Treatment of Meniscus Tears with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Published on 11/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Orthopaedics

Last modified 11/04/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2338 times

Chapter 62 Treatment of Meniscus Tears with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Introduction

The treatment of meniscus tears in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction requires a thorough understanding of the different types of meniscus tears and their capacity for healing. The factors to consider are whether the tear is medial or lateral, degenerative or nondegenerative, or stable or unstable, as well as the vascular zone of the meniscus. The treatment choices are to remove, repair, or leave the tear in situ.

Meniscus tears with ACL injuries are different than meniscus tears in ACL intact knees. For a meniscus to tear, either (1) the knee is unstable, causing excessive movement, which in turn causes the meniscus to become caught between the femur and the tibia or (2) the knee is stable, and the meniscus has a degenerative component to it. In general, meniscus tears in ACL intact knees have extensive degeneration. Meniscus tears with an acute ACL injury are traumatic and occur mostly in the posterior and peripheral part of the meniscus. Meniscus tears in chronic ACL deficient knees can be degenerative or nondegenerative, depending on the number and severity of instability episodes.

The incidence of lateral meniscus tears has been reported to be higher than the incidence of medial meniscus tears with acute ACL injuries.1 Shelbourne and Gray2 found that of 448 patients with acute ACL injuries, 62% had lateral meniscus tears and 42% had medial meniscus tears, whereas in 609 patients with chronic ACL deficiency, 49% had lateral meniscus tears and 60% had medial meniscus tears. Cipolla et al3 found that of 218 acute injuries, 59% had lateral meniscus tears and 28.5% had medial meniscus tears, whereas in 552 chronic ACL injuries, 41.6% had lateral meniscus tears and 74% had medial meniscus tears. The lateral meniscus is mobile and translates 9 to 11 mm in the anteroposterior plane, whereas the medial meniscus translates only 2 to 5 mm.4 The lateral meniscus is more frequently injured acutely because of its extreme mobility, and the peripheral and posterior portions of the meniscus are prone to getting caught in the joint during an ACL instability episode, which may explain the high incidence of posterior horn avulsion tears with acute ACL injuries. The less mobile medial meniscus is less injured with acute ACL injuries, and it may take consecutive giving-way episodes for the peripheral posterior third of the meniscus to become caught in the joint. When patients do have a medial meniscus tear with an acute ACL injury, it is typically a peripheral vertical tear in the posterior third of the meniscus. This tear can extend anteriorly with additional giving-way episodes and eventually become a bucket-handle tear.

The fact that more lateral meniscus tears are seen with acute ACL injuries than with chronic ACL deficiency can be explained by the fact that most lateral meniscus tears with acute ACL injuries can heal without treatment. In fact, many medial meniscus tears seen at the time of acute ACL reconstruction can heal without repair. With the advent of knee arthroscopy, surgeons have felt compelled to treat many meniscus tears seen at the time of ACL reconstruction that would have been unobserved and left alone before knee arthroscopy was invented. The high meniscus repair success rate with ACL reconstruction can partially be explained by the fact that many menisci are being repaired that probably do not need any treatment at all.

This chapter will discuss the types of meniscus tears seen with ACL reconstruction, which meniscal tears can be left in situ, which tears to repair and the repair success rates, and finally the timing of meniscus repair with ACL reconstruction surgery.

Meniscus Tears to Leave in Situ

With acute ACL injuries, most meniscus tears are not symptomatic for the patient. The patient’s inability to fully extend the knee is usually due to the ACL stump being lodged in the intercondylar notch. Shelbourne et al5 found that joint line tenderness observed at the time of acute ACL injury does not correlate to the presence or absence of meniscus tears at the time of surgery. Over a 2-year period, 173 patients were seen for acute injury and were evaluated for joint line tenderness, and then the type of meniscus tear was recorded at the time of surgery. The investigators found that medial joint line tenderness was 45% sensitive and 34% specific for a medial meniscus tear. Lateral joint line tenderness was 58% sensitive and 49% specific for a lateral meniscus tear.5 We now delay ACL surgery until the patient’s knee has full range of motion and no swelling and the patient has good leg control. On the day of surgery, very few patients have joint line tenderness but about 50% have a meniscus tear.6 It appears that meniscus injuries in conjunction with acute ACL injuries are difficult to determine preoperatively based on joint line tenderness exam.

The meniscus has a blood supply provided by the perimeniscal capillary plexus, and these capillaries extend into 20% to 30% of the body of the medial meniscus and 10% to 25% of the lateral meniscus.7,8 Tears in the peripheral vascular zone of the meniscus are thought to be ideal for meniscus repair, but many can heal without specific repair treatment. The acuteness or chronicity of the ACL injury is not the deciding factor for determining the treatment of the meniscus. Rather, it is the location of the tear and the degenerative nature of the tear that help determine treatment.

Lateral Meniscus Tears

Complete removal of a torn lateral meniscus has a poor prognosis.9 In the early 1980s, the senior author observed the almost 100% success with repair of lateral meniscus tears and came to the conclusion that many of the lateral meniscus tears being repaired probably did not need repair. Therefore the senior author began to change his treatment of lateral meniscus tears from repairing 80% of the tears in 1984 to repairing 15% in 1992. During that same time, he changed his treatment from leaving lateral meniscus tears in situ in 4% of tears in 1984 to 70% in 1992. The types of lateral meniscus tears left alone included posterior horn avulsions (52 tears; Fig. 62-1), stable vertical tears that were posterior to the popliteus tendon (99 tears; Fig. 62-2), and nondisplaced vertical tears that extended anterior to the popliteus tendon (27 tears).10 With a follow-up at a mean of 2.6 years (range 1–9 years), Fitzgibbons and Shelbourne10 found that no patients returned to the clinic reporting symptoms of a lateral meniscus tear. One patient twisted his knee playing basketball at 114 days after ACL reconstruction and had a displaced bucket-handle medial meniscus tear. At the time of follow-up arthroscopy, the original vertical lateral meniscus tear had progressed to a complex T-type tear, but the tear did not extend anterior to the popliteus.

Shelbourne and Heinrich11 performed another long-term follow-up of 332 patients who had lateral meniscus tears left in situ or treated with abrasion and trephination without suture repair. The patients also had no medial meniscus tears or chondromalacia greater than grade II to isolate the factor of lateral meniscus tears in the long-term follow-up analysis. At a mean of 5.1 years after surgery, 162 patients (95%) had normal radiographs, six patients had nearly normal radiographs, and two patients had abnormal radiographs for lateral joint space narrowing using IKDC criteria. Of 70 patients with posterior horn avulsion tears left in situ, two (2.9%) underwent a subsequent procedure to remove the tear. Of 50 patients with radial flap tears, three patients (6%) needed a subsequent surgery for the tear. Of 169 patients with peripheral or posterior tears left in situ, three patients (1.8%) required subsequent surgery for the tear. None of the 43 patients who had peripheral or posterior tears treated with abrasion and trephination required further surgery.11