grade lesions that are large or those tumors associated with metastatic disease may be treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocols to shrink the local disease and address metatstatic disease prior to surgical resection. En bloc resection is the technique that gives the patient the best opportunity for a longer-term survival with these tumor types, particularly when metastatic disease is not present.

Thoracic spinal column neoplasms present a host of treatment challenges. Knowing the tumor histology through a biopsy is ideal prior to embarking on a formal surgical plan. In the setting of impending neurological decline, a biopsy may not be possible and urgent decompression may be necessary. However, surgical planning is best determined when the histology, systemic disease status, patient age, and medical comorbidities are known.

Basic Science

Research related to the molecular biology and genetics of specific tumor types that affect the spinal column either as primary or metastatic lesions is beyond the scope of this text. However, several animal models of spinal column neoplasia and the translational research related to these animal models are worth discussion. Recently, animal models for metastatic disease to the spine and intramedullary spinal cord gliomas have been developed that will allow for more rigorous preclinical analysis of novel therapies. Mantha et al have established a reproducible model of metastatic breast adenocarcinoma to the vertebral column in rats.9 The establishment of this model represents the first of its kind and has allowed for the study of multiple treatment modalities focused on treating spinal metastatic disease, including surgery, radiation therapy, and the novel use of locally delivered chemotherapeutic agents.

Using the metastatic model developed by Mantha et al, Bagley et al have shown that radiation reliably delays paraparesis and death in this model, as does local delivery of paclitaxel.10,11 The combination of these two modalities has been shown to be more effective than either treatment alone. 11 Additionally, Gok et al. have shown that the combination of decompressive surgery, local chemotherapy, and radiation has the most profound results in terms of preservation of neurological function and prolongation of survival in this animal model with of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.12 The hope is that this experimental data may translate into useful clinical trials designed to improve neurological morbidity and, potentially, survival in patients with MESCC due to metastatic breast cancer and other tumor histologies.

Pennant et al. have examined the efficacy of microsurgical excision in a rat model of intramedullary spinal cord tumor. The established model mimics the behavior of IMSCTS, both functionally and histopathologically.13 Following tumor implantation, animals were randomized into a treatment group (microsurgical resection) or to no treatment. The animals that underwent resection had a significant delay in the onset of functional paraplegia as compared to the controls and these results were highly reproducible. This new model allows for the study of new treatment options for high-grade intramedullary tumors.

Schuster et al have developed a novel model of spine metastasis using human osteoblasts implanted in immune incompetent (SCID) mice that has shown to be highly reproducible.14 This model allows for the study of bone-tumor interaction in metastatic disease, as well as the basic biology of bone metastases. Chordoma models have been difficult to establish, but through human cell culture, nude animal models have been conceptualized. Laboratory study of this extremely aggressive local tumor is much needed given the limited options for treatment outside of aggressive radical resection.

Clinical Practice Guidelines

Surgical intervention has a clear and proven role in the treatment of patients with metastatic disease involving the thoracic spine that results in spinal cord compression. Surgical treatment, followed by radiation therapy, not only extends ambulatory status but also results in a trend toward longer survival and reduces the need for steroids and pain medications.3

The indications for surgical intervention include the need to establish a diagnosis, the treatment of spinal instability, and the restoration or preservation of neurological function in the setting of epidural spinal cord compression. Additional indications include the treatment of radioresistant tumors, and the treatment of tumor recurrence following radiation therapy or the treatment of neurological decline during radiation therapy. A systemic approach for treatment of thoracic metastases has been developed and may aid in designing the optimal surgical strategy.15 The mnemonic “MAPS” stands for (1) method of resection; (2) anatomy of spinal disease; (3) patient’s level of fitness; and (4) stabilization.

Surgical approaches to the spine can be generally categorized as either anterior, posterior, or combined. Posterior approaches may include laminectomy alone, or laminectomy combined with transpedicular, costotransversectomy, or lateral extracavitary resection techniques and stabilization. Anterior approaches in the upper thoracic spine include cervicothoracic and trap door exposure. Anterior access to the lower thoracic spine can be accomplished by a thoracotomy or thoracoabdominal approach.

The vascular anatomy is particularly important when designing an anterior approach as well as the tumor laterality. For example, above T6 or T7 a right-sided thoracotomy is preferred, because the aortic arch often complicates a left-sided approach to the mid/upper thoracic spine. Similarly, tumors situated between T1 and T4 are a unique challenge from the perspective of an anterior approach. With metastatic lesions in the upper thoracic spine, the authors will often consider a posterior approach. If anterior column resection or reconstruction is necessary, it is often done with a transpedicular, costotransversectomy, or lateral extracavitary technique.

The method of resection may be en bloc (wide or marginal) or intralesional resection of various degrees ranging from open biopsy to gross total resection. En bloc resection may be considered with a solitary spinal metastatic lesion, in the absence of visceral metastatic disease and with a favorable histological tumor type (breast, prostate, renal cell carcinoma, thyroid carcinoma). In addition, the feasibility of such an approach should be considered with respect to surgical staging and medical fitness of the patient. En bloc spondylectomy in the thoracic spine may be performed through an all-posterior approach or a combined posterior approach first and a second staged anterior approach. En bloc spondylectomy through a posterior-only approach requires laminectomy above and below the vertebral segment of interest. Then while protecting the spinal cord and nerve roots, the pedicles are cut at the junction with the vertebral body using a chisel or saw. This allows the posterior elements to be removed in one piece after the facets are disrupted on each side. A wide costotransversectomy is performed on each side to allow for dissection around the entire vertebral body, so that the aorta and venous structures may be dissected off of the spinal column. Radical discectomies are performed above and below the segment of interest to mobilize the entire vertebral body. With the pleura completely exposed, the vertebral body may be rotated, carefully translated posteriorly around the side of the spinal cord, and resected in one piece. Staged posterior followed by anterior en bloc spondylectomy is similar, but after the radical discectomies, a Silastic sheath is placed between the posterior vertebral body and the anterior dura. Subsequent staged thoracotomy is performed to remove the mobilized vertebral segment in one piece. Special care is taken not to injure the anterior vasculature. The spinal cord is relatively protected with this technique because the Silastic sheath was placed during the first stage to clearly identify the plane between the spinal cord dura and the vertebral body.

The majority of metastases within the thoracic spinal column will affect the vertebral body, which favors an anterior approach. A disease-directed approach to the thoracic spine provides the most direct access for resection of tumors contained within the vertebral body and allows for the most effective reconstruction of the anterior aspects of the weight-bearing spine. A consideration of patient fitness is essential in the choice of surgical approach. Previously irradiated tissue increases the risk of wound dehiscence and thus may favor an anterior approach. Additionally, the possibility of high intraoperative blood loss, nutritional depletion, corticosteroid use, advanced age, comorbidity, and paraparesis are significant risk factors that should be considered.

Though the thoracic spine is well supported by the rib cage, additional stabilization should be considered in the case of significant disease or removal of the vertebral bodies, facet joints or pedicles. Anterior stabilization is always indicated following vertebrectomy, and the need for additional posterior stabilization should be considered. Supplementary posterior stabilization following vertebrectomy and vertebral body reconstruction might be considered in a variety of situations, including the case of a posterolateral approach, in patients with a significant kyphosis or deformity, in patients with junctional zone disease, significant adjacent chest wall reconstruction, a greater than two-level corpectomy, spondylectomy, or in the case of poor bone quality. The authors do not recommend laminectomy alone for the treatment of thoracic tumors, except in the setting of IMSCTs. Often laminoplasty is an attractive option for IMSCTs. Typically with posterior reconstruction for metastatic tumors, we will place pedicle screws two to three levels above and two or three levels below the area of the laminectomy, particularly if a posterior approach is used for anterior column reconstruction.

Finally, metastatic spread from lymphomas, multiple myeloma, and small cell lung carcinoma represent tumors that are particularly radiosensitive; therefore radiation modalities may be considered as a first-line treatment and the need for surgery may be obviated or withheld until radiotherapy has been implemented and failed.

Clinical Case Examples

Case 1: Posterolateral Approach for Metastatic Spine Disease

Patient Presentation

A 70-year-old female with a history of diabetes and osteoarthritis of the hips presented to an outside emergency department with shortness of breath and dyspnea. Work-up included a chest CT scan and an incidental lesion was found in the T3 vertebral body. Formal imaging of the spine was done via a dedicated MRI and CT scan. Initially the lesion was thought to represent metastatic disease. The patient initially had no neurological symptoms and the lesion was felt to be incidentally found. A systemic metastatic work-up was negative. Given the lack of neurological symptoms despite evidence of epidural spinal cord compression on the MRI scan, CT-guided biopsy was recommended. The results were nondiagnostic on two occasions despite thorough review by an experienced neuropathologist. The pathology sample did show rare plasma cells, but serum protein electrophoresis and urine protein electrophoresis were negative. The patient was referred to our institution for further care when she began to develop mild lower extremity weakness, subtle gait difficulty, lower extremity paresthesias, and long tract findings on exam.

MRI of the thoracic spine and CT scan of the thoracic spine are shown in Figure 46-1. We felt that despite the negative biopsy, the imaging was most characteristic of an atypical vertebral hemangioma with epidural spinal cord compression. Imaging features that support this diagnosis include the appearance of vascular channels on the MRI and the “polka-dot” appearance with vascular channels also present on the CT scan. Also included in the differential diagnosis was plasmacytoma/multiple myeloma.

Because of impending neurological deterioration and the lack of a diagnosis, a surgical approach was recommended. Given the possibility of a highly vascular lesion such as a vertebral hemangioma, preoperative embolization by an interventional neuroradiologist was recommended and successfully carried out through glue embolization via the right T3 intercostal artery feeding an arteriovenous fistula to the T3 vertebral body and tumor blush. The following day the patient was taken to surgery.

Approaches to this lesion were discussed, with several considerations in mind. First, the epidural compression was noted to occur from an anterolateral direction at one segment, making an anterior approach appealing. However, at the T3 level, anterior approaches are more complicated and involve splitting the sternum to gain access to this location and working around the great vessels. We recommended a posterolateral approach to allow for decompression, resection of tumor, and both anterior column and posterior reconstruction.

Surgical Technique

With the patient in a prone position on the Jackson table with neurological monitoring, T2-T4 laminectomies, T3 costotransversectomy, transpedicular decompression of the spinal canal, and T3 corpectomy with intralesional resection of the tumor were performed. Reconstruction was achieved with an expandable cage placed from T2 to T4 and supplemented with pedicle screw instrumentation extending from T1 to T9. An intraoperative photo is shown in Figure 46-2. We elected to extend the construct multiple levels below the site of tumor resection because we did not want to stop our instrumentation just above or at the site of the apex of the thoracic kyphosis for fear of inferior construct failure. Bone grafting was performed with allograft and demineralized bone matrix. In the setting of potential malignant disease affecting the bone marrow and with spinal tumor surgery in general, we tend to avoid the use of autograft bone or BMP.

Postoperative Course

The patient tolerated the procedure well and spent one night in the neuro intensive care unit. The patient had no new neurological deficits. Postoperative CT scan demonstrating the cage reconstruction and pedicle screw instrumentation is shown in Figure 46-3. Pathological analysis confirmed the tumor to be a hemangioma. The patient was discharged to rehab and is being followed with serial imaging and clinical evaluation to assess for tumor recurrence. However, given the benign nature of the histopathology despite aggressive local behavior, it is suspected that the patient is cured of her disease, and adjuvant therapy has not been recommended.

Case 2: Anterior Approach

Patient Presentation

A 61-year-old male with a history of pheochromocytoma presented with progressive midthoracic pain. Nineteen years prior to presentation the patient was diagnosed with a pheochromocytoma and was treated successfully with left adrenalectomy. Six years prior to presentation the patient developed midthoracic region pain and was treated conservatively with physical therapy and NSAIDs. The patient developed myelopathic signs and symptoms to include lower extremity weakness and gait dysfunction. And an MRI of the thoracic spine disclosed a lesion at T5 with significant epidural spinal cord compression. He was then treated with radiation therapy and his pain and neurological dysfunction improved. Several years following the radiation therapy, the patient developed worsening and severe midthoracic pain that had a mechanical component to it. Associated symptoms included bilateral thoracic radicular pain and subjective lower extremity weakness. He described dragging his feet, but denied sphincter dysfunction. On exam he had 4/5 strength of the iliopsoas and dorsiflexors bilaterally. He was also noted to be hyperreflexic in his lower extremities. MRI of the thoracic spine (Figure 46-4) showed partial collapse of the T5 vertebral body with kyphosis and epidural spinal cord compression. T2 signal change was noted in the spinal cord at this level, consistent with myelomalacia. Surgery was recommended, given evidence of spinal cord compression, clinical myelopathy, anterior vertebral column compromise and kyphosis. An all-posterior approach with transpedicular corpectomy and reconstruction of the anterior column was considered. However, it was felt that an anterior approach would be the best approach to resect the anterior compressive tumor, correct the kyphosis, and reconstruct the anterior column without having to perform a multilevel instrumented fusion that would be required with an all-posterior approach.

Case 3: Anterior/-Posterior Combined Approach

Patient Presentation

A 52-year-old male with a history of hypertension presented with a 1-year history of progressive right-sided abdominal and flank region pain. His pain subsequently progressed to include axial back pain that was most severe at night when recumbent in bed. A CT scan (Figure 46-7) of the thoracic spine revealed a lytic/destructive lesion at T9-T10 with associated large paraspinal posterior pleural-based mass on the right side. MRI (Figure 46-8) disclosed significant epidural extension and spinal cord compression. The patient denied lower extremity sensory changes, weakness, or bowel or bladder dysfunction. He had no history of systemic cancer. Neurological exam was significant for 5/5 strength in his lower extremities, and a normal sensory exam except for dermatomal sensory loss in the right T9-T10 location. He was also noted to have hyperreflexia in his lower extremities and two to three beats of bilateral ankle clonus. Given the prolonged history, it was felt that this lesion might represent a relatively slow-growing histopathological entity. Considerations were sarcoma, plasmacytoma/multiple myeloma, and possibly metastatic carcinoma. Given his preserved motor function, an expedited CT-guided biopsy of the lesion was recommended. The pathology proved the lesion to be a plasmacytoma/multiple myeloma. Further staging disclosed this to be stage 1A IgG kappa multiple myeloma. Despite the lytic appearance of this tumor, the patient initially did not have mechanical pain and the anterior column height was preserved without pathological fracture or deformity. Given the high radiation sensitivity of multiple myeloma, radiation therapy was recommended with close follow-up. The patient failed to respond to radiation therapy and developed mild gait dysfunction. Surgical resection was recommended. The lack of response to radiation called into question the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Concomitant thoracotomy and posterior approach was planned. In any situation when an anterior approach is planned and a greater than 1 level corpectomy is performed, we recommend supplemental posterior stabilization. In this case, we felt as well that a combined posterior approach would also assist with the tumor resection and decompression.

Discussion

Metasatic tumors are the most common neoplasms affecting the thoracic spine. Based on the work of Patchell et al surgery followed by radiation therapy has replaced radiation therapy alone as the gold standard for treatment of MESCC. Extremely radiation-sensitive tumors include small cell lung carcinoma, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. For these lesions, radiation therapy may still be employed as a first-line treatment modality for MESCC. The surgical approach may be anterior, posterior, or combined anterior/posterior. En bloc spondylectomy may be employed specifically for certain locally aggressive primary spinal column neoplasms. Prior to embarking on treatment, it is important to know the tumor histology. Therefore, CT-guided biopsy is recommended in patients who have stable or preserved neurological function. Tumor history, tumor location, anatomy of spinal disease, extent of systemic disease/medical comorbidities, and vertebral column compromise are factors that dictate the surgical approach. Thoracic spinal column neoplasms require reconstruction with instrumentation, with the exception of IMSCTs and some IDEM tumors. The clinical goals of surgery for thoracic spinal column neoplasms include local disease control, preservation or restoration of neurological function, stabilization of the spinal column, and pain control.

Case 4: En Bloc

Patient Presentation

A 67-year-old male with a history of prostate cancer treated with resection and thought to be in remission presented with upper lumbar/lower thoracic and right paraspinal pain. Associated symptoms included local numbness and paresthesias and more recent numbness and paresthesias in his feet. An MRI of the thoracic and lumbar spine (Figure 46-10) was performed with and without contrast as well as plain films. The plain films did not demonstrate evidence of bony changes; however, MRI showed a T2-hyperintense and contrast-enhancing lesion at T10 with epidural extension and spinal cord compression. Although the patient had some mild myelopathic signs on exam (hypereflexia), his motor exam was normal and his gait and sphincter function were both normal. The differential diagnosis included chordoma, given the T2 hyperintensity that is typical of this lesion. Also included on the list was metastatic disease, with prostate being the highest possibility on the list given his previous history. Because chordoma was on the list, representing a locally aggressive tumor that is rarely cured with intralesional resection alone, a CT-guided biopsy was recommended through a posterior approach to confirm the pathology prior to recommending further treatment. The report confirmed a chordoma. An en bloc surgical resection was recommended. An all-posterior approach was recommended with the caveat that if en bloc resection could not be achieved in this fashion, the posterior resection of the posterior elements at T10 would be followed by a thoracotomy with anterior en bloc vertebral body resection.

Surgical Technique

The patient was positioned prone on the Jackson table. The posterior spine was exposed from T7 to T12. The surgical plan was to stop the construct at T12/the thoracolumbar (TL) junction. Although stopping a construct at a junctional level may not be ideal, the authors feel that when this is done with a construct ending on the superior side of the TL junction, it is better tolerated than ending on the inferior side of the TL junction. However, there is no solid data to support this clinical belief. We also felt that ending at T7 was high enough above the apex of the patient’s thoracic kyphosis, which we estimated to be at T8-9 or T9-10 based on the imaging. Pedicle screws were therefore placed at T7-T9 and T11-T12 bilaterally. Laminectomies at T9 and T11 were subsequently fashioned. Two Tomita saws were then placed between the lamina of T10 and the dura at the junction with the facet joint. Using the Tomita saws, the spinous process and bilateral lamina of T10 were removed in en bloc fashion. Using silk ligatures to prevent a CSF leak, the bilateral T9 and T10 nerve roots were ligated proximal to the dorsal root ganglion. The nerve roots typically have to be sectioned at one or two levels to deliver the vertebral body posteriorly in an en bloc spondylectomy. It is felt that sectioning the roots proximal to the dorsal root ganglion decreases the possibility of postoperative neuropathic radicular pain. The thecal sac was carefully dissected from the anterolaterally situated epidural tumor. The paraspinal muscles were dissected off of the rib cage and retracted medially with Penrose drains. The bilateral T10 ribs were then resected from 1 cm distal to the costotransverse junction to 5 cm distal to that point. The pleura was opened and a chest spreader was placed, first on the left and then on the right. The lung was retracted away from the field and the vessels (aorta and vena cava) were dissected off the pleura and T9 and T10 vertebral bodies in a circumferential fashion. Both T9 and T10 segmental vessels were ligated bilaterally. Rods were then attached to the screw heads from T7 through T12. Using Tomita saws, the midvertebral body of T9 was transected, as was the T10-T11 disc space. This completely mobilized the specimen. The specimen was then removed posterolaterally in en bloc fashion (Figure 46-11). A distractible cage was placed from T9 to T11. Bone grafting was done with allograft. Neurological monitoring remained stable throughout the case.

Postoperative Course

The patient was taken to the intensive care unit with preserved lower extremity neurological function. He remained intubated until postoperative day 1 when he was successfully extubated. Postoperative imaging disclosed good position of his cage and posterior screws (Figure 46-12). His postoperative course was complicated by new-onset atrial fibrillation. His chest tubes were discontinued on postoperative days 5 and 6 respectively. He was discharged on postoperative day 8. At 3 months after surgery, he was off narcotics and returned to work. Proton beam irradiation was scheduled.

References

1. Witham T.F., et al. Surgery insight: current management of epidural spinal cord compression from metastatic spine disease. Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol.. 2006;2(2):87-94.

2. Bilsky M. Metastatic tumors of the spine and spinal cord. In: Dickman C.A., Fehlings M.G., Gokaslan Z.L., editors. Spinal Cord and Spinal Column Tumors. New York: Thieme, 2005.

3. Patchell R.A., et al. Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9486):643-648.

4. McCormick P.C. BB: Spinal tumors. In: L.C., Grossman R.G. Principles of neurosurgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1999.

5. Hentschel S.J., M.I. Intradural extramedullary spinal tumors. In: Fehlings M.G., Dickman C.A., Gokaslan Z.L., editors. Spinal cord and spinal column tumors. New York: Thieme, 2005.

6. Cooper P.R., H.K. Intramedullary spinal cord tumors. In: Fehlings M.G., Dickman C.A., Gokaslan Z.L., editors. Spinal cord and spinal column tumors. New York: Thieme, 2005.

7. Jacobs W.B., F.M. Primary vertebral column tumors. In: Fehlings M.G., Dickman C.A., Gokaslan Z.L., editors. Spinal cord and spinal column tumors. New York: Thieme, 2005.

8. Chi J.H., et al. Epidemiology and demographics for primary vertebral tumors. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am.. 2008;19(1):1-4.

9. Mantha A., et al. A novel rat model for the study of intraosseous metastatic spine cancer. J Neurosurg. Spine. 2005;2(3):303-307.

10. Bagley C.A., et al. Fractionated, single-port radiotherapy delays paresis in a metastatic spinal tumor model in rats. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 2007;7(3):323-327.

11. Bagley C.A., et al. Local delivery of oncogel delays paresis in rat metastatic spinal tumor model. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 2007;7(2):194-198.

12. Gok B., et al. Surgical resection plus adjuvant radiotherapy is superior to surgery or radiotherapy alone in the prevention of neurological decline in a rat metastatic spinal tumor model. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(2):346-351.

13. Pennant W.A., et al. Microsurgical removal of intramedullary spinal cord gliomas in a rat spinal cord decreases onset to paresis, an animal model for intramedullary tumor treatment. Childs Nerv. Syst.. 2008;24(8):901-907.

14. Schuster J., Zhang J., Longo M. A novel human osteoblast-derived severe combined immunodeficiency mouse model of bone metastasis. J Neurosurg. Spine. 2006;4(5):388-391.

15. Fourney D.R., Gokaslan Z.L. Use of “MAPs” for determining the optimal surgical approach to metastatic disease of the thoracolumbar spine: anterior, posterior, or combined: invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 2005;2(1):40-49.